Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Img. 1 - Extra-oral clinical situation: the patient came asking for aesthetic rehabilitation in the anterior area
after having undergone orthodontic treatment.
Page 1 of 12
Img. 3 - Detail of the tooth structure in the anterior area. We can observe modification in shape and and
color.
Img. 4 - After having taken an impression, and having done a smile analysis, a wax-up was made by the
dental technician.
Page 2 of 12
Img. 5 - A silicone index was made onto the wax-up in order to produce a mock-up. The mockup is the best
way to communicate our aesthetic treatment plan to the patient, who can visualize an close idea of the
final result. For the mock-up, in this case we used a bis-acryl resin (Protemp 4, 3M).
Also, the mock-up is the way to predict the space needed for the restorative material during preparation.
Img. 6 - In the cases in which space is available to add restorative material onto untouched enamel we
should use a hard grain disc (Sof-Lex red disc or black disc) to remove the aprysmatic surface enamel and
round the sharp angles.
Img. 7 - Before the impressions and with the tooth hydrated, we should select the shade we want to our
final ceramic restorations. This shade selection should be made with the same shade guide used by the
dental ceramist.
Using a proper photographic protocol helps in the communication with the laboratory.
Page 3 of 12
Img. 8 - We place the retraction cord #000 and #00 (Ultrapack, Ultradent) and take the final impression
to send to the Lab.
In this case we have also an impression of an implant to take, so we proceed with all the tooth impression
at same time.
Img. 9 - Zirconia abutment try-in. With a acetate pen we draw a line surrounding the gingival margin for
the dental technician to know where the actual cervical margin is, and also the excess of zirconia to
remove in the incisal area.
After that, a feldspathic glass ceramic layer was applied to cover the Zirconia abutment. This procedure
will allow us to bond the ceramic veneers to this structure.
Img. 10 - After we send the impressions to the Lab, the dental technician starts layering the glass ceramic
Page 4 of 12
Page 5 of 12
Img. 14 - Glass ceramic veneer ready to bond in the feldspathic / zirconia abutment.
Img. 15 - Try in of the glass ceramic veneers. During this step we can check the shade of the resin cement,
the fit and the contacts.
Img. 16 - After having placed the implant abutment the adhesive surface preparation was made (9%
hydrofluoric acid per 90 seconds, wash, 37% phosphoric acid per 60 seconds, wash, dry, silane application,
bonding resin agent application).
We use the ScotchBond Multi Propose adhesive.
The main purpose of using a glass ceramic veneer on a glass ceramic abutment is to have a better control
of the final shade of the resin cement, compared with the other ceramic veneers.
Page 6 of 12
Img. 18 - In this clinical procedure we follow the technique of Pascal Magne, published in 2008.
Img. 19 - The same preparation was made on the inner surface of the glass ceramic veneer (9%
hydrofluoric acid per 90 seconds, wash, 37% phosphoric acid per 60 seconds, wash, dry, silane application,
bonding resin agent application).
We use the Variolink Veneer resin cement as a luting agent.
Page 7 of 12
Img. 20 - After bonding, application of glycerin gel on the restorative margins and light-cure for 20
seconds.
Img. 21 - Before we remove the rubber dam the excess near the margins should be removed, and the
ceramic margins polished.
Page 8 of 12
Img. 23 - Intra-oral aspect five days after the ceramic veneers adhesion.
Img. 24 - Intra-oral aspect two months after the ceramic veneers adhesion.
Page 9 of 12
Img. 26 - Intra-oral aspect three years after the ceramic veneers adhesion.
Page 10 of 12
Img. 29 - Detail of the natural integration between the glass ceramic veneers and the adjacent tissues:
gingiva and lips.
Img. 30 - Integration of the new smile in the face of the patient after four years.
Img. 31 - Natural integration of the glass ceramic veneers with the face of the patient after four years.
Conclusions
Performing a proper functional and aesthetic planning, using effective communication between the dentist,
the ceramist and the patient, increases the chances of the restorative success and longevity.
I want to thank the whole team who worked with me on this case at the Instituto Superior de Cincias da
Sade Egas Moniz: Joo Rua, Ctia Moreno, Helder Costa and Pedro Brito.
Page 11 of 12
References
Devoto W. Direct and indirect restorations in the anterior area: a comparison between the procedures.
QDT Yearbook 2003;26:127-138.
Belser UC, Magne P, Magne M, Ceramic laminate veneers: Continuous evolution of indications. J Esthet Dent
1997; 9: 197-207.
Calamia JR, Calamia CS, Porcelain laminate veneers: Reasons for 25 Years of success. Dent Clin N Am
2007:51: 399-417.
Magne P, Magne M, Jovanovic SA, An esthetic solution for single implant restorations - type III porcelain
veneer bonded to a screw-retained custom abutment: A clinical Report. J. Prosthet Dent 2008;99:2-7.
Visit: http://www.styleitaliano.org/adhesive-rehabilitation-part-ii
Page 12 of 12