Está en la página 1de 8

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 1 of 8

AO 93 (Rev 11/13) Search and Seizure Wamnt

UNITED STATES DI

In the Matter of the Search of


(Briefly describe the property to be searched
or identify the person by l'ft1nfe and address)

18 electronic devices, currently in law enforcement


possession, as further described in Attached A hereto

Case No.

'16 -MC-Z 17 ~.

SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT


To:

Any authorized law enforcement officer

An application by a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government requests the search
of the following person or property located in the
District of
Oregon
(identify the person or describe the properly to be searched and give its location):

18 electronic devices, currently in law enforcement possession, as described in Attachment A hereto,

I find that the a:ffidavit(s), or any recorded testimony, establish probable cause to search and seize the person or property
described above, and that such search will reveal (identifY the person or describe the property to be seized):
The information and items set forth in Attachment B hereto.

~(,,

YOU ARE COMMANDED to =cute thin"'""' on a< before .


2-QI(,.
(""' mo1 u """)
gf at any time in the day o f t l i u s e good cause has been established.

0 in the daytime 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Unless delayed notice is authorized below, you must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the
person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken, or leave the copy and receipt at the place where the
property was taken.
'
'fbe officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during ~exec
n fthe warrant, must prepare an inventory
as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to _ _,_,,\1=t-'l"""'_""'r;.'-F'-""-=~--"-1_4'--....-.;..;:lek.!:"-=:;__-----

nited States Mogistrau Judge)

0 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3103a(b), I find that immediate notification may have an adverse result listed in 18 U.S.C.
2705 (except for delay of trial), and authorize the officer executing this warrant to delay notice to the person who, or whose
property, will be searched or seized (check the appropriate box)
0 for _ _ 4ays (not to exceed 30)
until, the facts j
te of -

Date and time issued:

City and state:

2 - /l,.

e.

Portland, Oregon

I Papak, United States Magistrate Judge


Printed name and title

c'X'11.rllrr :2..
Dissemination Limited by Court Order

MNWR 0059691

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 2 of 8

A093 (Rcv. llfl3)ScarchandSeizureWarrant(Page2}

Case No.:

Return

Date and time warrant executed:

Copy of warrant and inventory left with:

Inventory made in the presence of:


Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seiz.ed:

Certification

I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventozy is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the
designated judge.

Date:
Executing officer's signature

Printed name ONi title

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

MNWR 0059692

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 3 of 8

ATT ACllMENT A
Property to Be Searched
The items to be searched are the following Subject Devices:

I.

Seized during the January 26, 2016, arrest of PAYNE, R. BUNDY, and S. COX (Devices
1-17):
1.

One (1) Sanyo digital camera, model E2100, serial number 11091011182,

with one 64 GB SanDisk Ultra PLUS Micro SD card (Device 1).


2.

One (1) Apple iPad with cover (Device 4).

3.

One (1) Sansa SanDisk storage device (Device 8).

4.

One (1) black Canon Vixia HF RSO camera, serial number 782914204885,

containing one (1) 32GB SanDisk Ultra memory card (Device 9).
5.

One (1) black and red colored 16 GB SanDisk memory card with the name

"Bundy" handwritten on one side (Device 11).


6.

One (1) Kodak 4GB SD memory card (Device 11).

7.

One (1) black 16GB SanDisk thumb drive USB 3.0(Device13).

8.

One (1) red 2 GB Verbatim. thumb drive bearing identification number

11090904002650AAX (Device 14).


9.

One (1) SanDisk MicroMate containing one (1) 32 GB SD card (Device

10.

One (1) a white disc labeled "Targeted Individual Myron May Speaks

15).

From The Grave. Another Victim of the NWO Agenda." (Device 17).

II I

Page 1- Attachment A

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

USAO Version Rev. July 2015

MNWR 0059693

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

II.

III.

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 4 of 8

Seized pursuant to the January 27, 2016, arrest of PATRICK (Devices 18-25):
1.

One (1) SanDisk 32GB memory card (Device 20).

2.

One (1) Sony IC recorder, ICD-PX312 (Device 21).

3.

One (1) silver Canon PowerShot Elph 160 camera (Device 22).

4.

One (1) Verbatim 32GB SD memory card (Device 23).

5.

One (1) Canon VixiaHFR62 camera, serial number 902074103090 (Device 24).

Seized during the February 11, 2016, arrest of KJAR (Devices 27-29):
1.

One (I) silver MacBook laptop with a sticker across the top of the laptop that reads

"FACTOR 55 Precision Engineering," model Al278, PN identification number 0857323,


MLC identification number DA2611 (Device 27).
IV.

Seized pursuant to February 18, 2016, search of a Chevrolet Tahoe (Device 31):
1.

One (1) brown-colored Toshiba laptop, serial number 3A830554K, model number

NB305-N410BN (Device 31).


V.

Seized during the January 27, 2016, arrest of EHMER (Devices 36 and 37):
l.

One (1) SamsWig tablet, serial number R52F708RQJR (Device 36).

Devices 1 through 8 are currently in storage at the Deschutes County Sheriff's Office,
63333 West Highway 20, Bend, Oregon 97703.
Devices 9 through 39 are currently in storage at the FBI Portland Field Office, 9109 NE
Cascades Parkway, Portland, Oregon 97220.

Page 2 -Attachment A

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

USAO Version Rev. July 2015

MNWR 0059694

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 5 of 8

ATIACHMENT B
Items to Be Seized
1.

