Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
372
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
G.R.No.126115.January26,2000.
PEOPLEOFTHEPHILIPPINES,plaintiffappellee,vs.ALFONSO
BALGOS,AliasLupog,accusedappellant.
Criminal Law Rape Witnesses The trial courts evaluation of the
testimonies of witnesses is given great respect by the appellate court in the
absence of proof that it was arrived at capriciously or that the trial court
disregarded material facts which might affect the outcome of the case.
Prefatorily,wenotethewellestablishedrulethatthetrialcourtsevaluation
of the testimonies of witnesses is given great respect by the appellate court
in the absence of proof that it was arrived at capriciously or that the trial
courtdisregardedmaterialfactswhichmightaffecttheoutcomeofthecase.
Therationalebehindthisruleisthatthecredibilityofawitnesscanbestbe
determined by the trial court since it has the opportunity to observe the
candoranddemeanorofthewitnesses.Inthepresentcase,thetrialcourtis
correctingivingcredencetoCrissellestestimonyoverthatoftheaccused
appellant.Crissellestestimonywassimple,conciseandcohesive.
SameSameSameIthasbeenstressedoftenenoughthatthetestimony
of rape victims who are young and immature deserve full credence.If
Crisselles story was the product of her imagination, as the accused
appellant would like this Court to believe, she would have painted for the
court a more dastardly and gruesome picture of her ordeal. But true to her
innocence and coyness, being only six years old, the words she used on
crossexaminationweremild.Shementionedthathispenisdidnotpenetrate
her vagina but that it only touched its hole,that the attempt of the
accusedappellant to satisfy his lust for flesh was only for a short period,
thatnothinghappenedtohervaginaaftertheaccusedappellanttriedtoinsert
hispeniswithaninandoutmotion,andthatshedidnotactuallyseethe
penisoftheaccusedappellantenterhervagina.Thesearetelltalesignsatthe
victimshonestyandcandorinrelatingherunsavoryexperienceatthehands
ofaccusedappellant.Ithasbeenstressedoftenenoughthatthetestimonyof
rapevictimswhoareyoungandimmaturedeservefullcredence.
________________
*ENBANC.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
1/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
373
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
373
Peoplevs.Balgos
SameSameThemereintroductionofthepenisintotheapertureofthe
female organ, thereby touching the labia of the pudendum, already
consummates the crime of rape.In any case, even if his organ merely
touchedtheholeofCristsellesvagina,thisalreadyconstitutesrapesince
thecompletepenetrationofthepenisintothefemaleorganisnotnecessary.
The mere introduction of the penis into the aperture of the female organ,
therebytouchingthelabiaofthepudendum,alreadyconsummatesthecrime
of rape. Since the labia is the outer lip of the genital organ, accused
appellants act of repeatedly placing his organ in the hole of Crisselles
vaginawasrape.
Same Same Pleadings and Practice An accuseds shift in theory,
uponrealizingthefutilityofhisearlierdefense,ratherthanhelphiscause,
onlyfurtherdamageshiscredibility.TheCourtisnotpersuaded.Accused
appellants new defense of alibi is the weakest of all defenses. It cannot
prevailoverhispositiveidentificationbythevictimwhosetestimonyonthe
events that happened on that illfated day was direct and convincing.
Moreover, his shift of theory, upon realizing the futility of his earlier
defense,ratherthanhelphiscause,onlyfurtherdamagedhiscredibility.
SameSameQualifiedRapeThe penalty of death shall be imposed if
thecrimeofrapeiscommittedagainstachildbelowseven(7)yearsofage.
Thetrialcourtiscorrectinimposingthesupremepenaltyofdeathonthe
accusedappellant.UnderArticle335oftheRevisedPenalCodeasamended
by Section 11 of Republic Act No. 7659, the penalty of death shall be
imposed if the crime of rape is committed against a child below seven (7)
yearsofage.Inthepresentcase,thereisnodisputethatthevictimwassix
(6)yearsofagewhentheaccusedappellanthadcarnalknowledgewithher.
The victims age was duly established by the prosecution, through the
testimonyofthevictimsmother,CriseldaFuentes,andfurthercorroborated
byCrissellesCertificateofLiveBirth.
