Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
versus
ment of Transfer
For:
Annul
xxx; Etc.
Defendants.
x---------------------------------------------x
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
(Rule on Judicial Affidavit,
A.M. No. 12-8-8-12, September 4, 2012)
I.
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION.
:
:
:
:
:
IRENE xxx
xxx;
xxx St., xxx, Rizal;
Housewife;
English and Tagalog.
Address
:
LASERNA CUEVA-MERCADER LAW
OFFICES, Unit 15, Star Arcade, C.V. Starr Ave., Philamlife Village, Las Pinas Ci
ty 1740.
Place of Examination: LASERNA CUEVA-MERCADER LAW OFFICES,
Law Offices, Unit 15, Star Arcade, C.V. Starr Ave., Philamlife Village, Las Pina
s City 1740.
II.
OFFER.
The testimony of the witness Irene Xxx-Xxx is being offered to prove the:
1.
2.
The questioned land title in the name of the defendant covering the subj
ect property;
3.
;
The antecedent land titles of the questioned land title of the defendant
4.
es;
The legal history of the antecedent and the current/questioned land titl
5.
ty;
6.
The identities of the predecesors-in-interest/decedents of the said lega
l heirs/plaintiffs;
7.
III.
I, IRENE XXX, xxx years old, married, Filipino, and residing at xxx St., xxx, Ri
zal, under oath, depose:
Q
Please state your name, age, residence, and occupation of the witness.
A
I am IRENE XXX-XXX, 51 years old, married,
residing at xxx St., xxx, Rizal, and a Housewife.
Q- Why are you here now?
A To give a sworn statement by way of a judicial affidavit, the
same to constitute as my direct testimony, in the above-captioned
civil case.
QFor the record, please state the name and address of the
Lawyer who is now conducting or supervising your examination and the place
where the examination is being held now?
A The legal counsel for the plaintiffs, Atty. Manuel J. Laserna Jr.,
is conducting or supervising my examination now at his law office
(Laserna Cueva-Mercader Law Offices) located at:
Unit 15, Star Arcade, C.V. Starr Ave., Philamlife Village,
Las Pinas City 1740.
Q
A
e testimony or perjury?
A -Yes.
6.
Q
Let us now proceed to the Complaint. Do you know the
plaintiffs Heirs of (the deceased) Sps. Serafin Xxx and Luz Xxx-Xxx (Heirs of the
Sps. Xxx) , namely:
a.
b.
Ken Jeffer
son Xxx,
ii.
Kate Jennely
n Xxx,
iii.
Katty Jane Xx
iv.
Kris Jennifer
x, and
Xxx?
A
7.
Q
Do you the plaintiffs
Xxx-Xxx and Serafin Xxx , namely:
a.
b.
A -
Yes.
Yes.
Q -
a.
Annulment of Transfer of Certificate of Title No. xxx registered in the
name of defendant LEONORA XXX ( Xxx ), and all persons acting under her authority,
covering a parcel of land located in Barrio Balimbing, Municipality of Xxx, Riz
al ( subject property );
b.
Accion Reivindicatoria or recovery of the ownership of the subject prope
rty from defendant XXX and persons acting under her authority in favor of XXX RE
SORT as the BUYER of the subject property from the plaintiffs;
c.
Recovery of the possession of the subject property from defendant XXX a
nd persons acting under her authority in favor of XXX RESORT as the BUYER of the
subject property from the plaintiffs;
d.
DAMAGES based on the provisions of ABUSE OF RIGHT (pursuant to Article
s 19 and 20 of the Civil Code) and TORT or QUASI DELICT and TORT/DAMAGES (pursu
ant to Article 2176 and the damages provisions of the Civil Code).
11. Q case?
Are you familiar with the real property subject matter of this
The wife of Juez Manuel Xxx was the deceased Pelagia R. Xxx.
The late Juez Manuel Xxx and the late Pelagia Xxx were lawfully married to each
other on xxx, 1924 in Xxx, Rizal.
16. Q
property?
18. Q
A -
Yes. Serafin Xxx married Luz Xxx on xxx, 1952 in Cardona, Rizal.
A The legal heirs of Serafin Xxx heirs were his widow Luz Xxx Vda de Xxx
and their two (2) children Josefina Xxx and Jose Manuel Xxx.
25. Q
How did the legal heirs of the deceased Serafin Xxx
partition his estate?
