Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
http://jsn.sagepub.com/
Pilot Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Among Sedentary Urban Middle School Girls : A
Two-Group Pretest Posttest Quasi-Experimental Design
Lorraine B. Robbins, Karin A. Pfeiffer, Kimberly S. Maier, Yun-Jia Lo and Stacey M. Wesolek (LaDrig)
The Journal of School Nursing 2012 28: 302 originally published online 3 April 2012
DOI: 10.1177/1059840512438777
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://jsn.sagepub.com/content/28/4/302
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for The Journal of School Nursing can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://jsn.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://jsn.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Research Article
Abstract
The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether girls in one school receiving nurse counseling plus an
after-school physical activity club showed greater improvement in physical activity, cardiovascular fitness, and body composition than girls assigned to an attention control condition in another school (N 69). Linear regressions controlling for
baseline measures showed no statistically significant group differences, but the directionality of differences was consistent
with greater intervention group improvement for minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity/hour (t 0.95, p .35),
cardiovascular fitness (t 1.26, p .22), body mass index (BMI; t 1.47, p .15), BMI z score (t 1.19, p .24), BMI
percentile (t 0.59, p .56), percentage body fat (t 0.86, p .39), and waist circumference (t 0.19, p .85). Findings
support testing with a larger sample.
Keywords
adolescents, physical activity, intervention
Introduction
Current U.S. health-related youth physical activity recommendations call for at least 1 hr everyday with most of the
time being spent engaging in moderate to vigorous physical
activity (MVPA; U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services [USDHHS], 2008). Only 3.4% of girls in middle
and early high school meet the recommendations (Troiano
et al., 2008). MVPA declines 4% among girls between sixth
and eighth grades, with disadvantaged minorities in urban
areas being particularly at risk (Pate et al., 2009; Wang
et al., 2007; Wilson, 2009). Increasing MVPA in this population is a vital public health priority (Eaton et al., 2010).
Adolescent MVPA is negatively associated with girls
body mass index (BMI) and adiposity (Kimm et al., 2005).
Overweight or obese adolescent girls are at greater risk for
health issues, such as high blood pressure and lipid levels
(Freedman, Mei, Srinivasan, Berenson, & Dietz, 2007). Many
will become overweight or obese adult women (Serdula et al.,
1993) at risk for premature mortality (van Dam, Willett,
Manson, & Hu, 2006). Intervention prior to high school is
critical because, by ninth grade, over 25% of the adolescent
girls are already overweight or obese (Eaton et al., 2010).
Corresponding Author:
Lorraine B. Robbins, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, Michigan State University College
of Nursing, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Email: robbin76@msu.edu
Robbins et al.
303
Background
Schools have become the focal point for interventions to
increase adolescent physical activity. Although physical
activity during the school day is important, students academic achievement demands limit the amount and quality
of physical activity. For example, physical education (PE)
class provides only 811% of students daily physical activity (Tudor-Locke, Lee, Morgan, Beighle, & Pangrazi, 2006).
Clearly, innovative approaches must either minimize school
day time requirements or involve after-school programming
(Yin et al., 2005). Decreasing negative perceptions regarding physical activity is essential for participation, and
after-school physical activity may be a particularly palatable
option for girls, some of whom opt out of PE (Schofield,
Mummery, & Schofield, 2005) due to concerns about sweating during the school day (Taylor et al., 1999). Although
after-school interventions offer a promising approach, evidence supporting their effectiveness for increasing physical
activity is mixed (Barbeau et al., 2007; Robinson et al.,
2003; Robinson et al., 2010; Story et al., 2003), and those
designed for girls exclusively remain limited, despite being
identified as important for meeting girls needs (Debate,
Pettee Gabriel, Zwald, Huberty, & Zhang, 2009).
Because individual thoughts and feelings about physical
activity can influence girls engagement in the behavior, a
group- or environmental-level intervention alone, although
important, may be insufficient for addressing unique personal perceptions relative to physical activity or increasing
personal motivation to engage in or continue the behavior
(Summerbell et al., 2005). This contention is supported by
a recent large-scale intervention study linking schools to
community organizations that yielded no differences in
MVPA between racially diverse girls in middle schools
receiving the intervention and those in control schools after
2 years and only modest between-group differences after 3
years (Webber et al., 2008).
