Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Dr. Schmidt
CO 495: Capstone
3 December 2016
Women in Comedy Dispelling Traditional Female Traits
Abstract
An examination of three contemporary female stand up comedians, Chelsea Peretti, Ali
Wong, and Leslie Jones, that determines that their hour long specials tell jokes that subvert the
traditional feminine traits of passivity, sensitivity, weakness, quietness, innocence, domesticity, a
penchant to be nurturing, sexual submissiveness, acceptance, self-criticism, and gracefulness.
Introduction
In her special One of the Greats, comedian Chelsea Peretti wonders what its like to be
a man: My fantasy of what its like to be a guy is you wake up in the morning and open your
eyes and youre like IM AWESOME. PEOPLE PROBABLY WANT TO HEAR WHAT I HAVE
TO SAY. IM GOING TO DO SOMETHING GREAT TODAY. While she never may fulfill that
desire to know, she can speak to her own experiences, and as a stand up comedian she does that
on a nightly basis, as do her colleagues Ali Wong and Leslie Jones.
As female stand up comedians, these women have a lot on their plates: they have to
memorize entire jokes, make sure those jokes are well-written so that the audience is entertained,
deliver them in a way that will come across funny. They have to perform their jobs with some
things working against them: perhaps the acoustics in a venue are weird, or theyre sick or tired
due to all of the traveling. Such is the life of a comedian.
I found that these women managed to do all of the above in addition to tackling greater
issues from the larger world, especially gender stereotypes.
Literature Review
Topics Addressed in Womens Comedy
Several of the articles addressed the typical subjects touched upon by womens humor.
Andrea Greenbaum in Womens Comic Voices: The Art and Craft of Female Humor (1997)
writes that these subjects include relationships, emotions, politics as it relates to feminism, and
body image (p. 118). In the same article, Greenbaum claims that male humor is more
concerned with external issues of performance, current events, popular culture, and professional
achievement (p. 118).
Eileen Gillooly (1991) is more detailed in her summation of womens topics, which she
expands to include female economic and political disabilities; conflicts between a desire for
love/marriage and independence; the dangers of sentimentalizing romantic love; the tediumof
homemaking; the discrepancy between cultural constructions of ideal femininityand embodied
female experience (p. 484).
Humor as a Way of Bonding
These topics, while they might be explored in different ways, can offer a sort of
community to women, both between audience members and between the performer and her
audience. Humor is a very effective tool in bonding. As Lawrence E. Mintz (1986) explores in
The Journal of American Folklore, Humor is also stronglyvaluable for the student of culture
because itdeals with sorts of different topics, many of which aremore commonly dealt with
in covert, restricted, or restrained ways (p. 339). This willingness to address the taboo
experiences of women that might otherwise go unsaid creates a liberating, uniting place for
women. In a 2016 profile in The New Yorker featuring the work of actor/writer/comedian Ali
Wong, fellow comedian Amy Schumer praises Wong for being a revolutionary in comedy (p.
2). Perhaps this is because Wong, whose 2016 Netflix special featured her performing her set
while seven and a half months pregnant, is not afraid to address what may be the last taboo of
female sexuality: women are animals (p. 3).
Helga Kothoff (2000) writes in her first article that I will cite here, Gender and Joking:
On the Complexities of Womens Image Politics in Humorous Narratives that Girls were more
likely than the boys to talk with bemused reflection about their past behavior and personal
experiences. They used self-directed humor to facilitate discussions of personal experiences
(p. 58). She continues, feminists exhibit solidarity with their own gender in enjoying jokes, and
deconstruct patriarchal ideologies of gender orders in their humor (p. 59). Finally, Kotthoff
writes that women often use humor as a means of coming to terms with negative experiences
and if a woman jokingly told a story about a mishap or a negative experience, others would
respond with similar anecdotes, so that they were able to share their experiences and jointly
create distance through humor (p. 60).
