Está en la página 1de 336

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


IN RE:

Case No. CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

: Lower Case No. MJ-38120-CR-0000381-2015


:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
KATHLEEN KANE

:
:

REQUEST THE COURTESY OF THE COURT TO APPEAR PRO SE AND TO FILE


AN AMICUS CURAIE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE FOLLOWING
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, request for Appearance to file an Amicus in the above captioned case to support the
following:
1.

Quashing the charges in case Montgomery Court Case No. 8423-15

2. In support of any other relief this Court deems just and proper.
The following Amicus should provide this Court with the proper jurisdiction for legal standing
to consider this Amicus according to Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure.

Rule 531. Participation by Amicus Curiae.


(a) Briefs.Anyone interested in the questions involved in any matter pending in an appellate court,
excluding Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, although not a party, may, without applying for leave to
do so, file a brief amicus curiae in regard to those questions.
(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, any amicus curiae shall file and serve its brief in the
manner and number required and within the time allowed by these rules with respect to the party
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 1 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 2 of 336


whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief will support, or with respect to the
appellant, if the amicus brief does not support the position of any party.

(2) In an appeal proceeding under Rules 2154(b), 2185(c) and 2187(b), any amicus curiae shall file
and serve its brief within the time allowed by these rules for service of the advance text of the brief
by the party whose position as to affirmance or reversal the amicus brief will support or, if the amicus
brief does not support the position of any party, within the time allowed by these rules for service of
the advance text by the appellant. Alternatively, the amicus curiae may, but is not required to, serve
an advance text and then file and serve a definitive copy of its brief. If the amicus curiae chooses to
serve an advance copy and then file and serve a definitive copy, its deadlines for each are the same
as for the party whose position as to affirm and or reversal the amicus brief supports or, if the
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 2 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 3 of 336

July 12, 2016

Respectfully,

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court
of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case
No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 3 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 4 of 336


AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL)
MOTION TO DISMISS CHARGES BASED ON SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE
PROSECUTION
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as also being a victim of SELECTIVE AND
VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster County
District Attorney's Office dating back to the myriad of prosecutions by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in 1987, 2005, and 2006 while a resident of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Most of which have been dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according
to law are false arrests and false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the
United States v. International Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991.
This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and
opinion that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large. The matters presented in
this amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's
(Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which
affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The

Attorney General has been quoted as

saying she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written
extensively about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an interview with
Brian Taff of WPVI on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying Everybody
makes mistakes. I knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea
how deep and how powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on and I
wasn't silent about it and that I am determined to tear that down, I think that's what my
legacy will show.
In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following This story was perpetuated
through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law
enforcement community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as
well as community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights
for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All
in the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole
Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from
escaping beyond the confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from
the days of this country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 4 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 5 of 336


away from the intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total
disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity,
like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and
bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes this said
court to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions
against the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. In addition attached are supporting documents
to advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT.

These documents are attached as

EXHIBITS.
Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control,
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f=Lancaster-County-TheCIA-by-Stan-Caterbone-091125-169.html
In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and
stated the following Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security
Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I
had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car.
He introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they
would not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole
Boys". I also have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We
parted ways in an amicable fashion.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated Dear Mr.
Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we
will keep your information in our files. These are attached as EXHIBITS.
Following is a 2-Day Transcript of Sworn Testimony that took place in the conference
room of the Lancaster County Bar Association for the purpose of settling an Allstate Insurance
Claim for vandalism and Burglary.

The transcript provides testimony related to the above

captioned case.

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 5 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 6 of 336

HAD LANCASTER COUNTY (Pennsylvania) LOST IT'S SOVEREIGNTY BEFORE IT LOST


IT'S SOUL?1
Authored in May of 1998
"Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or
strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope. And crossing each
other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a
current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression.".
by Robert F Kennedy

In 1987 This Plaintiff (Stan J. Caterbone) Had Unjustly Lost His Freedoms, His Rights,
And His Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And Justice.

The following report (most identities purposely omitted from this version) is an
amazingly true and factual account of an extraordinarily bizarre tragedy that has turned one
man's life into an eleven (11)2 year free fall into "Dante's Hell".
On the surface, this is a story of a victim (Stan J. Caterbone) struggling to seek the
truth, but in reality, the evidence will conclude that this is a victim, literally, held hostage by
virtue of his truth. Later, the preponderance of evidence that Stan Caterbone has amassed and
his obsession for meticulously documenting his ordeal might seem eccentric, yet his
demonstrated ability to react to events before they unfold appears mystical. And this was his
manner in which he tactfully defended and protected his life. It is these actions that have
painted the landscape with a dire vengeance for his ruin. His actions will ultimately serve to
protect, preserve, and foster the truth of his story, incriminating the culpability of his many
perpetrators, while at the same time being twisted and tainted in a relentless manner to attack
his credibility.
This is a story of a human being endearing for his rights, living in fear of his life, and the
remedial actions required for the truth to set him free. A victim (Stan J. Caterbone) forever
believing in his accomplishments and his visions, yet forced to adhere to a life of their
diversions. Fatefully, ten years after being taken as a "political hostage", with the aid of
numerous arrests and false imprisonment's conveniently falling short convictions, a Federal
Judge, Judge Stuart Dalzall, of the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania, opened a "Pandora's
Box" into the true colors of the inner workings and politics of ultra conservative Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania, a supposedly "God's" country. His findings reeled a dramatic and
1
2

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 6 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 7 of 336


emotional response from the Lancaster County community that was akin to the assassination of
JFK. A community where "obstructions of justice" strikes a startling and stark contrast to the
image it so desperately embraces. A community proud of it's "tough on crime" judges, a
community of "plain folks" and Amish, and a community settled in a beautiful landscape
abundant in an agricultural bounty. This is not a community of compromising integrity. Or so it
has been perceived.
Judge Dalzall's extremely controversial findings were responsible for Pennsylvania's own
crafting of the "Laurie Bill", the retaliation by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania intended to
curb the Federal Courts interference within the respective state's own jurisdictions and
proceedings. Or was it a political maneuver to close the lid on "Pandora's Box"? The
Pennsylvania Attorney General and the Lancaster County District Attorney have both thrown all
their might and all their muscle at turning the tides of Judge Dalzall's findings. This story and
Stan Caterbone's rights have been violated and abused by some of the very same principals
that were responsible for Judge Dalzall's unsettling revelations. Lancaster County prosecutors
were found to have engaged in one of the grossest acts of prosecutorial misconduct "found in
the English speaking language", which allegedly occurred in this now famous Lisa Michelle
Lambert case, a murder trial which began in the summer of 1992. Subsequently, it is now in
the midst of a treacherous appeal process convened by Judge Dalzall. And if so, by fate, in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the home of the "Freedom Fighters".
It is this public disclosure, that casts a new light and sudden hope for freedom into Stan
Caterbone's unbelievable and horrid story, that begun just four years prior to the murder of
Laurie Show. It is the decisive similarities of how both victims were subjected to a very
calculated and politically motivated attempts to "frame" and "fabricate circumstances" to obtain
the results that justified the means for illicit self-serving interests. This very same conduct,
committed by public servants, elected and enlisted to enforce the law, to which Judge Dalzell
found so appalling. Conduct, which violated the very same rights their respective offices are
commissioned to protect. Conduct, which strikes the meaning of "We The People" from our
nation's very own Constitution.
Fortunately, Stan Caterbone's story is laced with a thread of faith, a faith in God. And
because of his faith, Stan Caterbone will forever regard Lisa Michelle Lambert 3 and Laurie Show
as his little "Angels of Justice", a Godsend. An answer to his many prayers, that for the first
time in ten years provided a small glimmer of hope, and a few moments of solitude that have
materially justified his own tragic experience. The realization that the truth is that much more
believable because of the trials and tribulations of Lisa Michelle Lambert. Unfortunately, this

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 7 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 8 of 336


revelation came at the unfortunate and untimely death of Laurie. However, it just may be God's
intentions of a Higher Purpose.
This story was perpetuated through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious
wrongdoing

by

both

the

law

enforcement

community

of Lancaster

County

and

the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as community leaders. A process that continues to


obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of
political and judicial corruption. All in the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the
status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping
it's disclosure from escaping beyond the confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that
evolved from the days of this country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere
strayed away from the intent of our constitution;
with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of our
civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers
revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are!

AT ISSUE
The central issue in this story is a cover up, a cover up of mass proportions, and of
perplexing design, with national consequences. The fact of the matter is that this cover up has
had ramifications throughout this world; specifically the Middle East The cover up would be
emphatically unbelievable without the wealth of evidence, especially the recorded conversations
with Pennsylvania officials. A cover up that permeates from what will later emerge as the 4th
largest financial fraud (Billion Dollars) in the history of the United States coupled with the
covert sales of arms to Iraq. And five years after this cover up began, these same munitions
were used against our own troops in the Persian Gulf War. And of course, there are admitted
ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA).. And this
cover up and story, which began in June of 1987, in Lancaster County, preceded criminal
indictments by the United States Attorney General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Department of Justice and Commerce, and more. A
vast array of criminal activities conspired from the ultra conservative Lancaster County, where
God is supposedly supreme, and it's hard line approach to crime is said to be preeminent. In
June of 1987, Lancaster County was immersed in a dynamic twist of fate, with a host of players
which may never be fully identified.
The irony of this story is how Lancaster County manages the disclosure of the very
same criminal activities that this story proves that it condoned, prior to the intervention of
federal authorities. It most dramatically will prove the nature of it's integrity, or lack thereof.
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 8 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 9 of 336

International Signal & Control, (ISC) is the controversial player in this web of
conspiracy. In 1987, ISC was the third largest employer in Lancaster County, a non-discrete
defense contractor. In all due respect to our beloved country, this report is in no way
challenging the policies or the activities of the Department of Defense, or the vast agencies of
the "Intelligence Community", especially the CIA or the NSA (National Security Advisory). with
regards to ISC's foreign dealings. Trying to protect the world of malicious and evil empires is a
process which never ends, and whose players are constantly changing. And our respective
intelligence agencies are continually challenged with the task of trying to make a difference, in
accordance with protecting our national security. Unfortunately, given the nature of their
discrete activities, and given the CIA's history of avoiding congressional approval in certain
situations, our current laws are void of effectively dealing with the peripheral catastrophes of
such activities that inherently transpire. The CIA remains immune, while everyone outside
suffers the consequences.
The fact that the CIA, or anyone of the other intelligence community, may have been
involved, does not grant a blanket of immunity over activities which were not material to
protecting our national security. If a company provides a service to anyone in the intelligence
community, our constitution, our laws, and it's respective commercial regulatory authorities,
must still have the full sense of their jurisdiction. The intelligence community may not have the
right of intervention into the commercial enterprise, or organization, circumventing the rights of
its employees, shareholders, creditors, and customers. No United States law or statute
suggests that there is any involuntary mandate that requires any of the preceding to
compromise his or her interests in the respective enterprise for the sake of national security, or
the respective intelligence agency. There must be considerations paid to all involved for those
rights and interests that compromise such a relationship. Otherwise, the CIA could effectively
gain control of any domestic corporation it so desires, without ever owning one share of its
outstanding stock, simply by enlisting its product or services for the sake of national security.
The CIA requires a formal vehicle to enlist the aid of our domestic commercial enterprises. ISC
is a proven and unfortunate example of that.
Stan Caterbone was a shareholder of record of International Signal & Control (ISC) for
the previous four years prior to when this tragic ordeal began. Stan Caterbone was to purchase
the stock from now Republican Pennsylvania Senator Gib Armstrong, who was in the brokerage
business at the time and selling ISC stock. The stock was sold over the London Securities
Exchange, supposedly for reasons to suppress information. Stan Caterbone was interested in
the stock because of his appetite for technology, and was more curious about the business of
ISC, than anything. In fact, Stan Caterbone had never made any inference to any of the illicit

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 9 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 10 of 336


dealings with Iraq. However, the perpetrators of this story, attempt to hide behind a vale of
"national security," in an effort to find legal immunity from all wrongdoing. In accordance, the
record will prove that this is merely a smoke screen used to intimidate and obstruct Stan
Caterbone's access for due process of the law.
The trials and tribulations of Stan Caterbone are unprecedented in terms of emotional
and psychological duress, fortunately his indestructible faith in God, and his enduring belief in
himself and the truth, endures his life. There was one attempt on the his life, days within the
public disclosure of the CIA's involvement with the local Lancaster County defense contractor
(ISC), which Ted Kopel reported on ABC News Nightline, on May 23, 1991, 4 years after the
initial cover up began. This story will depict a series of systematic and strategic offensive
attacks upon Stan Caterbone and his businesses that will result failed business enterprises, and
a Hollywood motion picture, deserted. An impeccable professional reputation and a flawless
credit rating purposely sabotaged. Financial opportunities, that in 1987, were almost impossible
to extrapolate, Vast financial opportunities and aspirations forever a part of history. This
horrendous Crime was perpetrated for the interest of a cover up, further protecting the corrupt
enterprises of Lancaster County's International Signal & Control (ISC). A quest for justice that
polarized every relationship Stan Caterbone maintained, in Lancaster County and beyond,
including friends and family. This story demonstrates a methodology of his perpetrators for
keeping Stan Caterbone "quarantined" from justice and public disclosure, through a malicious
means of "credibility" proponents, and horrendously deceptive tactics. Financial motives
prominently displayed in the hands of all of the perpetrators, which absolves the burden for a
traditional conspiracy.
The emotional response to the truth of this story is compelling, to say the least.
Subsequently, the startling keen sense of perception that Stan Caterbone had demonstrated is
even more intriguing. It is this extraordinary quality that is responsible for saving his life, while
yet at the same time providing his perpetrators with an alibi and a vehicle for discrediting his
startling allegations and his story. This story embellishes a dichotomy of perception that had
Hollywood producers from his film project call his work genius, while his perpetrators from the
Lancaster County Community conveniently and maliciously labeling him as "insane" and
"emotionally disturbed."

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 10 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 11 of 336


THE LANDSCAPE
The perplexing question of Stan Caterbone's intelligence, or lack thereof, is best
analyzed as a question of perception. However it terms of the legal consequences of the
activities contained herein, they are of little if any relevancy. The fact of the matter is that the
"mental deficiencies" have very little relevancy to this story, other than serving as a means to
discredit Stan Caterbone, a vehicle to facilitate the cover up, and a blanket of immunity for all
of the perpetrators.
The heart of Stan Caterbone's legal dogma is best described as follows: If a person, is
perceived to have a "mental deficiency"; yet whose actions and decisions are always proven to
be instinctively and amazingly prudent, always abiding within the law, and in the best interest
of his affairs, what rights and protection do the laws afford him from persons abusing that
perception, in order to yield political and financial rewards, as a direct consequence of his
demise? Furthermore, how does the law protect his rights, if any and all malicious acts against
Stan Caterbone, are constantly and immediately disregarded because he is perceived to not to
be "credible"? As this story unfolds, these questions will become even more troubling and
appalling. Although Stan Caterbone could never describe the pain of his trauma, he would often
say that the closest situation that may compare is that of a woman being continuously raped,
night after night, helplessly praying for relief, struggling to free herself from her captor, all with
no avail. He would call it as being "brain f------".
Stan Caterbone, coming from the lower middle class of Lancaster City, was only 29
years old when this tragedy began. Coming from a broken home, he was the third of six boys.
While at a very young age, he would help his mother run a dry cleaning business, in an
amazing similarity like Lisa Michelle Lambert, he had also nursed his mother during bouts of
depression. While in high school, he was nursing his mother's depression, while at same time
tending to his older brothers bouts of schizophrenia. Stan Caterbone had learned to listen to
the obscenities of mental illness since he was a child. He learned to fill the shoes of his absent
father in helping his mother raise his three younger brothers.. Stan Caterbone was often called
the "little old man" because of his extraordinary maturity as a child. Stan Caterbone was
determined to break the "barrier" of the "Good Ole Boy's" club or the power elite, and had
always felt a sense of compassion for those less fortunate, and those neglected by those of
material means, the oppressed and impoverished. He had an undivided aspiration to someday
make a difference to those that could not help themselves, especially his older brother.
Through his ingenious, resourceful, and honest business approach, he was relentlessly growing
his business and their respective missions, in constant reminder of his oppression. His in depth
understanding of computer technology and his vision were his most powerful allies. Always
pushing the envelope for advanced technologies and seeking solutions for the most efficient

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 11 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 12 of 336


means of his operations.. He knew that every break was going to be few and far between, he
dedication himself to his work, and married his business affairs, always embracing his projects
with a passion.
In 1986, after serving on the Board of Directors for the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of
International Association of Financial Planners (IAFP), Stan Caterbone had made a large
contribution to increasing its membership and it's awareness among local professionals, as it's
vice president. In an effort to promote the organization, Stan Caterbone solicited a nationally
recognized and prominent financial planner from Washington, D.C., to be a headline speaker at
a dinner meeting. Ms. Alexandra Armstrong, one of the most nationally recognized financial
planners, often headlined in Money Magazine, attracted 100 industry professionals to the
Treadway Resort Inn. The attendance was unprecedented for the local IAFP chapter. The IAFP
is the authoring organization for certification as a financial planner. It was through the direct
conversations with Ms. Armstrong regarding his ideas and her experience, that inspired Stan
Caterbone to pursue his ambitions of growing his own financial firm, which he began in the
following months.
Disgruntled with the conflicts of interest and the lack of incentive for various
professionals to work together in managing one's wealth, a process which lacked efficiency, this
entrepreneur founded the firm Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG as it was often
called. The firm was to incorporate a "one-stop-shopping" strategy and incorporate financial
services, legal, accounting, tax preparation, real estate, insurance, mortgage banking, and
estate services all in one firm, all residing in one location, all taking advantage of the
synergistic approach toward managing wealth. And to provide the professionals long term
security and equity participation, all participants were encouraged to purchase stock in the
company. This was a new and innovative approach that attracted a lot of attention from
investors and clients, but also came a lot of nervous twitches from competitors, especially in
conservative Lancaster County.
Stan Caterbone began recruiting professionals from all of the other firms, with great
success. He had enlisted two partners whom he had worked with at IDS/American Express, to
carry out his mission, which he began after extensive market studies and his early version of
the company, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., His two partners had followed Stan Caterbone to an
independent broker dealer in Atlanta, named Financial Services Corporation, where Ms.
Alexandra Armstrong was associated, and encouraged Stan Caterbone to visit, during their
discussion after dinner. Within one year, by June of 1987, the firm had invested over $40
million for respective clients.
The company had developed satellite offices throughout Pennsylvania and in several
other states, through his unique design. This firm was causing the other financial services
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 12 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 13 of 336


companies and the local banks in Lancaster County a run for their money. The firm had built a
new 20,000 square foot office building just a few miles north of the city. The firm was
attracting clients, associates, and nervous attention from, well just about everybody.
Considering the capabilities, legal, real estate, insurance, financial services, accounting, FMG
was making as many enemies as it was making friends. And Stan Caterbone always believed in
the premise that it's always better to have people talking about you, regardless of the matter,
than to have no one notice you. And they were talking. Stan Caterbone was only in his late
twenties when he started this organization,. He held several positions; he was Executive Vice
President and Secretary of Financial Management Group Ltd, and President of FMG, Advisory,
Inc., which was one of the many subsidiaries parent company owned. Stan Caterbone acted as
the architect and legal administrator of the organization, in addition to building his own
financial planning clients. He filed all of the articles of incorporation in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and submitted all of the tedious and rigorous filings necessary for the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission, which were very demanding considering Stan Caterbone,
was selling stock of his company to his associates and investors. Stan Caterbone and his
associates had also attracted some very prominent Lancastrians's to invest in his venture,
coming from various professional circles, all infatuated with this extraordinary and intriguing
concept of this young victim (Stan J. Caterbone). All had seen it's potential for success and
financial reward.
Many of his friends were involved, and in Lancaster, everyone knows everybody, so it
seams.. And everyone talks, gossip is as common as jogging. This exaggerated trait of
Lancaster County, will later to come back to haunt Stan Caterbone, in a way that is most
sickening. In a way that will parallel the attitudes and sentiments in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
story.
In 1987, his business affairs were reaching a point of incredible success. In fact, most of
his family and friends, have always questioned the merits of their legitimacy. He always
conducted his affairs with the presumption that time could not afford the opportunity to
complete his agenda, while at the same time disclosing his business affairs to persons that
were not directly involved.. Accomplishing his mission was first and foremost. But in Lancaster
County, that was difficult. Lancastrians's have a notion to fear what they don't know, and will
always believe what they think they know, regardless of its merits. In Lancaster County new
ideas are shunned unless coming from their own, and their own ideas are often kept close at
bay, inhibiting progress and stymieing learning. By June of 1987, a majority of his business
affairs were conducted out of the grasp of Lancaster County, his unknown activities made
others curious, especially in Lancaster County, where the blessing of the power elite was
essential for success. But, deep down inside, he knew he could never be accepted, because he
did not descend from a family of "social grace". This fueled his aspirations for success even

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 13 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 14 of 336


further, committed to prove that intelligence was innate and learned, not a direct correlation to
material wealth or social grace.
An elder attorney, Mr. Kenellm Shirk, a very respected and prominent older Lancaster
attorney, who was part of the status quo, provided one of his most cherished testimonials to
his concept, his reputation, and his mission. Mr. Shirk had petitioned the Pennsylvania Bar
Association, after meeting with Stan Caterbone, to obtain their blessing and their knowledge of
any laws which would forbid his firm to provide a satellite office in the headquarters of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., (FMG) Mr. Shirks firm was to provide a partner, and estate services
to the clients of FMG. The Pennsylvania Bar provided a lengthy recommendation that did not
prohibit a relationship, although cautioned it to proceed with careful review. The fact that the
very young and unknown Stan Caterbone could attract an elder, conservative Lancaster County
attorney to associate with his firm was an encouraging sign of respect. Ironically, Mr. Shirk is
the father of Roy Shirk Jr., Lisa Michelle Lambert's first attorney who represented her during
trial of 1992, the proceeding which was the center of Judge Dalzall's controversial and appalling
findings. Stan Caterbone prided himself on his entrepreneurship, and after building the
foundation for FMG, he set out to take advantage of its resources and it's synergism.
By June of 1987, Stan Caterbone had developed a fairly substantial mortgage banking
relationship with a Houston, Texas banker. That operation was capable of providing lending to
potential developers and businesses in the range of $ 3 million to $100 million. And the lending
packages were as competitive if not more competitive than the local lending institutions of
Lancaster County, capable with even higher lending limits. In a matter of months of securing
this relationship, Stan Caterbone and his partner were evaluating deals from Pennsylvania, New
Jersey, New York, Florida, and as far away as California.
There was a uniqueness to his capabilities that was very appealing to potential
borrowers. Because of the vast array of services of FMG, potential developers had the
opportunity to obtain both debt and equity financing through his companies. In plain terms,
most shopping centers raised capital by raising funds through investors coupled with a
mortgage. This gave potential developers one place to "take down the deal" rather than dealing
with many other professionals at the same time. It was a much more efficient process for all.
Stan Caterbone was capable of providing a mortgage, while at the same time selling shares in a
shopping center through it's vast client base of investors at FMG. This also gave Stan
Caterbone a formidable presence into the venture capital markets, by way of his strong ability
to raise capital through his vast portfolio of clients of FMG. And this was a rarity that
developers and investors loved. Investors were attracted because they could invest in equity
type real estate projects with real sense of knowing the developer, or "kicking the bricks" of the
project. This was far different than investing in a nationally syndicated project, with properties

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 14 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 15 of 336


scattered all over the country, and with developers that they did not know. The synergistic
approach to his organization began paying dividends by developing other peripheral markets
and businesses.
Given the complex nature of Stan Caterbone's design of FMG, internal struggles within
the organization readily became the challenge. Orchestrating the relationships among all of the
different professionals, and trying to adhere to the interests of the clients, the professionals
and of the firm, FMG, managing the daily activities required immense thought and prudence on
the part of the principals. Of, course, Stan Caterbone assumed honesty and integrity to be a
given. And for most it was. However there were times when the senior partner engaged in
tactical rights of power.
In the later part of 1986, after Stan Caterbone had developed FMG to the point where
it's future was on stable grounds, his two partners conveniently attempted to circumvent his
position and regain control of his stock and the firm. In fact, after Stan Caterbone refused to
collaborate on a scheme to "set up" his other partner, the remaining two partners began to
attempt to regain Stan Caterbone's control. Through intimidating techniques, the partners
began to attack his presence. Stan Caterbone became agitated, especially because he played
the lead role and was responsible for the formation of the company, methodically designing and
developing its foundation, with great success. And now after the company was beyond it's point
of greatest risk, due to in large part Stan Caterbone's efforts, the other two partners wanted to
take advantage of his work, and "take the cream of the pie" for their own financial gain. It was
a difficult task to carry out because Stan Caterbone was the most respected of all three
partners, consistently keeping their respective policies in the best interest of the firm and of the
other associates and stockholders. In fact, most feared that the loss of control of Stan
Caterbone would ultimately lead to adverse consequences. However the two partners trued
unsuccessfully to weaken his position, and when that didn't work, they focused on weakening
Stan Caterbone, via intimidation and humiliation The coup and hostile environment caused a
state of depression for Stan Caterbone, although he kept to his daily duties and responsibilities,
accordingly, he called a client and friend who was a psychiatrist, whom he trusted and
respected. It was easy access to a professional, yet on a very informal basis. Because Stan
Caterbone had a family history of "mental deficiencies", he wanted to seek the proper help.
The psychiatrist had diagnosed Stan Caterbone as having Bi Polar Mood disorder. The
psychiatrist had quickly discounted any correlation between the current state of affairs, and his
partner's abuse. The psychiatrist rationale was that "because the startup of the company was
so successful in such a short period of time" , and his demonstrated intelligence and creativity,
Stan Caterbone must have been in a state of mania, and of course now, was subsiding in a
state of depression, the typical cycle for manic depressants. Stan Caterbone complied with the

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 15 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 16 of 336


psychiatrist. And after refusing to sell out to his partners, vowed to regain his business and
rescind any efforts to give up his claim to his accomplishments. The depression soon faded.
Stan Caterbone never disclosed the fact that he had sought help to anyone other than family
members. This coup lead to Stan Caterbone's aggressive approach to grow the business, and to
posture himself in projects that would ultimately remain in his control, out of the influence of
his partners. Particularly of most interest was saving the mortgage banking activities and the
digital movie, which he did successfully, but apparently too successfully.
THE "DIGITAL MOVIE"
Through an act of fate, in February of 1987, Stan Caterbone found himself in a meeting
with Tony Bongiovi at Power Station studios. Through one of his partners, he reluctantly
traveled to New York to consider financing a motion picture. Stan Caterbone's own lack
tolerance for the risk associated with film investments was overshadowed by the opportunity to
visit a recording studio. Although his associate was a friend of Tony's, he was not familiar with
his accomplishments, or his work, so he thought. If nothing else, it was a weekend away from
Lancaster, and a chance to visit the Big Apple. Intriguingly, he found more than he had ever
imagined on that weekend excursion. Tony Bongiovi, a musical genius, who's credits include
one of the most recognized recording studios in the country, Power Station Studios. Tony
Bongiov produced the sound track for "Star Wars", and is responsible for the format of one of
the most successful recording artist of the 80's, Jon "Bon Jovi", his cousin. Power Station has
recorded the albums for some of the most influential artists of all time, including Diana Ross,
Madonna, The Rolling Stones, Steve Winwood, Bruce Springsteen, etc., Tony, an eccentric
genius, of Italian decent, had many talents, from music to aerospace engineering. Stan
Caterbone's associate's sister met Tony while he flew his plane into Lancaster's airport for
repairs. They dated for some time and Stan Caterbone's associate and Tony became friends,
which led Stan Caterbone to Tony's Power Station Studios.
Tony was looking to finance his new project, which was to be the first digital movie.
And, given Stan Caterbone's extreme appetite for technologies, coupled with his amazing sense
of perception, he dramatically recognized the future evolution for the technical merits of
delivering digital video and digital audio entertainment to the mass markets. By June of 1987,
Stan Caterbone was positioned as the Executive Producer, collaborating with Flatbush Films of
Hollywood California, the movie producers, entrusted with the mission of finding investors to
provide funding for the "first digital movie", and to manage the ensuing business elements it
required.
The movie was to be shot "on-location" at the Jersey shore points, mostly in Wildwood. Tony
strategically envisioned making a movie in the horror genre. There were several specific
reasons that supported this strategy. First, he determined that it was the least expensive
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 16 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 17 of 336


format to produce, we all estimated a budget of $4 million for the production and post
production. Secondly, the horror genre would compliment a very intense sound track. The
sound track was important to enhance the new digital format, and also provide the means to
introduce a new band that he had been grooming in his studio for the past several years,
"French Lick", his predecessor to "Bon Jovi". There had been bad blood between Tony and his
cousin "Bon Jovi", which resulted in legal disputes pertaining to Tony's financial interests in
Jon's success. It was an unfortunate situation considering Tony's father and Jon's father were
brothers living in the same area. It was a subject that Tony never wanted to discuss, except for
his contributions toward Jon's career.
If by another act of fate, Stan Caterbone had the privilege of meeting one of the many
superstars while working at Power Station studios. While growing up, at an early age, Stan
Caterbone would sneak up into the bedroom of his oldest brother, and start up his old General
Electric stereo phonograph and listen to his favorite album - Diana Ross and the Supremes. It
was a passion and a ritual that provided an early infatuation to music, and to Diana Ross. Stan
Caterbone was only 10 or 11 years old. And at this early age, he noticed and listened to the
annoying hiss, that conventional hiss that always seemed to overshadow the music, whether
played on an album, on the radio, 8-track tape, or cassette.
And in a mystical twist of fate, while engrossed in a project dedicated to delivering
music without that hiss (digital) - Stan Caterbone opened the door to the recording suite to
pack his bags for the journey back to Lancaster; - and there she sat, with a glowing array of
beauty, more beautiful than any picture could ever tell, Ms. Diana Ross. She was pregnant and
in the middle of a recording session, for a new album. Her assistant quickly demanded, in a
stern and protective voice, that we leave, and Stan Caterbone and his associate replied "this is
our makeshift bedroom, we are just gathering our belongings". Stan Caterbone walked toward
Diana Ross, who was seated near his bag, and she asked "and who are you?", Stan Caterbone
calmly replied his name and absorbed as much of her beauty as his eyes could behold before
walking out the door. The room that was his bedroom the nigh before, and suddenly transfixed
into the recording suite of Diana Ross, thinking back some twenty years earlier, one of the
many gifts that God would bestow upon him. A living memorial and reminder to his older
brother, who died on Christmas day of 1985, his best friend who taught him two of his greater
pleasures in life, Diana Ross, and listening to music. He prayed that his brother was watching
from above.
And so, the digital movie project that Stan Caterbone had embraced in 1987 had
personal significance, and he never ever doubted his instincts regarding the technical merits of
the project. Stan Caterbone's perception that the entertainment industry would deliver full
length motion pictures in a truly digital medium will later become a truly remarkable vision.

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 17 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 18 of 336

The technical merits of this project and at this particular time with respect to Stan
Caterbone's extreme sense of perception require analysis. To truly understand this time
perception, some of the attributes of digital technologies need to be fully understood. In 1987,
Compact DISC (CD) technology was only now being introduced to the commercial markets.
Stan Caterbone's own crafting of his joint venture proposals, dominated by the term "digital
movie", is in itself some 4 or 5 years away. In 1987, there was very little use of the term
"digital", with the exception of research and development engineers. Stan Caterbone will,
throughout the documentation of this story, will have preceded a terminology that has literally
become the root of most technological advancements in the computer and telecommunications
industries of our present day, 10 years after Stan Caterbone's vision. Today, "digital" is found
to be part of or referred to in just about every product available in the commercial markets.
During May of 1987, Stan Caterbone had created a joint venture proposal for SONY
Entertainment, Inc., for the digital movie. After weeks of researching the current state-ofaffairs within SONY, and after his proposal was completed, SONY publicly announced their
desire to open the markets for new and emerging technologies on the cover of TIME magazine,
another demonstrated sense of perception. It was this proposal, when delivered to one of the
Hollywood producers in Santa Monica, California, after reading a draft of the proposal she said
"you are a genius". The proposal was introduced to Tony Bongiovi at the Wildwood Boardwalk,
where many of scenes were to be shot, and he approved of the proposal and thought that it
had great merits. Tony, who wanted very to do with the business elements of his project, gave
Stan Caterbone complete authority to secure the financing of the project, with a salary as
Executive Producer, and a percentage of the profits on the back end.
After review of Stan Caterbone's research and proposal's, his vision and his passion,
unfortunately without his efforts, has come to be known as Direct Satellite System, or DSS,
which is Sony's satellite entertainment system (TV), delivering digital audio and digital video
entertainment. That technology is fast eroding at the cable industry. Stan Caterbone had his
patent research center around the PSDMS system, the Power Station Digital Movie System. And
that was in 1987, some seven years before SONY delivered his dreams. Later Stan Caterbone
would also accurately predict that the 90's would become the "Information Age" because of the
direct contributions and advancements of "digital technologies", which is directly responsible for
the development of the "INTERNET".
Stan Caterbone's obsession with his "digital movie" has proven to be one of his most
remarkable demonstrations of his keen sense of perception.

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 18 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 19 of 336


The author admitted in an affidavit in 1998 that he did not know the criminal culpability
of Lisa Michelle Lambert, and further argues that it was because of the prosecutorial
misconduct and the erroneous handling of the crime scene that the truth evaded both the
prosecution and the defense as to who actually killed Laurie Show.

July 12, 2016

_/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court
of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case
No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 19 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 20 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
CASE INFORMATION

Page 1 of 13

Cross Court Docket Nos: 1166 EDA 2016


Judge Assigned: Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Date Filed: 11/23/2015

OTN: T 709032-2

Originating Docket No: MJ-38120-CR-0000381-2015

LOTN:

Initiation Date: 10/01/2015

Initial Issuing Authority: Cathleen Kelly Rebar

Final Issuing Authority: Cathleen Kelly Rebar

Arresting Agency: Montgomery County Detective

Arresting Officer: Bradbury, Paul M.

Complaint/Incident #: 1
Case Local Number Type(s)

Case Local Number(s)

RELATED CASES
Related Docket No

Related Case Caption

Related Court

Association Reason

Related
CP-46-MD-0002457-2015

Comm v Kane, Kathleen Granahan

CP-38-46-Crim

Case Transferred to Criminal


Case CR 8423-2015

STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:

CPCMS 9082

Closed

Status Date
04/20/2016

Processing Status

11/27/2015

Awaiting Formal Arraignment

11/27/2015

Awaiting Filing of Information

11/23/2015

Awaiting Formal Arraignment

11/23/2015

Awaiting Filing of Information

11/19/2015

Awaiting Pre-Trial Conference

Arrest Date:

10/01/2015

Complaint Date:

10/01/2015

Awaiting Appellate Court Decision

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
20 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 21 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane

Page 2 of 13

CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type

Schedule
Start Date

Start
Time

Room

Judge Name

Schedule
Status

Formal Arraignment

01/06/2016

9:30 am

Video Room #1

Judge William T. Nicholas

Scheduled

Miscellaneous
Hearing

01/29/2016

1:00 pm

Scheduled

Miscellaneous
Hearing

02/05/2016

1:00 pm

Scheduled

Miscellaneous
Hearing

03/22/2016

1:00 pm

Scheduled

Miscellaneous
Hearing

04/20/2016

9:00 am

Scheduled

Miscellaneous
Hearing

07/26/2016

10:00 am

Scheduled

Jury Trial

08/08/2016

9:00 am

Scheduled

Jury Trial

08/09/2016

9:00 am

Scheduled

Jury Trial

08/10/2016

9:00 am

Scheduled

Jury Trial

08/11/2016

9:00 am

Scheduled

Jury Trial

08/12/2016

9:00 am

Scheduled

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:

06/14/1966

City/State/Zip: Clarks Summit, PA 18411

CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type

Name

Defendant

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

BAIL INFORMATION
Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Bail Action

Nebbia Status: None

Date

Bail Type

Percentage

Amount
Bail Posting Status

Set

10/01/2015

Unsecured

Posting Date

$10,000.00
10/01/2015

Posted

CHARGES
Seq.

Orig Seq.

Grade

Statute

Statute Description

Offense Dt.

OTN

F3

18 4902 A

Perjury

03/16/2014

T 709032-2

M2

18 4903 A1

False Swearing - Offic Proceed

03/16/2014

T 709032-2

M2

18 5101

Obstruct Admin Law/Other Govt Func

03/16/2014

T 709032-2

DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
CPCMS 9082

Disposition Date

Final Disposition
Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
21 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 22 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description

Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date

Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Page 3 of 13

Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Credit For Time Served
Start Date

Incarceration/Diversionary Period

Sentence Conditions
Held for Court (Lower Court)

Defendant Was Present

Lower Court Disposition

11/10/2015

Not Final

1 / Perjury

Held for Court (Lower Court)

F3

18 4902 A

2 / False Swearing - Offic Proceed

Held for Court (Lower Court)

M2

18 4903 A1

3 / Obstruct Admin Law/Other Govt Func

Held for Court (Lower Court)

M2

18 5101

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
22 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 23 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case

COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
Name:

Thomas W. McGoldrick

Name:

District Attorney
078192

Supreme Court No:

Supreme Court No:


Phone Number(s):
610-278-3126
610-278-3090
610-278-3095
Address:

Page 4 of 13

Ross M. Kramer
Private

Rep. Status:
(Phone)
(Other)
(Other)

Montgomery CO Da's Office


PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Name:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ATTORNEY INFORMATION

Active

Phone Number(s):
Address:
Winston And Strawn LLP
200 Park Ave
New York, NY 10166

Risa Vetri Ferman


District Attorney
065228

Supreme Court No:


Phone Number(s):
610-278-3100
610-278-3099
610-292-4950
610-278-3090
610-278-3099
Address:

(Phone)
(Phone)
(Fax)
(Other)
(Other)

Montgomery Cty Da's Office


PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Name:

Kevin R. Steele

Assistant District Attorney


066335
Supreme Court No:
Phone Number(s):
610-278-3098
610-278-3095
610-278-3126
Address:

(Phone)
(Other)
(Other)

Montgomery CO Da's Office


PO Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Name:

Michelle Ann Henry


Assistant District Attorney
074839

Supreme Court No:


Phone Number(s):
215-348-6344
CPCMS 9082

(Phone)
Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
23 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 24 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane

Page 5 of 13

Address:
Bucks CO Da's Office
55 E Court St
Doylestown, PA 18901-4318

ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

10/01/2015

Document Date

Filed By
Rebar, Cathleen Kelly

Bail Set - Kane, Kathleen Granahan


2

10/01/2015

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Bail Posted - Kane, Kathleen Granahan


1/1

11/19/2015

Kramer, Ross M.

