Está en la página 1de 66

UNCLASSIRFIED

.A~m

ll

I i.--I

AD 268 731
ARMED SF.I(T" TE(:CHNICAI, INFO.HMAION AGENCY
ARLINGIT)ON HALL STATION
ARILIIN(GTON 12, VIRGINIA

ULr NC LA S S.,RF E D

NOTICE: When government or other drawings, specifications or other data are used for any purpose
other than in connection with a definitely related
government procurement operation, the U. S.
Government thereby incurs no responsibility, nor any
obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the Government may have formulated, furnished, or in any way
supplied the said drawings, specifications, or other
data is not to be regarded by implication or otherwise as in any manner licensing the holder or any
other person or corporation, or conveying any rights
or permission to manufacture, use or sell any
patented invention that may in any way be related
thereto.

NAVWE2S REPORT

7744

NOTS TI' 2711

COPY 10 6

LIQUID INJECTION THRUST VECTOR CONTROL


by

C. J. Green

C-1-

and
F. McCullough, Jr.
Propulsion Development Department

"14

CT.
The technique of obtaining thrust vector control by the
T
ctio.n of a liquid into the supersonic region of a rocket nozzle
QAs been studied.
This report presents the experimental results
'Z4tained with various liquid injectants together with the effects
of some of the more critical physical parameters.
Liquids studied
were water, Freon-12, Perchloroethylene, nitrogen tetroxide and
bromine.
In addition, unsymmetrical dimethyihydrazine and inhibited
red fuming nitric acid were injected simultaneously to explore the
effect of energy release in the nozzle exit cone with bipropellant
injection.
Data on the relationships of side force to injectant
flow rate, the effect of axial location of the injection port, the
effect of injection pressure and the effects of injectant properties
are presented and discussed.

Released to ASTIA ror further di.zsemiwitiori with


out limitations beyond those ialpo:tUd by w2,4nity

regulations.

U.S.

NAVAL

ORDNANCE TEST STATION

China Lake, California


16 June 1961

U.

S.

NAVAL

ORDNANCIE

TEST

STATION

AN ACT!VITY OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS


C. BLENMAN, JR.,

USN

CAPT.,
Commander

Wm. G. MCLEAN, PH.D.


Technical Director

FOREWORD

The results of secondary injection tests conducted at the Naval


Ordnance Test Station during March and April 1960 are presented in
this publication.
This program was supported by Special Projects
Task Assignment 71402-2.
This report was reviewed for technical accuracy by J.
and C. W. Bernard.

A.

Bowen

JAMES T. BARTLING
Propulsion Development Department

Head,

Released under
the authority of:
Wim. B. McLEAN
Technical Director

NOTS Technical Publication 2711


NAVWEPS Report 7744
Published by . . . . .
Collation . .
. . . .
First printing
. . . .
Security classification

.*.

.......

Propulsion Development Department


Cover, 29 leaves, abstract cards
. . . . .
.
. . 210 numbered cories
...........
. . . ..
. UNCLASSIFIED
.

ORDNANC

WlAVAL

U.S.

AN ACT!VITY OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL

C. BLENMAN, JR., CAPT., USN

ft.

STATION

TEST

WEAPONS

13. McLEAN, PH.D.


Technical Director

Commander

FOREWORD

conducted at the Naval


The results of secondary injection tests
Ordnance Test Station during March and April 1960 are presented in
This program was supported by Special Projects
this publication.

Task Assignment 71402-2.


This report was reviewed for technical accuracy by J. A. Bowen
and C.

W. Bernard.
JAMES T. BARTLING
ead,, Propulsion Development Department

Released under
the authority of:
Win. B. McLEAN
Technical Director

NOTS Technical Publication 2711


NAVWEPS Report 7744
. . . .
Published by .
. .
. . . .
Collation
. . . .
First printing
Security classification

.a.

..

.....

.
.

Propulsion Development Department


Ccver, 29 leaves, abstract cards
. a210 numbered copies
*.
. . . .
. . . . . . . . UNCLASSIFIED
.

Naval Avionics Facility, Indianapolis (Library)


Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak (Library)
Naval Propellant Plant, Indian Head (Technical Library)
Naval Research Laboratory (Code 2021)
Naval Underwater Ordnance Station, Newport
Naval Weapons Laboratory, Dahlgren (Technical Library)
Naval Weapons Plant (Code 755)
Naval Weapons Services Office, Naval Weapons Plant
Operational Test and Evaluation Force
Bureau of Naval Weapons Flcet Readiness Representative Pacific, Naval
Air Station, North Island
1 Bureau of Naval Weapons Resident Representative, Sadramento (SPLA)
1 Bureau of Naval Weapons Representative, Azusa
4 Chief of Ordnance

1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1

ORDTA
ORDTB
ORDTS
ORDTU

(i)
(i
(i
(1)

2 Aberdeen Proving Ground


Ballistic Research Laboratories (1)
Development and Proof Services (1)
8 Army Rocket and Guided Missile Agency, Redstone Arsenal
ABMA (.1)
0RDIDW- IDE (i)
ORDXR-ODA (1)
ORDXR-OTL, Technical Library (4)
0RDXR-RRC (I)
1 Diamond Ordnance Fuze Laboratory (Library)
2 Frankford Arsenal
ORDBA-1421 (1)
Pitman-Dunn Laboratory (i)
1 Picatinny Arsenal (Library)
1 Rock Island Arsenal
3 White Sands Missile Range (Library)
1 Headquarters, U. S. Air Force (AF)RD-CC)
3 Aeronautical Systems Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
ASAPRD-Dist (1)
ASRSSP-lO (2)
Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Laurence G. Hanscom Field
Air
1
1 Air Proving Ground Center. Eglin Air Force Base (PGE.M)
1 Air University Library, Maxwell Air Force Base
I Hol.loian Air Forece Bu:,c
2 0gdCtrn Ai-r It-turiel Area, Hi11 Air Force Base (CORE)
I Tactical Air Coimiand, langluy Air Force Base (TPL-RQD-M)

I Advanced Rc:;earch Projects Agency


10
1
1
1

Armed Services Technical Information Agency (TIPCR)


Weapons Sy.;tems Evaluation Group
National Aeronautics & Space Administration (Mr. Cohen)
Acrojet-General Corporation, Azusa, Calif. (Librarian) via BuWepsRep

,NTSGL 583(11-61)210

1
I
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
3
I

Aerojet-Genefral Corporation, Sacramento (Librarian) v-ia BuWopaRRep


Allegany Ballistics Laboratory, Cumberland, Md.
Allison Division, General Motors Corporation, Indianapolis (A. Sobey)
Applied Physics Laboratory, JHU, Silver Spring
ARDE Associates, Paramus, N. J. (Librarian)
Arthur D. Little, Thc., Cambridge (W. H. Varley)
Atlantic Research Corporation, Alexandria, Va.
Bermite Powder Company, Saugas, Calif. (L. LeFiego)
9
Continental Aviation and Engineering Corporation, Dletroit (rLibraiCornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc., Buffalo (Arthur N. Lappin)
Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc., El Segundo (Chief Engineer)
Experiment, Tnc., Richmond, Va.
General Electric Comvpany, Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Department,
Cincinnati (Applied Research Group, Dan Harseman)
Hercules Powder Company, Explosives Department, Wilmington (Dr. D. F. Gunder)
(Research and Development
Hughes Aircraft Company, Culver City, Calif.
Library)
Institute for Defense Analyses
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, CIT, Pasadena (Dr. W. H. Pickering)
LiquiL Propellant Information Agency, Applied Physics Laboratory, JHL,
Silver Spring
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, Missiles and Space Division, Palo Alto,
Calif. (Librarian)

1 Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, Missiles and Space Division, Van Nuys,