In the second Kotthoff (2006) article that I will cite, Gender and Humor: the State of the
Art, Kotthoff references the studies of Kalcik (1975), Jenkins (1985), Painter (1980), and
Davies (1984) to show that womens humor produced intimacy and familiarity. Women joked
about shared experiences of disappointment, of having to deal with difficult people, and of
overcoming constraints in their life (p. 15). This was found to have a healing function in
addition to the general humorous appeal of the jokes (p. 15). In her review of contemporary
humor anthologies, Jaye Berman (1990) cites an essay by Wendy Wasserstein that emphasizes
the cathartic effects of humor and the way that laughing can release the pain of disappointment
and rejection (p. 258).
Maria Rhodora G. Ancheta (2013) also found this to be the case in studying a
contemporary comedian, Ellen DeGeneres. She found that DeGeneres has found a way to
convince women to laugh, not at, but for themselves [to] create female bondingthus
displacing the male from the center of knowledge (p. 82). To topple gender hierarchies, in
which the male is the center of knowledge, is a wonderfully subversive act.
I include this subject matter to underscore the point that if humor is bonding, then female
audiences will feel a relationship to the jokes being told. If the jokes are indeed a way of
subverting the idea of the typical feminine woman, then a greater audience is being educated
about a new way of thinking. In a sense, each stand up special has the potential to unite a
community around it and encourage people to reevaluate their own views on women, hopefully
in a way that will explain that women are multi-faceted beings who should not have to be
defined in certain, limited ways.
Comedy as Aggression
This is true in any realm, but especially stand-up comedy, which is notorious for being a
male-dominated field. Indeed, in her profile of comedian Sarah Silverman that appeared in The
New Yorker, Dana Goodyear (2005) wrote Comedy is probably the last remaining branch of the
arts whose suitability for women is still openly discussed (p. 1). Goodyear then goes on to
reference the controversial and misogynistic claims by the telethon host Jerry Lewis who told a
film festival audience that he couldnt think of a single funny female comedian (p. 1).
Opinions such as Lewiss, and later in that same article, magician Penn Jillettes (p. 1),
show that there are still such biases against women in this field of work. Many of the articles I
read claim that this is because comedy is such an aggressive act and for it to be performed by a
woman, for whatever reason, still is upsetting to biases, subconscious or not.
Andrea Greenbaum (1997) claims males find jokes funnier when females are the butt of
the joke (p. 120). Helga Kotthoff (2000) wrote that comedians and humorists are often socially
very influential (p. 57). In her 2006 article, Kotthoff cites the work of Coser (1960) to explain
that anyone who makes other people laugh has momentary control of the situation; she
continues, humor in formal contexts is linked to high situational status and can affirm ones
dominance in the hierarchal social structure (p. 8). An Evening at the Improv, a since cancelled
show that featured a mainly male contingency of stand-up comedians, aired on the channel A&E
in the 1990s, inspired the author M. Alison Kibler. In analyzing mens different sets, Kibler
(1999) writes Although these gender bits [jokes that specifically resort to gender stereotypes.
Jokes with formats such as my wife, etc.] may be part of stand-up comedians efforts to
address a mixed-sex crowd, they address women and discuss womens experiences mainly as a
means of bonding with men, against women (p. 48). The idea that women, when it is proven
that men, the traditional class in power, think its funnier when women are joked about, are
taking to the stage to tell their jokes, proves female comedians as powerful subversives.
Self-Deprecation as a Means of Power
This power is sometimes misinterpreted because of the format in which some female
comedians tend to tell their jokes. Danielle Russell (2002) cited Joan B. Levines 1976 study that
found that self-satire can be expected to be womens niche in comedy (p. 2). In Russells own
study, she found that self-deprecatory humour is neither restricted to, nor the staple of, female
comics. It is, however, more prevalent in their stand-up routine than in those of their male
counterparts (p. 2).
