Está en la página 1de 8
CHART , PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPE Complainant worstty CRIM. CASE NOIR. 7078 POR: Violation of RA D208 TERESITA LEGASEL VDA (Aaiistaflicking on Persons DENARI AN, Acta 2003) ouseal, JUDGMENT In an Amenled foforanation, ie Gitte Prosecutor af Beiwe (its accuses TERESTTA LVGASPL VDA, BU NAKILAN of the urime of Quolitied Trotiieking umlor Sec. 6/5) and (©) in relation ty See. day allegedly committed as follows: “The wlerigned Assistine City Brosgeutoe af Irigy City tml acouses one TERESUIA LEGASPI WIA. DE NAKILAM, wha ea resident of Brgy. Botdevard, Isla Voile: Dave city, fue presently delainoad at the triga City Police Station, Iriga City. af QUALIFIED TRAPFICKING nde be erin of He fay Ya) ane penalized under Seo Mikey of REPLIBLIC ACH eee othoreive kaw as ~ Sati“frafieksing in Berson: Avt of 2002" ander Sve, Ala) and penalized under See. 6(ay thereat’ commitied as toilows: Phat in the aferagen of fanmary 11. 2095 at the PULLTRANCO pines anal sithin Sie jurtsdhetion of this nak, Liga City Pia Honorable Court, the akeve-namied scawsed. lid, thew and Uneve willthily, wolacetlty aad telunionsty commit quatitied trafficking by eeoruitieg, and tqensparting the fatloscsigt complainartenionars Naw aD i ae yea 14 sears oleh —_ 15 years ol TE — 13 pears nl Age under the protest ainiagemplayment ia tapen or emplovment in Cavite for ths purnse of exptoitotion, in violation of thy provision of said Tay and io thy 1 ane prejauticn of said complainants amd ei Ramities in the ammyunt that aes be preven 10 cout SCTS CONTRARY TO LAW" Trial on the merits of the cae coinmenced atic accused pleadiosd nos gui te the inietneat, ‘ The prmecution preseuies The defense souseqquentiy filed y Demuirer to vas subsequently denied by the cone in an order dal Sune 15. 2611 Phe avis ws disclosed by the MD MMM tested tint she is G&S moto A is one of the minorcomphsinont eho. sve only tvelye years ab then in this gose, She testified meng uthera that che is @ side walk: vendor frou Ila Verde, fwvae City On fine 2 nocused Torun kiln wou to ace fer vende she was st maker io seh hey tha be vill bring her eaneiter to Mamita fo work, That her daughter ill thst i evemtnally will yo tn Japan to work, But she told Teresita practi GBD ic 25 with her onside seal her to schoo! Gall alse: eh weve, OM did not days alier that, She eventually ieamed fiom ber al she will nat aflow may that she is still her mother that she will aot go with Porosity, Hh go home for thre and t nis daghter itl ter's {rier aeouse dawg! nephew th 3, che immediatly weil went with loresits, Nekalan, Upen learning to the: office -of Philaranco in Davao where it was reported thet theyboarded the dus bound for Manila. She brought with her a picture of her daughter and showed if to a Philtrmes personel whe confined that her di wns one of the four girls who were identified only SAMy Semi 15 yours od, ond KA May NEM L years old coamed. whe wee with Teresita the other adinor-complainants in this case, aamuely; who happens to bs aise the alece « Nakijon. ® ‘ CBN to asked for On Janvary £1, 2003, she then went to AB! assistance, ABS-CRN called the 2 «manages and reqestec! fhat the departure fms be tek at the Hign City Philtranco station. AD 3:00 o'clock in the a AeA. Sem womber of the f VALS P02 Ve AGE were dispatched by SPO] to Philtranco Teminal to render assistance for the ene moou of the sane day, SPO2 together with PO3 Lot aconsed ead tor vielation of RA 9028, m ‘Forsita Nakilon who is being and thar accused axl the asinors were all boarded i the Plufirincy bus sion of the bas and wpun they ure to apprehend, Upon o esta Nebilsn and the ainor soutiemation thar xecused complainants were disc as pmsenguis, they were asked io alight the bus and were bronyht to the PRP-iriga. ‘The following day, they were 103 2 Lepaspt Vile de ie brought to the DEW} at Sorsogon City On Bebriey 3 2 MMB end all the other miner wag where they siayed ai the complainants were able to return te DSWD of friva City Kae iS GEEEEP, firteon ves one at the minor complainants in this cute, lestified that she personally: knows accused Teresita Nakilan, she being her aunt, She further testified that 20S. sceused ita Mukilaa cof Janna sometime in ihe mor ¢ hor to irain there o gan with her tes Me aposstl invited fier that she will be given work at Japon, Acoused prom and jewel allowances, getl phone ies. By those promises, she was sed until they were apprehended encotzaged end went with thi: ac She also executed a sort statement while at the PMP-lriga City office vogarding the incident which was ainrked as Exhibit Bt Be Up. Wo record) be the prosecution, Al the. other minor complainaris aamcly Cal Mee T ie yD i Sep SED when pres prosecution witnesses. all testified the same thing. ‘That they were peal ty mtd as consort Teresita Nakilan te go with har io Manifa to inn nos there, ‘They were promised ining . and that they will be fo be given allowances vent 5 promised! thon a high salary. money and jowebrins sed had onty herself ax withons vt iakilua when, she lestitied tast March the deiense, Accu rigor comploinapts in this 20, 2012, admitted that she knows aff the she roernited ant On croseexaminatinn, she People vs. Tes Vida de Nakilon hey qave their consent. She however te sported the minors beeans donicd having knowledge thet the complsinants are minors. She