Calif. (Resident Director)
I North American Aviation, Inc., Missile Division, Downey, Calif. (Magineering Library 495-12)
1 Operations Research Office, J`IIU, Bethesda, Md. (Document Control
Office)
1 Ramo-Wooldridge, Canoga Park, Calif. (Technical Information Services)
2 Rocketdyne, Canoga Park
C. Rodriquez (1)
Librarian (1)
2 Robm & Haas Coiapany, Redstone Arsenal Research Division (Librarian)
1 Ryan Aeronautical Company, San Diego (C. F. Friend)
3 Solid Propellant Infonration Agency, Applied Phys lcs Laboratory, JHUJ,
Silver Spring
1 Space Technolcgy Laboratories, Inc., Los Angeles
1 Temco Aircraft Corporation, Dallas, (Manager, Developmental Engineering)
1 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.
1 Tniokol Chemical Cor-poration, Elkton, Md. (Technical Information Center)
1 Thiokol Chemical Corporation Redstone Division, Redstone Arsenal,
(Teonnical Library)
1 Thiokol Chemical Corporation, Utah Division, Brigham City (Library
Section)
1 University of Chicago, Institute for Air Weapons Research, Chicago

(I.lbrary)
1 United Aircraft Corporation, East Hartford, Conn.
1 United Thchnolc..r

Corporation,

",,.Snnyvale, Ca-if.

(M, S.hw'lger)
(D. D. Ordaht)

NAVWIPS RETORT

774

INTRODUCTION

As the perfonrance of propulsion systems increases, accompanied


in most cases by increased combustion temperatures, the problem of
satisfactory materials for mechanical thrust-vector control devices
With this problem in mind a study of
becomes increasingly critical.
control was initiated at the
thrust
vector
of
possible techniques
Navel Ordnance Test Station in 1958 (Ref. 1). The technique of
injecting a fluid. into the expansion cone of a supersonic nozzle
(secondary injection) to produce a usable side force or th.ust vector
force appeared to be the most promising new technique (Fig. 1).
The initial study of the secondary injection technique, using
cold-flow (air) equipment, was reported by the United Aircraft
Following work was performed by the Naval
Corporation (Ref. 2).
Air Rocket Test Station (Ref. 3), by United Aircraft Corporation
(Ref. 4), and the Naval Ordnhance Test Station (Ref. 5 and 6), all
with gases as the injected fluids. These studies, in general, indicated that for maximunm effectiveness the injected gas should be near
To avoid the
the combustion temperature of the main-stream gases.
high temperature material problems and to meet system requirements
The feasibility of
the use of liquids as injectants was proposed.
using liquids was demonstrated early in 1959 (Ref. 7).

FJERBIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Both liquid and solid propellant motors were used in this experiOne injection test was conducted using a quartermentaiL progrum.
scale SUBHOC motor loaded with B. F. Goodrich E-l0'( polyurethane propell ant cuntaining 17.'( )ercent as tmnnirm by weirrht.
The remainder of'
the te:sto:; were conducted with the liquid propelLant applied research
motor (]PARM).

LI'ARM TESTS
The LPUARM,
tion chamber,

.
injector, water-cooled combusFig. P, con;ist't,; o .-an
For the work reported in
and tie niozzlc ttust section.

IL

NAVWEPS RETORT

7744

U)

44

0-,

0
00

Iw

00

CY)
00

00
<

co

,0

cci

NAWEP

EPORT

744

0d
(D,

Iz
<0

<

wH

8
0

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

this paper, the LPARM was operated with unsymmetrical dimethy]hydrazine


and inhibited red fuming nitric acid (UDMH and IRFNA) at the nominal
conditions given in Table 1.
Measurements which were recorded during each test were:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Main thrust
Side thrust
Chamber pressure
Injection pressure
Oxidizer manifold pressure
Oxidizer line pressure
Fuel manifold pressure
Fuel line pressure
Oxidizer flow rate
InjectEunt flow rate
Fuel flow rate
Coolant water flow rate

Four types of secondary injection tests were conducted: single


axial position (constant secondary fluid flow rate) (type C, Fig. 3),
tests in which injection occurred at four different axial positions
(type B, Fig. 4), variable secondary flow rate tests (type A, Fig. 5),
and blpropellant injection tests (Fig. 6).
Test type A was accomplished through the use of a hydraulically-operated, flow control valve
which was opened and closed with water pressure.
Opening and closing
speed could be adjusted by metering the water to or from the pistonoperated valve.
Test type B utilized a series of four solenoid valves,
which were opened and closed sequentially during the tests.
The test nozzles, Fig. 7 and 8, were uncooled aid used graphite
throat inserts.
These nozzles were adequate for tests of three to
four seconds duration. The 16 point nozzle, Fig. 7, was fabricated
with four rows of four orifices 90 degrees apart.
Each row of orifices
was drilled a different diameter.
This arrangement permitted the effect
of orifice area arid axial location of the injection port to be studied.
All orifices were round and were drilled perpendicular to the nozzle
axis.
For the bipropel ant. III
nt....tos the basic nozzle body was
modified to permit the insertion of bipropellant Injectors, Fig. 8.
Side-force meas-Vurements were accomplished through the use of a
pivot .mount, lover an., arid Wianko force transducer.
The side-force
assembly was in turn fastened to a flexure mount to permit the mea:surement of axial thrusL, Fig. 9.
All side-Force measurements reported
are reiol ved to a point on the nozzn,
().hi': inches from the throat.
Calibration of both side-force arid axial thr'ust wats accompi isished "i:
pl-ace" tihrin;',h the .ue of Muorehotuse pwtagv~ij rings.

NAVWEPS REPOR T7

NITROGEN
.LU CONTROL
PANF.L

PRE-

E
CO

REGUATORINJECTION

9 1OPE L LA N T

IN L E IT

VALVE

FIG.

3.

Schematic of Test Installation for Study


of Secondary injection--Test Type C

NAVWEPS REPORT 77i44

1- 0
w L.

zm

4w

zq
z~-

0-0LJ
4-

>03

44

61

o<J
W>

2d

-H $-

43

AVWEP$

__________________________

M~ORT

7744

C4

00
CcC

CC,
W

0~i~'~I

0>

It

CA)
I

'-i

0
IL

(fl

Co

-J

0L

t)

7u

IIAVWEPS REPORT 77~44

cr,-

00
-i-

-. 1w
0-a0

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

[4
N

1N

CDI

+3

NAY wEP8 RETORT Ti 44

ItI

ZnZ

111-0

*1-I

10,

AVWITPS REPORT 7714

__________

U)

U.

a.-z
U)

0~
41

oW

04w;0

00
00

NAVWEPS REPORT 77y44.

In the tests of secondary injection, the motor was allowed to


begin operating smoothly before injection was started. This permitted
the measurement of :ide-force as a change in side-force, thus cancelling the effects of any main thrust malalignments and other sidc-fcrce
effects caused by motor operation.
Typical LPARM tests may be seen in Fig. 10 and 11.

the LMMAM

Figure 10 shows

operatIng without secondaryi noncton;. FigV 11 shows opera-

tion with secondary injection.

QUARTER-SCALE SUBROC TESTS


The test of secondary injection using a solid propellant motor was
conducted primarily for purposes of data comparison.
The effects of
different motor performances and the aluminized propellant were of
particular interest.
In addition, three different injection geometries
were investigated.
Figure 12 depicts the quarter-scale SUBROC nozzle
used in this test.
'The characteristics of the quarter-scale SUBROC
motor are given in Table 2.
The following measurements were recorded
during this test:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Axial thrust
Chamber pressure
Injection pressure
Side thrust
Injection flow rate

Both Freon-12 and nitrogen tetroxide were used as injectants for


this test.
Nitrogen tetroxide was injected through a single orifice
only, and Freon-12 was injected through both single and multiple
orifice configurations.
The fluids were injected in a cyclic fashion during the first
26
seconds of the 35 second motor burning time.
An attempt to vary the
flow rate of each injectant by the "blow-down" technique was only
partially successful due to faulty check valves.
Figure 13 shows the.
test schematic, and Fig. 14 and 15 show the motor in position for
firing.
Side-force was measured in

two planes 90 degrees apart with

Wianko force transducers as shown in Fig. 14.


resolved to the nozjle exit plane.

