Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
By C H A R L E S P. T A V T
M en in uniform and civilians have fam ilies. U nless th eir fam ilies
are decently cared for, die best arm y and the best civilian s w ill
soften u p . T h a t happened in G erm an y in 1918, and in France in
1940. Services to fam ilies are essential.
If m orale, and recreation , and in te llige n t education al processes,
and personal guidan ce and service are necessary fo r m en in uniform
even at the fron t, they are equ ally necessary for civilians. M en in
uniform and civilian s a lik e are peop le, and it is o f the essence o f
o ur w ar effort that w e b elieve in people and their im portance. T h e y
are m ore im p ortan t than the m achines they ru n. Y o u cann ot do
w ith ou t the m achines, it is true, b u t the m achines are worthless
w ith ou t men and w om en behind them.
W e have solved the p ro b lem o f how to deal w ith machines. W e
may n ot have all th e answers, b u t w e know how to get diem . D eal
in g w ith people is different. W e cannot afford to let barriers grow
betw een any groups o f o u r peop le. Soldiers at the fron t com plain
about soldiers at hom e. S'oldiers at hom e com plain abou t men on
the farms. M en on the farm s com plain about m en in the factories.
Voters com plain ab ou t Congressm en. T h e y all com plain abou t draft
dodgers in G overn m en t jobs.
C ertain ly w e have a righ t to be p roud o f o u r heroes and o f their
citations and th eir sufferings. C e rta in ly there are draft dodgers and
arm chair soldiers, ju st as there are occasional cowards at the front.
B ut they are m igh ty scarce. T h e vast m ajority are d o in g obscure,
hard, unpleasant, day-to-day tasks, and d o in g them w ell. E veryone is
doin g a b etter jo b than he ever did before. Everyone m ust do a still
better one. W e cann ot have unnecessary turnover o r absenteeism .
It w ill take the last effective oun ce o f o ur energies to w in this w ar.
W h at are they like, these peop le in the necessary civ ilia n econom y,
and exactly w hat is h a p p en in g to them? In F ebruary there were
50,900,000 people w o rk in g and, say, 8,000,000 in the arm ed forces.
T h a t total o f 58,900,000 com pares w ith the total o f 45,000,000 em
ployed at the tim e o f the census in 1940. In o th er words, 14,000,000
people w ho were n ot regu lar w orkers three years ago are now e id ier
in the A rm y or in industry. F ive m illio n new w orkers w ill go in to
industry in 1943. N o w on der m any have n ot yet a cquired good w ork
habits.
T h e re is a m uch higher level o f education am on g w orkers today
than there was twenty-five years ago, and they need it in o rder to
28 ABSENTEEISM A N D T U R N O V E R
perform the various kinds o f necessary skilled and sem iskilled oper
ations. T h a t should mean a m ore efficient selection by em ploym ent
departm ents and a more detailed study o f the in dividual in order to
adapt him to the job. N ow that o u r production m ust increase, and
w e have less m anpower, that type o f jo b analysis and personnel
study becom es absolutely essential, b u t it is n ot always available.
W ith increased hours and w ith new em ployees w ho have not
acquired stability there is always an increase in absences. W h at are
the facts?
T h e only way to know the facts is to analyze the causes of all
absences. Some com panies keep careful records; m any keep none;
and few com panies operate according to any standard system. In
M arch the W ar M anpow er Com m ission set up a standard system of
questions w hich w ould, am ong other points, seek to know if the
absence was due to illness o f the w orker or his fam ily, to lack of care
for children, to transportation, to housin g o r the weather, to fatigue,
o r to personal business. Absence on authorized vacations should also
be included, for its effects are the same and its purpose is related
to the other causes or their prevention. T h e p oin t is that in dealing
w ith people w ho are away from w ork there is no virtue, and m uch
confusion, in describing the absence by the term absenteeism ,
when it is intended to convey opprobrium . W h a t we are concerned
w ith is a diflicult problem , as com plicated as hum an nature, and we
cannot approach it successfully w ith annoyance or anger, to say
n oth in g of prejudice.
F ortunately, the w ord absenteeism is losing its popularity.
Investigations reveal that in a surprising n um ber o f cases causes
beyond the control o f the w orker were responsible for absence from
the jo b . In seeking m ethods o f brin gin g abou t u tilization o f our full
resources o f hum an energy, we recognize that the responsibility is
shared by the w orker, by the em ployer, and by the entire com m u
nity. P lan t managements, on the w hole, are conscious o f the rate o f
absence in their organizations, and they are begin n in g to get the
facts and are takin g in telligen t steps to get at the root o f the p ro b
lem.
Illness has always been one o f the m ajor causes o f absenteeism.
Before the w ar probably 80 to 95 percent o f absenteeism was due to
this one cause. A t the C in cin n ati M illin g M achine Com pany, for
instance, one o f the largest in the w orld, the rate in 1939 was 2.6
A BSENTEEISM A N D T U R N O V E R 29
percent or 6.6 days per em ployee per year. Som ething like five or
more days o f that absence average was caused by sickness. O f the
sickness rates over the coun try about 15 percent w ere form erly due
to accidental in ju ry in the plant, or to occupational diseases o f vari
ous kinds. T h e balance was caused by illness o r accident o rigin atin g
outside the plant. A ccid en t rates have gone u p some, b u t generally
speaking, those figures are probably n ot far off today.
A re any o f those absences d u e to m alingering? P robably there were
always a few m alingerers, and no do u b t there are more today. B ut
the existence o f such a fact docs n ot mean that the rem edy may be
easily found.
Absence rates have gone up, b u t illness is probably the cause o f
not over h a lf the total rate today, on the average. A t the C in cin n ati
M illin g M achine Com pany, the absence rate w ent from 2.6 in 1939
to 3.8 in 1941, and to 5.4 in 1942. T h e 17 days per man in the 1942
figure in cluded only 5.5 days or about one-third for sickness.
Some w ider averages have been taken. A study o f shipyards from
A p ril, 1942, to January, 1943, showed an absence rate o f 7.5 percent,
alth ou gh variations w ere w ide. A study of copper m ines in M ontana
showed a rate o f 8.5 percent; air fram e and propeller plants showed
an average o f 6.4 percent. V arious m an u facturin g plants, mostly in
the East, showed rates o f from 4 to 6 percent, w hich perhaps may be
taken as the average, alth ou gh it is abou t double the prew ar rates
in the same plants.
A n um ber o f elem ents are apparent on m ore detailed analysis.
W om en are o u t for longer periods o f time than m en. Still, a curious
fact developed at one plant: in general, w h ile the afternoon and
n ight shifts showed a higher rate o f absence than the m orn in g shift,
wom en on the aftern oon shift w ere off less than men on the same
shift, and less than w om en on the m orn in g shift. W om en are absent
for m ore extended illnesses (over eight days) than men; the rates in
1940 were 153 per thousand com pared w ith 96 per thousand for
men.
Rates vary am ong departm ents w ith in the sam e plant. Rates vary
by days o f the w eek in relation to pay day. In C levelan d 151 plants
showed an absentee rate o f 6.6 percent on M onday m orning. Pay
day on Friday always brin gs the lowest rate, b u t in a plan t w ith an
average o f 3.5 percent absent, the rate fo r pay day n ever got below
2.5 percent.
30 ABSENTEEISM A N D T U R N O V E R