Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas
Ephoreia of Palaeoanthropology-Speleology of Southern Greece, Ardittou 34b, Athens 116 36, Greece
b
Department of Biology, University of Haifa, Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel
c
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Research Group for Palaeoecological and Geoarchaeological Studies,
Department of Prehistory, Ancient History and Archaeology, University of Barcelona, c/ Baldiri Reixac, s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
d
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31e34 Gordon Square, London WC 1H OPY, UK
e
Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
f
Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received 7 May 2006; received in revised form 22 September 2006; accepted 20 October 2006
Abstract
The phytolith record from archaeological strata is a powerful tool for reconstructing aspects of past human behaviour and ecology. Considerable insights into the problems and potentials of this record can be obtained by studying phytoliths in modern plants. We prepared a phytolith
reference collection of modern plants mostly from northern Greece that includes quantitative information on phytolith concentrations (number of
phytoliths per gram dry organic material) and morphological assemblages. Here we analyse this reference collection with the aim of evaluating
the strengths and weaknesses of the archaeological phytolith record. The reference collection comprises 62 different plant taxa. Of them, 28 are
trees, 1 conifer, 10 shrubs and 1 herb, 3 domesticated annual legumes and 19 monocotyledons. We demonstrate quantitatively the extent to which
woody species, legumes and fruits of dicots contribute only small amounts of phytoliths to the sediments per unit tissue dry weight, while leaves
of trees and shrubs produce significant amounts of phytoliths and grasses are prolific phytolith producers. We compare the data of this reference
collection with a similar reference collection from another Mediterranean ecosystem (Israel). The comparison indicates that some aspects of
phytolith production are probably genetically controlled, whereas others are environmentally controlled. We note that despite the fact that woody
species produce few phytoliths per gram of tissue, their record can be most informative when taking into account other properties of the
sediments. We also note that jigsaw puzzle-shaped phytoliths normally form in plants that grow in humid conditions, but may form in arid
environments when the plants are irrigated. This study clearly shows the extent to which some plants can be under-represented and others
over-represented in the phytolith record. Knowing the extent of this bias can greatly improve our interpretation of the phytolith record.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Phytoliths; Quantitative reference collection; Greece; Plant microfossils; Archaeobotany
1. Introduction
Plants are an important component of the archaeological
record. Only the charred remains of the plants themselves
1263
1264
Fig. 1. Map of Greece. The areas from which the plants of the reference collection have been collected are shown (Thrace, Argolid, Boeotia).
1265
Table 1
List of all the plants collected from Greece for phytolith analysis
Latin name
Family
English name
Provenance
Woody plants
Acer monospessulanum
Alnus glutinosa
Arbutus adrachne
Carpinus betulus
Celtis australis
Corylus avelana
Crataegus sp.
Fagus sylvatica
Ficus carica
Fraxinus ornus
Juglans regia
Juniperus oxycedrus
Olea europaea
Phillyrea latifolia
Pistacia terebinthus
Populus alba
Prunus amygdalus
Prunus avium
Pyrus amygdaliformis
Quercus coccifera
Quercus frainetto
Quercus petraea
Quercus pubescens
Salix sp.
Sambucus nigra
Sorbus torminalis
Tamarix sp.
Tilia sp.
