International Relations Definition

One can better define International Relations if one clarifies in which aspect it is required to
be defined. International Relations is beyond a comprehensive definition because of its
multidimensional approaches. Scholars however devised their own kinds of definitions
depicting the sense in which they take IR. As Palmer and Perkins used these words to define
IR;
"International Relations is the objective and systematic study of international life in all its
aspects."
This is a relatively general definition yet beyond the width of International Relations as a
discipline.
Central Point of all Efforts made to define International Relations
In nearly all definitions proposed for International Relations, scholars share one point in
common that works as the central idea behind this discipline. That idea is of 'nation states'
and the relationships between them.
IR in its very first sense name of the relationships between the nation states of the world.
The internationality is subject matter of the discipline. Modern nation state system evolved
from the Peace of Westphalia Treaty signed in 1648. Today, in the complex structure of
world states working on varying ideologies, International Relations helps to study them in a
unanimity of thought.
Scope of International Relations
Another merit as well as demerit of this discipline is that it has no boundaries of its scope. It
is merit in the sense of provision of absolute opportunity to man to make research on the
daily changing international relations. It is demerit as the discipline fails to give itself a
concrete shape and outline. But still keeping in view the aspects studied in the International
Relations till now, we will try to elaborate its scope. Following points will prove helpful in this
regard;
IR studies relations between states in their political and economic prospects primarily.
IR covers the realm of 'foreign affairs' in all its dimensions.
IR deals with the recording and studying of International History with the aim to find out
the basis of states' relations in the past.
IR studies International Law in the context of how international rules define and govern
the relations between states.
IR embodies its scope with the inclusion of not only states but also the non-state actors in
international relations.
IR deals with the international events of;
War
Peace
Nuclear world
International political economy
Globalization
International institutions
Conflicts among states
Foreign policy and decision making
National powers and interests

Conclusion
International Relations has a wider scope. The points elaborated above as its scope are not
final. This discipline broadens its scope with the changing events of the world and new
dynamics of international relations. It is a subject along with being a practical course
adopted by nations of the world and the international institutions.
The Nation State System
Modern world is the world hosting nation state system. This system in its very basic sense
ensures the origin of states on the world map. And the relationships among these states are
to be regulated by internationally agreed set of rules. This nation state system is child of
political and social evolution of the world that commenced with the birth of social animal on
this planet.
What is Nation State System?
Palmer defines nation state system in these words; "Nation State System is a pattern of
political life which organizes people separately into sovereign states".
Elements of a Nation State
Every nation state of the world is to possess four essential elements in order to prove its
recognition. These elements are;
Population as a nation
Definite territory for that population to live in
A government to govern that population with the defined territory
Sovereignty of that nation state
Origin of Nation State System
Origin of the modern nation state system can be traced back into 1648 when the Peace
Treaty of Westphalia was signed. This treaty was actually an agreement to end the 'Thirty
Years of War' from 1618 to 1648 between various religio - political factions of the landmass
Europe.
Prior to signing of this treaty various religious sects of Christian Europe were at daggers
drawn at one hand and there was dreadful clash between the Church and the Throne on the
other hand.
With the Peace of Westphalia drawn in 1648, for the first time in human history,
independent sovereign territories were defined to be ruled by the nations living in them.
This was a way to end the long war and it proved quite effective.
Modern Nation State System
Europe became the birthplace of the contemporary nation state system. Though it was not
in this position at that time but with the time passing it evolved. Today, the nation state
system shapes an international community to discuss and deal with the affairs between
them.
Today, the nation state system is complex than ever. Not only the states are the prominent
actors as in the past but also the non-state actors occupy their place. Nation state system of
present day is however more concrete but still victim of various international problems.
Future of Nation State System
There can never be one state of the whole world as nations hesitate to lose their distinct
identities. Nation state system will continue in the future of this world with any rare chance
of being replaced. It is system that if not perfect then at least better than its previous
versions.

Further, nations have learned to govern themselves and their states. They have established
international community, international peace making institution and international law as
well. Thus, it is a relatively better system.
Conclusion
Nation state system is the framework in which modern political world acts. It has more
evolved and developed mechanisms of conduct with each other. Nation states become the
basis of studying International Relations as well both in terms of a discipline as well as in
terms of a mechanism.
Evolution of International Society
Nation state system provided the fundamental unity for giving this world an international
society. This society of states faced various phases of peace and war to evolve into its
contemporary shape. Today, international society is more powerful and strong under the
shadow of international law than it was ever before in the past. Conflicts and frictions in the
relations among states however undermine the concreteness of international society at
different levels of interaction.
What is International Society?
International society can be defined as 'community of world states gathered under an
agenda that may be in the shape of international law at a universal organization in order to
sort out the ways for achieving common goals and averting common threats thus primarily
fulfilling the aim of a peaceful world'.
Elements shaping International Society
The definition carries following elements that establish an international society;
Nation states
International organization
International law
Common Agenda
Aim for world peace
Origin of International Society
Evolution of international community can be studied after knowing its origin. It was the
Peace of Westphalia of 1648 that actually laid the formal structure of nation states.
Establishment of an international community was possible not before that. Thus, nation
states became the first element of international community.
Nation states of the world plunged into the First World War in 1914. At the end of this war,
the first ever time came in history when the idea of an international community was
materialized. Following the proposition of the then American President Wilson, the League of
Nations was established as an apparent body of international society.
Evolution of International Society
Evolution of international society began with the birth of the League of Nations after the
First World War. The league became the first platform where the member states could
debate over the international problems. But soon after the Great Depression of 1930s, the
League became the victim of nationalism and state - centrism. This undermined the
evolution of international society. World put itself into another Great War from 1939 to
1945. This was a period which might or might not be taken as evolutionary phase of
international community. But in a compact view, World War Two ended bringing the nation
states closer again in order to revive this interrupted evolution of international society. At