A
The parcel of land covered by
registered in the name of Serafin Xxx,
quare meters, was subsequently divided
(3) titles, in the names of Luz Vda De
l Xxx
1/3, to wit:
a.
Luz Vda. De Xxx - TCT No. xxx with an area of xxx square meters (represe
nting her conjugal share plus her legitime from the estate of her deceased husba
nd Serafin Xxx);
b.
Josefina Xxx - TCT No. xxx with an area of xxx square meters (representi
ng her legitime from the estate of her deceased father Sarafin Xxx); and
c.
Jose Manuel Xxx - TCT No. xxx with an area of xxx square meters (repres
enting his legitime from the estate of her deceased father Sarafin Xxx).
The Plan of Subdivision Survey made for the estate of the deceased Serafin Xxx (
TCT No.xxx) was made by Private Land Surveyor Julian B. Santos in 1959.
26. Q - Are you familiar with the parcel of land covered TCT
e name of Luz Vda. De Xxx, the widow of Serafin Xxx?
No. xxx in th
A
Yes. It is a parcel of land described as Lot 1 of the subdivision
plan (LRC), Psd-xxx; being a portion of the parcel of land described on plan Sixxx, LRC (GLRO) Rec. No. (Sales Patent), situated in the Barrio of Balimbing, Mu
nicipality of Xxx, Province of Rizal, with an area of xxx SQUARE METERS, more or
less.
27. Q
When Serafin Xxx died in 1958, how old were his
children Josefina Xxx and Jose Manuel Xxx.
A At the time of the death of Serafin Xxx in 1958, his two (2) surviving
children, namely, Josefina Xxx and Jose Manuel Xxx, were still both minors.
Josefina Xxx was born on xxx, 1954 and she was only over three (3) years old whe
n her Father Serafin Xxx died.
Jose Manuel Xxx was born on xxx, 1957 and he was only slightly over one (1) year
old when his father Serafin Xxx died.
28. Q - Do you know the deceased Gregoria Xxx?
A Yes. Gregoria Xxx Xxx was an aunt of Josefina
Xxx and Jose Manuel Xxx.
29. Q
What is the relation of Gregoria Xxx Xxx to the
subject property subject matter of this case?
A During the lifetime of the deceased Gregoria Xxx Xxx
she caused the execution of three (3) simulated and void
Deeds of Absolute Sale covering the parcel of land registered
under TCT No. xxx with an area of xxx square
meters, to wit:
a.
Deed of Absolute Sale, dated xxx, 1974, allegedly executed by Luz Xxx Vd
a De Xxx in favor of Gregoria Xxx Xxx for Pxxx covering her one-third share on t
he parcel of land covered by TCT No. xxx.
b.
Deed of Absolute Sale, dated xxx, 1977, allegedly executed by Josefina X
xx in favor of Gregoria Xxx Xxx for Pxxx covering her one-third share on the pa
rcel of land covered by TCT No. xxx.
c.
Deed of Absolute Sale, dated xxx, 1979, allegedly executed by Jose Manu
el Xxx in favor of Gregoria Xxx Xxx for Pxxx covering his one-third share on the
parcel of land covered by TCT No. xxx.
30. Q
Why do you say that the said three (3) deeds of sale (c. 1974, 1977,
and 1979) were void and simulated?
A - The reasons are as follows based on our family records:
a.
The alleged signature of Luz Vda De Xxx on the alleged Deed of Absolute
Sale, dated XXX, 1974 was not the true signature of Luz Xxx Vda De Xxx.
Thus, the alleged signature of Luz Xxx Vda De Xxx was a forgery.
The said Deed of Absolute Sale is NULL and VOID ab initio and INEFFECTIVE for la
ck of consent.
b.
Moreover, the alleged consideration of Pxxx for the sale of the 1/3 shar
e of Luz Xxx Vda De Xxx on the parcel of land under TCT No. xxx was not paid by
Gregoria Xxx Xxx.
The said Deed of Absolute Sale is rendered NULL and VOID ab initio and INEFFECTI
VE for lack of consideration.
c.
The alleged signature of Jose Manuel Xxx on the alleged Deed of Absolut
e Sale, dated xxx, 1979 IS NOT the signature of Jose Manuel Xxx.
Thus, the said alleged signature of Jose Manuel Xxx was a forgery.
The said Deed of Absolute Sale is NULL and VOID ab initio and INEFFECTIVE for la
ck of consent.
d.
