Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1110
Introduc/on
to
Management
Topic
7
Mo/va/on
To learn more about this topic, read Chapters 12 and 16 of the textbook
The Internal
Environment
Topic
4:
Decision
making
Topic
1:
Founda/ons
and
history
of
management
Topic
3:
Organiza/onal
culture
The Manager
Planning
Topic
5:
Planning
and
strategy
Controlling
Topic
9:
Controlling
Leading
Topic
6:
Organiza/onal
structure
Organizing
Topic
7:
Mo*va*on
Topic
8:
Leadership
Topic
7:
Mo/va/on
What
is
mo/va/on?
Mo/va/on
theories:
Maslows
hierarchy
of
needs;
Goal-seWng
theory
Job
characteris/cs
model
Equity
theory
Expectancy
theory
Recent
research
on
intrinsic
and
extrinsic
mo/va/on
Mo/va/on
In
the
leading
func/on,
managers
work
with
and
through
people
to
accomplish
goals.
One
ac/vity
in
leading
is
to
mo/vate
employees.
The
term
mo#va#on
comes
from
the
La/n
word
movere,
which
means
to
move
Mo/va/ng
is
the
process
by
which
a
person's
eorts
are
energized,
directed,
and
sustained
toward
aaaining
a
goal
Maslows hierarchy of
needs theory
Self-
actualiza*on
Needs
Esteem
Needs
Desires
for
a
posi/ve
self-image
and
to
receive
recogni/on
from
others
Belongingness/Social
Needs
Desires
to
be
accepted
by
peers,
have
friendship,
be
part
of
a
group
Safety
Needs
Desires
for
security,
protec/on
from
physical
and
emo/onal
harm
Physiological
Needs
Basic
human
physical
needs
including
needs
for
food,
drink,
shelter,
etc.
6
Mo#va#ng
Gen-Y
in
HK
In
the
coming
decades,
Genera/on
Y
(born
1980-1994)
will
become
the
major
workforce.
A
survey
indicated
that
when
Gen
Y
in
Hong
Kong
choose
a
job
or
decide
whether
to
stay
in
a
job:
Most
important
factor:
Monetary
compensa/on
and
benets
2nd:
Clear
and
achievable
career
pathway
3rd:
Interest
and
meaningful
work
Source: Cash comes rst when the young look for work, South China Morning Post, August 21, 2012
Goal-se6ng theory
Central
thesis:
Assigning
employees
a
goal
would
make
their
performance
beLer.
Goals
direct
aaen/on
and
eort
toward
goal-relevant
ac/vi/es
and
away
from
goal-irrelevant
ac/vi/es.
10
Reducing
the
goal-performance
discrepancy
leads
to
a
sense
of
accomplishment.
Vague goal:
Do your best!
Specic
and
You
need
to
get
an
challenging
goal:
A
in
this
course!
11
Performance
goal
A
performance
goal
frames
the
instruc/ons
so
that
an
employees
focus
is
on
task
performance
e.g.
aaain
20%
market
share
by
the
end
of
the
next
scal
year
A
specic,
challenging
performance
goal
directs
aaen/on
to
the
exer/on
of
eort
and
persistence
required
to
achieve
it.
Learning
goal
A
learning
goal
frames
the
instruc/on
in
terms
of
knowledge
or
skill
acquisi/on
e.g.
discover
3
eec/ve
strategies
to
increase
market
share
A
specic,
challenging
learning
goal
draws
aaen/on
away
from
the
end
result.
The
focus
is
on
the
discovery
of
eec/ve
task
processes.
12
13
Goal
commitment
A
challenging
and
specic
goal
has
larger
impact
when
employees
are
commiaed
to
the
goal.
To
enhance
peoples
commitment
to
goals
managers
should
Make
sure
that
the
assigned
goal
is
seen
by
employees
as
realis/c
and
achievable
Set
the
goals
in
consulta/on
with
employees
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Instruc/onal
assistants
Manage
student
record
and
LMES
Exam invigila/on
21
IA
Skill Variety
Task
Iden#ty
Task
Signicance
Autonomy
Feedback
Mo#va#ng
Poten#al
=
higher
22
Use
the
scales
below
to
indicate
whether
each
statement
is
an
accurate
or
inadequate
descrip#on
of
your
present
or
most
recent
job.
5
=
very
descrip#ve
4
=
mostly
descrip#ve
3
=
somewhat
descrip#ve
2
=
mostly
non-descrip#ve
1
=
very
non-descrip#ve
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
23
=
(
___+___
)
/2
=
____
=
(
___+___
)
/2
=
____
=
(
___+___
)
/2
=
____
=
(
___+___
)
/2
=
____
=
(
___+___
)
/2
=
____
X Autonomy X Feedback
24
Equity
Theory
Equity
theory
proposes
that
Employees
perceive
what
people
get
from
a
job
situa/on
(outcomes)
in
rela/on
to
what
they
put
in
(inputs)
Then
compare
their
outcomes-to-inputs
ra/o
with
the
outcomes-to-
inputs
ra/os
of
referents
They
would
be
mo/vated
when
the
ra/os
are
perceived
as
equal
(i.e.