that moment another international organization with the name of the 'United Nations' (UN)
was established.
UN survives even today after having passed through the bumpy decades of the Cold War
between the US and the USSR. The organization represents an international society with the
gathering of 192 states as its members.
UN & the Evolution of International Society
In the contemporary state of affairs, the evolution of international society can be seen and
assessed in terms of the evolution of the UN.
The UN as universal body of nation states pledges for the world peace and to avoid any
possibilities that might lead the world into another major conflict.
International society today has evolved to discuss and deal with the modern day problems
of global climate change, nuclear non-proliferation and so on. It is dealing with the issues of
regional and civil conflicts as well to prevent them from escalation. As has been the case
with Libya and Syria today where UN interfered to stop the wars.
Conclusion
From the origin of nation state system to the establishment of the League of Nations and
then its successor the United Nations, International Society is endeavoring in one way or the
other to infuse more rational ways to deal with the global problems and global crisis. The
community faces dilemmas and debacles in their efforts but overall prevent the world
system from disintegrating.
International Relations Theoretical Approaches
Theories are the academic basis of any discipline of social science. International Relations
being a discipline is studied in different theoretical approaches. It has varying approaches
because of different perspectives in which its subject matter is studied by the scholars. All
interpret the postulates of International Relations mostly not in a common way. Among the
theoretical approaches of the IR:
Liberalism or Idealism
Liberalism or Idealism comes first in terms of its formal origin.
Realism
Realism comes first in terms of its strong realistic postulates.
Neo-Realism
Neo-Realism comes as a refined form of the aboriginal Realism.
Neo - Liberalism
Neo - Liberalism takes re-birth years after the failure of idealism.
World System Theory
World System Theory advances itself from the traditional theories of International Relations,
and
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory brings forth the new and utopian ideas related to suppressed role of women
in International Relations.
Liberalism and Idealism
What is Liberalism?
Liberalism as its name denotes, is a theory that defies the traditional and conservative style

of observing International Relations. It is a theory that basically emphasizes upon the need
of liberal thought and openness while maintaining international relations.
What is Idealism?
Idealism is nothing different from liberalism. It is part of the Liberal Approach which denotes
a specific period of time in the world history following the First World War when the Liberal
made an abortive effort to give this world an ideal system regulating the international
relations. Idealism is also called 'Utopianism'.
Proponents of Liberalism & Idealism
Among the classic and modern proponents of Idealism and liberalism come the following
names;
Immanuel Kant
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
John Locke
These above mentioned names were of classic scholars. The modern scholars included;
Alferd Zimmern
Norman Angell
Woodrow Wilson
Fundamental Points of Liberal Approach in IR
The fundamental principles devised by the Liberal Approach in International Relations can be
studied in following points;
It is instinct of human being to cooperate for mutual welfare.
Evil is an exceptional case in the Human nature.
States in a similar context tend to cooperate in international affairs as they are governed
by rational men.
War cannot be eradicated however with mutual cooperation it can be reduced to the
minimum possible level.
There shall be promoted international harmony with the help of a global institute working
to maintain the world peace.
Origin of Liberalism
Liberalism was actually founded after the chaotic World War One. It was the wish of the
nation states to cooperate in order to eliminate war of this destructive level. Former
American President Woodrow Wilson gave his historic 14 points to bring peace into the post
- war world. He in the last of his points gave the idea of establishing an international
organization that was materialized in the form of the 'League of Nations'.
Criticism on Liberal & Ideal Approach
Liberalism and its more ambitious faction Idealism are criticized for utterly rejecting the
realist basis of international relations. They are criticized for forwarding the utopian and
impracticable schemes of regulating the relations between the states.
Failure of Liberalism?
Liberalism if not utterly failed then at least received a blow when the League met failure and
world plunged into World War Two. The utopian scheme could not prevent the nationalistic
tendencies of the League's former members from disrupting the world order.
Conclusion
Liberalism is among the classic theoretical approaches of the International Relations. The

theory carries massive support for its liberal and peaceful modes of regulating the
international relations. However, it is criticized for its failure to prevent the world from
another great war with its utopian schemes.

