Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Applying Modern Techniques of Managerial
Accounting in The Jordanian Industrial Public
Shareholding Companies
!" #
400910046 :
$%
'( )
)*****!(+ $**
.
. /! (
! 01
,- %
$%
1
!
(1
.
2012 2
( 15)
: 1-1
: 2 -1
: 3 -1
: 4 -1
: 5 -1
: 6 1
:7 1
:
: 1 -2
10
: 2 -2
11
:3 - 2
18
:4 2
24
:5 2
29
:6- 2
39
: 7 -2
47
:8 2
49
:9 2
65
:
:1-3
67
:2-3
67
:3-3
67
:4-3
67
:5-3
69
:6-3
70
:7-3
71
:8-3
71
:
:1-4
74
:2-4
74
:3-4
77
:4-4
90
:
: 1-5
98
: 2-5
101
104
112
61
68
72
76
78
6
.
80
7
.
82
84
9
Six Sigma .
86
10
.
88
11
.
90
12
91
13
92
14
93
15
93
16
94
17
95
18
96
)(1
112
)(2
122
)(3
123
)(4
126
:
:
.
) (109
:
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4
.
- 5
.
-6
Six Sigma .
-7
.
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
studied companies.
implementing
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
1-1:
.
.
.
:
. . . Six Sigma .
.
.
2-1 :
:
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5 Six Sigma
.6
3-1 :
:" "
:
:"
"
:" "
:" "
:"
"
:" Six Sigma "
:"
"
4-1 :
.
.
.
.
.
5-1 :
:
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
6-1 :
-
) (94 .
-
: .
- : . 2012/ 2011
- :
Six Sigma .
.
7-1 :
:
:
) (
.
:
) (
.
:
/
:
.
Six Sigma :
3.4 .
1/2
2/2
3/2
4/2
5/2
6/2
7/2
8/2
9/2
10
:
1-2
.
.
). 2003 (17
.
.
.
) 2007.( 1
11
:
. . . . - Six Sigma .
.
) 1987 ( (Cooper
) &Kaplan
) Activity Based Costing ( A.B.C
12
) .
1997 (625
.
:
-1 .
-2 .
)(
13
) .2007 ( 161-158
) 2007 (282-281
"
.
") 2001 (378) ( Neumann et al., 2004,p 40
"
)(Arnaboldi and Lapsley, 2003,p347
) : 2010 (511
:
14
-1
.
-2
.
-3 .
-4
.
-5
.
.
) :2008( 120-115
-1 :
15
:
. :
. .
. . -2 :
.
-3 :
.
-4 :
)(
.
16
-5 :
.
:
-1
(Needy et al, 2003,p3).
-2
) . 2001
(387
-3
) . 2002 (212
-4
17
(Caplan et al,2002,p249) .
-5
). 2005 (625
):2007 188-187
)Garrisson et al., 2008, p 334
:
-1
.
-2
.
18
-3
.
-4
) (
.
3-2 :
:
).( Fellman,1999,p1
19
.
) 2000 . (22
Ellaram
( Ellaram,2000,p39) .
) . 2005 .(429
.
.
20
.
.
:
(Bird, 2003 ,pp112-117) :
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4
.
-5
.
21
-6
.
-7
.
:
.
. ( :
)Ansari et al,1997, p 33
-1 :
) (
.
:
.
.
22
.
.
.
-2 :
.
-3 :
:
.
:
.
.
.
.
23
-4 :
) . 2000(27
-5 :
.
-6 :
.
) 2000. (29
24
4-2
.
.
)( Erik, 2002, p372
). ( Erik, 2002, p372
). (Winer , 2001, p 9
25
/
)( Erik , 2005 , p 373
.
)(Turne, 2006, p 3
.
26
.
)(Krakhmal, 2006, p2
-
-
-
-
- .
.
:
) Erik,2005,pp372-381 (Santori and Najel, 2005, p5
- / :
27
.
- :
.
:
- :
.
- :
.
- :
.
28
.
:
: .
.
:
.
:
.
:
.
29
-3 :
.
)(Santori and Najel , 2005, p5
5-2 :
.
.
.
30
.
.
31
)(Kaplan and Norton,1996,p 10
.