SameSameSameDamagesIf the commission of rape is effectively
qualifiedbyanyofthecircumstancesunderwhichthepenaltyofdeathmay
beimposed,thecivilindemnityforthevictimshallnotbelessthanSeventy
FiveThousandPesos(P75,000.00).Withrespecttotheawardofdamages,
wehaverecentlyheldthatifthecommissionofrapeiseffectivelyqualified
by any of the circumstances under which the penalty of death may be
imposed,thecivil
374
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
2/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
374
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
indemnityforthevictimshallnotbelessthanSeventyFiveThousandPesos
(P75,000.00). Based on the foregoing judicial prescription, the trial courts
award of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity should be
increased to SeventyFive Thousand Pesos (P75,000.00). Moreover, the
victim is entitled to moral damages under Article 2219 of the Civil Code,
withoutthenecessityforpleadingorproofofthebasisthereof.Inlinewith
current jurisprudence, accused appellants victim is entitled to moral
damagesintheamountofFiftyThousandPesos(P50,000.00).
AUTOMATICREVIEWofadecisionoftheRegionalTrialCourtof
RoxasCity,Br.15.
ThefactsarestatedintheopinionoftheCourt.
TheSolicitorGeneralforplaintiffappellee.
AlbertI.Potatoforaccusedappellant.
Benjamin R. Perez collaborating counsel for accused
appellant.
PERCURIAM:
InacriminalComplaint,dated9November1995,AlfonsoBalgos,
alias Lupog, was accused by Crisselle Ilanga 1Fuentes, a six (6)
yearoldchild,ofthecrimeofrape.Thecomplaint reads:
The undersigned complainant accuses ALFONSO BALGOS, alias
LUPOG,aresidentofBrgy.Libas,RoxasCity,Philippines,ofthecrime
of RAPE, defined and penalized under Article 335, par. 3 of the Revised
PenalCode,asamendedbyRepublicActNo.7659,committedasfollows:
That on October 8, 1995 at about 2:00 oclock in the afternoon, in the
City of Roxas, Philippines, and within the Jurisdiction (sic) of this
Honorable Court, the abovenamed accused, did then and there willfully,
unlawfullyandfeloniouslyhad(sic)carnalknowledgewiththeundersigned
whoissix(6)yearsold,tothedamageandpreju
________________
1Rollo,p.5.
375
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
375
Peoplevs.Balgos
diceofthecomplainantinsuchamountasmaybeawardedtoherunderthe
NewCivilCodeofthePhilippines.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
3/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
CONTRARYTOLAW.
376
376
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
4/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
Crisselle with a blanket and had her put on her underwear. When
MichelleandWadayenteredthehouse,Crissellewasstillcovered
withablanket.
Crisselledidnottellanybodyabouttheincident.However,on12
October1995,CrisartFuentes,theolderbrotherofCrisselle,toldhis
mother, Criselda Fuentes, that Michelle and Waday had11 informed
him that Crisselle was raped by the accusedappellant. Criselda
thenaskedCrisarttocallMichelleandWadaytoconfirmhisstory.
Upon being asked if Crisselle was raped by the accusedappellant,
12
Michelle and Waday answered in the affirmative. Thereupon,13
Criseldainformedherhusband,ArturoFuentes,abouttheincident.
ThespousesFuentesaskedCrisselleifthestorywastrue.Crisselle
14
criedandconfirmedthatshewasrapedbytheaccusedappellant.
Thereafter,CrisselleandherparentswenttotheirBarangayCaptain,
15
Loreto Arawaraw, to report the incident. The Barangay Captain,
togetherwithtwoofhistanods,pickeduptheaccusedappellantand
brought him to the Barangay Hall for questioning. Asked if he
indeed raped
Crisselle, the accusedappellant denied the
16
accusation. The Barangay Captain then asked Crisselle about the
incident.Crissellerecountedherharrowingexperienceatthehands
of
________________
8Id.,at1819.
9Id.,at12.
10Id.
11TSN,5March1996,p.6.
12Id.,at67.
13Id.,at7.
14Id.
15TSN,6March1996,p.6.
16Id.
