Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Lowering injuries and fatalities remains a crucial goal for our cities. A total of 95,615 traffic
accidents in National Capital Region (NCR) were recorded 2015, which caused 519 fatalities, the
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) reported on Thursday.
Additionally, 17,103 were injured and there were 77,993 records of "damage to property."
Based on data released by the Metro Manila Accident Recording and Analysis System
(MMRAS), last year's figures are higher compared to the 90,258 vehicle accidents for the year
2014, which killed 418 persons, injured 16,665 others and chalked up 73,175 reports of damage
to property.
To counteract these gruesome and unnecessary injuries and fatalities, cities should utilize speed
control mechanisms that influence behavior, lower speeds, and in turn, reduce injuries and
fatalities. Embracing a proactive design approach on new and existing streets with the goal of
reducing speeds may be the single most consequential intervention in reducing pedestrian injury
and fatality.
Speed plays a critical role in the cause and severity of crashes. There is a direct correlation
between higher speeds, crash risk, and the severity of injuries.
On city streets, designers should select a design speed to use in geometric decisions based on
safe operating speeds in a complex environment.
Higher design speeds often mandate larger curb radii, wider travel lane widths, on-street parking
restrictions, guardrails, and clear zones. Lower design speeds reduce observed speeding
behavior, providing a safer place for people to walk, park, and drive.
Mass differential between street users results in more severe injuries to the lighter of the two
colliding bodies.
CRITICAL
Design streets using target speed, the speed you intend for drivers to go, rather than
operating speed. The 85th percentile of observed target speeds should fall between 1030 mph
on most urban streets.
The maximum target speed for urban arterial streets is 35 mph. Some urban arterials may
fall outside of built-up areas where people are likely or permitted to walk or bicycle. In these
highway-like conditions, a higher target speed may be appropriate.
The maximum target speed for urban collector or local streets is 30 mph.
RECOMMENDED
Use short cycle lengths and/or slow signal progressions in downtown areas and networks
with closely spaced signals.
In neighborhoods, designers should consider 20 mph zones to reduce speeds to those safe for
interaction with children at play and other unpredictable behavior.
On local roads or in areas with above average pedestrian volumes, designers may choose
to select a design speed below the posted speed limit. Certain states disallow posted speeds of
less than 25 mph, but do not restrict operating speeds 10 mph below the speed limit.
OPTIONAL
Shared streets and alleys may be assigned target speeds as low as 510 mph.
Speed enforcement cameras have proven highly effective at reducing speeds and
increasing compliance of the speed limit.
Fill - sections manifest as elevated sections of a roadway or track bed. Environmental effects of
fill sections are typically favorable with respect to air pollution dispersal, but in the matter of
sound propagation, exposure of nearby residents is generally increased, since sound walls and
other forms of sound path blockage are less effective in this geometry.
There are a variety of reasons for creating fills, among them reduction of grade along a
route or elevation of the route above water, swampy ground, or areas where snow drifts
frequently collect. Fills can also be used to cover tree stumps, rocks, or unstable soil, in which
case material with a higher bearing capacity is placed on top of the obstacle in order to carry the
weight of the roadway or railway and reduce differential settlement.
THE CROSS SLOPE
The cross slope is provided in all tangent sections of the roadways. Slope usually fall in
both directions from the center line of the two lane highway except where super elevation of
curves directs all water towards the inside.
For a high type pavement, the crown or slope is often 1% to 2%. However, steeper slopes
are strongly recommended because rainwater flow away more rapidly and thereby reducing the
water thickness on the road pavement. A cross slope in one direction of a multi-lane highways
makes driving comfortable, but with heavy rainfall, the water depth increases on the roadway.
The paved shoulder cross slope ranges from 3% to 6% although 4% is the most common.
For a gravel shoulder, 4% to 6% slope is satisfactory and 8% slope is effective drainage for turf
(grass) surfaces.
This type of cross section allow the inner lane accommodate high speed traffic because it
is flatter than the outer lanes. On the very wide street, the parabolic crown surface makes the
center lanes almost flat unless gutters are sufficiently deep enough to convey water. A
combination of uniform slope with parabolic cure is used instead of parabolic sections.
NUMBER OF LANES
The number of lanes in a segment of a highway is determined from the estimated traffic
volume for the design year (AADT) and of highway lane capacity at expected level of service.
