Está en la página 1de 54

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - REGION III


DMGC, Maimpis, City of San Fernando, (P)

Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) - Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
FY 2016
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - REGION III
Name of Employee:
MALCOLM S. GARMA
Position:
OIC-REGIONAL DIRECTOR

Name of Rater:
Position:

Review Period:

Date of Review:

January-December 2016

UNDERSECRETARY FOR GOVERNANCE AND OPER

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd Region III


TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFO'S

KRAs
CURRICULUM

Basic Education Governance

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Shall have

TO BE FILLED
Weight per
KRA
30%

1. increased the level of relevance of the curriculum from Kindergarten


to Junior High School by producing/designing one (1) instructional
material/lesson exemplar through indigenization, innovation and
integration at the end of the Fiscal Year.

January to December 2016

10%

2.attained 80% compliance on the implementation of Senior High


School Program in public and private schools in 20 Schools Divisions
Offices by regularly monitoring and evaluating the implementation of
the program within the fiscal year.

June to December 2016

10%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


Quality

Efficiency

Timeline

ACTUAL RESULTS

School Program in public and private schools in 20 Schools Divisions


Offices by regularly monitoring and evaluating the implementation of
the program within the fiscal year.

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

3.attained 80% compliance on the implementation of Special Programs January to December 2016
of the 20 Schools Divisions Offices by conducting a regular monitoring
and evaluation on the implementation of the programs within the fiscal
year.

SERVICE DELIVERY

Weight per
KRA

10%

50%
1. achieved 100% utilization of the school resources (classrooms,
equipment and furniture) of the 20 Schools Division Offices by ensuring
equitable distribution of resources among the 20 Schools Division January to December 2016
Offices and at the end of fiscal year.

4%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

2. achieved 100% compliance on the implementation of the different January to December 2016
programs (sports and scouting) of the 20 Schools Division Offices by
monitoring and providing technical assistance on the implementation of
the programs at the end of the fiscal year.

4%

3. attained 100% completion of the learners' profile of the 20 Schools


Division Offices by updating the End of the School Year (EOSY) and
Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in the EBEIS.

EOSY: April 30, 2016 BOSY:


September 30, 2016

4%

4. improved the relevance of the implementation of policies by


releasing four (4) localized policies to twenty (20) Schools Division
January to December 2016
Offices at the end of the fiscal year.

4%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

5. strengthened the research capabilities of the 20 Schools Division


Offices through the conduct of:
5a. one regional
level conference workshop
July 30, 2016
5b. one regional research evaluation
5c.
30-Nov-16
one regional research congress
20-Dec-16

6. increased the level of budget utilization from 89% to 98% through


real time on-line monitoring, coordinating with program takers and
controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the fiscal year.

4%
January to December 2016

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

7. attained a 100% compliance on the submission of the budget


execution reports through systematic recording and reporting of the
agency financial and physical operations during the first month of the
end of each quarter.

TIMELINE

Q1: April 30, 2016

Weight per
KRA

4%

Q2: July 30, 2016


Q3: October 30, 2016
Q4: January 30, 2016

8. attained 100% releases of salaries, allowances and other benefits January to December 2016
of the personnel of the RO proper and 20 Schools Division Offices
through accurate preparation, processing and submission of Report of
Disbursement with supporting documents within the presecribed
period.

4%

9. achieved 100% remittances of salary deductions, government January to December 2016


shares, government financing institutions and private lending
institutions and private lending institutions through accurate
preparation and processing of statement of remittance for government
share and salary deductions on the 10th day of the succeeding month.

4%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

9. achieved 100% remittances of salary deductions, government


shares, government financing institutions and private lending
institutions and private lending institutions through accurate
preparation and processing of statement of remittance for government
share and salary deductions on the 10th day of the succeeding month.
OBJECTIVES

10. improved the level of clienteles' satisfaction on the frontline


services from 90% to 100% and from very satisfatory to excellent as
reflected in the Citizen's Charter by setting standards on processing of
documents at the end of the fiscal year

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

4%
January to December 2016

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

January to December 2016

3%

12. enhanced the level of competence of the RO3 personnel and 20


Schools Division Offices personnel through the implementation of
January to December 2016
100% of the approved/requested need-based trainings at the end of
the fiscal year.

