Está en la página 1de 4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

#247

SurveyMonkey

COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:43:19 PM
Last Modified: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:18:13 PM
Time Spent: 00:34:54
IP Address: 216.54.92.22

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name

Elisabeth Moore

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area

Elementary Education, PreK-6

Q3: Grade Taught

Kindergarten

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

10/24/2016

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

12/09/2016

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement

Greenbriar Primary School

Q7: School Division

Chesapeake Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Cheryl A. Gould

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address:
cheryl.gould42@gmail.com
Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role

University Supervisor

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for?

Mid-Term

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject
area(s) taught.

Superior

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the


age group.

Superior

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students


use of higher level thinking skills.

Superior

Links content with other subject areas and real world


applications.

Superior

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Elisabeth consistently meets the standards for professional knowledge. Her lesson content is accurate and ageappropriate.

1/4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

SurveyMonkey

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and
student learning needs.

Superior

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner


needs; adapts plans as needed.

Superior

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and


transitions.

Superior

Plans for differentiated instruction.

Superior

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
Elisabeth plans are well-written, aligned with the Virginia Standards of Learning, and provide students with interactive
lessons. The young learners were actively engaged in learning throughout the lessons I have observed.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning.

Proficient

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs.

Superior

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons.

Superior

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and


resources.

Superior

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning.

Proficient

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Elisabeth provides a positive learning environment. She integrated kinesthetic learning during whole group instruction a very important type of learning for kindergarten students. She provided differentiation of instruction through leveled
learning centers.The use of technology was not observed at this placement yet.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions.

Proficient

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and


instruments

Proficient

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative


purposes.

Proficient

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback.

Superior

2/4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

SurveyMonkey

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
I have primarily observed informal assessment strategies during instruction. I would like to see evidence of how
Elisabeth is documenting student progress and how she is using that data to make instructional decisions.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Superior

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to


prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Proficient

Respects students diversity, including language, culture,


race, gender, and special needs.

Superior

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and


responses.

Proficient

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
Elisabeth demonstrated positive interactions with students. She is exudes energy and enthusiasm. She contitues to
identify and try out different strategies for holding the attention of the young learners.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional
critiques.

Superior

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and


professional interactions.

Superior

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration


with teachers and other school personnel.

Superior

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and


ethical interactions.

Superior

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.
Elisabeth has maintained a positive and professional attitude throughout her student teaching placement.

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

3/4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

SurveyMonkey

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the
placement.

Proficient

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met.

Proficient

Uses available data to document/communicate student


progress and develop learning targets.

Proficient

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Elisabeth should provide me with evidence of student growth during this placement for me to provide a higher rating.

4/4

También podría gustarte