Catch-22 (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 de 6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

Catch-22 (logic)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A catch-22 is a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules.
[1][2] An example would be:
To get a job, you need to have a few years of experience. But in order to gain experience, you need
to get a job first.[3]
Catch-22s often result from rules, regulations, or procedures that an individual is subject to but has no control
over because to fight the rule is to accept it. Another example is a situation in which someone is in need of
something that can only be had by not being in need of it. (A bank will never issue someone a loan if they need
the money.) One connotation of the term is that the creators of the "catch-22" have created arbitrary rules in
order to justify and conceal their own abuse of power.

Contents
1 Origin and meaning
1.1 Other appearances in the novel
1.2 Significance of the number 22
2 Usage
3 Logic
4 See also
4.1 Related stories and logic problems
5 References

Origin and meaning

Joseph Heller coined the term in his 1961 novel Catch-22, which describes absurd bureaucratic constraints on
soldiers in World War II. The term is introduced by the character Doc Daneeka, an army psychiatrist who
invokes "Catch 22" to explain why any pilot requesting mental evaluation for insanityhoping to be found not
sane enough to fly and thereby escape dangerous missionsdemonstrates his own sanity in making the request
and thus cannot be declared insane. This phrase also means a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which
there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions. [4]
"You mean there's a catch?"
"Sure there's a catch," Doc Daneeka replied. "Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat
duty isn't really crazy."
There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's own
safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr
was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no
longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and
sane if he didn't, but if he was sane, he had to fly them. If he flew them, he was crazy and didn't

09/09/2016 13:27

Catch-22 (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2 de 6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

have to; but if he didn't want to, he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the
absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.
Different formulations of "Catch-22" appear throughout the novel. The term is applied to various loopholes and
quirks of the military system, always with the implication that rules are inaccessible to and slanted against those
lower in the hierarchy. In chapter 6, Yossarian is told that Catch-22 requires him to do anything his commanding
officer tells him to do, regardless of whether these orders contradict orders from the officer's superiors. [5]
In a final episode, Catch-22 is described to Yossarian by an old woman recounting an act of violence by soldiers:
[6][7]

"Catch-22 says they have a right to do anything we can't stop them from doing."
"What the hell are you talking about?" Yossarian shouted at her in bewildered, furious protest.
"How did you know it was Catch-22? Who the hell told you it was Catch-22?"
"The soldiers with the hard white hats and clubs. The girls were crying. 'Did we do anything wrong?'
they said. The men said no and pushed them away out the door with the ends of their clubs. 'Then
why are you chasing us out?' the girls said. 'Catch 22,' the men said. All they kept saying was
'Catch-22, Catch-22. What does it mean, Catch 22? What is Catch-22?"
"Didn't they show it to you?" Yossarian demanded, stamping about in anger and distress. "Didn't you
even make them read it?"
"They don't have to show us Catch-22," the old woman answered. "The law says they don't have
to."
"What law says they don't have to?"
"Catch-22."
According to literature professor Ian Gregson, the old woman's narrative defines "Catch-22" more directly as the
"brutal operation of power", stripping away the "bogus sophistication" of the earlier scenarios. [8]

Other appearances in the novel

Besides referring to an unsolvable logical dilemma, Catch-22 is invoked to explain or justify the military
bureaucracy. For example, in the first chapter, it requires Yossarian to sign his name to letters that he censors
while he is confined to a hospital bed. One clause mentioned in chapter 10 closes a loophole in promotions,
which one private had been exploiting to reattain the attractive rank of Private First Class after any promotion.
Through courts-martial for going AWOL, he would be busted in rank back to private, but Catch-22 limited the
number of times he could do this before being sent to the stockade.
At another point in the book, a prostitute explains to Yossarian that she cannot marry him because he is crazy,
and she will never marry a crazy man. She considers any man crazy who would marry a woman who is not a
virgin. This closed logic loop clearly illustrated Catch-22 because by her logic, all men who refuse to marry her
are sane and thus she would consider marriage; but as soon as a man agrees to marry her, he becomes crazy for
wanting to marry a non-virgin, and is instantly rejected.

