Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae

Mathematics, Issue 8, 2008

THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL

GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE OF UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS MAJORED IN MATHEMATICS

GNES BOSNYK, RITA NAGY-KONDOR

Abstract. This article deals with geometrical knowledge. The aim of our work was to des-
cribe situation in teaching of geometry at secondary schools in the Slovakia and Hungary. We
asked 94 students to solve 7 geometrical problems and analysed their solutions.

Rsum. Cet article dcrit gomtrie connaissances. Le but de notre travail tait dcrire la
situation de lenseignement de la gomtrie aux coles secondaires en Slovaquie et Hongrie.
On a donn 7 problmes aux 94 leves dun lyce et dans la suite on a compar des solu-
tions.

Zusammenfassung. In unserem Artikel handelt es sich um geometrische Kenntnisse. Das

Ziel unserer Arbeit war den Zustand des Unterrichts der Geometrie in den Mittelschulen in
der Slowakei und in Ungarn zu beschreiben. Wir haben 94 Studenten gebeten, 7 geometri-
sche Probleme zu lsen und die Lsungen haben wir dann analysiert.

Riassunto. Questo articolo affronta la tematica delle conoscenze geometriche. Lo scopo del
nostro lavoro stato quello di descrivere l'insegnamento della geometria nelle secondary
school in Slovacchia e Ungheria. Abbiamo chiesto a 94 studenti di risolvere 7 problemi di
geometria e in seguito abbiamo analizzato le loro soluzioni.

Abstrakt. V lnku sme sa zaoberali geometrickmi poznatkami. Naim cieom bolo op-
sa sasn stav vyuovania geometrie na strednch kolch na Slovensku a v Maarsku.
Poprosili sme 94 tudentov o rieenie geometrickch problmovch loh a analyzovali sme
ich rieenia.

Key words: spatial ability, spatial geometrical knowledge, imaginary manipulation, reconstruction,
teaching and learning spatial geometry, comparative survey
2 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

1 INTRODUCTION

We get most of our knowledge in a visual way so it is very important for us

how much we are aware of the language of vision. The definition of spatial abi-
lity according to Sra and his colleagues (Sra-Krpti-Gulys, 2002, p. 19)
the ability of solving spatial problems by using the perception of two and three
dimensional shapes and the understanding of the perceived information and
relations relying on the ideas of Haanstra (Haanstra, 1994, p. 88) and others.
In Gardner's (Gardner, 1983) opinion there is no uniform intelligence,
everybody has different kinds of insular intelligence. He distinguishes between
seven different types of intelligence: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial,
musical, physical-kinaesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal. According to
Gardner (Gardner, 1983, p. 9) the spatial intelligence is the ability of forming
a mental model of the spatial world and manoeuvring and working with this
model.
Gardner's (Gardner, 1983) multiple intelligence theory was improved by
Maier (Maier, 1998), distinguishing between five branches of spatial intelligence:
spatial perception: the vertical and horizontal fixation of direction regardless
of troublesome information;
visualisation: it is the ability of depicting of situations when the components
are moving compared to each other;
mental rotation: rotation of three dimensional solids mentally;
spatial relations: the ability of recognizing the relations between the parts
of a solid;
spatial orientation: the ability of entering into a given spatial situation.
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 3

The typical exercises for each types of intelligence are presented below
(Figure 1):

Figure 1. The typical exercises (Maier, 1998)

Vsrhelyi's (Vsrhelyi) definition of geometrical spatial ability: the mathe-

matically controlled complex unity of abilities and skills that allows:
the exact conception of the shape, the size and the position of the spatial
configurations;
the unequivocal illustration of seen or imaginary configurations based on
the rules of geometry;
the appropriate reconstruction of unequivocally illustrated configurations;
the constructive solution of different spatial (mathematical, technological...etc.)
problems, and the imagery and linguistic composition of this solution.
In the classification of the exercises we followed the recommendation of
Sra and his colleagues (Sra-Krpti-Gulys, 2002) who are approaching the
spatial problems from the side of the activity.
The types of exercises:
projection illustration and projection reading: establishing and drawing two
dimensional projection pictures of three dimensional configurations;
4 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