12

All side-forces are

I'TAVP

yyhh

kEPOBT

4).10

liii nIL
ill'
I."
NI"
I"
"I
I."
'II

'II"

0
ci)
4)

0
tZ)

1I
C.'

C,..

.31
I:;

NAVWFPS

iEPORT

774h

a
41
C)

rl
U

ci,
ri-)

41

ill
III

IslE

1101

j
I

NAVWE~PS REPORT 7744+

CYC

1%.~

U)U
cni

cni

CYl

In

(xi

ui
Ui

K9i

15

NAVWWPS

EPPORT 7744

N2

N2

N2

N)2

REGULATOR

CHECKI

VALVES

>7

__ D.C. VA LVE

Sr,

MANIFOLD
N2 O4

I I

FREON

FREON

FREON

FLOW
) 1

, ) METERS I

I
POS,

FIG_

FIG. 13.

16

11

~f7

POS.2

I!

I jIi I

Pos,31

_ I_ 0... .

P0. 4. . .

Quarter-Scale SUBIROC Piping Schematic

. .J

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

*<-

JI. A.-Q

r~

WE oC, c

,es

.tl

*117

17

NAVWEPS"' REP-ORT

'i'

*Ugll

44*

NAVWmE

RORT 7744

RESULTS
Seven fluids, including UDMH and IRFlA, were used as injectants
in this experimental program. The five fluids used individually were
as follows: Freon-12, perchloroethylene, water, nitrogen tetroxide,
and bromine. Tabulated data are presented in Tables 3 and 4 from the
LPARM and quarter-scale BUBROC tests respectively.

LPARM DATA
Most data presented graphically in this report are in the form of
the ratio of side-force to main thrust versus the ratio of secondary
flow rate to mhin flow rate (Fs/Fm versus w5 /Wc.
Consequently, the
slope of the line describing the best fit to the data points represents
the ratio of the specific impulse of the secondary fluid to the specific
impulse of the main stream gases. This slope has been termed the performance ratio.
The position number noted on each graph refers to
axial location and size of the injection port, Fig. 7.
In some cases, fluids were injected through two orifices located
in line axially. Consequently, the notation on the graphs, or iin the
data tabulation, calls out two position numbers.
The reproducibility of the LPARM side thrust measuring system may
be seen in Fig. 16. This figure shows the actual data points obtained
from eight different tests of Freon-12 injection.

FREON-12 INJECTION
The family of curves shown in Fig. 17 represents the results
obtained by injecting Freon-12 at four different axial locations
through orifices 0.152 inch in diameter.
These data are shown again
in a plot of performance ratio (Fs/Fm versus 4 s/Sn) as a function of
axial location at injectant flow rates of five, ten, and fifteen percent of the main propellant fw.. rate, Fig4 18. Both figures show the
interdependence of injectant flow rate and axial location upon injectant performance.
Figure 19 shows the result obtained by injecting Freon-12 through
0.104-inch-diameter orifices at two different axial locations.
The
solid portions of the curve indicate the range in which data were
obtained.

19

AVWEPS

REPORT 7744

'S.i
00

OD

0o

Cd

M~rL

IIn

00

OD

20

.4 a

00

Sr--i

*'-I

KA.VwF2S R.EPORT 77144

z
0
0.0

NO

IIwo

zz

00

2
0.

*11
OD

C-4

co0

I--

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744.

LC)D

[:)4)

221ii

NAVWEPS REPORT 1144i

z
0

-0

00

0.0
41-)

23

NAWFPS REPORT _744

PERCHLOROETHYLENE INJECTION
Figures 20 and 21 show the results obtained by injecting
perceLIoroethylene through 0.152- and 0.104-inch-diameter orifices at
various axial locations.
Position 16 (0.152-inch-diameter) corresponds to position 14 (0.104-inch-diameter) in axial location, Fig. 7.
WATER INJECTION

Figure 22 shows the results.obtained from water injection through


one 0.152-inch-diameter orifice (position 12), and through two 0.152inch-diameter orifices (position 16 and 12).
BIPROPELLANT INJECTION
Figure 23 shows the results obtained from the simultaneous injection of UDMH and IRFNA.
These tests were intended to determine the
effects of any exothermic reaction of the injectant within the expansion cone.
Two injector designs were used for these tests (Fig. 8);
both designs provided approximately the same results.
Bipropellant
injection provided the highest performance ratio obtained in this
test series.

LPARM DATA SUM4ARY


Figure 24 compares the results obtained from double orifice injection with Freon-12, perchloroethylene, and water.
Figure 25 shows the
relative performances obtained with bromine, UDMH and IRFNA, Freon-12,
perchloroethylene, and water at similar axial locations.

SUBROC DATA SUMMARY


Figure 26 is a summary of data obtained from the injection tests
with the quarter-scale SUBROC motor.
Both Freon-12 and nitrogen
tetroxide were used as inlectants for this test.
Nitrogen tetroxide
was injected through a single orifice only, and Freon-12 was injected
through both single and multiple orifice configurations (Fig. 12).
In Fig. 26, "Freori-12 radial" and "Freon-12 parUil e" refer tu
positions 2 and 4 respectively in Fig. 12.
Mutn propellant flow rates
were obtained by dividing the main thrust by tht, propellant specific
impulse.
The propellant specific impulse wa. assumed to remain constant over the test duration.

24

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

z0

00

oo
C)

cc

'25

di

NAVWEPS

MEORT

77'144

'0

00
00

00

26

4-3

NAVWEIPS RgEPORT

(0

zz
0

140
co,

4d)

cli

00
1-H

27

XAVWEPS REFORT

77i44

Cd

"+3

0
OD,

(0

Fri

(0

9l

C.'8

01

NAVVWPS ]REPORT 7744

0u

0w Cn

Ir

0
0~0
0)

0
0

"NO

1-4

NO
''\ \\

\ \\

0
"

SI

0
I

.i

H0

IXt

NAVWEPS REPORT 7144

0
%

0O

= a.

21

oz

0
0

zQz
0(I0

.L.

u~o-

'I

OD

300

NAV WEPS REPORT

%J

zr

0 WD0

04

cr

U.
U

u.a.O

0(.

LaJa
'

0-

%~

04-

'I

cl2

00
1..4

I3

'7Z44

NAVWZPS REPORT 7144

DISCUSSION
RELATION OF SIDE THRUST TO INJECTANT FLOW RATE
For a given orifice size and axial location, the variation in
side thrust with secondary flow rate was found, in many cases, to be
essentially linear, i.e., the injectant specific impulse was found to
The performbe constant over the flow range covered in these tests.
ance ratio, or slope of the plot of Ps/Fm versus ws/4m, is related to
injectant specific impulse in that the performance ratio is equal to
the injectant specific impulse divided by the motor specific impulse.
The SUBROC data indicate a tendency for the performance ratio of an
injectant to remain constant with changes in motor, or rather propellant, performance.
Thus, injectant specific impulse may be
increased if motor performance, via propellant performance, is increased.
However, other factors affect the value of the performance
ratio of a particular injectant, such as axial location, injectant
momentum, and injection orifice configuration.
EFFECTS OF AXIAL LOCATION
The test data indicate an optimum axial location for maximum
injectant performance, which is dependent upon injectant flow rate.
The LPARM data indicate that injeetant performance increases, for
secondary flow rates of five to 15 percent through a 0.1-52-inchdiameter orifice, as the injection port is moved upstream to a point
approximately 3.5 inches from the throat. As secondary flow rates
exceed approximately 13 percent of main propellant flow rate at
position 12, the performance ratio of Freon-12 appeared to decrease.
It is believed that this reduction of' the performtance ratio of an
injectant at high I'low rates may be attributed to extreme radial dispersion of the pressure fiela caus.ing side-force, or reflection of
the shock wave off the wall opposite the injection port.
In either
case, the integration of the radial components of the pressure area
forces can yield a decreased component of side-force. Data obtained
from the three-port parallel orifice configuration, Fig. 12, indicate
a reduction of the performance ratio of the injectant. This reduction was probably due to the radial spread of the pressure field.
The three-port radial configuration, on the other hand, showed an
increase in the performance ratio over the single-port configiration,
indicating that some radial spread may be desired, probably due to
the increase in mixing efficiency, and heat transfer.