Realism
Realism is the approach of International Relations that works as anti - thesis to Liberalism.
Realism focuses on the more realistic, power oriented and state centric principles that play
important role in international relations. Realism lays emphasis upon gaining national power
to pursue national interests at all costs.
Proponents of Realism Approach
Among the classic proponents of Realism, also regarded as its founders, following names
fall;
Nicolo Machiavelli
Thomas Hobbes
Clausewitz
Modern scholars that favor Realism as a better approach in International Relations are;
Hans Morgenthau
George F. Kenan
E. H. Carr
Origin of Realism as Approach of International Relations
Formal origin and incorporation of Realism as an approach in the International Relations was
seen at the end of the Second World War. Liberalism failed in all its utopian schemes to
bring peace to the world. States fought another Total War. Following that the approach of
Realism sought grounds. If seen in the distant past, Realism finds its origin in writings of
Machiavelli as well as Thomas Hobbes.
Fundamental Postulates of Realism
Following were the fundamental postulates drafted by various scholars under the umbrella
of Realism;
There exists international anarchy.
States are the principal actors in international relations.
States pursue national interests.
States tend to accumulate national power.
States strengthen the means of their survivals.
National power and national interests determine the relations between states.
States need to compete each other for seeking relative gains in the international realm.
War is an option in the international relations.
Realism and Six Principles of Hans Morgenthau
Hans Morgenthau's Six principles of Realism are taken as eminent work in this field of
International Relations. His six principles give the ideas of;
National power
State centrism
National interests
Autonomy

 Survival
Beyond morality approach of state
Criticism on Realism as Theoretical Approach of International Relations
Realism is criticized for its extreme emphasis on state centrism, power grabbing and
national interests at the costs of world peace. The theory is realistic but leads the world
states into an anarchic position where everyone is at war against the other. It does not
eliminate war as an option in the international relations.
Conclusion
International Relations seeks Realism as among the influential classical approaches. Realism
talks about the aboriginal and realistic basis of international relations. It is criticized for its
extreme version but the theory completely rejects the utopian postulates of idealism.
Realism does not take cooperation as an option because according to its proponents, world
is anarchic where intense competition is inevitable to maintain national power.
Neo-Realism
'Neo' means new or the latest. Neo-Realism is more refined and advanced strand of
Realism. Neo-Realism unlike the original Realism is more moderate form in International
Relations.
Origin of Neo-Realism
Neo-Realism originated in latter part of 1970s. It was the reactionary product of NeoLiberalism which once again posed serious threat to the Realist idea of state centrism. It
was the work of Kenneth Waltz with the title of 'Theory of International Politics' which gave
birth to neo-realism.
Exponent of Neo-Realism
Among the modern exponents of neo-realism the name of Kenneth Waltz echoes. He is
regarded as founder of this theoretical approach in the International Relations. Waltz
sticking to the traditional ideas of Realism, infuses a new spirit in this approach by not
utterly rejecting the possibilities of cooperation among the states of the world.
Postulates of Neo-Realism
Postulates of new-realism are the same as that of realism. They differ in a few points which
are explained as following;
There exists international anarchy which serves as basis of international relations rather
than the Human nature of violence.
World states follow the idea of self - help to empower themselves and act in international
relations.
There exists Security Dilemma in international relations. States accumulate power for
their security and survival which leads most of them into a race of armament and
militarization.
Possibilities of cooperation between the states need not to be overlooked when they are
serving the interests of a state.
It is not the cooperation however but the 'Balance of Power' that actually prevent the
states from large scale war.
Criticism on Neo-Realism Theory of International Relations
Neo-Realism is criticized on the account of following points;

 Still the theory is extreme and regards state as the sole actors of international relations.
It admits cooperation now but it has not yet rejected war as an option.
Focuses on national power and national interests of a state which actually undermine the
possibilities for cooperation.
The theory of Neo-Realism gives a mixed vision not a clear cut one. It is not inclined on a
single side.
Conclusion
Neo-Realism is actually the reaction to the action posed by Neo-Liberalism. The theory has
not given up the basic postulates of Realism but it is still moderate as compared to its
original version. Neo-Realism is brainchild of Kenneth Waltz who believed neither in extreme
liberalism not in extreme realism. As a consequence, he devised a middle way to meet the
ideals in international relations.
Neo-Liberalism
Neo-liberalism emerged to be the modern strand of liberalism in the realm of theoretical
International Relations. This approach just like its previous aboriginal strand believes in
rationality of human nature and international cooperation. But unlike its aboriginal form,
neo-liberalism is moderate and less extreme.
Origin of Neo-Liberalism as Theoretical Approach in IR
Origin of neo-liberalism in International Relations was both the result of changing world
circumstances and need of the evolving discipline of International Relations. Even more than
these two points, neo-liberalism originated to revive the dead approach of liberalism.
It was 1960s which is seen as the decade when neo-liberalism took birth. Its origin was
catalyzed by the declining oomph of realism.
Since after the collapse of liberalism as first hand approach of international relations,
realism was holding firm grip on the world order. Neo-Liberalism defied the system of state
centrism and intense competition bringing forth cooperation as the best option in economic
and political terms.
Various Aspects of Neo - Liberalism
Neo-Liberalism can be understood in various aspects it brought. These are explained below;
A. Neo Liberal Internationalism
The core assumption of this aspect of neo-liberalism is that the liberal democratic states of
the world don't war against each other. This ensures peace and prosperity at global level.
B. Neo-Liberal Institutionalism
This strand of neo-liberal institutionalism though believes in cooperation but in one aspect it
shares commonality with the Realism. It concurs to the point of realism that states are the
principal actors and institutions in the international relations.
But instead of seeing this thing in terms of competition in anarchic world, neo-liberal
institutionalism focuses on ensuring prospects of cooperation.
Neo-Liberalism and Idealism
Neo-Liberalism gives a different scheme to regulate the international affairs as compared to
idealism. The theory of idealism that took birth after the First World War was taken as
utopian way to deal with international relations. It was impracticable.
Neo-Liberalism does not represent utopian and impracticable schemes. It accepts the
primary role of states in world affairs but suggests them to work with cooperation.
Criticism on Neo-Liberalism