reconstruction: creating the axonometrical image of an object based on pro-

jection images;
the transparency of the structure: developing the inner expressive image
through visualizing relations and proportions;
two-dimensional visual spatial conception: the imaginary cutting up and
piecing together of two-dimensional figures;
the recognition and visualization of a spatial figure: the identification and
visualization of the object and its position based on incomplete visual infor-
mation;
recognition and combination of the cohesive parts of three-dimensional
figures: the recognition and combination of the cohesive parts of simple
spatial figures that were cut into two or more pieces with the help of their
axonometrical drawings;
imaginary rotation of a three-dimensional figure: the identification of the
figure with the help of its images depicted from two different viewpoints by
the manipulation of mental representations;
imaginary manipulation of an object: the imaginary following of the phases
of the objective activity;
spatial constructional ability: the interpretation of the position of three-
dimensional configurations correlated to each other based on the manipula-
tion of the spatial representations;
dynamic vision: the imaginary following of the motion of the sections of
spatial configuration.
The development of the spatial ability has to be started in the early ages of
childhood. The conventions of the spatial representation can be taught effectively
at the age of 912. The demand for the visualisation and drawn expression of the
three-dimensional space appears at the age of 1214. According to the experience
of art teachers, the space representation has to be taught for some children be-
cause they would never reach that level by themselves. Therefore our image and
definitions of space are not congenital; they are the result of a long developmental
and experimental learning process.
This article reports about a survey about the topic of spatial ability and
spatial geometry on a Slovakian and a Hungarian university. We surveyed the
knowledge of 94 first year mathematics majors at the Komensk University in
Bratislava and at the University of Debrecen. We examined the performance of
mathematics majors, since we can achieve improvement in the development of
spatial ability and the teaching of spatial geometry if the future teachers are
competent in this topic.
Shea and his colleagues (Shea-Lubinski-Benbow, 2001) state in their research
about the connection between mathematics and spatial ability that the intellectu-
ally talented adolescents who has better spatial than verbal abilities are more li-
kely to be found in the field of engineering, computer sciences and mathematics.
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 5

Although, Danihelov (Danihelov, 2000) and Tompa (Tompa, 2001) reports

about the poor spatial ability and spatial geometry of school leavers, we, accor-
ding to the researches of Shea and his colleagues (Shea-Lubinski-Benbow, 2001),
expect a good result from mathematics majors.
In the first chapter we present the literature about the difficulties of teaching
and learning of spatial geometry from both countries. The second chapter contains
the numbers and the contents of classes about spatial geometry suggested by the
curricula. In the third and fourth chapter we report about the circumstances and
the results of the survey then we examine the most frequent mistakes. The last
chapter is the summary of the article and our experiences.

2 THE DIFFICULTIES OF TEACHING AND LEARNING SPATIAL

GEOMETRY

Forty years ago teachers paid more attention to the teaching of spatial geo-
metry, especially to the descriptive geometry in Slovakian secondary schools.
Nowadays, these two topics are almost completely disappeared from the curri-
cula. We can find the descriptive geometry only among optional courses or some-
times not even there. As far as the material of the spatial geometry is concerned, it
is limited only to some classes. We often hear explanations for this like the lack
of time or teachers don't really like to start a hard topic like that. (Boek, 1990)
The spatial geometry is one of the most problematic parts of teaching mathe-
matics. One of the reasons for this is that there are complicated connections
among even the basic definitions. The task of the teacher is to motivate the pupils
to an adequate extent, to arouse the interest of the pupils in spatial geometry.
The teacher has to ponder the opportunities for exercises on classes and pay
attention to the former knowledge of the pupils. But the structure of the topic is
very important too. (Hejn et al., 1989)
In Hungary, Krteszi (Krteszi, 1972) already wrote about the difficulties
of teaching spatial geometry in 1972. The teaching of spatial geometry comes
only after the teaching of plane geometry. They deal with the plane geometry
first, as if the space around the plane figures did not exist. This is why difficul-
ties appear for not developing spatial ability in time. The teaching and learning
of this topic causes several different problems for the teachers and the pupils as
well. The spatial ability of the pupils because of the small number of classes
dealing with spatial geometry is poor. There are very few teachers who know
how to illustrate things quickly and properly on the board. The division of plane
and spatial geometry in time and topic in the curriculum, results in missing the
development of spatial ability in the optimal age. Although, the spatial ability
can be developed to a great extent. The school's job is to develop these abilities,
and the teacher's duty is to acquire the classical and modern methods that are
6 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

suitable for that. Because the undeveloped spatial ability cannot be replaced by
a high level of theoretical knowledge. Vsrhelyi (Vsrhelyi) writes that the
analysis and the generalisation are obstructed by mistakes that appear in the
pedagogical practise of demonstration:
the split of the observation and the abstract way of thinking;
the over crowdedness of the demonstrational material;
special situation...etc.
In Hungary the primary aim of teaching geometry in grammar schools is
the development of the geometrical approach, the imagery thinking and the abi-
lity of plane and spatial orientation. For the successful acquiring of geometrical
notions, constructs and transformations, it is essential to have a talent in drawing
according to the age. A survey made on primary school pupils (Frei, 2004)
shows that the geometrical knowledge of the pupils is continuously augmenting
and deepening in the higher classes. Although, the role of the spatial ability is
growing in higher classes, it does not reach the 40 percent of the expected deve-
lopmental level even in the 8th year classes, the 5th year pupils have reached
a very low level in the test of spatial ability. Therefore the development of the
spatial ability would deserve more attention in terms of teaching geometry.
Tompa (Tompa, 2001) reports about the results of school-leavers on the
mathematics school-leaving exam in 1995-98. The topics of the school-leaving
exams were chosen from the following ones:
percentage, first- and second-degree equations,
logarithmic, trigonometric equations, functions,
number theoretical problems,
plane geometry, co-ordinate geometry, geometrical calculations,
spatial geometry, location,
vectors, trigonometry,
titles to be proven.
According to the report, pupils performed so poorly that if they had to pre-
sent one certain competence from each and every topic to pass their exams many
of them would fail.
A similar survey was made in Slovakia. Danihelov (Danihelov, 2000) in
her collection volume reports among others about the results of the school-leaving
exam from mathematics in 320 Slovakian secondary schools in 19992000. The
topics of the school-leaving exam were chosen from eight categories in Slovakia:
set theory and logic,
number theory,
combinatorics and calculus of probability,
serials and functions,
equations, inequalities and equation systems,
analytical geometry,
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 7