) . 2009 ( 24
)(Robinson "
) .(Robinson,2005,p 52
(Horngren,2005 , p448 ) .
32
.
.
:
:
.
.
.
.
.
33
:
) (Kaplan & Norton,2005, p449
:
-1 ):(Financial Perspective
.
.
.
-2 ):(Customers Perspective
34
.
.
.
-3 ):(Internal Processes Perspective
.
) 2007(132
:
:
.
35
:
.
:
.
-4 ):(Learning and Growth Perspective
.
.
36
:
. ) (Kaplan and Norton
(Kaplan,and Norton , 2005, p 452 ) :
-1:
) Strategic Business
(Unit
.
.
-2 : :
.
.
37
.
-3 :
.
.
-4 : :
.
-5 :
.
:
-
.
.
38
-6 :
:
-
.
-
.
-7:
.
.
-8 :
39
.
.
6-2 Six Sigma
Six Sigma
) (Total Quality Management
) (Reengineering
.
) ...(
) (Process Improvement ) Performance
(Improvement .
.
40
) .2007
(22
)
( .
) 2008 (14
3.4
( Anbari and Kwak , 2006, p .%99.99966
)208
.
) 2002 (33
) (
" " " "
" " " " 9000
41
) : 2001 :(43-33
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4
.
-5
.
:
) (Mellahi, 2004,p50
:
-1 .
-2 .
42
-3 .
-4 .
-5 .
-6 .
-7 .
-8 .
:
.
) (sigma level
) Per Millio Opportunities Defect (DPMO
) : 2010 .(145
: .
) :( sigma .
. -
43
.
:
DMAIC
.1 . Define
.2 .Measure
.3 .Analyze
.4 .Improve
.5 .Control
Define
) ( ) : 2004
24 2001 (3
-1 :
) (Process ) (Function
.
-2 : ) (Core Process
) (Support Process
:
44
) (Corporate- Wide
).(Operating- unit level
.
.
-3 : ) (SIPOC
:
) :(Supplier . ) :(Input .
) :(Process . ) :(Output . ) :(Customer . -4 : ) (Voice Of The Customer
:
. - .
45
46
47
: Improve
) 2008 :(57
Solution Prioritization .Process Planning : Control
): ( Antoney , et al. , 2007 , p 248
. . ). (Quality Control . 7-2 :
(Adler et al., 2000,p133) :
(1
(2
48
(3
(4
(5
(6
(7
49
: :
8-2
1-8-2 :
) (2001 " : "
.
.
:
. . .
50
51
.
) (2005 " "
.
.
. :
%66.6 %63.3
%66.1 %70.2
-
%92.5
.
-
52
) ( 2005" : ".
.
.
) (2005 ) (
.
:
.
53
.
) (2008 " "
.
:
-1
-2 .
-3
-4 .
-5 .
-6
-7 .
54
- ) (2008 :
. 31
) (2009 : ) (BSC ) (ABC )
(
) (ABC ) ( BSC
(Cooper Two-Stages
) Activity Based Costing System
.
: )(ABC
55
)(BSC
. :
)(ABC
.
:
.
:
(ABC)
.
) (2010
.
.
56
) (101. :
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4
) : ()
() () ()
) ( ( ) ()
(
57
) ( 2010 ) ( :
.
:
-1 .
-2 ABC :
ABC .
-3 ABC ABC
.
58
2-8-2 :
) (2002)( Ittner et al )
(:
The Association Between Activity-based Costing and Manufacturing
Performance
. ) (2789
) (Cross-Sectional .
) (1997 .
.
(2002) Cokins : )(ABC
:Integrating Target Cost and ABC
)(ABC
.
.
.
59
60
) (2006)(Ellram ) : (:
The implementation of target costing in the United States: Theory versus
Practice
.
) ( Rodney, 2006 : :
Six Sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects
.
61
)(1
2001
- -
:
"
.
-
2003
) (ABC
.
.
-
.
.
2003
-
.
.
.
62
2005
-
%66.6
.
. %63.3
.%92.5
2005
.
2005
.
.
. .
2008
.
.
2008
63
.
.
.
.