Vitex agnus castus
Aceraceae
Betulaceae
Ericaceae
Betulaceae
Ulmaceae
Corylaceae
Rosaceae
Fagaceae
Moraceae
Oleaceae
Juglandaceae
Cupressaceae
Oleaceae
Oleaceae
Anacardiaceae
Salicaceae
Rosaceae
Rosaceae
Rosaceae
Fagaceae
Fagaceae
Fagaceae
Fagaceae
Salicaceae
Caprifoliaceae
Rosaceae
Tamaricaceae
Tiliaceae
Verbenaceae
Maple
Black alder
Strawberry tree
Hornbean
Nettle tree
Hazelnut
Hawthorn
Beech
Fig tree
Manna ash
Walnut
Juniper
Olive tree
Basswood
Terebinth
White poplar
Almond tree
Wild cherry
Wild pear
Kermes oak
Hungarian oak
Durmast oak
Downy oak
Willow
Common elder
Wild service tree
Tamarisk
Lime
Chaste tree
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
M
M
M
M
C
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
C
P
P
M
C
M
M
P
M
M
M
M
M
M
P
M
P
Cichoriaceae
Ephedraceae
Euphorbiaceae
Solanaceae
Rhamnaceae
Hypolepidaceae
Rosaceae
Labiatae
Labiatae
Urticaceae
Vitaceae
Chicory
Ephedra
Spurge
Tobacco
Christs thorn
Fern
Blackberry
Sage
Thyme
Stinging nettle
Grape-vine
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
M
C
M
M
P
M
M
M
M
M
M
Leguminoseae
Leguminoseae
Leguminoseae
Chickpea
Lentil
Faba bean
Boeotia P
Boeotia P
Boeotia P
Monocotyledons
Aegilops sp.
Arundo sp.
Briza maxima
Bromus sp.
Cynodon dactylon
Dactylis glomerata
Hynaldia villosa
Lagurus ovatus
Lolium sp.
Melica sp.
Phleum sp.
Polypogon monspeliensis
Stipa bromoides
Juncus sp.
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Juncaceae
Thrace M
Boeotia P
Argolid P
Thrace M
Thrace M
Thrace M
Argolid P
Attika P
Thrace M
Thrace M
Thrace M
Thrace M
Thrace M
Argolid P
Hare tail
Ryegrass
Melick grass
Cats tail
Beard grass
Needle grass
Rush
1266
Table 1 (continued )
Latin name
Family
English name
Provenance
Domesticated cereals
Avena sativa
Hordeum vulgare
Secale cereale
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Gramineae
Oats
Barley
Rye
Bread wheat
Corn
Thrace M
Boeotia P
Thrace M
Thrace M
Thrace M
The provenance is shown: M, mountain; C, coastal plain; P, plain at the foot of the mountain.
1267
Table 2
Plant reference collections from Israel and Greece
Israel collection
Greek collection
Species
Provenance
Plan part
Phyt. gram
dry material
Species
Provenance
Plant part
Phyt. gram
dry material
Avena sterilis
Avena sterilis
Avena sterilis
Lagurus ovatus
Lagurus ovatus
Lagurus ovatus
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum
Cynodon dactylon
Arundo donax
Arundo donax
Lens culinaris
Salix acmophylla
Salix acmophylla
Salix acmophylla
Pistacia palaestina
Pistacia palaestina
Pistacia palaestina
Crataegus aronia
Crataegus aronia
Olea europaea
Olea europaea
Olea europaea
Olea europaea
Amygdalus communis
Amygdalus communis
Amygdalus communis
Ephedra foemina
Ficus Carica
Ficus Carica
Quercus calliprinos
Quercus calliprinos
Quercus calliprinos
Quercus ithaburensis
Quercus ithaburensis
Quercus ithaburensis
Quercus ithaburensis
Quercus ithaburensis
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Tel-Dor
Mt Carmel
(Northern Tanzania)
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Mt Carmel
Leaves
Stem
Inflorescence
Leaves
Stem
Inflorescence
Whole plant
Inflorescence
Inflorescence
Whole plant
Whole plant
Stem
Sheath
Whole plant
Wood
bark
Leaves
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Wood
Leaves
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Fruits
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Branches
Leaves
Fruits
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Husk acorn
Caps
7,000,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
40,000
400,000
700,000
400,000
400,000
1,500,000
5,000,000
500,000
2,000,000
1000
5
1000
9000
4
71
11,000
7
2000
11
54
1000
8
9
2000
3000
11,000
1,000,000
100,000
23
9000
11,000
100
600
12,000
20
6000
Avena sterilis
Thrace
Culm/leaves
Avena sterilis
Lagurus ovatus
Thrace
Attika
Inflorescence
Culm/leaves
2,000,000
7,000,000
Lagurus ovatus
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum
Cynodon dactylon
Attika
Boeotia
Boeotia
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Inflorescence
Culm/leaves
Inflorescence
Husk
Culm/leaves
Whole plant
7,600,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,100,000
Arundo sp.