Entry of Appearance/Arraignment Waived


2/1

11/23/2015

Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County

Original Papers Received from Lower Court


2

11/23/2015

MDJ-38-1-20

Formal Arraignment Scheduled 01/06/2016 9:30AM


Jan 6, 2016, service on 11/10/15
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Hand Delivered

11/10/2015
3/1

11/24/2015

MDJ-38-1-20

Notes of Testimony
Preliminary Hearing, Ctrm B
Tuesday November 10, 2015. 1:00 pm
Judge Rebar
4/1

11/27/2015

MDJ-38-1-20

Original Papers Received from Lower Court


5/1

12/02/2015

MDJ-38-1-20

Amended Docket Transcript 12/2/15


6/2

12/21/2015

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Scheduling Case Management Conference


1/29/16 at 1:00,
Pennsylvania
Kramer, Ross M.
CPCMS 9082

1st

Floor

Chambers

of

the

undersigned,

Montgomery

County

Courthouse,

Norristown,

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
24 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 25 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

Service To

Document Date

Page 6 of 13

Filed By

Service By

Issue Date

Service Type

12/21/2015

First Class

Status Date

Service Status

McGoldrick, Thomas W.
12/21/2015
7/1

Interoffice
01/29/2016

McGoldrick, Thomas W.

Information Filed
8/1

02/02/2016

02/01/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

02/01/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Scheduling Pre-Trial Conference


February 5, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom "B"
8a/2

02/02/2016

Scheduling Order
Deadline for Informal Discovery - 02/29/16
Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions - 03/04/16
Deadline for Answers/Replies to Pre-Trial Motions - 03/11/16
Deadline for Briefs - 03/18/16
8b/3

02/02/2016

02/01/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

02/01/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Scheduling Pre-Trial Motions Hearing


March 22, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom "B"
8c/4

02/02/2016

Order Scheduling Trial


August 8, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom "B"
9/1

02/09/2016

Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County

Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Conference, Ctrm B
Friday February 5, 2016. 1:35 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
25 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 26 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

10/1

02/17/2016

Document Date

Page 7 of 13

Filed By
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to Motion to Quash Subpoena Direccted to Michael A. Schwartz, Counsel to


Reporter Christopher Brennan and Philadelphia Media Network, PBC
Filed by Thomas W. McGoldrick, DDA
11/2

02/17/2016

Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County

Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Conference Errata Sheet, Ctrm B
Friday February 5, 2016. 1:35 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
12/1

02/26/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Memorandum of Law in Support of its Response to Motion to Quash Subpoena Directed to


Michael A. Schwartz, Counsel to Reporter Christopher Brennan and Philadelphia Media Network, PBC
Filed by M. Stewart Ryan, ADA
13/1

03/04/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

03/04/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

Memorandum of Law
14/2
Omnibus Pre-Trial Motion
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
15/3

03/04/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Omnibus Pretrial Motions
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
16/4

03/04/2016

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Motion for Pretrial Discovery and Inspection


Filed by Thomas W. McGoldrick, DDA
17/1

03/11/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Answer to the Commonwealth's Motion for Pretrial Discovey and
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
26 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 27 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

18/2

03/11/2016

Document Date

Page 8 of 13

Filed By
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to Defendant's Omnibus Pretrial Motion


CR 6239-15
8423-15
Filed by Kevin R. Steele, DA
19/1

03/16/2016

03/16/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Decorum Order Governing Pre-Trial Motions Hearing


Henry, Michelle Ann
First Class
03/16/2016
Kramer, Ross M.
03/16/2016

First Class

McGoldrick, Thomas W.
03/16/2016

Interoffice

Steele, Kevin R.
03/16/2016

Interoffice

20/1

03/18/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Supplemental Pretrial Motions of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane


Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
21/2

03/18/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Omnibus Pretrial Motions
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
22/3

03/18/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Affidavit of Ross M. Kramer


Filed by Ross M. Kramer, Esq.
23/2

03/23/2016

03/22/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Scheduling Pre-Trial Motion Hearing


April 20, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom "B"
Kramer, Ross M.
03/22/2016

First Class

McGoldrick, Thomas W.
03/22/2016

Interoffice

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
27 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 28 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
Service To
Issue Date
24/3

Document Date

CP Filed Date

Page 9 of 13

Filed By

Service By
Service Type
03/23/2016

Status Date

Service Status

03/22/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Granting Motion for Pre-Trial Discovery and Inspection


Deft to Prepare Report of Examination or Tests by Any Expert Witness Defense Plans to Call to Testify
Deft Must Also Observe Continuing Duty to Disclose All Notices Within the Scope of Discovery
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
Interoffice
03/22/2016
Minora, Amil Michael
03/22/2016

First Class

25/1

03/25/2016

Gurney, Kaitlin M.

Motion of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, Alm Media, Block Communications, and
PA Media Group to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records and Proceedings
26/1

03/29/2016

03/28/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Omnibus Pre-Trial Motions Order


1. A Decision on Point 3 is Deferred Until After Argument on Point 2 of the Supplemental Pre-Trial Motions of AG
2. The Relief Requested by Deft in the Remaining Points is Denied
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
03/28/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
03/28/2016

Interoffice

27/1

03/30/2016

Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County

Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Motions, Ctrm B
Tuesday March 22, 2016. 1:40 pm
Judge Demchick-Alloy
28/1

04/06/2016

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to Defendant's Omniubs Pretrial Motion


Filed by Kevin R. Steele, District Attorney

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
28 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 29 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

29/1

04/08/2016

Document Date

Page 10 of 13

Filed By
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to the Motion of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, ALM Media, Block
Communications, and PA Media Group to Intervene for the Limitd Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial
Records and Proceedings
Filed by M. Stewart Ryan, ADA
30/1

04/12/2016

04/12/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Motion Of Philadelphia Media Network Order


1. Moving Parties Granted Leave to Intervene for the Purpose of Seeking
Proceedings
2. Intervenors are Granted Leave to File, on or before 04/15/16, their Proposed
to Permission to File Under Seal, Attached Exhibit A
3. AG Kane and the Commonwealth are Granted Leave to File, on or before
Interveneor's Response in Opposition to Motion to Permission to File Motion Under Seal
4. The Intervenors are Granted Leave to Participate in Oral Argument on Point
Motions of AG
Kane at the Hearing on 04/20/16
Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
04/12/2016

Access to Judicial Records and


Response in Opposition to Motion
04/15/16, a Sur-Response to the
Two of the Supplemental PreTrial

McGoldrick, Thomas W.
04/12/2016
31/1

Interoffice
04/13/2016

04/12/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Decorum Order Governing The Pre-Trial Motions Hearing


Kramer, Ross M.
First Class
04/13/2016
McGoldrick, Thomas W.
04/13/2016

Interoffice

32/1

04/14/2016

04/13/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Amended Scheduling Order


Time Change ONLY for the 04/20/16 Pre-Trial Motions Hearing: Changed to 10:00 a.m.
Kramer, Ross M.
04/25/2016

First Class

McGoldrick, Thomas W.
04/25/2016

Interoffice

33/1

04/15/2016

Gurney, Kaitlin M.

Response of Philadelphia Media Network, The Morning Call, Alm Media, Block Communications, and
PA Media Group in Opposition to Attorney General Kathleen Kane's Motion for Permission to File Motion Under
Seal
CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
29 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 30 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES

Page 11 of 13

Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

34/1

04/20/2016

04/20/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

04/20/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

Notice of Appeal to the Superior Court


34a/2

04/20/2016

Certificate of Service
35/1

04/25/2016

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to Defendant's Notice of Appeal


Filed by Kevin R. Steele, District Attorney
36/1

04/27/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Motion of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
FIled by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
37/1

04/29/2016

Court of Common Pleas Montgomery County

Notes of Testimony
Pretrial Motions, Ctrm B
Wednesday April 20, 2016. 10:04 am
Judge Demchick-Alloy
38/1

05/02/2016

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to Defendant's Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution


Filed by Kevin R. Steele, District Attorney
39/1

05/09/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Motion to Quash Based on
Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
Filed by Amil M. Minora, Esq.
40/1

05/13/2016

05/12/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

05/16/2016

05/16/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Opinion
1

Order Striking Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution


Deft Granted 10 Days to File an Amended Motion - with a Support Brief within 10 Days if Commonwealth Files a
Response
Commonwealth is Ordered to File a Response (if Defense Files Amended Motion) within 10 Days
CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
30 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 31 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
Service To
Issue Date

Document Date

CP Filed Date

Page 12 of 13

Filed By

Service By
Service Type

Kramer, Ross M.
05/16/2016

First Class

McGoldrick, Thomas W.
05/16/2016

Interoffice

05/17/2016

Status Date

Service Status

Weiss, Ann Thornburg

List of Documents sent to Superior Court, DA and Attorney


2

05/17/2016

Weiss, Ann Thornburg

Certificate and Transmittal of Record to Appellate Court


1

05/26/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

Motion of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane to Quash Based on Selevtive and Vindictive Prosecution
2

05/26/2016

Kramer, Ross M.

Memorandum of law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen Kane's Motion to Quash


Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
1

06/06/2016

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Response to Defendant's Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution


Filed by Kevin R. Steele, DA
1

06/13/2016

Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane's Motion to Quash Based on
Selective and Vindictive Prosecution
Filed by Gerald L. Shargel, Esq.
1

06/20/2016

06/20/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Denying Motion to Quash Based on Selective and Vindictive Prosecution


McGoldrick, Thomas W.
Interoffice
06/20/2016
Minora, Amil Michael
06/20/2016

CPCMS 9082

First Class

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
31 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 32 of 336

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-46-CR-0008423-2015

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
ENTRIES

Page 13 of 13

Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

06/30/2016

06/28/2016

Demchick-Alloy, Wendy

Order Scheduling Trial Management Conference


July 11, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. 1st Floor Chambers
1

07/11/2016

Rosenblum, Douglas Keith

Entry of Appearance

CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Last Payment Date:
Kane, Kathleen Granahan

Total of Last Payment:


Assessment

Payments

Adjustments

Non Monetary
Payments

Total

$9.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$9.00

Costs/Fees Totals:

$9.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$9.00

Grand Totals:

$9.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$9.00

Defendant
Costs/Fees

Copies (Montgomery)

** - Indicates assessment is subrogated

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 07/12/2016

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania
State
Police. Moreover
employer
does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal
History Record
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Amicus for
Kathleen
Kane an
Page
32 who
of 336
Tuesday
July 12,
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page33
1 of 336
87

CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 Amicus for Kathleen Kane Page 33 of 336

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page34
2 of 336
87
Exhibit To Preliminary Emergency Injunction for Emergency Relief, July 12, 2016

EXHIBITS

16-05815 EXHIBIT AllstateAmicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page34
2 of 336
87

Tuesday July 12, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page35
3 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

EXAMI NATI ON UNDER OATH OF


STANLEY J . CATERBONE
( VOLUME I I )

2
3
4
5
6
7

TAKEN BY:

ALLSTATE I NSURANCE COMPANY

BEFORE:

DI ANE A. SMI TH, REPORTER


NOTARY PUBLI C

DATE:

J UNE 28, 2016, 9: 25 A. M.

PLACE:

LANCASTER BAR ASSOCI ATI ON


28 EAST ORANGE STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANI A

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGI N
BY:
CHRI STOPHER M. REESER, ESQUI RE

16
FOR - ALLSTATE I NSURANCE COMPANY
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page35
1
3 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page36
4 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

1
2
3
4

WI TNESSES
NAME

EXAMI NATI ON

STANLEY J . CATERBONE
BY:

MR. REESER

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page36
2
4 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page37
5 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

1
2

STANLEY J . CATERBONE, c al l ed as a wi t nes s , bei ng


dul y s wor n, t es t i f i ed as f ol l ows :

EXAMI NATI ON

4
5

THE WI TNESS:

I want ed t o t r y t o gi v e y ou s ome

bac k gr ound about why peopl e ar e doi ng t hi s t o me.

MR. REESER:

THE WI TNESS:

Ok ay .
Her e' s one of t he f i r s t t hi ngs .

Thi s i s a book wr i t t en by t he Chi ef of Pol i c e ex - wi f e.

BY MR. REESER:

10

Chi ef of Pol i c e of Lanc as t er ?

11

Lanc as t er , y es .

She ac c us ed hi m of domes t i c

12

abus e, and I ' v e had t he book f or ov er a y ear .

13

ot her t hi ng i s t hi s book her e.

14

r i ght now t o get her out of pr i s on.

And t he

I hav e t he onl y l i v e c as e

15

And why don' t y ou r ead t he t i t l e of t he book .

16

Lov e, Mur der and Cor r upt i on i n Lanc as t er Count y ,

17

My St or y by Li s a Mi c hel l e Lamber t and Dav i d Br own.

18

c ommuni c at e wi t h Dav e Br own a c oupl e t i mes a week .

19

Who i s Dav i d Br own?

20

Her at t or ney t hat wr ot e t he book .

Now i f y ou' r e

21

not f ami l i ar wi t h t hi s c as e, t her e wer e t hr ee t eenager s

22

t hat wer e i nv ol v ed i n a mur der bac k i n 1992.

23

f eder al j udge named St ewar t Dal z el l r el eas ed her s ay i ng

24

t her e was s o muc h pr os ec ut or i al mi s c onduc t i n t he c as e t hat

25

s he was ac t ual l y i nnoc ent .

I n 1997, a

Now Penns y l v ani a appeal ed i t ,

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page37
3
5 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page38
6 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

and t hey had t o hav e anot her PCRA hear i ng i n f r ont of Lar r y

St engel .

es s ent i al l y , and s he went bac k t o pr i s on.

Wel l , he f ound - - he r ev er s ed ev er y t hi ng

Now l as t J une, I f i l ed an Ami c us on her behal f as

t o mov e i t i n t he c as e.

appeal c as e t o get her out of pr i s on.

c ont r ov er s i al t hat 38, 000 peopl e s i gned a pet i t i on f r om

Lanc as t er t o i mpeac h t he j udge.

They nev er i mpeac hed hi m.

And I c ur r ent l y hav e a 3r d Ci r c ui t


Now t he c as e was s o

Of c our s e, t hey l os t .

But i n 1997, t he at t or ney t hat

10

r epr es ent ed her had s ome deal i ngs wi t h me.

11

Chr i s t i na Rai nv i l l e.

12

Her name i s

Now es s ent i al l y my Ami c us i s bas ed on a pr emi s e

13

t hat I s uf f er ed t he s ame pr os ec ut or i al mi s c onduc t t hat s he

14

s uf f er ed.

15

f eder al whi s t l ebl ower f or I nt er nat i onal Si gnal Cont r ol , t he

16

f i r m s el l i ng ar ms t o I r aq t o a Bl ac k Ops Pr ogr am wi t h t he

17

CI A and t he NSA - - I bl ew t he whi s t l e i n ' 87 - - t hey wer e

18

i ndi c t ed i n ' 91 - - and t he f ac t t hat I ' m a v i c t i m of mi nd

19

c ont r ol , t her e' s ampl e r eas on and s uf f i c i ent ev i denc e of

20

why peopl e br eak i nt o my hous e and s t eal my t hi ngs and

21

br eak my t hi ngs .

Now y ou c oupl e t hat wi t h t he f ac t t hat I ' m t he

22

Now I pr es ent ed t r ans c r i pt s f r om Ni c k Begi c h, who

23

i s a r enowned ex per t i n mi nd c ont r ol , Kar en St ewar t , who i s

24

a f or mer NSA whi s t l ebl ower who s uf f er s t he s ame

25

s y mpt omat ol ogy as me, and J ul i anne Mc Ki nney , who i s a

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page38
4
6 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page39
7 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

f or mer i nt el l i genc e of f i c er of t he U. S. Ar my .

s uf f er t he s ame s y mpt oms t hat I do.

Sec ur i t y has been pay i ng me di s abi l i t y benef i t s s i nc e 2008

f or mi nd c ont r ol .

5
6

They al l

I n addi t i on, Soc i al

Do y ou hav e a c opy of t he Di s abi l i t y

Det er mi nat i on?

Sur e, I hav e i t i n her e.

Can I t ak e a l ook at i t ?

Yeah, i t mi ght t ak e me a c oupl e mi nut es t o f i nd

11

Sur e.

12

Thi s i nj unc t i on was f i l ed y es t er day at 4: 24 p. m.

10

it.

13

i n t he Lanc as t er Count y Cour t hous e.

14

doc ument at i on wi t h SSA.

15

Now t hr ough t he appl i c at i on pr oc es s , I appl i ed i n Apr i l of

16

' 09 and r ec ei v ed a c hec k f or $21, 000 i n Augus t .

17

s e.

I hav e 191 pages of

Her e i s my l et t er , awar d l et t er .

I was pr o

Ther e wer e not ps y c hi at r i c ex ami nat i ons .

18

May I t ak e a l ook at t hat as y ou' r e t al k i ng?

19

Yes .

And t her e wer e no medi c al r epor t s .

I t was

20

al l awar ded on my doc ument at i on of mi nd c ont r ol s y mpt oms

21

and i l l nes s es .

22

' 09.

23

bac k one y ear , r et r oac t i v e one y ear .

24

one y ear .

25

' 05, whi c h i s when I dec l ar ed t hat I bec ame f ul l - t i me

What t hey di d was - - I appl i ed i n Apr i l of

They awar ded me benef i t s i n Augus t of ' 09 and pai d me


They c an onl y do i t

But t hey dec l ar ed me di s abl ed i n Dec ember of

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page39
5
7 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page40
8 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

t el epat hi c and under har as s ment wi t h el ec t r omagnet i c

weapons .

3
4

That ' s what t he ' 05 dat e i s .


So I s ee, y ou k now, t he l et t er s ay i ng t hat y ou

bec ame di s abl ed under our r ul es on Dec ember 1, 2005.

Ri ght .

I t does n' t s ay any t hi ng as t o why .

No, t hey don' t do t hat .

They onl y - - what t hey do

i s t hey gi v e y ou an awar d l et t er and i t ei t her s ay s

phy s i c al or ment al , not hi ng bey ond t hat bec aus e of HI PAA.

10

But i f y ou go t hr ough al l t he doc ument at i on I hav e of t he

11

ent i r e pr oc es s , y ou' l l not i c e t hat t her e' s no medi c al

12

r epor t s s ubmi t t ed.

13

J oe Pi t t s '

14

ps y c hi at r i c ev al uat i on bec aus e I t hought i t was r equi r ed.

15

They woul dn' t gi v e me one.

16

f or ment al i l l nes s , i mpos s i bl e.

17

And I begged t hem - - i n f ac t , I went t o

of f i c e t o t r y t o get t hem t o gi v e me a

So i t ' s i mpos s i bl e f or i t t o be
I t ' s j us t not .

You don' t hav e a doc ument any wher e f r om t he Soc i al

18

Sec ur i t y Admi ni s t r at i on t hat s ay s we' v e det er mi ned t hat

19

y ou' r e di s abl ed bec aus e of t hi s c ondi t i on?

20
21
22

A
phy s i c al .
Q

They don' t do t hat .

I t ' s ei t her ment al or

I f I had one, I ' d pr es ent i t .


Yeah.

I t s eems t o me I ' v e s een t hi ngs t o t he

23

c ont r ar y wher e t her e' s been a det er mi nat i on t hat s omebody

24

i s di s abl ed - -

25

Wel l , t hey di dn' t gi v e me any .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page40
6
8 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page41
9 of 336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

- - f or a par t i c ul ar r eas on.

Now my f at her c ol l ec t ed di s abi l i t y .

He was a

v i c t i m of MKUl t r a.

What i s t hat ?

That ' s wher e mi nd c ont r ol c ame f r om, a CI A

pr ogr am.

I t s t ar t ed i n t he ' 50s .

Ok ay .

You' l l hav e t o as k t hem.

I mean I under s t and what y ou' r e t el l i ng me about

10
11

Why was he a t ar get ?

y our r ol e as a f eder al whi s t l ebl ower but - A

He was Nav y , a v er y i nt el l i gent per s on.

He was a

12

member of t he Ai r Gunner s Squadr on, whi c h I hav e

13

doc ument at i on f r om hi m t hat he l ef t , whi c h i s l i k e a

14

s pec i al opt i on.

15

s c hool .

16

And he gr aduat ed wi t h honor s f r om t hei r

So t hat c oul d be why .


What I ' d l i k e t o do i s go bac k t o what we wer e

17

doi ng bef or e and di s c us s t he i t ems t hat wer e on Ex hi bi t 1

18

t hat was mar k ed at t he f i r s t ex ami nat i on.

19

s t ar t ed wi t h t hat , t wo t hi ngs .

20

of t he r ec ei pt s f r om t he i t ems t hat wer e damaged or t he

21

r epl ac ement i t ems t hat y ou pur c has ed?

22

23

c l ai m?

24

No.

25

No.

Bef or e I get

One, hav e y ou br ought any

Can y ou guar ant ee me y ou' r e goi ng t o pay t he

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page41
7
9 of 336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page42
10of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

1
2

Ok ay .

t hat guar ant ee.

Sec ond, I don' t hav e t he abi l i t y t o mak e


I mean I c oul d s ay y es and I - -

I ' m not goi ng t o was t e my t i me.

Al l r i ght .

I di dn' t hav e t o do i t f or pr ev i ous i ns ur anc e

6
7
8
9
10

c l ai ms l i k e t hi s .
Q

So I ' m not goi ng t o do i t f or t hi s one.

Al l r i ght .

Sec ond, y ou had s ent me an emai l I

t hi nk i ndi c at i ng t hat y ou had ot her i t ems t o add?


A

Ev er y day .

Ser i ous l y , ev er y day .

i nj unc t i on t ak es c ar e of ev er y t hi ng.

I ' m hopi ng t hi s

So we' l l s ee.

11

12

but - -

13

I t has ev er y t hi ng t o do wi t h ev er y t hi ng.

14

Al l r i ght .

15

Let me r ead y ou t he r el i ef I ' m r eques t i ng,

16

I ' m not s ur e i t has any t hi ng t o do wi t h t hi s c l ai m

And y ou f i l ed - -

emer genc y r el i ef .

17

Fi l ed i n t he 3r d Ci r c ui t y ou s ai d?

18

No, Lanc as t er Count y Cour t of Common Pl eas .

19

Oh, ok ay .

20

I f i l ed one i n ' 09, and t he j udge r ul ed on i t .

21

So

I ' m hopi ng s he wi l l on t hi s one.

22

What i s t he doc k et number ?

23

I di dn' t get one y et .

24

Ok ay .

25

I ' l l r ead i t .

I j us t f i l ed i t y es t er day .

Rel i ef s ought by Pl ai nt i f f .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page42
10
8 of
of336
34
87

The

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page43
11of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

Compl ai nant s eek s i mmedi at e r el i ef f r om t he abov e i n t he

f or m of s anc t i ons and f i nes f or t hos e gui l t y of ex t or t i on

and embez z l ement and t hos e wi t hhol di ng ac c ount s

r ec ei v abl es .

l aw enf or c ement agenc i es t hat c ont i nue abus e of pr oc es s .

Compl ai nant s eek s i mmedi at e r el i ef f r om publ i c of f i c i al s

f or obs t r uc t i ng j us t i c e and due pr oc es s .

r el i ef i nas muc h as t he Cour t s ar e abl e wi t h r egar ds t o t he

har as s ment and t or t ur e f r om t hos e k nown of s uc h c r i mes .

Compl ai nant s eek s i mmedi at e r el i ef f r om t he

Compl ai nant s eek s

10

The Compl ai nant s eek s r el i ef f r om s t al k i ng and

11

har as s i ng nei ghbor s and r equi r es l aw enf or c ement t o mak e

12

s ur e hous ehol ds c an i dent i f y al l oc c upant s and pr ov e t hey

13

ar e ent i t l ed t o t he l eas e and/ or deed.

14

s eek s r el i ef by awar di ng t he Compl ai nant hi s pr o s e

15

bi l l i ngs i nv oi c e.

16

t he Compl ai nant s ummar y j udgment i n al l c as es f i l ed bef or e

17

t he Lanc as t er Count y Cour t of Common Pl eas i n r et al i at i on

18

f or t he ar r oganc e of bot h t he l oc al l aw enf or c ement

19

c ommuni t y and t he j udi c i al s y s t em f or t he s y s t emat i c abus e

20

of pr oc es s and t he ex t r eme nat ur e of t he obs t r uc t i on of

21

j us t i c e, whi c h i n i t s el f i s r es pons i bl e f or put t i ng t he

22

Compl ai nant ' s l i f e i n har m' s way on a dai l y bas i s .

23

J une 27t h, 2016.

24
25

The Compl ai nant

The Compl ai nant s eek s r el i ef by awar di ng

Al l r i ght .

Changi ng gear s .

Goi ng bac k t o t he

l i s t her e of i t ems t hat y ou' v e s ubmi t t ed.

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page43
11
9 of
of336
34
87

Dat e,

I t hi nk we l ef t

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page44
12of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

10

of f t al k i ng about t he c os t of r epai r s f or y our c omput er s

whi c h wer e hac k ed.

goi ng t o mov e ont o t he nex t i t em, whi c h i s a wet dr y v ac .

So we t al k ed about t hat .

Ok ay .

Tel l me about t hat .

Let ' s s ee what t hey di d t o t hat one.

And we' r e

Oh, t hey

bur nt t he mot or out .

Ok ay .

Oh, boy , t hat happened f ai r l y r ec ent l y .

When di d t hat happen?


That

10

happened - - bec aus e I j us t r epl ac ed i t .

11

Mar c h.

12

on St onehi l l Road i n Cones t oga i n 1995.

13

r epl ac ed i t wi t h was a c ompac t uni t .

14

br ok en was f ul l - s i z ed.

15

power mot or .

16

I t hi nk t he or i gi nal pr i c e of t he one I bought - - I want t o

17

s ay i t was 150.

I ' m goi ng t o s ay

Now t he wet dr y v ac I bought when I bui l t my hous e


Now t he one I

The one t hat was

I t hi nk i t was , l i k e, a t wo hor s e

The one I r epl ac ed i t wi t h I t hi nk was $69.

I t was a Cr af t s man, t he or i gi nal one.

18

I t was 21- y ear s - ol d?

19

Yeah, y eah.

20

Ok ay .

21

Oh, y eah.

22

And one day y ou s t ar t ed - - y ou t r i ed t o us e i t and

23
24
25

Di d y ou us e i t on a r egul ar bas i s ?

i t di dn' t wor k ?
A

Yeah, wor k ed t he day bef or e and t hen i t di dn' t

wor k .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page44
10
12of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page45
13of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

11

Ok ay .

I gues s i t was Febr uar y .

Cor dl es s phone, t el l me about t hat .


I hav e magi c J ac k .

Ar e

y ou f ami l i ar wi t h t hat ?

No.

I t ' s wher e y ou us e t he i nt er net f or y our phone.

Li k e a Voi c e Ov er - -

Yeah.

- - what do t hey c al l t hat - - VOI ?

Onl y i t ' s di f f er ent i n t hat t hey gi v e y ou a modul e

10

t hat y ou c onnec t t o y our c omput er .

11

Al l r i ght .

12

Now what I di d was - - t hey c ame out wi t h a new

13

v er s i on wher e y ou c onnec t i t t o y our Comc as t r out er s o t hat

14

i ns t ead of - - bef or e wi t h t he ol d v er s i on, y ou had t o hav e

15

t he c omput er on f or t he phone t o wor k .

16

I upgr aded t o t he new v er s i on and c onnec t ed i t t o my

17

Comc as t s er v er .

18

So I went t o Radi o Shac k and bought a new c or dl es s phone.

19

Wel l , i t l as t ed a mont h and does n' t wor k any mor e.

So I s wi t c hed ov er .

So t hat means t he magi c J ac k i s l i v e 24/ 7.

20

Di d y ou t ak e i t bac k ?

21

No.

22

Why not ?

23

J us t t oo bus y .

What I do on t hat l i ne - - I

24

f or war d i t any way t o my c el l phone number , and I was us i ng

25

i t j us t , y ou k now, s por adi c al l y .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page45
11
13of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page46
14of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

12

1
2

I woul d t hi nk af t er a mont h t hey woul d - - t hey

woul d r epl ac e i t ?

pr i or i t i es .

r epl ac e i t .

I woul d t hi nk s o.

Oh, boy , what a mes s t hat was .

They pr obabl y woul d.

I ' m j us t t oo bus y , j us t

I mean I c oul d pr obabl y t ak e i t bac k now and

Cabl e box es and modem.


Ok ay .

Let ' s s ee.

I gues s i n Febr uar y or Mar c h I went t o upgr ade al l my c abl e

box es .

And at t he s ame t i me, s omebody f r om Comc as t t ol d me

10

t hat i f I hook up t o Comc as t Bus i nes s I woul d get a mor e

11

s ec ur e i nt er net c onnec t i on and a f as t er c onnec t i on.

12

hook up t o Comc as t Bus i nes s on a 60 day t r i al .

13

me a box , a new - - or , i n f ac t , no, t hey c ame out and

14

i ns t al l ed i t - - a new r out er .

15

r ev er s ed ev er y t hi ng and s ai d no, i t ' s not mor e s ec ur e.

16

I di s c onnec t ed i t .

17

my c abl e box es , but t hey nev er wor k ed.

18

bac k and f or t h t o Comc as t t wo or t hr ee t i mes .

19

t ec hs woul d c ome out .

20

I don' t k now i f peopl e put c hi ps i n t hem.

21

t hey j us t s abot aged t hem or what .

So I

They s end

And af t er t wo week s , t hey


So

Then I went t o Comc as t and upgr aded al l


I mean I was goi ng
Ser v i c e

They c oul dn' t f i nd t he pr obl em.

I don' t k now i f

22

You don' t k now why t hey ' r e not wor k i ng?

23

Comc as t does n' t ev en k now why .

They c oul dn' t

24

ev en - - I ' d get bi l l ed f or HBO f or t hr ee mont hs , and I

25

nev er had HBO.

I mean i t woul dn' t wor k .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page46
12
14of
of336
87
34

So

And I k ept

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page47
15of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

13

get t i ng on t he phone wi t h c us t omer s er v i c e s pendi ng t wo

hour s - - one t i me t wo and a hal f hour s , and i t s t i l l di dn' t

wor k .

They s t i l l c oul dn' t f i x i t .

Ok ay .

That was pr obabl y t wo mont hs ago, t hr ee mont hs

How l ong ago was t hat ?

ago, af t er t he f i r s t of t he y ear , pr obabl y t he s ec ond

quar t er .

Ar e t hey s t i l l t r y i ng t o f i x t he pr obl em?

I s t opped t r y i ng.

10

Ok ay .

11
12

I mean I j us t - - y ou k now.

The 100 dol l ar c os t t o r epl ac e, i s t hat

j us t t he v al ue of t he c abl e box es and t he modems or modem?


A

Yeah, I gues s what t hey di d i s t hey bi l l ed me.

13

Comc as t Bus i nes s bi l l ed me.

14

y eah, t hat ' s bas i c al l y what i t i s .

They al l bi l l ed me.

I mean,

15

They bi l l ed y ou mor e bec aus e i t was a bus i nes s - -

16

Oh, y eah - - no, t hey bi l l ed me bec aus e t hey woul d

17

not ac c ept t he r et ur n of t he modem.

18

t hen, and t hey woul dn' t pi c k i t up.

19
20
21
22

I c oul dn' t r et ur n i t

Do y ou hav e any wr i t t en c or r es pondenc e bet ween

y our s el f and Comc as t ov er t he i s s ue?


A

Yeah, I hav e not es .

I hav e - - y eah, I hav e emai l s

I gues s , y eah.

23

Do y ou hav e any of t hem wi t h y ou?

24

No.

25

Woul d y ou be wi l l i ng t o f or war d t hos e t o me?

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page47
13
15of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page48
16of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

14

Yeah, I c an di g t hos e up, s omet hi ng per t ai ni ng t o

t hat .

But i t was a mes s .

I ev en

t hi nk I r ec or ded t he one t ec h t hat c ame t o my door .

He got

s mar t wi t h me.

5
6
7

Q
t hi s .
A

I mean I f or get ex ac t l y .

I had t o t hr ow hi m of f my pr oper t y .

I ' m pr obabl y goi ng t o but c her t he pr onunc i at i on of


I s i t Sak r et e or Sak r et e?
Oh, Sak r et e, y eah.

Li s t en what t hey di d.

had - - I was put t i ng pos t hol es - - put t i ng pos t s i n my bac k

y ar d f or a s i x f oot wooden f enc e.

And what t hes e k i ds nex t

10

door wer e doi ng was t hey wer e goi ng and wet t i ng t he bags ,

11

r ui ni ng t he whol e bag.

12

k now how heav y Sak r et e i s when i t ' s har dened c ement ?

Now t hat ' s not t he i s s ue.

Do y ou

13

Yeah, I got a s ens e f or t hat .

14

I had t o br eak i t up and put i t i n buc k et s and

15

t ak e i t out t o t he al l ey .

16

So bas i c al l y t hey r ui ned t he bags ?

17

Oh, y eah.

18

Made t hem unus abl e?

19

Yeah.

20

Al l r i ght .

21

Yeah.

22

I s t hat $4 a bag or - -

23

Yeah.

And y ou hav e $12 t her e?

That ' s not t he hal f of i t .

They f i l l ed i n

24

t he hol es bef or e I c oul d - - I had t o di g t he hol es out t wo

25

or t hr ee t i mes .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page48
14
16of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page49
17of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

15

When y ou s ay t hey , agai n who i s t hey ?

I as s ume i t ' s t he peopl e nex t door .

They ar e t he

ones who s i c t he pi t bul l on me t hat I had t o go t o t he

hos pi t al f or t wo week s ago.

Oh, gees .

Oh, y eah.

Ar e y ou al l r i ght ?

I had t o go t o t he ER and t ak e ant i bi ot i c s f or 10

9
10
11

day s .
Q

Ok ay .

The nex t i t em I hav e i s j us t mi s c el l aneous

c l ot hes , $100?

12

Yeah, t hey ar e al way s r ui ni ng my c l ot hes .

13

Rui ni ng t hem or s t eal i ng t hem?

14

Bot h.

15

When y ou s ay r ui ni ng t hem, what do y ou mean by

16
17

t hat ?
A

They ' l l put s pot s on t hem s o I c an' t wear t hem,

18

t he s hi r t s , or t hey ' l l s hr i nk t hem.

19

s l i pper s t hey mak e bi g.

20

k i nds of t r i c k s .

They ' v e done t hat .

So I c an' t wear t hos e.

My

I mean al l

21

I ' m s or r y ?

22

Sl i pper s bi g.

23

They made t hem bi g.

24

I f y ou - - I hav e t hos e t hr ee ex per t s I ment i oned.

25

They made - So I c an' t wear t hem.

They al l t al k about - - t he f i r s t t hi ng t hey do i n t hes e

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page49
15
17of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page50
18of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

16

pr ogr ams i s br eak i nt o y our hous e, and i t ' s i mpos s i bl e,

i mpos s i bl e t o f i nd out how t hey get i n.

And I t hi nk we t al k ed about t hi s l as t t i me y ou

wer e her e.

You don' t hav e any s i gns of f or c ed ent r y ?

For c ed ent r y ?

Yes , a br ok en wi ndow - -

No - - -

- - a br ok en door .

- - i n ' 87, I di d.

10

Wel l , I had f or c ed ent r y by t he

Lanc as t er Ci t y Pol i c e l as t J ul y on a 302 war r ant .

11

Yeah, y ou t ol d me about t hat .

12

But ot her t han t hat , f or c ed ent r y , no, no.

13
14
15
16

Si gns

of ent r y , but not f or c ed.


Q

When y ou s ay s i gns of ent r y , y ou def i ne t hat by

t he f ac t t hi ngs wer e mi s s i ng?


A

Mov ed, mi s s i ng, l i ght s on t hat wer e of f or of f

17

t hat wer e on, t hi ngs l i k e t hat .

18

por c h - - y ou k now, i f I go out i n t he ev eni ng, I ' l l l eav e

19

my f r ont por c h l i ght on.

20

and, y ou k now, har d t o get i n, y ou k now, t o s ee y our k ey

21

hol e and t hi ngs l i k e t hat .

22

23

c i gar et t es ?

The ot her ni ght my

Wel l , I c ame home and i t ' s of f

I t ' s har as s ment .

The nex t i t em y ou hav e i s v apor el ec t r oni c

24

25

c i gar et t es .