Attending to individual-level needs may offer a compelling strategy for enhancing intervention efficacy. Individualized counseling has been identified by high school girls in
PE classes as necessary for helping them to increase their
physical activity (Neumark-Sztainer, Martin, & Story,
2000). Individualized counseling tailored to personal characteristics, such as those reported on a questionnaire, has
been found to be more effective in changing behavior than
a one size fits all approach (De Bourdeaudhuij et al.,
2010; Kreuter, Farrell, Olevitch, & Brennan, 2000).
Method
Design and Sample
This pilot employed a two-group pretestposttest quasiexperimental design, with two middle schools from the same
urban school district in the Midwestern U.S., randomized to
each condition (Killen & Robinson, 1988). The sample size
requirement was based on power calculations for schoolbased research (Murray, 1998) and calculated using MVPA
as the primary outcome. Power calculations used estimates
of variance components and within-group correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) from the Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG; Murray et al., 2006), an
intervention study with a similar population. An effect size
of 0.5 was chosen. Using an estimate of the variance of
MVPA from TAAG (standard deviation [SD] 11.7 min/
day, based on an 18-hr day), this effect size corresponds to
5.85 minutes per day or 0.33 min/hr of MVPA, a reasonable
estimate, given the accumulation of MVPA afforded by the
design of the intervention (described below). Sample size
requirements allowed for 20% attrition (Luepker et al.,
304
Measures
Demographic Variables
Age, academic grade, and race were measured using
single multiple-choice items. Socioeconomic status (SES)
was coded as 1 if parents/guardians indicated on consent
forms that their daughter participated in the free and reduced
lunch program and 0 otherwise.
Robbins et al.
305
Randomization by school
Excluded (n = 3)
Unavailable for data
collection (n = 1)
Not interested in study (n = 1)
Relocated ( n = 1)
Lost (n = 17)
Changed schools over
summer (n = 15)
Chose alternative afterschool activity (n = 2)
Analyzed (n = 37)
Analyzed (n = 32)
and .88 at baseline and .84 and .86 at postintervention for the
Perceived Benefits and Barriers scales, respectively.
Perceived physical activity self-efficacy. Confidence in overcoming barriers to physical activity (e.g., Im sure that I
can still do my exercise even if I am tired) was measured
as the mean response to the 17-item Perceived Physical
Activity Self-Efficacy scale. Each item had four response
choices ranging from 1 not at all true to 4 very true.
Construct validity has been established with a comparable
age group (Wu, Robbins, & Hsieh, 2011). In this study,
306
Procedure
Prior to the intervention, school nurses and research staff
were trained. School nurses completed 2 days of training
conducted by the first author and a project consultant who
was also a member of the Motivational Interviewing
Network of Trainers. Training was comprised of didactic
contact, demonstrations, and role-playing. Opportunities for
the nurse to practice and receive feedback from the first
author and consultant continued until both agreed that the
nurse satisfactorily addressed all cognitive and affective
variables, while demonstrating the motivational interviewing communication style and strategies. All staff members
completed 2 days of training on physical activity, cardiovascular fitness, and body composition measurement.
Assisted by the school nurse at each school, the project
manager scheduled data collection times for each girl during
the school day. At baseline, the trained research assistants
escorted small groups of participants in each school from
their classrooms to the library, where members of the
research team explained the study and related procedures,
and each girl completed the questionnaire via paper and pencil. Then, the first author created two identical computer
printouts summarizing each intervention school girls key
responses to the baseline questionnaire (e.g., based on mean
scores or sums associated with the instruments measuring
cognitive and affective variables). Research assistants
Robbins et al.
307
n (%)
2 (5.4)
11 (29.7)
17 (46.0)
7 (18.9)
of increasing her MVPA (motivational interviewing strategy). At the end of the final counseling session, the nurse
encouraged each girl to continue her MVPA after the intervention ended and explored ways to accomplish the task.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social
Sciences (SPSS) Predictive Analytic Software (PASW) Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0.2 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,
IL). Data from all participants completing the study were
analyzed with an intention to treat approach. The effect introduced by the clustering of girls within schools was examined
by estimating the population within- and between-group variances; the estimated between-group variance was a small
negative number (0.0156) that was subsequently set to 0
(Snijders & Bosker, 1999), thus eliminating the need to correct standard errors for clustering.