32

NAVWM:PS REPORT 7744

EFFECT OF INJECTION PRESSURE


Variations In the performance ratio of a single injectant have
been noted when the area of the injection port le changed
The data
presented in this report indicate a relation between the rate of
change of momentum of the injected fluid to the side thrust developed
(Fig. 27, 28, and 29).
In Fig. 28, the ratio FS Fm has been plotted
as a ,tunrtion of (&s/Qie ,
2A)1
. The square of the main propellant
flow rate
j) was Inle
i the rate of change of injectant momentur term to take into consideration discrepancies in motor performance
2 -AgtA )l 2 is
and thrust levels, Fig . 27.
Thus, (ws'*c
essentially a
rate of change of' momentumi ratio, as the rath of change of momentum of
the exhaust gases is proportional to 'wrc2 . Data on injection through
two different sizes of oririces, and even forsimultaneous injection
through two orifices in line axially, appear to lie on essentially a
single straight line when plotted on log paper.
The data for these
graphs were obtained From graphs of Fs/Fm versus izWc ifor similar
axial locations
Figure 29 shows points of equivalent secondary flow
rates through various orifice diameters.
From this arrangement of
datn It may be seen that injection pressure should be as high as
possible for a given flow rate.
Appreciable increases in the performance ratio of an injectant may be obtained by increasing the injection
pressure.
The increase in performance may be due to greater Injectant
penetration of the exhaust gases under these conditions.
From Fig. 29 the following approximate equation describing Freon12 injection was obtained:
22
2

00.223 (ws/wc

9.1A)l

Because the data i'rom which this equation was derived covers only
a relatively small range of conditions, it is highly approximate.
Subsequent testing over a wider range has indicated a tendency of the
injectant performance to approximate the curves of Fig. 30.
This
figure predicts the p;erformance curves of Freon-12 when injected by
a variable area, constant pressure technique.
These curves were generated through the use of the approximate Freon-12 injection equation.

EFFECT OF TNJECTANT CHARACTERISTICS


The total side-force resulting F'rom the injection of a fluid into
the expansion cone of' a rocket nozzle may be considered to consist of
two cmponents:
(1) a component W' side-force due to the thrust of
the fPluid upon injection (product of mass Vlow rate and velocity plus

33

NAVWEPS REPOR~T 7744

0
0

oc
0 0

CL a0

CL
0

0
W.:USi

3h

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

_I

@4
0

000
(.0

N
0

0~ 4

"

0 <Oo

00900 0

I I

1111

II

I !

00

0
.

35

MEORT 7744

NAVWXEPS

Q
E0

Ifl

00A

iq

it

C0

00

0
00-3C

0~~

en

_n

(Z1

0H

00

qt

36

OD)
00

(D

Nq

it)

)(

CQ

0
0

U')

0',

(.

0
0

1144

NAVW!PS REPORT

CL

C O

0-

I 4'

0~0)
t&.to

2w
- 0

-i
LL.

in4
v,

-3

\n

(n

uidrun

\
',

U)

())

-OD

0
0

in

.L

01400

--

2Y
0%
4
CQ ~

~
a42:U

,a

0Q
4

L37

NAVWB2S REPORT 7744

a pressure area term for gas injection), and (2) a component due to the
The
interaction of the injected fluid with the main-stream gases.
second component consists of a static pressure recovery of the mainstream gases acting over an asymmetrical area within the nozzle.
The
pressure area force resulting from this pressure recovery represents
from 80 to 90 percent of the total developed side-force, in the case
of liquid injection.
A one-dimensional model of this fluid interaction process has been
analyzed (Ref. 8).
The results of this analysis indicate that the
injectant should provide as large an obstruction as possible to mainstream flow, and should react or decompose with a release of heat or,
in the case of an inert fluid, vaporize and/or dissociate with a minimum amount of heat absorption.
Consequently, the following, and in
some cases conflicting, injectant characteristics are desired:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Low specific heat in liquid and vapor phases


Low boiling point
Low heat of vaporization
High heat of reaction or exothermic decomposition
Low molecular weights of products of combustion or
decomposition
High density (from a packaging standpoint)

RECOMMENDATIONS

In view of the demonstrated performance of bipropellant injection,


further effort should be directed toward the use of monopropellants
and bipropellants as injectants. Various injection techniques which
would enhance the occurrence of chemical reation within the nozzle
are requilred to take full advantage of the injectants' heat of reaction
or decomposition.
Some techniques which could be employed are as
follows: (1) short L* premix or decomposition chambers prior to injection, (2) multiport upstream injection to increase heat transfer and
injectant residencre time, (3) injecting the fluid up..tro...: o an obstruction in the flow to trigger reaction when the fluid passes through
the shock generated by the obstruction, and (4) premixing the injectant
with some by-passed chamber gases.
Constant pressure injection by means of a variable area orifice
may influence system design considerably if only small corrective
forces are required for the major portion of the flight time.
Figure
30 indicates that large savings in injectant weight could be realized
due to the higher performance available during high-velocity, low-flowrate injection.

38

NAVWEPS MEORT

yJ4

Effort should also be directed toward the screening of various


storable high density fluids which may perform well as injectants.
Fluids should be chosen for testing which look promising in light of
the one-dimensional analysis (Ref. 8) and in view of the desirability
of high fluid density.

39

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

REFERENCES
1.

Tfhrust Vectoring Methods, by


U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station.
L. T. Bankston.
China Lake, California, NOTS, 2 December 1958,
(NAVORD Report 6423, NOTS 2123), CONFIDENTIAL.

2.

United Aircraft Corporation, Research Department.


Thnrust Axis
Control of Supersonic Nozzles by Airjet Shock Interference, by
G. F. Hausmann.
Hartford, Conn., 2 May 1952, (Report R-631431-24),
CONFIDENTIAL.

3.

U. S. Naval Air Rocket Test Station. Static Evaluation Tests of'


an Oblique Shock Wave System for Rocket Exhaust Deflection, by
Ml Schulmelster.
Lake Denmark, Dover, New Jersey, December 1955,
(NARTS 77, TED-ARTS-S1-5519), CONFIDENTIAL.

4.

United Aircraft Corporation, Research Department.


Jet Induced
Thrust Vector Control Applied to Nozzles Having Large Expansion
Ratios, by M. K. Schweiger.
Hartford, Conn., 1 March 1957,
(Report R-0937-33), CONFIDENTIAL.

5. Bulletin of the 15th Meeting, JANAF, Solid

Propel
Mrnn

"Thrust Vectoring by Secondary Injection in the Nozzle Exhaust


Cone", by L. T. Bankston and H. M. Larsen. Silver Spring, Md.,
SPIA, Vol. 7, (June 1959), pP. 151-169, CONFIDENTIAL.
6.

U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station.


Thrust Vectoring Experiments:
Gas Injection, by L. T. Bankston and H. M. Larsen.
China Lake,
California., NOTS, 28 May 1959, (NAVORD 6548, NOTS 2247).

7.

Proceedings of the Symposium on BRnlIistic Missile and Space


Technology, "Thrust Vector Control by Secondary Injection", by
Foy McCullough, Jr., Los Angeles, California, STL, Vol. 1,
(August 1959), pp. 1-25, CONFIDENTIAL.

8.

U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station.