Realists attack neo-liberalism again with the traditional mantra of not being a realistic
approach in understanding the global affairs. For the proponents of Feminism this is again
among the theories that carry nothing remarkable to ensure women empowerment.
Marxists consider it as a tool of the Western powers being exploited to deal both the
developing and the developed states under the same but unfair mechanisms.

World System Theory

World System Theory, unlike the classic theories of Realism and Liberalism, is one
dimensional approach to study the situation of dependency of a part of the world upon the
other. The central point of the theory emphasizes on the point that the unhealthy economic
condition of the developing countries is due to continuous dependence on and unending
exploitation by the developed states of the world.
Origin of World System Theory
World System Theory is believed to have its root in the works of Lenin - the revolutionary
founder of the communist USSR. Lenin wrote 'Imperialism - The Highest Stage of
Capitalism'. In this book he blamed capitalistic developed states responsible for exploitation
and backwardness of the developing states.
Explanation of World System Theory
World system theory explains the imperialistic styles of the world hegemons. It simply
divides the world into two tiers. One of the 'Core' which is based on economically and
politically advance countries i.e. European nations, USA. The other is 'Periphery' which
consists of the developing countries of Asia, Africa and South America.
The theory propounds that the Periphery world is dependent upon the Core world. This
dependence can be interpreted in terms of economy, politics and technological
advancement. The reasons behind the dependence are not only backwardness and depravity
of the Periphery but also continuous exploitation of these states by the Core states. This
exploitation is carried out by various tools that can be laws, institutions or any other form.
Historical Dependence of the Periphery
The theory goes deep in the history of the world order. It states that it was Periphery that
provided the Core with cheap labor, natural resources and raw material. Most of the
Periphery states were colonized and exploited to bring advancement and development in the
Core states. This led to historical dependence of the Periphery states on the Core states.
The situation worsened when the Core states reached high levels of industrialization and
technology but they did not share this advancement with the periphery states.
Conclusion
The approach of World System is criticized for being not a theory in real sense. It is single
dimensional perspective that explains how developing states are dependent upon the
developed states. The theory did not carry enough weightage in the theoretical realm of
International Relations.
Feminist Theory
Feminism is a non-traditional and modern theory of International Relations. The theory
highlighted the aspects of international relations from the point of view of women of the

world. The theory propounds how this gender has been sidelined in deciding international
relations despite being its direct victim every time. Feminism is the broadest example of an
effort for women empowerment.
Origin of Feminism as Theory of International Relations
Origin of Feminism is actually the consequence of several world conferences convened to
empower women across the globe. Some of the prominent conferences that played role in
this regard are;
Mexico Women's Conference 1975
Copenhagen Women's Conference 1980
Nairobi Women's Conference 1985
Convention on Elimination of All Kinds of Discriminations against Women 1979
These conferences highlighted the rights of women along with the need to empower them
and give them a share in deciding international affairs.
International Endorsement of Women's Rights
Following the conferences mentioned above, international community endorsed the rightful
demands of women. The United Nations declared the years from 1976 to 1985 as 'Decade
for Women'. Similarly, the year 1975 was marked as the 'International Women's Year'.
Core Points of Feminism as a Theory
Feminism laid down following reservations upon the contemporary world order;
World order is in fact male dominated.
National interest is always multi-dimensional but is defined by masculinity.
Women have always remained hidden in international relations.
Women are direct victims of male dominated decision making in international relations.
War is decided by men but women suffer.
Efficacy of Feminism
Feminism is right in its reservations but it is utopian scheme. It is not practicable to secure
the share for women in international relations in a way as demanded. Feminism just like
World System Theory explains one dimensional aspect of international relations. Though
there is a vast change observable today in the status of women in world. They have been
empowered greatly. But there are cultural, social and historical barriers to enhance their role
in international relations that are difficult to overcome.
Another point which proves that women are now more active in international relations more
than they were in the past is that they can be seen as heads of the states, chief diplomats,
ambassadors, head of delegations at UN.
Conclusion
Feminist theory is more a reservation than an explanation how international relations are
regulated. It rarely gives any clear cut mechanism to regulate international relations. It has
however helped in empowering women.
Power & Elements of National Power
National Power is fundamentally a mantra given by and believed in by the Realist school of
thought in International Relations. Having assumed this world as anarchic, the realists
emphasize upon accumulation of power by a state as inevitable. As far as the parameters of
measuring the national power is concerned, realists do measure it in relative terms. The
criterion set to determine national power is a collection of different elements that

collectively assess it.