3%

OBJECTIVES
11. improved the level of implementation of ICT related plans and
programs of the Regional Office from 10% to 85% by managing
efficiently the ICT systems and infrastructure to support operations
within the fiscal year.

13. attained 100% compliance of the provisions for requested technical


assistance recommended/ technical assistance resulting from M&E to
Regional Office and 20 Schools Division Offices by providing relevant,
timely and appropriate technical assistance within the fiscal year.

January to December 2016

4%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

13. attained 100% compliance of the provisions for requested technical


assistance recommended/ technical assistance resulting from M&E to
Regional Office and 20 Schools Division Offices by providing relevant,
timely and appropriate technical assistance within the fiscal year.
OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

PRIVATE SCHOOLS

Weight per
KRA

20%

1. attained 100% compliance in the operation of the 1,512 private


schools (Kindergarten, Elementary and Junior High School) by
granting Government authority to operate and Government
Recognition for accreditation and regulation of schedule of fees and
other school operation as per D.O. 85, s. 2010 at the end of Fiscal
Year..

2. attained 100% compliance on the provisions of distributing GASTPE


grants both to junior and senior high schools by providing technical
assistance on school operations for FAPE accreditation at the end of
Fiscal Year.

January to December
2016

January to December 2016

10%

5%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

Weight per
KRA

TIMELINE

3. attained 100% compliance in the operation of 730 private Senior


High Schools by granting Provisional Permit to operate Grade 11 and
January to December 2016
Grade 12 and by conducting QA-M&E for the proper implementation of
the Senior High School programs and projects at the end of the Fiscal
Year

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

5%

100%

TOTAL

Overall Rating for Accomplishment

Rater:

Ratee:

MALCOLM S. GARMA,
Director III, Officer-In
Office of the Regional

Undersecretary for Governance and Operations

Approving Authority:

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

DepEd Secretary
pprd01/pprd05

ACTUAL RESULTS

Republic of the Philippines


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - REGION III
DMGC, Maimpis, City of San Fernando, (P)

ent System (RPMS) - Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
FY 2016

UNDERSECRETARY FOR GOVERNANCE AND OPERATIONS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

Average Rating

MALCOLM S. GARMA, CESO V


Director III, Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Regional Director
Approving Authority:

SCORE

ACTUAL RESULTS

DepEd Secretary

Average Rating

SCORE

Department of Education
Region III
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
City of San Fernando (P)

Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) - Office Performance Commitment and Review Form
CY 2016-2017
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:

REMEDIOS D. DE GUZMAN, Ph.D.


PRINCIPAL IV

Name of Rater: ROWENA T. QUIAMBAO, CESE


Position: OIC-ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
Date of Review:

June 2016 - March 2017

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd-Justino Sevilla High School


TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFO'S

KRAs

BASIC EDUCATION
GOVERNANCE

INSTRUCTIONAL
LEADERSHIP

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Shall have
1. Improved teachers instructional competence by
conducting classroom observations and instructed
the Master Teachers and Head Teachers to conduct
at least 10 classroom observation every month

Weight per
KRA
20%

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi

Quality
5 - Ten (10) teachers were observed

4 - Nine (9) teachers were observed

3 - Eight (8) teachers were observed

2 - Seven (7) teachers were observed

1 - Six (6) teachers were observed

2. Increased the level of relevance of the curriculum


in the Junior and Senior High Schools by facilitating
the implementation of eight (8) instructional
materials/lesson exemplars through indigenization,
innovation and integration at the end of the year

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

5 - 100% completion of the instructional


materials/lesson exemplar

4 - 95-99% completion of the instructional


materials/lesson exemplar

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


3 - 90-94% completion of the instructional
materials/lesson exemplar

2 - 85-89% completion of the instructional


materials/lesson exemplar

1 - 80-84% completion of the instructional


materials/lesson exemplar

3. Attained 80% compliance on the implementation


of the senior high school program

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

5 - 100% Senior High School program was


complied
4 - 95-99% Senior High School program was
complied

3 - 90-94% Senior High School program was


complied

2 - 85-89% Senior High School program was


complied

1 - 80-84% Senior High School program was


complied

4. Accounted for learning outcomes of the vis--vis


Division Targets by increasing the MPS (75%) of the
following subjects:
Filipino
English
Mathematics
Science