further alleged thet Jnot fares them: to go with her and ih intention wis only lo give the complainants jobs siuce bis in Davan ws: th her beoawse she told thene that :at the rainars ageovd lo gov they will receive ab in Manila, She further alleged that, tho parents of the minars she recruited and tamspettod algo gave their censent Seetion 3a} uf Kepublie Act No. 9208 (RA 9208), othensise knowe as the Anti-Trajjicking in Pexsons Act of 2003, defines Trafficking in Persons, as foltews Trafficking in Persons — rafers io Wwe recruitment, tramspartation, transfor or harboring, or receipt of persons with or without the viction’s consent or Knowledge, within or across national borders hy means of threat or use of free, or ether forms of'courcion, abduction, fraud, deception, obtuse of paver oe af position, taking advuntag ok the vielteruhility of the person, 0) vig of pocvments or benefits ta achiew the consent of « person having control aver another person for the pargose of exploitation sehich factades at a mmininiin, the exploitation ov the prostitution of others or ober forms of sexual expios Ge memowed or sale civiingy OF F ahem, finer! leben 04 ces, slavery, servitude ar plied The reomitint, ieanspurtation, iransfer, savboring a” relay of @ ohitd for she prurpese of « dared as * waffickiag i p. vet forth in vive} Section J of RA 2208 enumerates the probibiied aets of Trogheking in Persons, one of whieh is. ine recruit teaiport trons, forbur orevide, or we those dene under the pre purson By any seus. 1 lex oy anscas enploveewst er traning or apprenticeship, for agrupi, ses exploitation, Jorved domestic of 0 ihe purpose of prostitution, por debor skivery, invulunhiry servitndes or keh? hevsehaze The evar of Teugficking ia Section ben) of BA 9208: cauidifiedd when, as provvicin in 4) When tiie: traffic ov fxr ohtiteds Auni- Trafficking in Per a nove kaw May 2003, designed 17 uriuninatize the act of raieking im persons for prostibition, sexual exploitation, Hbrecd labor and slave among, olers. In this cose sconsed only delouse is that she recruited and transported the miners because the miner complainants and theic fd gut have panents gave their consent 3 »cloimed thet she Enowledge that (iv: oomplainanis ave cainors. But the testimony of the minor complainants that they were invited by accused te work os catertainers in Jnpan where they have in by irsined first and by; promising them thet she soll phones 21m H be given Jewett higher salary constitutes violation oF the act. “The lasy doas not also require consent of those resruited and transported, more sa because ‘This is evidence on tie cage are sli mines the vievims in th te of Live Hirth gubmitied end presented by the prose (Eshibit SE" to SH" 322 fo 334 of read Fratfickiag in Persone under Sections 3a) and dof RA V2 alse not oaly minmited ta inmspertation of vicilms, but also mefiules vietinis for te Aweused ‘enila the aot of reer oni Nakilan heesel! adivitied wien she lestitied in court, that shy invited © iners in Japan, Her delinse that the the minuzs to work as ent mranes andl there respociive narcult aave thet eomeosd camel he giver ait over with the ung in Parsons can es oredenst pe crime of Praftu victim's consent or knowledge under Section Ha) of KA 9208, Vide ake Moki Valu ade Mobiles Consequently, singe it has been sufficiently proven heyand reasonable doubt that oecused Teresita Wakilan invited and sauiewrs by we in fapan by her Iranspored admiisien beracif aad fy the char stegorical testimanies of the enmpleinants, her guilt was suite Vine cours did wat find credible the alibi of the aueused over the candlid, positite and convincing testimony of complainants WHE BEFORE, ja RESITA LEGAZPE VDA. DI) NAKILAN guilty beyond Igment is herchy rendered finding the aceused teasonable doubt of the Crine of Yrallicking in Persons defined under Sox, 6(a) and in relation fo Sec, Aa} ond penalized under foo, Wife af) Republic Act Mo. 9202 known as ihe “Anti-Trafticking in Persons Act cof 2003" Section Hic) of RA GBM provides fof the psnd of anaitieg tratlicking: JAny pesson found gailty of qnaitins iraitieks Seotion 6 shall al eof tt fess han fy suifer yt Hie tapriseniees iniflion pews (PIRKLGOEGS fst aot more tine Hive mallion ACD, CN, Si ‘wor A LECASPL VDA DE ndingly. aseused TER, NAKE sof Lilt tnprisonment AN ts sentenced te siftor dhe pena andl a fine of Tao ylifion pesos (.000.00.08}, Conseeentty Moral Damages aud Dixon ¥y Dameiges are abso aves sh fright, serious ary, “Thou ge, meet 8 dhe Makilan oF pecuniary compntation, smoral danny soos on the other humnd, dre awarded iu addition Exemplary aly damages, bE way of example oF womeetion te the gayment oi fir the public yoo, as etned i the Civil ode uposed, by way ition fo the avel Art, 22 Be sortie dareaagzest fuple or correction fbr the yublic good, is ae faniperate, Hquidaled or compensatory darcaiges paival afte wos, excmnplary damages a a part of th: its samy be imspened soheas at crime vias cosninanted wily umiances, Suei damages are nail be paicie the witended! pats. Art, 2230, te civit one oF more aggravating ch and distinct Seon fines acd oparate edd is ortarad to pay each of the miner ni of PSO,QUK) DF as mecat damages tind the Hence, ae complainants ihe aazoue amount of P20.080.00 ws Jor eseasplary damages. SO ORDERED. Sivan in ot ) ROOTKIT E, DACARA Poking daly

También podría gustarte