Oh, y eah, now t hey hel p y ou r educ e s mok i ng r egul ar

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page50
16
18of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page51
19of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

17

Thes e ar e t he E- Ci gs ?

Yeah, but t hey ar e t he pens wi t h c ar t r i dges .

ar e ex pens i v e.

l i k e at Tur k ey Hi l l or s omet hi ng.

t hat - - t hey ar e t hr ee i n one.

or dr y her bs .

ni c ot i ne.

t hi nk , I t hi nk one af t er t hat .

They

They ar e not t he ones y ou buy i n t he s t or e


Thes e ar e t he ones

You c an s mok e wax es , oi l s

Now what I get i s , l i k e, s i x mi l l i gr ams of

I t ' s i n l i qui d f or m.

They s t ol e my f i f t h one I

Al l f r om home?

10

Oh, y eah, y eah, al l f r om home, y eah, f i v e of t hem.

11

I mean t hat s ounds l i k e t he k i nd of t hi ng - - I

12
13
14
15
16
17

mean I ' m f amous f or l eav i ng t hi ngs behi nd at r es t aur ant s .


A

Oh, no, no, no, no, no, I don' t l eav e t hi s behi nd.

No, no, t hey wer e s t ol en.


Q

Same t hi ng, y ou don' t k now when t hey got i n, how

t hey got i n, but t hey ar e j us t not t her e any mor e?


A

Wel l , I mean i n 2009 - - l et me gi v e y ou an

18

ex ampl e.

19

doc ument dai l y i n j our nal s al l t he i nc i dent s t hat I ' m

20

des c r i bi ng.

21

ev er y day .

I n 2010, I s ai d I hav e enough doc ument at i on.

22

That ' s i t .

I mean i t ' s a f ul l - t i me j ob.

23

t hos e.

24

Yeah.

25

I c an s end y ou t hos e.

Ok ay .

Thi s i s what I us ed t o do.

I us ed t o

I di d t hat f or about a y ear , v er y det ai l ed,

I c an s end y ou

I mean I hav e t hos e i n PDF f or m.

I mean I c an emai l t hos e t o

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page51
17
19of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page52
20of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

18

y ou.

t he Cour t ?

Thi s whol e t hi ng i s t he emer genc y i nj unc t i on.

Al l r i ght .

I t l ook s l i k e t hi s i s s omet hi ng t hat ' s f i l ed wi t h

Wel l , I mean t hat s houl d be av ai l abl e

onl i ne.

I ' d s ay t hr ee day s .

Thi s i s f i l ed wi t h t he pr ot honot ar y - -

Yes .

10

- - i n Ci v i l Cour t ?

11

Yeah, I c an s how y ou t he s t amped pages .

I j us t

12

had t o mak e c opi es .

13

I ' m wai t i ng f or a c ar t r i dge t o be del i v er ed t oday .

14

y ou page t o t he l ef t , y ou' l l s ee t he t hr ee pages t hat wer e

15

s t amped.

My t oner my s t er i ous l y went out , and


But i f

16

That ' s not what I was s uppos ed t o get t her e.

17

Ther e y ou go.

18
19
20
21

down.
Q

I f y ou s wi pe i t - - no, i t ' s up and

Ther e i s f our pages s t amped t her e.


Yeah, i t j us t has t he t i me s t amp on i t .

It

does n' t hav e t he doc k et number .


A

No, y eah, t hey di dn' t - - I gues s I c oul d hav e

22

may be got t hem t o gi v e me a doc k et number , but t hey di dn' t .

23

You k now, I di dn' t pus h i t .

24

Al l r i ght .

25

Her e y ou c an s ee t he - - t her e' s t he s t at e c ov er

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page52
18
20of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page53
21of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

19

s heet .

Yeah, t hey di dn' t s t amp i t wi t h a doc k et number

ei t her .

Thi s i s t he c i v i l c ov er s heet .

Ok ay .

And t hi s i s t he f i r s t page of t he i nj unc t i on.

J udge Mar gar et Mi l l er r ul ed on mi ne i n ' 09 and

es s ent i al l y - - i t was s i mi l ar t o t hi s .

what s he s ai d was t hat I di dn' t pr ov i de her enough ev i denc e

10

f or her t o r ul e i n my f av or .

11

s he s ai d.

12

v i c t i m of mi nd c ont r ol .

13

bec aus e I got c or r obor at i ng wi t nes s es .

I n a nut s hel l , t hat ' s what

Pl us s he s ai d s he di dn' t r eal l y bel i ev e I was a


But t hi s t i me i t ' s a l ot di f f er ent

14

Ok ay .

15

Dr . Ni c k Begi c h.

16

Who ar e t he c or r obor at i ng wi t nes s es ?


He' s an ex per t i n mi nd c ont r ol

t ec hnol ogi es .

17

Wher e i s he out of ?

18

Al as k a.

19

And es s ent i al l y

Admi ni s t r at i on.

Hi s f at her was k i l l ed by t he Hoov er


He was a U. S. c ongr es s man.

20

What was t he l as t name agai n?

21

Begi c h, B- e- g- i - c - h.

I ' m s or r y .

Now hi s br ot her j us t

22

f i ni s hed a t er m i n Congr es s l as t y ear i n t he Senat e.

23

Any way , hi s f at her bac k i n - - I f or get what y ear i t was - -

24

was t r av el i ng wi t h t he Speak er of t he Hous e, Way ne Boggs ,

25

and t hey wer e bot h k i l l ed i n a pl ane ac c i dent .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page53
19
21of
of336
87
34

And t hey

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page54
22of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

20

wer e r ai s i ng hel l about Hoov er wi t h hi s CoI nt el Pr ogr am.

So any way , Ni c k Begi c h began doi ng r es ear c h on t he HARP

I ns t al l at i on i n Al as k a, whi c h i s a 180 ant enna ar r ay t hat

i s t he f oc us or t he bas i s f or el ec t r omagnet i c weapons .

I t ' s c al l ed HARP.

c onv i nc ed t he Eur opean Par l i ament t o ban el ec t r omagnet i c

weapons .

t r ans c r i pt of hi s l ec t ur e i n Oc t ober of 2015, and he gav e a

l ec t ur e dur i ng t he Cov er t Har as s ment Conf er enc e i n Bel gi um.

10

Now bac k about ei ght y ear s ago, he

So he' s a r enowned ex per t .

Now I hav e a

I t hi nk i t was Bel gi um.

11

Ok ay .

12

Yes , t hen I hav e Kar en St ewar t .

13

You ment i oned her .

14

Kar en St ewar t i s a f or mer NSA whi s t l ebl ower .

15

Nat i onal Sec ur i t y Agenc y when y ou s ay NSA?

16

Yeah, y eah.

Do y ou hav e ot her wi t nes s es ?

She bl ew t he whi s t l e i n 2004.

Now

17

s he j us t emai l ed me t hr ee week s ago.

18

i nf or mat i on, and s he emai l ed me bac k and s ai d t hank y ou f or

19

it.

20

det er mi ned t hat s ome weaponr y t hat was bei ng us ed ov er i n

21

Af ghani s t an and I r aq was n' t per f or mi ng up t o s t andar ds .

22

And s he mor e or l es s dr ew at t ent i on t o i t t o t he U. S.

23

Mi l i t ar y , and s omebody t ook c r edi t f or her wor k .

24

bec ame an NSA whi s t l ebl ower .

25

s ame pr obl ems I di d, peopl e br eak i ng i n her hous e,

I emai l ed s ome

Any way , s he - - es s ent i al l y what happened was s he

And s he

Then s he s t ar t ed hav i ng t he

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page54
20
22of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page55
23of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

21

el ec t r omagnet i c weapon at t ac k s , t hi ngs l i k e t hat .

Now t he NSA i s c r i t i c al f or t wo r eas ons .

I bl ew

t he whi s t l e on I SC, t he Lanc as t er f i r m s el l i ng ar ms t o

I r aq.

was wi t h t he NSA.

di r ec t or of t he NSA, was on t hei r boar d of di r ec t or s .

al s o owns a c ompany t hat deal s i n mi nd c ont r ol .

Bi l l Cl i nt on nomi nat ed hi m t o be t he Sec r et ar y of Def ens e,

and he wi t hdr ew bec aus e of t he I SC s c andal .

Thei r f i r s t pr ogr am - - t hei r f i r s t c ont r ac t i n 1973


Bobby Ray I nman, who was t he f or mer
He

I n 1994,

Pl us on Mar c h

10

9t h, t he NSA t ook me i nt o c us t ody , f al s e i mpr i s oned me f or

11

an hour and a hal f and had ei ght s ec ur i t y pol i c e

12

i nt er r ogat e me f or no r eas on.

13

Of t hi s y ear , Mar c h of t hi s y ear ?

14

Yeah, down i n For t Meade.

15

Wher e i s For t Meade?

16

That ' s t he NSA.

17

I s For t Meade i n Col or ado?

18

Mar y l and.

19

Oh, I ' m s or r y .

20

Dogs at my c ar , handc uf f ed me, i nt er r ogat ed me and

21

t hen t ol d me I c oul dn' t go down t o Was hi ngt on, D. C. and

22

t ol d me I was n' t al l owed on f eder al pr oper t y any mor e, whi c h

23

was a l i e.

24

of t hem.

25

I wal k ed away and es s ent i al l y made a f ool out

Kar en St ewar t , wher e i s s he l oc at ed?

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page55
21
23of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page56
24of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

22

Wel l , s he wor k ed down i n For t Meade, Mar y l and, but

s he s i nc e - - af t er s he bl ew t he whi s t l e and s t ar t ed hav i ng

s y mpt oms , s he mov ed t o Fl or i da - - I bel i ev e t hat ' s wher e

s he' s at now - - wi t h f ami l y .

Ok ay .

I got a l i t t l e s i det r ac k ed t her e.

Let me

br i ng y ou bac k t o t he nex t i t em, whi c h i s HVLP t i ps .

t hey r el at ed t o t he c i gar et t es ?

8
9

A
s pr ay er .

Ar e

No, no, t hat ' s a hi gh- v ol ume, l ow- pr es s ur e pai nt


What t hey di d was - - I bought a us ed one at t he

10

Reus e I t St or e of f of Pi t ney Road out near Gr eenf i el d

11

I ndus t r i al Par k .

12

c ome wi t h i t , s o di f f er ent v el oc i t i es f or t he pai nt , l i k e

13

s mal l er and l ar ger .

14

i ns t r uc t i on manual and br us hes t o c l ean i t .

15

ev er y t hi ng i n a c l ear pl as t i c bag t o k eep i t al l t oget her .

16

I went t o us e t he s pr ay er , and t he bag was gone.

17

t o go out and buy a br and- new HVLP.

18

one I bought - - I t hi nk I pai d 60 f or i t .

19
20
21

Ok ay .

And I br ought i t home, and I put - - t i ps

I t c omes wi t h t hr ee t i ps .

Ti ps .

So I put

So I had

I t c os t me $119.

The

You hav e a quant i t y l os t t wo and t hen

es t i mat ed c os t t o r epl ac e 45.


A

I t had an

What di d y ou l os e t wo of ?

Yeah, what t hey di d was t hey put t he s mal l

22

t i p i n.

23

y ou k now, y ou need t he l ar ger t i p.

24

t hought I c oul d r epl ac e t he t i ps , but y ou c an' t .

25

t o r epl ac e t he whol e t hi ng.

So I ' m t r y i ng t o s pr ay s t ai n f or my f enc e, and,

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page56
22
24of
of336
87
34

But I s ai d 45.

I
So I had

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page57
25of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

23

1
2

Ok ay .

I don' t mean t o be r edundant .

So I ' m j us t

goi ng t o as k y ou - -

That ' s al l r i ght .

- - a bl ank et ques t i on her e i f i t appl i es t o al l of

t hes e i t ems her e, and I ' l l s how i t t o y ou.

i t ems , y ou don' t hav e - - or y ou' r e not wi l l i ng t o pr oduc e a

r ec ei pt .

8
9

For al l t hes e

Cor r ec t ?
Onl y i f y ou gi v e me a guar ant ee t hat y ou' r e goi ng

t o pay t he c l ai m.

10

And I ' v e t ol d y ou I c an' t do t hat .

11

Ok ay .

12

None of t hes e i t ems hav e been r epor t ed as l os t or

13

s t ol en or damaged t o t he pol i c e.

Cor r ec t ?

14

To t he pol i c e?

15

Yes .

16

I ' m i n t hi s i nj unc t i on ac c us i ng t he pol i c e of

17

t r y i ng t o k i l l me.

No, I mean I c an' t .

18

Al l r i ght .

19

That ' s what abus e of pr oc es s i s .

20
21

And none of t hes e i t ems - I t ' s when t he

pol i c e do not t ak e y our c ompl ai nt s .


Q

And f or any of t hes e i t ems , y ou do not hav e - - y ou

22

c an' t t el l me s pec i f i c al l y who i t was who s t ol e i t or br ok e

23

i t or what ev er t he c as e may be?

24

No.

25

Al l r i ght .

I ' m not goi ng t o k eep as k i ng t hat

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page57
23
25of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page58
26of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

24

1
2

ques t i on.
A

I c an - - I c an t el l y ou t hi s .

Si nc e 2006, t he

nei ghbor s at 1252 Fr emont St r eet hav e been engaged i n a

c ons t ant har as s ment and t hr eat c ampai gn no mat t er who i s i n

t hat hous e.

Has t her e been a c hange i n - -

Oh, y eah, t hr ee t i mes .

I s i t a r ent al hous e?

Yes .

10

Do y ou k now who t he c ur r ent r es i dent s ar e?

11

No, t hey don' t t el l me t he t r ut h, no.

I mean I

12

f i l ed a pr i v at e c r i mi nal c ompl ai nt agai ns t t hem i n t he

13

Count y D. A. ' s Of f i c e t hi s y ear .

14

har as s me.

15

happened J une 10t h.

16

Cent er on Col l ege Av enue.

17

and 10 Vi c odi n.

18

s hot s , but I di dn' t do i t .

19

hav e t he hos pi t al r epor t .

They ar e Spani s h.

They

They ar e t he ones who s i c t he dog on me.

That

I went t o Lanc as t er Regi onal Medi c al


Dr . Wes t phal gav e me ant i bi ot i c s

Now he want ed me t o go t hr ough r abi es


I s ai d t he dog was n' t r abi d.

20

The nex t i t em i s a s t apl e ai r gun?

21

Ri ght .

22

That was t hef t .

23

t hef t ?

24

Yeah, t hef t .

25

When was t hat ?

They s t ol e my s t apl e ai r gun.


That was n' t damaged.

That was

That was t hef t .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page58
24
26of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page59
27of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

25

Thi s al l - - t hi s al l happened when I s t ar t ed

er ec t i ng t he new s i x f oot f enc e and a s c r eened- i n por c h i n

my bac k .

And I s t ar t ed c ons t r uc t i on Mar c h 10t h.

So s omet i me af t er Mar c h 10t h?

Yeah.

And I don' t k now i f I as k ed y ou about t he HVLP

t i ps .

But when wer e t hos e t ak en?

I ' m goi ng t o s ay i n May .

Of t hi s y ear ?

10

Yeah.

11

I al s o don' t t hi nk I as k ed y ou about t he f i v e

12
13

v apor el ec t r oni c c i gar et t e c ar t r i dges .


A

Ok ay .

I bought my f i r s t one - - l et me s ee.

14

s ay t hat was al l af t er J anuar y 1s t .

15

af t er J anuar y 1s t .

16

I bought one at t he c onv eni enc e s t or e on Manor or

17

Mi l l er s v i l l e Pi k e, Her s hey Av enue.

18
19
20
21
22

I' d

Yeah, t hey wer e al l

I bought one downt own at Puf f N'

St uf f .

I n doi ng t he mat h her e, i t l ook s l i k e t hey go f or

about 50 t o $60 a pi ec e?
A

Yeah, s ome ar e - - t hat ' s t he mi ni mum.

l as t one I bought was $79.


Q

Ok ay .

I t hi nk t he

That ' s t he mi ni mum pr i c e.

The nex t one i s a bel t f or $9.

Ar e we

23

t al k i ng about , y ou k now, a bel t t o hol d y our pant s up, t hat

24

k i nd of bel t ?

25

Yeah, y eah.

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page59
25
27of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page60
28of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

26

St ol en, damaged?

St ol en.

When?

Wi t hi n t he pas t t wo mont hs .

The nex t one i s a 36 i nc h by 100 f eet - -

Oh, y eah.

- - bl ac k s c r een?

That was t o do my s c r eened- i n por c h.

r epl ac e i t .

10

St ol en?

11

St ol en.

12
13
14

I n f ac t , I j us t bought t hat - - I r epl ac ed

t hat pr obabl y a mont h ago.


Q

I ' m s or r y ?

You j us t r epl ac ed t he s c r een f or t he

s c r eened- i n por c h?

15

Yeah, i t ' s a r ol l .

16

Ri ght .

17
18
19
20
21

r ol l .
A

I t ' s 100 by - -

I ' m f ami l i ar wi t h t hem.

So i t was on t he

Somebody j us t t ook t he r ol l ?
Yeah, i t was i n a pl as t i c bag, y eah, pl as t i c

s l eev e, y eah, t ook t he whol e r ol l .


Q

Ok ay .

And t he l as t one i s one pai r of wor k

gl ov es ?

22

Yeah.

23

I k now what wor k gl ov es ar e.

24

Yeah.

25

I had t o

Now her e' s what t hey do.

A l ot of t i mes

t hey ' l l s t eal i t and t hen a week l at er t hey ' l l r et ur n i t .

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page60
26
28of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page61
29of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

27

I mean t hey pl ay games l i k e t hat .

war f ar e al ong wi t h t he t hef t and damages .

I t ' s ps y c hol ogi c al

Wer e any of t hes e i t ems ev er r et ur ned t o y ou?

Some.

5
6

Some wer e.

I mean I c an' t k eep t r ac k .


Q

Ok ay .

l i st .

pos s es s i on.

Then t hey ' d s t eal t hem agai n.


I t ' s har d t o k eep t r ac k of i t .

As of t oday , ar e - - her e, I ' l l s how y ou t he

Tel l me i f any of t hos e i t ems ar e i n y our

Let ' s s ee.

Wel l , s ome of t hes e ar e damaged.

10

wi s hed t hey r et ur ned t he v apor el ec t r oni c c i gar et t es .

11

t he wor k gl ov es t hey di d r et ur n.

12

t hem.

13

14

t oday ?

15

16

t her e.

17

18

I
Now

I f ound wher e t hey put

So t hey ar e i n y our pos s es s i on at l eas t as of

Yes , t hey ar e.

I don' t k now i f t hey ' l l s t ay

Now i s t her e any t hi ng t hat y ou woul d l i k e t o add

t o s uppl ement t o t hi s l i s t ?

19

As f ar as t he l i s t or ev i denc e or what ?

20

No, as f ar as t he l i s t of i t ems .

21

Yeah, I c oul d - - y ou k now, I c an updat e, y eah.

22
23

c an s end t hem t o y ou.


Q

Of any t hi ng t hat y ou woul d add t o t hat l i s t , woul d

24

t hey al l hav e been i t ems i n whi c h wer e l os t or damaged - -

25

s t ol en or damaged i n t he s ame way as t he i t ems t hat we' v e

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page61
27
29of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page62
30of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

28

di s c us s ed?

Oh, y eah, y eah, y eah.

I got t i r ed of mak i ng - -

k eepi ng l i s t s .

t hi nk .

Ok ay .

mor ni ng - - I pr oduc ed an ex hi bi t , a DVD, a di s k wi t h t hi s

c as e t o t he Cour t s .

my s el f .

That happened t hi s mor ni ng.

But I - - wel l , l et me do i t now.

Let me s ee.

Let me

We t al k ed about t he new v apor pen.

Her e i s a f or i ns t anc e.

I went t o - - t hi s

So I hav e t o mak e a c opy t oday f or

The DVD r ec or der does n' t wor k on my c omput er .


Yes t er day - - oh, t hi s mor ni ng

10

I f ound t hat t wo day ' s wor t h of phot os i n my phone wer e

11

mi s s i ng f r om my c omput er .

12

and on.

13

any t hi ng s ubs t ant i al bec aus e I pr obabl y - - wel l , t he t oner

14

c ar t r i dge.

15

t oner get s l ow, i t wi l l gi v e y ou a war ni ng t hat y ou need t o

16

s oon r epl ac e y our t oner .

17

doc ument .

18

out , but i t nev er gav e me t he war ni ng.

19

c apabi l i t y of ac t ual l y hac k i ng i nt o my c opi er bec aus e i t ' s

20

a wi r el es s c opi er .

21
22

Q
of f .

I mean t her e i s not hi ng - - I ' m t r y i ng t o t hi nk of

What happens i s I hav e a c opi er .

And when t he

Wel l , I ' m pr oduc i ng t hi s

And at t he 611t h page, i t s ay s bl ac k i nk t oner


So t hey hav e t he

So I had t o or der a new i nk c ar t r i dge.

Now y ou di d ment i on - - and I don' t mean t o c ut y ou


I s t her e any t hi ng el s e t hat y ou want t o t al k about ?

23

No.

24

Al l r i ght .

25

Yeah, y ou k now, t he l i s t goes on

Now y ou di d ment i on t hat y ou had

s ubmi t t ed t wo s i mi l ar c l ai ms t o ot her i ns ur er s ?

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page62
28
30of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page63
31of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

29

Yeah, y eah.

Tel l me about t hos e.

They wer e i n ' 05 I was pai d and ' 06.

I - - ok ay .

Cones t oga, PA.

about t he s ame, s omewher e ar ound $6, 000.

s c hedul e s i mi l ar t o t hi s , and t hey pai d f r om t hat s c hedul e.

Now what t hey di d was t he one t hey pai d t he c l ai m, but t hey

i nf l at ed t he depr ec i at i on v al ue.

I t ' s when

I t ' s when I l i v ed at 220 St onehi l l Road,


The c l ai ms wer e about - - I t hi nk t hey wer e
I pr oduc ed a

So I f i l ed a c ompl ai nt

10

wi t h t he Penns y l v ani a I ns ur anc e Commi s s i on.

11

no, 2007 or 8, af t er I mov ed t o 1250 Fr emont St r eet , I

12

t r i ed t o f i l e a c l ai m.

13

f i l i ng t hat on my mot her ' s pr oper t y c as ual t y pol i c y .

14

woul d hav e f i l ed anot her c l ai m.

15

Now i n 2006 - -

But my br ot her bl oc k ed me f r om
So I

Now t he i ns ur anc e c ompani es , t hey hav e a dat abas e

16

of al l t he i ns ur anc e c l ai ms t hat ar e pai d out .

17

f ami l i ar wi t h t hat ?

Ar e y ou

18

No.

19

Yeah, t her e' s a dat abas e t hat ac t uar i es us e.

20

don' t k now how y ou ac c es s i t or what .

21

hav e a c or r es pondenc e f r om t he Sout her n Regi onal Pol i c e

22

Depar t ment i n 2006 - - 5 or 6 r egar di ng al l my c ompl ai nt s t o

23

t hem about i nc i dent s r egar di ng v andal i s m and t hef t s .

24

Sout her n Regi onal Pol i c e c ov er ed Cones t oga Towns hi p bac k

25

t hen.

The ot her t hi ng i s I

Now

Now I went t o t r y t o f i nd - - I k now I had paper wor k

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page63
29
31of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page64
32of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

30

on t he c l ai ms .

c l ai ms , but I c an' t f i nd t hem i n my c omput er .

I had c opi es of t he c hec k s , c opi es of t he

Do y ou r emember who t he i ns ur er s wer e?

Har l ey s v i l l e was f or one, may be bot h of t hem, y ou

k now.

And t hey wer e t he s ame t y pe of c l ai ms .

Thef t or damaged or - -

J us t l i k e t hi s , y eah.

I t r i ed t o f i nd t hem.

hav e bac k up di s k s now.

t hr ee l apt op dr i v es and t wo ex t er nal har d dr i v es f r om 2005

Unf or t unat el y , t her e i s - - I hav e

10

and 6 t hat ar e i n my s af et y depos i t box .

11

equi pment s o t hat I c oul d mor e or l es s c onnec t t hos e dr i v es

12

t o my c omput er and r ead t hem, but t he equi pment woul d c ome

13

and i t won' t wor k .

14

unt i l I ' m mor e s ec ur e wi t h t he c omput er hac k i ng, I c an' t do

15

any t hi ng wi t h t hem.

16

ev en t hough t hey t ook t hem f r om my c ur r ent dr i v e.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Q
y ou.

Ok ay .

I or der ed

So I hav e t hem s t or ed.

But , y ou k now,

But I ' m s ur e t he c l ai ms ar e i n t her e

I don' t t hi nk I hav e any mor e ques t i ons f or

I s t her e any t hi ng t hat y ou' d l i k e t o add t o t hi s ?


A

No.

I f y ou c oul d t el l me what y ou want ot her t han

t he r ec ei pt s .
Q

Ther e was a l et t er s ent t o y ou I bel i ev e s omet i me

bet ween t he f i r s t ex ami nat i on and t he s ec ond ex ami nat i on.


A

24

mor ni ng.

25

t hat .

I c oul dn' t f i nd i t .

I t r i ed t o f i nd i t t hi s

That ' s why I as k ed y ou what t i me.

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page64
30
32of
of336
87
34

They s t ol e

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page65
33of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

31

I don' t t hi nk I hav e - -

I t hi nk I hav e a har d c opy , but I di dn' t want t o

r oot t hr ough my f i l e.

and I c oul dn' t f i nd i t .

l et t er f or mat bec aus e I s c an ev er y t hi ng?

6
7

I t r i ed t o f i nd i t on my c omput er
Di d y ou emai l i t or di d i t c ome i n

I bel i ev e I was emai l ed a c opy of i t , but I

t hi nk - - I as s ume i t was s ent t o y ou i n l et t er f or mat .

Ar e y ou t al k i ng about t he one f or m Al l s t at e - -

Yes .

10

- - or t he one f r om y ou?

11

No, no, t he one f r om Al l s t at e.

12

I hav e t hat .

13

That ' s what I ' m t al k i ng about .

14

Yeah, I hav e t hat .

15

That ' s r i ght .

Yeah, I hav e

t hat .

16

They want a doc ument f i l l ed out and - -

17

Ri ght .

18

- - f or war ded bac k t o t hem.

19

Was I s uppos ed t o br i ng t hat t oday ?

20

I t woul d hav e been hel pf ul , but i t ' s not

21

mandat or y .

22

don' t hav e t o s end i t t o me.

I f y ou c oul d get i t bac k t o Mr . Ei s enhar d.

You

23

Ok ay .

24

Ot her t han t hat , y ou k now, I don' t k now t hat t her e

25

was - - what ev er Al l s t at e had r eques t ed.

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page65
31
33of
of336
87
34

The onl y t hi ng I

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page66
34of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

32

1
2

was l ook i ng f or wer e t he r ec ei pt s .


A

3
4

Ok ay .
MR. REESER:

Ok ay .

And we' r e done.

Thank y ou

v er y muc h.

THE WI TNESS:

( Wher eupon, t he ex ami nat i on c onc l uded at 10: 12

Yeah.

a. m. )

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page66
32
34of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page67
35of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

33

COUNTY OF DAUPHI N

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANI A

SS
3

I , Di ane A. Smi t h, a Not ar y Publ i c , aut hor i z ed t o

admi ni s t er oat hs wi t hi n and f or t he Commonweal t h of

Penns y l v ani a, do her eby c er t i f y t hat t he f or egoi ng i s t he

t es t i mony of St anl ey J . Cat er bone.

I f ur t her c er t i f y t hat bef or e t he t ak i ng of s ai d

ex ami nat i on, t he wi t nes s was dul y s wor n; t hat t he ques t i ons

and ans wer s wer e t ak en down s t enogr aphi c al l y by t he s ai d

10

Repor t er - Not ar y Publ i c , and af t er war ds r educ ed t o

11

t y pewr i t i ng under t he di r ec t i on of t he s ai d Repor t er .

12

I f ur t her c er t i f y t hat t he s ai d ex ami nat i on was

13

t ak en at t he t i me and pl ac e s pec i f i ed i n t he c apt i on s heet

14

her eof .

15

I f ur t her c er t i f y t hat I am not a r el at i v e or

16

empl oy ee or at t or ney or c ouns el t o any of t he par t i es , or a

17

r el at i v e or empl oy ee of s uc h at t or ney or c ouns el , or

18

f i nanc i al l y i nt er es t ed di r ec t l y or i ndi r ec t l y i n t hi s

19

ac t i on.

20

I f ur t her c er t i f y t hat t he s ai d ex ami nat i on

21

c ons t i t ut es a t r ue r ec or d of t he t es t i mony gi v en by t he

22

s ai d wi t nes s .

23

I N WI TNESS WHEREOF, I hav e her eunt o s et my hand

24

t hi s 11t h day of J ul y , 2016.


_______________________________________________
Di ane A. Smi t h, Repor t er
Not ar y Publ i c

25

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page67
33
35of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page68
36of
of336
87
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

34

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate Sworn
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBIT
Testimony
AllstateAmicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page68
34
36of
of336
87
34

TuesdayJune
July 12,
28, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page69
37of
of336
87
1

EXAMINATION UNDER OATH OF


STANLEY J. CATERBONE

TAKEN BY:

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

BEFORE:

DIANE F. FOLTZ, RMR


NOTARY PUBLIC

DATE:

JUNE 9, 2016, 9:15 A.M.

PLACE:

LANCASTER COUNTY BAR


ASSOCIATION
28 EAST ORANGE STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page69
37
1 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page70
38of
of336
87
2
1

WITNESSES

NAME

STANLEY J. CATERBONE

BY: MR. REESER

EXAMINATION

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

EXHIBITS

13
14

CATERBONE EXHIBIT

15

1.

LIST OF ITEMS

PRODUCED AND MARKED


13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page70
38
2 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page71
39of
of336
87
3
1
2

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, called as a witness, being


duly sworn, testified as follows:

3
4

EXAMINATION
BY MR. REESER:

Could you state your name, please?

Stanley J. Caterbone, C-a-t-e-r-b-o-n-e.

Would you mind if I called you Stan or Stanley?

Stan.

Stan, okay.

10

And my name's Chris Reeser.

You can

call me Chris.

11

All right.

12

I'm not a real formal guy.

I have been asked to

13

take a statement from you relative to an insurance claim

14

which I understood to have occurred as a result of

15

something on April 3rd of 2016, but by some correspondence

16

that I received from you, my understanding is that is not

17

the date of loss.

18
19

No.

That date is the date that I started the

spreadsheet --

20

Okay.

21

-- of the items lost or vandalized.

22

All right.

This statement is part of the process

23

of collecting information and evaluating the claim.

24

Allstate's policy, as does just about any insurance

25

company's policy, provides that part of the duty of an

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page71
39
3 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page72
40of
of336
87
4
1

insured is to give an examination under oath --

Okay.

-- at the request of the insured -- at the

request of the insurer, so that is what this is.

I've had --

Go ahead.

I've had -- I've collected on two or three

Go ahead.

policies with the same types of claims, and I've never been

put under oath --

10

Okay.

11

-- on the record.

12

So noted.

13

Okay.

14

And I'll ask you about that.

15

And I don't mind under oath.

16

All right.

17

I just, you know --

18

All right.

19

-- have never experienced it.

20

Okay.

22

Sure.

23

This is part of what the insurer is allowed to

21

24
25

Well --

Well, a first time for everything.

This

is --

ask of their insured.


A

Oh, I don't mind at all.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page72
40
4 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page73
41of
of336
87
5
1
2

Okay.

Great.

So I'm going to ask you some

questions about that.

Okay.

I usually when I take these statements -- and

I've taken a couple of them -- have some information about

the claim.

claim.

Okay.

So --

10

Can I give you a brief history --

11

Go.

12

-- to put it in perspective?

13

Yeah.

14

I am a federal whistleblower.

I have very little information about this

Go.
I blew the whistle

15

on International Signal Control or ISC in 1987.

16

indicted in 1991 for a billion dollar fraud and selling

17

illegal arms to Iraq.

18

1987 they --

19

I'm sorry.

20

Yes.

21

operations.

22

Okay.

23

Now, since -- I've been trying to get into

They were

Now, I was a shareholder, and in

You were a shareholder in ISC?

They solicited me to finance some

So I'm a legitimate, bona fide whistleblower.

24

courts, hired various attorneys from '87 all the way up.

25

In 2005 I entered the federal court system as a pro se

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page73
41
5 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page74
42of
of336
87
6
1

litigant.

I filed my own claims.

Okay.

Okay.

Now, here's what happened.

I became a

victim of organized stalking, electronic harassment or mind

control technologies.

show you some expert testimony -- is that what they do is

they break into your home, vandalize, steal, move things

around.

policies making the same types of claims.

Now, what happens is -- and I'll

And since '05 I've collected on two or three

10

losses are not a single-day loss.

11

period of time.

Now, these

They happen over a

12

Okay.

13

And I can't give you dates as far as when what

14

was taken, when that was taken, but that's just a

15

background for your reference as far as this is not an

16

ordinary claim.

17

When you say they, who is they?

18

Well, I don't know, you know.

19

say.

20

be agents.

21

It could be neighbors.

It's impossible to

It could be police.

It could

It could be anybody.
But you believe that they are all in conspiracy

22

to punish you because of your activity as a federal

23

whistleblower?

24
25

A
that.

I'm going to refer you to documents to explain


As a victim of electronic harassment and gang

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page74
42
6 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page75
43of
of336
87
7
1

stalking, the victim -- part of the victimization is that

they break into your home.

Okay.

But you don't know who the they is?

Well, of course not.

Have you ever seen anybody in the act?

I have one person on a security camera video.

Okay.

That was in 2006.

And was there an insurance claim related to that?

10

Not to that particular person, no.

11

All right.

12

But there was a claim that year.

Harleysville

13

paid me once or twice, and there was another one.

14

unfortunately I'm also the victim of computer hacking.

15

These are all the reports from the past year on Geek Squad

16

and other companies reviewing and analyzing and fixing my

17

hard drives after they've been hacked.

But

18

Okay.

19

I filed about, oh, boy, since '06 or '07 probably

20

about four or five IC3 reports with the FBI.

21

I don't know what an IC3 report is.

22

It's an online complaint regarding anything

23

fraudulent online to the FBI.

24

Okay.

25

I've had face-to-face meetings with the FBI

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page75
43
7 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page76
44of
of336
87
8
1

probably about 15 times.

Locally?

Philly and Harrisburg.

Is there a particular agent that you meet with?

No.

Could you tell me the names of any of the agents

No.

that you meet with?

No.

Okay.

10

I can verify the meetings, I mean.

11

What -- what's the reason for the meetings?

12

Complaints --

13

Okay.

14

-- about people, what they're doing to me.

15

You said you're a victim of electronic

16

harassment.

17

Okay.

18

What have been the other forms?

19

They use microwave technology, microwaves to

Now, I understand what computer hacking is.


Electronic harassment.

20

alter your brain state.

21

cause extreme pain in any part of your body.

22

create synthetic telepathy.

23

with the weapons.

24
25

It causes extreme -- they can


They can

They can essentially kill you

Now, in the 1950's the Russians used it against


our -- the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, the same weapons.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page76
44
8 of
of336
51
87

Now,

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page77
45of
of336
87
9
1

in the 1970's there was what's called the Church Committee.

The CIA had to come clean on these programs.

supposed to have stopped them, but they didn't, and that's

-- there's Senate testimony.

then was Stansfield Turner.

Senate, and they admitted to all the programs that I'm

describing.

Okay.

MKUltra was the main program.

10

How do you know that?

11

How do I know what?

12

I mean, how do you know you're a victim of

13

The Director of the CIA back


He testified before the

microwave technology to alter your brain waves?

14
15

They were

Some nights I can't walk.

The pain is that bad.

What do you mean how do I know?

16

I mean, I don't know.

17

Don't get smart with me, or I'll walk out this

I don't know.

18

door.

19
20

I'm not being smart.

I'm trying

to understand this.

21

Okay.

22

How do I -- you know, how do I know I'm not?

23

Do you ever complain about it?

24

I mean, I have pain.

25

pain.

I don't know why I have

I just -- I'm trying to understand.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page
Page77
45
9 of
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page78
46of
of336
87
10
1

Listen, yesterday I filed 300 pages in the

Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a case against Lancaster City

Police and the county residents.

Okay.

There are -- there is expert testimony in here

from, one, an NSA whistleblower named Karen Stewart who

will back up just about everything I say.

from a Julianne McKinney who is a former Army intelligence

officer.

The second is

The third is from a renowned expert named Nick

10

Begich whose father was killed by someone in the Hoover

11

Administration.

12

read them.

There are transcripts in here.

You can

13

Okay.

14

You can learn all about it.

15

May I have this?

16

No.

17

Okay.

18

Or I can give you it in electronic format.

19
20
21
22
23

You can make a copy.

have a PDF around my neck.


Q

I'll give you a copy.

Well, I see that it's a Petition for Allowance of

Appeal which means that it's -A

I'm appealing a Superior Court decision to the

Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

24

Okay.

25

I'm a very successful litigator by the way.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page78
10of
46
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page79
47of
of336
87
11
1

How --

I'm the amicus for Kathleen Kane in her criminal

case in the Superior Court in Philadelphia.

movant for Lisa Michelle Lambert.

I'm also the

Okay.

I've got three Third Circuit cases now that are

7
8
9
10

awaiting decisions.
Q

And this is an appeal from the Lancaster County

Court of Common Pleas.

I assume it went then to the

Superior Court?

11

I took it to the Superior Court, right.

12

Okay.

