Está en la página 1de 4

West Lothian Council

Structure Name

Approval in Principle
(Design)

Operational Services

Grid Reference

Project Name
Structure Name

To be agreed with WLC

Structure Reference No
1.
Highway Details

To be completed by WLC

1.1

Type of highway

1.2

Permitted traffic speed

1.3

Existing restrictions

2.

Site Details

2.1

Obstacle crossed

3.

Proposed Structure

3.1

Description of structure and working life

3.2

Structural type

3.3

Foundation type

3.4

Span arrangements

3.5

Articulation arrangements

3.6

Proposed Classes/Levels
3.6.1
3.6.2
3.6.3

Consequence class
Reliability class
Inspection level

3.7

Road restraint system type

3.8

Proposed arrangements for future
maintenance and inspection
3.8.1
Traffic management
3.8.2
Access

3.9

Sustainability issues considered. Materials
and finishes

3.10

Risks and hazards considered for design,
construction, maintenance and demolition.
Consultation with and/or agreement from
CDM Co-ordinator

3.11

Working life and estimated cost of proposed
structure, together with other structural forms
considered (including where appropriate
proprietary manufactured structure), and the
reasons for their rejection (including
comparative whole life costs with dates of
estimates)

Approval in Principle
(December 2010)

Page 1 of 4

Name of firm preparing AIP

12 Grid Reference Proposed arrangements for construction 3.5 4.8 List of record of options and choices (for Category 2 or 3 checks) Approval in Principle (December 2010) and any special Page 2 of 4 Name of firm preparing AIP .1.3 Minimum headroom provided (including allowance for vertical sag compensation and maximum deflection of structure) 4.10 Permanent actions Snow.7 4.1. Design Criteria 4.5 4. including any provision for future heavier loads or future widening 4.2 3.12.West Lothian Council Structure Name Approval in Principle (Design) Operational Services 3.2 4.2 Heavy or high load route requirements and arrangements being made to preserve the route.7 Proposed methods for dealing with aspects not covered by Standards and documents in 4.1.1 4.1 Actions: 4.5.4 Authorities consulted conditions required 4.5 Standards and documents: 4.12.5 4.1.9 4.3 4.6 4.6 Proposed departures from Standards given in 4.1. wind and thermal actions Persistent actions relating to normal traffic under AW regulations and C&U regulations Persistent actions relating to General Order Traffic under STGO regulations Footway of footbridge persistent actions Persistent actions relating to Special Order Traffic.1.5.8 4.3 Traffic management Service diversions Interface with existing structures 4.1.12.4 4.1 3.1.2 Additional relevant Standards and publications 4.1.1. provision for exceptional abnormal indivisible loads including location of vehicle track on deck cross-section Accidental actions Actions during execution Special rules for combination of actions Any special actions not covered above 4.1 List of relevant documents from the TAS: 4.

state when the results are expected and list the sources of information used to justify the preliminary choice of foundations 7.2 List of record of options and choices (for Category 2 or 3 only) Approval in Principle (December 2010) Page 3 of 4 Grid Reference Name of firm preparing AIP . name of proposed Independent Checker 7. Checking 7.2 Geotechnical Design Report Summary Information 6. Drawings and Documents 8.1 Methods of analysis proposed for superstructure.4 If the Geotechnical Design Report is not yet available. substructure and foundations 5. Geotechnical Conditions 6. Structural Analysis 5.3 Differential settlement to be allowed for in the design of the structure 6.1 Proposed Category of checking and Design Supervision level 7.1 List of drawings (including numbers) and documents accompanying the submission 8.2 Description and diagram of idealised structure to be used for analysis 5.2 If category 3.3 Erection proposals or temporary works for which an independent check will be required.3 Assumptions intended for calculation of structural element stiffness 5.1 Acceptance of recommendations of section 8 of the Geotechnical Design Report to be used in the design and reasons for any proposed changes 6.4 Proposed range of soil parameters to be used in the design of earth retaining elements 6.West Lothian Council Operational Services Structure Name Approval in Principle (Design) 5. listing parts of the structure affected with reasons for recommending an independent check 8.

Name of Organisation: ...………………..…………………………………….…………………………… Date: ……………………………………………………………………… The above is agreed subject to the amendments and conditions shown below Signed: ……………………………………………………………………. 10.. Name: G Muir Senior Engineer Transportation . Design Team Leader Engineering Qualifications: . Structure Name Approval in Principle (Design) Grid Reference The above is submitted for acceptance Signed: …………………………………………………….. Name: …………………………………………………………………….West Lothian Council Operational Services 9.Structures Engineering Qualifications: BSc CEng MICE Technical Approval Authority: West Lothian Council Date: ………………….…………………………….……………………………………….………………………………………………… Approval in Principle (December 2010) Page 4 of 4 Name of firm preparing AIP .