Lens culinaris
Salix sp.
Salix sp.
Salix sp.
Pistacia terebinthus
Pistacia terebibthus
Pistacia terebinthus
Crataegus sp.
Crataegus sp.
Olea europaea
Olea europaea
Olea europaea
Olea europaea
Prunus amygdalus
Prunus amygdalus
Prunus amygdalus
Ephedra altissima
Ficus carica
Ficus carica
Quercus frainetto
Quercus frainetto
Quercus frainetto
Quercus pubescence
Quercus pubescence
Quercus pubescence
Quercus pubescence
Quercus coccifera
Quercus coccifera
Quercus coccifera
Quercus coccifera
Quercus petraea
Quercus petraea
Quercus petraea
Boeotia
Boeotia
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Thrace
Stem/sheath
Whole plant
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Wood
Leaves
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Fruits (pulp)
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Whole plant
Leaves
Fruits
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Acorns
Wood
Bark
Leaves
Acorns
Wood
Bark
Leaves
1,500,000
200
0
700
2000
1
800
11,000
2
6000
160
200
40,000
20
100
800
60,000
11,000
1,000,000
100,000
35
3000
200,000
3
5000
1,000,000
300,000
9
200
20,000
2000
100
5000
500,000
600,000
The list contains the plants that belong to at least the same genus and the specific parts of the plants analysed, showing the number of phytoliths per gram dry
material.
1268
Fig. 2. Number of phytoliths per gram dry weight of all the plants analysed from Greece; (a) wood, (b) bark, (c) edible parts of dicots (fruits, nuts, legumes), (d)
leaves and flowers of trees and herbaceous plants and (e) monocotyledons.
1269
3.4. Monocotyledons
Monocotyledons are, as expected, the major phytolith
producers in this region. Almost all species analysed produce
over half a million phytoliths/gram. The stems of four species
(Avena sativa, Briza maxima, Phleum sp. and Secale cereale)
(Fig. 2e) produce no more than 700,000 phytoliths /g of dry
plant material. The largest amounts of phytoliths are present
in wild grasses (Polypogon monspeliensis, Phleum sp., Lagurus ovatus, Stipa bromoides, Bromus sp.) that produce from
6 to 12 million phytoliths/g. The cereals that produce the largest amounts of phytoliths are Triticum aestivum and Secale
cereale. Their inflorescences contain approximately 4 million
phytoliths/g of dry plant.
Another archaeologically important parameter is the relative amounts of phytoliths in the inflorescence of grasses
compared to the culm/leaves fraction of the same plant. Inflorescence produces more phytoliths than culms and leaves
(Piperno, 1988). In general, we observed the same pattern,
but with exceptions (Hordeum vulgare and Aegilops sp.)
(Fig. 3). We also noted that in some plants (Polypogon monspeliensis, Secale cereale, Arundo sp., Stipa bromoides,
Phleum sp.) the differences between the inflorescence and
culm/leaves phytolith production are very large.
In general, the morphological classification of grass phytoliths in this collection is in agreement with published data. The
dominant types are the short-cells, long-cells, and groupings of
these within articulated phytoliths (silica skeletons), as was
noted also by Albert (2000) and Rosen (1992). The short cells
are distributed between the following sub-families according
to the classification by Twiss et al. (1969); rondels are produced by C3 festucoid grasses (cereals, Bromus sp., Melica
sp., etc.), saddles are produced by C4 chloridoid grasses (Cynodon dactylon), bilobes by panicoid and arundinoid grasses
(Zea mays, Arundo sp.) and crosses are present in the only
panicoid grass of this collection (Zea mays).
