Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10663902
CITATIONS
READS
26
55
3 authors:
Nevzat Karabulut
Baki Yagci
Pamukkale University
Pamukkale University
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Aysun Karabulut
50 PUBLICATIONS 223 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
1
1
Department of Radiology, Pamukkale University Hospital, 20010, Denizli and 2Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Denizli State Hospital, 20010, Denizli, Turkey
Abstract. The flow pattern in intrarenal veins depends on renal parenchymal histology and cardiac physiology.
The intrarenal venous impedance index obtained by Doppler ultrasound is related to compliance in vein, and
can be helpful in the assessment of renal parenchymal compliance. The purpose of this study was to determine
whether normal pregnancy has a significant effect on intrarenal venous blood flow, and assess if the
physiological pyelocaliectasis causes a measurable reduction in venous impedance indexes in pregnant women.
Doppler ultrasound of intrarenal veins was performed in 35 asymptomatic pregnant women in the second and
third trimester of gestation, and in 24 non-pregnant healthy women. After grading the degree of
hydronephrosis, venous impedance index was obtained from the interlobar veins. The venous waveforms in
pregnant women showed diminished phasic oscillations owing to elevated pre-systolic flow. The mean venous
impedance indexes in pregnant women were significantly lower than the values in non-pregnant subjects,
0.300.10 versus 0.440.06 in the right (p,0.001), and 0.360.11 versus 0.410.07 in the left kidney
(p50.03). There was an inverse correlation between the grade of pelvicalyceal dilatation and the venous
impedance indexes in both kidneys in pregnant women (r520.62, p,0.001 for the right kidney, and r520.38,
p50.05 for the left kidney). An abnormally reduced venous impedance index in pregnant women can at least in
part be explained by reduced vascular compliance from increased interstitial pressure subsequent to partial
obstruction of ureters by the gravid uterus, and caution should be exercised in interpreting it as a sign of
pathological ureteral obstruction.
444
Doppler ultrasound
All pregnant women and healthy control subjects were
examined by B-mode and duplex Doppler ultrasound
using a commercially available colour Doppler scanner
The British Journal of Radiology, July 2003
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed with the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences computer program
version 9.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The results were
expressed as meanstandard deviation. Student t-test was
used to determine if the venous impedance indexes were
different between pregnant and non-pregnant women, and
whether there were any differences between kidneys of
pregnant women without pyelocalyceal dilatation and the
kidneys of control group. Paired Student t-test was
performed to investigate whether the impedance indexes
were significantly different between right and left kidneys
in pregnant women. The non-parametric MannWhitney
U test was used to compare the venous impedance indexes
Results
The mean intrarenal venous impedance indexes in
pregnant and non-pregnant women are summarized in
Table 1. The venous impedance indexes were significantly
lower in pregnant women than the values in non-pregnant
subjects (p,0.001 for the right and p50.03 for the left
kidney). The venous waveforms in pregnant women
showed diminished phasic oscillations due to elevated
pre-systolic flow (Figure 2). The difference in venous
impedance indexes between right and left kidneys was
significant in pregnant women (p50.01), but not in nonpregnant subjects (p50.13). In pregnant women, the
venous impedance indexes between second and third
trimester were slightly different in the right kidney
(p50.04), but no statistical difference was found in the
left kidney (p50.09).
Overall the collecting system dilatation was present in 20
(28.6%) of 70 kidneys in pregnant women, and it was more
frequent and severe on the right side than on the left.
There were no cases of severe or high-grade physiological
hydronephrosis. There were 7 (20%) grade 2, and 9
(25.7%) grade 1 pyelocaliectasis in right kidneys, and there
were only 4 (11.4%) grade 1 pyelocaliectasis in left kidneys.
No collecting system dilatation was seen in control
subjects and in 19 (54.3%) right and 31 (88.6%) left
kidneys in pregnant women. Table 2 reveals the mean
venous impedance indexes for kidneys of pregnant
subjects, grouped according to presence and degree of
pyelocaliectasis. There was an inverse correlation between
the grade of pelvicalyceal dilatation and the venous
impedance indexes in both kidneys in 35 pregnant
women (r520.62, p,0.001 for the right kidney, and
r520.38, p50.05 for the left kidney). The venous
impedance indexes were significantly different among the
pregnant women with different degree of pyelocaliectasis
Table 1. The mean venous impedance indexes in right and left
kidneys in pregnant and non-pregnant women
Group
Impedance index
Right
Left
0.300.10
0.340.10
0.360.11
0.390.10
0.280.09
0.330.10
0.440.06
0.410.07
445
0
1
2
Total
Left
Impedance index n
Impedance index
19
9
7
35
0.350.08
0.290.07
0.190.09
0.300.10
0.370.10
0.230.08
0.360.11
31
4
35
(p50.001 for the right, and p50.03 for the left kidney).