Further, the alleged consideration of Pxxx for the sale of the 1/3 share
of Jose Manuel Xxx in the land covered by TCT No. xxx was not paid by Gregoria
Xxx Xxx.
The said Deed of Absolute Sale is rendered NULL and VOID ab initio and INEFFECTI
VE for lack of consideration.
e.
The signature of Josefina Xxx on the Deed of Absolute Sale, dated xxx, 1
977 WAS NOT VOLUNTARILY AFFIXED by her as she was INFLUENCED (and was not in a p
osition to decline) to sign the same by her aunt Gregoria Xxx.
The said Deed of Absolute Sale is NULL and VOID ab initio and INEFFECTIVE for la
ck of consent.
f.
Moreover, the alleged consideration of Pxxx for the sale of the 1/3 sh
are of Josefina Xxx on the parcel of land under TCT No. xxx was not paid by Greg
oria Xxx Xxx.
The said Deed of Absolute Sale is rendered NULL and VOID ab initio and INEFFECTI
VE for lack of consideration.
31. Q
A
Based on the aforecited three (3) Deeds of Absolute Sale,
TCT No. xxx was issued in the name of Gregoria Xxx
Xxx by the Registry of Deeds of the Province of Rizal on
December 9, 1980.
Subsequently, the TCT No. M-xxx was issued on xxx, 1981 by the Registry of Deeds
of the Province of Rizal in the name of the defendant Leonora Xxx, a niece of
Gregoria Xxx Xxx, based on a deed of sale executed by Gregoria Xxx Xxx in favor
of the defendant Xxx on xxx, 1979.
It was annotated at the back of TCT No. xxx on xxx, 1981 as Entry No. xxx.
32. Q Why are you running after the defendant Xxx for
the subject property?
A
We, the plaintiffs, are running after the defendant Xxx in
this case because the legal defects in the title of Gregoria
Xxx Xxx under TCT No. xxx were transferred
to the defendant Xxx as the transferee of Gregoria
Xxx Xxx.
We believe that the parcel of land covered
by TCT No. xxx still belongs to Luz Xxx Vda De
Xxx, Josefina Xxx and Jose Manuel Xxx.
33. Q- Did Luz Xxx Vda Xxx (Luz Xxx) remarry?
A-
Yes. She entered into a second marriage with Serafin Xxx on xxx, 1960.
34. Q children?
A
Yes. They had two (2) children, namely, myself, Irene O.
Xxx, married to Jose J. Xxx, and my sister Yvette O.
Xxx.
35. Q - Where is Jose Manuel Xxx now?
A
36. Q
Who are the legal heirs of the deceased Jose Manuel Xxx?
A The late Jose Manuel Xxx was survived by his four (4)
children, namely:
(1) Ken Jefferson Xxx,
(2) Kate Jennelyn
Xxx,
(3) Katty Jane Xxx, and
(4) Kris Jennifer Xxx. They
are co-plaintiffs in this case.
37. Q
A
38. Q
Who were the legal heirs of Luz Xxx-Xxx (Luz Vda. De Xxx)?
A.
a.
b.
c.
Her children from her second marriage: Myself, Irene Xxx-Xxx; and Yvett
e Xxx.
39. Q Where is Serafin Xxx (second husband of the widow Luz Xxx-Xxx [Luz Vda. De
Xxx])now?
A
a.
b.
a.
The annulment of TCT No. xxx registered in the name of defendant LEONORA
XXX.
b.
The recovery of the ownership (accion reinvindicatoria) of the subject p
roperty from defendant LEONORA XXX (and those acting under her authority) in fav
or of co-plaintiff XXX RESORT, INC. as the BUYER of the subject property from th
e plaintiffs Heirs of Sps. Serafin Xxx and Luz Xxx-Xxx.
c.
The recovery of the possession of the subject property from defendant L
EONORA XXX (and those acting under her authority) in favor of XXX RESORT, INC.
as the BUYER of the subject property from the plaintiffs Heirs of Sps. Serafin X
xx and Luz Xxx-Xxx.
d.
