Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
REFERENCE DOCUMENT:
- ASME B31.3.
- CAESAE II User Guide.
- Piping Stress Engineering- L.C. Peng.
- Theory of Plasticity- J.Chakrabarty
S b 2S t
2
What happened when Maximum Stress Intensity of Octahedral Shearing Stress large
than Yielding Strength?
To answer the question, we start from what is Maximum Stress Intensity or Octahedral Shearing
Stress.
In Piping Stress Engineering-L.C Peng give a definition: defining stress intensity as twice the
maximum shear stress.
Where:
Sx: Longitudinal stress resulting mainly from bending moments and internal pressure.
Sy: Hoop stress mainly from internal pressure.
xy: Torsion stress mainly due to the torsion moment.
S1,S2: Principle stress( consider pipe stress in two-dimension stress)
CAESAR II reports the largest stress using four calculation points through the pipe cross section, as
show in the following figure.
Longitudinal stress (Sl), hoop stress (Sh), radial stress (Sr) and shear stress (St) are calculated at
each position using the appropriate formulas.
These stresses are translated into principal stresses S1,S2,S3 by using Morhs Circle:
S.I. = S1-S3
(CAESAR II reports the largest of these four values.)
When follow a failure theory (here we follow max. shear stress intensity) what is behavior of piping
system when the value large than Yielding strength.
CAESAR II software use calculate stress and displacement base on elastic field. Therefore the stress
value can be large than Yielding strength (detail can refer to Para. 3.3- Piping Stress Engineer-L.C.
Peng). When the stress is large than Yielding strength, it means plastic deform already appear in
our system.
Imagine it heated or cooled to the same temperature time and time again.
The stresses will never increase over the maximum from the first heat up so
long as the maximum temperature of the first heat up is never exceeded. If the
strains in the L bends elbow exceed the yield stress of the metal (as is
permissible by the B31 codes) the small area of highest stress that exceeds
the yield strength of the metal in the elbow yields or deforms. This
deformation then redistributes the internal strain energy to a larger surface
and hence the peak stress value decreases as shown in the hypothetical graph
in the figure above. This cycle of load application, material yielding, and strain
redistribution will occur repeatedly during the first few cycles. After the strain
has been fully redistributed the system will have been shaken out. This
entire phenomenon is often described as a strain controlled phenomena. After
full shakeout occurs all subsequent cycles will behave in an elastic manner.COADE Mechanical Engineering News-Jan, 2001.
This is the reason why when Max. Stress Intensity large than Yielding strength
our system is still operating under elastic manner.
One example from KNPC project-C-141-1360-0213-R04
Max. Stress Intensity at node 2180(on branch element) large than Yielding
strength (478750.8>241311) plastic deformation is appeared at this node
(on branch element).
Conclusion:
From code stress, we know only our system can run safe under thermal fatigue.
But we dont know the system have plastic deform or not.
From Max. Stress Intensity or Octahedral Shearing Stress, we can know our
system have plastic deform or not. But after some cycle of operating, the stress
reduces into elastic range. Its very importance thing in piping stress analysis.
Problem:
Why in sustained case, code stress evaluation don't include hoop
stress. The stress included only longitudinal and torsion stress.
Whats happened if we find out a case in which Max. Stress Intensity
in sustained case is large than Yielding Strength (or this case never
existing). Can the actual stress (not calculated stress in CAESAR II) be
over ultimate strength (Su)? And our system can be collapsed by
thermal stress?
Can we control plastic deformation in design stage? Whats happened
if the deformation is too large (if existing)?