Pearson chi-square analyses for categorical variables and
independent sample t tests for continuous data were conducted to test for baseline group differences in demographic
variables. Independent sample t tests were used to determine
group differences at baseline and 6 months in measures of
physical activity, cardiovascular fitness, and body composition; and cognitive and affective variables related to
physical activity. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess intervention effects on these outcome
measures at 6 months. All regression analyses controlled
for baseline measures. In the event of a statistically significant intervention effect, the plan was to explore the role of
cognitive and affective variables related to physical activity as mediators. Listwise deletion was used to address
missing data in all models.
Results
Intervention Delivery
The Physical Activity Club was conducted over 24 weeks;
but, due to several no-school days, the girls had the opportunity to attend on 98 different days, resulting in the club
being available on average 4.1 days/week during the intervention. The 37 girls in the intervention group attended an
average of 1.6 days/week. Table 1 includes additional
information on intervention dose as measured by physical
activity club attendance.
308
Control (n 32)
n (%)
Intervention (n 37)
n (%)
w2
0.15
23 (71.9)
9 (28.1)
25 (67.6)
12 (32.4)
12.00**
11
2
13
4
2
0
(34.4)
(6.3)
(40.6)
(12.5)
(6.3)
(0.00)
24
4
3
5
1
0
(64.9)
(10.8)
(8.1)
(13.5)
(2.7)
(0.00)
25
6
1
Mean
11.44
(78.1)
(18.8)
(3.1)
(SD)
(0.67)
28
7
2
Mean
11.49
(75.7)
(18.9)
(5.4)
(SD)
(0.84)
0.00
t
0.27
**p .01.
309
3.35 (0.47) n 31
2.05 (0.54) n 31
3.23 (0.54) n 31
3.31 (0.60) n 31
33.58 (19.01) n 31
6.23 (2.22) n 30
5.30 (2.67) n 27
Control
Mean (SD)
3.49
2.30
3.16
3.18
41.36
6.73
6.20
(0.47) n 37
(0.71) n 37
(0.68) n 37
(0.69) n 37
(20.12) n 36
(1.85) n 37
(2.36) n 35
Intervention
Mean (SD)
1.23
1.60
0.46
0.84
1.62
1.00
1.41
t
3.33
2.19
3.07
3.06
39.73
6.71
6.16
(0.65) n 32
(0.56) n 32
(0.69) n 32
(0.73) n 32
(20.02) n 30
(2.05) n 31
(2.68) n 32
Control
Mean (SD)
Intervention
Mean (SD)
3.35 (0.55) n 36
2.32 (0.58) n 35
2.99 (0.63) n 35
2.86 (0.71) n 35
39.68 (19.12) n 28
6.46 (2.15) n 33
6.27 (2.03) n 30
6 Months
Intervention
Mean (SD)
0.69 (0.28) n 25
10.50 (4.72) n 28
25.94 (7.39) n 37
1.28 (1.14) n 37
80.03 (26.76) n 37
34.02 (11.28) n 37
80.78 (18.45) n 36
Control
Mean (SD)
1.08 (0.69) n 17
14.10 (7.44) n 30
24.88 (7.98) n 31
1.09 (1.09) n 31
77.03 (26.39) n 31
31.98 (11.60) n 31
79.57 (17.80) n 32
Control
Mean (SD)
1.20 (0.65) n 18
12.73 (7.54) n 30
25.50 (7.90) n 32
1.21 (1.08) n 32
80.23 (23.48) n 32
32.74 (11.25) n 32
79.10 (15.58) n 32
t
2.24*
2.22*
0.57
0.67
0.46
0.73
0.27
1.05
11.29
26.59
1.39
83.26
34.02
80.45
(0.41) n 20
(7.28) n 34
(7.40) n 36
(1.01) n 36
(22.57) n 36
(10.83) n 36
(17.17) n 36
Intervention
Mean (SD)
6 Months
0.15
1.44
1.09
0.18
3.03
1.28
1.35
0.15
0.96
0.45
1.14
0.01
0.49
0.18
0.07 (0.51)
0.86 (6.63)
0.74 (0.73)
0.12 (0.18)
3.05 (5.68)
0.89 (1.42)
0.48 (4.69)
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Control
Mean (SD)
12
28
31
31
31
28
32
Intervention
Mean (SD)
0.43 (0.41)
2.56 (6.59)
0.41 (1.02)
0.06 (0.18)
1.94 (4.59)
0.48 (1.85)
0.87 (4.54)
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Intervention
Mean (SD)
18
25
36
36
36
36
35
0.12 (0.51) n 36
0.01 (0.58) n 35
0.12 (0.84) n 35
0.29 (0.77) n 35
4.04 (21.70) n 27
0.39 (2.73) n 33
0.46 (2.35) n 28
Change
0.01 (0.76) n 31
0.10 (0.62) n 31
0.11 (0.73) n 31
0.21 (0.72) n 31
6.90 (22.63) n 30
0.62 (2.27) n 29
1.26 (3.01) n 27
Control
Mean (SD)
Change
Note. Cardiovascular fitness number of PACER laps. Waist circumference was measured in centimeter (cm). Change was computed for only girls who had both baseline and 6-month measures.