There are however some common morphotypes, such as
crenates (trapeziforms sinuates and polylobates) that are
mainly produced in festucoid grasses but have been also found
in Cynodon dactylon (in lower amounts though, only 3%).
It is worth noting the predominance of C3 grasses in the
Rhodope mountains. This is consistent with the cool wet
conditions that are the favourable regions for these grasses
(Abrantes, 2003).
The inflorescence of wild grasses and cereals has some
different phytolith morphological characteristics (Rosen,
1992). As far as silica skeletons from husks are concerned,
Rosen (1992) noticed that the size and width of the wave of
the long cells walls, as well as the frequency and the attributes
of the papillae and the shape of the cork cells, can be used to
identify a specific grass genus or even species. This is consistent with observations made using this collection. The attributes Rosen described for Triticum as well as Hordeum and
Avena are identical with those observed in the same species
in this collection, and they are distinct from the wild species.
Rye (Secale cereale), a cereal not included in her analysis,
shows great similarities with barley; thick cell walls, squarish
1270
Fig. 3. Amounts of phytoliths per gram dry weight in the inflorescence and culm/leaves of grasses analysed from Greece.
3.6. Contamination
While studying the different parts of the plants we noted
that phytoliths from one plant type can contaminate other
plants. The fact that these phytoliths are intrusive and not an
integral part of the parent cell morphology was confirmed
by spodograms, i.e., a chemical preparation procedure
whereby the cytoplasmic content of plant material is removed
and epidermal layers are detached in order to observe the plant
epidermis with phytoliths in situ (Kaplan et al., 1992). Albert
(2000) adopted a similar approach using thin sections of the
inner bark of her tree collection to differentiate between
phytoliths formed in the bark from those derived from contamination. Spodograms prepared for dicotyledonous leaves and
monocotyledons (Figs. 5, 6) clearly show which phytoliths
form in situ, such as the long cells in monocotyledons and
the polyhedral and tracheids in dicot leaves.
Fig. 7 is a plot of the average number of contaminating
phytoliths in each plant category. In estimating these values
we excluded the species for which we counted less than 50
consistent morphology phytoliths due to the lack of reliability
of the results. We noted that grasses show no contamination
from other plant material. In contrast, wood/bark shows the
highest contamination (49% are phytoliths characteristic of
grasses and dicot leaves), while dicot flowers and leaves
have the lowest (0.5% and 2% respectively). Albert et al.
(2003) found that the contamination of wood/bark by grass
phytoliths was around 30%.
3.7. Comparison with the Albert and Weiner
(2001) reference collection
Table 2 shows the numbers of phytoliths per gram where
the same part of the plant from the same species or at least genus was analysed in the reference collection from Mt. Carmel
and the adjacent coastal area in Israel and the reference collection from central and northern Greece. We note that the numbers of phytoliths per gram of the woody taxa are similar in
1271
Fig. 4. Average ratios of variable to consistent morphology (v/c) phytoliths in the different plant categories analysed from Greece.
and Weiner (1994) noted large variations in the yields of phytoliths from wheat grown in northern Europe versus Israel, and
within Israel under different conditions. The significance of
these observations is equivocal, as both the amount of rainfall
and the extent of irrigation vary.
In general the phytolith morphotypes in each plant or plant
part are similar in both collections. We note that in both
regions spheroids (globulars) are the predominant phytoliths
in wood and bark, as are polyhedrals and tracheids from dicot
leaves (e.g., in the Israel collection Prunus amygdalus produces 88% polyhedrals and tracheary elements and in the
Greek collection 72%). Lens culinaris on the other hand produces 65% tracheary elements in the Greek collection and
only 29% tracheary elements and 61% cylindroids in the Israel
collection. We noted above the presence of jigsaw puzzle phytoliths in Lens culinaris in the Greek collection (12%) and
their absence in the Israel collection. Grasses also show a similar distribution of morphotypes. For example, in the inflorescence of Avena sterilis short cells, long cells and silica
skeleton long cells are abundant and present in roughly the
same proportions in both collections. In the Greek collection
they constitute 39%, 25% and 25% respectively and in the
1272
Fig. 6. Spodogram from the stem of Juncus sp., showing rod and long cell
silica skeletons and stomata.