13

They dismissed it --

14

Okay.

15

-- two weeks before oral arguments.

16

And what happened there?

Oral

arguments were scheduled for May 24th.

17

Okay.

18

They were scheduled since January.

Both cases

19

were arguably -- I mean, maliciously dismissed two weeks

20

before oral arguments.

21

before them.

22

23

Okay.

They didn't want me to appear

Give me some background.

you worked -- maybe I misheard you.

24

No.

25

Okay.

I mean, you said

Did you work for ISC?

You were a stockholder?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page79
11of
47
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page80
48of
of336
87
12
1

Yes.

Okay.

He was a stockbroker back then.

he is?

Gib Armstrong sold me the stock in 1983.

Do you know who

Former Pennsylvania Senator.


Yeah, I'm familiar with the name.

Are you

employed right now?

No, I'm -- I collect Social Security disability

for symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. mind control,

documented, verified.

10

Huh.

11

They've been paying me since '08.

12

Okay.

13

for that?

Do they -- do they pay you by the month

Is it --

14

You never heard of Social Security disability?

15

I have.

16

Yeah.

17

Okay.

18

My first check was for $21,000.

They paid me.

19

applied in '09.

20

'05 when I declared I was full-time telepathic, but they

21

could only pay me back one year.

22

to '09 in one check, and then I've been getting monthly

23

checks ever since.

24
25

Okay.

They declared me disabled in December of

So they paid me back '08

Well, let's talk about this claim a little

bit.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page80
12of
48
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page81
49of
of336
87
13
1

Okay.

I'm going to have this marked as Exhibit 1.

I have a new one here.

Okay.

Well, why don't you -- why don't we mark

-- can I take that, or do you need that?

Yeah.

No.

Okay.

We won't mark the one I have.

Here.

That's updated.

MR. REESER:

Do you want to put a sticker

(List of items produced and marked Exhibit No.

13

1.)

14

BY MR. REESER:

16

Okay.

on there?

12

15

Every day I have stuff

missing.

10
11

This is for you.

All right.

Now, I'm just going to go through

these items that you have --

17

Yeah.

18

-- listed in order from top to bottom.

19

You're

making a claim for a dishwasher?

20

Right.

21

Is this a dishwasher that was in your home?

22

Yeah, but you know -- I'm trying to think what

23

year that was actually broken.

24

Scratch the dishwasher off of that.

25

That might predate this.

The dishwasher is not being claimed, correct?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page81
13of
49
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page82
50of
of336
87
14
1

Yes.

Yes, let's take that off.

All right.

And I should ask you this beforehand.

I kind of lost track.

Your brief or your petition that was

filed to the Supreme Court listed an address of 1250

Freemont Street.

That's -- that's your home address?

Yes.

Okay.

No.

All right.

10

In fact, I sent a copy of the deed in with the

11

claim.

12

13

Does anybody else live there with you?

I believe I saw that, which I think there were a

number of grantees.

14

My brothers.

15

Okay.

16

No.

17

And they wouldn't be insured under the Allstate

18

But none of them live there?

policy?

19

Yeah, they're listed as other insureds.

20

Okay.

21

Yeah.

22

Okay.

23

Do any of these items -- are they owners

of any of the items?

24

No.

25

Okay.

I purchased the policy for everybody.


Front and back door locks?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page82
14of
50
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page83
51of
of336
87
15
1

Right.

Tell me about that.

Okay.

In July of 2015 -- yeah, July, 2015, the

benevolent Lancaster City Police Department served me with

a 302 petition, but what they did was they broke into my

house, smashed in the front door.

to pay for all the locks and the door, but they didn't.

8
9
10

Now, they were supposed

So I had to get a new front door, and I had to


get all the locks changed in the front and back door,
rekeyed.

11

Okay.

12

Mental health warrant.

13

All right.

14

I've had about eight of them.

15

do.

302 petition?

That's what they

That's part of the slander campaign.

16

What do they --

17

That's pretty routine.

18

What do they claim?

19

Well, I'm mentally ill.

20

Okay.

21

That's their -- that's their defense.

22

Is there a form of mental illness that they try

23

I make all this up.

to pin on you?

24

Oh, yeah.

25

What?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page83
15of
51
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page84
52of
of336
87
16
1

Which one do you want?

Oh, there's been more than one?

Bipolar, schizophrenic, delusional disorder, you

4
5
6

What year?

name it.
Q

Okay.

Were you hospitalized or

institutionalized --

Oh, yeah.

-- as a result -- as a result of this one, the

one in July?

10

Oh, yeah, Fairmont.

11

For how long?

12

Oh, that was about five -- eight days, I guess.

13

And how did that end?

14

They always -- they give me a hearing.

15

Then they

have to release me.

16

Okay.

17

They're always pretty much the same.

It started

18

in '87.

19

Harbor Beach Patrol.

20

was making a movie with Tony Bongiovi who owns Power

21

Station Studios, one of the world's most famous recording

22

studios.

23

The first one was was somebody called up the Stone


My resume's in there.

In 1987 we're making a movie.

24

for an office down in Stone Harbor.

25

the movie in New Jersey on the boardwalk.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page84
16of
52
of336
51
87

But in 1987 I

I rented a home

We were going to shoot


Somebody called

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page85
53of
of336
87
17
1

the Stone Harbor Police Department and said I was running

to the beach to kill myself, totally made up, fabricated.

That's how it all started with the mental illness.

Okay.

Okay.

Smashed in your front door?

Oh, yeah, with -- like a drug raid.

So going back to the door for a second --

I stood

there and took pictures of them as they came through.

Do you actually have the pictures?

10

Oh, yeah, it's part of it.

11

Part of?

12

The -- they're in here.

Oh, let me see.

Where

13

are they?

14

are black and white.

15

pages.

16

only reason you could do that is if someone -- is if you

17

knew that someone was in there with a gun to their head.

18

was in -- I was in the upstairs window talking to them

19

trying to get them to get away from me quite honestly.

No, they're in this one.

This one.

No.

These

They're hard to see, but the next two

Totally illegal what they did.

The only way, the

20

Okay.

21

I filed a lawsuit against Lancaster City Police

22

in '08.

23

one of the documents I have here.

It's a federal lawsuit.

In fact, that's part of

24

Is that still ongoing?

25

I withdrew without prejudice because of the

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page85
17of
53
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page86
54of
of336
87
18
1

computer hacking, so I can re-file, go back to it any time

I want.

Okay.

Most of my lawsuits I withdrew without prejudice.

5
6

I just couldn't litigate with all the hacking.


Q

Can -- do you have any photographs that show the

damage to the door?

see a police officer --

I mean, I see a door that's open.

Yeah.

10

-- apparently standing there.

11

Yeah.

12

Okay.

13

In fact, I bought the door at the Habitat reuse

Yeah, I do.

14

it store.

15

to change all the locks.

But what happened was they charged me like $400


Wizard Lock did it.

16

Do you have -- do you have the receipt for that?

17

Yeah, I could dig that up.

18

You don't have it with you right now?

19

No.

20

You bought the door -- I'm sorry -- Habitat?

21

For Humanity.

22

Habitat?

23

Habitat for Humanity.

24

Oh, Habitat for Humanity.

25

The reuse it store.

I'm a little hard of hearing.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page86
18of
54
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page87
55of
of336
87
19
1

Reuse it.

Out on Old Philadelphia Pike back behind

Greenfield.

door than was on there.

The door looks brand new, I mean, a better

The door, the replacement door you bought there?

Yeah.

What about the original door, was that -- had

8
9

that been there for years?


A

No, that was done in 1996.

My mother was part of

10

the Lancaster City Homeowners Rehab or Revitalization or

11

Rehab Program where if you qualify, they'll come in and

12

rehab your home, bring it up to code and put a seven-year

13

lien on your house for the cost of the improvements.

14

year 10 -- 10 or 15 percent comes off, so if you stay in

15

the house for 7 years, it's all free.

16

I see.

17

So the doors are part of that.

18

Okay.

19

'96 at the time.

20

And you may have said this.

21

didn't get it.

22

that -- the replacement door?

23

$20.

24

$20?

25

Yes.

Each

I apologize if I

How much did you actually pay for the door

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page87
19of
55
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page88
56of
of336
87
20
1

But it cost you 400 to get the locks replaced?

Yeah.

And that was done again by?

Wizard.

Wizard.

Locks.

And you can get me the receipt?

Yeah.

And my question about that was going to be did

Yeah.

10

you report this to the police, but I guess given the

11

circumstances --

12

Here's the situation.

I've -- I've been

13

reporting to the police ever since it started, but usually

14

they're part of the program.

15

complaints.

16

to sue them.

17

Okay.

18

I have letters which are a part of the documents

They won't take my

I mean, I had to sue them.

That's why I had

19

going to the police explaining the vandalism and the

20

break-ins that they won't, you know, report on or

21

investigate or...

22

And this happened July of '15?

23

July 8th, I think, yeah, 2015.

24

July 8th, 2015, okay.

25

Was there any other damage

done, physical damage to your house done --

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page88
20of
56
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page89
57of
of336
87
21
1

No.

-- as a result of that incident?

Just the door.

Okay.

5
6

The next one I have on your list is an

Apple Video iPod.


A

Right.

What they did was I can't -- the menu

button doesn't work.

'05 or '06.

Okay.

10

I since bought a replacement for it.

11

All right.

12

Now, that iPod I bought back in 2006,

You bought -- this particular Apple

Video iPod you bought in '05 or '06?

13

Yeah.

14

Where did you buy it at?

15

I might have bought it at a Best Buy in Florida.

16

Okay.

17

Boy, 3, $400 probably.

18

Okay.

19

It's when they first came out, so the video iPods

20

Do you remember what you paid for it?

And then when did you --

were expensive.

21

Yeah.

22

No.

23

-- just an iPod?

24

Right, video iPod.

25

And then you noticed a problem with it when?

This wasn't an iPhone.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page89
21of
57
of336
51
87

This was --

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page90
58of
of336
87
22
1
2

The button, you can't push the button, the main

button.

Okay.

Oh, boy.

fall of '15.

Okay.

No.

-- Best Buy or a repair store?

No, you can't.

10

Why not?

11

Why?

12

I mean, if I had a problem with my iPhone and

14

I'm not going to pay to get it fixed.

15

Okay.

16

I bought a replacement.

17

Okay.

13

18
19
20
21
22
23

When did you discover that?


Let me think.

That was probably in the

Did you take it to --

No.

No.

I --

Why is that -- I'm not -- I don't

understand why that's part of the insurance claim.


A

Because it was in my house and the house is

covered by the insurance.


Q

I mean, how do you know it just didn't -- I mean,

things wear down over time.


A

I mean --

I'm telling you the truth.

If you don't believe

24

me, that's fine, but don't -- don't harass me with

25

questions.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page90
22of
58
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page91
59of
of336
87
23
1
2

I'm here to ask you questions, sir.

trying to get an understanding as to -- things wear out.

I told you what happened.

Okay.

They broke it.

They broke it?

Yes, someone broke it.

All right.

It's funny.

10

One day the button works, and the

next day it doesn't.

11

Okay.

12

Right.

13

How old --

14

I've had probably three stolen.

15

Oh, it was stolen?

16

Oh, yeah.

17

Okay.

18

I don't remember.

19
20
21

I'm just

or four stolen.
Q

Okay.

Bluetooth headset for phone.

When?
In the past year.

I had three

I had to buy replacements.


Well, you list $60, and that sounds about

what the value of a new Bluetooth would be.

22

Oh, no.

23

Oh, okay.

24

Does it say three beside there?

25

No, it doesn't.

No.

That's for three of them, I think.

Well, no.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page91
23of
59
of336
51
87

It says item number,

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page92
60of
of336
87
24
1

but they're consecutive.

not a quantity.

I'm assuming that's not -- that's

Oh, didn't the quantity print out?

that.

Oh, the quantity didn't print out.

be three.

No.

Let me see
That should

All right.

I paid like 20 bucks apiece for them up at Radio

Shack.

Do you have the receipts for them?

10

I'm not going to dig up all these receipts.

11

really not.

12

is harassment.

13
14

Maybe I didn't put the quantity in.

I'm a busy guy.

I'm

I can't be -- you know, this

Does that mean you don't have them, or you're

just not going to -- you're not going to dig them up?

15

I'm not going to take the time to dig them up.

16

Okay.

17

I have all my receipts.

18

back to '80, '82.

19

Okay.

20

I document everything.

21

I have my tax returns

I'm an expert in

information technologies.

22

Where in your house --

23

I have worked all over the world for the record.

24

I did defense contracts, optical publishing.

25

of -- I was one of four companies in the late '80's, early

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page92
24of
60
of336
51
87

I was one

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page93
61of
of336
87
25
1

'90's that could manufacture CD-ROMs, me alone.

business.

were stolen?

Where did I have them?

Yeah.

It depends where I was.

Where were they stolen from?

Most likely either the bedroom which is in the

10

basement.

Okay.

I know my

Where in your house were the headsets that

In the bedroom, living room?

Yeah, the bedroom.

What do you mean?

Yeah.

11

Was there any sign of unlawful entry?

12

No, never is.

13

about that.

14

15

You'll read, the experts tell you

And I assume there was no report to the police

about these --

16

I can't report to the police anymore.

17

Okay.

Is it fair to say that with regard to any

18

of these items you haven't -- so I don't have to keep

19

asking you this, that you didn't report it to the police?

20
21

They get emails from me, but, no, there's no

official report.

22

All right.

23

The last official report I made was two thousand

24

-- was July 8th of 2015.

25

to report the computer hacking, and that night at 11:30

I went down to the police again

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page93
25of
61
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page94
62of
of336
87
26
1

they signed the mental health warrant on me --

Okay.

-- and gave me a bogus incident report.

All right.

The Bluetooth headsets, the three of

them were taken after that?

After what?

After the 302 petition.

Let me think.

Okay.

10
11
12

Yeah.

Yeah.

You don't have any idea who it was who

took them?
A

If I did I'd give you a name and report that to

everybody.

13

Okay.

14

Yes.

The hammer drill.


They broke it.

I'd say March 9th I started

15

my -- I'd say in March, 2016.

16

screened-in porch on my back and a six-foot fence.

17

it worked.

18

buy a replacement.

I'm putting on a new

The next day it didn't.

One day

So I had to go out and

19

How old was it?

20

I bought that one -- that's about the second or

21

third one they broke.

22

probably -- when did I buy that one?

That one I bought on eBay in

23

Do you still have it?

24

No.

25

Did you throw it out?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page94
26of
62
of336
51
87

Maybe '08.

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page95
63of
of336
87
27
1

Yeah.

All right.

You didn't take it someplace to see

if it could be fixed?

No.

What did you buy it for, how much?

How much?

How much.

Oh, boy.

9
10

That was a DeWalt.

I don't know -- $300 I think, 280.

New they're like --

I probably paid -- I

think I paid 60 something for that, somewhere around $60 --

11

Okay.

12

-- on eBay.

13

And then did you buy a replacement for it?

14

Yeah.

15

What did that cost?

16

The replacement I bought at -- oh, the tool store

17

out there next to the off-track betting.

18

of it?

19

Harbor Freight?

20

Harbor Freight.

21

drill.

22

Okay.

24

What is it?

25

Maybe 100?

23

What's the name

Harbor Tools.

I paid I think 60 for the hammer

But you have -- you have 100 listed here,

so -Maybe it was 100.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page95
27of
63
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page96
64of
of336
87
28
1

Maybe.

Okay.

Reciprocating saw.

Yeah.

What they did was they rigged it so that

the blade doesn't stay in.

You can't use it.

It just --

When you turn it on it comes out?

Well, when you use it, it comes out when you're

sawing.

Okay.

You can't -- you can't tighten it.

10

work, but it stopped.

11

I bought that at Lowe's.

12
13

It used to

That replacement I bought -- I think

The one, the one that's broken or the one, the

replacement one?

14

The replacement.

15

Where did you buy the one that's broken?

16

Harbor Tools.

17

Harbor Freight?

18

Harbor Freight.

19

Okay.

20

23
24
25

When did

you buy that?

21
22

Just so we're on the same page.

A
'06.

'05.
Q

Oh, boy.

Let's see.

I might have bought that in

'05, '06.
Okay.

Did you use that on a regular basis or

just once in a while?


A

What do you mean on a regular basis?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page96
28of
64
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page97
65of
of336
87
29
1

Did you use it once a week?

No.

Okay.

No.

No.

No.

No.

Did you use it --

No.

Reciprocating saws I probably used less

than any other tool actually.

I mean, a couple times?

But if I have a project I might use it a lot in a

8
9
10
11
12

two-week span.
Q

Yeah.

I mean, some people are do-it-yourself,

fixer-upper kind of people, and some people -A

Well, I used to have a contracting business in

college.

13

All right.

14

Stan Caterbone Painting and Renovating.

15

But you bought this in '05, '06?

16

assuming --

17

Right.

18

-- you were out of college by then.

19

I'm just saying I have experience.

20
21
22

I mean, I'm

I'm not just

a do-it-yourselfer.
Q

Well, no.

My -- some people do a lot of work

with their tools, and other people --

23

Oh, I do.

24

-- don't.

25

I do.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page97
29of
65
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page98
66of
of336
87
30
1
2

Okay.

And that's what I'm getting at.

I'm

trying to understand.

I do.

I don't.

Okay.

So I could have something for ten years, and it

doesn't get any use at all.

No.

And some people have it --

10

I use my tools.

11

-- for ten years, and they use it every day.

12

I use my stuff.

13

Fair enough.

I understand.

And you got a replacement at

14

Lowe's, and you have $100 here.

15

paid for the replacement?

Is that about what you

16

Uh-huh.

17

Do you have the receipt?

18

Yeah.

19

Okay.

20

Is it fair to say you're not going to dig

that up?

21

No.

22

Okay.

23

I didn't have to for the other claims.

24
25

No.

I'm not going to do that.

I'm not

going to do it for your company.


Q

Okay.

IPhone 5C, was that stolen?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page98
30of
66
of336
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page99
67of
of336
87
31
1

Broken.

When?

In fact, I got scammed on that, the 5C, the end

of last year.

Here's what happened.

They broke it, right,

so I put it on eBay to sell it so someone could reprogram

it, the software.

broken on it because it functioned, everything, but the

software was not functioning.

I assumed the software was what was

Okay.

So I put it on eBay.

10

They hacked my PayPal account.

So someone said that they

11

paid me with electronic funds.

Well, PayPal doesn't use

12

electronic funds.

13

the money.

Right.

Somebody bought it.

PayPal you use your account to transfer

Right.

14

Like a Visa account?

15

What's that?

16

Or a PayPal account.

17

PayPal account.

18

Okay.

19

So what they did was they filed a claim saying

Oh, a PayPal account.

20

that I never sent them the iPhone.

21

it until I got -- until I verified the money was in my

22

account.

I wasn't going to send

23

Uh-huh.

24

But because my PayPal account was hacked, I

25

couldn't access my PayPal account.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen Kane Page
Page99
31of
67
of336
51
87

Right.

Now, in my

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page100
68 of 87
336
32
1

PayPal account I had a cash balance of like $400.

went and awarded them judgment.

judgment.

So eBay

In eBay terms I'm saying

Uh-huh.

So they took the $150 or whatever selling price

out of my account, so I'm out the phone, plus the $150.

Okay.

So they scammed me.

All my accounts are hacked.

I file -- in all the courts I have electronic filing

10

privileges, Third Circuit, U.S. District Court, all the

11

state courts, the local courts.

12

which is the system where you file electronically --

Right.

My PACER account

13

I'm familiar with PACER.

14

-- I've been hacked since, oh, boy, November.

15

So

I got to run down to Philly every two weeks --

16

Okay.

17

-- to get my dockets, just to get dockets for all

18
19
20

my cases.
Q

Let me go back.

I'm -- you lost me on the phone

at some point.

21

Okay.

22

You had the phone.

23

phone?

24

Right, after it was unusable to me.

25

After it was unusable.

You were looking to sell the

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page100
32 of 336
68
51
87

Why was it unusable to

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page101
69 of 87
336
33
1

you?

Because there was a software problem?

It just didn't -- it wouldn't function for me.

Okay.

So I replaced it.

of Apple.

How old was the phone?


I went to Samsung.

I got out

I had too many problems with Apple.

How old --

Apple wouldn't fix it.

Apple wouldn't do this.

They were harassing me on every -- I called customer

service about it, and they had harassed me, and I had to

10

report that, so I said the hell with it.

11

Radio Shack, and under Sprint's program they would pay your

12

old phone off if you're on a contract.

13

have a Samsung.

14
15

So I went to

So I went and now I

How old was the phone at the time that you tried

to sell it through eBay?

16

A couple months old.

17

Okay.

18

Five months old I think.

19

Was it under any warranty program with Apple

I had a warranty through Verizon, but I had to

20
21
22

or --

cut them out.

23

I don't follow you.

24

I had to get off of Verizon.

25

Okay.

So the phone wasn't fixable; you tried to

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page101
33 of 336
69
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page102
70 of 87
336
34
1

sell it; you got scammed on the PayPal?

Yeah.

And eBay basically ruled against you?

Yeah, I can't even access eBay.

I can't buy

anything on eBay anymore.

Okay.

I'm hacked, every -- all my online accounts.

Okay.

Banking, bank accounts, PayPal, eBay, PACER.

10

filed complaints with the FBI, the Pennsylvania Attorney

11

General's Office, everybody.

12

When did this happen?

13

What happen?

14

The phone, the attempt to sell the phone.

15

I think January.

16

Of this year?

17

Yes, '16.

18

Did you file a complaint with the Attorney

19

I think January.

General's Office or --

20

Oh.

21

About this situation?

22

I file complaints with them all the time.

23

Okay.

24

Like I say, I am the amicus for Kathleen Kane in

25

Superior Court Case 1164 EDA 2016.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page102
34 of 336
70
51
87

I filed an amicus brief

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page103
71 of 87
336
35
1

May 3rd, so I'm a party to the case now.

everything to me.

They have to file

Okay.

Service me everything.

And I understand, you know, that process to some

extent, but what does it have to do with this?

it has relevance, I'm all ears.

8
9

A
the NSA.

Okay.

I mean, if

I just don't know.

In 1998 I had a meeting with an agent from

I was complaining again about things, and he told

10

me, he said, listen, Stan.

11

it's the good old boys.

He goes it's not us.

He said

This was in 1998.

12

Now, when Kathleen Kane started in the press,

13

she's been saying that the good old boys are behind her

14

problems.

15

stated for the record what the NSA agent told me about the

16

good old boys and how it relates to what she was saying.

So November 12th I wrote her a letter, and I

17

Uh-huh.

18

She replied back the next day, said she'd keep my

Okay.

19

information on file.

20

month or so ago I'd go up there every two weeks and deliver

21

documents to Strawberry Square to the Attorney General's

22

Office.

Ever since then from November till a

23

Okay.

24

I finally thought, you know what, I'll put screen

25

Tell me about the screen door locks.

door locks on on my screen doors.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page103
35 of 336
71
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page104
72 of 87
336
36
1

Uh-huh.

It didn't stop anything.

They'd work.

Are they still there?

I had to replace one or two of them.

Did you do that yourself?

Oh, yeah.

Do they work now?

Yes.

They'd break them.

They wouldn't work.

Well, supposedly.

I mean, one time they

10

didn't work.

11

Okay.

12

Lowe's.

13

For $30 it looks like?

14

Yeah.

15

Yes.

16

That was within two months ago.

17

Okay.

18
19

Where did you buy the replacements?

Is that what's on there?


Okay.

When did you replace them?

Sleepy's foam mattress.

I'm sorry.

Foam

memory mattress.
A

Here's the situation with that.

On the record,

20

I've been suffering from back pain since '87.

21

say '98 I've been going to the doctors on and off for it.

22

Last year I got a handicapped placard, and in the process I

23

used my medical reports regarding my back.

24

handicapped placard, and I got a long-term placard which

25

means it doesn't renew until 2020.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page104
36 of 336
72
51
87

Since I'd

So I got a

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page105
73 of 87
336
37
1

Okay.

Now, what they were doing is that aside from the

electromagnetic weapons, people were using some type of

device to put under my seats and under my bed that causes

excruciating pain.

6
7

Now, since '05 I was going up and getting laser


treatments to Leola Family Health Clinic in Leola.

Did you say Leola?

Yes.

10

Thank you.

11

Now, the doctor there, the chiropractor, he's the

12

one that signed off on my handicapped placard.

13

Okay.

14

He verified that if they -- they could be using

15

magnets.

16

that's what the Sleepy's is for.

It can throw my back out to cause pain.

17

All right.

18

Now, whether -- I mean, well, go ahead.

19

Have you actually found magnets?

21

No.

22

All right.

24
25

You ask

the questions.

20

23

So

You're not sure where they are within

the mattress?
A

I'm not sure.

No, I'm not.

No.

I'm not sure

how they do it, but they used to do it to my bicycle seat,

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page105
37 of 336
73
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page106
74 of 87
336
38
1

my car seat, my bed.

Other nights...

3
4

Now, some nights I'm fine in the bed.

And you know when they're doing it based upon

when you have the pain?

Yes, it's the only way I know.

Okay.

What's the nature of your back problem?

Herniated disc, do you have a degenerative condition?

No.

Do you have -- I mean, you're going to a

10
11
12

chiropractor.
A

Is he -- is he treating you for anything?

I was getting laser treatments, but it stopped

being effective.

13

Okay.

14

So now the only treatment really is I'm applying

15

to Medicare.

16

house.

17

medicines.

18
19

I'm trying to get a whirlpool bath put in my

I'm trying to get them to pay for that.

Okay.

And pain

And what's the diagnosis other than -- I

mean, are you -- something other than back pain I presume?

20

I have that in here, I believe.

21

I'm going to get myself some more coffee over

22

there.

23

Water would be good.

24

I assume there's water in that pitcher.

25

Would you like any coffee or water?

If not,

I can go out and get you some.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page106
38 of 336
74
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page107
75 of 87
336
39
1

Let me see what document I have right here.

MR. REESER:

(Off the record.)

THE WITNESS:

with me.

BY MR. REESER:

And off the record.

No, I didn't bring my medical file

Okay.

If I know what?

If you know the answer to that question.

10

What was the question?

11

The question was what's the medical diagnosis?

12

Oh, it's a medical term.

13

That's fine.

14
15

That's all right.

I mean, if you know.

I can't.

If you don't -- if you don't know,

that's fine as well.


A

I went to -- okay.

January 29th medical -- Med

16

Express Urgent Care issued me pain medications.

17

they issued me pain medications, all for back.

18

they issued me pain medications.

19

March 23rd
May 10th

In 2009 I was receiving pain medicines from

20

Dr. Sullivan at the Abbeyville Family Clinic on Abbeyille

21

Road for back pain, severe.

22

a walker some nights.

It gets severe.

I have to use

23

I think you said you went to Leola Chiropractic?

24

Yeah, Leola Family Health Clinic.

25

Family Health

Clinic.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page107
39 of 336
75
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page108
76 of 87
336
40
1
2
3
4

That's not a chiropractor.

That's a medical

doctor?
A

No, he's inside there.

It's a -- it's a facility

where they have different doctors.

Okay.

Dr. Newhart, Paul Newhart, he was giving me laser

treatments.

guess it was about laser therapy.

the NFL.

10

I saw an article in the paper in '05 or '06 I


Now they're using it for

But it was effective for a while, and then it

stopped being effective a couple years ago, so I stopped.

11

When did you buy the bed?

12

I bought the bed three months ago.

13

Where did you buy it at?

14

Sleepy's, Manor Shopping Center.

15

Okay.

16

Now, I put the bed on there.

You understand why

17

I put it on there?

18

wouldn't think anything's wrong with it, but I'm putting it

19

on to document just what I'm telling you.

Now, if you went and saw the bed, you

20

Okay.

21

Oh, yeah.

You still use the mattress?


Yeah, because it's a memory foam with

22

a -- it vibrates.

23

the head, the mid-section, and for my back it's great.

It moves in three different positions,

24

Queen size, king size?

25

Full.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page108
40 of 336
76
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page109
77 of 87
336
41
1

Is that smaller than queen?

Yeah, not by much though.

So if you're not having the back issues --

Perfectly normal.

Then it's perfectly -- okay.

Yeah.

All right.

Yeah.

10

Okay.

11

Oh, which ones?

12

How many do you have?

13

How many did I have?

14

And $2,300, is that what you paid for

it?

Laptop computers.

How many are broken?

many's listed on there?

15

There's no number there.

16

Let me see.

17

How

I don't know why those quantities

aren't in there.

18

Yeah.

19

Let me see.

The policy goes -- the policy goes

20

back to '11, so it would have been one, two -- that would

21

be right.

Two.

22

Okay.

23

Two laptops, 400 bucks apiece.

24

right.

25

That's about

What kind of laptops, what brand?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page109
41 of 336
77
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page110
78 of 87
336
42
1

Oh, boy.

HP.

What happened to them?

They just sabotage them.

drives and everything.

usually.

6
7

What was the last one?

Compaq.

They fry the hard

They just fry them.

That's what this document is.

Viruses

It's all in there.

So they've crashed as a result of the viruses?

The hard drives have crashed?

Oh, yeah.

Have you looked into replacing the hard drives?

10

It is -- cost, it's not effective.

Yeah.

It's not --

11

it's not worth it because by the time you pay to do that,

12

it's already outdated technology, so you're going to have

13

an old processor.

14

15

sometimes --

16

You know, it just doesn't --

No, I -- I understand.

The economics of it

So what happened, so in August of last year, the

17

last laptop I replaced, I got a one-year service for Geek

18

Squad.

19

The laptops --

20

Fixing -- fixing the one I have.

21

Okay.

22

I've been in there about 20 times.

These aren't -- the ones that the Geek

Squad's fixing, they're not the HP or the Compaq?

23

Oh, no.

24

Okay.

25

That's a Lenovo I have now.

No.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page110
42 of 336
78
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page111
79 of 87
336
43
1

The HP and the Compaq, how old were those?

Within a year, a year old.

When did they crash?

Well, the last one crashed August of 2015.

one before that was probably -- let's see.

Maybe 2012.

2013.

8
9

Compaq, '15.

Probably two thousand and -- maybe '13.

or to Allstate about the one that crashed in '13 before -A

No.

11

-- last month?

12

No.

13

it in bulk.

It's too time consuming.

14

litigation.

I'm too busy trying to defend myself and

15

everything else, too busy documenting things I have to

16

document.

18

I do -- no, this is the way I do this.

Okay.

I do

I'm too busy with

The next item you have is cost to repair

computers from hacking.

19

Right.

20

Which -- are you talking about the same

21

Maybe

Did you make any report to your insurance agent

10

17

The

computers?

22

Yeah.

23

The --

24

I went to -- I went to other services after Geek

25

Squad was not performing their service effectively.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page111
43 of 336
79
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page112
80 of 87
336
44
1

Let me hold you up for a second now.

We talked

about the HP and the Compaq, and then you said you bought a

warranty in August to have a different computer serviced

by --

A Lenovo.

-- the Geek Squad?

Right.

Denovo?

Lenovo.

10

Lenovo?

11

L-e-n-o-v-o.

12

Is that the one that you're making the claim to

13
14

have repaired?
A

I had that serviced, yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah, I had it

15

done by the people on Harrisburg Pike there.

16

moved, right there at The Grille there, near the campus.

17

forget what his name is.

18

Near F&M you mean?

19

Yeah, The Campus Grille.

He just
I

He had a computer

20

repair shop in there, but he just moved.

21

out to Liberty Place or somewhere.

22

And you paid $400 for that?

23

No.

24

Yeah.

25

Let me see.

I think he moved

That was -- to the repair?

Cost to repair computers from

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page112
44 of 336
80
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page113
81 of 87
336
45
1

hacking.

I guess that's cumulative over the past four

years.

Okay.

That's probably what that is.


Here's what happened.

A Plus on Columbia

Avenue.

Last year I made a formal

complaint to the Lancaster DA's Office.

the detective.

goes you're going to have to do something for me.

going to have to go get a private firm, analyze your

Okay.

I met with

He goes, well, Stan, he goes, listen.

10

computer and get a report.

11

seen the detective since.

He

You're

I did that, paid for it, never

12

Okay.

13

He never returned my calls.

He never -- I guess

14

I called him out on it.

15

wasn't going to do it, or it was going to come back saying

16

there wasn't a virus in it or it wasn't hacked, but he was

17

wrong, so he flew the coop from me.

I guess he thought, you know, I

18

So the $400 is cumulative --

19

Yes.

20

-- for three different computers?

21

Three or four.

22

And this would be over how many years span?

23

Three or four years.

24

Okay.

25

Do you have the bills for any of those

repairs?

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page113
45 of 336
81
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page114
82 of 87
336
46
1

A lot of them are in here.

I'm sorry?

A lot of them are in here.

Okay.

No.

Why not?

You can see them right now.

Oh, sure.

I'm getting tired.

10

I had a long week, so let's

wrap this up.

11

12

items.

13

14

Could you send me copies of them?

I'm about two-thirds of the way through these

Let's make it another day then for the rest.

I've had enough.

15

Okay.

16

We can reschedule another time.

17

And I take it

I'll get a copy of the transcript?

18

I'll get you a copy of the transcript.

19

Great.

20

I would prefer to keep going.

21

No, I can't.

22
23
24
25

You don't mind breaking, do you?

I'm up since 4 o'clock most

mornings, so this is enough for me.


Q

Can you show me where those receipts are that

we've just talked about?


A

Let me see.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page114
46 of 336
82
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page115
83 of 87
336
47
1

Save you and me some time.

Okay.

In the folders that you're looking at right now,

That's $160.

are those copies of your receipts?

5
6

Here's one.

These are the copies of the reports from the

technical people.

Okay.

The Geek Squad was a one-time fee.

A Plus.

Okay.

Here's A Plus.

10

receipt.

11

Avenue.

12

service, the Geek Squad.

13

computer.

14

them where I got them.

Let's see.

Here's

Now I got to find the

This is what they wrote.


Okay.

Okay.

That's on Columbia

Here's my receipt for the tech

Here's my receipt for the actual

Can I have those receipts back?

I want to put

I don't want the stuff mixed up.

15

How can I get a copy of those receipts?

16

Just take them right now and get them.

17

Ask them to copy them, you'd be all right with

19

Sure.

20

Do you have other receipts for any of these other

21

items?

22

I have 30 years of receipts.

23

Here, I mean here in this building.

18

24
25

that?
Sure.

Do you have

them with you?


A

I don't know.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page115
47 of 336
83
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page116
84 of 87
336
48
1

Could you -- there was another one in there that

I was looking at.

piece of paper.

It was on an 11 -- 8 and a half by 11

Here, that was $160.

Let's see.

Let me go

through there quick and see if I can get the receipts.

Here's a receipt.

they changed my SIM card thinking that would stop the

hacking, but it didn't.

for -- that's just an in-take.

This is a Verizon.

This is a receipt, but it's not


These are the IC3 reports.

10

Let's see if the receipt's in here.

11

they're all the receipts I have.

12

Okay.

13

I believe.

14

What Verizon did was

Geek Squad.

No,

I mean, as far as the computers are

concerned.

15

And then there's no receipts in these documents?

16

Receipts for what?

17

Any of these items that we're talking about.

18

I don't know.

19

Okay.

20

I don't know.

21

I'll make copies of these.

22

I did not peruse all these files for receipts.

23

Would you like -- would you like me to make a

24
25

copy of that for your records?


A

No, I gave it to you.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page116
48 of 336
84
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page117
85 of 87
336
49
1

Okay.

I'm going to have to trust you.

changing documents on me all the time.

(Off the record.)

I got people

BY MR. REESER:

Okay.

Do you want to take these and copy them and bring

them back?

Or I can mail them back to you.

10

Well, aren't we going to continue this?

11

Actually what I have to do is I have to report

Sure.

12

back to Allstate, and they let me know if they want me to

13

continue it or not.

14
15

A
fine.

Okay.

You can take them then.

Mail them back.

16

Okay.

17

You're going to get educated.

18
19
20

Yeah, that'd be

And you will not -You're going to be

a changed man, trust me.


Q

You will not do the continuation, assuming we

have one, in the courthouse?

21

Why?

22

Because it's free.

23

Why don't we do it at Allstate's office, Allen's

24
25

office?
Q

Okay.

I'll see if I can arrange that.

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page117
49 of 336
85
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page118
86 of 87
336
50
1

Or we can do it at my house.

1250 Freemont Street.

It's nice.

You can come to

It's nice there.

It's fixed up.

I have no problem with that.

All right.

I had enough of that courthouse.

Okay.

How long did this last?

Roughly an hour.

So it's about 20 after 10:00 roughly.

I don't know what time we

started.

10

That's pretty good.

11

So you want to adjourn for the day?

12

Yeah.

13

MR. REESER:

14

(The examination under oath was adjourned at

15

Okay.

Very good.

10:19 a.m.)

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page118
50 of 336
86
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
87 Filed
Filed07/12/16
07/12/16 Page
Page119
87 of 87
336
51
1

COUNTY OF DAUPHIN

2
3
4

:
: SS

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

I, Diane F. Foltz, a Notary Public, authorized to

administer oaths within and for the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the

testimony of Stanley J. Caterbone.

8
9

I further certify that before the taking of said


statement, the witness was duly sworn; that the questions

10

and answers were taken down stenographically by the said

11

Reporter-Notary Public, and afterwards reduced to

12

typewriting under the direction of the said Reporter.

13
14
15

I further certify the said statement was taken at the


time and place specified in the caption sheet hereof.
I further certify I am not a relative or employee or

16

attorney or counsel to any of the parties, or a relative or

17

employee of such attorney or counsel, or financially

18

interested directly or indirectly in this action.