*p < .05.
Minutes of MVPA/hour
Cardiovascular fitness
BMI, kg/m2
BMI z score
BMI percentile for age
Percentage body fat
Waist circumference
Variable
Baseline
Table 4. Means of Physical Activity, Cardiovascular Fitness, and Body Composition Measures at Baseline and 6 Months
Note. Change was computed for only girls who had both baseline and 6-month measures.
Variable
Baseline
310
Table 5. Linear Regression of Intervention Effect on Physical Activity, Cardiovascular Fitness, Body Composition Measures, and Cognitive
and Affective Variables at 6 MonthsControlling for Baseline Measure
Intervention effect
SE
0.16
2.32
0.33
0.04
0.57
0.35
0.19
0.16
1.85
0.22
0.04
0.97
0.41
1.02
.16
.15
.02
.02
.01
.02
.01
0.95
1.26
1.47
1.19
0.59
0.86
0.19
.35
.22
.15
.24
.56
.39
.85
0.03
0.05
0.10
0.17
4.20
0.60
0.70
0.14
0.12
0.16
0.16
5.11
0.50
0.60
.03
.04
.08
.12
.11
.16
.16
0.23
0.40
0.64
1.03
0.82
1.21
1.17
.82
.69
.52
.31
.42
.23
.25
Note. MVPA moderate to vigorous physical activity; BMI body mass index; SE standard error.
Discussion
The study was designed to test a multicomponent physical
activity intervention with middle school girls. Recruitment
goals were met, with 38 in the intervention and 35 in the control school completing the baseline measures. Only one girl in
the intervention school and three girls in the control school
were unable to complete the 6-month measures due to family
relocation to a different geographical area. Although the intervention group had a greater number of Black girls and fewer
White girls than the control group, the sample in each school
was racially diverse and of low SES, with over 75.0% participating in the free and reduced lunch program.
Robbins et al.
311
312
Conclusion
Structured after-school programs conducted in schools
afford students an opportunity to engage in enjoyable physical activities with peers in a supportive setting perceived by
parents/guardians as being safe and having positive role
models (Pate & ONeill, 2009). While the intervention
effect in this pilot study was non-significant in the statistical model, its directionality, along with the positive gain
related to the effect size, lends support for continued evaluation of the intervention with a larger sample of girls. Our
results are encouraging, but suggest that some refinement
in certain areas is needed based on the lessons learned from
this small-scale study.
Authors Note
The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert McMurray, Professor,
University of North Carolina, for conducting two days of training
in measuring physical activity, cardiovascular fitness, and body
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The
study was made possible by Grant Number R21HL090705 from the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at the National
Institutes of Health (NIH); PI: L. B. Robbins. The content of this
publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not
necessarily represent the official views of the NHLBI or NIH. The
Middle School Physical Activity Intervention for Girls study
was also funded by the Michigan State University (MSU) College
of Nursing and MSU Families and Communities Together Coalition. The funding bodies did not have a role in or influence the various phases of the project, the writing of the manuscript, or the
decision to submit it for publication.
References
Barbeau, P., Johnson, M. H., Howe, C. A., Allison, J., Davis, C. L.,
Gutin, B., & Lemmon, C. R. (2007). Ten months of exercise
improves general and visceral adiposity, bone, and fitness in
black girls. Obesity, 15, 2077-2085.
Catellier, D. J., Hannan, P. J., Murray, D. M., Addy, C. L., Conway,
T. L., Yang, S., & Rice, J. C. (2005). Imputation of missing data
when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Medicine
& Science in Sports & Exercise, 37, S555-S562.
CDC. (2008). Make a difference at your school. Washington, DC:
USDHHS. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.cdc.gov/
healthyyouth/keystrategies/pdf/make-a-difference.pdf
Debate, R. D., Pettee, G. K., Zwald, M., Huberty, J., & Zhang, Y.