What is Power?
In simplest terms of understanding, power is the capacity to get a thing done from someone
who would not have done this otherwise.
What is National Power?
National power refers to the capacity of a state to use its influence, force or authority upon
another state.
Realists' View of National Power
Realist school of thought view national power as ultimate as well as the immediate goal of a
state. According to them a state must never give up accumulating national power after all it
is in competition with friends as well as foes.
Elements of National Power
Elements of national power are the factor which determine the power of a state. Status of
these elements is basically the parameter that may enhance or decline the national power of
a state. Some of the major elements have been elaborated below;
A. Geography
Geography does not only include the size and location of a state which determine national
power but also strategic position, climate, topography etc. Role of geography can be seen in
terms that the USSR and the USA had been super powers of the world and both carried vast
territories. But that is not always the case. Britain has small territory of its own but its
control on seas empowered it to rule over the world.
B. Economy
In the contemporary world order, the thing which matters the most is the powerful and
stable economy of a state. China is a clear example which due to its economy emerges out
to be the next world super power. Even the USA which is super power now has a vibrant
economy.
C. Military
With economy, military might be also essential to enhance national power. China might be
an economic giant but it has limited military capacity as compared to the US. Thus the USA
surpasses it in national power.
D. Technology
Technological advancement emerges out to be another modern element of national power.
Technology is something that is shared in every field whether it is military, science,
agriculture or another department of state. A state technologically advance shares
superiority over the other. For instance, during the Cold War, the USA shared technological
superiority over the USSR.
E. Natural Resources
Natural resources are another element of national power. What matters in real is not the
presence of natural resources but it is their exploitation. If exploited to the maximum
benefit, natural resources can be helpful in enhancing national power.
F. National Unity and Population
Population type and its skills determine national power. And if the population of a nation is
united, it empowers the nation better.
G. Ideology
Ideology is traditional element of national power. It matters less but still matters to
determine national power. This is because of the reason that ideology plays role in

determining structure of state.

National Interest
National interest is a tricky topic of modern International Relations. It is something taken as
an impetus behind every state action relative to another state. National Interest serves as
the determinant of state's foreign policy along with depicting the nature and policies of
political government ruling the state.
Defining National Interest
It is a common perception that national interest has no concrete and definite words that can
define it absolutely. It is a fluid aspect of International Relations. The definition of national
interest lacks universality because the national interest is not shared common by all states.
Secondly, there are the factors which determine national interest of a state for a specific
period of time. These factors also vary from state to state.
But in a very safe and simplest attempt to define national interest following words can be
used; "National Interest is the name of those goals and objectives of a state which are
pursued to seek the maximum benefit in a given set of circumstances".
Fluidity of National Interest
National interest lacks definite outlook. The variables which prevent national interest from
seeking a concrete shape are following;
Varying circumstances
Different state ideologies
Major changes in the World Order
These variables make states to review their national interests from time to time and alter
their course of action then.
Link Between National Interest and Foreign Policy
National interest is closely linked to the foreign policy of a state. As foreign policy is
determined and drafted keeping in view the national interest. Relations of one state with
another state are nothing more than their interests attached to each other's. In Foreign
policy a state pursues its national interest.
Determinants of National Interest
Along with the variables mentioned above, national interest is determined by following
elements;
State's geo - strategic position
Political traditions
Goals and manifestoes of political parties
History of the state
Survival - The Chief Aim of National Interest
Among the several aims and goals of the national interest of a state, survival stands to be
the first one. All other interests come after a state has ensured survival. Other aims of
national interest can be economic, political and diplomatic oriented.
Ways to Pursue National Interest
National interest is pursued through different ways. In the modern world of the nation state system, national interest is pursued chiefly by 'Diplomacy'. It is the legitimate art of
forwarding state's foreign policy towards other states. In this way actually national interest
is pursued.

Ways to pursue other than diplomacy can be use of influence, making alliances, concluding
agreements and treaties. Illegitimate ways might include the use of force against the other
state or interfering in its internal matters with the help of non - state actors.
Conclusion
National interest is understood in wider sense. It is mostly long term policy. The reason
behind the presence of complexity in understanding national interest is also that we take it
in shorter term as something imminently achievable and based on unchangeable principles.
But in fact it is contrary to that.