19

I further certify that the said statement

20

constitutes a true record of the testimony given by the

21

said witness.

22
23
24
25

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand


this 13th day of June, 2016.
_______________________
Diane F. Foltz, RMR
Notary Public

Stan J. Caterbone
16-05815
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
EXHIBITUnder
Allstate
Oath
Amicus
Testimony
for Kathleen KanePage
Page119
51 of 336
87
51
87

Tuesday July
June12,
9, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
120
1 of
of39
336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
June 22, 2016

THEY WANT TO KILL ME

GANG STALKING IN AMERICA


Death by a 1000 Cuts
__________________________________________________
Everyone has either personally experienced or witnessed someone else experience a
dog straining against its leash to the point where the dog is essentially taking its owner for a walk,
rather than the other way around.
Currently, America is the dog owner, and the dog taking us for a walk is the government-industrial
complex of intelligence and law enforcement agencies (the DOJ, FBI, DHS, CIA, NSA, etc.), the
Pentagon, local law enforcement agencies, and the corporate partners of those entities the
military and security contractors such as Lockheed-Martin, Pinkerton Security (now Securitas),
and Blackwater (now Puppies and Rainbows, Inc. or whatever theyre calling themselves these
days).
The dog is leading the way and dictating the pace. People familiar with gang stalking or for
that matter drone assassinations might say that the dog has slipped its leash altogether. Or to
use the taxonomy of George Orwells Animal Farm, the pigs and the dogs have formed a profitable
unholy alliance which is now almost impossible to rein in, because at the top, things are done in
secret (for national security reasons) and because jurisdictional and public-private boundaries
have been largely erased.
More than half of the employees of the NSA, for example one of seventeen intelligence agencies
are private contractors. Spying on Americans and incarcerating them are lucrative
businesses, and the privatization of such activities helps the government escape liability for
abuses of power.
In June 2013 Democracy Now! interviewed Christopher Pyle, a former military instructor who
exposed the monitoring of millions of Americans by the CIA and the Army in the 1970s and who
became the target of a smear campaign to discredit him as a result. He was asked about the NSA
PRISM scandal revealed by whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
CHRISTOPHER PYLE: Its important to note that the vice chairman of Booz Allen happens to be
Mike McConnell, who was former director of NSA and of national intelligence. There is a revolving
door between high government positions and private corporations, and this revolving door allows
these people to make a great deal more money upon leaving the government, and then being
rented back to the government in a contractor capacity. And thats part of the corruption of the
system.
JUAN GONZLEZ: Now, one of the things youve also said is that the top-secret designation is a
way tois more of a way for the government officials, the bureaucrats and the contractors not to

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
120
52
1 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
121
2 of
of39
336

be held accountable than it is to actually protect secrets that the government needs to protect.
Could you expand on that?
CHRISTOPHER PYLE: Well, yes. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects us
from unreasonable searches and seizures, only binds the government, doesnt bind corporations.
Thats a serious problem. The reason we have privatization of prisons, in some ways, is for
governments to escape liability. They put the liability on the private corporations that run the
prisons, and they just charge their liabilities as an operating cost.
Presidents, most members of Congress, and the Department of Justice overwhelmingly defer to
the will of U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies and the Pentagon rather than, for
example, civil libertarians and peace activists, because thats the easiest course for them
politically. The same dynamic is at work on the local level, where it is almost always easier for
mayors and city council members and the local news media to reflexively side with the police.
Americas military, police, and intelligence expenditures and its incarceration rates dwarf those
of other countries. The city of New York reportedly has a thousand police officers assigned to work
exclusively on counterterrorism duties. That massive security infrastructure might be less
disturbing if Americans trusted their government. That is not the case though.
A Rasmussen Reports poll published in April 2014 found that more than twice as many American
voters regarded the federal government as a threat to their rights than those who viewed the
federal government as a protector of their rights.
Much of the abuse of power by Americas government has been rationalized by the need to
support The War on Drugs and The War on Terrorism, although the moral and practical
assumptions of those campaigns are constantly disproved.
In addition to being inherently violative of individual liberties, the drug war has been a massive
failure since its implementation by President Nixon (for the same obvious reasons that alcohol
prohibition was a disastrous policy). The policy is sustained by inertia, self-righteous hypocrisy,
ignorance, and the political influence of the parasitic entities which profit from it, such as the Drug
Enforcement Agency, and the incarceration industry.
In addition to the enormous social and financial costs, prohibition has had a corrosive effect on the
moral integrity of the nations police agencies. Police corruption cases involving drugs are so
common that the anti-prohibition organization StopTheDrugWar.Org publishes a weekly review of
drug-related crimes by police officers, and the group never runs out of news.
As with supporters of the drug war, apologists and opportunists who unconditionally support the
strategies and tactics of the War on Terrorism rarely acknowledge either the associated
diminution of civil liberties or the blow-back generated by the U.S. governments tendency to
throw its weight around as argued by people such as Michael Scheuer, Glenn Greenwald, Noam
Chomsky, Ron Paul, William Blum, and others. Critics are usually marginalized by the two major
political parties and by the establishment news media for daring to even question the
governments strategies and tactics.
Americas Founders would be horrified at the extent to which we have become a nation of sheep.
We routinely surrender our rights to authority figures in the name of security. The common
assumption is that Americans should assent to whatever the government demands rather than
having the government answer to the people. Americans need to reassert control over their
government; we need to train the dog to heel.
Part of the cultural problem then is that we have become docile. The other closely-related problem
is ignorance. Americans are shockingly uninformed of the activities of their government. A March
2011 Newsweek poll found that 73 percent didnt know why we fought the Cold War, and 29
percent couldnt even name the vice president. Perhaps most disturbing, 44 percent were unable
to define the Bill of Rights.
Naturally, even fewer Americans are familiar with scandals such as Operation Mockingbird, the
Pentagon Papers, Cointelpro, and MK Ultra. No one could possibly assess the plausibility of the

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
121
53
2 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
122
3 of
of39
336

reports of the counterintelligence abuses sometimes referred to as gang stalking without a


background knowledge of such examples of extreme corruption.
A passive and ignorant population is ideal for counterintelligence operations. The public is more
easily deceived, and there is a deep supply of potential snitches and perps for Stasi-style bullying
of dissidents and others.
Gang stalking (Cointelpro Version 2.0) is one of the extreme manifestations of Americas
tendency toward militarism and police state governance along with drone assassinations,
warrantless surveillance of email, the Justice Departments aggressive prosecution of whistleblowers, and countless other outrages against the U.S. Constitution.
What is happening is a modern version of the FBIs infamous Cointelpro operations. Naturally, the
tactics and disinformation are more sophisticated than that of the original program. Human
nature, on the other hand, has not changed a bit. When the activists who exposed the original
Cointelpro in 1971 finally revealed their identities in January 2014, one of them, Keith Forsyth,
explained why they felt the break-in was necessary:e
Counterintelligence activities are inherently difficult to explain to the public. They are not
impossible to explain however. Advancements in digital technology have enabled elements of the
government and their corporate cronies to engage in high-tech spying, lying, and harassment, but
they have also enabled the public to uncover what the neo-fascist rodents are up to.
Already the digital public square is filled with information and rhetoric which the government
would prefer to censor, but cannot, posted by Americans fed-up with the corruption, secrecy, and
abuses of power in the upper echelons of government and corporations. Even the federal
governments massive self-serving security apparatus and its abettors in mainstream corporate
media institutions cannot effectively monitor and control the flow of information anymore.
Dissent is harder to marginalize and censor in a digital landscape filled with whistle-blowers,
citizen-journalists, bloggers, and alternative media websites (from all across the ideological
spectrum).
Information outlets such as WikiLeaks, movements such as Anonymous, and whistle-blowers such
as Edward Snowden, have created a flow of uncensored critical information. Citizens no longer
have to wait for the New York Times to expose the next Pentagon Papers conspiracy or for the
Washington Post to expose the next Watergate scandal.
Individuals who are targets of Cointelpro-type operations (gang stalking) need to challenge the
rodents in our nations food chain, and support political reformers progressives, libertarians, and
others who defend the individual liberties of Americans against the predatory inclinations of
powerful government agencies and private corporations. Do not let America mutate any further
into a police state; it is time to push back.
__________________________________________________________
Police officials who share my views about the militarization of
law enforcement agencies
Norm Stamper, former police chief of Seattle, is an example of a cop who understands that police
in America are being used as pawns in a corrupt system of government. That analysis does not
excuse the crimes of individual bad cops, but it provides the necessary context for understanding
that even good cops are often required to function as elements of an illegitimate machine.
Here are some quotes from Stamper from a 2011 interview on Democracy Now!
There are many compassionate, decent, competent police officers who do a terrific job day in
and day out. There are others who are, quote, bad apples. What both of them have in common
is that they occupy, as it were, a system, a structure that itself is rotten. And I am talking about
the paramilitary bureaucracy.
I think the drug war, which has put police officers against young people and poor people and

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
122
54
3 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
123
4 of
of39
336

people of color, the war on terrorism, the domestic dimensions of that war, have all served to
increase the militarization of Americas police forces.
I might even add to that mix the increased privatization of the prison industry in the United
States, where people are in fact making huge sums of money on the backs of those arrested for
nonviolent drug offenses.
Radley Balko, author of Rise of the Warrior Cop, is another important voice on this issue. He has a
blog called The Agitator which is a critique of the militarization of American police agencies. Here
are some comments by police officers who agree with him.
__________________________________________________________
Exposure of corrupt and abusive policing
Police
e
St
This excellent website features aggregated news stories and commentary about police brutality,
the militarization of law enforcement agencies, corruption, bad policies, and civil rights violations.
Click on image to enlarge

Riot police at the 2008 Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota. Photograph by
Brendan Scherer
__________________________________________________________
The Boot Boys of the One Percent
People with power and wealth have always exploited the abundance of bullies in the law
enforcement industry by using them as pawns to serve their agendas.
Activist Jeremy Hammond is currently serving a ten-year prison sentence for hacking the emails of
private intelligence-security firms such as Stratfor and HBGary and exposing their role as
counterintelligence goons for corporations. Hammond said that he views most American law
enforcement personnel as the boot boys of the one percent. I could not agree more.
Clearly there are exceptions. It would be dishonest and simplistic to characterize everyone who
wears a badge or works in the private security industry as a thug. On the other hand, as one
becomes familiar with the evidence that organized stalking is widespread, it becomes apparent

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
123
55
4 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
124
5 of
of39
336

that even the law enforcement personnel who do not directly participate in gang stalking are
guilty of maintaining a cowardly silence about such crimes.
In the FBI (Americas primary counterintelligence agency), that code of silence is maintained both
by the culture of the organization and by official policies for example, the agencys exemption
from the Whistleblower Protection Act.
In the Patriot Act era in which we live, information is shared extensively among federal and local
law enforcement agencies. One of the implications of this is that your local police department
officers must know damn well that gang stalking is used as a Stasi-type weapon for controlling
individuals deemed to be excessively independent-minded or to be a potential problem for the
corporate clients of the FBI.
A negative inference about the moral character of most police officials is unavoidable.
Under American laws, when the government has legal evidence that someone is a criminal, he or
she is investigated, arrested and prosecuted. If however, certain government officials or certain
crony corporate clients of the government wish to suppress and terrorize someone for personal
or political reasons, they can target the person with illegal and secret extra-judicial punishment,
just as the communists did in East Germany, and just as the neo-fascist criminals in the FBI did
during the Cointelpro era.
Cops know this, and they remain silent about it. Americas law enforcement industry needs fewer
people like J. Edgar Hoover, and more people like Frank Serpico.
__________________________________________________________
Gore Vidal on Americas Police Agencies
The great essayist Gore Vidal sometimes wrote about the character of American law enforcement
agencies. The following is an excerpt from his 2009 essay America
Se.
Every municipality is complaining about local police forces run wild. And no one does anything
about it. And our masters are armed to the teeth and would seem more likely to fire at us instead
of at the troublemakers. I cant think of any civilized country that would allow this, from the look
of these bulky guardians of the peace, to whom no right-minded person would allow even a
slingshot to be given.
So, we are a weirdly militarized citizenry governed by the worst elements in the United States,
and something is bound to blow up, as I have felt for some time now. In my wanderings around
the U.S., I talk to people without money, without power, ordinary voters, as well as nowadays,
people maimed by war, or time, or life or whatever, and I am convinced more and more that this
is a vicious country in which the police are allowed to run amok, absolutely independent of
anyone, and that is why from time to time they are allowed to get away with murder. One
surprisingly knew that a wrinkle has been discovered in the seamless surface of our troubled
state. Policemen are seldom tried for their crimes, or indeed, held responsible for what they do,
which disturbs the peace and causes distress among the orderly.
I would suggest that the president, if he wants to be usefuland not many presidents do in my
experiencehe might as well call together a commission in response to citizens of every major
municipality in the United States who are complaining to central authority about police forces out
of control. And no one dares do anything because the police will say, Well, you know they are
acting like this because they are bad people who hate us because we are good people, rescuing
cats from trees and otherwise loved by every decent person in the land.
What the police in their ignorance have not figured out is that they have lost all credibility since
World War II. They are sort of parasites on the fringe of society and do no particular good for
anyone except possibly themselves.
A minute of Gore Vidal comments about the idiocy of undermining the Bill of Rights with the
Patriot Act.

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
124
56
5 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
125
6 of
of39
336

__________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________
If you can help expose illegal spying and harassment of Americans by intelligence agencies, law
enforcement agencies, and private security contractors, please do so. America needs more
patriots like Daniel Ellsberg, Edward Snowden, Jeremy Hammond, Barrett Brown, Russell Tice,
William Binney, Ray McGovern, Thomas Drake, Frank Serpico, Thomas Tamm, Hugh Thompson,
Jr., William C. Davidon, John Raines, Bonnie Raines, Keith Forsyth, Judi Feingold, and Bob
Williamson.

__________________________________________________________
FightGangStalking.com

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
125
57
6 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case
Case
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJDocument
Document
8970Filed
Filed
07/12/16
06/22/16Page
Page
126
7 of
of39
336

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163

Gang StalkingFamily
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
in America
U.S.Amicus
Mind
Declaration
Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
126
58
7 of
of 453
39
336

Tuesday
Tuesday
June
July
July12,
22,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 127 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
127
52
91
111of
1of
of
1of
of
51
51
of
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
17,
15,
12,
5, 2016
2015

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 128 of 336


scaterbone@live.com

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163

PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
128
53
92
222
1of
2of
of
2of
of
151
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 129 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
129
54
93
333
2of
3of
of
3of
of
51
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 130 of 336

Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246

District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664

May 21, 2009


To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
130
55
94
444
3of
4of
of
4of
of
51
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 131 of 336


Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
131
56
95
555
4of
5of
of
5of
of
251
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 132 of 336


For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
132
57
96
666
5of
6of
of
6of
of
351
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 133 of 336


(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon


Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
133
58
97
777
6of
7of
of
7of
of
451
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 134 of 336


mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
134
59
98
888
7of
8of
of
8of
of
551
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 135 of 336

Richmond council passes resolution


supporting ban on space-based
weapons

May 20, 2015


FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
135
60
99
999
8of
9of
of
9of
of
851
51
of
50
51
414
453
336
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 136 of 336

dumb ideas, Bates said.


Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based


weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments

1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!


Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
100
136
10
61
10
10
910
10
of
of
of
9of
51
51
of
50
414
51
336
453
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 137 of 336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
101
137
11
62
11
10
11
11
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
111
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 138 of 336


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009

Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated:

October 10, 2015

Date Completed:
Date Initiated:

July 28, 2009


July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
102
138
12
63
12
11
12
12
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
212
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 139 of 336


UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.

From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.

The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.

By

the

end

of

the

summer

of

2010

every

social

media

site,

including

the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and


coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.

And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.

Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.

The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle


Lambert.

In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate


murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
103
139
13
64
13
12
13
13
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
313
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 140 of 336


Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.

However, this time there was

no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.

The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.

The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.

The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
104
140
14
65
14
13
14
14
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
414
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 141 of 336


In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.

In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.

Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.

Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
105
141
15
66
15
14
15
15
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
515
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 142 of 336


HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.

After discussions with ISC and United

Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.

However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.

This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.

Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.

This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.

ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

INTERNATIONAL

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
106
142
16
67
16
15
16
16
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
616
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 143 of 336


The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the


Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James


Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
107
143
17
68
17
16
17
17
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
717
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 144 of 336


In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP


Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.

Information and findings are still being

Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.


Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
108
144
18
69
18
17
18
18
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
818
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 145 of 336


Change the history of events and the truth.
THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.

During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.

This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
109
145
19
70
19
18
19
19
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
919
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 146 of 336


REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND
WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.

Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way

without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.

This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.

See attached documents for

more information.

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
110
146
20
71
20
19
20
20
20
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
10
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 147 of 336


FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.

He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke


and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.

Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
111
147
21
72
21
20
21
21
21
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
11
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 148 of 336


The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:

Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.

He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.

His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.

The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.

However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.

On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.

The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.

He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,

former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
112
148
22
73
22
21
22
22
22
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
12
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 149 of 336


about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.

Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.

By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.

Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School.

After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.

While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.

It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.

The

The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.

Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.

Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.

John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
113
149
23
74
23
22
23
23
23
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
13
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 150 of 336


Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.

Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.

Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..

Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.

The same was true of his businesses.

Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.

There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;

every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
114
150
24
75
24
23
24
24
24
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
14
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 151 of 336


pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.

THE PUBLIC RECORD


The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.

There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare


and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.

For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.

For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:


www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
115
151
25
76
25
24
25
25
25
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
15
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 152 of 336


DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW
** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.

This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season.

On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

Dated: July 28, 2009


Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
116
152
26
77
26
25
26
26
26
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
16
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 153 of 336


September 7, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
117
153
27
78
27
26
27
27
27
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
17
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 154 of 336


Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
118
154
28
79
28
27
28
28
28
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
18
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 155 of 336


"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.

Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
119
155
29
80
29
28
29
29
29
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
19
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 156 of 336

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
120
156
30
81
30
29
30
30
30
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
20
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 157 of 336


AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.

The

whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
121
157
31
82
31
21
30
31
31
31
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
41
50
51
336
453
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
October
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
10,
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 158 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
122
158
32
83
32
31
32
32
32
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 159 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
123
159
33
84
33
32
33
33
33
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 160 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
124
160
34
85
34
33
34
34
34
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 161 of 336

scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST


STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of


2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
125
161
35
86
35
35
35
35
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
414
51
336
453
51
51

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
17,
15,
12,
5, 2016
2015

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 162 of 336

14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice


15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Northwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
27.Southeast Medical Facilities and Brightside Church Office, February 2016, Would not
issue pain medication and filed a Private Criminal Complaint with the Lancaster County
District Attorney, no opinion as of yet.
$ U.S. Federal Facilities per the National Security Agency Interrogation of March 9, 2016
at the NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. Handcuffed and Interrogated for over an
hour and finally let go and told not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And said I was no
longer permitted to visit any U.S. Federal Facilities.

Dated: March 15, 2016

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Caterbone
Family
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
126
162
36
87
36
3636
of
of
of51
51
of
414
51
336
453
51

Tuesday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
15,
12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 163 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
127
163
37
88
37
36
37
37
37
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
27
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 164 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
128
164
38
89
38
37
38
38
38
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
28
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 165 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
129
165
39
90
39
38
39
39
39
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
29
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 166 of 336

! "

"

$% &
!

" #

%
"&#
(

'
!

(
,

"

"

")

"

""
-

)
!
! "
!

'
%

" !
"

!
)

+
!

" *
"

"
,

,
,

*
%

*
(

%
!
/"0

1
1 ,
"
"

4
!

"

"
!

!
#
.

.
&,,0
%

1 ,

2"3

!
)

** ! "
&,,..$/

&,,

%
&,,
%

&

, "

"

00

"

!,

"

6
7

7 , !
&,,-

8,
:
(

$;$

"2

! " ,

, ,

** !

;
5

$
!

&,,@

,
.

&<;=

>
1

9
,

&,,=
$

,
>
A

1 B3

.+

&,,=
1 B3

2
>
%

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
130
166
40
91
40
39
40
40
40
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
30
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 167 of 336


<

1
1

* "
!

"
C#

"$

"

<
*

&, ,

24

#9

; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%

&,,0 4
! %3

"

"

!
&,,
%

!
4

'
5

4
D

%
%

"

""

,! "
0 =

0 =9

9
00&9 00

:
9

&,,-

&, , $
!

%
!
D

%
%

=
F
!

))
+

/4

),

"

0 =

/
$

G
3

%
00

3
3

"

%#
$

$
&, ,

&,,4

!- "

.
&,,@

,
*

&,,<
E

&,,

-) !
/ 4

24
/

$
D

&, ,
D

$
&,,-

&,,0

%
D

!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D

$
A
8F
$

%
;

D
.

%
&,,3
E
$

*
00=; 00

$
5

! 7

0 =
00

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
131
167
41
92
41
40
41
41
41
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
31
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 168 of 336

)
A

24
$;$

00
(F

&

%
B

5
00 9

" * <
00=( 00 9

:#

> ) "" ""


$

;3

#, " !
&,,-

"

"

"

0 =
&, ,

/
.
$

B
3

3
=

0 =

) "

.
&,,1

0 =

24

" "
3

"
&,,@

" E

""

B
$

<

&,,1

.
&,,-

,-(&&
2

=
@,

"

&,
3

&,,!

&,,@

&,,@

0 =
@, 1

&,,@
9
!
@,

#" !,
0 =

" "1 ,

"

"*

":

" E
F

&,,-

!
B

/
!

"

00=( 00 9
B
:
9

$
'

.
&,,1
9

0 =
&, ,

/
.

00 9

/
&,,9

&,

( "

!
.

00

$
!

&, ,
F

3
7

8
!

&,,

&, ,

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
132
168
42
93
42
41
42
42
42
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
32
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 169 of 336


&

, * "

&&

*#
"

&:

;!

&<

:
%

$
&, ,

$
&,,-

!-

,
5
%

"

>

$
$

< !-

24

? "
;

>

&,,0
B

&,,%
(

$
&, ,

&-

A
.+ $

&@

! :

&,,$

: , *

&, ,

* @

&,,@

"
E

3
&,,

"

&,,0

7 "!

7 "
0 =
*

&=

) "

":

)"

&,,@
"

&

&0

!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,

00

:,

!6

"

"

" .
9 &,,0

0 = "&#

, *

&,,@
/

" F
0 =

;A

0 =
F

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
133
169
43
94
43
42
43
43
43
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
33
of
41

0 =

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 170 of 336


!

3
"

$
+

$
.

0 =

I $
!

0 =

.
$

"2

'

+$;F
D
"$

&,;&,
3
A

00

'
$ 24

"1E1# $

K
E
A

00&

>

L
F

F
B

F
+

0=,K
A

$
$

1
+

>

1
$
>

B
!

3
F

1
00
) % 3
&,,-

!
>

! A !

00,K
1 B3
>

F
F
& 1

F
8

! 4

'
A

! 4

A
0=,K

F
00,K

0 ,K

0<,K

3
/

>

%
&,,

) %$

0@,K
0@,K
$

2!
A

D 1

"
$

0 <9 F

4
A? D!B
#
*

$
7

+
00

D 18

.
E

$
M 1
00= E

0 =
%

0 ,K
$

0 =

M
00
!

&,,9

(
9

!
1

,-(

$ !2B+EF2

(&&

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
134
170
44
95
44
43
44
44
44
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
34
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 171 of 336


#

") !

"

7!

N
.
!
5
F

(
(

5
G
*

A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!

,
B

A
" " * #" !, " "

$C

* #" !, D

73

8
* 7

,
"

"

&

"
#

.
"

#(

5
7
9

'
5

%
7A

8 !

8 !

'

!
7D .2

O
% 8

'
7

'

(
(

%
%

4
K
K

M %

%
K
'

7E

(
8

"

%
'

%(

(
(

4
;

(
7
7

87

(
(

8
8

- 7 > !,

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
135
171
45
96
45
44
45
45
45
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
35
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 172 of 336


!

* , "
!

B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B

@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD

B@
)
B@

DD
!
!

))

1"

)
*
!
")

1
3
1

"

)
)

, "

*"

"
, "

!
*

"

")

"

7
"!

"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "

*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !

)
*

"E

DD

")

E DD
%

,
!

!"

, "

"

"

"

1 ,"

DD

*)

PPPPPPP "

>7

%#

'?

Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

"

Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

"

June 19, 2015


PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP

15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98


PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.

I
&, ,

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
136
172
46
97
46
45
46
46
46
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
36
of
41

Don't Know When

24

$
$

Q &, , "!
I

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 173 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
137
173
47
98
47
46
47
47
47
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
37
of
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 35 of 41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 174 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
138
174
48
99
48
47
48
48
48
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
414
50
51
336
453
51
51
Page
38
of
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 36 of 41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 175 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
100
139
175
49
49
48
49
49
49
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
336
414
453
51
51
Page
39
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 176 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
101
140
176
50
50
49
50
50
50
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
336
414
453
51
51
Page
40
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 177 of 336

Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Amicus
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
for
Summary
Kathleen KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
102
141
177
51
51
50
51
51
51
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
336
414
453
51
51
Page
41
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Tuesday
March
December
15,
March
2016
July
15,
3/15/2016
July
2016
11,
17,
15,
12,
5, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 178 of 336

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen KanePage
Page 142
103
178 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 179 of 336

Julianne McKinney: Letter to President Clinton and His Reply

Association of ational Security Alumni


Electronic Surveillance Project
P.O. Box 13625
Silver Spring, MD 20911/3625
(301) 608/0143
[no longer in service]

"

# $$
(

!%
#!!

(0
!1
! (
'

#
+

!
$
(%

<

!9 $ 9
9 $ 9

#
, $
! (

%
'
/

!%

+
!! !
'

&

( ?%
'
$$
%
%
9+
9

$
(

(
%

+
%

'
: '
92 6
(
8 !

((
(
'

4$
6

'

!
!
!
9

)
%
.'/
!! ' $

$
(
(
( !
9
1
(

(
9
'

26
9

%
%(
: !
<#)
%
4

'
!!

!
%*

!
+

3)
=

%
<#)
+

4$
4

% (

%
90

&

$%
!

/
<#)

!& '

0<#) 2
/
>
!

,
(
4$
4$

(3)

#
'

% $$

% 8
'

!
%

!
' !$

'
1

!!
'

%
(

* ( ' '
18 09
!
3
!)
9
(
9( ;
% 08 !
+
! 4$
(
#

$
!

'
6((
'

!9
1
9( ;

1
!
' '

5
#

!
!( %

! ! $$
%
'
'
* ! +
%1
!2
,
% %
.
!
4$
+
!

$$
!

% 9+
9+
9 +
9'

((
2
91
90(
%9

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
104
143
179
1 of
of10
336
414
453

9!
'
$
(

!
7

!
%
%
4$
$
! %
%
! 4$
%
&

(
2
.
)

%
%

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 180 of 336

((

#
' !
' !
%
' !! + !
!'
%9
$ !
%
! $
!

$ !
( !
%
(
4$

!
$

! $

!
*+

(
%
!
$
9

!'

!1
! (
%91

((
4$
'
!

%1

# +
+
! (

0$
! $$
$ %

%1!

+
(
!

$
$$

$
+

$
'

#(

# !
%

! #
4$

'

! $

!
&
1

!
%$
)
/

'

%$

'

!(
! #!

!
%

%6
!

!'
+

( !
!

% (

,
(( (

(
!

(
+

(
+

%
%
9

$ +
! $$
!
'
%
3)
/
+
% !

$ #

*%!
'

6
(
+

(9

%
*

%
(

(
'

%(

'

!
! -'

!
!
(3)

,
$

(
!
/

+
+

+
!
$

'
$

% !

$
*
(

4$
)
@A

%
)

!@

3-#6&&B C D#&&B5
B

'

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
105
144
180
2 of
of10
336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 181 of 336

THE WHITE HOUSE


WASHI GTO

C D

B
6
) '

)
(&
? 4
C

A((
)$

=
%

'
)

,
%6

1 =

"
# $$
#

'
4$
'
$
(

*
&

)
%
'

$
%

((
(

'

!#+

$
%
%

# $$
)

!%
!!

$
4$
!

*
+

(
!

*%

(
!

*
+
%

!
+

'
9+
' '
%
'

% #

%
$

!
(
# (
%

(
,

%
"F ?

C <

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
106
145
181
3 of
of10
336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016

" #

&

8==

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 182 of 336

!
" " #
$

&
&

&
(
( ) * + ,-./
"0 .1
2,-./

&

'

3
4
5
&
3
5
,!1 0 6
&
)
*
7
0 3 .1/ 1
8" 3
&

89

" #

&

#
:

'+

29

8
<

2 +

%
+
+

+
&
+

<

<
<

0
2

'

4
+

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
107
146
182
4 of
of10
336
414
453
!

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016
.=

=.11

8!, "

" #

&

8==

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 183 of 336

6
2

(
>
2
9
11 ? &

2
9

>

2
"

"

23

'+
&

(
9

+
0

2 +

@0

< $

4
0

9
(
>

>

2
220 02

4
22

2
> < >

6
5

8
*

?& 5

>

>

?&
C
. *

?& 5
>
2
>
?&

, 7
+

'

2
2
C

(
2

! :

.
C

3
2

/ 7

- 7
2

$
>

A
2

22 ,12
>

22

0
>

C
&
2

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
108
147
183
5 of
of10
336
414
453
!

'

2
?&
>
D

%
$

2A

2
&
Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016
.=

=.11

8!, "

" #

&

8==

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 184 of 336

E 7

'
>

>
C

F 7

>

>

2
3
+

1 7
5
7

0
'

0
$

6 57'$%

0 0

)
?&
G

>

>

>

. 7
G
+
! 7

?&

3
C

/ 7
+
- &

?&
C
"

&

(
D
D

0
$

" #
+

3
6

22
>

>

" +

<
9
>

>

3
Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
109
148
184
6 of
of10
336
414
453
!

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016
.=

=.11

8!, "

" #

&

8==

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 185 of 336

?& 3

22

&

< 3

22

<
(
&
4?A9 $$' "3#9$$'H
0

'

&

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
110
149
185
7 of
of10
336
414
453
!

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016
.=

=.11

8!, "

" '(

!""#$ $%&""

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 186 of 336

'

( #
0

0 1 2 0

-## 0

) )' )

0 '

"" #

36 -

$ %

&

9
+

0 ! 3 0

7 0

- % )

0 - (

# )

#
#

'

))

'(
(
( (
)
(

&

!
+
-

$ %

&

)
++

+ (

(
++

/$
+

*
( /$

++

*
*

. +
*
+0
!

+
+

+
( #

$
)
- --

+ (

! -

1221
!
(

.
+ (

&

)(

( + (
!( (

) .
!
!

(
!
* (
) (

)-

( & (
+
( + ( ! !
) ) (

,
)
- !
& (

4 4

,
(

(
(

( (
)
) ,
(
+ ( ! !
&
*

*
*
#

/$',.

.*
)-

)
(
!!
!

&-

0 $
.
6

. "" ( !566

1,

- (

,(
+

!!
( ! )
%
3 (

&

++

(
,

"

$ %

"" ( !566
&7

"" ( !566

,
,

6
)

& 6

! %,(

"
% 9

4!

;
!

$!
#
( &
9
;
:

<

$
+

"

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page
111
150
186
8 of
of10
336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016
"( "" ())# " * +

MSN Hotmail - Printable Month View

http://calendar.msn.com/calendar/isapi.dll?calendarView=printIndex

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 187 of 336

amgroup01@msn.com

Printed: Monday Aug. 1, 2005, 11:44 AM

July 2005
Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

27

28

12:00
PM Chamber
Picnic $75.00
display for banner

11:00 AM Victory
One HUD (119th &
5t...)
12:00 PM Central
Park
Conservato... (Across
fro...)

Thursday

Friday

29

30

Saturday

Sunday

1
12:00 PM Chapter
11 (Reading)

2
6:00 AM LIVE 8 (Global)

9:00 AM Live8
3:00 PM Canceled Zooma Concerts (Philadelph...)
Tour-Tre... (Hershey St...)

3
11:00
AM Scout's
Trail (Kennet,
MO)

5:00 PM Chapter 11 (DOJ


fax)

3:00 PM C.
Rice (New York, ...)

7:00 PM Earth,
Wind &
Fire/Chic... (Star
Pavil...)

6:00 AM LIZZY
12:00 AM G8
BDAY (EVERYWHERE...) Summit (Edinbo...)

12:00 AM G8
Summit (Edinbo...)

9:00 AM G8
Summit (Edinbo...)

10:00 AM Nettwerk
Management (California)

8:45 AM London
Blasts (4 sites)

10

8:00
9:00
PM Quitent (Springhous...) AM Honda
Grace Period
Payment Due

2:00 PM Maddonna
EMAIL SC
"SECU... (email)
5:00 PM Cross Gates
Altercation (Cross
Gate...)

11

12

13

9:00 AM Fremont
Street
Suit (Cheryl
Har...)

11:00 AM Judgement
For Me against 1250
Fremont St...
3:00 PM Nevin Cooley

10:00 AM Charlie
Smthgall (Moyo's
Off...)

9:00
PM pp (014512429)

14

15

16

11:00 AM Tait
Towers (Lititz pa)

17
11:00 AM Dell
&
Crow (forum)

11:30 AM Gene
Pellan (Clair Brot...)

10:00 AM Art
Ward (Mayor
Smit...)
11:00 AM Nevic
Cooley (High
Offic...)
11:00 AM Tim
Swartz (Swartz
Off...)

18
7:00 PM John
Couger/John
Fogert... (Hershey
St...)

25
10:00 AM filed
brief (kennett,
M...)

19
12:00 PM Discover
Credit Card

20
1:00 PM MBNA AAA
Credit Card

2:00 PM Department 1:00 PM Fax to


of
Department of
Justice (Philadelph...) Ju... (Philadelph...)
6:30 PM 3 Doors
Down/Stand (Hershey
Gi...)
9:00 PM CALL TO FBI
PITTS OFFICE 2:00AM
NS ISSUE...

26
6:00 PM arrive in
Austin

27
1:00 PM Army
Intelligence
Inter... (Austin Nat...)
8:00 PM Bowling for

21
8:00 AM LONDON
BOMB BLASTS 4
LOCALS
9:00 AM Honda
Payment Due

22
2:00 AM Dept of
Justice (Philadelph...)

24

2:00 AM G. Dempsey (Las


Vegas)

2:00 AM FBI National


5:00 PM Haccker Security (FBI Pittsb...)
Destop
8:30 AM London - 4
Conest... (220)
Bombings (Warren-She...)
8:00
PM Cingular (Cingular
-...)
9:00 PM depart for
scac to Austin Dell

28
1:45 PM Dell,
Inc. (Dell City,...)

29

30

31

12:00 PM Clipper Stadium 9:00 AM Chapter 11 Brief 11:00


- Joe P... (Texas)
due to Judge Anita Brod... AM Files
broken into at
MG... (Las

Julianne McKinney
CATERBONE
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Family
Army
U.S.
Intel
Amicus
Mind
Officer
Control
for Kathleen
& TI
KanePage
Page
Page151
112
187
10 of 336
10
414
453
1 of 2

23
3:00 AM kennett (scacpool)

Tuesday
TuesdayJune
July
July30,
12,
5, 2016
8/1/2005 11:44 AM

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 188 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

FEB, 1987

MAY, 1987

June, 1987

Mortgage Banking
Activities Are Started
Meet With Power
Station Studios For
Digital Movie

Take Control of
Board of Directors
Beat Commonwealth
Bank on $5 Million Mtg.
Meet with Movie Producers
Develop SONY Proposal
& PSDMS (Power Station
Digital Movie System)

Purchase Airplane
$25,000 Down
FMG 2 Years Ahead of Plan
Value Approx. $5 million
Named Executive Producer
Of Digital Movie

June 23, 1987

June 25, 1987

June 29, 1987

10:30 Meet with


ISC, My Office
Fraud Allegations

Receive Patent
Research for
Digital Movie/FMG

Dave Cook/Bennet
Williams Deal, Kauffman
Tries to Steal Deal

ISC/Ferranti
Reviewing Merger

Kauffman & Company


Burglarize My Office
& Forge Stock Certificates

Meet w/Romar Aviation


To Move Plane From
Lancaster Aviation

2:00 pm Have My
Locks Changed To
My Office

Kauffman Tells Me Via


Telephone of Stock
Certificate by Mistake

4:30 Fly to Phil for


Meetings, Fly to
Stone Harbor
Lancaster Aviation
Grounds Plane

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 152
113
188 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 189 of 336


TIMELINE OF EVENTS

July 2, 1987

July 3, 1987

July 4, 1987

Remove All Files


From My Office
At Night.

Visit With Joe


Roda, Offers No
Help, Suggests
I Get Some Rest
After Hearing My
Story.

Early In AM Pilot
Calls And Said The
Bank Repos Plane
In The Middle of The
Night With All Files
On Board/23 days before
1st Payment/Loose $25,000

Kauffman tells client


John Green that Stan
Is Having Mental
Problems.

Load Files On Plane


For Stone Harbor.
Drive to Stone Harbor
Romar Aviation Is To
Fly Files To Stone Harbor
The Next Mourning.

Call Joe Roda, He Told


Me To Quit Fabricating
Things.
Hire Pilot To Fly To Lanc.
To Get Files From Plane.

July 5-10, 1987

July 6th , 1987

July 14, 1987

Meet With Attorneys

Commonwealth Bank
Sends notice of Repo
4 days after it was taken.

PSG Revokes Securities


Licenses, No Reason Given.