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

5 - MPS of the four (4) learning areas met


the Division targets

MFO'S

KRAs

4. Accounted for learning outcomes of the vis--vis


Division Targets by increasing the MPS (75%) of the
following subjects:
OBJECTIVES
Filipino
English
Mathematics
Science

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


4 - MPS of three (3) learning areas met the
Division targets

3 - MPS of two (2) learning areas met the


Division targets

2 - MPS of one (1) learning area/s met the


Division targets

1 - MPS of four (4) learning areas did not


meet the Division targets

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

15%
1. Provided safe, conducive, and motivating
learning environment to students by implementing
100% of the activities enumerated in the following
plans:
School-based Child Protection Plan
GAD Plan
School DRRM Plan

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

5 - Implementation of 100% of activities


enumerated in the school plans for learning
environment (SCPP, GAD, SDRRM)

4 - Implementation of 95-99% activities


enumerated in the school plans for learning
environment (SCPP, GAD, SDRRM)

3 - Implementation of 90-94% activities


enumerated in the school plans for learning
environment (SCPP, GAD, SDRRM)

2 - Implementation of 85-89% activities


enumerated in the school plans for learning
environment (SCPP, GAD, SDRRM)

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


1 - Implementation of 80-84% activities
enumerated in the school plans for learning
environment (SCPP, GAD, SDRRM)

2. Attained a child-friendly environment by attaining


35 points in the Child Friendly System assessment

June 2016 - March 2017

5%

5 - Scored 35 points or higher in the CFSS


survey (very outstanding Child-Friendly
school)

4 - Scored 30-34 points in the CFSS survey


(outstanding Child-Friendly school)

3 - Scored 25-29 points in the CFSS survey


(Child-Friendly school)

2 - Scored 20-24 points in the CFSS survey


(Striving to be a Child-Friendly school)

1 - Scored below 20 points in the CFSS


survey (not a Child-Friendly school)

3. Ensured a safe school environment by


evaluating/Inspecting the school plant, physical
facilities fitness, safety and sufficiency with the
assistance of specialists annually

June 2016 - March 2017

5%
5 100% compliance

4 95-99% compliance

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi

3 90-94% compliance

2 85-89% compliance

1 80-84% compliance

30%

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS

1. Led in the preparation of the Enhanced School


Improvement Plan and Annual Improvement Plan
by mobilizing the SPT and submitting the Plans for
validation and approval

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - validated and approved ESIP and 100%


implementation of the AIP

4 - validated and approved ESIP and 95%99% implementation of the AIP

3 - validated and approved ESIP and 90%94% implementation of the AIP

2 - validated and approved ESIP and 85%89% implementation of the AIP

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


1 - validated and approved ESIP and 80%84% implementation of the AIP

2. Achieved 100% utilization of school resources


(classrooms, equipment and furniture) of the by
ensuring proper utilization at the end of school year

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - 100% distribution and utilization of school


resources

4- 95-99% distribution and utilization of


school resources

3 - 90-94% distribution and utilization of


school resources

2 - 85-89% distribution and utilization of


school resources

1 - 80-84% distribution and utilization of


school resources

3. Attained 100% completion of the learners' profile


by updating of the End of School Year (EOSY) and
Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in the EBEIS

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - 100% completed learners' profile by


updating the End of the School Year (EOSY)
and Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in
the EBEIS.

4 - 90% completed learners' profile by


updating the End of the School Year (EOSY)
and Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in
the EBEIS.

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


3 - 80% completed learners' profile by
updating the End of the School Year (EOSY)
and Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in
the EBEIS.

2 - 70% completed learners' profile by


updating the End of the School Year (EOSY)
and Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in
the EBEIS.

1 - 60% completed learners' profile by


updating the End of the School Year (EOSY)
and Beginning of the School Year (BOSY) in
the EBEIS.