Sovereignty
Sovereignty is a modern day aspect of the International Relations. It is actually linked with
the aboriginal concept of the nation - state system. Before the origin of the nation state
system, the idea of sovereignty was vague. Later it evolved gradually to assume the
contemporary manifestation.
Defining Sovereignty
Sovereignty is defined in terms of 'unrestricted and unlimited authority of a state within its
territory and on its population'. In another meaning of sovereignty, it is taken as the
supremacy of state. This supremacy is meant to control and command everything inferior to
it.
Sovereignty as Element of State
Modern nation state has four essential elements as defined in the 'Montevideo Convention
on Duties and Rights of States';
Population
Territory
Government
Sovereignty
Sovereignty as an element of state is the most important one in abstract sense. Without
sovereignty the idea of population and territory can be perceived but the idea of
government control on both these things remains impossible. So, sovereignty is actually the
name of that control as well which government being the working agency of state exercise
over its people.
Various Dimensions of Sovereignty
Sovereignty is understood in different dimensions or types. Some are explained below;
A. Domestic Sovereignty
Domestic sovereignty means that the state is sovereign to rule over and decide for all the
internal matters within its territory or related to its population.
B. Interdependence Sovereignty
Interdependence sovereignty means that state shall have control the international
boundaries it shares with the neighboring states. No one is permitted to cross the borders of
the state without due permission.
C. International Legal Sovereignty
This sovereignty is linked to the recognition of other sovereign states which have fulfilled the
criteria of being the nation states.
Exclusivity and Absoluteness in Sovereignty

Exclusiveness and Absoluteness are two important features of sovereignty. Exclusivity

means that the state is sovereign excluding all other agents that may tend to exercise
control. In simple terms it excludes these agents from sharing state's sovereignty.
Absoluteness of sovereignty of state means that the supremacy and authority of state is
absolute and final. It will govern not only all the geographical parts of the country but also
decide for the people. This feature makes the modern nation state as central institute of
power.
Internal & External Sovereignty
Internal sovereignty deals with the internal affairs of a state. This idea is most of the time
also linked with the concept of legitimacy of government. The way in which a government is
elected to exercise internal sovereignty is an important aspect.
External sovereignty is the name of maintaining relations of a sovereign power with the
other states of the world. It is not the supremacy of one state over another but the way in
which relations between states are to be maintained on equal footing.
Conclusion
Sovereignty is an abstract element of state which is also the most important one.
Sovereignty is the actual thing which works as the soul of modern nation state.
Balance of Power
Balance of power is the classical realist concept that preserved peace of the pre - world wars
world. It is concept that marks its practical implementation in 18th century. In the
contemporary world, balance of power theory has little role to play but it cannot be ignored
utterly due to its historic role. Even during the Cold War, a balance of power was present
between the two Super Powers which prevented from escalation of any conflict to the total
war.
Defining Balance of Power
It has been noted that unlike most of the topics of international relations which lack
concrete definitions, 'Balance of Power' is actually the one which has multiple
interpretations. In simple terms, Balance of Power refers to 'the mechanism which the
states adopt in order to maintain a certain level of equilibrium in their relative powers'.
Balance of Power as a General Social Principle
International Relations' Realist Morgenthau see the 'Balance of Power' as a general social
principle. According to this perspective, 'Balance of Power' exists among states just as it
exists among individuals in society to maintain the social peace and equilibrium.
Pre - Requisites of 'Balance of Power'
Balance of power requires following essentials;
Multiple nation states
International anarchy
Varying degrees of powers distributed among the states
Requirement for bringing an equilibrium
Tools of 'Balance of Power'
Balance of power is not naturally present in the world order. It has to be achieved by the
world states utilizing one or the other method. Some major tools or techniques of achieving
balance of power are elaborated as following;
A. Alliances & Counter Alliances

This is the chief way to maintain or bring balance of power. In the 18th century world and
also during the Cold War, balance of power was kept by establishing Alliances. A common
example is 'NATO' & 'Warsaw' during the Cold War. Both the alliances, each led by rival
superpower, maintained a level of balance between them.
B. Buffer States
These are the states which geographically work as barrier between two or more rivals. For
instance, Afghanistan has been a buffer state between British held Indian colony and the
Soviet Union. Similarly, Tibet served as buffer states between India and China.
C. Armament and Militarization
Armament and militarization by one nation leads the rival states to do the same. This
maintains balance of power between them. India and Pakistan present this type of case.
Both the states maintain a level of deterrence through militarization and nuclear armament.
D. Disarmament
During Cold War, particularly in its later part, rapid disarmament agreements were
concluded between the US and the USSR. These agreements were like SALT, NPT at global
level, etc. These helped to restore balance of power by reducing dreadful arms.
E. Intervention
Intervention is also an option to bring balance of power. The US & USSR' interventions in
Korean war, Vietnam war are its examples. Both the powers maintained balance of power
between them by fighting proxy wars at foreign lands.
Conceptualization of Security in 21st Century
Balance of Power is anachronism in the 21st century which is dominated by the nation
states that see their national interests and national powers as chief aims. Thus, intense
competition exists in anarchic world. Balance of power was not appropriate to bring peace to
the 21st century world. Due to its inadequacy and uncertainty it was needed to be replaced
by something more reliable.
Perceiving the Idea of Security in 21st Century
21st century is witnessing the nation states in their evolved shapes. International
community is stronger than ever before in the chaotic world history. But the risks of conflicts
among states are never eliminated absolutely. It is part of realistic world. In 21st century
these risks might be less but dangerous than ever. This is because international community
is strong but several states have weaponized themselves with weapons of mass destruction.
Thus, maintaining peace in this scenario is critical and needs proper mechanisms.
'Collective Security' as Core Concept of World Peace in 21st Century
The idea of 'Collective Security' replaced 'Balance of Power' in 21st century. This core
concept of security is different from its preceding formula.
A. What is Collective Security?
Collective Security can be defined as the 'the collective or joint mechanisms adopted and
pursued by the international community to fight aggression and the aggressor in order to
maintain international peace'.
B. Principle behind the Concept of Collective Security
The principle behind the concept of Collective Security is that 'all the states must be joining
hands to fight against the aggression. Attack against one states shall be taken as an attack
against all states'.
C. How to Achieve Collective Security?
Collective security can be achieved by pursuing the ways mentioned below;