The AASHTO policy accept a dually divided 16 lane roadway with four lanes in each direction
for an inner freeway and four more lanes in each direction on the outside. There are instances
where a reversible lane is located at the center of freeways with unbalanced heavy traffic flow.
HIGHWAY MEDIAN
The median strip or central reservation is the reserved area that separates
opposing lanes of traffic on divided roadways, such as divided highways,dual
carriageways, freeways, and motorways. The term also applies to divided roadways other than
highways, such as some major streets in urban or suburban areas. The reserved area may simply
be paved, but commonly it is adapted to other functions; for example, it may accommodate
decorative landscaping, trees, a median barrier or railway, light rail or streetcar lines.
For narrow medians, there are four means of reducing cross median accident.
1. Deterring devices two sets of double strip painted on the existing pavement, raised diagonal
bars, low curbing and shallow ditches.
2. Non Traversable energy absorbing devices line chain link fence 1 meter high supported by
steel post augmented cables at the bottom and midpoint.
3. Non traversable rigid barriers are metal guard rail.
4. G.M. Barriers a high non-mountain sloped face concrete barriers called New Jersey. It is cast
or extruded in place or precast in section and set in position with crane.
Deterring devices
Non-Traversable Rigid Barriers
G.M. Barriers
In laying the grade line, the designer has to consider the following:
1. Where earthwork is minimal and consistently meeting sight distances in relation in grade line,
economy is one main consideration.
2. In mountainous areas, the grade line must be considered to have a balanced excavation against
embankments to get the minimum overall cost.
3. In a flat area, the grade line is set almost parallel to the ground surface but sufficiently above
the ground as allowance for drainage.
4. Undesirable native soil should be provided with sufficient cover.
5. Along river or streams, grade line elevation may be governed by the expected level of flood
water.
.
Interchange
A road junction that typically uses grade separation, and one or more ramps, to permit
traffic on at least one highway to pass through the junction without directly crossing any
other traffic stream. It differs from a standard intersection, at which roads cross at grade.
Function of freeway interchanges.
To provide separation between two or more traffic arteries.
To facilitate easy transfer of vehicles from one entry to the other or between local
roadways and the freeway.
Use of overpass or underpass?
UNDERPASS
Depends on topography, economy and any other minor factors
Underpass better for deceleration/acceleration, cost and advance warning
OVERPASS
Overpass better aesthetics
Types of interchange.
Four way interchanges:
1. Cloverleaf interchange
Typically a two-level, four-way interchange where all left turns are handled by
loop ramps (right turns if traveling on the left).
Advantage of cloverleaf:
they require only one bridge, which makes such junctions inexpensive as long as land is
plentiful
A major shortcoming of cloverleafs, however, is weaving and the consequent low
capacity of this design.
Objections to the cloverleaf interchange design:
It requires large area of land
At higher design speed, more time is consumed just to transverse the longer loops
Vehicles making left turn execute 270 right turn and travel greater distance becoming
very unpleasant and hazardous due to sharp curves and steep grades.
Vehicles leaving the curve loop in one quadrant weave those entering the adjacent loop
from the through road way.
2. Stack interchange
Whereby left turns are handled by semi-directional flyover/under ramps.
Disadvantages:
Expensive
creates an eyesore among local residents, leading to considerable (Not In My Back Yard)
opposition
3. Cloverstack interchange
Its ramps are longer to allow for higher ramp speeds, and loop ramp radii are
made larger as well. The large loop ramps eliminate the need for a fourth, and
sometimes a third level in a typical stack interchange, as only two directions of
travel use flyover/under ramps.
Advantages:
cheaper to build than stack interchanges
less of an eyesore for local residents
weaving is also eliminated
Disadvantages:
require a lot of land to construct
the loop ramps are not as efficient as flyover/under ramps in terms of traffic flow
5. Roundabout interchange
The ramps of the interchanging highways meet at a roundabout or rotary on a
separated level above, below, or in the middle of the two highways.
Other/hybrid interchanges
1. windmill interchange
is similar to a turbine interchange, but it has much sharper turns, reducing its size
and capacity
2. diverging windmill
Increases capacity by altering the direction of traffic flow of the interchanging
highways, making the connecting ramps much more direct.
3. Divided volleyball
Create a wide median between the carriageways of the two interchanging
highways, using this space for connecting ramps.