Israel collection 37%, 7% and 31% respectively. Similar distributions are present in Cynodon dactylon; the short cells and
long cells prevail and constitute 48% and 24% respectively
in the Greek collection and 42% and 19% respectively in the
East African collection. We note though that the short cells
of Cynodon dactylon in the Greek collection are mostly of
the chloridoid type, whereas in the African collection they
are of the festucoid types.
Finally, a comparison of the v/c ratios obtained in this study
to those reported by Albert et al. (1999) shows that dicot
leaves and especially grasses have similar ratios. In Albert
et al.s collection the average is 0.22 and 0.09 respectively
and in this collection they are 0.16 and 0.02. Major differences
are present in fruits (Alberts average 2.18, while in this
collection it is 0.95) and especially in wood/bark (4.97 in
her collection and 0.95 in this one). The lower wood/bark ratio
obtained in this study can be attributed to the higher extent of
contamination (40e50% in this study vs about 30% in Albert
et al.s (2003) study).
4. General discussion
A quantitative reference collection of phytoliths from
modern plants is the basis for documenting which plants leave
their traces in the form of siliceous phytoliths in the sediments
of an archaeological site and to what extent. The quantitative
The woody species are the most conspicuous and archaeologically important group of low phytolith producers. This
broad survey of phytoliths in wood and bark confirms that
wood from many species does not contain any phytoliths,
and in those species that do contain phytoliths, the concentrations are very low. In contrast, almost all the bark samples
analysed do contain phytoliths, although also in relatively
small concentrations. Furthermore a significant proportion of
the bark phytoliths are clearly contaminants. An added problem is that many of the phytoliths produced by woody species
have irregular or variable morphologies. Using only phytoliths
to reconstruct the use of wood and bark by humans is clearly
fraught with difficulties.
These severe weaknesses are offset to a certain extent by
the fact that many species of trees also produce a different
form of mineralized material mainly in their bark. This is an
aggregate of soil minerals embedded in a biologically produced matrix of silica that unlike phytoliths also contains
abundant ions such as iron, aluminium and potassium. These
were originally called silica aggregates by Sangster and
Parry (1981), but because the silica is so impure, Schiegl
et al. (1994) referred to them as siliceous aggregates. Siliceous aggregates, like phytoliths, are relatively insoluble and
thus often persist in the archaeological record. Their presence
together with phytoliths characteristic of wood and bark (e.g.,
a high proportion of variable morphology phytoliths, spheroids
and ellipsoids) would be indicative of wood having been
brought to the site (Schiegl et al., 1994).
As wood is mainly used for fuel, the burning process can
also augment the phytolith record. If preservation conditions
are good, then the calcitic ash produced by burning of the
calcium oxalate minerals, which are usually abundant in
wood and bark, will also be preserved. Under poorer preservation conditions, the calcitic ash may convert into various more
insoluble phosphate minerals that can also be recognized as
having been derived from ash (Karkanas et al., 2000, 2002;
Schiegl et al., 1996). The refractive index of the phytoliths
changes as a result of exposure to high temperatures (Elbaum
et al., 2003). This too can be used to infer the presence of
wood fuel. Thus despite the fact that trees generally produce
few phytoliths, their unique characteristics and association
with siliceous aggregates, ash and charcoal, together with
the fact that often large quantities of wood were burnt, can
produce a reliable and informative record.
It has been noted that in certain prehistoric caves calcitic
ash is present, often in the form of hearths, but phytoliths
and siliceous aggregates indicative of wood and bark are
1273
1274
Acknowledgements
We thank Ali Sinap for his invaluable information on the
use of plants by the inhabitants of Rhodope mountain. We
also thank Ofer Bar-Yosef for his help with the initial sample
collection, as well as Gordon Hillman and Dorian Fuller for
their help in the identification of Hynaldia villosa and Stipa
bromoides. We thank Mr George Schwartzmann, Sarasota,
Florida, for his generous financial support. We also thank
the Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science for their financial support. S.W. is the incumbent of the Dr Trude Burchardt
professorial chair of Structural Biology. G.T. conducted this
study during her fellowship in environmental studies by the
Wiener Laboratory at the American School of Classical
Studies at Athens. Part of this study was supported by the British School at Athens.