Parameters Controlling the
Performance of Secondary Injection, by C. J. Green and C. B. Benham.
China Lake, California, NOTS, (in process), (NAVWEPS 7743, NOTS 2710).

40

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

NOMENCLATURE
A
F
m
Fa
g

Injection port area, in.'


Main thrust, lb.
Side thrust, lb.
Gravitational constant

sp

Specific impulse, se.

Main propellant

flow Jra~re, lb/sc:;,

Secondary2flc-w

-.-'..

Injectant density,

_..

lb/ft3

41

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

TAWLE 1.

Main Thrust,

lb

. .

Nominal LPARM Operating Conditions

.....

3,500

..

1,200

Chamber pressure, psi .....................

Specific impulse, sec

...

Oxidizer to fuel ratio

Epansa"on

ratio

Burning time,

......

.
.

4..

sec

....

...

....

..

lb .....

Specific impulse,

..

see .

% .......

...

. ..

12:1
.

3 to 4

1,115 to

855

237
.

*17.
8.15:1

Expansion ratio ....................

42

..

3,635 to 2,835

...............
.

see

Quarter-Scale SUBROC Motor Charteristics

Burning. time,

200

2.3

..........
...................

Chamber pressure, psi .

Aluminum,

............

TABLE 2.

Main thrust,

.....

35

NAVWEPS REPORT

TABLE 3.

Isp

PC

FM

0/F

LPAIM Data

Fs
8

Wc

7744

Ps

iW8 /W~

Fs/Fm

.0102

Water Injectant - Position 12

191
191
191
191
191

1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200

2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21.

3,420
3,420
3,420
3,420
3,420

17.87
17.87
17.87
1o 87

191

1,200

2.21

3,420

191

1,200

2.21

3,420

.,200-

35
53
68
,3
90

.820
1.340
1.560
1.960

.0459
0750
.0873
.1007
.1097

17.87

3-

2.050

.1_47

.0272

17.87

95

2.230

.1248

.0278

.0699
.0823
.i074
.1371
.1544
.1595

.0115
.0135
.0165
.0218
.0235
.0259

.o864

o162
.0174
0186
.0203
.0212
.0233
.0245
.0263
.0211
.0295

1.800

.0155
.0199
.0243
.0263

Water Injectant - Positions 12 and 16


190
190
190
190
190
190

1,190
1,190
1,190
1,190
1,190
1,190

2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21
2.21

3,400
3,400
3,400
3,400
3,400
3,400

17.87
17.87
17.87
17.87
17.87
17.87

"Water Injectant
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193

1,160
1.,160
1,160
1,160
1,160
1,160
1,160
1,160
1,160
1,160

2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.20

3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390
3,390

17.60
17.60
17.6o
17.60
17.60
17.60
1,.60
17.60
17.60
17.60

39
46
56
74
80
88
-

1.250
1.470
1.920
2.450
2.760
2.850

Positions 12 and 16

55
59
63
69
72

7(9
83
89
92
100

1.520
1.740
1-.960
2.140
2.320
2. 470
2.630
2.720
2.850
3.030

.0989
.1114
.1216
.1318
.1403
1494
.1545
1619
.1722

43

NAVWflS REORT_ 744

TABE 3.

'sp

Pc

oiF

PM

Fs

Perchloroethylene

203
203
203

1,210
1,210
1,210

2.10
2.10
2.10

3,435
3,435
3,435

203

1,210

2.10.

3,4-3

203
203
203

1,210

2.10
2.10
2.10

3,435

1,210

1,210

3,435
3,435

LPARM Data (cont'd.)

16.89
16.89
11.89
16.89
16.89
16.89
16.89

ws

Fs/Fm

Injectant - Position 14

70

.860

90

1.165
1.435
1.550
1.645
1.710
1.740

105

115
120
125
120

605
930

1,305
1,465
1,650
1,765
1,825

.0509
.0690
.0850
.0917
.0973

1010
.1030

.0204
.0262
.0306
.0335
.0349
.0364
.0349

Perchloroethylene Injectant - Position 10


197.5
197.5
197.5
197.5

1,215

2.16

3,445

17.46

125

1.420

1,320

.0813

.0363

1,215
1,215
1,215

2.16
2.16
2.16

3,445
3,445
3,445

17.46
17.46
17.46

130
135
14o

1.545
1.61o
1.74o

1,535
1,650
1,895

.0885
.0922
.0997

.0377
.0392
.0406

Perchioroethylene Injectant - Position 6

200
200

1,200
1,200

2.16
2.16

3,495

200
200
200
200

1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200

2.16
2.16
2.16
2.16

95

1.405
1.505

1,330
1,515

.0805
.0862

.0272
.0272

95
95
100
105

1.580
1.620
1.650
1.66o

1,665
1,745
1,818
i,84o

.0905
.0927
.0955

.0272
.0272
.0286
.0300

.0822
.0872
.0930
.0955
.0972

.0307
.0322
.0337
.0351
.0351

95

3,495

17.46
17.46

3,495
3,495
3,495
3,495

17.46
17.46
17.46
17.46

.0945

Perchloroethylene Injectant - Position 14


190
190
190
190
190

44

1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200

2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28

3,415
3,415
3,415
3,415
3,415

17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89

105
110

115
120
120

1.470
1.560
1.665
1.710
1.740

1,415
1,570
1,760
1,845
1,900

NA6WEPS REPORT t744

TABLE 3.

lop

PC

O/F

FM"

LPAPM Data (cont'd.)

re
s/U

is

IP,,m

Perchloroethylene Injectant - Positions 14 and 10


190

-190
190
190

190
190
190
190
190
190

1,190

2.20.,JAW

-1,190 Z.M28
1,190 2.28

3, 400
3,M00

1,190

2.28

3.400

1,190 2.28
1,19o 2.R8
1.-90 2.28
1,190 2.28
1,19o 2.28
1,190 2.28

3,400
3,,oo
3,400
3,400
3,4OO
3,l4oo

17.89
17.8

.3o

17.o:

17.(+'
17. ;
17.T.
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89

.
.,

145
155
155
160

Perohloroethylene Injectant

188
188
188

188

188
188
188
188
.188
188

1,195
1,195
1,195
1,195
1,195
1,195
1,195
1,195
1,L95

1,195

2.28
2.28
2.28

3,355
3,355

2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28

3,355
3,355

2.28

3,355

3,355
3,1.,5
3,355
3,355

3,355

,,0
"-' 49o
2.640
2.790
2.870
2.870
-

.0220
.0235

.1012
.1224

.0279

636

780
890
965
1,07o
1,145
1,195

.1308
.1392
.1476
.1560
.1609
.16o4

345
1
1:80

.0324
.0368
.0397
.OWm6
.0456
.o456
.o47o

Positions 14 and 10

17.89
17.89
17.89

70 1.130
90 1.510
100 1.810

17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89

130
140
145
150
155
155

17.89

.0676
.0889

2?

120 2.040
2.260
2.420
2.490
2.64o
2.640
2.720

240
360
530

.o632
.o844
.1012

.1140

84o
950
1,005
1,o95
1,145
1,190

.0358w

.1263
.1353
.1392
.1476
.1476
.1520

.0387
.0417
.0432
.0447
.0462
.o462

705

.o209
.0268
.0298

Perchloroethylene Injectant - Positions 14 and 10

195
195
195
.195
195
195
195
195
195

1,200 2.16
1,200 2.16

3,405
3,405

17.46
17.46

70 1.210
80 1.510

260
320(

.o693
.0865

.0206
.0235

1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,20W0
1,2C0

3,405
3,405
3,405
3,405
3,405
3,p405
3,405

17.46
17.46
17.46
17.46
17.46
17.46
17.46

85
95

385
495
565
640

.0865

.0250

.1037
.1122

.o279

2.16
2.16
2.16
2.16
2.16
2.1f:
2.16

105
115
130
135
145

1.510
1.81o
1.960
1.960
2.260
2.340
2.490

755

900
980

.1122
.1294
.1340

.0308
.0338
.0382

0396
.026
c.1266

45

------

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

TABLE 3.

sp

PC

O/F

Wc

Fm

Perchloroethylene

LPARM Data (cont'd.)