4. Attained 80% compliance on the implementation


of the following programs within the school year:
SSC, Journalism, Gulayan sa Paaralan, Teen
Health Workers, Income-Generating Project (IGP),
Culminating Activity per quarter

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 -80% programs were complied

4 -75 - 79% programs were complied

3 -70 -74% programs were complied

2 - 65 -69% programs were complied

1 - 60-64% programs were complied

5. Achieved 100% compliance on the


implementation of the different programs (sports
and scouting) by implementing ATAS (A Troop A
School) and participating in sports activities.

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - 100% participation in the listed Deped


programs
4 - 95-99% participation in the listed Deped
programs
3 - 90-94% participation in the listed Deped
programs

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


2 - 85-89% participation in the listed Deped
programs
1 - 80-84% participation in the listed Deped
programs

6. Attained 100% compliance on the submission of


the financial reports (MOOE and PS)

June 2016 - March 2017

2%

5 -100% of the pertinent documents for


MOOE were compiled

4-95-99% of the pertinent documents for


MOOE were compiled

3 -90-94% of the pertinent documents for


MOOE were compiled

2 -85 - 89% of the pertinent documents for


MOOE were compiled

1 -80-84% of the pertinent documents for


MOOE were compiled

7. Improved the level of clientele's satisfaction on


the frontline services from 90% to 100% and from
very satisfactory to excellent as reflected in the
Citizen's Charter by setting standards on processing
of documents at the end of the school year

June 2016 - March 2017

2%

5 -100% level of satisfaction

4-95-99% level of satisfaction

3 -90-94% level of satisfaction

2 -85-89% level of satisfaction

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


1 -80-84% level of satisfaction

8. Submitted 100% of the appointments and


deployments, promotions, transfers, reassignments,
reinstatements and dropping from the rolls of
teachers/employees

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 -100% submitted documents

4-95-99% submitted documents

3 -90-94% submitted documents

2 -85-89% submitted documents

1 -80-84% submitted documents

9. Attained 100% implementation of CI Projects for


the school year

3%

5 -100% implementation of CI Projects

4-95-99% implementation of CI Projects

3 -90-94% implementation of CI Projects

2 -85-89% implementation of CI Projects

1 -80-84% implementation of CI Projects

10. Improved the level of implementation of ICT


related plans and programs of the school from 35%
to 50% by managing efficiently the ICT systems and
infrastructure to support operations within the
calendar year.

June 2016 - March 2017

2%

5 - 50% level of implementation

MFO'S

KRAs

10. Improved the level of implementation of ICT


related plans and programs
of the school from 35%
OBJECTIVES
to 50% by managing efficiently the ICT systems and
infrastructure to support operations within the
calendar year.

June 2016 - March 2017


TIMELINE

2%
Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


4 -47-49 level of implementation

3 -44-46% level of implementation

2 -41-43% level of implementation

1 -38-40% level of implementation

11. Led in the implementation of the school health


and nutrition program within the school year

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 -100% implementation

4-95-99% implementation

3 -90-94% implementation

2 -85-89% implementation

1 -80-84% implementation

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi

15%

HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT &
DEVELOPMENT
1. Improved teachers competence and work
attitude by providing technical assistance to 100%
of the teachers within the school year

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 -100% implementation

4-95-99% implementation

3 -90-94% implementation

2 -85-89% implementation

1 -80-84% implementation

2. Enhanced the level of competence of the 136


personnel through the implementation of 100% of
SLACS, INSETs and trainings listed in the School
Plan for Professional Development at the end of the
school year.

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 -100% implementation

4-95-99% implementation

3 -90-94% implementation

2 -85-89% implementation

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


1 -80-84% implementation

3. Guided the teachers in their career path by


facilitating the promotion of the following teachers:
4 Teachers I to Teachers II
4 Teachers I to Teachers III
3 Teachers II to Teacher III
1 Teacher III to Head Teacher II
1 Head Teacher II to Assistant Principal
1 Teacher III to Master Teacher I

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - 14 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted/ reclassified/


undergone ERF

4 - 13 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted/ reclassified/


undergone ERF
3 - 12 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted/ reclassified/
undergone ERF
2 - 11 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted/ reclassified/
undergone ERF
1 - 10 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted/ reclassified/
undergone ERF

4. Improved teachers morale and motivation by


giving rewards and recognition at the end of the 1st
and 2nd semester within the school year