09/09/2016 13:27

Catch-22 (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

3 de 6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

At one point, Captain Black attempts to press Milo into depriving Major Major of food as a consequence of not
signing a loyalty oath that Major Major was never given an opportunity to sign in the first place. Captain Black
asks Milo, "You're not against Catch-22, are you?"
In chapter 40, Catch-22 forces Colonels Korn and Cathcart to promote Yossarian to Major and ground him
rather than simply sending him home. They fear that if they do not, others will refuse to fly, just as Yossarian
did.

Significance of the number 22

Heller originally wanted to call the phrase (and hence, the book) by other numbers, but he and his publishers
eventually settled on 22. The number has no particular significance; it was chosen more or less for euphony. The
title was originally Catch-18, but Heller changed it after the popular Mila 18 was published a short time
beforehand.[9][10]

Usage
The term "catch-22" has filtered into common usage in the English language. [2] In a 1975 interview, Heller said
the term would not translate well into other languages. [10]
James E. Combs and Dan D. Nimmo suggest that the idea of a "catch-22" has gained popular currency because
so many people in modern society are exposed to frustrating bureaucratic logic. They write:
Everyone, then, who deals with organizations understands the bureaucratic logic of Catch-22. In
high school or college, for example, students can participate in student government, a form of
self-government and democracy that allows them to decide whatever they want, just so long as the
principal or dean of students approves. This bogus democracy that can be overruled by arbitrary fiat
is perhaps a citizen's first encounter with organizations that may profess 'open' and libertarian
values, but in fact are closed and hierarchical systems. Catch-22 is an organizational assumption, an
unwritten law of informal power that exempts the organization from responsibility and
accountability, and puts the individual in the absurd position of being excepted for the convenience
or unknown purposes of the organization.[7]
Along with George Orwell's "doublethink", "Catch-22" has become one of the best-recognized ways to describe
the predicament of being trapped by contradictory rules. [11]

Logic
The archetypal catch-22, as formulated by Heller, involves the case of John Yossarian, a U.S. Army Air Forces
bombardier, who wishes to be grounded from combat flight. This will only happen if he is evaluated by the
squadron's flight surgeon and found "unfit to fly". "Unfit" would be any pilot who is willing to fly such dangerous
missions, as one would have to be mad to volunteer for possible death. However, to be evaluated, he must
request the evaluation, an act that is considered sufficient proof for being declared sane. These conditions make
it impossible to be declared "unfit".
The "Catch-22" is that "anyone who wants to get out of combat duty isn't really crazy". [12] Hence, pilots who
request a mental fitness evaluation are sane, and therefore must fly in combat. At the same time, if an evaluation

09/09/2016 13:27

Catch-22 (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

4 de 6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

is not requested by the pilot, he will never receive one and thus can never be found insane, meaning he must also
fly in combat.
Therefore, Catch-22 ensures that no pilot can ever be grounded for being insane even if he is.
A logical formulation of this situation is:
1.

For a person to be excused from flying (E) on the

grounds of insanity, they must both be insane (I) and
have requested an evaluation (R).

(premise)

2.

An insane person (I) does not request an evaluation

(R) because they do not realize they are insane.

(premise)

3.

Every person is either not insane (I) or does not

request an evaluation (R).

(2. and material implication)

4.

No person can be both insane (I) and request an

evaluation (R).

(3. and De Morgan's laws)

5.

Therefore, no person can be excused from flying (E)

because no person can be both insane and have
requested an evaluation.

(4., 1. and modus tollens)

The philosopher[13] Laurence Goldstein argues that the "airman's dilemma" is logically not even a condition that
is true under no circumstances; it is a "vacuous biconditional" that is ultimately meaningless. Goldstein writes: [14]
The catch is this: what looks like a statement of the conditions under which an airman can be
excused flying dangerous missions reduces not to the statement
(i) `An airman can be excused flying dangerous missions if and only if Cont (where `Cont is
a contradiction)
(which could be a mean way of disguising an unpleasant truth), but to the worthlessly empty
announcement
(ii) `An airman can be excused flying dangerous missions if and only if it is not the case that
an airman can be excused flying dangerous missions
If the catch were (i), that would not be so bad an airman would at least be able to discover that
under no circumstances could he avoid combat duty. But Catch-22 is worse a welter of words that
amounts to nothing; it is without content, it conveys no information at all.