References
Abrantes, F., 2003. A 340,000 year continental climate record from tropical
Africa e news from opal phytoliths from the equatorial Atlantis. Earth
and Planetary Science Letters 209, 165e179.
Albert, R.M., 2000. Study of ash layers through phytolith analyses from the
Middle Palaeolithic levels of Kebara and Tabun Caves. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona, Barcelona.
Albert, R.M., Tsatskin, A., Ronen, A., Lavi, O., Estroff, L., Lev-Yadun, S.,
Weiner, S., 1999. Mode of occupation of Tabun Cave, Mt. Carmel Israel,
during the Mousterian period: a study of the sediments and the phytoliths.
Journal of Archaeological Science 26, 1249e1260.
Albert, R.M., Bar-Yosef, O., Meignen, L., Weiner, S., 2000. Phytoliths in the
Middle Paleolithic deposits of Kebara cave, Mt. Carmel, Israel: study of
the plant materials used for fuel and other purposes. Journal of Archaeological Science 27, 931e947.
Albert, R.M., Weiner, S., 2001. Study of phytoliths in prehistoric ash layers
using a quantitative approach. In: Meunier, J.D., Coline, F. (Eds.), Phytoliths: Applications in Earth Sciences and Human History. A.A. Balkema
Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 251e266.
Albert, R.M., Bar-Yosef, O., Meignen, L., Weiner, S., 2003. Phytolith and mineralogical study of hearths from the Middle Paleolithic levels of Hayonim
Cave (Galilee, Israel). Journal of Archaeological Science 30, 461e480.
Albert, R.M., Bamford, M.K., Cabanes, D., 2006. Taphonomy of phytoliths
and macroplants in different soils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) and
the application to Plio-Pleistocene palaeoanthropological samples. Quaternary International 148, 78e94.
Albert, R.M., Shahack-Gross, R., Cabanes, D., Gilboa, A., Lev-Yadun, S.,
Portillo, M., Sharon, I., Boaretto, E., Weiner, S. Phytolith rich layers
from the Late Bronze and iron Ages at Tel-Dor (Israel): mode of formation
and archaeological significance. Journal of Archaeological Science, submitted for publication.
Ball, T., Gardner, J.S., Brotherson, J.D., 1996. Identifying phytoliths produced
by the inflorescence bracts of three species of wheat (Triticum monococcum
L., T. dicoccum Schrank., and T. aestivum L.) using computer-assisted image
and statistical analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 23, 619e632.
Ball, T.B., Gardner, J.S., Anderson, N., 1999. Identifying inflorescence phytoliths from selected species of wheat (Triticum monococcum, T. dicoccon, T.
dicoccoides, and T. aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare and H. spontaneum). American Journal of Botany 86 (11), 1615e1623.
Bamford, M.K., Albert, R.M., Cabanes, D., 2006. Assessment of the Lowermost Bed II Plio-Pleistocene vegetation in the eastern palaeolake margin
of Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) and preliminary results from macroplant
and phytoliths. Quaternary International 148, 95e112.
Beloyanni, M.P., 1995. Mat impressions on prehistoric pottery from Tsoungiza. Annals of Archaeology XXII 1989, 171e182 (in Greek).
1275
Pearsall, D.M., Piperno, D.R., Dinan, E.H., Umlauf, M., Zhao, Z.,
Benefer, R.A., 1995. Distinguishing rice (Oryza sativa Poaceae) from
wild Oryza species through phytolith analysis: results of preliminary
research. Economic Botany 49, 183e196.