when
a
state
of
equity/fairness
exists)
Referents
e.g.
a
coworker,
group
of
employees
from
same
or
dierent
organiza/ons,
or
even
a
hypothe/cal
situa/on
Inputs
e.g.
eorts,
/me,
experience,
knowledge,
skills
Input
Time
and
eort
(SAME
rou/ne
data
entry
job)
Amy
Outcome
$50/hour
Outcome
$90/hour
27
28
29
Reac/ng
to
inequality:
Change
inputs
Change outcomes
Change
reference
group
Alter
self-
percep/ons
31
Expectancy
Theory
Expectancy
theory
suggests
that
mo/va/on
is
high
when
workers
believe
that
high
levels
of
eort
will
lead
to
high
performance
and
high
performance
will
lead
to
the
a9ainment
of
desired
outcomes.
Valence:
Aarac/veness
of
reward
Individual
eort
Individual
performance
Expectancy:
Eort-performance
linkage
Organiza/onal
rewards
instrumentality:
Performance-reward
linkage
32
Now,
you
believe
that
if
you
study
hard,
you
will
get
high
score
in
MGMT1110
exam
(i.e.
high
expectancy)
But
then,
you
think
even
geWng
high
exam
score
would
not
lead
you
to
get
an
A
in
MGMT1110.
Would
you
be
mo/vated
to
study
hard?
Now,
you
believe
that
if
you
study
hard,
you
will
get
high
score
in
MGMT1110
exam
(i.e.
high
expectancy)
You
also
believe
that
geWng
high
exam
score
would
lead
you
to
get
an
A
in
MGMT1110
(i.e.
high
instrumentality)
BUT,
to
you,
enjoying
student
society
ac/vi/es
is
most
important
Would
you
be
mo/vated
to
study
hard?
Recent
research
on
intrinsic
and
extrinsic
mo/va/on
Intrinsic
mo@va@on:
Mo/va/on
that
comes
from
performing
the
work
itself;
the
desired
outcome
is
in/mately
connected
to
the
work
itself.
E.g.
A
scien/st
works
to
produce
scien/c
discovery.
A
student
studies
to
learn.
Extrinsic
mo@va@on:
Mo/va/on
that
comes
from
consequences
external
to
the
work.
E.g.
A
scien/st
works
to
earn
good
salary
and
to
win
an
award.
A
student
studies
to
get
good
grades.
37
38
Complex
task:
More
$$
_Poorer
______
performance
Simple
task:
performance
More
$$
_Beaer
______
39
Drive:
The
surprising
truth
about
what
mo@vates
us
Rewards
can
perform
a
weird
sort
of
behavioral
alchemy:
They
can
transform
an
interes/ng
task
into
a
drudge.
They
can
turn
play
into
work.
And
by
diminishing
intrinsic
mo/va/on,
they
can
send
performance,
crea/vity,
and
even
upstanding
behavior
toppling
like
dominoes
-
-
-
41
Background
The
Treadway
Tire
Co.
is
a
supplier
of
*res
to
major
car
companies
like
Ford,
GM,
Chrysler
They
have
almost
9,000
employees
in
North
America
Current
Situa*on
Low
morale
and
high
turnover
among
line
foremen
Out
of
50
foreman,
23
le{
in
2007
(46%)
Dicult
and
strenuous
work
environment
Employee
surveys
and
exit
interviews
43
Career
frustra*on
Low
poten/al
for
advancement:
75%
of
foremen
had
reached
peak
of
their
career
progression
within
the
plant
46
Taking
Ac*on
Transferred
Ashley
Wall,
Director
of
Human
Resources
to
the
Lima
plant
Main
priority
was
to
lower
the
high
turnover
rate
and
job
dissa/sfac/on
among
foreman
Lima
plant
could
be
Threadways
#1
plant
in
produc/vity
and
low
cost
producer
in
North
America
47
Ac*on
Plan
Perspec*ve
Recommenda*ons
Maslows
hierarchy
of
needs
Goal
seWng
theory
Job
characteris/cs
model
Equity
theory
Expectancy
theory
48
49
Adversarial
norms
Foremen
belief
workers
are
not
to
be
trusted
and
are
mo/vated
by
fear
=>
confronta/onal
and
aggressive
behaviors
Flawed
philosophy
Basic
philosophy
at
Lima
is
that
workers
are
extensions
of
the
equipment
and
not
thinkers,
while
the
union
is
the
enemy
Changing
the
way
foremen
do
their
work
will
require
change
in
the
aWtudes
and
prac/ces
of
the
plants
middle/top
managers
Plant
manager
Bellingham
s/ll
views
the
foreman
problem
as
a
personnel
problem,
not
a
line
management
problem
50
Training
Incen/vize
foremen
to
take
short,
focused
training
modules
for
on-the-job
training
in
HRM
skills
Encourage
formal/informal
interac/on
among
foremen
by
pairing
up
foremen
wo
have
dierent
skills
Wall
must
provide
Bellingham
with
a
cost-benet
analysis
to
illustrate
the
net
payback
of
the
training
program
51
52
53
Gradual
Implementa*on
(Long
March)
Speed
of
Change
Slow
54
55