Try To Salvage Dave


Cook Deal/Heard I
Am Having Problems.

Meet With Tony Bongiovi


in Wildwood re: Digital
Movie, rumors of insanity
have reached everyone.

Dr. Umiker removes


me as Trustee Of Estate.

2
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 153
114
189 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 190 of 336


TIMELINE OF EVENTS

July 16, 1987

July 14th

Kauffman Sends
Letter To All Clients
Notifying Them That
I Am No Longer With
FMG, Ltd., And I May
Not Handle Investments
At All.

Contact The Following


Authorities For Help:
Fed SEC; NASD, Atlanta
Bennett Ripole; SEC John
Nocella; Cong. Robert
Walker, Sen Gib Armstrong
Manheim Twp. Police, Etc.,
Fred Martin (FBI Harisburg.
Travel To Sulfolk Library To
Research Lender Liability,
In Boston, MA.

Pay Atty Lew Schweller


Of NJ $500 Retainer Fee.

1987

July 22, 1987

July 24th, 1987

Dave Cook Decides Not


To Do The Bennett Williams
Deal And States That I Have
Been Advised By My
Attorney Not To Associate
With You.

Mike Hartlett Sends Letter


To All FMG Creditors Stating
That I Never Had Authority To
Make Corporate CommitmentsTake
On Behalf Of FMG Or Make Any
Financial Decisions On
Behalf Of FMG.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 154
115
190 of 336
414
453

July 21st, 1987


Travel To Santa Barbara
CA To Law Firm Of Cappelo
& Foley, Who Specializes
In Lender Liability Fraud
With Banks. See Invoice.
Visit With Gamillion Studios
Of Hollywood CA To Discuss
Restructuring The Debt Of
The Studio. Meet With
Austin Properties For MTG
Banking. Allegations Of
Insanity Had Reached My
Hollywood CA Contacts.
August 7, 1987
Contact Dr. Marshall
Levin Of Northfield, NJ
For Psychiatric Evaluation.
MMPI Test For $250.00
In An Attempt To Subdue The
Allegations Of Insanity.

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 191 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

August 11th , 1987

August 14th, 1987

August 28th, 1987

Family Members Abduct


Me & I Am Taken To The
Stone Harbor Police Station
And Then To The Burdette
Tomlin Hospital Where A Phone
Phone Call Was Made Earlier
That Day Saying Stan Had
A Gun And Was Going To
The Beach To Kill Himself.
I Was Released After I Would
Sign A Suicide Letter.

Family Members Again


Invade My House In Stone
Harbor Trying To Get A
Confession Of Wrongdoing.
I Travel To Avalon To Try To
Get A Restraining Order, But
I Am Arrested On The Way To
The Police Station For Speeding.
The Avalon Police Impounded
My Car, And Kept Me In Prison
For 4 Hours.

In A Desperate Plea For Help,


After All Authorities Ignored Me,
I contact Dianne Sawyer, Of
CBS News 60 Minutes.
See Receipt.

Receive My Credit Report


From the Lancaster Credit
Bureau Reporting That Up Until
July 30, My Credit Report was
Flawless, With All Accounts
Paid Within 30 Days.

Receive Letter From FMG Board


Threatening To File Criminal
Charges And Refusing To Discuss
Any Talks Regarding My Past
Affiliation.

4
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 155
116
191 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 192 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

September 1st, 1987

September 3, 1987

September 3, 1987

I Call A Meeting With


Bob Long and Alan Loss
of FMG, Ltd., in Lancaster.

I Board At The Cape May


Airport at about 1:30 pm.
To Lancaster.

Romar Aviation Owes Me


A Flight, So I Schedule A
Charter Flight For September
3rd, From Cape May To
Lancaster

FMG, Ltd., Calls The Manheim


Township Police And Reports
That I Had Made A Bomb Threat
Two Days Earlier, On September
1st. Manheim Township Police
Issue A Warrant For My Arrest For
Terroristic Threats, Just Before I
Am Scheduled To Land In Lancaster.

I End Up In Jail With


The Following Charges:
Burglary, Theft,
Unlawful Use Of A
Computer, Terroristic
Threats, Robbery,
Criminal Mischief, And
Unlawful Restraint.

I Borrow A Friends Car To Go To


Play Basketball. I See One Of My
Secretaries And She Is Crying
Hysterical. Insinuating That I Had
Committed A Horrendous Crime.
I Politely Ask For The Keys To FMG

The Conestoga Police


Let Me Ride In The
Front Seat, The Manheim
Twp. Police Physically
And Mentally Abused
Me.
Lancaster Nespapers
Prints Ex-Worker
Charged In Burglary
At Firm and Conestoga
Man Linked To Theft

Later That Night I Went Into My Office


And Removed My Lost Files.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 156
117
192 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 193 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

Sept 4th To Sept 9th 1987

Sept. 9th To Sept. 15th 1987

Sept. 15th, 1987

Committed To Lancaster
County Prison. Placed In
Psychiatric Cell Unit.
Plead For Someone To
Post Bail. After Posting
Bail, I Am Coerced Into
The St. Joseph Hospital
Psychiatric Ward, As The
Only Way I Can Get Out Of
Jail, By Robert Byer, Atty.

Involuntarily Committed To The


Psychiatric Unit of The St. Joseph
Hospital.

Attorney Robert Byer


Admits That I Am Not
Legally Committed To
The Psychiatric Ward.

September 21st, 1987

September 28th, 1987

September 29th, 1987

Lancaster Newspapers
Headlines Reports The
ISC/Ferrantti Merger,
Said To Be Worth A
Billion Dollars.

St. Joseph Hospital


Demands Payment Of
$3,064.66 For The Seven
Days of Hospitalization
In The Psychiatric Unit.

Investigator Howard
Eisler Of The PA
Securities Commission
Conducts A Five Hour
Interview In My Home
With Attorney Robert
Beyer, And Client
Bill Johnson. I Discuss
ISC Allegations In
Detail.

I Immediately Order
For My Discharge And
Walk Out Of The
Hospital And Go Home.

6
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 157
118
193 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 194 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

October 2, 1987

October 5, 1987

October 7, 1987

District Justice Murray


Horton Presides Over
Preliminary Hearing For
All Charges. Transcript
Provides Evidence of
Perjury By Almost All
Witnesses Testimony.

Sir Speedy Printing


duplicates 1103
Images Billed To The
Law Firm Of Arnold,
Beyer & Homsher

Farmers First Bank


And Hamilton Bank
Refuse To Cash A
Check From FSC
Agency, In Atlanta
At The Park City
Branches.

Several Creditors File


Judgments For Non
Payment.
Parent Federal Bank
(ISC Owned) Proceeds
With Foreclosure Against
My House.
Unemployment Compensation
Review Board Denies Benefits
Due To Criminal Wrongdoing.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 158
119
194 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 195 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

October 10, 1987

November 9, 1987

November 20, 1987

Meeting With Intercon


Special Services, Which
Specializes In White
Collar Crime. The
Meeting Was In New
York

The Pennsylvania
Unemployment Compensation
Review Board Denies Me
Benefits Due To Willful
Misconduct When
To My Own Property

Attorney Robert Byer


Corresponds Regarding
The Preparation Of
My Defense Against
All Charges Pending

November 25, 1987

November 30, 1987

November 31, 1987

Pennsylvania Securities
Commission Sends Notice
That Complaint Must Be
Submitted In Writing In
Order To Be Considered.

Attorney Lew Schweller


Of New Jersey, Demands
Payment of $1460 For
Legal Services In The
Summer.

Law Firm Of Capello


And Fol.ey, Of Santa
Barbara, CA Returns
3 Binders Of Documents
Which I Delivered In
July.

I Submit 9,079
Documents For
Processing Into
Diazode Microfiche
At Good Sheppard
Industries, Reading.

8
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 159
120
195 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 196 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

December 1, 1987

December 19, 1987

January 8, 1988

I Personally Deliver
Evidence To Senator
Gib Armstrong and PA
Securities Commission
Investigator Howard
Eisler In Harrisburg.

I File Complaint No.


08662 With The U.S.
Postal Inspector Which
Refereed To The Changing
Of My Address By FMG
Executives.

The Pennsylvania
Unemployment
Compensation Review
Board Again Denies
Benefits.

January 14, 1988

January 15, 1988

January 26, 1988

Purchase Mobile Home


To Travel To California
To Meet With Attorney
Sandra Gray, In San
Diego.

Secretar-Al Transcribes
10 Microcassette Tapes
To Electronic Word Format.

The Pennsylvania
Housing & Financing
Agency Denies
Benefits Under The
Homeowners
Emergency Assistance
Program.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 160
121
196 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 197 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

February 4, 1988

March 14, 1988

March 21, 1988

Lancaster Aviation Files


A Civil Complaint For
$3,411 Allegedly From
Repair Work On My
Plane

Parent Federal
Bank Files Formal
Foreclosure Notice
For My Home. In
Conestoga

The Lancaster
County District
Attorneys Office
Formally Drops
All Criminal Charges
After $2,000 In
Restitution Is Paid.

October 25, 1988

October 30, 1990

October 31, 1990

Mr. Robert Kauffman


Purchases 40,000
Shares Of FMG, Ltd.,.
For $60,000

Congressman Robert
Walker Reports The
Status Of My Complaint
Involving A $2.5 Million
Department of Defense
Contract For The Defense
Mapping Agency (DMA) To
Digitize And Publish On
CD-ROM Medium.

Department Of
Defense Agrees
To Reopening The
Bidding, Which
Included Me, Sony,
Phillips DuPont, and
Disc Manufacturing
Inc.,

10
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 161
122
197 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 198 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

October 23, 1990

November 18, 1990

December 12, 1990

The Assistant Secretary


Of Defense Dave Gribben
And Brigadier General
Kelly, Intervene In Contract
Dispute.

The National Institute


Of Standards And
Technology, NIST, Approves
An Article Written By Me
And Computer Scientist
John Garofolo Escaping The
Unix Tar Pit Printed In DISC
Magazine.

Travel To Captiva
Island To Program
And Produce The
Information For The
AMG Legal System
CD-ROM, Containing
All Of My Evidence.

February, 1991

April 16, 1991

May 16, 1991

Mr. Jay Curtis Solicits Me


Me To A Joint Venture For
The Department of
Defense.

The Audio CD Containing


The Evidence Is
Mastered and Replicated
At American Helix.

At the Tech Lab


At Commodore
Computer, In West
Chester, PA, I
PreMaster and Master
One-Off CD-ROM of
AMG Legal Systems.

Mr. Curtis Became


Increasingly Interested
In The CD-ROM, And
Began To Interrogate
Me As To What I Was
Going To Do.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 162
123
198 of 336
414
453

11

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 199 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

May 23, 1991

May 24, 1991

May 28th, 1991

Mr. Jay Curtis Calls


And Interrogates Me
Extensively About The
CIA Activities With ISC
And Tells Me That The
Authorities Have My
Information.

I Travel To Stone
Harbor, New Jersey
And In A Newspaper, I
Learn Of The CIA And
ISC Story.

The Stone Harbor


Police Pull Me Over
And Arrest Me For
Drinking And Driving,
However, I kept Passing
The Breathalyzer Tests.
I Ended Up In Prison,
Again, For Nothing.

In Fear For My Life, I


Pack My Bags.
That Night On ABC
News Nightline, Ted
Koppel Featured The
Story About The CIA
And ISC.
Allegations Of Insanity
Have Already Begun.

I Plant Several CD-ROMs of


The AMG Legal Systems In
Various Strategic Places.

There was one attempt


on my life.
October 12, 1991
I Meet Ted Koppel At
The Dulles Airport In
Washington, D.C. And
Ask Him If He Knew Mr.
Jay Curtis, And Told Him
How I Was Interrogated Just
Hours Before The CIA and
ISC Sell Arms To Iraq.

12
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 163
124
199 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 200 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

November 12, 1997

November 23, 1997

December 2nd , 1997

I E-Mail Lancaster
Newspapers About
ISC And My Story.

I Write For A Legal


Opinion From Attorney
Christina Rainville, And
Attorney Mat Samly, Of
Xekallis, Reese, & Pugh.
Mr. Samley promises to
have a 6 page opinion
Immediately after the holidays.

I receive via certified


mail return receipt
materials & letter from
Ms. Rainville stating her
Firm will not take any
new clients from
Lancaster County.

December 22, 1997


I send letter to Dr. Shulz
describing my need to
resolve all issues due to
my inability to bear the
fruits of my labor due to
The mitigating
circumstances.

December 29th, 1997


I Send Letter And Evidence
Ted Kopple of ABC News
Nightline.

December 31st, 1997


I Deliver Evidence To
Chambers Of U.S.
District Judge Stewart
Dalzall in Philadelphia
Courthouse.

I also begin to make


a diary of the mental duress
at Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

I receive a threat from Jim


Christian via telephone who
said if you raise these issues
again, your life will be much
worst off than it is now, let it be.
He continued to try to threaten me
from raising these issues.

Page 164
125
200 of 336
414
453

13

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 201 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

January 13, 1998


In a desperate plead
for intervention with
the mental duress at
Pflumm Cont., and the
invasion of my privacy
all trying to stop my
pursuit of justice I call
Fr. Lavelle at the Office
Of the Bishop for help
and advise. A meeting
is set for the next morning
at 9:00 am.
Coincidentally Dr. Al Shulz
calls me to reschedule my
Quarterly checkup soon after
following my meeting with
Fr. Lavelle, in Harrisburg.
Pam Pflumm arrives at my
house in the evening trying to
confuse me and annoy me
before my meetings.

January 14, 1998


I meet with Fr. Lavelle
who mysteriously would
on suggest that I continue
to talk to my therapist
and would not call Dave
Pflumm to alleviate the
incidents of mental duress
unless Al Shulz would tell
him to do so.
Pam Pflumm call me on
My car phone as soon as
I leave the Bishops Office
crying hysterically that
she needs to see me and
wants to go to Dr. Shulzs
office with me. She demands
To go with me to my appointment
but I make her wait in the car.
I sense wrongdoing, and tape
record my session with Dr.
Shulz, who

January 14th Cont.


before I speak one
word tells me Stan
you are sick, you are
not well, you need to
take different medicine
you need help. The last
time that I saw Dr. Shulz
in September, I was fine.
Someone apparently
called Dr. Shulz prior to
my arrival. See Tape.
January 15th, 1998
I send a certified letter
to Dr. Al Shulz notifying
him that I am leaving his
practice.
Everyone makes an
ordeal of my session
with Dr. Shulz as if
I was some lunatic, it
is a violation of my right
privacy.

14
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 165
126
201 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 202 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

January 16, 1998


Due to the inflammation
of further mental duress
I take my 1 st sick day and
take my 2 week vacation
in an effort for a cooling-off
period at Pflumm
Contractors, Inc., in order
to protect my sanity.

February 5, 1998
In a desperate plead to
resolve the issues I file
a formal complaint to the
PA Chapter of the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
in Philadelphia, PA.

February 171998
ACLU responds that
they do not have the
available resources
to look into my case.

February 19th, 1998


At 11:30 pm Pam Pflumm
arrives at my home, and
after I request her to leave
Several occasions, she tries
to convince me that my mother
is dying - she said Your
mother Is dying, and you
dont even care.

February 20th, 1998


Immediately upon
entering my office
I confront Dave Pflumm
and ask him if my mother
is dying, He had no
response.

See Diary of Mental


Duress filed with the PA
Unemployment Comp. Office.

February 17, 1998


Immediately prior to the
telephone call from the ACLU
I had mailed a personal letter
to Bishop Dittilo of the Dioc.
of Harrisburg pleading for
help and intervention
regarding all matters.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 166
127
202 of 336
414
453

15

Frank Kent of the ACLU


had called me at my
Office to inform me
that they did not have
the resources to
consider my case.
which I had politely
questioned.

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 203 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

February 20th, 1998 (Cont)


Extremely distraught and
upset I went home at lunch
and called Mr. Kenneth
Burnette, Stepfather of
Pam Pflumm, and Chaplain at
Lancaster General Hospital
and asked him to talk to Pam
Pflumm.
That evening I had dropped
a copy of the letter to Bishop
Dittilo into his mailbox.

February 28, 1998


Coincidentally, more than
2 months late, I receive
a legal opinion from
Mr. Matt Samley of Xekallis,
Reese, and Pugh. Which
Was totally without any
legal merit.

February 22, 1998


Mr. Keneth Burnette comes
to visit me at my home to discuss
my note. He said that Pam
never said my mother was dying
but rather that she was sick. He
states that my situation is over
his head . I told him that work
has been like Hell for the past
Several months and asked him
to help. He repeated to me, so
work is like Hell?. He said he
would check on me. And I
Distinctly told him that I will call
him if I wanted to see him.

March 17, 1998


Mr. Ken Burnette continued to
come to my home on at least 5
more occasions despite my polite
way of saying, dont call me Ill call
you.

February 25, 1998


I file a claim for
Unemployment
Compensation on the
grounds of quitting due
to mental duress caused
Mr. David Pflumm and
several key employees,
that had begun when
be began to pursue
my claim for justice for
the issues of the past
ten years.

I am again denied
Unemployment
Compensation for the
3rd time in my life.

16
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 167
128
203 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 204 of 336

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

March 24, 1998

April 13, 1998

April 21, 1998

I file an appeal with the


Lancaster Job Center for
Unemployment Comp.
Benefits.

A hearing is held at
the Lancaster Job Center
for UC Benefits with D.D.
Hukill presiding as Referee
and myself and Dave Pflumm
in attendance. My testimony
is my diary of mental duress.
We ate lunch afterwards at
P.J. Mathews in Place Marie

My appeal for UC
Benefits is again
denied for illegitimate
reasons including
discrimination for
going to Fr. Lavelle
to intervene into the
problems at Pflumm
Contractors.

I reject the offer


from her due to
questionable motives.

April 27, 1998


I file another appeal
to the UC Board of Review
for my UC benefits.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 168
129
204 of 336
414
453

17

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 205 of 336


AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZELL

I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according to law, make the following affidavit concerning the years during which I was
maliciously and purposefully mentally abused, subjected to a massive array of prosecutorial misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive fight
for the sovereignty of my constitutional rights, shareholder rights, civil liberties, and right of due access to the law. I will detail a deliberate
attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting the dire consequences of this complaint. These allegations are substantiated through a
preponderance of evidence including but not limited to over 10,000 documents, over 50 hours of recorded conversations, transcripts, and
archived on several digital mediums. A Findings of Facts is attached herewith providing merits and the facts pertaining to this affidavit.
These issues and incidents identified herein have attempted to conceal my disclosures of International Signal & Control, Plc. However, the
merits of the violations contained in this affidavit will be proven incidental to the existence of any conspiracy.

The plaintiff protests the courts for all remedial actions mandated by law. Financial considerations would exceed $1 million. These violations
began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident and business owner in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and have continued to the present.
These issues are a direct consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc., of County of Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased
my interests in International Signal & Control., Plc.. I will also prove intentional undo influence against family and friends towards
compromising the credibility of myself, with malicious and selfserving accusations of insanity. I conclude that the courts must provide me
with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the process must void any technical deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the
conclusions. Such arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our Constitution .

1. The activities contained herein may raise the argument of fair disclosure regarding the

scope of law pertaining to issues and activities

compromising the National Security of the United States. The Plaintiff will successfully argue that due to the criminal record of International
Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to an end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure must be forfeited by
virtue that said activities posed a direct compromise to the National Security of the United States.; the plaintiff will argue that his public
allegations of misconduct within the operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., as early as June of 1987 ;demonstrated actions were
proven to protect the National Security of the United States.. The activities of International Signal & Control, Pls., placed American troops in
harms way. The plaintiffs actions should have taken the American troops out of harms way causing the activities of the International Signal
& Control, Plc., to cease and desist.

18
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 169
130
205 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 206 of 336


All activities contained herein have greatly compromised the National Security of the United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must
apply towards the Plaintiffs intent and motive of protecting the rights of his fellow citizens. Had the plaintiff been protected under the law,
and subsequently had the law enforcement community of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer
justice, United States troops may have been taken out of harms way, as a direct result of ceasing the operations of International Signal &
Control, Plc., in as early as 1987.

2. The plaintiff will successfully prove that the following activities and the prosecutorial misconduct were directed at intimidating the plaintiff
from continuing his public disclosures regarding illegal activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,. On June 23, 1998, International
Signal & Control, Plc was negotiating for the $1.14 billion merger with Ferranti International, of England. Such disclosures threatened the
integrity of International Signal & Controls organization, and Mr. James Guerin himself, consequently resulting in adverse financial
considerations to all parties if such disclosures provided any reason to question the integrity of the transaction, which later became the
central criminal activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern District

3. The plaintiff will prove that undo influence was also responsible for the adverse

Of Pennsylvania.

consequences and fabricated demise of his business

enterprises and personal holdings. The dire consequences of the plaintiffs failed business dealings will demonstrate and substantiate
financial incentive and motive. Defendants responsible for administering undo influence and interference in the plaintiffs business and
commercial enterprises had financial interests. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a taxing authority, Lancaster County had a great
investment whos demise would facilitate grave consequences to its economic development. . Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon) would
have less competition in the mortgage banking business and other financial services, violating the
lender liability laws . The Steinman Enterprises, Inc., would loose a pioneer in the information technologies industries, and would protect the
public domain from truthful disclosure. The plaintiff will also provide significant evidence of said perpetrators violating common laws
governing intellectual property rights.

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 170
131
206 of 336
414
453

19

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 207 of 336


4. Given the plaintiffs continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning in June of 1987 and continuing to the present,
the plaintiff must be given fair access to the law with the opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the federal and state
statutes. The plaintiff will successfully argue his rights to the courts to rightfully claim civil actions with regards to the totality of these
activities, so described in the following Findings of Facts, regardless of any statute of limitations. Given the plaintiffs genuine efforts for
due process has been inherently and maliciously obstructed, the courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial actions
deserving to the plaintiff.

5. Under current laws, the plaintiffs intellectual capacity has been exploited as means of discrediting the plaintiffs disclosures and
obstructing the plaintiffs right to due process of the law. The plaintiff has always had the proper rights under federal and state laws to enter
into contract. The logic and reason towards the plaintiffs activities and actions are a matter of record, demonstrated in the Findings of
Facts, contained herein.. The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that the inherent emotional consequences

to all of the activities

contained herein have resulted in Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.

The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be the direct result of the activities contained herein, rather than the
exhibited behavior of any mental deficiency the plaintiff may or may not have. The courts must provide for the proper interpretations of all
laws, irrespective of the plaintiffs alleged intellectual capacity. The plaintiff successfully argue that his mental capacity is of very little
legal consequence, if any; other than in its malicious representations used to diminish the credibility of the plaintiff.

6. The plaintiff will demonstrate that the following incidents of illegal prosecutions were purposefully directed at intimidating the plaintiff
from further public disclosure into the activities of International Signal & Control, Plc., consequently obstructing the plaintiffs access to due
process of the law. Due to the fact that these activities to which the plaintiffs perpetrators were protecting were illegal activities, the RICO
statutes would apply. To this day, the plaintiff has never been convicted of any crime with the exception of 2 speeding tickets. The following
report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial misconduct during the prosecutions and activities beginning on June 23, 1987 and continuing
to today.

20
CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 171
132
207 of 336
414
453

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 208 of 336

7)
Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the courts must conclude that In The United
States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzalls findings of April 14, 1997,
in the Lisa Lambert case identifying acts of prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this affidavit, now discloses
evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial misconduct, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of
Lancaster. Criminal law must now determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible criminal
enterprise. This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that this affidavit compromises the
very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights..
In the truthfulness of this affidavit, The Commonwealth must concede Lisa Michelle Lambert to balance the scales of
justice, which no other act could accomplish. Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle
Lambert to the superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by its own admission of wrongdoing, assuring
the peoples of its commitment to administer equalities of justice, not inequalities of justice. Balancing the scales of
justice. Anything less, would take the full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our
democracy and impugning the Constitution of the United States. The plaintiff must be restored to whole.

Authored and Produced on September 17, 2015 by,

Stan J. Caterbone
MOVANT
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
717-459-7588 Fax

CATERBONE Family U.S.Amicus


CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Mind Control
for Kathleen Kane

Page 172
133
208 of 336
414
453

21

Tuesday
TuesdayJuly
July12,
5, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page209
1 ofof183
336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

______________________________________
EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as
Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
Published by Advanced Media Group June 2, 2016

______________________________________
June 5, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual
2. Transcript of the Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015 Passing
a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based Weapons in Support of the Many
Targeted Individuals Suffering Symptoms of the City.
3. Karen Stewart, NSA Whistleblower and Targeted Individual
4. There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths
5. EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its Corruption # Karen
Stewart
6. The Interview
7. NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light by Karen Stewart
8. The Interview
9. Julianne McKinney, US Army Intelligence Officer, Whistleblower, and Targeted
Individual
10.
Transcript Of Greg Szymanskis Interview With Julianne Mckinney
11.
Dr. Nick Begich, Author and Expert Researcher of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control
12.
October 1, 2015 Nick Begich Lecture at the Covert Harassment Conference
in Berlin, Germany

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
209
11of
1of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page210
2 ofof183
336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

__________________________________
EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as
Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
________________________________
June 2, 2016

BACKGROUND
Stan J. Caterbone's International Signal & Control or ISC Whistleblowing History and Mind
Control Relationships are outlined in the following statements and declarations, which have already
been proven and verified and have never been specifically contested in any court of law:
Stan J. Caterbone was a Federal Whistleblower in 1987 regarding ISC
The 29 False Arrests and Prosecutorial Misconduct that Stan J. Caterbone was subject to in 1987
through 2015 was an effort to cover-up the allegations made by Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring and
Summer of 1987 after the Meeting of June 23, 1987 with ISC and United Chem Con Executive Larry
Resch.
The ISC Fraud and Sales of Arms to Iraq Story by the ABC News Nightline with Ted Koppel and the
Financial Times of London in May, July, and September of 1991 was most likely initiated or was
corroborated by Lancaster Newspapers reporter Thomas Flannary.
Thomas Flannary's mysterious death in February of 2004 was either murder or was a cover story to
hide the fact that he was a CIA operative used to control the flow of information, disinformation, and
propaganda. It is highly subject that he began his career with Lancaster Newspapers in 1987 and is not
a native Lancastrian.
The ISC merger was not completed until December of 1987, 3 months after the False Arrests of Stan
J. Caterbone.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
210
22of
2of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page211
3 ofof183
336

The official meeting with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler in September of
1987, which was solicited by Agent Eisler was an effort to illegally interrogate Stan J. Caterbone without
a legal subpoena.
In the months after the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry Resch Stan J. Caterbone had
personally solicited a vast array of local, state, and federal officials, including the FBI and Congressman
Robert Walker, PA State Representative Gibson Armstrong for assistance in the retaliation and slander
campaign that was in progress. There is credible linkage between the ISC Scandal, U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, Stan J. Caterbone's family VICTIMIZATION of the same, and the participation of
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
The Zook Murder Appeal proves that Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis, Judge James Cullen,
and Judge Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas were all involved in U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control before 2004 and before Stan J. Caterbone went public with his VICTIMIZATION of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former director of the National Security Agency (NSA) was on the Board of
Directors of ISC and was involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Technologies through his company
S.A.I.C. Corporation. Bobby Ray Inman would later be selected by Former President Bill Clinton for his
Director of Defense, but would later remove himself due to allegations and public scrutiny for his role in
the ISC scandal.
In the Fall of 1991 Robert Gates was nominated for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
and during his televised confirmation hearings the was subject to brutal array of questions concerning
his participation in the ISC scandal. He went on to be nominated and later would serve both the Bush
Administrations and the Obama Administrations as Secretary of Defense until resigning in 2011.
There have been at least 3 documented attempts on the life of Stan J. Caterbone; 1987, 1991, and
2004, all attempts at vehicular homicide. Thomas P. Caterbone's passing in 1996 was the result of a
wrongful death claim by Fulton Bank. Samuel A. Caterbone was most likely an KULTRA murder tactic in
Santa Barbara, California on December 25, 1984. Samuel P. Caterbone was most likely the result of an
MKULTRA murder tactic on July 20,2001 in New York city.
The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and criminal enterprise that
violates both civil and criminal RICO statutes and antitrust statutes.
The above would constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group in U.S.
District Courts, specifically in the Eastern District for Pennsylvania Case No. 05-2288, 06-4650, 1402559, and other related cases; and Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
211
33of
3of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page212
4 ofof183
336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

Richmond City Council


May 19, 2015
Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015

Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based


Weapons in Support of the Many Targeted Individuals
Suffering Symptoms of the City
Transcribed for Advanced Media Group, Originally published:

May 19, 2015

Richmond, California City Council hears from victims and advocates and votes in support of the Space
Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.

Jovanka Beckles Council Member Introduced This Resolution

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
212
44of
4of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page213
5 ofof183
336
RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL BANS SPACED-BASED WEAPONS
COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 19, 2015
Mayor:

One is to adopt a resolution in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Spaced-Based

Treaty to permanently ban Space-based weapons. And we have 15 speakers for this item.
Council Member Beckles, would you like to introduce this?
Beckles : I would. You know I think what I would like to do is just kind of rehash the statement of this
issue for those that dont have the agenda in front of them. The city of Richmond is a welcoming and safe
area for all of our residents. We have led the way in so many initiatives that protect and provide the rights
for all of our residents to feel safe. And so its imperative that Richmond adopt this resolution in order to
stand in solidarity with residents who claim to be under assault with spaced-based weapons that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act.
Now, the thing about this is that were not trying something new here. This is in support of what is already
there at the federal level. So we say as a council we support this treaty thats already in affect and we also
support our residents who are feeling attacked by certain kinds of weapons. And so the purpose of this
resolution is to show support for our residents that identify themselves as targeted individuals by
supporting the Space Preservation Act thats been passed by Congress and the Space Preservation Treaty
to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.
Now, many targeted individuals believe they have been personally attacked by weaponry that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act. Some years ago one of the residents who is going to talk now, I
met with her. I met with many of them, to talk about this issue. Ive also spoken with our police
department. The representative from the department was Captain Gagan to figure out how law
enforcement can support these individuals, first of all, by at least listening and not assuming, and actually
just taking reports of incidences that are reported. And the police department was open to that, and is
open to that, and are willing to work with our residents in helping them to feel safe. Because its important
that we all feel safe living in our city. And in our city we have put forth our best effort to listen and respect
the voices and wisdom and experiences of our residents.
And so I dont intend to ignore it and Im hoping that my colleagues on this (unclear word) wont ignore,
but support those who suspect they have been exposed to these types of inhumane attacks with the intent
to cause them great emotional and bodily harm. And Im encouraged by these residents, these citizens of
Richmond, who stood up to protect these other residents here. Id like to encourage other officials at the
local, state and national level to explore methods to expand support to all residents. And as many as
you can see those of us with an agenda in front of us, and those who dont have an agenda in front of
you, who may be watching, or the livecast on the web, is that there is no financial impact to this. This is
not going to cost anything and its not going to hurt anyone to pass it. But it certainly would continue to
cause emotional distress to those who are being targeted if we dont pass this. And I urge you to support
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
213
55of
5of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page214
6 ofof183
336
all of our residents in the city.
Mayor@ Do we have questions from council members? Okay, Vice Mayor.
V Mayor@ Just real quickly. You mentioned that this was passed by Congress. Can you tell me when that
happened because Im trying to look it up now and I thought that was just introduced in 2001 and never
was
Beckles@ Actually, Ms Anderson can probably answer that question. When was it passed at the federal
level, Ms Anderson?
Anderson@

9/10/2002. Space Preservation Act, former Congressman Dennis Cosenich had introduced

this bill.
Vice Mayor@ But was that

Mayor@

Were sort of getting out of our process here. I think that (word unclear) do you have other

questions?
Vice Mayor@ Well, Im looking at the sheet that youre looking at. It looks like thats when the Burkley
City Council passed a resolution, not when Congress passed the law. Im looking on line at the House
website. And I know that theres, I understand that theres been multiple versions of this so I dont know if
its been passed or not. But from what it looks like here, it doesnt look like that version was passed by
Congress, so I dont know if it was. But I understand the Burkley City Council passed it on 9/10 of 2002.
Mayor@ Other questions from the council?
Mayor@

So I had a couple of questions. Im looking at the resolution and it talks about the Space

Preservation Act. Can you tell me what act that was? Theres never been a Space Preservation Act passed,
right?
Beckles@ It wasnt passed. It was brought forward by the Representative, the Congressman at the time.
Because there were some, you know how it goes in Washington, theres just a lot of power play. So it
never gotbut it did get passed in 2002 in Burkley. So were making ours similar to the one that was
passed in Burkley.
Mayor@ Well it doesnt say anything about Burkley here. All it says is the Space Preservation Act. Are you
talking about the resolution Burkley passed or are you talking about one of the two resolutions that
Representative Cosenich introduced in 2001 and 2002?
Beckles@ Well because that one didnt pass were just making reference that it was brought forward by
Dennis Cosenich, and of course politics being the way they are, it did not pass. So this is, Im making
reference to and using the Burkley model as an example of ours.
Mayor@ Which one of the Cosenich resolutions did the Burkley model refer to?
Anderson@ HR3616. House Resolution 3616.

Mayor@ I didnt hear you, what?

Anderson@ House Resolution 3616.

Mayor@ 3615.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
214
66of
6of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page215
7 ofof183
336
Anderson

C616. 1. 6.

Mayor The research I did on this, that resolution was substantially different than HR2977.
Anderson Yes sir.

Mayor

And significantly it omitted any references to chem trails, particle beams, electromagnetic

radiation, plasmas, extremely low frequency or ultra-high frequency energy radiation and mind control
technology. So, the question I have is, it seemed to me, it was your intent to include all these in it, right?
So if you go with HR3616 and we approve this, it will not include any of these things I named. Was that
your intent?
Beckles That was not my intent. My intent, and working with staff, of course, it helped put this together,
because we know that we get help with our staff. The intention was to include all of the things that people
are feeling, yeah, that people are feeling the pressures of and feeling the attacks of, and so I think thatI
dont know how much of this issue that Burkley had in theirs. But I think that to include these, and this is
the resolution saying we support this treaty, this act. Then Id like to have it in there. Because again, to
me its important that we defend, that we support and that we protect our residents. And so if these are
the things that residents are saying theyre feeling, then it should be in there.
Mayor Well, all Burkley did, and Im looking at the Burkley resolution, and it just says, It is the will of
the council and the city of Burkley that the US Senate and House of Representatives enact, and the US
President sign and enforce the Space Preservation Act. But Im confused because there were actually two
Space Preservation Acts introduced and I think if were going to do this right, we need to define which one
were going to support. Because theyre different.
Beckles Youre absolutely right. And I want the best one to move forward as well, and Im sure that the
residents want the best one and so.
Mayor Which one is the best one?
Anderson HR2977.

Mayor So that would be HR2977.


Anderson Yes.

Beckles Which is the one that includes


Anderson Everything.

Mayor Ok, so, with that in mind, I dont have any more council people... oh I do too. Council Member
yeah, Ive got a bunch; Council Member Martinez and Council Member McLaughlin.
MartineA Yes, I wanted to change the language to say that we endorse the intent of the act since the
act is not actually in place.
Mayor The intent of which act?

MartineA The intent of the second act.


Mayor The second one is HR3616.

Beckles Are you talking about HR2977 which includes all that, right? Which includes the chem trails. Is

that right?
Mayor: Thats my understanding of it.
Beckles Is that right, Council Member Martinez?
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
215
77of
7of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page216
8 ofof183
336
Martine Is that the revision? Right.
Mayor Council Member McLaughlin.
McLaughlin: Actually I did some research on this too. Apparently Representative Cosenich didnt read
fully the first resolution that was brought forward in his name. He brought it forward based on some
recommendations. And when he realized it was drawn out to the level that it was, he pulled it. And he
brought forward the second one, which is 3616, which I think is more general.
Many of us remember, just to share some input going back, many of us remember in the 80s, Ronal
Reagan brought forth the Strategic Defense Initiative, which was later dubbed Star Wars, you know, thats
where this all came from. Basically, it was to put weapons technology into space as a global shield, as a
supposed defense against China and the Soviet Union. It was later seen as infeasible. And many others..
many people saw this as the idea to put weapons in spacewas insane. And I happen to think it was a
crazy idea, as did the population at large.
Then the Clinton administration in 1993 morphed it into the Ballistic Missile Defense. Later in 2002, which
is currently now the Missile Defense Agency. But also, along the way, in 2002 Dennis Cosenich introduced
this bill, and its the second one that he fully introduced, 3616, which basically called for a ban on spacedbased weapons. And then it was, I think it was just introduced, a co-sponsor was Representative Barbara
Lee, and at a certain point, this Space Preservation Act that was just introduced was brought to the UN
and the Space Preservation Treaty was linked with it. And actually the UN had previously addressedset
upestablished, I guess the basis for this treaty by saying they wanted a permanent ban on spaced-based
weapons that passed in the United Nations that passed 156 to 0. Then Burkley supported the 2002 the
Space Preservation Act and I believe also, the Space Preservation Treaty.
So thats what Council Member Beckles is referring to in terms of the resolution that shes brought
forward. I dont know how anyone can not support not having weapons in space when it has been
supported by the UN and also been supported, clearly stated by many experts that its infeasible this
original Ronald Reagan plan to dub this Star Wars.
I think the resolution is fine as it is. It basically says that the residentsthe well-being of our residents is
of importance to us and it also, it doesnt state pro or con in terms of what individuals are saying. But it
just refers to the fact that our residents deserve to be protected. And in general it states that spacedbased weapons are something that the city of Richmond does not support. (applause)
Mayor: Okay, so would you call the public speakers?
Anderson:

Speakers are Amy Anderson, Jesse Beltrand, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Edward Spencer, Ben

Colonson, Lisa Becker and Derrick Robinson.