Fs

1,200

2.16

3,405

17.46

150

195
195

1,200
1,200

2.A6
2.16

3,405
3,405

17.46
17.46

155
160

Perchloroethylene

1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180

2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23

3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445

P5

Ws/Wc

Fs/Fm

Injectant - Positions 14 and 10 (cont'd.)

195

191
191
191
191
191
191
191

Ws

18.03
18.03
18.03
18.03
18.03
18.03
18.03

2.640

1,O90

.1512

.o441

2. 7 20
2.790

1,170
1,194

.1558
.1598

.0455
.0470

.1038
.1210
.1335
.1405
.1460
.1520
.1590

.0276
.0333
.0392
.n435
.0450

Injectant - Position 12

95
115
135
150
155
155
165

1.870
2.1-85
2.405
2.530
2.630
2.74o
2.870

475

585
670
725
765

820
880

.0450
.0479

Perchloroethylene Injectant - Position 16

198
198
198

1,180 2.16
1,180 2.16
1,180 2.1.6

3,455
3,455
3,455

17.46
17.46
17.46

T0 1.005

285

.0576

.0203

80
95

1.535
1.925

385

.0880

.0232

485

.1100

.0275

198

1,180

2.16

3,455

17.46

100

2.200

570

.1260

.0289

198
198
198
198

1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180

2..16
2.16
2.16
2.16

3,455
3,455

115
125
135
140

2.390
2.610
2.650
2.790

635
705
735
790

z1370

3,455
3.455

17.46
17.46
17.46
17.46

.1495
.1520
.1600

.0333
.0362
.0391
.0405

198
198

1,180
1,180

2.16
2.16

3,455
3,455

17.46
17.46

145
145

2.870
2.940

825
855

.1645
.1685

.0420.0420

730
960

.1180
.1405

.0460
.0470

Freuon-12 - Position 12
200
200

46

1,190
1,190

3,485
3,485

17.42
17.42

160
165

2.060
2.450

NAVWIES RFPORT 7744

TABLE
sp

3.

Fm

LPARM Data (cont Id.)


Fe
8

PS

'W/

Fs/Fm

.0440
.0470

1,045

.1225
.1375
.1468

430
800
880
1,01O

.06892
.1225
.1280
.1370

.0136
.0141
.o147
.0155

530
630
710
780
840
90.10
1,000

.0970
.1070
.1140
.1200
.1250
.1380

.0310
.0335
.0352
.0360
.0372
3
.0394

430
500
550
610
660
710
76o
790
830
86o
890

.0788
.0890
.0958
.1035
.1090
.1145
.1195
.1225
.1275
.1295
.1315

Freom-12 - Position 12

200
200
200

1,200
1:200
1,200

3,515

17.57

3,515
3,515

17.57
17.57

155

2.150
165. 2.410
175 2.580

780
935

.0498

Freon-12 - Positfon 4

202
202
202
202

1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200

2.18
2.18
2.18
2.18

3,540
3,540
3,540
3,540

17.50
17.50
17.50
17.50

Freon-12

200
200
200
200
200
200
200

1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180

2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23

3,550
3,550
3,550
3,550
3,550
3,,550
3,550

201

1,200

2.23

1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200

2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23

3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,56o
3,560

3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560

17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75

Freon-12

201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201

48
50
52
55

Position 8

110
119
125
128
132
137

14o
-

1.56o
2.140
2.240
2.400

1.720
1.895
2.020
2.130
2.210
2.360
2.440

Position 12

17.75

loo 1.4oo

17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75

110
124
138
148
154
160
164
167
170
171

1.580
1.700
1.835
1.930
2.030
2.120
2.170
2.260
2.300
2.330

.0281
.0309
.0348
.0388

.o416
.0432
.0449
.0461
.0469
.0478
.0480

47

1XAVWEPS na'0nuT 7744

TAMLE 3.

Ip

PC

0/F

FM

Freon-12

201
201
201
201
201
201

1,200
1,200
1,o2o
1,200
1,200
1,200

2.23 3,560
2.23 3,560
2.23
3,560
2.23
3,560
2.P3. 3,56o
2.23
3,560

LPARM4 Data (cont'd.)

17.75
17.75
'17.75
17.75
17.75
17.75

F5 /Fm

P/wCw
-

Position 12 (cont'd.)

173
176
180.
180
180
183

2.370
2.40
2.500
2.550
2.58o
2.64o

.1335

.0486
.0494

910
950
990
1,O20
1,o4o
1,08o

.1375
.1410
1.1435
.1450
\1487

505
615
720
810
880
975
1,035
1,09o

.0970
.1085
.1205
.1305
.1375
.1465
.1520
.1565

.0311
.0382
.O48
.0470,
.ox48o
.0495
.0510
.0510

320
420

.o548
.o76

.0225
.0272

.0506

.0506
.05o6
.0514

Freon-12 - Position 12

210
210
210
210
2
210
210
210

S210

1,205
1,205
1,205
1,205
.
1,205
1,205
1,205
1,2o5

2.15
2.15
2.15
2.15
2.15
2.15
2.15
2.15
,-

3,535
3,535

3,535

3,535
3,535

3,535
3,535
3,535

16.86
16.86
16.86
16.86
16.86
16.86
16.86
16.86

110
135
155
165
170
17!r
180
180

1.585.
1.830
2.030
2.200
2.320
2.47o
2.560
2.64o

Freon-12 - Position 16

208
208

1,2oo
1,2O0

2.14
2.14

3,6oo
3,l6

17.25
17.25

81
98

208

1,200

2.14

3,600

17.25

113

1.560

r-0

.oqo4

.0314

208
208
0od
208
208
208
.208
208
208
208

1,200
1,200
i,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1 ,200
1,200
1,200

2.14
2.14
2.14
2.14
2.14
2.14
2.14
2.1h
2.14
2.14

3,600
3,6oo
3,6oo
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600
3,600

17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25
17.25

125
137
146
.153
155
155
157
157
159
159

1.800
2.010
2.170
2.280
2.390
2.490
2.530
2.570
2.610
2.030

61o
710
790
850
910
970
1,000
1,030
1,050
1,O6O

.1o45
.1165
.126o
.1325
.1385
.1445
.1465
.1490
.1510
.1525

.o347
.0380
.x406
.o425
.o430
.o430
.0436
.0o436
.0442
.o442

1.8

.945
1.310

NAYVWEPS MEPOR!

44

TABLE 3. LPARM Data (cont'd.)

Isp

PC

O/F

Fm

Wc

F.5

PS

W8 /Wc

Fs/Fm

930
1,340
1,470

.0622
.0781
.0826

.0256
.0299
.0299

88o
1,030
1,150

.o466

.02(6

.05i4
.0549

.0301
.0323

.0687

.0240

Freon-12 - Position 14

199
199
199

1,185
1,185
1,185

2.23
2.23
2.23

3,515
3,515
3,515

17.67
L1.67
17.67
Freon-12

201
201
201

1,160
1,160
1,160

2.18
2.18
2.18

3,520
3,520
3,520

17.50
17.50
17.50

90
105
105
-

1.10
1.38
1.46

Position 10

97
106
113

.815
.900
.960

201

11,'40

2.16

Freon-12 - Positions 6 and 10


3,44o
17.12
81 1.175
340

201
201
201

1,140
1,14o
1,140

2.16
2.16
2.16

3,440
3,44u
3,440

17.12
17.12
17.12

92
97
103

1.375
1.485
1.590

420
470
520

.0804
.0930

.0270
.0280
.0300

20

1,140

2.16

3,440

17.12

1i0

1.670

201
201
201
201
201
201

56o

1,140
1,140
1,140
1,140
1,140
1,140

2.16
2.16
2.26
2.16
2.16
2.16

.0975

.0320

3,440
3,440
3,440
3,440
3,440
3,440

17.12
17.12
17.120
17.12
17.12
17.12

114
119
2k
127
130
135

1.755
1.810
1.880
1.945
1.990
2.100

610
640
680
720
750
820

.1025
.i060
.1100
.1137
.1163
.1227

.0330
.0350
.036o
.0370
.0380
.0400

.o868

Freon-12 - Positions 14 and 10

202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202

1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170

2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13
2.13

3,395
3,395
3,395
3,395
3,395
3,395
3,395
3,395
3,395

16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82

110
120
130
135
140
150
155
165
170

1.450
1.590
1.720
1.830
1.930
2.000
2.120
2.400
2.46o

580
655
74o
810
880
930
1,020
1,255
1,310

.0862
.0945
.1022
.1090
.1150
.1190
.1260
.1427
.1462

.0324
.0353

.0383
.0398
.0412
.0442
.0457
.0486
.0500

49

NAVWEPS REPORT 77 4 4

TABLE 3.