2009
)(BSC
) (ABC
) (ABC ( )(ABC
). (BSC
) BSC
)(ABC
( .
2010
-1
.
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4
.
64
2010
- ABC
ABC
.
)Ittner et al
2002
Cokins
2002
). (ABC
) (ABC
Khasharmeh
2002
%10 40
.
.
%16.5
Borgernas
and Fridh
2003
( .
Ellram
65
2006
Rodney, 2006
9-2 :
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
66
1/3
2/3
3/3
4/3
5/3
6/3
7/3
8/3
67
1-3 :
.
2-3 :
.
3-3 :
) (94 %64
.
.
) (129 ) (109 %84.5
.
68
4-3 :
.
.
) (2
.
)(2
.
.
.
15-1
27-16
38-28
50-39
Six Sigma .
65-51
78-66
69
:
) (5 ) (4 ) (3
) (2 ) (1 .
= 4 = 1-5
4 1.333 = 3
:
2.33 = 1.33+1 1 = 2.33 .
3.66 = 1.33 +2.33 2.33 = 3.66 .
5.00 = 1.33 + 3.66 -3.66 =5.00 .
5-3 :
:
:
70
.
:
:
.
6-3 :
:
:
.
71
) :(T-test
.
) ( Cronbach Alpha
7-3 :
) (4 ) (2
.
) (78 .
8-3
) (3
%60
).(Sekaran,1992,p174
72
)(3
) (
%95.2
%93.8
%94.5
%95.7
Six Sigma .
%97.2
%90.6
%98.8
73
1/4
2/4
3/4
4/4
74
1-4
.
2-4 :
1-2-4
) (4
) (43 ) ( %39.4
) (34 ) (% 31.2
) (32 ) . (%29.4
1-2-4
) (4
) (87 ) ( %79.8
) (17 ) ( %15.6
) ( 4 ) (%3.7 ) (1
75
) .(%0.9
.
3-2-4
) (91 ) ( %83.5
) (12 ) (%11 )(5
) (%4.6
) (%0.9
.
4-2-4
) (4 ) (48 ) ( %44
5 10
) (28 ) (%25.7
) 10 15( 15 )( 16
) (%14.7 .
76
)(4
43
39.4
34
31.2
32
29.4
109
100
17
15.6
87
79.8
3.7
.9
109
100
91
83.5
4.6
12
11.0
.9
109
100.0
48
44.0
5 10
28
25.7
10 15
16
14.7
15
16
14.7
.9
109
100.0
77
3-4
78 :
1-3-4
) (15-1 ) ( 5 ) - 3.92
(4.25 ) 0.851 .(0.640
) (2 ":
"
) (14 " :
" .
.
78
)(5
4.21
.601
.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
4.25
.640
13
11
12
10
4.24
.849
4.16
.655
3.97
.775
4.06
.808
4.02
.816
4.24
.706
4.15
.718
4.22
.629
.
.
4.11
.712
79
12
13
4.24
.651
4.13
.795
14
15
3.92
.851
15
14
3.95
.786
4.12
0.572
2-3-4
) (27-16 ) (6 )(4.29 -3.86
) ( .657 - .967
) ( 19 ":
"
) ( 18 "
" .
) ( 4.09
.
80
.
)(6
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4.18
.626
4.13
.625
3.86
.967
4.29
.657
4.12
.802
4.06
.749
4.23
.789
4.03
.763
4.04
.719
4.05
.725
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
10
81
.
26
4.17
.646
.
27
3.97
.775
11
4.09
0.572
3-3-4
) (38-28 ) ( 7 ) (4.11- 3.56
) .(0.774 - 0.810
) (30 ":
"
) (38 " :
.
.
82
)(7
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
3.70
.799
3.91
.714
4.11
.774
3.93
.879
4.08
.759
3.90
.849
.
.
.
.
3.69 .
.778
10
3.83
.714
3.81
.866
3.77
.765
3.56
.810
11
3.84
0.638
.
.
.
.
... .
.
83
4-3-4
) (50-39 ) .( 8
) (3.91- 3.57 ) .(0.688 - 0.786
) (48 ":
"
) (47 " :
.
.