plane geometry,
spatial geometry.
From the survey it has turned out that the level of knowledge of the pupils is
very low. The efficiency in each topic was between 38,56 % and 61,11 %. Most
of the deficiencies can be observed in the solving of spatial geometrical tasks.
It is worth to think about why is always the spatial geometry the hardest
task on all school-leaving exams?

3 THE TEACHING OF SPATIAL GEOMETRY IN SLOVAKIA

AND HUNGARY

Both in Hungary and Slovakia in lower classes of primary school, due to

the age of the pupils, there is a key role of experimental learning and manipula-
tion. In secondary schools the theoretical plane and the deductive character of the
object is coming more and more to the front. Of course the processing built on
experience and activity still cannot be neglected, especially in the case of pupils
who are learning mathematics quite slowly. The differences in the abstraction
level of pupils are huge, that is why it is important for the objective and imagery
visualizations to come on. The professional recommendation on the school ma-
terials in mathematics for the teaching of 9th12th year pupils orders minimal
demonstrational tools for the topic of geometry, like wall pictures, slides for the
over head projector, compasses, rulers and conic sections. As minimal mathemati-
cal instruments pupils are required to use compasses, rulers, plane- and spatial
geometrical models, and calculator; and they are advised to use computer pro-
grammes, the Internet and didactic CDs for there better understanding.
In the Slovakian secondary schools, both in the Slovakian-speaking ones
and in the Hungarian-speaking ones, generally the same course-books are used,
of course the ones that suit the schools' character the most. According to the
curriculum of mathematics the number of the compulsory mathematics classes
a week 4433. (Blint-Sdeck, 1999) (Gavora, 2001) (Hanula, 2001)
8 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

The number of classes that can be used for teaching certain topics in Slovakia
(Uebn osnovy gymnzia tvorron tdium, 1997, 1999) (Table 1):
Table 1. The number of classes that can be used for teaching certain topics in Slovakia

SECONDARY SCHOOL 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year

Introduction to mathematics 20 0 0 0
Number theory 14 0 0 0
Functions, equations, inequalities 40 54 0 46
Geometry 20 60 83 0
Combinatorics, calculus of probability and statistics 24 0 0 20
Complementary curriculum 6 10 8 16
Tests 8 8 8 8

The number of classes recommended for the teaching of spatial geometry

in Slovakian secondary schools is 45 classes. Out of this 20 classes are held in
the second year and the rest 25 is held in the first half of the third year.
The material suggested for the teaching of spatial geometry in Slovakia
(Table 2):
Table 2. The material suggested for the teaching of spatial geometry in Slovakia
st
1 year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year
The mutual The mutual position, distance, and angle
position of spatial of spatial elements with calculations
elements. and compiling.
The surface area and volume of the prism and
the roll; the Cavalieri-principle.
The surface area and volume of the pyramid,
the cone, the truncated pyramid and the
truncated cone.
The surface area and volume of the sphere;
regular solids; interlocked solids.

There are five series of course-books in Hungary for the 9th12th year classes.
When the course-books are being chosen the teacher or the school has to decide
what kind of methodology they wish to follow. They can choose books that are
more like activity books, or they can stay with classical course-books that contain
the necessary knowledge and ready-made exercises. They can even choose books
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 9

(Czegldy et al., 2005) that allow the preparation for both the basic and the advan-
ced level school-leaving exams.
In Hungary, according to the curriculum of the secondary schools the mini-
mum compulsory number of maths classes a week in the 9th12th year classes is
3334. In the curriculum they pay extra attention to emphasize the spiral
structure of the material. Besides they find the use of the inductive method very
important in making definitions. The teaching order of each topic is not determi-
ned by the curriculum, it is regulated in the syllabus based on one of the curri-
culum. The table below shows the number of classes that can be used for teaching
certain topics based on one of the curriculum (Kosztolnyi, 2000). During the
making of the syllabus these topics can be rearranged, where it is needed, with
the materials that belong to it.
The number of classes for each topic in Hungary (Table 3):
Table 3. The number of classes for each topic in Hungary
SECONDARY SCHOOL 9th year 10th year 11th year 12th year
Methods of thinking 6 6 10 15
Arithmetic, algebra 38 40 31 23
Functions, series 15 12 14 25
Geometry 39 39 40 45
Calculus of probability and statistics 5 8 10 10
Review at the end of the year 6 6 6 10
Altogether 111 111 111 128