However, this act of self- deprecation is more complex than it seems. Russell writes that
Stand-up comedy is an aggressive act; to elicit laughter is to exert control, even power. To stand
on a stage and initiate humour in an attempt to evoke laughteris to reject the submissive,
passive role determined for women by North American social conventions (p. 3). Therefore, a
woman may make self-deprecating jokes, but the very act of her being there, microphone in
hand, is already showing her as a strong woman.
While Russells study shows that self-deprecation is prevalent in womens stand-up
comedy, it is by no means only a women thing. Lawrence Mintz (1985) makes note of the
negative exemplar as a staple of comedy dating back to medieval times, regardless of gender.
The grotesque, the buffoon, the fool, the simpleton, the scoundrel, the drunkard, the liar, the
cheatthe weakling, the neuroticare enacted by the comedian to belaughed at (p. 75).
Comedians use of self-deprecation can be used to enter into stereotypes, turn them
upside down, and use that twist to exploit it for laughs. Self-deprecation, then, should not be
necessarily taken as a sign of weakness; rather, it is a tool employed by the strong to create these
communities that are bound together.
Conclusion of the Literature Review
Given that stand-up comedy performed by women violates gender roles, can act as a
gender-unifying agent, and challenges power hierarchies, it is best put by Eileen Gillooly when
she says it is a socially acceptable form of protest (p. 483). In this light, I want to look at
contemporary female comedians such as Chelsea Peretti, Ali Wong, and Leslie Jones through the
lens of them as subversives of traditional femininity. My main focus will be their subject matters
and how their tone and delivery subvert stereotypes of women.
It is very important that these are contemporary comedians. There seems to be a trend in
which every few years there is an uproar that women arent funny! In response to this, society
seems to bolster a new face of female comedy and things quiet down until that woman does
something wrong or unfunny and then the whole process starts over again. There is still a bias
against women in comedy, but at this point it is probably the best that it has ever been, although
there are still ways to go.
Given the more recent rise in numbers of women getting stand up specials, most of the
older articles do not apply here. Some of them are from the 1980s and 1990s when their subjects
were more limited. With the addition of streaming services such as Netflix, which houses all
three of the specials that I examined, there is a greater pool to choose from and more evidence to
investigate.
There are a lot of available items about the history of women in comedy, from pioneers
such as Lucille Ball, Phyllis Diller, and Joan Rivers to more recent times. However, those are
largely chronological and do not always reference specific jokes and what those jokes mean, as I
tried to do in my study.
Methods
Critical Analysis
I believe the most effective method for completing this project is to do a critical analysis.
My research will be regarding females in stand-up comedy. My specific research question will
look at how contemporary female comedians use their stage and voice to subvert traditional traits
of femininity. As I wrote about in my literature review, stand-up comedy is a radical act,
especially when performed by a woman. Often times their jokes exploit standards for women in
society and use them as objects and points of ridicule.
There are many reasons for that stand up comedy is viewed as radical, ranging from a
subconscious adherence to gender norms to the physical act of standing alone performing before
people. While they might not necessarily be making controversial statements or enacting any
widespread social change, female stand-up comedians are still in the minority and their acts can
provide incisive views into society. I want to view three different stand-up specials and identify
ways that the different comedians either embrace or reject the feminine traits that are usually
expected of women.
The critical analysis is helpful in breaking down a work and going through piece by piece
to better understand what is being said, at both the literal text and the subtexts. Because it is
subjective writing, I think that it is the most appropriate for this subject matter since stand-up
comedy and humor in general is so subjective. I understand that there is a lot of room for
personal bias, but in looking at each piece critically and objectively as possible, I think that there
is a lot of interesting, important information to be mined.
Selection of Samples
The three stand-up specials that I am planning to review are Chelsea Perettis 2014
special One of the Greats, Ali Wongs 2016 special Baby Cobra, and Leslie Joness 2011
special Problem Child. Since all of the specials were recorded and released within the last five
years, I think that qualifies them to fit under the term contemporary. I chose these three
because of the more obvious reason that they are all women comedians. However, all three
women also have experience and work or have worked as writers, actors, and comedians.