4. Full diamond
Large, multi-level interchanges that use flyover/under ramps to handle both right
and left ramps.
Three way interchanges
Trumpet interchange
Have been used where one highway terminates at another highway. These involve
at least one loop ramp connecting traffic either entering or leaving the terminating
expressway with the far lanes of the continuous highway.
Directional T interchange
Uses flyover/under ramps in all directions at a three-way interchange. A semi-
directional T does the same, but some of the splits and merges are switched to
avoid ramps to and from the passing lane.
Full Y interchange
Typically used when a three-way interchange is required for two or three
highways interchanging in semi-parallel/perpendicular directions, but it can also
be used in right-angle case as well. Their connecting ramps can spur from either
the right or left side of the highway, depending on the direction of travel and the
angle.
Two way interchanges
Diamond interchange
Interchange involving four ramps where they enter and leave the freeway at a
small angle and meet the non-freeway at almost right angles.
DESIGNING HIGHWAYS
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
is an engineering discipline branching from civil engineering that involves the planning,
design, construction, operation, and maintenance of roads, bridges, and tunnels to ensure
safe and effective transportation of people and goods. Highway engineering became
prominent towards the latter half of the 20th Century after World War 2. Standards of
highway engineering are continuously being improved. Highway engineers must take
into account future traffic flows, design of highway intersections/interchanges, geometric
alignment and design, highway pavement materials and design, structural design of
pavement thickness, and pavement maintenance.
HIGHWAY INTERSECTION
In the field of road transport, an interchange is a road junction that typically uses grade
separation, and one or more ramps, to permit traffic on at least one highway to pass
through the junction without directly crossing any other traffic stream. It differs from a
standard intersection, at which roads cross at grade. Interchanges are almost always used
when at least one of the roads is a controlled-access highway (freeway or motorway) or a
limited-access divided highway (expressway), though they may occasionally be used at
junctions between two surface streets.
General Principles and Considerations
Intersections are required to meet a variety of user expectations, particularly for users of
motor vehicles. Drivers expect to safely pass through intersections with minimal delay
and few conflicts. Drivers of large vehicles expect to be able to negotiate turns easily. In
urban areas, however, expectations based on rural and suburban experiences are
unreasonable. Intersection users in urban areas will experience delays and conflicts
between vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists. Driver expectations need to shift toward
taking turns with other modes and a sense of uncertainty, which creates a slower, vigilant
and safer environment.
Successful multimodal intersection design is based on several fundamental
geometric design and operational principles. These principles include:
Minimize conflicts between modes (such as signal phasing that separates vehicle
movements and pedestrian crossings, bicycle lanes extended to the crosswalk, pedestrian
refuge islands, low-speed channelized right turns and so forth.) Provide crosswalks on all
approaches.
Accommodate all modes with the appropriate levels of service for pedestrians, bicyclists,
transit and motorists given the recommended speed, volume and expected mix of traffic.
Intersections must be accessible to pedestrians with disabilities. This curb extension is equipped
with curb ramps and high-contrast detectable warnings.
Avoid elimination of any travel modes due to intersection design. Intersection widening
for additional turn lanes to relieve traffic congestion should be balanced against impacts
to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit.
Provide good driver and nondriver visibility through proper sight distance triangles and
geometric features that increase visibility, such as curb extensions.
Minimize pedestrian exposure to moving traffic. Keep crossing distances as short as
practical and use operational techniques (protected left-turn signal phasing and prohibited
right turn on red) to separate pedestrians and traffic as much as possible.
Design for slow speeds at critical pedestrian-vehicle conflict points, such as corners, by
using smaller curb return radii or low-speed channelized right-turn lanes.
Avoid extreme intersection angles and break up complex intersections with pedestrian
refuge islands. Keep intersections easily and fully comprehensible for all users. Strive for
simplicity in intersection designavoid designing intersections with more than four
approaches (or consider a modern roundabout) and keep cross streets as perpendicular as
possible.
Ensure intersections are fully accessible to the disabled and hearing and sight impaired.
Provide flush access to crossings, visual and audio information about WALK/DON'T
WALK phases and detectable warnings underfoot to distinguish pedestrian from
vehicular areas.
Alternative intersection configurations can manage turning traffic to increase safety and
intersection throughput. These include the Michigan left, "superstreet" and continuous flow
intersection.