----

All records on the Subject Devices described in Attachment A that relate to

violations of the following crimes: a Conspiracy to Impede Officers of the United States, in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3 72; Possession of Firearms and Dangerous
Weapons in Federal Facilities, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 930(b) and
2; Use and Carry of a Firearm in Relation to a Crime of Violence, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Sections 924(c) and 2; Theft of Government Property, in violation of Title 18,
United States Code, Section 641; and Depredation of Government Property, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1361 involving Ammon BUNDY, Jon RITZHEIMER,
Joseph O'SHAUGHNESSY, Ryan PAYNE, Ryan BUNDY, Brian CAVALIER, Shawna COX,
Peter SANmLI, Robert Lavoy Finicum, Jason PATRICK, Duane Leo EHMER, Dylan
ANDERSON, Sean ANDERSON, David Lee FRY, Jeff Wayne BANTA, Sandra Lynn
ANDERSON, Kenneth MEDENBACH, Blaine COOPER, Wesley KJAR, Corey LEQUIEU,
Neil WAMPLER, Jason Charles BLOMGREN, Darryl William THORN, Geoffrey STANEK,
Travis COX, Eric Lee FLORES, Jake RYAN, Victoria Sharp, and Brand Nu Thornton since
November 1, 2015, including:

a.

Financial records, cancelled checks, cashier's checks and money order

records, wire transfer records, records of credit card and automatic teller machine

--

activity, including credit and/or debit cards related to travel to or from or occupation of
the Malheur Wildlife National Refuge.

I II

Page l - Attachment B

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

USAO Version Rev. October 2015

MNWR 0059695

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

b.

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 6 of 8

Calendar books, log books, appointment books, and telephone number

listings reflecting appointments, meetings, and travel schedules.


c.

Documents reflecting travel expenditures to include copies of travel

tickets, hotel bills, gas receipts, and copies of paymen~ items comprising evidence of
expenditures and liabilities.
d.

Correspondence and communications between the above-referenced

individuals.
e.

Photographs, video and audio recordings, records, and social media posts

related to the planning, takeover, and occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife
Refuge and the above-referenced individuals' presence in Harney County, Oregon.
f.

Information related to the possession, sale, transfer, and/or use of firearms

and/or dangerous weapons.


g.

Contact lists, including e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, names, and

addresses.
2.

Evidence of user attribution showing who used or owned the Subject Devices at

the time the things described in this warrant were created, edited, or deleted, such as logs,
phonebooks, saved usemames and passwords, documents, and browsing history.
3.

Records evidencing the use of the Internet, including:

a.

Records of Internet Protocol addresses used.

b.

Records of Internet activity, including firewall logs, caches, browser

history and cookies, "bookmarked" or "favorite" web pages, search terms that the user
entered into any Internet search engine, and records of user-typed web addresses.

Page 2 - Attachment B

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

USAO Version Rev. October 2015

MNWR 0059696

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

c.
4.

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 7 of 8

Records of data storage accounts and use of data storage accounts.

As used above, the terms "records" and "information" include all of the foregoing

items of evidence in whatever form and by whatever means they may have been created or
stored, including any form of computer or electronic storage (such as flash memory or other
media that can store data) and any photographic form.

Search Procedure
5.

The examination of the Subject Devices may require authorities to employ

techniques, including but not limited to computer-assisted scans of the entire medium, that might
expose many parts of the Subject Devices to human inspection in order to determine whether it is
evidence described by the warrant.
6.

The initial examination of the Subject Devices will be performed within a

reasonable amount of time not to exceed 120 days from the date of execution of the warrant. If
the government needs additional time to conduct this review, it may seek an extension of the
time period from the Court within the original 120-day period from the date of execution of the
warrant. The government shall complete this review within 180 days of the date of execution of
the warrant. If the government needs additional time to complete this review, it may seek an
extension of the time period from the Court.
7.

If, at the conclusion of the examination, law enforcement personnel determine

that particular files or file folders on the Subject Devices or images do not contain any data
falling within the scope of the warrant, they will not search or examine those files or folders
further without authorization from the Court. Law enforcement personnel may continue to
examine files or data falling within the purview of the warrant, as well as data within the

Page 3 - Attachment B

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

USAO Version Rev. October 2015

MNWR 0059697

Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR

Document 1240-2

Filed 09/12/16

Page 8 of 8

operating system, file system, software application, etc., relating to files or data that fall within
the scope of the warrant, through the conclusion of the case.
8.

-------

If an examination is conducted, and it is determined that the Subject Device does

?
I

not contain any data falling within the ambit of the warrant, the government will return the
Device to its owner within a reasonable period of time following the search and will seal any
image of the Subject Device, absent further authorization from the Court.
9.

The government may retain the Subject Devices as evidence, fruits, contraband,

or an instrumentality of a crime or to commence forfeiture proceedings against the Devices


and/or the data contained therein.
10.

The government will retain a forensic image of the Subject Devices for a number

of reasons, including proving the authenticity of evidence to be used at trial, responding to


questions regarding the corruption of data, establishing the chain of custody of data, refuting
claims of fabricating, tampering, or destroying data, and addressing potential exculpatory
evidence claims where, for example, a defendant claims that the government avoided its
obligations by destroying data or returning it to a third party.

Page 4 - Attachment B

Dissemination Limited by Court Order

USAO Version Rev. October 2015

MNWR 0059698

También podría gustarte