 Aggressor state is needed to be identified in a combat

All other states shall work jointly to contain or defeat the aggressor
Aggressor shall be either made to surrender or defeated
Arrangements shall be made in future to bring the aggressor state into mainstream
Effectiveness of Collective Security
Effectiveness of 'Collective Security' depends completely upon the eagerness of states to
play their respective roles in this regard. More the willing states would be the more effective
Collective Security can be perceived.
Collective Security & The League of Nations
League of Nations established on the principle of collective security failed in its mission due
to inappropriate and nationalistic approach of certain states like Germany, Italy, France. It
carried the principles to preserve the world peace which collapsed after the Great
Depression and finally led world to Second Great War of the century.

Collective Security & the UN

UN succeeded the League. In its very first Article, the UN Charter pledges to maintain
international peace. Chapter 7 of the charter further clarifies the course of action that states
need to adopt in cases of Breach of Peace.
Conclusion
Collective Security is the idea that works as the concept of security in 21stcentury. This
concept is working contemporarily along with several flaws it carries.

UN Climate Change Conference Paris, 2015

Non-Traditional Challenge
The international community is facing a non-traditional challenge which is 'Climate Change'

caused by some factors under the umbrella of 'Global Warming'.

A New Subject on the International Priority List
Civil wars, terrorism, inter-state wars, and peacemaking have always been the
overwhelming issues of International Laws and Conventions. But since the later years of
20th century, the apparent effects of climate change have if not changed then at least
added a new concern for their priorities.
Conference at Paris
UN Climate Change Conference was held at the beginning of December previous year.
Delegations from all the 196 member states of the UN attended the meeting and resultantly
drew 'Paris Agreement.'
The agreement once signed and ratified by at least 55 states, will regulate several
environmental concerns including the emission of greenhouse gasses to which China, USA,
and India are notoriously contributing.
Intended Nationally Determined Contributions
Before the meeting, each of the participants drafted and submitted 'Intended Nationally
Determined Contributions' to clarify their positions and roles over the climate change.
Position of Pakistan
Pakistan also submitted the said document and participated in the conference. The country
has more concerns over climate change particularly after the periodical floods in the recent
years. But the bitter reality is that it possesses the little capability to do anything to evade
this problem.
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
This conference was 21st annual meeting over the UN initiative for climate change. The 1st
one took place in 1992 when 'UN Framework Convention on Climate Change' was signed.
Criticism
Both the agreements pledge for nearly similar aims but rarely have any mechanism for
enforcing the climate policy rules. Secondly, the conference and its agreements are also
criticized for the non-seriousness behavior of major countries who see no political benefit in
it.
In compact, climate change will prove to be a friend of none; it is a problem to be solved
with mutual efforts even if they are slow.

Syrian Civil War

Beginning
A series of demonstrations conducted in the wake of Arab Spring of 2011 against the Syrian
President Bashar Al-Asad gradually turned into violent armed confrontations between the
Syrian Government and the Opposition Groups.
Multidimensional Conflicts
The fight was political and sectarian which became more complicated with the rise of selfstyled terrorist outfit 'ISIL' and the plunge of International Powers into Syria to combat it
along with securing their peculiar regional interests.
Russian Intervention

In the chain of events, the latest significant intervention was made by Russia in September
of the previous year when the Syrian government requested the former for airstrikes
against the rebels and terrorists. Russian move is backed by Iran and Iraq as well. Syria has
been an important ally of Russia in the Middle East and it doesn't want to compromise its
strategic value. Russian presence is, however, troublesome for both the US and its Middle
Eastern allies.
Violation of Human Rights
Breaches of human rights is another shameful chapter of Syrian strife. Children and noncombatant citizens have been severally made a victim of air strikes.
Refuges tragedy
An estimated 9 million Syrians are displaced, taking refuge in neighbouring countries or
displaced within Syria itself. As per the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) estimation, over 3 million have fled to Syria's immediate neighbours Turkey
(22,00,000), Lebanon (11,96,560), Jordan (1,400,000), KSA (420,000), and Iraq
(247,861). The majority of the Syrian which is about 6.5 million are internally displaced
within Syria. Meanwhile, under 150,000 Syrians have declared asylum in the European
Union, while member states have assured to resettle a further 33,000 Syrians. The vast
majority of these resettlement spots - 28,500 or 85% - are announced by Germany.
Peace Talks at Geneva
Currently, global powers including US, UK, Germany, Russia and regional powers like Iran,
Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are mutually engaged in talks at Geneva to sort out the
acceptable ways of bringing peace to Syria and crush ISIL.