84
)(8
39
40
41
3.88
.802
3.90
.816
3.73
.689
42
3.71
.711
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
3.86
.897
3.72
.734
3.76
.744
3.65
.699
11
.
3.57
.
3.91
.786
.688
12
.
.
3.68
.815
10
85
50
3.80
.791
3.76
0.638
86
)(9
Six Sigma
51
52
53
54
55
56
4.06
.
.848
3.71
.724
3.72
.721
3.76 .
.849
3.79
.861
3.78
.875
14
13
.
57
58
59
60
61
3.79
.771
3.79
.861
3.96
.804
3.73
.728
3.90
.804
.
.
.
.
.
10
87
62
63
64
65
3.73
.728
3.73
.741
3.76
.756
3.67
.752
3.79
0.668
.
.
.
.
11
11
15
6-3-4
) (10
) (3.9 -3.18
) (0.959 - 1.292
) 69 71 (75 ":
"
) (66 " :
"
88
)(10
66
67
68
69
3.18
1.292
3.85
.931
3.85
.941
3.93
.959
.
.
.
13
.
70
71
72
73
74
3.39
1.297
3.93
.930
3.65
.975
3.59
.852
3.39
1.019
.
.
.
.
10
11
89
.
75
76
77
3.93
.
.910
3.77
.835
3.30
.898
12
.
78
3.50
.949
3.63
0.681
7-3-4
) (11
)(4.12
) (4.09
) ( 3.84
Six Sigma ) (3.79
) .(3.76
.
90
)(11
.572
1
2
4.12
4.09
.572
3.84
.638
Six Sigma .
3.79
.668
3.76
.638
4-4
1-4-4
) :(Ho1 .
) :(Ha1 .
91
) ( 12
Sig.
18.931
1.981
0.00
) ( T
) (12
)(T ) (1.981 0.05
.
2-4-4 :
) :(Ho1:1
.
) :(Ha1:1
.
92
) ( 13
Sig.
20.526
1.981
0.00
) ( T
) (13
) (T ) (1.981 0.05
.
.
3-4-4 :
) :(H01:2 .
) :(Ha1:2 .
93
) ( 14
Sig.
19.973
1.981
0.00
) ( T
) (14
) (T ) (1.981 0.05
.
4-4-4 :
) :(Ho1:3 .
) :(Ha1:3 .
) ( 15
Sig.
13.506
1.981
0.00
94
) ( T
) (15
) (T ) (1.981 0.05
.
.
5-4-4 :
) :(Ho1:4
.
) :(Ha1:4
.
) ( 16
Sig.
12.639
1.981
0.00
95
) (1.981 0.05
.
.
6-4-4 :
) :(Ho1:5 Six Sigma
.
) :(Ha1:5 Six Sigma .
) ( 17
Sig.
12.398
1.981
0.00
96
7-4-4
) :(Ho2
.
) :(Ha2
.
) ( 18
Sig.
9.748
1.981
0.00
97
1/5
2/5
98
1-5
-1
.
.
-2
) (4.12
.
) (2001 ) (2003
)( Khasharmeh, 2002
-3
) (4.09
.
) (2008 ) (Ittner et al , 2000
99
). ( Boirgernas et al ., 2000
-4
)(3.84
.
- 5
) (3.76
.
-6
Six Sigma
) (3.79
.
-7
) (3.63
100
.
) 2003 2008 Khasharmeh, 2002
.(Borgernas and Fridhm, 2000
101
2-5
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6
) (
.
102
.7
.
103
104
:
(2004)
.
) (2001 :
) ( : .
) (2007
.
) (2005
) (2007 :
.
) (2007 :
.
) (2010
.
) (2005
.
) " (2008
105
" 20
. 111-107
) .(2002 .
.
) ( 2005
21 3
. 653-615
) (2010
.
.(2007 )
.
) (2000
22 2
. 421 -373
) (2010
) ( .
) (2008
) .( .
106
) (2008 .
( 2002) :
.
) (2005
:
.
) (2000
28 -22
. 30
) (2007 :
.
) (2003
.
) (2010
.
.(2001 )
.
) (2009 )(BSC
107
) (ABC
) (
.
)" (2003
) (ABC : "
27 1 .344-323
) (2008
24 .