377
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
377
Peoplevs.Balgos
17
5/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
PhysicalExamination:Nobruises,hematomanoted
I.E.VaginaIntroitusadmitoneindexfingerwithease
Hymen + 0.2 CM. Lacerated wound at 3 oclock position () bleeding
noted
DischargesNegative
20
SpermatozoaDeterminationNegative
378
378
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
25
were also inside the house and listening to the radio. He also
admittedthathecoveredCrissellewithablanket,butclaimedthatit
was not only Crisselle who was under the blanket but also himself
andhistwo(2)nieces,MichelleandWaday.
InitsDecision,dated19July1996,thetrialcourtbelievedwhat
it described as the straightforward, clear and convincing open
court declarations of Crisselle as
against the uncorroborated
26
testimonyoftheaccusedappellant. Itdebunkedthedefenseofthe
accusedappellant that he merely inserted his finger inside the
vaginaofCrisselle,sayingthatthiswasmerelyalastditcheffortto
27
savehimselffromcriminalresponsibility. Thetrialcourtalsonoted
four circumstances that pointed towards the criminal culpability of
the accusedappellant. First, his admission that he asked Michelle
andWadaytobuyfoodandleavethehouseshowedhisintentionto
28
createanopportunitytocommithisbeastlyactagainstCrisselle.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
6/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
28
createanopportunitytocommithisbeastlyactagainstCrisselle.
Second, his disposition to play with young girls revealed his
libidinal predilection
which he wanted gratified even on young
29
girls like Crisselle. Third, his admission30that he was sexually
aroused exposed his lustful desire for flesh. Fourth, his failure to
show that Crisselle was motivated by illwill in fabricating
her
31
accusationlentcredencetothetestimonyofhisvictim. Inthelight
oftheseobservations,thetrialcourtconvictedtheaccusedappellant
of the crime of rape and imposed the supreme penalty of death, to
wit:
WHEREFORE, finding accused Alfonso Balgos alias Lupog guilty
beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of rape defined and punished under
Art. 335 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by RA 7659, judgment is
hereby rendered imposing upon him the supreme penalty of death. He is
likewise,orderedtoindemnifyprivate
________________
25Id.,at56.
26Decision,Records,p.107.
27Id.,at112.
28Id.
29Id.,at112113.
30Id.,at113.
31Id.
379
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
379
Peoplevs.Balgos
complainant
Crisselle Fuentes fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00) as civil
32
damages.
InaccordancewithSection10,Rule122oftheRulesofCourt,the
caseisnowbeforeusforautomaticreview.
In his lone assignment of error, the accusedappellant contends
that:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN CONVICTING THE ACCUSED OF
THE CRIME OF RAPE AND NOT OF ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS
CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY
OF THE VICTIM HERSELF AND
33
THEACCUSEDAPPELLANT.
7/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
pointsoutthatitwasonlyhisfingerthatinflictedthesaidlaceration
35
andnothispeniswitha31/2inchcircumference. Heinsiststhatif
hispeniswastheoneinsertedinthevictimsvagina,thelaceration
would have been
more severe and she would have died from
36
hemorrhaging. The accusedappellant, likewise, asserts that since
theprosecutionclaimedthattherewasanactualpenetration,itmust
prove,therefore,thatthesmalllacerationinthevictimshymenwas
caused by the accusedappellants sex organ. Considering the
physicalevidenceadducedinthecase,theaccusedappellantclaims
that he should have only been convicted of acts of lasciviousness
andnotrape.
Afterameticulousreviewoftheevidenceinthiscase,wefindno
cogentreasontodisturbthefindingsofthetrialcourt.Theevidence
clearly establishes the guilt of the accusedappellant beyond
reasonabledoubt.
________________
32Supra,note26at117.
33AppellantsBrief,Rollo,p.44.
34Id.,at47.
35Id.,at48.
36Id.
380
380
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
8/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
A Ihave(sic)myclothesononlytheshort(sic)andpantywere
takenoff.
Q Whenyourpantyandshort(sic)was(sic)alreadyremovedby
AlfonsoBalgosandhealreadyremovedhispantsandbriefs(sic),
whatdidAlfonsoBalgosdo,ifany?
A Helay(sic)ontopofmeandhispenisheputitonmyorgan.
Q Wheredidyoulay(sic)down?
