Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
569
569
1/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
570
2/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
571
3/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
572
4/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
573
573
5/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
574
6/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
575
7/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
estoppel.
6.The dismissal of the complaint by the Honorable Court
of Appeals amounts to grave abuse of discretion amounting
to lack and excess of jurisdiction and a complete defiance of
the doctrine of primacy of substantive justice over strict
application of technical rules.
7.The Honorable Court of Appeals gravely and seriously
erred in not affirming the decision of the Court a quo that
the Deed of Donation is void.[9]
576
576
8/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
577
9/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
[11] 422 Phil. 222, 230 370 SCRA 638, 643644 (2001).
[12] 481 Phil. 168, 180 437 SCRA 565, 573574 (2004).
578
578
10/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
579
579
11/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
580
580
12/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
citing Catorce v. Court of Appeals, 214 Phil. 181 129 SCRA 210 (1984).
581
581
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000014f8f66847115762249000a0094004f00ee/p/ANQ277/?username=Guest
13/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
582
14/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
583
15/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
584
16/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
585
17/18
9/3/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME713
Copyright2015CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000014f8f66847115762249000a0094004f00ee/p/ANQ277/?username=Guest
18/18