The venous impedance indexes were also reduced in the
kidneys of pregnant women without pyelocalyceal dilatation compared with the kidneys of control group
(p,0.001).
Discussion
Maternal pyelocaliectasis is a frequent finding during
pregnancy, and differentiation from pathological renal
obstruction can be difficult. Doppler investigation of
maternal kidneys and ureteral jet flows has been shown
to be useful adjunct to grey scale ultrasound [36]. The
Doppler ultrasound of kidneys has been directed mostly
toward the main and intrarenal arteries for the evaluation
of ureteral obstruction [1013], and the mean intrarenal
arterial resistivity indexes have been shown to remain
unaffected by physiological pyelocaliectasis or altered
renal haemodynamics in pregnancy [35]. On the other
hand, the Doppler analysis of intrarenal veins in various
renal diseases has not been investigated widely. Only
recently has the venous Doppler ultrasound technique
been usefully applied to evaluation of ureteral obstruction,
in which intrarenal venous flow has been shown to be
affected to a greater extent than the arterial flow showing
elevated peak flow and minor reduction in pre-systolic
flows [7]. However, to date no studies have addressed the
use of venous Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy. This
study is the first investigating the changes in intrarenal
venous impedance in pregnant women.
446
References
1. Horowitz E, Schmidt JD. Renal calculi in pregnancy. Clin
Obstet Gynecol 1985;28:2348.
2. Swanson SK, Heilman RL, Eversman WG. Urinary tract
stones in pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 1995;75:12342.
3. Hertzberg BS, Carroll BA, Bowie JD, et al. Doppler US
assessment of maternal kidneys: analysis of intrarenal
resistivity indexes in normal pregnancy and physiologic
pyelocaliectasis. Radiology 1993;186:68992.
4. Kara SA, Toppare MF, Sarac E. Pyelocaliectasis and
intrarenal artery Doppler indices in uncomplicated pregnancies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;48:1821.
5. Nazarian GK, Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Renal duplex
Doppler sonography in asymptomatic women during pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12:4414.
6. Karabulut N, Karabulut A. Colour Doppler evaluation of
ureteral jets in normal second and third trimester pregnancy:
effect of patient position. Br J Radiol 2002;75:3515.
7. Bateman GA, Cuganesan R. Renal vein Doppler sonography
of obstructive uropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;
178:9215.
8. Wichman K, Ryden G. Blood pressure and renal function
during normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
1986;65:5616.
9. Peake S, Roxburgh H, Langlois SLP. Ultrasonic assessment
of hydronephrosis of pregnancy. Radiology 1983;146:16770.
10. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal obstruction:
evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional
US. Radiology 1993;186:6858.
11. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Distinction between obstructive
and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis with duplex Doppler
sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:9971000.
12. Rodgers PM, Bates JA, Irving HC. Intrarenal Doppler
ultrasound studies in normal and acutely obstructed kidneys.
Br J Radiol 1992;65:20712.
13. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH, DiPietro MA. Duplex Doppler
US of the kidney: differentiation of obstructive from
nonobstructive dilatation. Radiology 1989;171:5157.
14. Rasmussen PE, Nielsen FR. Hydronephrosis during pregnancy: a literature survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
1988;27:24959.
15. Beydoun SN. Morphologic changes in the renal tract in
pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985;28:24956.
16. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Superior vena cava and
hepatic vein Doppler echocardiography in healthy adults. J
Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:10329.
17. Platt JF. Duplex Doppler evaluation of native kidney
dysfunction: obstructive and nonobstructive disease. AJR
Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:103542.
18. Roobottom CA, Hunter JD, Weston MJ, Dubbins PA.
Hepatic venous Doppler waveforms: changes in pregnancy. J
Clin Ultrasound 1995;23:47782.
447