Beckles: Amy Lee Anderson.
Anderson:

Yes

Mayor: Could you come over here to the podium to speak, please?
Anderson: Good evening Council Members, Council Beckles. I really want to thank you for not deviating
your plan because I went on your Facebook and I saw why you came in office and you never deviated your
plan. You said that you wanted to first put the community first and from you doing that, I want to thank

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
216
88of
8of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page217
9 ofof183
336
you first. And secondly, as a psychologist, a child psychologist, I want to thank you for putting up with
some of those pains I have suffered along this way. But I am here in happiness, in a moment of greatness.
I have a perfect city. Nowhere in the United States, no targeted individual can get this kind of support
that I have gotten. We just needed just one person, one city. And because of that, you all are our heroes,
and we want to thank you. And I can go on and say much much.
But we are dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has no
experience to fathom it. It is so sophisticated. So what we are saying to you all is please let us help you
understand enough, as someone outside looking in to our lives. Because were in pain, we are tortured
and we are humiliated every day in our lives because our lives have taken on a path. We dont even know
how or why we have this type of people on this planet who would harm in this type of way. And I just want
to thank you all. And you, Mayor, for you being in the cityworking in the service. Being in the service. For
others to do this, I know that should sadden you. (applause)
Jesse Beltran Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor and City Council Members. My name is Jesse Beltrand.
Im the president of the International Center Against the Use of Covert Technologies. Our organization was
formed in 2010 in Sacramento California for the purpose to bring awareness to the general public and
legal systems around the world about serious human rights abuses with regards to the utilization of
remote influencing technologies. My colleagues and co-speakers today, hopefully well get John Hall, who
was the author of Guinea Pigs, Technologies of Control, which have been sent to each of you and signed. I
also have Dr. Edward Spencer, whos a Neurologist from the Yale School of Medicine and Ben Colonson who
is a PHD in psychology, and therapist, and co-author of a book about PTSD. I myself am a retired
Sacramento City Fire Paramedic and a recent graduate of HMI and do provide therapy to victims.
In 2010 I met Dr. Hall and when meeting him I discovered this phenomenon and asked, Why isnt
anything being done about this? He said its because of the symptomology. If everyone went to traditional
medicine and complained about what they were experiencing, they would be railroaded into the mental
health institutions. The fact of the matter is, this is affecting all demographics of society: the poor, the
rich, the elite. I see victims on a monthly basis and hear from hundreds of people every week. I currently
have over 23,000 correspondences from victims not only within, here in the United States, but around the
world.
What we have discovered is that there are hot pockets within the United States where there are victims
that are being exposed to these types of technologies. And as our speakers continue to speak they will
explain to you how that has developed. Currently the hot spots are New York, Florida, Chicago, Texas, and
California. Unfortunately, in California, the East Bay has the highest amount of victims that we have
collected in our database, within our study within our organization. This is why we are currently here
today.
Beckles Your time has expired Sir.

Beltran Okay, thank you.

Beckles Dr. John Hall. Dr. John Hall.

Beltran Dr. Hall is unable to be reached so were going to have Dr. Spencer here.
Spencer:

Mr. Mayor, City Council, thank you. Thank you for attacking this very difficult problem. And

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
217
99of
9of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page218
10 of
of183
336
there are a lot of people around the world, especially in Europe, where I attended a counsel just recently,
in November, who thank you. Im a retired neurologist. I attended Stanford University, Yale University and
a residency at the University of California in San Francisco.
Ive studied this sort of problem for a period of time. And its been a mystery to me why medicine in
general does not approach this and study the multitude of documents that are out there. But this is the
case. And I wont answer this for you, because this is an ongoing study, ongoing problem. This is really
intense technology. Essentially what might be described as EEG heterodyning. The entire electrical activity
of the human brain can be captured in this super computer and certainly processed and then put back into
someone else. Imits science fiction. But unfortunately, its not science fiction. So naturally this is
difficult. So the technology is incredible. But basically this is a moral problem. Ethical problem. This is a
violation of the golden rule, any ethics, anything thats decent. And this is a major thing to consider. Its
also a violation of our constitutional rights. So thats an important thing to keep in mind.
To bring it back down to Richmond, I know there are a lot of targeted individuals here, and the police
encounter them. And cant understand this and help them. The medical community is hobbled by not
having a differential diagnosis. And many of the psychiatric disorders, they should say rule out
psychotronic disorders, but they dont. So they cant face it at all. Thank you.
Beckles Ben Colonson

Colonson I thank you all. Two minutes. Okay, lets go. Thank you all for your endurance. I see you listen
to a lot of humans. Im gonna talk really fast with two minutes to go. I am a psychologist. I have
evaluated many targeted individuals who have previously been diagnosed as delusional and psychotic and
my job is to deconstruct those diagnoses. Because of the methods of my colleagues that can actually
detect advanced nano-technology present in their bodies both through frequency emissions and
lymphaticbasicallylike when you fire a bullet theres a trajectory and the police can determine the
trajectory. There are chemical tests to do that. I was just gonna, very quickly, since its two minutes, this
is this months issue of Smithsonian Magazine that says, The Future is Here: Brain to Brain
Communication is Real. Targeted Individuals report synthetic telepathy, voices in their skull, people
putting thoughts in their head, things that up until now weve been told are complete delusion and lock
em up. But you know, the capabilities exist.
This is the National Nanotech Initiative. The last 15 years budgets of a billion and a half dollars just by the
federal governments non-black budgets. We dont know what they spend on the black budgets. Doing
experimental programs showing how nano sensors in people can give us much more data about humanity.
These technologies can be used for great good but they have apparently also been used for tremendous
evil in non-consensual human experimentation. There is great documentation on this.
I do think its a little unfortunate, that confusion about the Space Preservation Act. There arethe systems
SCADAS, theyre called. The acronym stands for Supervisory Control And Data Systems Systems. They
include a component of satellite communication from a central command post as well as components
inside the human beings, or targeted individuals. So although there is a component of these weapons
systems, and they are clearly weapons systems by the major nations on earth, theres an arms race on for
the mind at this time. Control of the human mind. The Human Brain Initiative is part of it. If I only have

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
218
10
10
10
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page219
11 of
of183
336
two minutes I have to stop there. I hope you will listen to these people. They are suffering greatly as nonconsensual experimentees.
Beckles A question, really quick, to the speaker. Could you repeat the names of those two references
that you gave, the magazines? Can you give me the names of those again, please?
Colonson The first one, the current issue of the Smithsonian Magazine. A main stream magazine, which
in this months issue, says communicating brain to brain. And this is merely what they are releasing
publicly. The majority of the most advanced weapons systems are classified and we dont know the full
capabilities. This is just the supplemental to the presidents budget, this years Nanotechnology Initiative.
And what I didnt get to say in my two minutes is the National Registry of Environmental Professionals,
which certifies people to do all kinds of environmental quality testing, has just certified SCADAS,
Supervisory Control And Data Administration Systems, as something that needs to be studied for its
environmental impact on the environment in general. And I am part of the HSCADAS task force, how
these SCADAS systems are impacting human beings. And there are thousands of reports from targeted
individuals that crimes are being committed against them. And my intention in coming here tonight was to
support their claims so that law enforcement, with as much
Mayor I think she asked you the names of the magazinesso
Beckles: Thank you very much. Lisa Becker.
Becker: Hi. Good evening. My name is Lisa Becker and I came here from Racine, Wisconsin. I have been
a victim of this technology for 14 years. I have been tortured for 14 years. My justice department has
failed me. My executive branch has failed me. My senators have failed me. My congressmen have failed
me. You are the only people in this country who have had the courage to even put this on the agenda.
Thats why I flew all this way to thank you, and to address you. This is torture. And it is enslavement. And
any one of these people can tell you the same thing. We have suffered desperately. And Im sorry if Im
emotional. But Im very tired. But if you wont save us, save yourselves. Because I promise you, this will
come back to every one of you. Every one of us in this country are going to be tapped into these computer
systems and you are gonna see what this feels like. Do something now while you still can. Thank you.
Council Member I have a question. Could you be more specific in terms of how you feel that youve
beenthe injustice.
Becker You mean in terms of the justice department failing me?
Council Member Well in terms of your being a victim.
Becker You mean in what Im feeling?

Council Member Yeah, explain a little bit to me how you perceive yourself as being.
Becker

Sure, well I have actual photographs of burns on my body. When I went to my doctor, the

response was, Well how do I know you didnt do that to yourself? How do you address that? Ive passed
two psychological evaluations. Not one but two. The one physician said, Youre sound as a bell. I have no
idea whats going on with you. When I go to sleep, when I go to try to sleep, I feel like Im being lit up
like a Christmas tree. I feel like every cell in my body just bouncing out of my body. I cant even describe
it. I get electric shock up my rectum. I get electric shock up my nose. Ive woken up with burns on the
end of my tongue. Ive had burns on the palms of both my hands. I vibrate. I vibrate. I can barely hold a
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
219
11
11
11
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page220
12 of
of183
336
piece of paper without quivering. Does that answer your question?
Council Member Im trying to find out whats the source.
Becker

The source are these exotic weapons. They talk about, in 2977, they talk about the space

weapons, spaced-based weapons. Basically in that document they talk about exotic weapons. Thats what
were talking about. And the fact of the matter is they did complete that global surveillance network. My
cousin worked for the defense department. She worked on the global mapping of that system. And when I
told her what I was going through, all she could say was, Youre on your own. Well, I figured that out. I
figured that out. If you would please, I urge you to pass this. I realize you cant enforce it, but if you
would pass it, it might give other communities the courage to do the same thing and show our defense
department we are not the enemy. We are not to be attacked. We are not terrorists. Most of us are
defenseless women.
Mayor Okay, thank you.
Becker Thank you.

Beckles

Our next speaker is Derrick Robinson, followed by Laquisha Baker, Dolores Hall, Kim, Alex,

Elizabeth Adams, Robert Swegan. Please come forward. Derrick Robinson.


Robinson Good evening everyone. Im Derrick Robinson. In regards to the Space Preservation Act that
is before you, many of us have travelled here to say thanks very much for listening and responding to so
many that have come to you over the past couple of years. This is a momentous occasion for our
organization and for humanity. You are one of the very few governing authorities that has considered the
danger of psychotonic technologies. Research in this area has been ongoing since the 50s by government
agencies, corporations, criminal elements, and religious cults, etc. But, only since the arrival of the
internet, has this holocaust been made known to thousands of people who have found that they are
victims of psychotonic technologies. And that they have been sereptisciously victimized by them. And as
the devices proliferate and the public becomes more aware of these covert activities, legislation on a local
and national level will be needed to address the concerns with regard to a vulnerable society. Your
resolution today would be a giant step forward in ensuring the health, safety and well-being for all people.
Thank you.
Beckles Laquisha Baker
Baker:

Hello to all the legislators, and city hall, Javanka, my girl Amy over there. I have been a

Richmond resident 40 plus years. Ive seen two of my friends try and fight this fight. But their minds are
gone and theres no coming back. My mother was a Black Panther. They killed her. She was only 58 years
old. And Im just happy at this moment that somebody in our town, our city, has opened the doors for
many people who couldnt make it, didnt make it, and were survivors of it. And I just want to say thank
you.
Beckles: Dolores Hall.
Hall: I did not know you were going to call me to speak. But I will share. I head up the Los Angeles
Freedom from Covert Harassment Group. Its a support group. And I have about 300 people that is in that
group. And I get over 400 emails on a weekly basis of people asking me to help them, begging me, please
help. No one will listen to me. I am 65 years old and as I walk here, up to this podium, Im in so much
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
220
12
12
12
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page221
13 of
of183
336
pain. I have burns all over my body. Theymy doctor I had treated with for 16 years, my legs swelled up
from the electric magnetic frequencies hitting me on my legshe told me to go to the hospital. And when I
went to the hospital they were supposed to put an IV in me. They sent me to the mental ward because
they said I did this to myself. I would never hurt me. I have been a victim since 2007. You cant see this
horrific electric hitting you. Electric is invisible. You take a remote control to turn your tv, turn on your
television. It hurts so bad. I want to thank you for opening your minds and your time today. I am a retired
legal investigator. I have asked all my friends, I have very prominent friends, to help me. They cant do
anything about this. It is way, way over our heads. They say its the shadow government. It is people that
cannot be touched. Please help us.
Beckles Kim, next speaker.
Buckner: Hello, my name is Kimberly Buckner and I have been a targeted individual for a very long time.
The things that Ive experienced due to being targeted, they have been unreal. However, I can attest that
they are very real indeed. My life has been destroyed in every possible way and every day has been a
struggle for me. I am very grateful to be before you today due to Amy Andersons due diligence and to
everyone else involved. I thank you council members for giving us targeted individuals a chance to speak
and to be heard. And I pray that these atrocities will soon be brought to an end. But we need your help.
Thank you.
Beckles: Alex
Rafter: Good evening, my name is Alec Rafter. I am an NYU graduate and have spent much of my time
working in a financial holding company in San Francisco. I have been a targeted individual for eight years
six months. Im from Lafayette, California, which is in this county. I am here to support and corroborate
what these other speakers are trying to convey. This technology exists and is being used on a mass scale.
It is torturous, brutal and inhumane. It happens everywhere I go. People dont understand the capabilities
of this technology. The person I came with here tonight was being shocked and stabbed in this very room
with a directed energy weapon while waiting to speak with the council. My ears are getting frequency
tinnitus while I was sitting here waiting for you as well as technology called voice to skull Dr. Alan Frey.
Like I said, this happens everywhere I go in Northern and Southern California. Ive been tortured all day,
all night, minute after minute, year after year after year. We need your help and support to stop this, to
save us, and to prevent this from happening to others. Please support banning these so called spacedbased weapons. Thank you very much.
Beckles: Robert Swegan
Swegan: Good evening. My name is Robert Swegan. I live in Modesto California. Im here tonight after
being targeted for 12 years with direct energy weapons, voice to skull. I wake up in the middle of the
night in excruciating pain. Theres nobody I can call. Theres nobody to help me. You know, sometimes I
have suicidal idealization because theres no one to help. You know, Ive been diagnosed schizophrenic,
delusional, at 53 and 57 years old. Im a graduate of junior college with a degree in counseling and human
service. I commend you people for what youre doing here. I want toIm here to support my friends. And
I know this has been very difficult for me and my family. My familyI have 4 children. One is in prison

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
221
13
13
13
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page222
14 of
of183
336
right now. I suspect he was here for about 45 minutes. And others will not even talk to me. My familys
been fragmented. I dont tell anybody whats happening to me anymore. Its a dark secret with me. I
cannot explain to people whats happening. The police in Modesto are at least talking to me now. Theyre
not taking me down to the mental health facility. I thank you very much for listening to me.
Beckles
Marilyn Languist
Languist:

Good evening Mayor and Council Members. Marilyn Languist, Richmond resident. I want to

thank Ms Anderson for bringing this topic forward and for bringing so many speakers. I urge you to adopt
this resolution. As has been said, the original Space Preservation Act was originally introduced by
Congressman Cosenich, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Congressman Pete Stark of the
Bay Area. And this concept was also voted on and supported unanimously by the United Nations to
prohibit weaponization of space and spaced-based weapons. These are clearly not good for anyone on
earth and not good for anyone in Richmond. You have to be aware that there are a lot of exotic weapons
research programs going on. Some of them covert, some of them not covert. A former Richmond resident
sent me a lot of emails last year about a public comment period for allowing US military testing of directed
energy weapons in the Olympic peninsula in the state of Washington, which is of great concern. In terms
of the types of weapons that are affecting these individuals, before you judge the targeted individuals, I
would suggest that you listen to them, take the time to really listen deeply to their experience. Try to put
yourself in their shoes for a moment. If you can believe them, then please do what you can to support
them. If youre not sure, then I urge you to take the precautionary principle, when in doubt error on the
side of extra protection for those who are vulnerable. So please do adopt this resolution. Thank you.
Beckles: Sylvia Gray White
White: Good evening. My name is Sylvia Gray White, a very long time Richmond resident. Tonight Im so
thankful and happy that our city is looking up, waking up and standing up. Approval of this agenda item
will make an impact on the whole world and will help us to restore our mother earth and our health. The
heavy metal toxins falling down on us daily from the chem trails are done by our military without our
approval and knowledge. Lead is one of the many chemicals in the chem trails even though our
government banned it decades ago. Banned it from paint, toys, even bullets, and other manufacturing
processes. This toxin has really negatively impacted my life. Lead is very toxic and there are no safe
levels. It displaces the calcium in your bones among many other illnesses, particularly with children. The
level of lead in my body has drastically increased in the past 3 years. Ive gotta get the lead out. We need
to stop this constant daily abuse of our universal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you
cant feel good, you cant live good. I am not the only one breathing this pollution. If you breathe, youre
breathing it too. We have rights. Stand up for them! Now in order to stand Ive got to use a cane. But I
still can stand and will stand up for whats right.
Beckles: Our last speaker is Elizabeth Adams.
Adams: First and foremost Id like to pass this cell phone around. This is what electronic burns look like.
This is my 6 year old grand-daughter who has been targeted since birth. So can I just walk around and
show this to you?

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
222
14
14
14
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page223
15 of
of183
336
Mayor Give it to the clerk.

Adams This was taken less than 30 days ago at Eden hospital. Thats when you hear of the victim speak
of being electronically burned. That is my 6 year old grand-daughter. I am 59 years old. I have 6
grandchildren and 2 great grand- children. I first and foremost want to say that I thank God for every one
of you. And I mean literally from the bottom of my heart. I thank him for each one of you and I thank him
for the blessings that hes gonna bring your way just for addressing these issues. These issues are beyond
the average eye. The average eye cant even see it. So its not even worth even talking about in that
sense. I have sent each and every one of you information. Everything that I sent you is just what you
need to know. But theres one more thing left:

your local fusion center. You need to do some deep

research into your local fusion center. Just look it up on line. That is where you will find information, ill
activities of some sort, that is going on withinIm not going to say city government because I cant
pinpoint it. But you need to look into your local fusion center. Secondly, mental health of children(timer
beeping).May I finish just two minutes please?
Mayor No, I think we need to give everybody the same amount of time. Thank you.
Adams Okay, no problem.
Beckles That was the last speaker.
Mayor: (lady asked to speak) Maam, you know, if you didnt sign up you cant speak. Okay, I have Vice
Mayor Meyers.
Vice Mayor

I was just gonna briefly say that the weaponization of space as the history that was so

eloquently described by Council Member McLaughlin is something that I think is extremely immoral and we
should not be, as a nation, engaging in and so Im gonna support this resolution based on that.
Mayor Do we have any other speakers? Okay, hearing none, do we have a motion?

Beckles I can make a motion. I share that we adopt the resolution thats put before us.

Mayor Motion of second?

Beckles Pinplay has something

Mayor Oh, Councilman Pinplay


Pinplay:

I just want to address for a second this whole idea about weaponization of space and there

seems to be this assumption that just because Ronald Reagan supported Star Wars, its automatically
become some unmitigated evil. The context in which it was considered a problem was simply because
there was this perception that Star Wars or any kind of strategic defense initiative could not be made
foolproof. And it could not be made foolproof because the opponent, particularly a very well-armed
opponent like the Soviet Union could launch like tens of thousands of dummy missiles at any one point
and so it would be almost impossible to intercept all of them and to distinguish the nuclear missiles from
the dummy missiles. And the understanding was that it would be that there could be a problem created
because based on the overestimation of the effectiveness of Star Wars, namely that America might think
that it was too effective and therefore, go for a first strike and knock out all the Soviet weapons. Or, on
the other hand, the Soviets might feel it was too effective and go for a preemptive strike beforehand. And
it was only in that specific cold war context that Star Wars was considered a horrible idea. Actually, Star
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
223
15
15
15
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page224
16 of
of183
336
Wars is not a particularly bad idea, the whole idea is that you can knock out someones weapons before
they enter your air space, in fact, long before they enter your air space. And this, for example, was
practiced more than 20 years ago, in the Gulf War, when the Patriot system modification of this was used
when the Patriot system knocked out some of the Iraqi missiles that were launched at Israel. And it is not
just a perfectly valid system, it is actually a particularly useful system, in the time that we have now
where there are nations that are not quite as well armed as the Soviet Union used to be in the 1980s.
Which may not have the capability to launch tremendous numbers of missiles at any one time. And, in
fact, this is a fairly useful system to have. And so this automatic knee jerk reaction that because Reagan
supported Star Wars and at the time it was considered a bad idea and so for that purpose it is considered
a bad idea forever, I just think this is a wrong understanding of the system. And I just wanted to mention
that.
Mayor So we have Council Member McLaughlin next.
McLaughlin: So, I justthe reason I was interrupting because I dont think we should get into it. Thats
kind of way off base. I was just giving the history of this in general. I will say that there were some of us
in the 80s that were talking about a nuclear freeze like to stop the arms war rather than weapons in
space. You know, I think space should be for exploration and good things to learn, scientifically. Not for a
weapons trace.
Mayor: Wait, no, were not having anything from the audience. Council Member Martinez.
Martinez: Yes, just last week on 60 Minutes there was a special on the reintroduction to the arms war,
with people trying to develop missiles to take out communication satellites. But any kind of war effort is
wrong. And we need to do whatever we can to stop all war efforts. Now when I was in university in the
1980s for humanities class, I did a paper on a science fiction novel. What I actually did was, I took all of
the predictions in this science fiction novel, and then I went to magazines and newspapers, and I was
surprised to find that every single prediction in this science fiction novel, that was written 20 years earlier,
had already come true. And they were happening there, then, in 1980. So its easy for me to see that
things which are wrong can happen because we have the wrong mindset. We have the mindset which is a
war mindset and this proposition that was put forth by Cosenich was to change our attitudes towards one
of seeking peace, and thats why Im endorsing it.
Mayor: Okay, Vice Mayor.
Vice Mayor: Well, I want to say that I do think this debate is, it is on topic, because the debate on Star
Wars is sort of, was part of what initiated this. And what I would say, and its been said, that any sort of
in my viewthe idea that we dont have enough tools to kill each other here on earth and so that we need
to start doing it in space, that just is simply immoral. And you know, it may be that some wars are
unavoidable. That may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country to move away from that mind
set and move away from utilizing new methods of war, we should support. And so thats why I support this
resolution.
Mayor: Okay, if theres nobody else, lets vote. Wait. Council Member Pinplay.
Pinplay: So the motion before us, does that include things like chem trails and stuff, or no?

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
224
16
16
16
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page225
17 of
of183
336
Mayor Well, let me, I think hes bringing up a good point, because, Im really confused. I think that the
resolution itself is very simple. It simply says, the city of Richmond thereby supports the Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty to ensure that individuals will not be targets of
spaced-based weapons. So I see that. All the testimony Ive heard tonight is about targeted individuals.
And so, I mean, Im confused. Is this about spaced-based weapons or is it about targeted individuals? And
if individuals are targeted, whos targeting them and why? I just dont understand it.
Beckles Its simple enough. Its saying that, on the thereforeas you read, we are supporting this Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty and the reason were doing this is that
individuals will not be targets of spaced-based weapons, which is what theyre saying. All this stuff is high
technology, itsand sothats what were adopting here. And you know, whether you believe it or not, one
thing that was very clear, and Ive met with folks a lot around this issue, and some of them Im just
hearing tonight. And even the ones I heard tonight, just out of compassion for folks that are saying help
us, and us supporting this, by adopting this resolution, I think it sends out a message that, you know, we
sympathize with you, we support you, and the very least we can do is just pass this resolution to make
sure that you feel the support and love and sympathy that you deserve. Its simple, it reads right there
Mayor. Thats all were trying to pass. Whats there before you. Thats all were trying to pass. Dont
complicate it. Its simple, so vote it yes or no.
Mayor I sympathize with everyone who is suffering some kind of affliction. But on the other hand, you
know, in 1967, the US adopted, or the President signed the treaty on the principles guarding the activities
of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies. So the
US government has acted on this, and they have, within that particular treaty, is a ban on using outer
space for military purposes. So, I just dont understand what were talking about. Are we talking about the
weaponization of space? Are we talking about chem trails? Are we talking about individuals who are being
targeted? If so, by whom and why? I mean, you know, Im just a dumb city council person and this is way,
way over my head. And I frankly think that its sort of way out of the purview of what this city council
could be taking up.
Weve got real problems here. Weve got potholed roads, weve got a budget thats out of balance, weve
got crime, weve got greenhouse gases. Weve got all these things to worry about and here Im being
asked to support a resolution that deals with things like chem trails and particle beams and plasmas and
mind control technologies. I just dont know enough about it. If I were an expert Id probably take a side,
but Im not. And so for that reason Im just not gonna support it. Maybe some time Ill learn more and be
more oriented
Beckles Id like to call the questions.

Mayor Council Member Bates

Bates Well, it is confusing. Im gonna support the resolution for the simple reason that weve voted on

lot of dumber ideas than this resolution represents. And again, we know that we dont control the
universe, we dont control Congress. So this is the least of my worries. So, Im gonna support it. Now call
for the questions.
Mayor Does anybody else want to talk about it? Okay, lets just vote.
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
225
17
17
17
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page226
18 of
of183
336
Beckles Council Member Pinplay? No. The motion passes 5-2 with Council Member Pinplay voting no,
and Mayor Butt voting no.
Bates One reason I voted for it was there wasnt one speaker in opposition of it.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
226
18
18
18
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based wea...

1 of 1

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolutio...

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page227
19 of
of183
336

Facebook

Twitter

More

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
227
19
19
19
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016
6/5/2016 6:44 AM

1 of 1

http://www.eastbaytimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article....

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page228
20 of
of183
336

Richmond: Space weapons resolution prompts requests to


investigate
By Karina Ioffee kioffee@bayareanewsgroup.com
East Bay Times
Posted:Mon Jun 01 18:42:20 MDT 2015

RICHMOND -- A city resolution banning space weapons within city limits has prompted dozens of calls to the Richmond Police
Department in recent days to ask the agency to investigate the alleged use of chips, bugs and other devices for mind and body
control.
On May 19, the City Council approved a resolution supporting the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning "space-based weapons," such as microchips planted in people's bodies and micro waves that supporters
believe are used by nefarious sources to harm them.
The resolution was written by Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles, who works as a mental health specialist for Contra Costa County,
and aimed at "making all Richmond residents feel safe," she said.
"I don't intend to ignore the concerns from residents who say they have been exposed to these attacks that have caused them great
emotional and bodily harm," Beckles said.
The fallout has prompted worries that Richmond, which is working hard to remold its image in recent years, will be dismissed as
slightly off by the news media and other municipalities.
" I am trying to figure out how we can use this newfound fame to help market Richmond, much as desolate eastern Nevada has
used the Extraterrestrial Highway to lure tourists to an otherwise deserted stretch of desert highway," joked Richmond Mayor Tom
Butt in a recent online posting.
But the issue actually started last June, when Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan was asked by Beckles to meet with residents who
said they were being targeted by space technology. Eager to show the department was sensitive to residents' concerns, Gagan
agreed.
"My desire was how to better serve this population from a public safety standpoint," said Gagan, a 20-year veteran with the
department. "There are people who have a huge amount of stress, anxiety and fear. These issues have public safety implications
no matter how far-fetched they seem."
The meeting had the best of intentions. But it appears to have also motivated conspiracy theorists who began to see the city as an
ally. Gagan began receiving invitations to speak at conferences organized by the "targeted individuals" community, and a rumor
started that the city had a task force devoted to uncovering government conspiracies. One organization even gave Gagan a
"humanitarian award" for his work on the issue.
"People were thrilled that someone was finally listening to them," Gagan said.
Since that meeting, he estimates that he's received more than 100 calls from people from as far away as Ireland who say they want
Richmond police to investigate their particular situations. Gagan always takes the time to explain that the department looks at facts
and has so far found no evidence to support concerns raised by callers.
"We try to refocus the conversation, and if they are local, get them into a managed program of medication and supervision," Gagan
said.
Contact Karina Ioffee at 510-262-2726 or kioffee@bayareanewsgroup.com. Follow her at Twitter.com/kioffee

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
228
20
20
20
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016
6/5/2016 6:47 AM

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page229
21 of
of183
336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom From

Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

CORROBORATING EXPERT AND FORMER NSA WHISTLEBLOWER


KAREN STEWART
DISCLOSURE OF ELECTROGAGNETIC WEAPONS USED TO KILL CERTAIN
TARGETED INDIVIDUALS DURING APRIL 10, 2016 RADIO INTERVIEW

THE DISCLOSURE
Karen Stewart graduated from Florida State University in 1979 with a BS degree in German Language
and a minor or co-major equivalent in Fine Art. She worked for NSA (National Security Agency) from
1982 to 2010. Her resume will follow.

Her video interviews can be seen on the following YOUTUBE links:

Wheel of Freedom (WUA) 4/4/16 Ex-NSA Karen Stewart


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10

NSA whistle blower Karen Stewart exposes targeted Individuals, 9/11


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMg
On March 9, 2016 I was detained and falsely imprisoned by no less than 8 NSA Security Police

on the barracks of the Headquarters of the NSA at Ft. Meade Maryland.

I was handcuffed, and

interrogated for over an hour, while my car was dog sniffed and searched. I was ordered to return to
Lancaster rather than continue on to Washington, D.C., and was ordered not to enter any federally
owned property again. The following is a video of my statement:
Statement and Video of False Imprisonment re Handcuffed and Interrogation for an hour at NSA

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
229
21
21
21
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page230
22 of
of183
336

Headquarters (National Security Agency at Ft. Meade, Maryland) by 8 NSA Police officers on March 9,
2015 Recorded on March 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhs
Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: I Worked various projects over the years, not
just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances,
weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron
Curtain

and

changing

relations

among

newly

liberated

countries,

economic

and

diplomatic

developments of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in
support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from
wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned
why my work was used to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited
with my work .
The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal
electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the article
titled NSA Whistleblowor Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light and can be found at:
http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-intothe-light

The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is
as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to
that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower
has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to
write her story.

KAREN STEWART'S TRANSCRIPT


First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a righteous lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
230
22
22
22
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page231
23 of
of183
336

infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.
All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from
the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photostalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and
NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon
County Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had
personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of
Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking
harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval
Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially
stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security
personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of
the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of
civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as
to why the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious
questions about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group
eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may
add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning
multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home
overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA
also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be
anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
231
23
23
23
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page232
24 of
of183
336

monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to
facilitate car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not
assigned to me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to
report my location and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle
to someone about what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the
children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going
for the usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit!
But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run,
purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the PETTITIONER on May 9,
2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and botching the placement/removal of
a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic
would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before my appointment). I
even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular internet
site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that
the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be
decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to recover
my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009 I had
researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing phenomenon, but when
electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered
about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does exist and
is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons emit
multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio
frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I understand yet. Now, with the
help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now
with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time,
cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect
stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.
At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted
by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
232
24
24
24
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page233
25 of
of183
336

to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like
good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department
are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when
I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or
one of my family is dead. They cant quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and
nothing protects the police or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by
criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in
Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade
with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand
and may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in
Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they
say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of
simply settling for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they
can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with itincluding any leader or
politician.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
233
25
25
25
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page234
26 of
of183
336

There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths

EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its


Corruption Karen Stewart

By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives

February 20, 2014

3 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

At the very least, for the past few months to a year it has become increasingly evident thatalthough
not allmany agencies of the US Federal government have become increasingly dirty, perverse and
corrupt and require a deep and thorough cleaning.
The US Secret Service has previously been exposed as including claims of involvement with
prostitutes, leaking sensitive information, publishing pornography, sexual assault, illegal wiretaps,
improper use of weapons and drunken behavior and the IRS was caught and admitted to denying
Obamas political enemies (aka TEA Party, Christians, religious Jews, conservatives) their Constitutional
rights while allowing progressive groups (aka Liberals, Leftists, Marxists, Maoists, Socialists,
Communists) theirs. Andlove him, hate him or fall somewhere in-betweenEdward Snowden shone a
very bright light on the unconstitutional domestic mega-spying of one of these clandestine agencies
the National Security Agency. Thus far, under Obamas increasingly iron rule, few-to-no members of
these agencies have even been indicted by Congress for their blatant crimes against the American
people.
The NSA appears to have begun as a patriotic organization that was geared toward protecting the USA
and its citizens. Whether or not that was its original intended purpose is a subject for discussion and
speculation. However, portions of the NSA seem to have devolved into something very sinister. Todays
interview will concentrate on this agency.

NSA Analyst. Due to a number of substantive reasons, this former Analysts identity cannot be divulged
at this time and will be referred to as W. I have, however, confirmed this individuals prior employment
and credentials via a well-known NSA Whistleblower. The information disseminated to me, amongst
other things tells a sordid story of corruption and how employees are silenced into submissionvia fear
within the agency,

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
234
26
26
26
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page235
27 of
of183
336

The Interview
Sher:Thanks so much for being with me, today, in order to provide essential additional information to
the public on how many of their tax dollars are really being spent. You were employed by the NSA for
over two decades. Would you tell the readers what initially attracted you to the agency as well as how it
has deteriorated over time?

Karen Stewart: Like many people from families with a strong history of serving our country, coming
out of college, I looked to find a way to best utilize my particular interests and talents in service to my
fellow Americans. The mission of the NSA it seemed to me, was to stop threats coming to our shores.
Its charter clearly targeted foreign nationals on foreign soil who did or could intend us harm. That
appealed to me as a righteous endeavor and honorable tack for my life to take.
Sher: Youve shared with me how the NSA deals with its employees who bring legitimate complaints to
their superiors. How thoroughly intimidating and threatening are their behaviors toward those who balk
at their adverse treatment? Would you give a few examples?

Karen Stewart: Apparently the nature of NSA Security degenerated under General Michael Hayden,
the previous Director of NSA (DIRNSA), who promoted a very questionable mid-level Security manager
to a power position within Security. Hayden had originally been tasked to eviscerate NSA since a very
shallow and short-sighted Congress believed that the fall of the Iron Curtain meant no danger existed
anywhere anymore that required the existence of a robust NSA presence. There evolved, under him, a
gratuitously vicious bully mindset that employees were to be intimidated at any opportunity not only to
drive them out of NSA but to cut back on people reporting problems that made NSA look bad, especially
problems involving upper management.
Under Hayden and his successor, General Keith Alexander, the filing of complaints to or requests for
investigations by the NSA EEO or the OIG (Office of the Inspector General) were often inexplicably
blown off despite adequate evidence or the presence of willing witnesses. Then the person who had
filed the complaint would be subjected to an out of cycle reinvestigation interview with Security as
well as polygraph exam, wherein the tone of the Security person was not neutralas it should bebut,
hostile with far-fetched or even ridiculous non-issues presented as potentially problematic. This was a
Security shot across the bow to warn the person that he had crossed the line by filing the complaint. If
he pursued the complaint, Security would lean on his managers to heavily discourage him from doing
what he thought was proper and was indeed a protected action under the law. If he persisted, did his
own amateur investigation, or told coworkers about the situation, he might be called down to Security
multiple times and accused of being paranoid and delusional based on his complaint, and his job
threatened.
The worse the infraction reported, especially if a high level manager looked to be involved, the more

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
235
27
27
27
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page236
28 of
of183
336

severe the reaction by Security. In cases of egregious wrong-doing by a manager, Security would
review the personnel files, medical files, and financial statements to find anything they could use to
threaten or blackmail him with, or pretend to misinterpret some tidbit of information as something it
was not.
Some people were forced to sign admissions of guilt of preposterous misinterpretations of facts in order
to keep their jobs, thereby killing their credibility and complaint. When nothing was found in such files
that could be used, a false accusation of espionage or leaking classified materials ginned up by Security,
was used to justify a Security intrusion into the persons home to search for blackmail material, further
assess the interests and personality of the targeted individual (TI), and plant bugs and abscond with an
extra set of keys for further intrusions. The more the person objected to being bullied, the more heavyhanded Security became, insisting that hostility toward them indicated wrong-doing on the TIs part.
Thus the TI would become harried and harassed for a crime he never committed, if it ever
even was committed, and to repeated accusations by Security Psych services of a nonexistent mental illness, more than adequately supported by years of internal, psychological
evaluations stating he was mentally sound (Paranoia with delusions is rare and certainly
never occurs overnight, but that does not deter a Security psychologist attack dog, whose
favorite mode of attack employs reference to this malady).
The more a person stood his ground, the more personal it became to Security, which then
became dedicated to the personal destruction of the TI. Under the pretext of the fake
accusation of espionage or leaking classified information, Security would slander the
individual with his coworkers, work friends and managers to isolate him and apply yet more
pressure. Many backed away from supporting the TI in fear for their careers and maybe even
freedom. Certainly this sent a message to the workforce in the TIs area that NSA Security
was at its essence, a rogue, unaccountable and psychotic entity that was to be greatly
feared.
Once NSA Security had decided upon the removal of the TI for failing to be sufficiently
cowed, then false evidence was given to the FBI liaisons assigned to NSA. This would
engender a fraudulent FISA warrant, which loosed FBI surveillance and investigators upon
the person for a few weeks or months, further slandering him to his work and social circles
and thereby putting pressure on him by their constant presence. When the FBI would find no
basis for the accusation, they would drop the case and move on. However, at that point,
Security would send in their own personnel sans warrant, to overtly stalk and harass the TI ,
24/7.