In Hungary the recommended number of classes the teaching of geometry

(Czapry-Czapry, 2002), (Kosztolnyi, 2003), (Szmad-Bkssy, 2002),
(Urbn, 2004), (Vancs, 2005), (Vincze, 2001) (Table 4):
Table 4. In Hungary the recommended number of classes the teaching of geometry
9th year 10th year 11th year 12th year
Kosztolnyi 39 39 40 45
Czapry 21+3 31 40 43
Hajd 36 36 40 ?1
Hajnal 24 26<2 33<2 30<2
Vancs 29 33 35 ?1

1
These two course-books do not published handbook for teachers for the 12th year.
2
This syllabus determines only minimum number of mathematics classes.
10 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

Within this, the recommended topics and number of classes for teaching
spatial geometry (Table 5):
Table 5. The recommended topics and number of classes for teaching spatial geometry
9th year 10th year
Kosztolnyi 2 The mutual position 38 The relation of the surface area
Czapry 1 of spatial elements; 3 and volume of similar solids;
Hajd 1 Notable set of points 45 Spatial calculations with the
in the space. help of trigonometric functions;
Hajnal 1 45
The use of vectors in space.
Vancs 1 34

11th year 12th year

Kosztolnyi The mutual position, distance, and angle of spatial
0 21
elements;
Czapry 0 21 The surface area and volume of the prism
Hajd 1 ?3 and the roll; the Cavalieri-principle;
The surface area and volume of the pyramid,
Hajnal 0 16<4
the cone, the truncated pyramid and
the truncated cone;
Vancs 0 ?3 The surface area and volume of the sphere; regular
solids; interlocked solids.

In the comparison to make things a bit clearer we used 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th
year instead of 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th. The minimal compulsory number of maths
classes a week is more in the 1st and 2nd year and less in the 4th year in Slovakia
than it is in Hungary, but in the four years it is altogether 163. The following
diagrams show the rate of geometry and spatial geometry correlation to mathe-
matics and geometry. The percentage rates were calculated in every case accor-
ding to the curriculum. For the calculation of the rate of spatial geometry we
considered the number of classes in the Kosztolnyi curriculum.

3
These two course-books do not published handbook for teachers for the 12th year.
4
This syllabus determines only minimum number of mathematics classes.
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 11

The first diagram within the maths class shows the rate of geometry in both
countries (rate within mathematics) (Figure 2):

Geometry

100
83,84
Rate within maths (%)

80

60 Slovakia
45,45
35,14 35 36 35,16 Hungary
40
15,15
20
0
0

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year

Figure 2. Rate of geometry within the maths class5

The rate of geometry compared to the other maths topics in Hungary is

higher in the 1st and 4th year and lower in the 2nd and 3rd year than it is in Slovakia.
There is a big difference between the 3rd years (47,84 %), since pupils are taught
geometry during almost the whole year. In Hungary the numbers of geometry
classes are almost the same in all four years, while in Slovakia the numbers of
geometry classes are gradually growing from the first year to the third and then
they do not have any geometry classes in the fourth year.
The recommended number of classes for teaching spatial geometry in the
two countries (Table 6):
Table 6. The recommended number of classes for teaching spatial geometry5
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year Altogether
Slovakia 20 25 45

Hungary 12 38 1621 2131

5
In the 4th year the students review spatial geometrical knowledge at the end of the year in both
countries.
12 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

The next two diagrams show the rate of spatial geometry first in maths then
in geometry based on the curriculum in the two countries (Figure 3) (Figure 4):

Spatial geometry

100
Rate within maths (%)

80

60 Slovakia

40 Hungary
25,25
15,15 16,4
20
0 1,8 4,95 0 0
0

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year

Figure 3. Rate of spatial geometry within the mathematics (Kosztolnyi, 2000)67

Spatial geometry

100
Rate within geometry (%)

80

60 Slovakia
46,66
33,33 30,12 Hungary
40

20 14,1
0 5,13 0 0
0

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year

Figure 4. Rate of spatial geometry within the geometry (Kosztolnyi, 2000)6

6
In the 4th year the students review spatial geometrical knowledge at the end of the year in both
countries.
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 13

In Slovakia there are 14 more days devoted for teaching spatial geometry in
secondary schools even if we count the maximum number of classes recommen-
ded for this topic in Hungary. In case we count the minimum number of classes
devoted for spatial geometry in Hungary, then the difference between the two
countries will be 24! The suggested material for both countries is the same, the
difference is that in Slovakia it is taught in the 2nd and 3rd years and in Hungary it
is taught in the 1st, 2nd and 4th years.
All in all, we can admit that there is little time devoted for the teaching of
spatial geometry in both countries.