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 -100% implementation

4-95-99% implementation

3 -90-94% implementation

2 -85-89% implementation

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


1 -80-84% implementation

5. Improved and updated competence of Teaching


and Non-Teaching personnel by sending at least 10
of them to cluster, division, regional, and national
trainings based on their training needs

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - Ten (10) teachers were sent to trainings

5 - Nine (9) teachers were sent to trainings

5 - Eight (8) teachers were sent to trainings

5 - Seven (7) teachers were sent to trainings

5 - Six (6) teachers were sent to trainings

10%
PARENTS INVOLVEMENT AND
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
1. Improved parents involvement in school
programs and their childrens performance by
meeting parents once quarterly to confer/inform
about school accomplishments and students
performance

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5- 75% level of parents' involvement

4-70-74% level of parents' involvement

3- 65-69% level of parents' involvement

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


2- 60-64% level of parents' involvement

1- 55-59% level of parents' involvement

2. Increased stakeholders involvement in school


improvement by 75% level of participation by
designing and implementing two (2)
programs/projects with stakeholders to address
school needs

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5- 75% level of participation/involvement of


stakeholders in two (2) programs/projects for
school improvement

4-70-74% level of participation/involvement


of stakeholders in two (2) programs/projects
for school improvement

3- 65-69% level of participation/involvement


of stakeholders in two (2) programs/projects
for school improvement

2- 60-64% level of participation/involvement


of stakeholders in two (2) programs/projects
for school improvement

1- 55-59% level of participation/involvement


of stakeholders in two (2) programs/projects
for school improvement

3. Strengthened stakeholders involvement and


community partnership by recognizing stakeholders
accomplishments and contributions annually

June 2016 - March 2017

4%

5 - 5 meetings were conducted for


assessment of students' needs
4 - 4 meetings were conducted for
assessment of students' needs

accomplishments and contributions annually

MFO'S

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


3 - 3 meetings were conducted for
assessment of students' needs

2 - 2 meetings were conducted for


assessment of students' needs

1 - 1 meeting was conducted for assessment


of students' needs

10%

PLUS FACTOR
1. Construction of Senior High School Canteen

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 - 100% of the Senior High School canteen


was constructed

4 - 90-99% of the Senior High School


canteen was constructed due to Manpower

3 - 80-89% only of the Senior High School


canteen was constructed due to Budget
constraint

2 - 70-79% only of the Senior High School


canteen was not fully constructed due to
irregularities

1 - 60-69% of the Senior High School


canteen was not fully materialized

2. Strengthened the research capabilities of the


Master Teachers by completing 4 action researches
within the school year

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

5 Action research conducted with full


documentation on completion of
interventions

MFO'S

KRAs

2. Strengthened the research capabilities of the


Master Teachers by completing 4 action researches
within the school year
OBJECTIVES

June 2016 - March 2017

3%

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


4 Action research conducted with
documentation on completion of
interventions

3 Action research conducted with few


documentation on completion of
interventions

2 Identified action research problem with


research proposals

1 No evidence of documentation

3. Received/awarded certificate/s and recognition/s


through various competitions within the school year

June 2016 - March 2017

2%

5 - Awarded in the National Level

4 - Awarded in the Regional Level

3 - Awarded in the Division Level

2 - Awarded in the District/Cluster Level

1 - No award/s or recognition/s received

4. Partnered with parents in soliciting assistance


from stakeholders to improve school - learning
atmosphere by organizing fund raising campaign
and solicit assistance from different stakeholders in
order to improve school atmosphere

June 2016 - March 2017

2%

5 - 80% of the fund raising of the school was


assisted by the parents and other
stakeholders

MFO'S

KRAs

4. Partnered with parents in soliciting assistance


from stakeholders to improve school - learning
atmosphere by organizing fund raising campaign
OBJECTIVES
and solicit assistance from different stakeholders in
order to improve school atmosphere

June 2016 - March 2017

2%

TIMELINE

Weight per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Effi


4 - 77-79% of the fund raising of the school
was assisted by the parents and other
stakeholders