Isp

Pc

0/F

Fm

LPARM Data (cont'd..)

FS

Wc

8s

P8

'ss/c

Fs/Fm

1,500
1,705
1,800

.0787
.0849
.0875

.0312
.0327
.0342

1,365
1,535
1,600
1,650
1,690
1,740
1,775

.0734
.0785
.0805
.0820
.0832
.0843
.0855

.0292
.0322
.0322
.0336
.0336
.0351
.0336

385

.0704
.0811

.0260
.0290
.0320
0 4'1'
.0408
.0450
.0o494
.c494
.0524

Freon-12 - Position 14

199
199
199

1,290
1,290
1,290

2.10
2.10
2.10

3,365
3,365
3,365

16.89
16.89
16.89

105
lO
115

1.330
1.435
1.480

Freon-12 - Position 14

197
197
197
197
197
197
197

1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170
1,170

2.22
2.22
2.22
2.22
2.22
2.22
2.22

3,420
3,1420
3,420
3,420
3,420
3,420
3,420

17.32
17.32
17.32
17.32
17.32
17.32
17.32

Freon-12

185
185

1,185
1,185

2.28
2.28

185

1,185

2.28

185
185
185
185
185
185

1,185
1,185
1,185
1,185
1,185
1,185

2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28

3,435

3,435
3,435
3,435
3,435
3,435
3,435
3,435
3,435

50

1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180
1,180

2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23
2.23

3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445
3,445

18.60
18.60

90
1i0
125
14o
155
170
170
180

18.60
18.60
18.60
18.60
18.6o
18.60

17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89
17.89

1.270
i.360
1.395
1.420.
1.440
1.460
1.480

Position 12

100

18.6o

Freon-12

193
193
193
193
193
193
193

100.
110
110
115
115
120
115

1.310
1.510
1.650
1.770
1.970
2.170
2.280
2.380
2.590

455
510
560
650
750
815
870
1,000

.0888

410
480
545
610
685

.0780
.0888
.965
.1065
.1150
.1235
.1365

.0952
.1060
.1165
.1225
.1280
.1395

PosiiLlon 12

90
100
115
130
145
160
170

1.395
1.590
1.725
1.905
2.060
2.210
2.440

760
895

.0260
.0290
.0320
.0364

.0408
,0450
.0494

NAVWEPS

TABL

Isp

PC

0/F

Fm

MORT 7744

3. LPARM Data (cont'd.)

rc

Fs
e

Ps

Ws/Wc

Fs/Fm

Freon-12 - Position
12 (cont'd.)

193
193

1,180
1,180

2.23
2.23

3,445
3,445

17.89
17.89

180

180

2.590
2.650

980
1,020

.1450
.1480

.0494
.0524

1.263

400

.0690

.0227

1.330

400

.0727

.0239

Freon-12.
Position 16

190

1,160

2.27

3,470

18. 29

79

Position 12

190

1,160

2.27

3,470

18.20

83

Position 8

190
190

1,160
1,160

2.27
2.27

3,470

18.20

1.263

4oo

.o69o

.0202

3,470

Position 4
18.20
56 1.280

4O0

.0700

.0102

70

Freon-12

192

1,150

2.21

3,400

Position 16
17.72
68
Position 12

.816

225

.0460

.0200

192

1,150

2.21

3,400

17.72

.900

225

.0507

.0200

.910

225

.0513

.0194

.916

225

.0517

.0191

.726

4oO

.o394

.0185

.745

100

.0403

.0193

.76o

4oo

.o412

.0193

.727

4OO

o0394

.0144

192

1,150

2.21

3,400

192

1,150

2.21

3,400

68

Position 8
17.72
66
Position 4
17.72
65
Freon-12

188

2.26

3,470

188

2.26

3,470

188

2.26

3,470

188

2.26

3,470

Position 14
18. 46
64
Position 10
18.46
67
Position 6
18.46
64
Position 2
18.46
50

51

NAVwzps REPoRT 7744

TABLE 3.

Isp

Pc

O/F

Fr

LPARM Data (cont'd.)

FS

P8

1s/Ic

Fs/Fm

350

.0444

.0196

640

.0503

.0243

660

.o605

.0262

.0244

.0139

.0885

.0408

.1100

.0514

Freon-12 - Position 10
194

1,190

2.17

17.62

3,420

67

.782

Freon-12 - Position 1^

186

1,190

2.24

3,420

18.36

.924

83

Freon-12 - Position 10

191

1,190

2.25

3,48o

18.27

91

1.105

Freon-12 - Position 10

187.5 1,180 2.28

3,460

18.44

48

Bromine Injectant

189

1,190

2.27

3,48o

18.47

52

],170

2.33

3,460

18.82

Position 10

142 1.630

Bromine Injectant

184

.450

178

770

Position 10

2.070

1,150

NAVWKPs ERPoIT 7744+

TABLE 3.

PC

0/F

FM

UJDMH and IRFNA


192.5

2.32

192

2.32

192

2.32

Sec.0/F

F.
-

3,580

UDMH and IRFNA

192

LPARM Data (cont'd.)

Fa/Fm

Bi-propellant Injector Number 3


18.60

WS/Wc

230

2.200

2.230

.1185

.0643

.0709

Bi-propell at Injector Number 3


Early

3,500

18.37

248

2.300

2.430

.1255

3,500

Late
18.37
235

2.160

1.9OO

.1175 .0671

UDMH and IRFNA - Bi-propellant Injector Number 2


201

1,180

2.15

3,590

17.86

222

2.060

3.800

.1155

.0608

.0913

.0453

.1320
.1310

.0627
.0658

.1345

.0758

.0925

.452

UDMH and IRFNA - Bi-propellant Injector Number 2


197

1,200

2.21

3,490

17.72

158

1.620

2.520

UDMH and IRFNA - Bi-propellant Injector Number 3


199.5
199.5

1,200
1,200

2.26
2.26

3,620
3,620

18.17
18.17

227
238

2.400
2.380

1.240
1.275

UDMH and IRFNA - Bi-propellant Injector Number 3


191

1,140

2.27

3,430

18.00

260

2.420

1.265

UDMH and IRFNA - Bi-propellant Injector Number 3


192

2.28

3,500

18.37

158

1.700

0.975

53

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

TABLE 4.