) (2005
:
. 436-429
) " (2003
" 1
.307-297
.(2001) ) 20 (2
.48-33
" (1997)
108
" :
. (36)
( 2008)
.
: :
109
Costing
and
Manufacturing
Performance,
Journal
of
110
Hussien,(2002)"Activity-Based
Costing
in
Jordanian
an
activity-based
costing
system
for
small
manufactures",
111
112
)(1
"
"
.
:
113
: ) )( (
) (
) (
5 10
10 15
15
114
:
: )
)( (
.
2
115
.
10
.
11
.
12
.
13
.
14
.
15
.
) )( (
16
.
17
.
18
.
19
116
.
20
.
21
.
22
.
23
.
24
.
25
.
26
.
27
.
117
) )( (
28
.
29
.
30
.
31
.
32
.
33
.
34 .
35 .
36
.
37
000 .
38
.
) )( (
39 .
40
118
.
41
.
42
.
43
.
44
.
45
.
46
.
47
.
48
.
49
.
50
.
Six Sigma ) )( (
51
.
52
119
.
53
.
54 .
55
.
56
.
57
.
58
.
59
.
60
.
61
.
62
.
63
.
64
.
65
.
120
) )( (
66
.
67
.
68
.
69
.
70
.
71
.
72
.
73
.
74
.
75
.
76
.
121
77
78
........................................................................................... .1
............................................................................................ .2
............................................................................................ .3
122
)(2
-1
-2
-3
123
)(3
10
11
12
CJC
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
124
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
125
54
55
56
57
58
S.A.M
59
126
(4 )
Frequencies
Statistics
job
N
Valid
edlevel
Special
exper
109
109
109
108
Missing
Frequency Table
job
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
1.00
43
39.4
39.4
39.4
2.00
34
31.2
31.2
70.6
3.00
32
29.4
29.4
100.0
127
job
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
1.00
43
39.4
39.4
39.4
2.00
34
31.2
31.2
70.6
3.00
32
29.4
29.4
100.0
Total
109
100.0
100.0
Edlevel
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
1.00
17
15.6
15.6
15.6
2.00
87
79.8
79.8
95.4
3.00
3.7
3.7
99.1
5.00
.9
.9
100.0
Total
109
100.0
100.0
Special
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
128
Valid
1.00
91
83.5
83.5
83.5
2.00
4.6
4.6
88.1
3.00
12
11.0
11.0
99.1
5.00
.9
.9
100.0
Total
109
100.0
100.0
Exper
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
1.00
48
44.0
44.4
44.4
2.00
28
25.7
25.9
70.4
3.00
16
14.7
14.8
85.2
4.00
16
14.7
14.8
100.0
Total
108
99.1
100.0
.9
109
100.0
System
Total
Descriptives
129
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
a1
109
1.00
5.00
4.2110
.60970
a2
109
1.00
5.00
4.2477
.64054
a3
109
1.00
5.00
4.2385
.84874
a4
109
1.00
5.00
4.1560
.65510
a5
109
1.00
5.00
3.9725
.77530
a6
109
1.00
5.00
4.0642
.80824
a7
109
1.00
5.00
4.0183
.81629
a8
109
1.00
5.00
4.2385
.70578
a9
109
1.00
5.00
4.1468
.71784
a10
109
1.00
5.00
4.2202
.62890
a11
109
1.00
5.00
4.1101
.71154
a12
109
1.00
5.00
4.2385
.65120
a13
109
1.00
5.00
4.1284
.79467
a14
109
1.00
5.00
3.9174
.85123
a15
109
1.00
5.00
3.9541
.78629
b1
109
1.00
5.00
4.1835
.62606
b2
109
1.00
5.00
4.1284
.62511
b3
109
1.00
5.00
3.8624
.96674
b4
109
1.00
5.00
4.2936
.65691
130
b5
109
1.00
5.00
4.1193
.80190
b6
109
1.00
5.00
4.0642
.74877
b7
109
1.00
5.00
4.2294
.78920
b8
109
1.00
5.00
4.0275
.76326
b9
109
1.00
5.00
4.0367
.71914
b10
109
1.00
5.00
4.0459
.72502
b11
109
1.00
5.00
4.1651
.64569
b12
109
1.00
5.00
3.9725
.77530
c1
109
1.00