4 THE COMPARATIVE SURVEY

We made our comparative survey in September 2005 among mathematics

majors at the Komensk University and the University of Debrecen. We exami-
ned and compared the students' spatial ability and spatial geometrical knowled-
ge. At the university in Bratislava 43 students at the university in Debrecen 51
students took the test.
We prepared the test in a way that it contained the important components of
the spatial ability. With the last two tasks we also wanted to examine the stu-
dents' problem solving abilities. The first five tasks can be found in the book of
Sra-Krpti-Gulys: The spatial ability (Sra-Krpti-Gulys, 2002), we made
a slight change on the fifth task.

The survey:

1. We cut the solid on the task sheet with a plane. We marked the lines of
intersections with a thick continual line on the surface of the solid. Draw
the lines of intersections on the solid's laid out surface (web)! We draw one
point of the line of the intersection on the web of the solid.
14 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

2. There is an axonometric picture of a wire framework built inside of a cube.

The vertices of the figure are the same as the vertices of the cube or the
midpoints of the sides of the cube. How can this figure be shown from the
front, top and the right side?

3. On the figure we can see the projection of a solid truncated by planes.

Reconstruct the solid by drawing the visible picture of it! Draw only the
visible edges!

4. The edges of the solid seen on the task sheet are of the same length. A
ladybird wants to get from point A to point B on the shortest way it is
possible. Which one of the edges marked by x does it have to go through?
Explain your solution!
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 15

5. The points drawn in the cube are the vertices, midpoints of the edges or the
sides or the diagonal line. What kind of geometric figure will we get if we
connect the given points? Draw the geometric figures!
Sample task: SCD right-angled triangle

BAF
SEF
BSD
=?
FDC
EAC

6. There is a cube ABCDEFGH (length of the edge: a). Determine the distance
of point E from the plane BDG.

7. The measures of an ABCDEFV regular six-sided pyramid: AB = a = 4 cm ,

AV = b = 6 cm . Determine the mesure of the angle between the sides and
the base of the pyramid.
16 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

Following the theory of Sra and his colleagues (Sra-Krpti-Gulys, 2002)

we made the task sheet from the more important types of tasks. The first task
focuses on the imaginary manipulation of the solid. The task is to follow such
phases of the objective activity that consist of the complex spatial transformation
of the solid. The second task belongs to the types of tasks that deals with repre-
sentation and reading of the projection. By mobilizing the experience of the
motion, changing the inner viewpoint, imaginary rotation, manipulation of mental
representations, and the task is to produce and draw the two-dimensional projec-
tion picture of a three-dimensional solid. This type of task is characterized by ana-
lytical operations from concrete to abstract. The third task is a reconstructural
task. We have to create the axonometrical picture of the solid based on the
projection pictures. During the reconstruction the student synthesizes the visual
information by studying the projection pictures. The map will be constructed by
the series of changing the inner viewpoint by harmonizing three channels. The
fourth and fifth task focuses on the checking of the comprehension of the struc-
ture. It tests how the inner picture of view reflects the real spatial relations of the
solid. The level of the task refers to the punctuation of the correction of
distortion caused by the viewpoint and the illustration. The result of the fourth
task can point to the punctuation of the objective cognitive map, whereas the
result of the fifth task can point to the balance of cognition and understanding
and to the cooperation of cognition and definitional operations.
The sixth and seventh task shows the problem solving ability of the students
in the field of solving spatial geometrical tasks. Some preliminary knowledge of
spatial geometry is needed for solving these tasks. They have to be aware of the
definitions used in this topic and the characteristics of points, lines and planes.
They have to know the relations between them. These two tasks give an answer
to our question to what extent and how can the students comprehend the spatial
relation and how much they can imagine the inner side and the structure of the
cube and the regular six-sided pyramid.

5 RESULTS AND THE MOST COMMON MISTAKES

We gave one point to each task, but only in case of correct part tasks. We
did not deduct a point in case of slight inaccuracy and slightly incorrect rates. In
the fourth task there are two ways of solution in the case of the second cube, but
we did not give extra points for getting both solutions. In the last two tasks it is
the students' task to name the vertices of the solids by the given letters. In the
case of these two tasks we gave points only to the correct calculations deduced
logically. The next diagram shows the performance of the students on the test
(Figure 5):
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 17

Results

100
72,09
80
Performance (%)

60,78 Students of Komensk

58,82
60 University
51,16
44,18
32,55 Students of University
40
21,57 27,45 of Debrecen
21,17
15,69 18,6 18,6
20
4,65 5,88
0
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Tasks

Figure 5. Students performance

We are listing the typical mistakes in the following sections. We call a mis-
take typical if it was committed by at least the 10 % of the students.

1. The students of the Komensk University were 11,31 % better in the tasks
of manipulating the imaginary solid. Both groups managed to solve these
tasks the best of all.
The 27,91 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 39,22 %
of the students of the University of Debrecen draw the line of intersections
to a wrong place.