3 - 74-76% of the fund raising of the school


was assisted by the parents and other
stakeholders

2 - 71-73% of the fund raising of the school


was assisted by the parents and other
stakeholders

1 - 68-71% of the fund raising of the school


was assisted by the parents and other
stakeholders
100%

TOTAL

Overall Rating for Accomplishment

Prepared by:
REMEDIOS D. DE GUZMAN, Ph.D.
Principal IV
DepEd-Justino Sevilla High School

Checked by:
CARLITO S. MANDAP
Principal III
Chairman, Cluster I

Approving Authority:
LEONARDO D. ZAPANTA, Ed.D., CESO VI
Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent

ce Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)

N SUPERINTENDENT

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


ACTUAL
RESULTS

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Efficiency

Timeline

5 - Ten (10) teachers had undergone


post conferences

5 attained the objective within the target


period

4 - Nine (9) teachers had undergone


post conferences

4 attained the objective 1-2 days after


the target period

3 - Eight (8) teachers had undergone


post conferences

3 attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target period

2 - Seven (7) teachers had undergone


post conferences

2 attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target period

1 - Six (6) teachers had undergone post 1 attained the objective 7-8 days after
conferences
the target period

5 completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 attained the objective within the target


period

4 completed the target utilizing an


4 attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target period
approved working budget

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


3 - completed the target utilizing an
additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target period

2 - completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target period

1 - completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target period

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 attained the objective within the target


period

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4 attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target period
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target period

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target period

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target period

5- Attained the objective one (1) week


before the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


4- Attained the objective three (3) days
before the target date

3- Attained the objective on the target


date

2- Attained the objective three (3) days


after the target date

1- Attained the objective one (1) week


after the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


1 - Completed the target utilizing an
additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time.

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4 - objective attained one (1) day after the
additional 5% supplementary fund of the prescribed time.
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time.

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time.

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time.

5 completed the target within the 5 attained the objective within the target
approved working budget
period

4 completed the target utilizing an


4 attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the
the target period
approved working budget

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

3 - completed the target utilizing an


3 attained the objective 3-4 days after
additional 10% supplementary fund of
the target period
the approved working budget

2 - completed the target utilizing an


2 attained the objective 5-6 days after
additional 15% supplementary fund of
the target period
the approved working budget

1 - completed the target utilizing an


1 attained the objective 7-8 days after
additional 20% supplementary fund of
the target period
the approved working budget

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


1 - Completed the target utilizing an
additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after


the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after
the target date

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 -80 % of the programs were


implemented

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time.

4 -75 - 79% of the programs were


implemented

4 - objective attained one (1) day after the


prescribed time.

3 -70 - 74% of the programs were


implemented

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time.

2 -65 - 69% of the programs were


implemented

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time.

1 -60 - 64% of the programs were


implemented

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time.

5 - 100% implemented the listed Deped 5 - objective attained within the prescribed
programs
time.
4 - 95-99% implemented the listed
Deped programs

4 - objective attained one (1) day after the


prescribed time.

3 - 90-94% implemented the listed


Deped programs

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time.

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


2 - 85-89% implemented the listed
Deped programs

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time.

1 - 80-84% implemented the listed


Deped programs

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time.

5 - 100% complete and accurate


documents were submitted properly

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time/.

4 - 95 - 99% complete and accurate


documents were submitted properly

4 - objective attained one (1) day after the


prescribed time/.

3 - 90 - 94% complete and accurate


documents were submitted properly

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time/.

2 - 85 - 89% complete and accurate


documents were submitted properly

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time/.

1 - 80 -84% complete and accurate


documents were submitted properly

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time.

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time/.

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4 - objective attained one (1) day after the
additional 5% supplementary fund of the prescribed time/.
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time/.

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time/.

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


1 - Completed the target utilizing an
additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time/.

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time/.

4 - objective attained one (1) day after the


prescribed time/.