Peretti wrote for NBCs Parks and Recreation and Comedy Centrals The Sarah
Silverman Program. She is currently an actress perhaps most famous for her role as Gina Linetti
on FOXs Brooklyn 99. Wong writes for ABCs Fresh Off the Boat and also acted in the film
Savages as well as in the NBC show Are You There, Chelsea? Leslie Jones was a writer for
NBCs Saturday Night Live before being hired as one of the players on the show. She also had a
starring turn in this past summers all-female reboot of Ghostbusters.
All of the women also fall in a similar age range when you consider their age at the time
their specials were recorded: Wong is 34, Peretti was 36, and Jones was 44. It will be interesting
and perhaps helpful if there is some overlap between the topics that they cover and the tone in
which they deliver their jokes.
I also selected these three women for the purpose of diversity. Peretti is Caucasian, Wong
is Asian, and Jones is African American. I think that their ethnic backgrounds might inform
different perspectives and therefore all of the women will have different takes and different ways
to skewer society. There is definitely a bias against women in the comedy world (going off of
sheer numbers of available-to-stream stand-up specials that are performed by women alone), but
one could argue that there is an even stronger bias against women of color. I wanted to include a
diversity component because I think that it is important to have different worldviews and it will
add to the discussion of the different experiences that they have had.
I think that the sample of Peretti, Wong, and Jones is appropriate, although one problem
is that it does not necessarily mean that these three speak for all comedians, specifically all
female comedians. Stand up comedy is such a broad field with so many different people and
personalities at work that I do not know that anyone can really be lumped together and said to be
indicative of the whole group. However, these are arguably some of the biggest female names in
comedy today. I think that their successes are rooted in their popularity, and if people are tuning
in or buying tickets for their shows, there must be something that theyre saying that resonates
with audiences. For this reason, I think that their viewpoints and takes on femininity must be
taken seriously and are worthy of further inspection.
Coding Sheet
A coding sheet will be used to define the trait being inspected and a yes or no response to
whether or not that trait was subverted. If it was indeed subverted, then the joke that falls under
that category will be sampled. Also included in the coding sheet is a column for how the joke
was delivered, so that the reader will have as vivid a picture as possible. It feels necessary to
emphasize that if a trait is subverted and a sample joke is included, that joke may be one of many
that made that point. I picked the most relevant of the jokes to make my points.
I also made notes of the comedians physical appearance. I did this because at some points
they referenced their clothes or bodies in their acts, so it felt like relevant information to relate.
Also, how they present themselves can also act as another way that they are either conforming or
choosing not to conform to what society might expect of them as women: pretty and welldressed.
Definitions
I think that it is important to define a few key terms that will be relevant to my research. I
plan on defining femininity by combining answers from a few different dictionaries and gender
identity websites: femininity is having qualities traditionally ascribed to women, such as
gentleness. More qualities ascribed to women include emotional, passive, sensitive, quiet,
graceful, innocent, weak, flirtatious, nurturing, self-critical, soft, sexually submissive, and
accepting. The typically feminine traits that I chose to highlight within these acts are passivity,
sensitivity, quietness, gracefulness, innocence, weakness, domesticity, nurturing, self-criticism,
sexual submissiveness, and acceptance.
Some of these traits have a bit of overlap: passivity and quietness could be synonyms, but
I looked at them in different ways. I defined passivity as the idea of sitting by. A passive female
is a sort of damsel in distress scenario. Quietness, on the other hand, I defined as someone who
does not want to share their opinion, or, more literally, make any noise. In terms of sensitivity, I
looked at the topic of the joke. In the context of stand-up comedy, I would define sensitivity as
avoiding talking about any topics that might be deemed too offensive or off color.