5.00
3.6972
.79936
c2
109
1.00
5.00
3.9083
.71416
c3
109
1.00
5.00
4.1101
.77387
c4
109
1.00
5.00
3.9266
.87883
c5
109
1.00
5.00
4.0826
.75924
c6
109
1.00
5.00
3.8991
.84924
c7
109
1.00
5.00
3.6881
.77814
c8
109
1.00
5.00
3.8349
.71380
c9
109
1.00
5.00
3.8073
.86578
c10
109
1.00
5.00
3.7706
.76537
c11
109
1.00
5.00
3.5596
.81002
d1
109
1.00
5.00
3.8807
.80190
d2
109
1.00
5.00
3.8991
.81587
131
d3
109
1.00
5.00
3.7339
.68910
d4
109
1.00
5.00
3.7064
.71106
d5
109
1.00
5.00
3.8624
.89720
d6
109
1.00
5.00
3.7156
.73399
d7
109
1.00
5.00
3.7615
.74410
d8
109
1.00
5.00
3.6514
.69889
d9
109
1.00
5.00
3.5688
.78607
d10
109
1.00
5.00
3.9083
.68774
d11
109
1.00
5.00
3.6789
.81514
d12
109
1.00
5.00
3.7982
.79092
e1
109
1.00
5.00
4.0550
.84804
e2
109
1.00
5.00
3.7064
.72396
e3
109
1.00
5.00
3.7156
.72126
e4
109
1.00
5.00
3.7615
.84874
e5
109
1.00
5.00
3.7890
.86145
e6
109
1.00
5.00
3.7798
.87515
e7
109
1.00
5.00
3.7890
.77068
e8
109
1.00
5.00
3.7890
.86145
e9
109
1.00
5.00
3.9633
.80423
e10
109
1.00
5.00
3.7339
.72829
e11
109
1.00
5.00
3.8991
.80444
132
e12
109
1.00
5.00
3.7339
.72829
e13
109
1.00
5.00
3.7339
.74090
e14
109
1.00
5.00
3.7615
.75644
e15
109
1.00
5.00
3.6972
.75160
f1
109
1.00
5.00
3.1835
1.29218
f2
109
1.00
5.00
3.8532
.93120
f3
109
1.00
5.00
3.8532
.94110
f4
109
1.00
5.00
3.9266
.95942
f5
109
1.00
5.00
3.3853
1.29749
f6
109
1.00
5.00
3.9266
.93002
f7
109
1.00
5.00
3.6514
.97540
f8
109
1.00
5.00
3.5872
.85213
f9
109
1.00
5.00
3.3945
1.01852
f10
109
1.00
5.00
3.9266
.90989
f11
109
1.00
5.00
3.7706
.83481
f12
109
1.00
5.00
3.3028
.89757
f13
109
1.00
5.00
3.5046
.94892
Valid N (listwise)
109
T-Test
T tab = 1.981
133
One-Sample Statistics
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
h1
109
3.9284
.51206
.04905
109
4.1242
.57180
.05477
109
4.0940
.57188
.05478
109
3.8440
.63830
.06114
109
3.7638
.63114
.06045
109
3.7939
.66855
.06404
h2
109
3.6359
.68103
.06523
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 3
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Lower
Upper
h1
18.930
108
.000
.92844
.8312
1.0257
20.526
108
.000
1.12416
1.0156
1.2327
19.973
108
.000
1.09404
.9855
1.2026
13.806
108
.000
.84404
.7229
.9652
12.634
108
.000
.76376
.6439
.8836
134
12.398
108
.000
.79388
.6670
.9208
h2
9.748
108
.000
.63585
.5066
.7651
Reliability
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
109
100.0
.0
109
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.952
15
135
Reliability
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
109
100.0
.0
109
100.0
N of Items
.938
12
136
Reliability
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
109
100.0
.0
109
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.945
11
137
Reliability
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
109
100.0
.0
109
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.957
12
138
Reliability
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
109
100.0
.0
109
100.0
Alpha
.972
15
139
Reliability
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
109
100.0
.0
109
100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.906
13