A Onthematwithoutapillow.
________________
37People vs. Larena,G.R. Nos. 12120509, 29 June 1999, p. 12, 309 SCRA 305
381
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
381
Peoplevs.Balgos
Q YousaidAlfonsoBalgoswhileyouwerelyingdownonthemat
withoutapillowplacedhimselfontopofyou,didheplaced(sic)
hispenisinyourorgan?
ATTY.POTATO:
Objection,leading
COURT:
Alreadytestified.
PROSECUTOR:
Q WhenAlfonsoBalgosplacedhissexorganintoyourvagina,what
wasAlfonsoBalgosdoing?
A Hisorgan,hepusheditinandoutofmyorgan.
Q WhenAlfonsoBalgosplacedhisorganintoyourvaginainand
out,whatdidyoufeel?
A Pain.
Q AbouthowlongdidAlfonsoBalgosplaced(sic)hisorganinto
yourvaginainandoutabouthowlong?
A Forashortperiod.
COURT:
Q Didhisorganenteryourvagina?
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
9/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
A Nosir.
PROSECUTOR:
Q Butyoucanfeelthatittouchedyourvagina?
ATTY.POTATO:
Objection,leading.
COURT:
Sustained.
PROSECUTOR:
Q WhenAlfonsoBalgosstoppedplacinghisorganintoyourvagina
buthavingitinandoutwhatdidAlfonsoBalgosdo?
A Heagainputhispenisandpush(sic)itinandoutmotion.
COURT:
Q Whathappenedtoyourvaginaifanythinghappenedtoit?
A Nothing.
382
382
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
Q Yousaidthattheaccusedpushedhisagaininandoutofyour
vagina,howlongdidhedothat?
A Forashortperiod.
PROSECUTOR:
Q WhendidAlfonsoBalgosstopplacinghisorganintoyour
vagina?
A WhenMichele(sic)andWadayarrived.
Q HowdidyouknowthatMichele(sic)andWadayarrivedalready?
A Becausetheywerecomingandtheycanbeseenthroughthe
windowandAlfonsoBalgosoutonhispants.
Q Howaboutyou?
A Hecoveredmewithablanketandhehe(sic)letmeputonmy
pantybecauseMichele(sic)andWadaywereunlockingthedoor.
Q Was(sic)Michele(sic)andWadayabletoenterthehouse?
A Yessir.
Q WhenMichele(sic)andWadaywas(sic)alreadyinsidethehouse
youwerestillcoveredwithablanket?
ATTY.POTATO:
Objection,questionisleading.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
10/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
COURT:
Letheranswer.
A Yessir.
PROSECUTOR:
Q WhatdidAlfonsoBalgostellyouiftherewasany?
ATTY.POTATO:
Objection,questionisleading.
COURT:
Nobasis.
PROSECUTOR:
Q DidyoureportofwhatAlfonsoBalgosdidtoyouintheafternoon
ofOctober8,1995toyourparents?
ATTY.POTATO:
Objection,questionisleading.
COURT:
Nobasis.
383
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
383
Peoplevs.Balgos
PROSECUTOR:
Q
Didyoumeetyourmotherandfatherintheafternoonof
thatday?
Yessir.
Didyoutellyourparentsaboutwhathappenedtoyou?
ATTY.POTATO:
Objection,leading.
COURT:
Q
Didyouhaveanyconversationwithyourfatherand
mother?
Yessir.
PROSECUTOR:
Q
Whatwasyourconversationwithyourparents?
AstowhatAlfonsoBalgosdidtomethathewrestledme
(gindumog).
Q
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
11/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
IfAlfonsoBalgosisinsidethecourtroomnow,willyou
pointtotheHonorableCourtwhereheis?
A
There(witnesspointingtoapersonsittingontheside
benchwearingorangetshirtwhenaskedofhisname
answeredAlfonsoBalgos.)
PROSECUTOR:
Thatwouldbeall.
COURT:
Cross.
CROSSEXAMINATIONBYATTY.ALBERTPOTATO:
xxxxxxxxx
Q
NowyoualsotestifiedthatAlfonsoBalgosplacedhis
sexualorganinsideyourvaginaandpush(sic)itinand
out,isthatcorrect?