(2009). Changes in psychosocial factors and physical activity
frequency among third- to eighth-grade girls who participated
in a developmentally focused youth sport program: A preliminary study. Journal of School Health, 79, 474-484.
De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Maes, L., De Henauw, S., De Vriendt, T.,
Moreno, L. A., Kersting, M., . . . Haerens, L; HELENA Study
Group. (2010). Evaluation of a computer-tailored physical
activity intervention in adolescents in six European countries:
The Activ-O-Meter in the HELENA intervention study. Journal
of Adolescent Health, 46, 458-466.
Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., . . . Wechsler, H; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2010). Youth risk behavior surveillance
Robbins et al.
313
314
Story, M., Sherwood, N. E., Himes, J. H., Davis, M., Jacobs, D. R.,
Jr., Cartwright, Y., . . . Rochon, J. (2003). An after-school
obesity prevention program for African-American girls: The
Minnesota GEMS pilot study. Ethnicity & Disease, 13,
S54-S64.
Summerbell, C. D., Waters, E., Edmunds, L. D., Kelly, S. A. M.,
Brown, T., & Campbell, K. J. (2005). Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, 3, CD001871.
Taylor, W. C., Yancey, A. K., Leslie, J., Murray, N. G., Cummings,
S. S., Sharkey, S. A., . . . McCarthy, W. J. (1999). Physical
activity among African American and Latino middle school
girls: Consistent beliefs, expectations, and experiences across
two sites. Women & Health, 30, 67-82.
Treuth, M. S., Schmitz, K., Catellier, D. J., McMurray, R. G,
Murray, D. M., Almeida, M. J., . . . Pate, R. (2004). Defining
accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent
girls. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, 1259-1266.
Treuth, M. S., Sherwood, N. E., Butte, N. F., McClanahan, B.,
Obarzanek, E., Zhou, A., . . . Rochon, J. (2003). Validity and
reliability of activity measures in African-American girls for
GEMS. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, 532-539.
Troiano, R. P., Berrigan, D., Dodd, K. W., Masse, L. C., Tilert, T.,
& McDowell, M. (2008). Physical activity in the United States
measured by accelerometer. Medicine & Science in Sports &
Exercise, 40, 181-188.
Trost, S. G., McIver, K. L., & Pate, R. R. (2005). Conducting
accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based
research. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37,
S531-S543.
Trost, S. G., Ward, D. S., Moorehead, S. M., Watson, P. D., Riner,
W., & Burke, J. R. (1998). Validity of the computer science and
applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Medicine &
Science in Sports & Exercise, 30, 629-633.
Tudor-Locke, C. E., Lee, S. M., Morgan, C. F., Beighle, A., &
Pangrazi, R. P. (2006). Childrens pedometer-determined physical activity during the segmented school day. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38, 1732-1738.
USDHHS. (2008). Physical activity guidelines for Americans.
Washington, DC: Author.
van Dam, R. M., Willett, W. C., Manson, J. E., & Hu, F. B. (2006).
The relationship between overweight in adolescence and premature death in women. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145,
91-97.
van Sluijs, E., McMinn, A. M., & Griffin, S. J. (2007). Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children
and adolescents: Systematic review of controlled trials. British
Medical Journal (BMJ), 335, 703.
Wang, Y., Liang, H., Tussing, L., Braunschweig, C., Caballero, B.,
& Flay, B. (2007). Obesity and related risk factors among low
socio-economic status minority students in Chicago. Public
Health Nutrition, 10, 927-938.
Webber, L. S., Catellier, D., Lytle, L. A, Murray, D. M., Pratt, C. A.,
& Young, D. R., TAAG Collaborative Research Group. (2008).
Promoting physical activity in middle school girls: Trial of
Robbins et al.
315
Bios
Lorraine B. Robbins, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, is an associate professor
at Michigan State University College of Nursing, MI, USA.
Karin A. Pfeiffer, PhD, is an associate professor at Michigan State
University Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, MI,
USA.
Kimberly S. Maier, PhD, is an assistant professor and a statistician
at Michigan State University Measurement & Quantitative Methods Program, College of Education, MI, USA.
Yun-Jia Lo, PhDc, doctoral candidate at Michigan State University Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology & Special
Education, College of Education, MI, USA.
Stacey M. Wesolek (LaDrig), MS, is at Michigan State University
College of Nursing in Michigan.