Freon-12 Injectant
237
237
237
237
237
237
237
237
237
237
237
237
237

1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055
1,055

- 855
- 855
_ 855
- 855
- 855.
- 855
- 855
- 855
- 855
- 855
- 855
- 855
- 855

3,325
3,305
3,305
3,305
3,265
3,265
3,265
3,205
2,960
2,980
2,960
2,900
2,835

237
237
237
237
237
237

54

1,100
1,100
1,100
1,100
1,100
1,0oo
1,100
1,100
,100
1,1I00
1,100
1,1OO

950
950
950
950
950
95o
950
950
950
950
950
950

3,510
3,510
3,470
3,450
3,430
3, 390
3,390
3,205
3,145
3,115
3,060
2,980

4.81
14.81
14.64
14.56
14.47
1.4.30
14.30
13.52
13.27
13.14
12.91
12.57

Wa/Wc

Fs/Fm

.1329
.1308
.1297
.128o
.1281
.1274
.1259
.1265
'.1153
.1111
.1101
.1115
.1120

.0547
.0536
.0526
.0514
.o514
.0487
.0481

.1546
.1512
.1489
.1472
.1465
.1455
.1427
.1198
.1183
.1164
.1170
.1201

.0504
.0484
.0476
.0467
.0446
.0437

Three Radial Orifices


182
177
'74
170
168
159
157
152
145
145
145
142
138

14.03
13.95
13.95
13.95
13.78
13.78
13.78
13.52
12.49
12.56
12.49
12.24
11.96

Freon-12 In-ectant
237
237
237
237
237
237

Ps

Fs

Isp

Quarter-Scale SUBROC Data

1.865
1.825
1.810
1.785
1.765
1.755
1.735
1.710
1.440
1.395
1.375
1.365
1.340

Three Parallc
177
170
165
161
153
148
135
131
125
116
112
109

2.29
2.24
2.18
2.15
2.12
2.08
2.04
1.82
1.57
1.53
1.51
1.51

525
500
495
48o
470
465
455
440
450
430
410
395
395

.o4(4
.0490
.0487
.0490
.0490
.0487

Orificec
695
665
635
615
600
585
550
45Q
430
410
395
395

.o398
.0409
.0397
.0372
.0366
.0366

NAVWEPS RVORT 77I4

TABLE 4.

Isp

PC
0

FM

Quarter-Scale SUBROC Data (cont'd.)

Fs

Ws

Ps

"Ws/Wc

Fs/Fm

Freon-12 Injectant - Single Orifice

237
237
237

1,115
1,115
1,115
1,115

3,635
3, 675
3,635
3,590

15.34
15.50
15.34
15.15

?37

1,115

3,610

!237

1,115

3,590

211
202

2.48
2.35
2.23
2.23

925
820
780
765

.1617
.1516
.1454
.1472

.0622
.0585
.0580
.0563

15.23

196

2.17

745

.1425

.0543

15.15

196'

2.17

730

.1432

.0546

1,005
925
885
845
815

.1831
.3792
.1772
.1746
.1726

.0814
.0795
.0789
.0784
.0784

N2 0 4 Injectant

237
237
237
237

1,115
1,115
123
1,115
1,115
1,115

3,635
3,635
3,600
3,570
3,,570

15.34
15.34
15.12
15.06
15.06

226

2315

Single Orifice

296
289
284
280
280

2.81
2.75
2.68
2.63
2.60

55

NAVWEPS REPORT 7744

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION

28 Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons

CS (W)
DLI-31 (2)
DMP-33 (1)
FwEW (i)

FWWS-3 (1)
r-i

(i"

ThAi;-. (i)
;piQ

(I)

ia-i (i)
I-3
R- 35 (1)
(1)
RMP (1)
RNMP-12 (i)
RMw-2 (M)
RMKP-24 (1)

RI4MP-33 (i)
RMMz-4 (1)
RH-MI42 (i)

M-221 (1)

RRRE (1 )
RRRE-5 (1)

RT (1)
RUME-li (1)
3 Special Projects Office
Sp-20 (1)

Sp-27 (1)
Sp-271 (1)

5 Chief of Naval Operations


Deputy Chlef for Air (1)
Operations Evaluation Group (1)
2 Chief of Naval Research
1
I
1
1
1
1

Code 104 (1)


Code 46, (1)

AssLftant Secretary of the Navy (Material) (W. H. Moore)


Fleet Anti-Air Warfare Training Center, San Diego (Guided Missile section)
Naval Air Force, Atlantic Fleet
Naval Air Force, Pacific Fleet
Naval Air Material Center, Philadelphia
Naval Air Test Center, Patuxent River (Aeronautical Publications

Library)
56

a4)
0
--

.rA

4.)

U)

+3-

43

44 4

frVI

Vt.-

04

40 Nm0

-Pri494

Ur4

Of

'-40

4v
co

HH

+)

dt

0 0I .,raI+

(kwV

9.

oo;

4-W 4 4

I404i

brf-to s
2

to

0 rd

+3
cr.

00
43

0~

-n

00d)

50-r

0~S--t

cc

H!

t-'0 4-

+1W~
49U

04
a)b)4G
ow-

.1444

.0

0r

ZiH

E-

202-

ZU

Vrd 0

0'n , 4

f-40)4

0Z

4-1 r-g4
>0

+3, "

00
JtH

00 4) 4+)e-ri
14 -H+3&D00 d)
r,4
5410
Q'4)l
60r4j

0)0

- Ir

)--

0014

V'

V:

).

Vt

0 .

jg

4K 0+

-R

0r0)-,

4)4

VI

C
H)
0

m H

)f

06
)rd

rO

04A
-HlW~
r(2)7310

Git0id00
4 4)

C4 H

0r.

to

44r4-

~ 4
~0H
4 rd
$R

+' Vo

0 44gH,
:>aCW
~ d
0r
i4P
dn
A
C
Vk5
4

0o ,2
R
4

.2
>d Hk

4'1
0

+'
0~

0 L)0 4)rg 0

43

,1

ot ow
rq
;r
- (Uw4

50
a

r- 0

o -P

PU*d

0O

U)

Pd
[4

(U

-r4
4-) rd

544
1

3~-ri

W
94)

-r4
Ur-

~ MIH ~:4-

0)4)w-IZ04)W
O-

r4

J 0 j~

W
X

~
4

4-i

00)W+)+

0.4

XA

Hr

904d4
4

-,f

s::

fl+''d4
'd&4-

P4 q

10

P 4J
.13
*dC 0

0)

22

++

4-

0,

r
4-,
b004-s

) iu
rC)

4)O

9P

i-.

W 4-)

a) ca4-5 -

0CCq

H)

3rdr4
'Ci

D
D

H44

r:'
-i(D4

-Wr~t
i

14 .0.
r

- Hrd9r-

4z4
(flO-t

0)fAW0
Q-PQ A Dr
04 40.
bf I~i4- d kUHC

)wdR

V.nOOkG)
31
4--lQ4-Hd1
HWU,014

'4'41+)04-cO
CO
Cr-44r'1td
l()
0,W (

rd+'t4

Ij

V
c

+2r14a+
a)+
L

4-3d1-,0000-41)

q4

n)
4-)

0 4)0A0

14

d4 HC:P

h-zt
49

~~~ri~~
a)!H0
~:9~ ~

cn-+

4-r4,C4-i0"iA

Ird

-t

0 )
Cgi

4)"
0
i Cfl

0 4ci-d0*d

04-3

r.

--t

'ii 14
r42+)

0I W
(4-,
;

H)

rj4"'

4-3t.r1

to-*r

O4iNOO 0 )pi+
0()
H'' j41k
H'10
- 0a) Pir4+

-i*H

+3
W

0144'd
0(22
WP4H
NrC +')C

+-90041

01

W0*H

H9 0

a)

ri

41

d014-+D'd4'i00,
N) Z1+'
to Ur+
0
0
L. +0i

aj

1H

0 4-'k

0+'

hlt

040

4)

4--

jl4

C) U4 U

43R1-I0N ? $ 4W
od41ydtoAVprC

NA44+

3-4

r-4 d)

Ad VG
0 0

00sg

:wl
drtai

6)

03

krOtPS 3i]Z0
r
,
04-'
-Pm

U t-''

. 4-)

e) cu
0 -H

03N0

-4

rdP

0t
KP
4 +'3
1)
00w
r

0t 4) 4

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFRIED

También podría gustarte