Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Std. Deviation
2.42
.867
100
.3600
.48242
100
Correlations
A2
A2
Pearson Correlation
B8a_1
1
-.124
Sig. (2-tailed)
.220
N
B8a_1
Pearson Correlation
100
100
-.124
Sig. (2-tailed)
.220
100
100
0.220>0.01---not significant
There is no relationship between Tesco and premium price.
Std. Deviation
2.42
.867
100
.3000
.46057
100
Correlations
A2
A2
Pearson Correlation
B8b_2
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
B8b_2
-.116
.249
100
100
Pearson Correlation
-.116
Sig. (2-tailed)
.249
100
100
0.249>0.01---not significant
There is no relationship between Giant and premium price.
Std. Deviation
2.42
.867
100
.1700
.37753
100
Correlations
A2
A2
B8c_3
Pearson Correlation
.150
Sig. (2-tailed)
B8c_3
.136
100
100
Pearson Correlation
.150
Sig. (2-tailed)
.136
100
100
0.136>0.01---not significant
There is no relationship between Aeon and premium price.
Std. Deviation
2.42
.867
100
.0400
.19695
100
Correlations
A2
A2
Pearson Correlation
B8d_4
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
B8d_4
Pearson Correlation
-.159
.115
100
100
-.159
Sig. (2-tailed)
.115
100
100
0.115>0.01---not significant
There is no relationship between Aeon Big and premium price.
Std. Deviation
2.42
.867
100
.1300
.33800
100
Correlations
A2
A2
Pearson Correlation
B8e_5
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
B8e_5
Pearson Correlation
.260**
.009
100
100
**
.260
Sig. (2-tailed)
.009
100
100
0.009<0.01---significant
There is relationship between Cold Storage and premium price.
MULTINOMIAL LOGIT
Nominal Regression
Warnings
Unexpected singularities in the Hessian matrix are encountered. This indicates that either some
predictor variables should be excluded or some categories should be merged.
The NOMREG procedure continues despite the above warning(s). Subsequent results shown are
based on the last iteration. Validity of the model fit is uncertain.
A1
Percentage
RM5.00/10 eggs
14
14.0%
RM5.50/10 eggs
41
41.0%
RM6.00/10 eggs
34
34.0%
RM6.50/10 eggs
11
11.0%
Organic
29
29.0%
Selenium
4.0%
Antibiotic-Free
6.0%
61
61.0%
100
100.0%
Omega-3
Valid
Missing
Total
100
Subpopulation
-2 Log Likelihood
Intercept Only
37.325
Final
27.063
Chi-Square
df
10.263
Sig.
.330
Pseudo R-Square
Cox and Snell
.098
Nagelkerke
.106
McFadden
.041
-2 Log Likelihood
Effect
Intercept
of Reduced Model
27.063
Chi-Square
.000
df
Sig.
0
A1
37.325
10.263
.330
Parameter Estimates
95% Confidence Interval for Exp(B)
A2a
RM5.00/10 eggs
RM5.50/10 eggs
RM6.00/10 eggs
Std. Error
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Intercept
.154
.556
.077
.782
[A1=1.0]
-.154
.842
.033
.855
.857
.164
4.467
[A1=2.0]
19.536
1.301
225.452
.000
305076482.539
23818353.376
3907560641.553
[A1=3.0]
.087
9535.591
.000
1.000
1.091
.000
.b
[A1=4.0]
0c
Intercept
1.540
.450
11.725
.001
[A1=1.0]
-.847
.709
1.429
.232
.429
.107
1.719
[A1=2.0]
17.457
1.444
146.105
.000
38134560.317
2249123.407
646582880.170
[A1=3.0]
16.898
7135.783
.000
.998
21822597.748
.000
.b
[A1=4.0]
0c
Intercept
1.204
.465
6.690
.010
[A1=1.0]
-.616
.726
.719
.396
.540
.130
2.243
[A1=2.0]
17.793
.000
53388384.444
53388384.444
53388384.444
[A1=3.0]
17.928
7135.783
.000
.998
61103273.693
.000
.b
[A1=4.0]
0c