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time/.
2 - objective attained three (3) days after
the prescribed time/.
1 - objective attained four (4) days after
the prescribed time.
5 - objective attained within the prescribed
time/.
4 - objective attained one (1) day after the
prescribed time/.
3 - objective attained two (2) days after
the prescribed time/.
2 - objective attained three (3) days after
the prescribed time/.
1 - objective attained four (4) days after
the prescribed time.
5 - Completed the target within the
approved working budget

5- Attained the objective one (1) week


before the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


4 - Completed the target utilizing an
4- Attained the objective three (3) days
additional 5% supplementary fund of the before the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective on the target


date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective three (3) days


after the target date

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective one (1) week


after the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective one (1) week


before the target date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective three (3) days
additional 5% supplementary fund of the before the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective on the target


date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective three (3) days


after the target date

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective one (1) week


after the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


1 - Completed the target utilizing an
additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 - 14 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted

5 - 14 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted within the target

4 - 13 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted

4 - 13 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted within the target

3 - 12 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted

3 - 12 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted within the target

2 - 11 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted

2 - 11 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted within the target

1 - 10 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted

1 - 10 personnel (teaching and nonteaching) were promoted within the target

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


1 - Completed the target utilizing an
additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5- Attained the objective on the target


date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4- Attained the objective 1-2 days after
additional 5% supplementary fund of the the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3- Attained the objective 3-4 days after


the target date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2- Attained the objective 5-6 days after


the target date

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1- Attained the objective 7-8 days after


the target date

5 - 80% of the parents attended the PTC 5 - 80% of the parents attended the PTC
per quarter
4 - 77-79% of the parents attended the
PTC

4 - 77-79% of the parents attended the


PTC per quarter

3 - 74-76% of the parents attended the


PTC

3 - 74-76% of the parents attended the


PTC per quarter

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


2 - 71-73% of the parents attended the
PTC

2 - 71-73% of the parents attended the


PTC per quarter

1 - 68-70% of the parents attended the


PTC

1 - 68-70% of the parents attended the


PTC per quarter

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time.

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4 - objective attained one (1) day after the
additional 5% supplementary fund of the prescribed time.
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time.

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time.

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time.

5 - 80% of the parents attended the


meetings

5 - 80% of the parents attended the


meetings per quarter

4 - 77-79% of the parents attended the


meetings

4 - 77-79% of the parents attended the


meetings per quarter

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


3 - 74-76% of the parents attended the
meetings

3 - 74-76% of the parents attended the


meetings per quarter

2 - 71-73% of the parents attended the


meetings

2 - 71-73% of the parents attended the


meetings per quarter

1 - 68-71% of the parents attended the


meetings

1 - 68-71% of the parents attended the


meetings per quarter

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 - Attained the objective one (1) week


before the target date

4 - Completed the target utilizing an


4 - Attained the objective three (3) days
additional 5% supplementary fund of the before the target date
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 - Attained the objective on the target


date

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 - Attained the objective three (3) days


after the target date

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 - Attained the objective one (1) week


after the target date

5 - Completed the target within the


approved working budget

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time.

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


4 - Completed the target utilizing an
4 - objective attained one (1) day after the
additional 5% supplementary fund of the prescribed time.
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 10% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

3 - objective attained two (2) days after


the prescribed time.

2 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 15% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

2 - objective attained three (3) days after


the prescribed time.

1 - Completed the target utilizing an


additional 20% supplementary fund of
the approved working budget

1 - objective attained four (4) days after


the prescribed time.

5 - objective attained within the prescribed


time.
4 - objective attained one (1) day after the
prescribed time.
3 - objective attained two (2) days after
the prescribed time.
2 - objective attained three (3) days after
the prescribed time.
1 - objective attained four (4) days after
the prescribed time.
5 - 80% of the parents assisted the fund 5 - Attained the objective one (1) week
raising
before the target date

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Average
Rating

SCORE

ACTUAL
RESULTS

ERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


4 - 77-79% of the parents assisted the
fund raising

4 - Attained the objective three (3) days


before the target date

3 - 74-76% of the parents assisted the


fund raising

3 - Attained the objective on the target


date

2 - 71-73%of the parents assisted the


fund raising

2 - Attained the objective three (3) days


after the target date

1 - 68-71% of the parents assisted the


fund raising

1 - Attained the objective one (1) week


after the target date

Recommending Approval:
ROWENA T. QUIAMBAO, CESE
Officer-In-Charge
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Average
Rating

SCORE

También podría gustarte