Piperno, D.R., 1984. A comparison and differentiation of phytoliths from
maize and wild grasses: use of morphological criteria. American Antiquity
49, 361e383.
Piperno, D.R., 1988. Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological
Perspective. Academic Press, New York.
Piperno, D., Holst, I., Wessel-Beaver, L., Andres, T.C., 2002. Evidence for the
control of phytolith formation in Cucurbita fruits by the hard rind (Hr)
genetic locus: archaeological and ecological implications. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 99,
10923e10928.
Pollunin, O., 1969. Flowers of Europe, a Field Guide. Oxford University Press,
London.
Rosen, A.M., 1992. Preliminary identification of silica skeletons from Near
Eastern archaeological sites: an anatomical approach. In: Rapp, G.,
Mulholand, S.C. (Eds.), Phytolith Systematics. Plenum Press, New York,
pp. 129e148.
Rosen, A.M., 2000. Phytolith analysis in Near Eastern archaeology. In:
Pike, S., Gitin, S. (Eds.), The Practical Impact of Science on Near
Eastern and Aegean Archaeology. Archaetype Publications, London,
pp. 9e15.
Rosen, A.M., 2005. Phytolith indicators of plant and land use at C
atalhoyuk.
In: Hodder, I. (Ed.), Inhabiting C
atalhoyuk: Reports from the 1995e1999
Seasons. C
atalhoyuk Project, Vol. 4, Part A. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge, pp. 203e212.
Rosen, A.M., Weiner, S., 1994. Identifying ancient irrigation: a new method
using opaline phytoliths from emmer wheat. Journal of Archaeological
Science 21, 132e135.
Sangster, A.G., Parry, D.W., 1981. Ultrastructure of silica deposits in
higher plants. In: Simpson, T.L., Volcani, B.E. (Eds.), Silicon and Siliceous Structures in Biological Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York,
pp. 383e407.
Schiegl, S., Lev-Yadun, S., Bar-Yosef, O., El Goresy, A., Weiner, S., 1994.
Siliceous aggregates from prehistoric wood ash: a major component of
sediments in Kebara and Hayonim caves (Israel). Israel Journal of Earth
Science 43, 267e278.
Schiegl, S., Goldberg, P., Bar-Yosef, O., Weiner, S., 1996. Ash deposits in
Hayonim and Kebara caves, Israel: macroscopic microscopic and mineralogical observations and their archaeological implications. Journal of
Archaeological Science 23, 763e781.
Schiegl, S., Stockhammer, P., Scott, C., Wadley, L., 2004. A mineralogical and
phytolith study of the Middle Stone Age hearths in Sibudu cave, KwazuluNatal South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100, 185e194.
Scott Cummings, L., 1992. Illustrated phytoliths from assorted food plants. In:
Rapp, G., Mulholand, S.C. (Eds.), Phytolith Systematics. Plenum Press,
New York, pp. 175e192.
Shahack-Gross, R., Albert, R.M., Gilboa, A., Nagar-Hilman, O., Sharon, I.,
Weiner, S., 2005. Geoarchaeology in an urban context: the uses of space
in a Phoenician monumental building at Tel Dor (Israel). Journal of
Archaeological Science 32, 1417e1431.
Theobald, W.L., Krahulik, J.L., Rollins, R.C., 1979. Trichome description and
classification. In: Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. (Eds.)Anatomy of Dicotyledons, second ed., vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 40e53.
Twiss, P.C., Erwin, S., Smith, R.M., 1969. Morphological classification of
grass phytoliths. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 33,
109e115.
Zhao, Z., Pearsall, D.M., Benefer, A.B., Piperno, D.R., 1998. Distinguishing
rice (Oryza sativa Poaceae) from wild Oryza species through phytolith
analysis, II: finalized method. Economic Botany 52, 134e135.
Zheng, Y., Dong, Y., Matsui, A., Udatsu, T., Fujiwara, H., 2003. Molecular
genetic basis of determining subspecies of ancient rice using the shape
of phytoliths. Journal of Archaeological Science 30, 1215e1221.