Yessir.
DidyoufeelthesexualorganofAlfonsoBalgosinside
yourvagina?
Nosir.
Youmeanitnevertouchedyourvagina,thesexualorgan
ofAlfonsoBalgosnevertouchedyourvagina?
Ittouchedthetop.
384
384
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
COURT:
Q OnwhatpartofyourvaginadidthepenisofAlfonsoBalgos
touches(sic)?
A Inthehole.
Q Butitdidnotentertheholeofthevagina.
A Nosir.
ATTY.POTATO:
Q NowyousaidthatAlfonsoBalgoswasontopofyou,wasitnot?
A Yessir.
Q So,youcouldnotseewhatwasactuallytouchingyourvagina
becauseshewasontopofyou?
A Nosir.
COURT:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
12/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
Q Howdidyoucometoknowthatitwastheorganoftheaccused
whichtouches(sic)theholeofyourvagina?
A Iknowbecausewithhishandheheldhisorganandputitinmy
vagina.
ATTY.POTATO:
Q Butasyouhavestatedhewasontopofyouandyoucouldnot
seewhatwastouchingyourvaginawhetheritwasasexorgan,the
sexorganofAlfonsoBalgosorthefingerofAlfonsoBalgos,isit
not?
A Nosir.
Q Haveyoueverfeltbefore,priortothisincidentinquestion,ever
feltthetouchofamaleorgantoyourvagina?
A Nosir.
Q So,youcannotdistinguishwhetherwhattouchedyourvaginawas
amaleorganorafingertoyourvagina?
A WhilewewerewatchingTVinourneighborshouse,itwashis
fingerthatheputinsidemyvagina.
COURT:
Q Whendidtheaccusedplacehisfingerinyourvaginawhile
watchingTV,wasitbeforetheincidentinquestion?
A Nosir.
Q Howmanytimesbeforetheincidentinquestiondidheplacehis
fingerinyourvagina?
385
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
385
Peoplevs.Balgos
A Onlyones(sic).
Q Inwhatplacedidhedid(sic)that?
A Inourneighborshouse.
Q Wasitinsideyourneighborshouseoroutside?
A Insideourneighborshouse.
ATTY.POTATO:
Q Weretherepeopleinsidethehouseofyourneighboratthattime?
A Yessir.
Q Therewerepeoplewatching?
A Yessir.
COURT:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
13/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
Q Watchingwhat?
A Watchingpowerrangerin(sic)theTV.
xxxxxxxxx
ATTY.POTATO:
Q Duringtheincidentinquestionyoucouldnotdefinitelytell
whethertheaccusedplacedhissexualorganinyourvaginaorjust
hisfinger,amIcorrect?
A Hisorgan.
Q Didyouseehissexualorganactuallyplacedinyourvagina,by
theaccused?
A Nosir.
ATTY.POTATO:
ThatsallYourHonor.
39
386
386
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
Ontheotherhand,accusedappellantsassertionthathemerelyput
his finger into the victims vagina is incredible and contrary to the
evidence.Ifthiswasallthathedid,whydidhehavetopulldown
thezipperofhispants,puthispenisout,layhimselfontopofher,
put his organ into hers, move it in and out of her organ, meaning
doing a push and pull movement? And while he was doing this,
Crissellesaidshefeltpain.Ontopofthis,themedicalexamination
conductedonhershowedalaceratedwoundinherorganpositioned
at3oclock.IfCrissellesstorywastheproductofherimagination,
astheaccusedappellantwouldlikethisCourttobelieve,shewould
havepaintedforthecourtamoredastardlyandgruesomepictureof
her ordeal. But true to her innocence and coyness, being only six
yearsold,thewordssheusedoncrossexaminationweremild.She
42
mentioned that his penis did not penetrate her vagina but that it
43
onlytoucheditshole, thattheattemptoftheaccusedappellantto
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
14/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
43
onlytoucheditshole, thattheattemptoftheaccusedappellantto
44
satisfy his lust for flesh was only for a short period, that nothing
happenedtohervaginaaftertheaccusedappellanttriedtoinserthis
45
peniswithaninandoutmotion, andthatshedidnotactuallysee
46
the penis of the accusedappellant enter her vagina. These are
telltale signs at the victims honesty and candor in relating her
unsavory experience at the hands of accusedappellant. It has been
stressed often enough that the testimony 47of rape victims who are
youngandimmaturedeservefullcredence.
