Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Ashley Wondergem
Dr. Monika Ivantysynova
Purdue University
Introduction
Axial Piston Machines
Theory
Previous Research
Method
Fluid Structure Interaction Model
Simulation Study First Phase
Simulation Study Second Phase
Conclusion
Next Steps
Ivantysynova (1983)
ProposedLoss reductions
a barrel strongly dependent on
like piston
operating condition
Kleist (1997)
Surface shaping reduces friction forces
Study made with incomplete models
Lasaar (2003)
Barrel piston (analytical and experimental)
Volumetric losses reduced
Friction forces reduced
Pressure Deformations
Thermal Deformations Surface Profile
First phase:
4 different designs compared to baseline for moderate
operating conditions in pumping mode only
Second phase:
5 different designs compared to baseline for extreme operating
conditions in pumping and motoring mode
Pressure
(bar)
2000
1500
Lf Lf
1000 Lf
360 360
360
500 0
0 0
3
1
0 Case
Pressure
(bar)
2000
1500
1000 Lf
Lf Lf DC
360 360
360
500 0
0 0
Around
Up to 60%
70% reduction
reductionBUT fails at some
(barrel)
(flat); Based on 40%
operating conditions
Around 40% in
reduction clearance
reduction at
higher speed/pressures
Pressure
(bar)
2000
1500
1000 Lf
Lf Lf DC
360 360
360
500 0
0 0
Manufacture prototype
Contact Information
Monika Ivantysynova - mivantys@purdue.edu
Ashley Wondergem awonderg@purdue.edu