The award of the following damages based on the provisions of ABUSE OF
RIGHT and TORT or QUASI DELICT, pursuant to Articles 19 and 20 (abuse or right)
in relation to Articles 2176
(tort/quasi delict) and Title XVIII ( Damages ) of
the Civil Code, to wit:
d.1. Moral damages in the amount of P500,000.00 in favor of the lead plaintiffs
Heirs of the Sps. Xxx for their physical suffering, mental anguish, fright, seri
ous anxiety, besmirched reputation, wounded feelings, moral shock and social hu
miliation of the lead plaintiffs Heirs of the Sps. Xxx;
d.2. Exemplary damages in the amount of P500,000.00 in favor of the lead plaint
iffs Heirs of the Sps. Xxx by way of example or to serve as correction for the
public good.
d.3. Attorneys fees in the amount of Pxxx as acceptance fees for the legal servi
ces of the Laserna Cueva-Mercader & Associates Law Offices as the Legal Counsel
of XXX RESORT, INC., plus appearance fee per hearing in the amount of Pxxx per
hearing;
d.4. Litigation costs in the amount of P100,000.00;
d.5. Costs of suit.
44. Q
A
We hereby reiterate our EX PARTE MOTION TO INSTRUCT THE BRANCH CLERK OF COURT
TO MARK THE COMMON EXHIBITS , dated xxx, 2015, and support of our earlier EX PARTE
MANIFESTATION (ADOPTION OF SELECTED DEFENDANT S EXHIBITS AS PLAINTIFFS COMMON EXHIB
ITS) , dated xxx, 2015, we, by counsel, manifested to the Court that we were ADOPT
ING as COMMON EXHIBITS the following exhibits previously introduced by the defen
dant Xxx which were attached to the Judicial Affidavit of the first witness for
the defendant Xxx in the person of LIGAYA xxx, to wit:
X x x.
1.
As Exhs. A to A-5 for the plaintiffs - Exh. 1 to 1-E of the Xxx judicial a
vit, i.e., TCT No. M-xxx, with submarkings, including the last page entitled Mem
orandum of Encumbrances.
2.
As Exhs. B to B-4 for the plaintiffs - Exh. 2 to 2-B of the xxx judicial af
it, i.e., DEED OF ASSIGNMENT executed by GREGORIA XXX, with submarkings.
3.
As Exh. C to C-3 for the plaintiffs - Exh.
t, i.e., TCT NO. M-xxx, with submarkings.
to
3-C
4.
As Exh. D to D-1 for the plaintiffs - Exh.
ial affidavit, i.e., TCT NO. xxx, with submarkings.
to
4-(not legible)
of the Xxx
5.
As Exh. E for the plaintiffs - Exh. 5 of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e., D
EED OF ABSOLUTE SALE executed by LUZ XXX VDA. DE XXX, consisting of one (1) page
.
6.
As Exh. F for the plaintiffs - Exh. 6 of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e., D
EED OF ABSOLUTE SALE executed by JOSE MANUEL XXX, consisting of one (1) page.
7.
As Exh. G for the plaintiffs - Exh. 7 of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e., D
EED OF ABSOLUYE SALE executed by JOSEFINA XXX, consisting of one (1) page.
8.
As Exh. H for the plaintiffs - Exh. 8
of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e.,
CERTIFICATION dated xxx, 2014, of the National Archives of the Philippines, cons
isting of one (1) page.
9.
As Exh. I for the plaintiffs - Exh. 9
of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e.,
CERTIFICATION dated xxx, 2014, of the National Archives of the Philippines, con
sisting of one (1) page.
10. As Exh. J for the plaintiffs - Exh. 10
of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e., C
ERTIFICATION dated xxx, 2014, of the National Archives of the Philippines, consi
sting of one (1) page.
11. As Exh. K to K-11 for the plaintiffs - Exh. 16 to 16-FF of the Xxx judicial
avit, i.e., VARIOUS OFFICIAL RECEIPTS FOR PAYMENTS OF LOCAL REAL ESTATE TAXES is
sued to Defendant LEONORA V. XXX (marked as Exhs. 16 to 16-Z for the Defense) and is
sued to xxx DEV. CORP. (marked as Exhs. 16-AA to 16-FF for the Defense).
12. As Exh. L to L-1 for the plaintiffs - Exh. 16-GG to 16-JJ of the Xxx judicial
avit, i.e., TAX DECLARATION NO. xxx (Exh. 16-GG , etc.) and TAX DECLARATION NO. xxx
(Exh. 16-II , etc.), consisting of two (2) pages.
13. As Exh. M for the plaintiffs - Exh. 19 of the Xxx judicial affidavit, i.e., to
pographical map showing the location of LOT NO. 1 (LRC) PSD
xxx, A (area) = xxx
sq. m., M-xxx.
X x x.