2. In the exercises of the representation of projections the students of the

University of Debrecen scored 14,64 % better than the other one.
The 34,88 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 21,57 % of the
students of the University of Debrecen could not imagine the perpendicular
projections of some parts of the wire framework figure.
The 20,93 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 19,61 % of
the students of the University of Debrecen did not draw all the views or they
left some parts of the figure out.
18 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

3. In the reconstructional exercise was the biggest difference between the two
groups. At the Komensk University there were 29,99 % more students
who knew the correct solution.
The 46,51 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 78,83 %
of the students of the University of Debrecen reconstructed the solid
incorrectly or incompletely based on its projection picture. The 45,1 % of the
students of the University of Debrecen gave the solution that can be seen on
the middle figure.

4. The students of the Komensk University scored their worst in the task
related to the punctuation of the objective cognitive map, they managed
to solve the task 11,04 % worse than the students of the University of
Debrecen. The students of the University of Debrecen also reached a low
level at the test of the comprehension of the structure. Therefore, it is true
for both of them that the inner view of the picture does not reflect the
object's real spatial relations punctually enough.
The 51,16 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 45,1 % of
the students of the University of Debrecen in the case of one or both cubes
chose that point, through which the way would be the quickest if it was
a plane figure.

The 11,63 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 13,73 %
of the students of the University of Debrecen gave only one solution in the
case of the second cube.
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 19

The 18,6 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 41,18 % of
the students of the University of Debrecen suspected that the shortest way
is not through point C, but they chose the nearest point to that as a solution
without explanation.

Some of the explanations:

a is shorter than b in the right-angled triangle the side

is shorter than the hypotenuse

Those distances that are the shortest in each square make

the shortest way to get from A to B
20 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

5. From the students of the Komensk University there were 10,98 % more
people who solved correctly the tasks on the balance of perception and
thinking.
The 27,91 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 19,61 %
of the students of the University of Debrecen without drawing anything
they named each of the plain figures incorrectly.
Those who tried to draw each of the plain figures gave a correct solution for
them in 1411 cases. The 13,95 % of the students of the Komensk University
and the 11,76 % of the students of the University of Debrecen tried to put all
the figures in a square or tried to connect each point in the cube as if all the
points in the cube were in the same plane- and they named the plane figures
they got.

The 20,93 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 37,25 %
of the students of the University of Debrecen wrote line as a solution for
the BSD instead of figure.

6. The students of the University of Debrecen scored their worst in this exer-
cise 12,72 % less than the students of Komensk University.
The 27,91 % of the students of the Komensk University and the 29,41 %
of the students of the University of Debrecen tried to solve the task by
drawing, but incorrectly, 13,95 % and 19,61 % could not even draw the
BDG plane properly or did not even start the task at all.

7. The smallest difference between the two groups was in the problem-solving
task: the students of the University of Debrecen solved the task 8,85 %
better than the other ones. The low rate of fulfilling the sixth and seventh
task shows that the problem solving ability of the students is poor in the
field of spatial geometry.
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 21

At the solving of the seventh task the

41,86 % of the students of the Ko-
mensk University and the 27,45 %
of the students of the University of
Debrecen committed the mistake of
not knowing exactly which angle's
mesure they have to calculate. 18,6 %
and 29,41 % found the right angle,
but could not calculate the mesure
of it.
Except for the third task the difference between the students of the two
universities did not go beyond 15 %. The students of both universities, except
for 22 tasks, scored below 50 % on the test.
The imaginary manipulation of the object, the description and reading of
projection, reconstruction went well although at the reconstructional task
the students of the University of Debrecen were much worse. The students
of the University of Debrecen were better at the description of projection,
but the students of the Komensk University were better at the reconstruc-
tional tasks. Based on the comparison of the curricula and the results of the
fourth and the last tasks we can conclude that the students of the University
of Debrecen remember better to definitions and titles, since they have learnt
them in the not too far past, they have learnt spatial geometry also in the 4th
year. In general, though, the students of the Komensk University scored
better, maybe because on the 3rd year they learnt only geometry and they
spent more time with spatial geometry so they can see the connections better
and the have more practice in task solving.
On the whole, the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh tasks were managed to be
solved very poorly, less than 35 %. On the basis of this we can conclude that
the comprehension of the structure is not perfect, the inner demonstrational
picture is inaccurate, it does not reflect the objects real spatial relations, the
correction of the distortions of depiction is not accurate enough. The poor
scores at the last two tasks show that the problem solving ability of most
students in spatial geometry tasks is quite poor. Some of the students are
even not aware of the idioms used in the topic of spatial geometry (e.g. the
angle between the lateral face and the base). Even though the plane and
spatial geometrical notions and titles are important for the spatial ability as
well as the development of analogical way of thinking. We can talk about
mathematical knowledge only in case of those students who can use the defi-
nitions and titles in practice as well. (Kosztolnyi, 2000)
22 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