In any case, even if his organ merely touched the holeof
Crisselles vagina, this already constitutes rape since the complete
penetrationofthepenisintothefemaleorganisnot
________________
42TSN,1March1996,p.19.
43Id.,at1819.
44Id.,at1112.
45Id.,at11.
46Id.,at1920.
47Peoplevs.Carullo,G.R.No.129289,29July1999,p.9,311SCRA680People
vs.Pineda,G.R.Nos.11831213,28July1999,p.11,311SCRA368.
387
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
387
Peoplevs.Balgos
48
15/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
thathelearnedfromtheBarangayCaptainoftheaccusationsagainst
him.
________________
48Peoplevs.Peurtollano,G.R. No. 122423, 17 June 1999, p. 10, 308 SCRA 356
Peoplevs.Quianola,G.R.No.126148,5May1999,p.23,306SCRA710Peoplevs.
Almaden,G.R.No.112088,25March1999,p.8,305SCRA157.
49Peoplevs.Silvano,G.R.No.127356,29June1999,p.9,309SCRA362People
vs.Ablog,G.R.No.124005,28June1999,p.8,309SCRA222.
50Peoplevs.Ayo,G.R.No.123540,30March1999,p.12,305SCRA543.
51Rollo,pp.8790.
388
388
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
FISCALPOSADAS:
Q
CriseldaFuentes,doyouknowacertainCrisselleFuentes?
Yessir,mydaugther.
HowoldisyourdaughterCrisselleFuentes?
7yearsold.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
16/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
________________
52Peoplevs.Carullo,289SCRA481,496(1998)Peoplevs.Nang,289SCRA16,
31(1998)Peoplevs.Azugue,268SCRA711,723(1997).
53Peoplevs.Lozano,296SCRA403,415(1998).
54Peoplevs.Trimor,243SCRA129,132(1995).
55FurtheramendedbyRepublicActNo.8353,otherwiseknownasTheAntiRape
Law.
56ExhibitB,Records,p.62.
389
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
389
Peoplevs.Balgos
Q Doyouknowwhenisthedateofbirthofyourdaughter?
A November24,1988.
Q DoyouhaveanydocumentstoshowthatCrisselleFuentesis
yourdaughterandthatyourdaughterCrisselleFuenteswasborn
onNovember24,1988?
A Yes,sir.
Q Now,IamshowingtoyouaCertificateofLiveBirth,willyou
pleasegooverthisifthisisthedocumentwhichyousaid?
A Yes,sir.
FISCALPOSADAS:
Irequest,YourHonorforthepurposeofcomparison,Iam
showingthiscertifiedoriginaloftheBirthCertificateofCrisselle
Fuentestobecomparedwiththemachinecopy,YouHonorI
requestAtty.Potatotocomparetheoriginalwiththemachine
copy.
ATTY.POTATO:
Admitted,yourhonor.
COURT:
Noted.
57
Withrespecttotheawardofdamages,wehaverecentlyheldthatif
the commission of rape is effectively qualified by any of the58
circumstances under which the penalty of death may be imposed,
thecivilindemnityforthevictimshallnot
________________
57TSN,5March1996,p.3.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
17/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
58UnderArt.335oftheRevisedPenalCode,thedeathpenaltyshallbeimposedif
thecrimeiscommittedwithanyofthefollowingattendingcircumstances:
1. When the victim is under eighteen (18) years of age and the offender is a
parent,ascendant,stepparent,guardian,relativebyconsanguinityoraffinity
withinthethirdcivildegree,orthecommonlawspouseoftheparentofthe
victim.
2. Whenthevictimisunderthecustodyofpoliceormilitaryauthorities.
3. Whentherapeiscommittedinfullviewofthehusband,parent,anyofthe
childrenorotherrelativeswithinthethirddegreeofconsang
uinity.