45. Q
A I hereby introduce, for marking purposes, the following exhibits which were al
ready attached to the Complaint as Annexes A to JJ thereof.
I ask that they be marked as Exhs. N
kings in the Complaint. To wit:
to
hereof
hereof
hereof
Tax Declaration No
hereof - Certificate of
hereof - Certificate of T
hereof - Negative Marria
hereof
Certificate of Dea
hereof
Certificate of Dea
hereof
Notarial page of t
hereof
hereof
Marriage Contract
AA
BB hereof
Certificate of Bi
CC hereof
Certificate of Liv
hereof
Certificate of D
Plan of Subdivisi
KK hereof
MM hereof
OO
hereof
Certificate of Li
Certificate of Li
PP hereof - Certificate of
hereof
Certificate of L
RR
hereof
Certificate of Li
SS
hereof
Certificate of L
TT
UU
hereof
Negative Certifi
VV
hereof
Negative Certifi
hereof
Certificate of
Annex II in the Complaint, the same to be marked as Exh. WW hereof - Deed of Extraj
udicial Partition; with Deed of Absolute Sale; Waiver of Rights; and Special Po
wer of Attorney; dated xxx, 2012; between the Heirs of Sps. Serafin Xxx and Heir
Serafin Xxx.
Annex JJ in the Complaint, the same to be marked as Exh. XX hereof - SPA of Josefi
na Xxx and Jose Xxx, as attorneys-in-fact of the above-named lead plaintiffs .
46. Q
Anything else?
I hereby introduce the following additional exhibits to prove the forgery, lack
of consideration, and lack of consent of Luz Xxx Vda. De Xxx, Jose Manuel Xxx, a
nd Josefina O. Xxx regarding the void and simulated 1974, 1977 and 1979 deeds of
sale that they executed in favor of Gregoria Xxx, to wit:
a)
Exh. YY
Kasulatan Ng Sanglaan Ng Labing Dalawang (12) Puno Ng Mangga , dated x
xx 1964, executed by Luz Xxx.
It shows the true signature of Luz Xxx.
b)
Exh. ZZ
Yes.
I hereby manifest that during the main trial of the merits of this case, we, the
plaintiffs, intend to file a motion for questioned document and handwriting exa
mination by the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) of all questioned documen
ts and signatures involved in this case, as discussed above.
I further manifest that, during the trial on the merits of this case, we intend
to present additional corroborating witnesses to prove our claims and prayers i
n the Complaint.
49. Q
Why did it take you and your co-plaintiffs more than 30 years before you f
iled a case in court against the defendant Xxx to assert your rights in the subj
ect property?
A We did not have the financial resources and the clout to launch a legal fight
against the rich and influential Xxx Family to recover the subject property.
When we sold our rights and interest in the subject property to Xxx Resort, Inc.
three (3) years ago that was the only time we acquired the necessary resources
and courage to commence this action with the support.
Furthermore, the said delay should not be taken against us.
We believe that a void and simulated contract, as in this case, is invalid ab in
itio and that the action to nullify it is imprescriptible under the Civil Code a
nd existing jurisprudence, hence, as far as we are concerned, the defense of lac
hes is inapplicable.
Nothing Follows.
X x x City, xxx, 2015.
IRENE A. XXX
Affiant/Co-Plaintiff
SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me in xxx City on xxx ____, 2015, aff
iant showing his/her competent proof of identity, to wit: Comelec VIN xxx.
Notary Public
Doc. No. __
Page No. __
Book No. __
Series of 2015.
IV.
to Exh.
AAA , supra.
V.
SWORN ATTESTATION OF THE LAWYER WHO CONDUCTED OR SUPERVISED TH
E EXAMINATION OF THE WITNESS.
The undersigned ATTY. MANUEL J. LASERNA JR., of legal age, married, and with law
office address are Laserna Cueva-Mercader Law Offices, Unit 15, Star Arcade, C.
V. Starr Ave., Philamlife Village, Las Pinas City 1740, under oath, deposes and
states:
1.
2.
He faithfully recorded or caused to be recorded the questions h
e asked and the corresponding answers that the above-named witness gave;
3.
Neither he nor any other person then present or assisting him coached th
e witness regarding the latter's answers; and
4.
He conducted the examination of the witness at his law office located at
Laserna Cueva-Mercader Law Offices, Unit 15, Star Arcade, C.V. Starr Ave., Phi
lamlife Village, Las Pinas City 1740.
xxx City, xxx, 2015.