Gracefulness is the idea that a personin this case, a womanwill conduct herself with poise
and elegance. I looked for jokes that put the comedian in a light that was not necessarily
ladylike. To judge innocence, or lack thereof, in these comedians, I looked for jokes that
addressed a taboo subject, like sex or drugs, that point to a worldview of someone who is not
nave. Weakness was taken in a literal definition, as someone who is not strong either physically
or mentally. To look for a subversion of weakness, I looked for jokes that involved the female
comedian being in a position of power. Domesticity is the realm that women are usually
relegated to. I think that domesticity is providing for the care and keeping of the home. The
motive for this may vary, but one version of the stereotype is that the woman is running the
cooking and cleaning aspect of the home out of the goodness of her heart and out of love for her
family. Nurturing relates to the care of the children. Women are usually the main caretakers of
children. Self-criticism is a trait that is attributed to women in the sense that there is a stereotype
of them diminishing themselves, perhaps to seem more approachable or modest, other traits that
are admired in an ideal woman. In judging whether a comedian subverted this trait, I looked
for statements or jokes that underscored their capabilities and strengths as opposed to
downplaying or criticizing them. Sexual submissiveness is the idea that a woman does not pursue
sex, but rather waits for the man to take charge in initiate and then pursuing sex. Finally, I
defined acceptance as a general embracing of societys standards and norms. To look for how a
comedian subverted that idea, I looked for jokes that pointed out hypocrisies and stereotypes.
Evaluations
It will be important to identify the comedians theses and purposes. Obviously
entertainment is at the forefront, as is the want to make the audience laugh, but I will examine
further to see if there is some sort of underlying message or mission statement, which will be
evident upon examining their subject matter.
A large part of comedy is encouraging audiences to see the world is a different way, so
that will play a big role in the all-encompassing takeaway from the special: did they challenge or
change the way that you view something or someone? In this case, it would be a matter of
whether or not they changed or challenged traditional femininity.
In watching (and I am planning on multiple viewings of each of these performances), I
want to analyze the topics that are talked about. Is there a specific kind of joke, i.e. about
relationships, that all of the comedians employ? Within the different topics discussed, I want to
break it down into how those jokes were told: were there messages conveyed through anecdotes,
through sarcasm, through an interaction with an audience member in crowd work?
I think that the delivery can be just as much a part of the protest as the language: for
example, if the comedian was heckled during a performance and responds quickly and sharply,
eviscerating and effectively silencing their attacker, then that would go against the feminine
qualities of passivity and gentleness.
The comedians use of language is also important. In accordance with the adjectives used
above, a feminine woman would probably not use foul language. If foul language is used, is it
used on purpose to make a point (like a subversive use of the word bitch, for example), or is it
just a comedians way of speaking and used like any other word.
Coding Sheets
Comedian: Chelsea Peretti
Physical appearance: Peretti wears jeans, a nice shirt, and boots. Her hair is softly curled
and her makeup is minimal.
Feminine Trait
Was that Example Joke
(If yes) Tone or Style
trait
of Delivery (i.e.
subverte
sarcasm or an
d by this
anecdote)
comedian
Passive
Yes
Sometimes I look at you [the
Hyperbole,
audience] and Im so jealous of exaggeration of
you just totally relaxed, watching
confidence
a genius
Sensitive
Yes
[on the Jodi Arias trial] Shes a
Hyperbole, sarcasm,
woman and murder is a mans
subverting stereotypes
game so she kind of broke a glass
ceiling I dont know, feminism
is so complicated. She stabbed her
ex, slit his throat, shot him, like
pick a thing! Shes like all girls: I
cant decide! I want all the
desserts!
Quiet
Yes
I like to adopt my stand-up stance Observational comedy
[spreads legs shoulder-width apart with a playful tone
with one hand on hip] it says:
Uh-oh. Looks like this one is
going to be telling it like it is.
Graceful
Yes
I have to tell the flight attendant
Anecdote to in which
[that I just threw up in the pouch
a typical feminine
of the seat in front of meHey
role has to respond to
girl! There is a pile of vomit
the comedians
with my DNA in it and your name uncouth and therefore
written all over it! Then I spit in
generally
the sink and shes like Why
unacceptable ways
would you do that? And Im like
Im sorry, Im disoriented, if you
could just have some
compassion. She responds, If
you only knewIm one of the
most compassionate people. I
was likewhen do you bust that
out? Would love to interact with
that.