See also
Begging the question
Cornelian dilemma
Deadlock
Double bind
False dilemma

Ironic process theory

List of paradoxes
Mu
No-win situation
Pyrrhic victory

09/09/2016 13:27

Catch-22 (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

5 de 6

Social trap
Strange loop

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

Suicide
Vicious circle

Related stories and logic problems

Hobson's choice Choice between taking what is offered and taking nothing; named after James Hobson,
owner of a livery stable who required his customers to take the horse nearest the door or no horse at all.
Kobayashi Maru A scenario involving a choice presented to a cadet in Star Trek
The Lady, or the Tiger? A short story involving a princess who must make a decision in a no-win
situation
Morton's fork
Ninety-ninety rule
Zugzwang

References
1. "Catch-22". Random House Dictionary. Random House. 2012.
2. "Catch 22 (http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/catch-22)", Oxford Advanced Learners'
Dictionary, accessed 16 August 2013.
3. Smith, Jacquelyn. "When An Employer Requires Experience And You Have None". Forbes. 9 May 2012. Retrieved
8 August 2016.
4. Scriptures for a Generation: What We Were Reading in the '60s - Page 162 Philip D. Beidler - 1995 "It is Catch-22:
Doc Daneeka explains how anybody who is crazy has a right to ask to be removed from combat status but how
anybody who asks is"
5. Margot A. Henriksen, Dr. Strangelove's America: Society and Culture in the Atomic Age; University of California
Press, 1997; ISBN 0-520-08310-5; p. 250 (http://books.google.com/books?id=KGrsQOIQgeYC&lpg=PP1&
pg=PA250#v=onepage&q&f=false).
6. "Joseph Heller (http://www.answers.com/topic/joseph-heller)", Gale Encyclopedia of Biography, accessed via
Answers.com, 16 August 2013.
7. James E. Combs & Dan D. Nimmo, The Comedy of Democracy; Westport, CT: Praeger (Greenwood Publishing
Group), 1996; ISBN 0-275-94979-6; p. 152 (http://books.google.com/books?id=VJw9OdBFgmgC&lpg=PP1&
pg=PA152#v=onepage&q&f=false).
8. Ian Gregson, Character and Satire in Post War Fiction; London: Continuum, 2006; ISBN 9781441130006; p. 38
(http://books.google.com/books?id=e0qqaRTVt_sC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA38#v=onepage&q&f=false).
9. Aldridge, John W. (1986-10-26). "The Loony Horror of it All 'Catch-22' Turns 25". The New York Times.
p. Section 7, Page 3, Column 1. Retrieved 2011-01-09.
10. "A classic by any other name (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3669372/A-classic-by-any-other-name.html)", The
Telegraph, 18 November 2007.
11. Richard King, "22 Going on 50: Half a century later, the world is full of Catch-22s (http://thesmartset.com/article
/article07181101.aspx)"; The Smart Set, 20 July 2011.
12. Heller, Joseph (1999). Catch-22: A Novel. Simon and Schuster. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-684-86513-3. Retrieved
2011-01-09.
13. http://www.kent.ac.uk/campusonline/people/campusnews.html?id=laurence-goldstein-condolences.txt
14. Laurence Goldstein, "The Barber, Russell's paradox, catch-22, God, contradiction and more: A defence of a
Wittgensteinian conception of contradiction (http://philpapers.org/rec/GOLTBR)"; in The law of non-contradiction:
new philosophical essays, ed. Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb; Oxford University Press, 2004.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catch-22_(logic)&oldid=734656462"

Categories: Catch-22 Dilemmas English-language idioms Metaphors referring to war and violence
Metaphors Paradoxes

09/09/2016 13:27

Catch-22 (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

6 de 6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

This page was last modified on 15 August 2016, at 20:48.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may
apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

09/09/2016 13:27