6 SUMMARY

In contrast to Shea and his colleagues (Shea-Lubinski-Benbow, 2001) we

found that the students of our survey applied for maths courses for nothing after
graduating from the secondary school and they might want to find employment
in this field later, they still do not have really good spatial abilities, spatial
ability. Unfortunately, the results of Danihelov (Danihelov, 2000) and Tompa
(Tompa, 2001) were confirmed with the maths majors as well, because the re-
sults in most of the tasks in our survey were less than 50 %.
During the teaching of spatial geometry in Slovakia and Hungary we often
meet with the shortcomings of the students' spatial ability and spatial knowledge
even in case of those students who achieved good results in mathematics. This
generally results in the students loosing their sense of security, which makes
their antipathy towards this topic even worse. But what can be the solution?
How could we develop the spatial ability?
The research of Kirby and Boulter (Kirby-Boulter, 1997) presents a way of
teaching of geometry on projections, projections and rotations that made a po-
sitive effect on the visual abilities of 1314 year old Canadian children. Based on
the results, they concluded that those who had disadvantages according to the
tests of spatial ability, their abilities can be improved if the teaching of geo-
metry is deep enough.
The role of an exact logical-theoretical background of the stereometrical
theory: a long time teaching experience in the stereometry and descriptive geo-
metry shows that no adequate spatial ability can be reached without a complete
command of theoretical foundations of stereometry. It is very important a routi-
ne command of a geometrical mapping method of the space into a plane, for
example of the free parallel projection.
Lord applied a 30 minutes practise on a 14 weeks course with first/second
year students where they had tasks in which they had to cut three-dimensional
solids in their mind and then they had to draw the area of the two-dimensional
planes they got. (Lord, 1985) In the post-test the spatial awareness and efficien-
cy became better.
According to Horvth and his colleagues (Horvth-Kiss-Horvth, 1991) in
the teaching and learning of geometry the three-dimensional models can be a great
help. It is much easier to imagine and represent the different views of a solid
when we can see the formal characteristics. The proper use and frequent study
of spatial visual aids can result in such an inner spatial vision that makes the
individual imagination of the spatial relations possible. (Vsrhelyi)
The results of the survey prove that it causes a problem for many students
to imagine a spatial figure and this way it affects the solving of spatial geo-
metrical tasks as well. Therefore it would be very useful to start the teaching of
spatial geometry in secondary schools in both countries with spending more
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 23

time with the models of spatial solids and on the university courses some review-
systematisation classes or even a whole semester should be devoted for the summa-
ry of spatial ability, spatial geometry and solving spatial geometrical tasks. The
effectiveness of teaching spatial geometry can be influenced to a great extent by
using several different models, manipulation activities with spatial models,
especially dynamic, in the demonstration of relations between spatial models and
operations with them (even at the university level). When they had acquired the
basic characteristics and relations by the help of traditional models then they
could be introduced to the new definitions. Since there is a huge difference
between the students' level of abstraction, it is important that the objective visuali-
sation should be appear when it is needed. Vsrhelyi (Vsrhelyi) calls the
attention to the use of computers besides the traditional models, because they pro-
vide help for the motivation of the students. The interactive worksheets that can be
made by dynamic geometrical systems remind us to the concrete model and they
lead us to the iconic representation. After acquiring the direct experiences through
concrete objective manipulation, a properly prepared interactive worksheet can
help to separate the characteristics of the model from the general characteristics,
different objects can be created and be observed in varied size and position.
According to Vsrhelyi (Vsrhelyi) it is practical to make four periods in
the usage of models:
with models,
with models and their pictures (e.g. by computer animation),
with pictures and their prepared models or animated pictures,
problem solving only with the help of pictures.
Bak (Bak, 2006) was studying the conditions of the beneficial usage of
computer in the teaching of spatial geometry. On the grounds of her researches
she concluded that in acquiring the basic definitions of spatial geometry and the
cognition of solids, the usage of models are still needed. After the development of
basic abilities, the computer can get a role in developing the spatial intelligence
from the 7th year of the primary school. She found that the help of the computer
could develop all of the skills given by Maier (Maier, 1998). At the same time,
she experienced that we should not overdo the use of computers, because the
explanation of the teacher, the usage of models and individual work are needed
as well.
We want to call the attention to one of the computer programs for pupils
made at the University of Veszprm (Sk Lnyi-Lnyi-Tilinger, 2003) that helps
the development of spatial ability. It is very useful that the program is inter-
active so we can rotate the solids by the mouse or we can use animations. It
gives a hand in, among others, the comprehension of the structure, the imagina-
ry transformations of the solids, the recognition and representation of the spatial
figure and it the field of making projections.
24 . BOSNYK, R. NAGY-KONDOR

We all agree in that the development of the spatial ability is a very important
task because we have to understand and develop the geometry knowledge of the
students in the unity of the theoretical knowledge and the spatial abilities. Every
skill, like the spatial ability as well can be developed at the right age with the
suitable teaching strategy.
The results of the students in this survey were assessed on the basis of
written documents. In the future we plan to make task based student interviews
and further surveys by questionnaires to reveal the problems and their results.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to thank Professor Andrs Ambrus his valuable advice and help.