Innocent
Yes
Female pigs orgasms last 30
Quip that insults
minutesask your mom!
Weak
Yes
A good party trick: have someone Starts out like a fun
Domestic
Yes
Nurturing
Yes
Self-critical
Yes
Sexually submissive
Yes
Accepting
Yes
instructional before
quickly veering into a
plot twist
Sarcasm
Comparison to make a
point about herself
Direct statement
Subversion of what
you would expect: she
desexualizes it by
breaking pieces off
but makes it sexual
again by simulating
oral sex
Domestic
Yes
Nurturing
No
Self-critical
Yes
Sexually submissive
Yes
Accepting
Yes
subversion of damsel
in distress stereotype
Un-romanticizing
married life
Im a greatcatch! Im fine...Im
a top shelf bitch Im not saying
I aint pretty, it just took a long
time to get to pretty.
I dont care about relationships.
Im getting older and Im going to
die so I just want to get fucked
good because thats what the rest
of my days are for.
Cant drink Fanta because Im
scared one of these bitches are
going to show up. Why are they
always making the grape bitch
black? I like red too
Confident, matter-offact
N/A
Subversion of
stereotype of women
as sexually
submissive
Pointing out
stereotypes in the
media
Yes
Quiet
Yes
Graceful
Yes
Innocent
Yes
Weak
Yes
Domestic
Yes.
An exploitation of the
loving housewife
stereotype by having
a twist
Nurturing
Yes
Sarcasm
Self-critical
No
Sexually submissive
Yes
A direct statement
N/A
Accepting
Yes
Results
An overarching statement about these stand-up specials is that they were all able to
significantly undermine feminine traits and stereotypes. I was surprised at how directly they
tackled these subjects, albeit each in her own way. A few key themes stood out to me: similar
topics that were addressed, physical appearance, and the overall thoroughness with which these
women throttled those feminine traits.
Similar Topics Addressed
Peretti and Wong both had sizeable jokes about housewives. Perettis bit, as noted above,
has a scathing tone toward women who stay at home. She implies that it is undignified to stay at
home, and that in the general movement of women entering the workforce women evolved.
Wong, meanwhile, has the opposite approach. She is envious of housewives. A running
bit throughout her show is that she was so excited that her husband went to Harvard Business
School, because it meant that she could stay at home while he worked. A joke that exemplifies
this includes Wong referencing Lean In, a book that encourages women to be active in the
workforce, written by Sheryl Sandberg, COO of Facebook. Wong, in her take on the book, pleads
I dont want to lean in, I want to lie down!
Wong continues that feminism is the worst thing to happen to women because there
was a point when their jobwas no job. She laments We could have done the smart thing,
which would have been continuing to play dumb for the next century. Then these women had to
show off and tell them we can do anything! DONT RUIN IT FOR US! Now were expected
to workyou dont think we had a lot of options when our days were free, unscheduled, and
sponsoredmy friends get judgmental about housewives. Im like, that bitch is a genius. Shes
not a housewife, shes retired.
In condemning feminism, it seems that Wong is playing into the stereotype of woman as
accepting and submissive. However, in emphasizing that women were not incapable but rather
scheming for the opportunity to stay home and do nothing Wong flips it on its head. The women
were not inadequate, just, by Wongs determination, smart.
Of course, Wongs whole fantasy of being a housewife comes crashing down at the end of
the special, when she reveals that her Harvard-educated husband was $70,000 in debt. Wong
used her salary from TV writing to bail him out of that debt. After bragging throughout her
special that she had trapped her husband for the financial opportunities he would provide, she
pulls out the real stunner: that actually he trapped her. She ends her special with that joke,
boasting that that If I dont work, we die.