Rising China
Effective yet Peaceful Rise
Keeping itself abreast with the commandments of Mao Zedong and the necessities of the
transforming world, China is rising effectively yet peacefully.
Unipolar World
End of Cold War cemented a unipolar world with the USA as its sole hegemon who had
technological, economic and military powers not better than anyone else but everyone else.
Being the superpower of the world, the USA practiced influence in Europe, Middle East and
to some extent South East Asia.
Superpower in-Waiting
In the wake of rapid economic development and enhanced trade, the realists of international
arena began to call China as the 'superpower-in-waiting'. But this was not the belief shared
by all of them.
Former American Secretary of the State 'Henry Kissinger' calls the Chinese rise as nothing
more than a 'psychological impact'.
US-China Comparison
Militarily China has the world's largest number of soldiers but this in no way surpasses the
US military might. The tactics, weapons and aircraft technology and the experience of
unilaterally directing the world order make US superior even now. Regarding the economy,

US still has the GDP of over 17 trillion as compared to the Chinese GDP of 11 trillion
according to the statics taken a previous year.
Transforming World and Chinese
The world is facing a change in alliances and interests. China though not overtake the USA
very soon but it's not far away as well. According to various predictions, China will be the
superpower within next 50 years or even a bit longer. The country has begun to show its
presence in South China Sea, South Asia and Africa either through trade or other hegemonic
designs.
Afghan War
9/11 & Invasion of Afghanistan
Following the September 11 Al-Qaeda led attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, the then
American President G. W. Bush launched the 'Operation Enduring Freedom' along with its
allies to root out the said militant organization which was then being hosted by 'Taliban
Government' in Afghanistan.
Allies of Afghan War on Terror
Primarily the militarily powerful member states of NATO and then UN Security Council
sanctioned 'International Security Assistance Force' led all the war operations in
Afghanistan. The 'Northern Alliance' of Tajiks of Afghanistan backed the US operations. A
new government was also installed.

Consequences of the Invasion

The invasion of Afghanistan was the easiest part and so was dismantling the Taliban
Government but not its aftermaths.
A guerrilla warfare began which claimed the lives of thousands of foreign soldiers, Taliban
combatants, and Afghan civilians. The war led to massive migration of Afghan nationals into
neighboring countries.
With all the ups and downs of the Afghan situation, the war continued until December 2014
when NATO announced official end of all combats. But this was in no way the end of Afghan
crisis nor were all the foreign troops to leave the invaded land.
Withdrawal of American Troops from Afghanistan
The complete withdrawal was expected in 2015 but keeping in view the current Taliban
attacks in Afghanistan, Obama Administration has announced to retain nearly 10,000
American soldiers there for an indefinite period.
Quadrilateral Peace Talks
Currently, a Quadrilateral effort, by Pakistan, China, Afghanistan, and the US, to initiate
dialogue between the combatants and the Afghan Government is being made after the
Pakistan-brokered talks broke last year.
Revival of Putin's Russia
Putin's Dissatisfaction with the Legacy of his Predecessors
Not conceding to the legacy of Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, Russian President 'Vladimir
Putin' has been ruling the country since 1999 from one office or the other; with the implicit
ambition to open that phase of history when the Great Soviet Union was disintegrated.
Manifestations of Russian Revival in International Political Arena
The latest manifestation of Putin's this rhetoric is explicit when he readily accepted the
invitation of Al-Assad government in 2015 to launch the airstrikes apparently against the

ISIL but secretly to curb the rebels and support its Syrian ally. This drastic action of Russia
was followed by another incident in 2014 which could be seen as the focal point of changing
world order. The incident shook the world when Russia annexed Crimea - a part of Ukraine.
Sanctions on Russia curbing its Ambitions
Hit by the severe sanctions soon after Crimean chapter, Putin pledged to uphold Russian
vigor by commanding the people 'to produce and eat their own' with a clear challenge to the
West as in words of Fidel Castro; "We don't want them (West), we don't need them."
Russian Economy
The economy is the lifeline of a rising state. Putin's years of rule from 2000 to 2008 as
President marked distinct economic growth. Along with several other reasons, this was
because of high oil prices amid the massive production of crude oil by Russia. Since after he
assumed office in 2012, the growth record has not been narrating the same success story.
Ranking among the top five economies of the world, Russia now stands not even in the first
ten according to its Nominal GDP Rank. It is the aspect which reflects that Russia might be
losing oomph.
Alliances Maintained by Russia
But economy alone never determines state's power. Other factors, mostly political ones also
account for in this regard. One of these important factors is 'alliance'. Russia and China have
never been on the same ideological page despite the fact that both are communist states. It
is because of their self-defined postulates of communism. However, at the forum of
Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), they are one when it comes to challenging the
hegemony of the US. Secondly, the alliance of Russia with oil-rich Iran in the Middle East is
changing the game in the Middle East particularly after when Iran has made re-entry into
the world market after the end of sanctions.
Unsafe Prediction
In a compact analysis, it cannot be safely predicted that Russia will seek its lost glory, but it
will also not be wise to close eyes to the awakening of 'Russian Bear' from the dormancy
which began with the collapse of Soviet Union. The evolving world order will be affected by
it.