390
390
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
Peoplevs.Balgos
59
belessthanSeventyFiveThousandPesos(P75,000.00). Basedon
the foregoing judicial prescription, the trial courts award
of Fifty
60
Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity should be
increasedtoSeventyFiveThousandPesos(P75,000.00).Moreover,
the victim is
entitled to moral damages under Article 2219 of the
61
CivilCode,
withoutthenecessityforpleadingorproofofthebasis
62
thereof. In line with current jurisprudence, accused appellants
victimisentitledtomoraldamagesintheamountofFiftyThousand
63
Pesos(P50,000.00).
_______________
4. Whenthevictimisareligiousorachildbelowseven(7)yearsold.
5. When the offender knows that he is afflicted with Acquired Immune
DeficiencySyndrome(AIDS)disease.
6. WhencommittedbyanymemberoftheArmedForcesofthePhilippinesor
thePhilippineNationalPoliceoranylawenforcementagency.
7. Whenbyreasonoronoccasionoftherape,thevictimhassufferedpermanent
physicalmutilation.
59Peoplevs.Losano,G.R.No.127122,20July1999,p.17,310SCRA707People
vs. Aquino and Catap, G.R. Nos. 12355051, 19 July 1999, p. 24, 310 SCRA 437
Peoplevs.Alitagtag,G.R.Nos.12444951,29June1999,p.11,309SCRA325.
60Supra,note26at117.
61Art.2219.Moraldamagesmayberecoveredinthefollowingandanalogouscase:
xxxxxxxxx
(3)seduction,abduction,rapeorotherlasciviousacts
xxxxxxxxx
Theparentsofthefemaleseduced,abductedorraped,orabused,referredtoinNo.
3ofthisArticle,mayalsorecovermoraldamages.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
18/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
xxxxxxxxx
62Peoplevs.Mijano,G.R.No.129112,p.17,23July1999,311SCRA81.
63Peoplevs.Flores,G.R.No.130546,p.13,26July1999,311SCRA170.
391
VOL.323,JANUARY26,2000
391
Peoplevs.Balgos
FourmembersoftheCourtmaintaintheirpositionthatRepublicAct
No. 7659, insofar as it prescribes the death penalty, is
unconstitutionalneverthelesstheysubmittotherulingoftheCourt,
byamajorityvote,thatthelawisconstitutionalandthatthedeath
penaltyshouldbeaccordinglyimposed.
WHEREFORE, the decision of the trial court finding accused
appellantAlfonsoBalgos,aliasLupog,guiltybeyondreasonable
doubtofthecrimeofrapeandsentencinghimtosufferthepenalty
ofdeathisherebyAFFIRMED,withtheMODIFICATIONthatthe
accusedappellantisorderedtoindemnifythevictimintheamount
of SeventyFive Thousand Pesos (P75,000.00) as civil indemnity
andFiftyThousandPesos(P50,000.00)asmoraldamages.
In accordance with Section 25 of Republic Act No. 7659,
amendingArticle83oftheRevisedPenalCode,uponfinalityofthis
Decision, let the records of this case be forthwith forwarded to the
OfficeofthePresidentforpossibleexerciseofexecutiveclemency
orpardoningpower.
Nopronouncementastocost.
SOORDERED.
Davide,Jr.(C.J.),Bellosillo,Melo,Puno, Vitug, Kapunan,
Mendoza, Panganiban, Quisumbing, Purisima, Pardo, Buena,
GonzagaReyes,YnaresSantiagoandDeLeon,Jr.,JJ.,concur.
Judgmentaffirmedwithmodification.
Notes.Wherethevictim,atthetimeofherpenileinvasion,was
unconscious,itcouldsafelybeconcludedthatshehadnotgivenfree
and voluntary consent to her defilement, whether before or during
thesexualact.(Peoplevs.Mahinay,302SCRA455[1999])
Jurisprudence has consistently held that full penetration of the
femalegenitalorganisnotindispensabletosustainaconvictionfor
rapeitsufficesthatthereisproofoftheen
392
392
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
AbbottLaboratoriesPhilippines,Inc.vs.AbbottLaboratories
EmployeesUnion
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
19/20
11/3/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME323
trance of the male organ within the labia of the pudendum of the
femaleorgan.(Peoplevs.DelaCuesta,304SCRA83[1999])
o0o
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000158285694d935ba860c003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
20/20