Despite their polarized views on housewives, Wong and Peretti both use stay-at-home
women to overturn stereotypes. Peretti does it in a blatant way, painting herself as a woman who
would never want that. Wong does the opposite, casting herself as a housewife in her wildest
dreams. However, despite her wishes, Wong remains the breadwinner for her family. Even in
trying to fulfill a stereotype, she still ends up subverting it anyways.
Physical Appearance
Chelsea Peretti probably wore the outfit most befitting of the typical woman. Leslie
Jones, meanwhile, was probably the most masculine. Her gray fitted vest and matching pants
were more evocative of what men would traditionally wear. Perhaps because of this and her
sweating, which she makes no effort to hide, Joness physical appearance probably did the most
in terms of going against one would expect.
Ali Wong, though, also shirked expectations of a woman, especially for a pregnant
woman. There seems to be an emphasis for pregnant woman to hide their growing stomachs:
many items of maternity wear boast of skimming over bumps and nearly rendering them
invisible. Wongs form-fitting dress did the opposite of this and emphasized it. Her pregnancy,
one of the ultimate hallmarks of being a woman, was addressed onstage and immediately.
Wong addresses her pregnancy in the context of her job in the joke included on her
coding sheet. Her physical looks were a constant reminder of her womanhood, even while she
discloses that she is a filthy animal. The juxtaposition of impending motherhood with the foul
language she used was definitely not in line with societys expectations for a woman.
Toppling of Stereotypes
Even by looking at all of the yeses filled in on the coding sheet, it is obvious that
these women shattered societal expectations. All of them made some sort of reference to her own
power and strength. It is worth noting that even the titles of their specials: One of the Greats,
Problem Child, and Baby Cobra are already phrases that you would not associate with a
typically feminine woman. They address feminine traits of self-criticism, innocence, and
weakness, respectively.
References
Ancheta, M. R. (2013). American Standup Comedy by Women and the Discourse of Cultural
Negotiation in American Life. Review of Women's Studies, 21(1), 74-89. Retrieved
September 23, 2016.
Berman, J. (1990, Summer). Review: Women's Humor. Contemporary Literature, 31(2), 251260. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
Gillooly, E. (1991, Autumn). Review: Women and Humor. Feminist Studies, 17(3), 473-492.
Retrieved September 23, 2016.
Goodyear, D. (2005). Quiet Depravity. Retrieved September 23, 2016, from
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2005/10/24/quiet-depravity
Greenbaum, A. (1997, Spring). Women's Comic Voices: The Art and Craft of Female Humor.
American Studies, 38(1), 117-138. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
Jones, L. (Writer). (n.d.). Problem Child. Live performance in Hollywood.
Kibler, M. A. (1999). Gender Conflict and Coercion on A & E's An Evening at the Improv. The
Journal of Popular Culture, 32(4), 45-57. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3840.1999.00045.x
Kotthoff, H. (2000). Gender and joking: On the complexities of women's image politics in
humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(1), 55-80. doi:10.1016/s03782166(99)00031-4
Kotthoff, H. (2006). Gender and humor: The state of the art. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(1), 4-25.
doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003
Levy, A. (2016, September 26). Ali Wongs Radical Raunch. Retrieved September 26, 2016,
from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/03/ali-wongs-radical-raunch
Mintz, L. E. (1985). Standup Comedy as Social and Cultural Mediation. American Quarterly,
37(1), 71-80. doi:10.2307/2712763
Mintz, L. E. (1986, September). Review. The Journal of American Folklore, 99(393), 339-341.
Retrieved September 23, 2016.
Peretti, C. (Writer). (2016, November 22). One of the Greats. Live performance in San
Francisco.
Russell, D. (2002, November). Self-Deprecatory Humour and the Female Comic: SelfDestruction or Comedic Construction? Third Space: A Journal of Feminist Theory
& Culture, 2(1), 1-19. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
Wong, A. (Writer). (2016, November 22). Ali Wong: Baby Cobra. Live performance in Seattle.