Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
English 120
Professor Lebacqz
December 11, 2016
Sincerely,
Alexis Chavez
Chavez 2
UNM English 120 student
Chavez 3
based on public opinion and religion), the ethicality of euthanasia, as well as the immense profit
that the government sees by continuously providing patients with life-prolonging drugs. In the
meantime, amid all of this arguing, debating, and voting there are hopeless individuals battling
detrimental diseases.
Euthanasia provides the necessary option for those who are subject to suffer a cruel death
to choose how much they are willing to put themselves, their families, and their finances
through. However, this choice to die with dignity is not legal in most states and forces families of
those afflicted to watch the slow, certain death of their loved ones unfold. Euthanasia should be
made legal across the United States and those profiting off its illegality taxed to ensure there are
no ulterior motives which fuel the negative stigma that physician assisted suicide has received.
Problem Analysis
The issues of Euthanasia not being legalized in the United States in its entirety, lies with
the main issue, I believe, of profit. Someones disease- particularly life-long or terminal ones- is
a huge payday in the eyes of a pharmaceutical company. In 2015, North American
pharmaceutical companies held almost 50% of the global pharmaceutical market revenue
(President). That number rose since 2012 almost 10% (President). Those numbers are
astoundingly high compared to other countries such as Japan with only about 8% of the market
revenue (President).
Chavez 4
Europe
America
Chavez 5
(Campbell). In fact, a certain drug commonly prescribed to patients suffering Mantle Cell
Carcinoma is known to profit Johnson & Johnson about $6 billion in annual sales (Campbell).
Even those with an incurable illness that want to stop treatment and choose when to pass
on from this world cant because their physician would be arrested, or themselves left with social
stigma. Pharmaceutical companies see them as valued customers who keep coming and paying
repeatedly. If their customers were to stop coming and choose euthanasia, that would leave a
huge gap in their income. Should a company that is supposed to be providing life-saving
medicine really be allowed to gather such a huge profit off its customers non-consensual
suffering and sickness?
These patients are forced to be continuously treated just to live a life they no longer wish
to. Imagine being hooked up and pumped full of these life-saving drugs after you have decided
that you dont want to be remembered this way against your will while your loved ones watch
you shrivel away. This is a huge ethical problem. Is it any more ethical to deny someone your
assistance in their death than to force them to live against their will?
Solution
Based on these facts and reasoning, I am proposing that there be laws passed against the
Pharmaceutical companies impeding their financial gains. This law would tax the companies on
their profit from the most commonly prescribed drugs for terminal illnesses: acetaminophen,
morphine, haloperidol, lorazepam, prochlorperazine, and atropine (Sera, Leah, et. Al.).
Acetaminophen has proven since 2014 to be extremely profitable; Zion search analysis 2015
showed in 2014, 149.3 kilotons of the drug were sold making the Global acetaminophen market
worth 801.3 million dollars. A projection done, by Zion search analysis, in 2020 shows that it is
Chavez 6
estimated the Global acetaminophen market will be worth 999.4 million dollars. Per a study done
by Statista in 2011, morphine had a total revenue of 389.6 million dollars. The other medicines
have a similar outcome with extremely high revenues as well. These drugs are not cures, simply
medicines prescribed to help cope with the discomfort form the disease which a patient needs to
live out the rest of their lives which are primarily given to patients already in hospice care (Sear,
Leah, et. Al.).
Chavez 7
There would also be rallies held with testimonials from the families of those who chose
to die with dignity explaining what an amazing gift it is to choose to have control of your life
even in the last days. Again, these rallies would be aimed to touch the attendees emotionally and
shed light on what could be hindering terminally ill Americans from obtaining peaceful relief.
These rallies and advertisements would ultimately translate into votes to either pass or deny the
presented law. After going through many searches on the internet, I was not able to find any
record of rallies held that did in fact make a positive impact on the efforts toward legalization or
taxation, however, this idea is still very plausible as there are rallies which historically have
made a difference such as the Dr. Martin Luther Kings March on Washington and the Berlin
wall protests (Whipps).
There is one main limitation to this plan- funding. It does cost money as well as resources
to implement advertising to the public. Such a limitation could be helped by setting up a
GoFundMe page or holding several fundraisers, however, there is always the possibility that we
would not be able to reach the monetary goal. Another limitation would be over coming public
opinion. Euthanasia has a very strong negative stigma which stems from others religions as well
as public opinions, so expression of these thoughts could also sway away some voters.
Conclusion
Kim Teske is a 52-year-old woman who has been
diagnosed with Huntingtons disease, a
degenerative, terminal sentence. Many patients that
are diagnosed with this illness have about 25 years
left, however, these years are painful and force the
Kim Teske after not eating for 1 week being
cared for by her sister
Chavez 8
Chavez 9
Works Cited
Campbell, Kevin, Dr. "The High Cost of Terminal Illness: Big Pharma Cashes In on Hope." Dr.
Kevin Campbell, MD. Dr. Kevin Campbell, MD, 14 Nov. 2013. Web. 16 Nov. 2016.
<https://drkevincampbellmd.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/the-high-cost-of-terminalillness-big-pharma-cashes-in-on-hope/>.
Martin, Sandra. "Kim's Choice: Inside One Woman's Decision to Starve Herself to Death." The
Globe and Mail. The Globe and Mail, n.d. Web. 26 Nov. 2016.
<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/kims-choice-how-onefamily-confronts-a-genetic-time-bomb/article19657030/>.
"New Health Guide." Where Is Euthanasia Legal? New Health Guide, 17 Nov. 2016. Web. 17
Nov. 2016.
President, BCG Senior Vice. "Global Pharma Market Revenue." Statista. N.p., 2016. Web. 15
Nov. 2016.
Sera, Leah, Mary Lynn McPherson, and Holly M. Holmes. "Commonly Prescribed Medications
in a Population of Hospice Patients." The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care.
U.S. National Library of Medicine, Mar. 2014. Web. 17 Nov. 2016.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830696/>.
"Top Pain Drug Sales in the United States 2011-2012 | Statistic." Statista. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Nov.
2016. <https://www.statista.com/statistics/242678/revenues-of-top-pain-drugs-in-the-us2011-2012/>.
Chavez 10