Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
1/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
THIRD DIVISION.
2/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
10
3/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
11
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001566f0b3e5372659b40003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
P7,000.00. Consequently, on February 20, 1956,
TCT Nos.
4/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
5
Exhibit 27.
Exhibit BAlvarez.
Exh. 2Alvarez.
12
12
de Fuentebella
sold said lots for P6,000.00 to Rosendo
9
Alvarez. Hence, on April 1, 1958. TCT Nos. T23165 and T
23166 covering Lots 773A
and 773B were respectively
10
issued to Rosendo Alvarez.
Two years later or on May 26, 1960, Teodora Yanes and
the children of her brother Rufino, namely, Estelita,
Iluminado and Jesus, filed in the Court of First Instance of
Negros Occidental a complaint against Fortunato Santiago,
Arsenia Vda. de Fuentebella, Alvarez and the Register of
Deeds of Negros Occidental for the return of the
ownership and possession of Lots 773 and 823. They also
prayed that an accounting of the produce of the land from
1944 up to the filing of the complaint be made by the
defendants, that after court approval of said accounting,
the share or money equivalent due the plaintiffs be
delivered to them, and that defendants be ordered to pay
plaintiffs
P500.00 as damages in the form of attorneys
11
fees.
During the pendency in court of said case or on
November 13, 1961, Alvarez sold Lots 773A, 773B and
12
another lot for P25,000.00 to Dr. Rodolfo Siason.
Accordingly, TCT Nos. 30919 and 30920 were issued to
13
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001566f0b3e5372659b40003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
Siason, who, thereafter, declared the two lots
in his name
5/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
13
Exh. 3Alvarez.
10
Exh. 2Siason.
11
12
Exhibit F.
13
14
15
Exhibit 4Alvarez.
13
13
6/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
17
Exhibit E.
18
19
20
Exhibit 5.
14
14
7/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
Exhibit 6.
22
Exhibit 78.
23
Exhibit 9.
24
25
26
15
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001566f0b3e5372659b40003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
Alvarez and Siason was without court approval.
The
8/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
28
The
SO ORDERED.
Ibid., p. 63.
28
29
30
16
9/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
Rollo, p. 32.
32
Rollo, p. 32.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001566f0b3e5372659b40003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
10/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
17
17
11/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
_______________
33
Rollo, p. 119.
34
Rollo, p. 27.
35
36
Ngo Bun Tiong v. Judge Sayo, G.R. No. 45825, June 30, 1988.
18
18
12/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
appealed in the former case but they did not. They have
therefore foreclosed their rights, if any, and they
________________
37
38
Rollo, p. 27.
39
40
Ibid.
19
19
13/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
89). The reason is that whatever payment is thus made from the
state is ultimately a payment by the heirs or distributees, since
the amount of the paid claim in fact diminishes or reduces the
shares that the heirs would have been entitled to receive.
Under our law, therefore, the general rule is that a partys
contractual rights and obligations are transmissible to the
successors.
_______________
41
20
20
14/15
8/9/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME185
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001566f0b3e5372659b40003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
15/15