REFERENCES

Bak, M. (2006): Utilisation de lordinateur pour le dveloppement de la vision spatiale, Thse En

Co-Tutelle, Lcole doctorale CLESCO, Universit Paul Sabatier, Toulouse et de Lcole
doctorale de Mathmatiques et Informatiques, Universit de Debrecen
Blint, ., Sdeck, V. (1999): Vzdelvac tandard pre 2. stupe zkladnej koly, Ministerstvo
kolstva Slovenskej republiky, slo 546/994, Bratislava
Boek, M. (1990): Zklady geometrie v priestore, SPN, Bratislava
Czapry, E., Czapry, E. (2002): tmutat s tanmenetjavaslat, Nemzeti Tanknyvkiad, Budapest
Czegldy, I., Hajd, S., Hajd, S. Z., Kovcs, I., Rka, S. (2005): Tanmenet, Mszaki Knyvkiad,
Budapest
Danihelov, H. (2000): Maturita po novom - Zbornk z celoslovenskho seminra, Metodick
centrum mesta Bratislavy, Bratislava
Frei, L. (2004): Az ltalnos iskolai geometriatuds s a rajzkszsg fejldse, Iskolakultra, 2004/11
Gardner, H. (1983): Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences, Basic Books, New York
Gavora, P. (2001): vod do pedagogickho vskumu, UK, Bratislava
Haanstra, F. H. (1994): Effects of art education on visual-spatial and aesthetic perception: two meta-
analysis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen
Hanula, M. (2001): Vzdelvac tandard s exemplifikanmi lohami z matematiky pre gymnzium
tvorron tdium, P, Bratislava
Hejn, M. a kol. (1989): Teria vyuovania matematiky. Bratislava, SPN
Horvth, J., Kiss, A., Horvth, L. (1991): Nhny gondolat a trszemllet fejlesztsrl, Szombathelyi
Berzsenyi Dniel Tanrkpz Fiskola Tudomnyos Kzlemnyei, VIII. Mdszertani dolgozatok,
Szombathely
Krteszi, F. (1972): A geometriatants korszerstsrl, Tanknyvkiad, Budapest
Kirby, J. R., Boulter, D. R. (1997): Spatial ability and transformational geometry, Paper presented at
the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Athens, p.11
Kosztolnyi, J. (2003): Tanmenet, Mozaik Kiad, Szeged
Kosztolnyi, J. (2000): Tantrgyi tanterv a kerettanterv alapjn kszl helyi tantervekhez. Mate-
matika 912. vfolyam, Mozaik Kiad, Szeged
 THE SPATIAL ABILITY AND SPATIAL GEOMETRICAL KNOWLEDGE 25

Lord, T. R. (1985): Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students, Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 22(5), 395405
Maier, P. H. (1998): Spatial geometry and spatial ability How to make solid geometry solid? In
Elmar Cohors-Fresenborg, K. Reiss, G. Toener, and H.-G. Weigand, editors, Selected Papers
from the Annual Conference of Didactics of Mathematics 1996, Osnabrueck, p. 6375
Sra, L., Krpti, A., Gulys, J. (2002): A trszemllet, Comenius Kiad, Pcs
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2001): Importance of assessing spatial ability in
intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study, Journal of Educational
Psychology, 93, 604614
Sk-Lnyi, C., Lnyi, Zs., Tilinger, . (2003): Using Virtual Reality to Improve Space and Depth
Perception, Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 291303
Szmad, L., Bkssy, Sz. (2002): tmutat s tanmenetjavaslat, Nemzeti Tanknyvkiad, Budapest
Tompa, K. (2001): A matematika rettsgi eredmnyeinek elemzse, Iskolakultra, 2001/9
Uebn osnovy gymnzia tvorron tdium, Ministerstvo kolstva Slovenskej republiky, slo
155/99 41, Bratislava, (1999)
Uebn osnovy gymnzia osemron tdium, Ministerstvo kolstva Slovenskej republiky, slo
1797/97-15, Bratislava (1997)
Urbn, J. (2004): Tanmenet, Mozaik Kiad, Szeged
Vancs . (2005): Tanmenet, Mszaki Knyvkiad, Budapest
Vsrhelyi .: A geometriai trszemllet fejlesztse dinamikus geometriai programmal,
http://ikon.inf.elte.hu/~kid/ELEMIMAT/BLOKK2003/terszemlelet/TERSZEML.HTML
Vsrhelyi .: A vizulis reprezentci fontossga a matematikaoktatsban
http://ikon.inf.elte.hu/ ~kid/ELEMIMAT/BLOKK2003/vizualis/VIZUALIS.HTML
Vincze I. (2001): Tanmenet, Mozaik Kiad, Szeged

GNES BOSNYK, Selye J. University, Ronckej koly 1519, 94501 Komrno, Slovakia
E-mail: matlak_agi@yahoo.com

RITA NAGY-KONDOR, University Of Debrecen, P.O. Box 11, H-4011 Debrecen, Hungary
E-mail: rita@mfk.unideb.hu