Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
than stress content informational knowledge (Feinstein, 2010). Holbrook & Rannikmae (2009) put
forward a definition of scientific literacy to encompass the creative use of evidence based knowledge
and skills while recognising personal and social attributes. A later paper (Choi, 2011) suggested the
need to include further aspects such as meta-cognitive and self-directing student abilities
alongside content knowledge, habits of mind, character and values and science as a human
endeavor. As the interpretation of scientific literacy comes closer to the needs of the future
workforce, so is the need to interrelate science and technology as promoting scientific and
technological literacy. So also is the need to see science teaching towards STL in a more
meaningful or relevant focus with respect to society.
Education through Science
The concern with the standard approach to the teaching of science, referred to here as science
through education is twofold:
(a) students do not see this educational provision as interesting;
(b) educational learning is limited to attributes seen by scientists as important for acquiring a
scientific base.
An alternative approach, focusing heavily on concerns 3 and 4 in Fenshams list is seen as education
through science, (Holbrook & Rannikmae, 2007). The educational learning to be acquired through
science lessons is thus the focus and science is the vehicle (that which is providing the content). The
range of education goals identified for schooling are all considered important for science education
and science teaching is intended to promote student learning in all such goals, irrespective of
whether they have a specificity to science content, or are transversal and developed in a similar
manner across all taught subjects. This means that both cognitive knowledge and process skill goals
intended as part of the intellectual development of students are important, as well as skills
associated with the development of the person and the development of skills related to the social
situation, social values and interpersonal relations.
In most educational systems, science education is an integral part of the total education provision
within a school. Unless it is argued that different subjects cover different educational domains, all
subjects taught need to relate to the full spectrum of educational goals. By recognising that science
education is part of the education provision within schools, the teaching of science subjects can be
expected to promote the development of a range of skills and values, identified within the
educational goals and especially to enable students to solve problems of a scientific nature and make
appropriate socio-subject decisions, in this case, socio-scientific (Holbrook & Rannikme, 2002).
Science education is thus far more than an understanding of science conceptual ideas.
Making Science Education Relevant
A major factor in making science in school more popular, and expected to lead to greater public awareness of
science by students in the future, is the relevance of the learning in the eyes of students (Holbrook, 2008).
This relevance is clearly associated with the establishment of meaningful goals for science education (and
hence education itself) and with the giving of attention to addressing the emerging issues in science
education. In particular, it is recognised that through science education:
Students need to see the relevance of the learning, as it applies to them personally (their own lives, their
career expectations, the wishes of their parents), or the relevance as it applies to society (wishes of the
community, employers, the school, the curriculum) (Fensham, 2008).
While the science provision in school, i.e. the science (or science and technology) education, is expected
to guide students to achieve the goals of education through science, there is also the motivational factor
to consider (Ryan & Deci, 2000).
It is important for students to better appreciate the relevance of the science component in their
education (Holbrook & Rannikmae, 2009).
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for enhancing Scientific Literacy.
International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
Holbrook, J.; Rannikme, M. (2002). Scientific and technological literacy for all- and important philosophy for
Science subjects. In: K. Niinist; H. Kukemelk & L. Kemppinene. (Eds.). Developing teacher education in
Estonia). Tartu, Turku: Painosalama Oy, 205- 214.
Lazonder, W., Pascal, W., & Hagemans, M. G. (2008). The influence of domain knowledge on strategy use
during simulation-based inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 18, 580-592.
Levy, F., & Murnane, R.J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lewis, J. & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of Socio-scientific Issues: The Role of science knowledge. International
Journal of Science Education 28 (11), 1267-1287.
National Research Council (NRC) (2010). Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills:
A Workshop Summary. Margaret Hilton, Rapporteur. Board on Science Education, Center for Education,
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its
implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
Paris, S.G., Lipson, M.Y., and Wixson, K.K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 8, 293-316.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education and Competitiveness: A Resource and
Policy Guide. Retrieved from: www.21stcenturyskills.org.
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: classic Definitions and New Directions.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 5467.