In some instances, Security has even gone into the persons


neighborhood to recruit snitches and augment harassment with

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
236
28
28
28
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page237
29 of
of183
336

hostile civilians convinced the TI is an enemy of the state, based


on baseless Security slander.
Intrusions would be made into his home to remove gathered evidence or
move things around as a psychological ploy and his car would be secretly
GPSd to facilitate vehicular stalking and aggressive driving games. There
have even been reports of pet murders by poisoning as an escalation of the
harassment with the inferred threat that perhaps it could be the TIs child or
himself next. The harassment is essentially elevated until the TI either
breaks and assaults a harasser or complains to Security about the insane
and sadistic, not to mention criminal way in which he is being mistreated.
This is what Security planned for and is ready to jump on as their
springboard to terminating his employment.
His security clearance is immediately pulled, he is warehoused in a menial job until adequate paperwork
and a back-story can be fabricated or forged to falsely present a termination due to mental instability or
illness, and the person is fired. Of course there is an appeals process, but it is thoroughly corrupted. No
matter how much evidence supports the victim and how little supports NSA, NSA always wins these
cases where it is clear the person was targeted for dismissal. Of course, this does nothing but embolden
more degenerate or criminal behavior while making it clear that the person reporting evil will be
considered the problem, and that in reality no labor laws or whistle protection laws can actually protect
an NSA employee, because real watch dog entities dont exist within NSA and state and Federal
authorities routinely turn a blind eye to the reported abuses even as they become more criminal and
seditious.
I shake my head at sycophant, disingenuous politicians who claim Edward Snowden could have or
should have gone through proper internal authorities to report the abuses and criminal acts being
committed within NSA. Would that be to the thoroughly corrupted, attack dog-watch dog entities, or the
thoroughly oblivious or compromised politicians responsible for oversight who are in fact, in the NSAs
pocket due to bribery, blackmail or stupidity?
Sher: The NSA seems to suffer from the some of the same maladies as did the recent outing of the
Secret Service. Without becoming too specific, would you give us a general idea as to advancement for
sexual favors that have occurred within the agency? How defeating is that to employees who are simply
working to protect the country while their bosses are indulging in sexual liaisons with lower level
employees?

Karen Stewart: In my career, promotions were always hard to come by, meted out perhaps every
Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
237
29
29
29
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page238
30 of
of183
336

five years if you were a good or exceptional worker, but male managers discovered that they held the
keys to paradise in regard to attractive or even acceptable women willing to take shortcuts. These
were the women who would make promotions in stunningly rapid succession with little to no
accomplishments - of their own, that is. While others killed themselves with years of grueling shift work
or even multiple dangerous foreign assignments only to find themselves evaluated as a 3.6 on a scale
of 5, when an attractive, morally loose recent college graduate would receive a 4.8 for essentially
alphabetizing a shelf of reference books her first 6 months on the job. This made many, many people
bitter and certainly sent the wrong signal to the hardest workers and the most talented. Though many
stopped being as dedicated to their jobs, others did indeed press ahead and worked tirelessly knowing
their reward was the mission accomplished and not likely appropriate recognition. Capable men
despaired of receiving deserved promotions and women almost feared being promoted for exceptional
work, fearing they would be assumed to be one of the typically incapable promotion bimbos among the
bloated management. Expertise and knowledge became commodities to guard and not share with new
workers, fearing you would not reap the benefits of your own work. This of course created a situation
where expertise and insight must be gained and regained from scratch, losing precious time training up
area or target experts to the detriment of the mission.
It was very discouraging to see immature or degenerate bosses spending their time flirting and chasing
skirts, the very same people who were charged with competently reviewing your work, (keeping
apprised of the big picture so people felt free to specialize their research), and whose responsibility it
was to accurately and honestly represent their people before promotion boards. But the atmosphere of
secrecy, the strict laws about divulging names of NSA employees or anything that occurred there,
emboldened certain men to believe that their wives and families would never know of their
indiscretions, and turned work time into play time for them. And now apparently young males are also
being pursued as sexual toys. One has to wonder what is being missed in the realm of highly perishable
intelligence leads by distracted managerial incompetents.
Sher: As an additional example of NSA intimidation, one of the things youd said may be shared is your
experience with the 3 Amigos. Would you tell us about them?

Karen Stewart:There were three eccentric looking older males who were often seen in the NSA OPS1
cafeteria together, whom we also got to know by word of mouth, as master electricians well-versed in
computer science. They were nicknamed by some in the analyst field as Rasputin, Santa, and Choo
Choo or the engineer, due to their highly unusual appearances and dress. One eye witness being
harassed on yet another NSA Security retaliatory witch hunt, reported seeing one of these men at her
home, on her property, when she discovered indications that her home had been broken into, her cable
box broken into, and her phone hacked, leaving tell-tale clicking sounds at regular intervals whenever
she used her phone. Any phone tap done by warrant is done at the carriers hub under their auspices
and will not click, only illegal hack jobs click.

She noted him not only as a trespasser being

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
238
30
30
30
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page239
31 of
of183
336

somewhere he should not have been, but recognized him by his highly unusual appearance from work.
When she attempted to look him up in the NSA data base by career specialty, she found that what
should have been his photo, which should have been a source of pride since he was of the rank to be a
Flag Badger (Manager whose rank is senior enough to garner a photo with the American flag in the
background), was instead a photo of a desert animal called a Meercat indicating that he wanted his
identity hidden from the general NSA population.
Sher: With regards to many who have said that the NSAs collection of meta-data on all forms of
communication between legal citizens of the USA is unconstitutional, also indicated is the fact that not
one terrorist act has been stopped by said collection. It appears good old-fashioned police work is what
still gets the perp. In your opinion, is this accurate?

Karen Stewart: I think it is indeed true that the meta data collection ruse within the USA distracts
from tried and true research and investigation, which the latter method apparently DID INDEED
uncover the 9/11 plot months before it happened, well in time to have prevented it, according to two
separate analysts with whom I have spoken, one just two days after 9/11 as he broke down and
sobbed his heart out, repeating We could have saved them! We could have saved them! But they
wouldnt let us report it!, and the other several years later, who maintained the same story of being
threatened and forbidden to report any warning about 9/11, then being harassed and fired for a nonexistent mentally illness. However, it is a good means to track your political enemies and detractors and
their affiliates within the US - for future reference? It would appear much more for the self-preservation
and expansion of NSA as the ubiquitous Orwellian Big Brother than for the protection of the USA. With
the power the NSA wields, it could easily influence border control issues and immigration issues to
make us not as susceptible to terrorist intrusions and infiltrations, but that would undermine their
power grab and expansion within the US, something never intended at NSAs creation - and for good
reason.
Sher:As a former long time employee of the NSA, what do you believeif anythingcan be done to
correct the problems within the agency?

Karen Stewart:There is no doubt that NSA is now run by those sycophants and sociopaths who are
the least desirable to have in any position of such sensitivity and trust and are purging NSA ranks of
people with integrity. Compromising activity that would rightfully cost you your clearance, is now
viewed as intrinsic perks of the job once you reach a certain pay grade. These lesser leaders have
turned NSA into an American Gestapo Wanna-Be agency. NSA lost its way with non-serious super grade
playboys not mature enough for the responsibility of the job of managing and directing NSA,
compounding the problem by promoting sycophants to protect their backs as well as lightweights with
whom to have sexcapades behind office doors, but in that group also has risen opportunistic
sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to more and more power, any way they can get it, and by
conniving and ruthlessness have blown past incompetent, distracted management to change the very

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
239
31
31
31
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page240
32 of
of183
336

nature of the NSA from watchman to the American people to jack booted prison guard.
If the Legislative Branch is possessed of anyone with the least bit of courage and common sense, they
would demand super clearances for those on the Intelligence Oversight Committees so that years or
decades of abusive behaviors, kingdom building, or even crimes can not continually be swept under the
rug by telling these particular politicians, You dont have the need to know, just trust us. Obviously,
they cannot be trusted. An appointment to that Committee would of course have to become much more
exclusive, requiring a thorough vetting as any job with a Top Secret clearance should. But to deal with
the toxic management at NSA now, I would require every Flag Badger and Security manager to account
for himself and what he adds to the mission. If he is pork, retire him or require him to laterally transfer
to another agency. Before that however, I would require that every single Flag Badger and every
Security group manager take a polygraph by non-NSA affiliated or non-NSA sympathetic sources to
account for the millions of dollars wasted on their vicious and illegal war on NSA employees who
dutifully report fraud, waste, abuse as well as sexual predation and treason. Those who are found to be
guilty of such things as falsifying accusations against innocent employees; fabricating false witnesses
and evidence; engaging in illegal acts of breaking and entering; falsifying FISA warrant justifications;
lying to the FBI about a targeted victims criminality; falsifying psychological assessments; subverting
lie detector exams by screaming at the targeted subject during or just before the exam to create false
impressions of guilt; hiding or destroying exonerating evidence supporting their victims claims;
intimidating or roughing up witnesses; coordinating or participating in criminal stalking and harassment
activities, illegal break-ins, illegal wire taps, organizing and paying civilian groups under the table to
augment harassment of targeted employees, and lastly, conspiring to effect or cover up any or all of
these actions. And any NSA employee in that group who pleads the 5th, should be fired and stripped of
his retirement since this type of betrayal rots a country from within. NSA must be recreated, and
returned to the stated task in their founding charter of focusing on foreign enemies overseas.
Sher: W, so much of the information youve provided is truly astounding! Thanks so much for being
with us today and I hope youll be available for another should ongoing events require one.
Click to view 3 Comments
Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieves op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple
internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The
Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple
university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
240
32
32
32
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page241
33 of
of183
336

1NSA Whistleblowor Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light Karen Stewarty

By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives

March 28, 2016

0 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

AddThis Sharing Buttons


Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to PinterestMore AddThis Share
options
In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to that column.
Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower has decided to
come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to write her story.

Her name is Karen Stewart Karen Stewart


BIO
Education

Freshman year - Schiller College, Strasbourg, Fr.


Sophomore - Senior years, graduated from Florida State University (79)
BS in German Language and a minor or co-major equivalent in fine art

Work History: 1982-2010 NSA (National Security Agency


Underwent initial retraining from 1982 - 83, on the job training to become a linguist in a needed foreign
language (chosen to train in depth in Russian since my college major, German was not in demand but I
had also studied Russian and French with good results).
Worked

various

projects

over

the

years,

not

just

USSR/Russia,

but

various

countries

researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances, weapons development and proliferation,
the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron Curtain and changing relations among newly
liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments of certain target countries. I researched and
wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian
countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what
got me fired because I questioned why my work was used to promote another employee who had no
experience with but, was credited with my work.

Note...Due to the Top Secret nature of the work, the above summary is slightly vague, by design.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
241
33
33
33
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page242
34 of
of183
336

The Interviow
Sher: Karen, thanks for taking the time to speak with me and its so good to have you back and this
time under your name! As a Whistleblower, what finally made you decide to come out from the
shadows?
Karen: I always intended to link my name with my story because it is a story that needs to be told, but
since I have a lawsuit against NSA (technically an appeal of an unlawful, employer action, i.e. my
termination at the 28 point year of my career for trying to request an investigation by the NSA
Inspector General), sitting under a gag order demanded by NSA, on the docket at the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in Baltimore, I could not do so without risking the
adjudication going against me for that reason alone. However, in 2015 NSA Security made the decision
to yet again engage in a massive slander campaign against me in my new location, thus breaking its
own gag order so I feel no compunction to be held to a standard required by the EEOC judge at NSAs
request that NSA itself clearly holds in utter contempt.
Sher: Since we last talked, a lot has happened with you. You have refused to drop your discrimination
lawsuit against the NSA and have shared with me that the agency has stepped up its efforts against
youpersonally.
Youre now being stalked by what appear to be NSA operatives. Is that correct? As you reported to me
they, also, seem to be using electronic emanation technology to both stop and damage you. I believe
former NSA employee and Whistleblower Russel Tice reported on this, also. This is really deep dark
side information. Would you tell the readers what theyre doing to you, [possibly] others and why?
Karen: First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a righteous lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
242
34
34
34
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page243
35 of
of183
336

I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011. All
was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from the
Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-stalking me
by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and NSA Security
personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon County
Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had personnel
land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of Lake Jackson
(near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking harassment
began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval Security
Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially stalk
and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security personnel to
Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of civilians
recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as to why
the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious questions
about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group eagerly
jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning multiple
people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home overnight
on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA also sought
out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be anything from
hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and monitor shortdistance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to facilitate car stalking
and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not assigned to me on a
certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to report my location
and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to someone about
what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going for the
usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit! But I did
report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run, purposely sideswiping my
car, and botching the placement/removal of a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my
spoiler. (They feared my mechanic would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
243
35
35
35
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page244
36 of
of183
336

my appointment). I even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular
internet site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that the
greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be decided, living in
Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.

In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to
recover my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009
I had researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing
phenomenon, but when electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really
grasp the concept and wondered about its existence. But I was to find out first hand
in November 2015 that it does exist and is a horrific crime against humanity.

NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons
emit multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves
modulated to radio frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I
understand yet. Now, with the help of certain mercenary and morally depraved
neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now with the intention being torture and slowkill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time, cause cancer, autoimmune
disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect stealth murder
weapon for a corrupt government. At this point, when we leave the house, a
criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at
us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order to speed up death, with the help
of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department are dragging their
feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when I try to enlist their help to
come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or one of my family is dead. They cant
quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and nothing protects the police or any official from
this new weapon held and wielded by criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience
using the mobile DEWs in Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered
at Ft. Meade with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and may
have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they say you do. If they

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
244
36
36
36
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page245
37 of
of183
336

use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of simply settling for a tenth of the
cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason
and get away with itincluding any leader or politician.
Sher: Why in the world do you think the NSA simply didnt settle the suit? With all of the
documentation you have, it seems that they are guilty of the discrimination and could have spent far
less of the taxpayers money to simply pay you off and make it go away. They would, also, have
avoided this coming out into the open. Are they that arrogant and Narcissistic?
Karen: This has truly NEVER made any sense to me or any of my friends, even those who worked at
NSA. NSA could have investigated, claimed a mistake had been made and retroactively promoted me
without even addressing the unethical behavior of W&S personnel. Instead, the IG refused to
investigate, illegally of course, but I could not have made him do his job. Plus, the guilty were
instructed to blame me for what turned out to be the first leak by ex-NSA executive Thomas Drake,
despite the fact that I had no access to, knowledge of or training in the type of material he leaked
(computer technology) and he was identified as the source of that leak six months before I was fired.
The polygraph section of Security actively tried to sabotage my polygraph exams in response to the
false counter-accusation by inappropriately screaming and threatening me, making it impossible to pass
a polygraph, which ruined my first polygraph in this regard though I passed the next two of the three
given in reaction to the false accusation.
The EEOC is capped at $300,000 actual damages, no punitive allowed. My intention was to get the lost
difference in my wages as a GS-12 when I should have been a GS-14, and to get the appropriate level
of retirement. Yet, clearly, NSA has spent millions organizing and paying civilians (and greasing the
palms of crooked law enforcement) to harass, bully, intimidate,and quite obviously viciously slander
me.
Do they engage in such psychopathic behavior because they can? Because they simply have no real
oversight? The operational head of NSA Security is indeed rumored far and wide to be an actual
psychopath who is obsessed with paintings of Dantes Inferno.
A coworker who worked in NSA Human Resources says she remembered when the resumes of
inappropriate people (criminals, perverts, mentally unstable) were automatically thrown away but
suddenly when General Hayden, a former NSA Director, promoted this particular man, the resumes of
thieves, moral degenerates, etc., were then coveted by Security. She said that she was so upset that
she had to find a different job. I did read an opinion on the Anti-polygraph site that NSA Security
leadership, and hence all of Security in essence, could be said to suffer from Dark Triad personality
disorder, which is a dangerous combination of such things as (malignant) narcissism, sociopathy, etc.
Their egos are such that they are obsessed with winning at all costseven fighting to keep a known
false accusation from being proven false by their victim, because they exist in their own projected
narrative. They exist in their own lies and cannot stand being exposed. This means they follow their
own agendas. What is good for NSA Security leadership, even at the cost of NSA or the USA. Their

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
245
37
37
37
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page246
38 of
of183
336

allegiances are to themselves. This has made me wonder, of late, if the woman who Security protected
instead of reprimanding or firing for sexually compromising W&S management was not a Security plant,
meant to do just that. And, in so doing, was NSA Security procuring a means to blackmail these
managers for themselves or another entity, perhaps foreign?
Sher: You have multiple photos and even drawings youve made of you stalkers. Youve also indicated
to me that the NSA has been in touch with your local law enforcement. Said law enforcement is siding
with the NSA against youa private citizen. What do your attorneys have to say about these?
Karen: At the beginning of my search for a law firm to take my case, Melville Johnson PC informed me
that I had potentially two cases, in 2009, an employment law case and a criminal case. I could only
afford to pursue the employment case since I was facing illegal termination on false pretenses within a
few months. While my lawyers have recorded the information about the new assault campaign by NSA
in Florida, thus far their pleas with the EEOC for some kind of response because their client is now in
physical danger have been completely ignored.
What has been going on in Florida is entirely criminal and could be a separate lawsuit, to even include
law enforcement in regard to their depraved negligenceif not complicity. But, at the moment, I am
concerned with surviving the relentless Directed Energy Weapons assaults. If I do not, then my family
will have to consider a wrongful death lawsuit against NSA, FBI (that refuse to get involved because
NSA is involved), and the FDLE, the TPD and Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as certain
complicit neighbors accepting a new riding mower or new carpeting in exchange for helping NSA
murder an inconvenient person who actually thought she had any Constitutional, human, or Civil
Rights.
Sher: With regards to your lawsuit, what are your current plans?
Karen: Good question. Reporting and recording the new barrage of assaults has whittled deeply into
my retainer. This was hard enough to maintain after spending about $110,000, thus far, and often
countering ridiculous and frivolous legal shenanigans by NSA to waste my money. With an outrageously
unresponsive EEOC, which may indeed be a complete and obscene sham for show, one wonders why
continue with the pretense that we exist as a nation of laws? Clearly, we do not.
The government has no desire for a level playing field to impede its quest for complete tyranny. We are
now a nation of wolves and sheeple. Im sure that after getting wind of this article, NSA will come to
the EEOC with big crocodile tears claiming they need to win by default because I broke the gag order
after they themselves spent millions, bald-faced lying to thousands of civilians, law enforcement and
(apparently) the FBI about me, invoking National Security Letters to swear them to secrecy and to hide
the true nature of their faux secret exercise in Tallahasseei.e., enticing a foolish community to stalk,
harass and commit murder for Big Brother.
But, God forbid the victim would speak out!
It truly sickens me that I spent my career trying to protect and serve my fellow Americans when not
only my government but these unworthy mercenary, sociopaths have stabbed me in the back. Some of

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
246
38
38
38
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page247
39 of
of183
336

the stalkers have even been Iraqi War veteranssome of whom might not have returned alive without
my reports.
I cant think a lot about the lawsuit with each nocturnal assault leaving me wondering if I or one of my
family will not wake up tomorrow. Im sentenced to death for being a patriot. What a country. I read
Psalm 91 & 94 nightly, praying God will want to erase this growing evil from our country. But, I also
remember that Ruth Graham said a while ago, if God doesnt judge America, Hell have to apologize to
Sodom and Gomorrah.
Americans are just not the people they and we used to be and, therefore, our leaders are either
apathetic cowards who tolerate evil or potentially monsters like NSA Securitywho show that they can
be and are not responsible to anyone but themselves.
Is NSA Security even able to be reined in anymore? Or would any potential leader be found dead of a
microwave induced heart attack if he tried to? Someone ought to care but I may not be around long
enough to see it.
Sher: Thanks you so much for all youve done and I sincerely hope and pray youre wrong, Karen. Its
individuals like you who founded the United States of America on Godly principles and an unwavering
sense of ethics.
*Karen may be contacted for interviews at kams56@ME.com

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
247
39
39
39
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page248
40 of
of183
336

StanJ. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163

Greg Szymanskis Interview


With Julianne McKinney
Microwave Harassment and Mind Control
Transcribed for Advanced Media Group,
05/28/16

This interview contains information from Julianne McKinneys book Microwave Harassment and
Mind Control Experimentation, 1992, as well as current conditions world-wide. Years of
interviews turned Gregg Szymanski from skeptic to believer in the secret world of electronic
harassment, as harassment against Julianne McKinney has turned potentially lethal. They are
taking a stand to help TIs, Targeted Individuals, many civilians, escape this cruel harassment.

Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of major
source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in this harassment. I
dont know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV across the street on which I
saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an office environment. Gang stalked. Shows
brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated, sleek, communications operation. Why would it be
used? As I said either for entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs,
who are to be harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you cant harass someone if you dont know
what that person looks like. So its a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the TI
looks like.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
248
40
40
40
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page249
41 of
of183
336

TRANSCRIPT OF GREG SZYMANSKIS INTERVIEW WITH JULIANNE MCKINNEY


ON MICROWAVE HARASSMENT AND MIND CONTROL
Published May 28, 2016
Greg Szymanski:

GAlso)

I have a guest whos never given a radio interview before. Her name is

Julianne McKinney. For those of you who dont know who she is, she is an expert in electronic
harassment and surveillanceformer military background. And those of you who have followed this
story on my show, many may know who she is and the importance she has in this field.
Were just going to lay some very solid credibility to what weve been talking about. So this interviews
quite important and I want you to remember that, as we go along, shes a very, very well-read person.
Were gonna get to that in a minute. The problem on the use of electronic weaponry on a person was
when I was working in a law office. The law office I was working for severaloh a number of years ago,
the law office I worked for prided in taking cases that were difficult. And I listened to a person tell me
about the facts regarding the use of electronic weaponry. And I had a discussion with somebody else at
the law firm and we came to this conclusion causation causation causation Greg, remember that
element. Its going to be awfully difficult to link whats happening to the person. The injuries they were
alleging, to actually the person, or the defendants, that were doing it.
So it was a case, Ill be very honest with you, that I was very skeptical over. But, as a journalist, I
started to interview a number of people, and I would like to say that this issue, after a number of years,
has come up to one of the top of my list as a problem in this country.
I talked to hundreds of people all around the country that are experiencing things that are just
unbelievable. And from a standpoint of the law, you want to get justice for these people. You hate to
see their lives destroyed, and you hate to see what happens, to a person thats been harassed. But the
biggest problem is its very difficult to pinpoint whats going on.
I have a guest today who is an expert in this field. You, the public, may not know who she is. But those
of you who have been targeted and listen to my show know very well. Shes never been interviewed
before and I feel honored that shes here. Her name is Julianne McKinney. Shes had an extensive
career in the US Army as an Area Intelligence Case Officer till 1990.
Upon her return to civilian life Julianne became a member of the Association of National Security
Alumni. That is an organization of former intelligence officers dedicated to exposing excesses by the US
Intelligence Services. Julianne became the director of the Electronic Surveillance Project under their
auspices

as

such

she

authored

the

publication

Microwave

Harassment

and

Mind

Control

Experimentation in 1991. She kept that electronic surveillance project going for four years, funding it
with her own personal funds, obtained by her military benefits and pay.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
249
41
41
41
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page250
42 of
of183
336

Julianne did not copy write her work and it is out in the public domain for the public good. Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, the public has taken her hard copy publication and
uploaded it to several thousand domain sites over the past 15 years. It is respected as one of the most
important publications on this subject. And with that, Id like to say hello, Ms. McKinney, how are you
today?
Julianne McKinney: Please dont call me Ms. McKinney (laugh).
Greg: Okay, can I say Julianne?
Julianne: Yes, Julianne.
Greg: Now, youre an expert in surveillance and electronic harassment. The first question I have is
that, in your observation, is there a wider scale of surveillance of average people, people with no threat
to national security, in your estimation?
Julianne: I would say that most of us targeted are not, and never have been, a threat. I think that
what happened initially, when these operations began probably 30 years, ago people were singled out,
perhaps, because of some affiliation, either direct or indirect, with the United States government, and
invited attention. But they were not singled out as being a threat; they were singled out as being
lucrative targets of experimentation.
In the past 15 years, since shutting down the Electronic Surveillance Project, primarily to seek
employment, which I did seek, and did obtain, I had occasion to observe many, many, many instances
of individuals in the corporate environment being singled out and targeted simply because they were
convenient targets of opportunity. And, I have to comment on something I heard you say
Greg: Okay
Julianne:

Early on you referred to the difficulty of establishing causation in order to pursue these

claims.
Greg: That, I might add, that was made is a legal sense, based on the fact that we were nave people,
not really understand I have to be honest with youI had not understood the problem back then,
and felt it would be a difficult problem, based on the fact of how the crime was committed and knowing
how to pin that crime on someone. Go ahead.
Julianne: I understand the legal implications, certainly. There is enough literature, on the internet and
elsewhere, that establishes the existence of these weapon systems. To pinpoint, for purposes of
prosecution, to pinpoint their existence would be difficult and the position I take is that rather than
pinpoint for prosecution purposes, easy enough to single them out by electronic means to destroy
them. But I guess thats taking the matter a little far left field.
I think, frankly, we still face, until congress establishes laws that forbid the use of these technologies
for involuntary experimental purposes, that were going to get absolutely nowhere in attempting to
prosecute.
Greg:

Okay, listen, I need to take a break Julianne. And well be back in three minutes on the

Investigative Journal.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
250
42
42
42
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page251
43 of
of183
336

Julianne: Okay.
Greg:

Okay, back for the second half hour. My guest is Julianne McKinney. Shes an expert on

surveillance and electronic harassment. And Julianne, I gave you an introduction at the beginning of the
show.
Julianne: Yes
Greg:

A brief introduction. But I think our listeners would like to know your background and why

youre qualified to make these statements. I think its important.


Julianne: Okay.
Greg: If you could do that for us.
Julianne: Well, I would take exception to the term expert in these weapons systems.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne:

I certainly have had experience with them, having, for approximately the past 40 years,

been on the receiving end of this type of harassment. Expertise in surveillance comes with my
employment in the intelligence field. I understand what constitutes surveillance and am capable of
immediately spotting the surveillance and I can see, as in the case of gang stalking, a subject that you
have addressed on prior occasions. I can see those who I label as covert want-to-bes fumbling through
what they think are covert activities and Id find it really rather amusing if it werent so perverted in the
ultimate objective.
Im not certain what more I can add. I do have experience with these weapon systems. Ive had
sufficient opportunity over these past many years to observe the progressive threat of these
harassment operations. And Im talking specifically about electronic weapon systems.
Greg: Well, youve been a voice - I mean a strong voice - for warning people of these systems for at
least the past 10 years regarding the installation of specialized electronic equipment and utilities. What
are these electronics and what are their capabilities?
Julianne:

Their capabilities, generally, are to inflict pain in a highly focused fashion, and to alter

mental states. Certainly, when you have a frequency aimed at your brain, your mental functions tend to
alter. In amplified form, theyre sufficient, the frequencies are. They have the capacity to kill. Though
thats one reason the department of defense refers to them as less than lethal rather than nonlethal weapons. As a matter of fact, the Department of Defense has gone so far to eliminate them, to
remove them from the category of even less than lethal weapons to bury them in the category of
electronic weapons trying to make them a little bit blacker.
Greg:

Now is this protocol of surveillance and harassment seemingly patterned after a government

protocol now applied to the general civilian population?


Julianne:

Its difficult to pinpoint everything on the US government exclusively because these are

global operations.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne:

The pattern the protocols, are virtually identical on a global scale so someone is

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
251
43
43
43
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page252
44 of
of183
336

overseeing the entire activity. The government obviously is complicent because otherwise these
operations would not be allowed to exist. Why? Its hard to say. Whether its for testing electronic
weapon systems for future use under combat conditions or whether ultimately there's a holocaust. (nointelligible) Its hard to say.
Greg:

Well, you know what I find interesting.how people who arent aware of this problem cant

believe its happening to begin with. And I try to mentionI have run stories about the Duplessis
Orphans. Its a program thats been verified, that the government actually used money in Canada and
the United States to do medical testing on children, on adults. Ive talked to people on the POW issue,
one Dr. Joe Douglas, who has documented how, that our government has done allowed foreign
governments to do illegal experimentation on POWs. So why would people think that they wouldnt
allow it on just average citizens? Just in your mind. Do you have an answer for people?
Julianne: Why wouldnt they allow it?
Greg: Yeah, my thing is that they do it, theyre doing it. But some people that deny it cant believe
that our government would do something like this.
Julianne: I find, even among the community of, I hate using slang terms, but the term TI is common,
referring to targeted individuals. Those are people who know they are on the receiving end of electronic
weapon systems. And even amongst TIs, there is a perception in certain areas that our government
wouldnt do this; a case of not recognizing reality. First of all if this were not being done by our
government, congress would step in because of the hundreds of complaints they have received,
thousands of complaints, no doubt, over the past 10-15 years, from citizens who recognize whats going
on. Congress, back in the early 90s, late 80s, took the position that anyone complaining about these
systems were imagining things because they simply didnt exist. In two years, by 1992, they were off
the drawing boards, and in fact, being fielded and conveyed to law enforcement agencies.
Congress recognizes that these weapon systems exist and funds them, and knows, as a result of
appropriate briefings, what the bio-effects can be. Yet they have passed no legislation prohibiting their
use under unconstrained experimental circumstances.
Thats number 1. Number 2, given the nature, given the nature, given that the systems draw on
existing power grids, it would be necessary for the FCC at a minimum, and the Department of Energy,
as a minimum, give some oversight and control over what is going on. Though obviously, those with
Congress, the FDA and the Department of Energy, the FCC and the Department of Energy are
knowledgeable and yet unwilling to do anything about it. So, there is complicity, but the question is,
whos knitting, and submitting, the US government, allowing these operations to take place?
Greg: Now from your experience, how intense is this surveillance of targeted individuals? And tell us
about the ways that the targeted that this is accomplished.
Julianne: From what I have observed, first of all I should explain that the standard that I address this
in Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, it was a pattern that was unfolding as I
was dealing with other targeted individuals whothat contacted me. It was a pattern of harassment

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
252
44
44
44
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page253
45 of
of183
336

which indicated that there had been some surveillance going on, some monitoring of their private lives.
There had been entry into their houses. There was systematic harassment. And then, ultimately, as part
of a softening up process, and then ultimately, electronic harassment, which followed; which would
include the inducement of auditory input, which is now being referred to as Z2K.
In answer to your question (laugh) Im not certain if I I think Im probably missing the point there,
but in order to target someone, it requires that that person be put under surveillance, so that their
personality traits, their capacity to inter- relate with people, their capacity for corruption or noncorruption, that seems to be a critical point. And even their religion factors into it.
Following a period of harassments, they are singled out for preliminary stages of harassment which
includes gang stalking, entry of their private homes or apartments, followed by gradually intensified
and ultimately extremely intensified electronic harassment. This is the pattern that has unfolder over
and over and over.
Greg:

And so, when you, I guess what Im getting atthats a very good answer. Youre seeing a

pattern amongst these individuals. I guessyeahis there any pattern about how they choose them?
Julianne: I cant speak for men. But it appears that quite a few of the women who have been singled
out appear to be somewhat, too independent; perhaps too intelligent. Tend to live alone or tend to
pursue professional careers. Theres a heavy predominance of those types of women in the TI
community, the community of targeted individuals. Men are in a smaller proportion and seem to be
those who have a propensity to fly off the handle. Have a sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to
invite targeting. And I did mention a curious predominance of a certain lack of religion amongst TIs, as
opposed to a certain predominance of a particular religion amongst those who are participating in these
operations.
Greg: Now you mentioned this was a global problem. Have you communicated with people from across
the Atlantic regarding whats going on in other countries? Is it similar to here?
Julianne:

Its virtually identical, virtually identical. When I was running the electronic surveillance

project I was in extensive correspondence with people overseas and patterns were the same. The
nature of the gang stalking and harassment were the same.
Greg: Now, when youre talking about specific numbers I know youreyouve been following this for
years and years and years. Is there any way that you can give our listeners a kind of an idea of how
wide spread this problem is in terms numbers in our country and compared to maybe overseas?
Julianne: I would say that the person who has realized what is going on is just a drop in a bucket. The
persons whom I have seen being targeted are completely unaware of whats happening. So those who
are complaining of this are, as I said, the tip of the iceberg. I would say this is very, very, widespread.
But I cannot under the circumstances come up with any figures. Many, many, many thousands, no
doubt, are involved. But I would say that the bulk of them are running to their doctors and taking
totally unnecessary prescription drugs to cure ailments that dont exist.
Gregg: I guess that you have to ask this question even though its very difficult to answer. And you

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
253
45
45
45
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page254
46 of
of183
336

mentioned, you said it earlier. But I really have to ask it because its on my mind and I know its always
in the back of everyones mind when they think of this problem. Why?? What is the major reason, I
mean, outside of just pure experimentation Im interested; for example, lets say that they have
targeted 100 people in Oklahoma. What do they, first of all, why are they doing it? Is it for, basically, a
blanket statement controlling the population? Orand, what do they do with this information once they
get it?
Julianne: I dont think they do anything with the information once they get it, other than to establish
a harassment protocol which will follow that targeted individual for the rest of his or her life. Why are
they doing it? I see a number of reasons. First, I dont know if youve done any research on the
phenomenon of capturing a percentage of the population in order to install a dictatorship. There is
always a percentage of the population, roughly 20% or so, that will buckle and throw whatever
constitutions might exist into the toilet and eagerly join the efforts at destroying the remainder of the
population.
Part of the problem or part of the objective they are seeking obviously is testing the latest and greatest
in electronic weaponry and other forms of technologies. A part of it is to control and choreograph those
who are involved in these harassment operations on the dispensing end. And it would appear that those
being targeted are simply objects who I see as ultimately being disposable. In other words, I think that
once full control is established over a major percentage of the population, and enough of the population
is silenced and unwilling to stick their necks out, that we inevitably would be heading toward a
holocaust.
Greg: The question, if I was, for example, lets say we have a person, who suspects, and lets just for
hypothetical purposes, say this person is being targeted, okay? Now, tell our listeners, because Ive
always wondered this myself, okay. Im sitting in my house and I see around me theres telephone
poles, there may be a tower in the distance that I dont see that handles the cell phones. Theres of
course a grid of electric going on around me. Ive talked to people and I try to say, how does this get
into your house? And I wanted to get your opinion, if a person is targeted, how basically are they
beginning to intrude their premises, and violate their constitutional rights, not only their rights ofnot
only trespassing on their property? Go ahead. How would that happen?
Julianne: Now, are you talking about, how would the frequencies impact upon them and how would
they first become aware of it? Or how would they first become aware of the fact that their privacy has
been violated?
Greg: Well no, I guess I didnt explain the question right. I wanted to know how they physically, are
doing it? I mean are they using a cell tower? Are they using a truck thats in the distance? How is this
being transmitted into the home to target the person and to use this weaponry on them, from your
experience?
Julianne: Well, first of all, in order to target a person you have to be able to see that person. And
while they may not be able to, they may, on entering the house, plant miniature cameras, miniature

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
254
46
46
46
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page255
47 of
of183
336

microphones, as a means of, for their monitoring a person. But that is not necessarily the means by
which they hone in on a person. There are plenty of technologies that allow for the imaging of a person
that might be sitting in a chair, as you mentioned you might be.
Using infrared imagery techniques, for example, they can capture your image by monitoring the
concentration of heat emanating from your body using certain acoustical frequencies, they can detect
mass. And using sophisticated computer software, they can convert those images to likenesses on
computers, which conceivably could be used in a software program that could be connected to an
electronic weapon system. And in that context I should point out that, while devices draw on the
existing power grid, and while theyyes indeed, they do involve microwave towers
Sounds like youve got a commercial coming on
Greg:

Yes we do, and thank you for making my job easier. Well be back in 3 minutes on the

Investigative Journal.
First, Ive put this in the top 3 of my stories that I believe are important, that the American people need
to deal with, because as Ms. McKinney, who is a, I consider her an expert. She would only say shes an
authority. But let me tell you, Julianne, you are an expert in this. The reasons could be, like she said at
thebefore we went into the break, and a total testing of our population to see, basically, perhaps
maybe there is a holocaust in the future or a dictatorship in the future. And they want to see how
people react to it. That may be a simplistic way to look at it. Not a simplistic way that Julianne looked at
it but my way of explaining it.
But lets get back to some of the things here, the last few minutes that are important. What can you tell
us, Julianne, about the microwave energy on citizens in terms of the existence of such a program and
the nuts and bolts of what they do?
Julianne:

Microwave energy is only one aspect of the entire electromagnetic frequency spectrum.

Microwaves can be lethal depending upon how theyre used. Obviously in order to achieve appropriate
effects on people, they have to be pulsed, because otherwise the individual would be cooked from the
inside out. The objective of using microwaves as opposed to other electromagnetic frequencies would
be to inflict extremes of pain to cause thermal heating. Thats a common complaint which leaves a hot
spot on the scull. Again, primarily, just to inflict extremes of pain. I was just wondering, we kind of
skipped over or didnt quite complete a preceding topic.
Greg: Oh, go ahead, go ahead. Youve got free reign.
Julianne:

You were talking about the use of the electrical grid throughout the country, the use of

microwave towers, the use of devices affixed to poles that are connected to power lines. But what
wasnt addressed, what you havent mentioned, is also that these weapon systems are used by
neighbors surrounding persons who have been singled out as targets of opportunity.
Greg: Are they solicited to do this or what?
Julianne: Thats something that Ive been pondering for some time. Again, what Ive noticed is, there
seems to be a predominant, particular religion that makes it particularly easy for them to cooperate.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
255
47
47
47
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page256
48 of
of183
336

Greg: Well listen, lets talk about that after the break, a short break, and then Ive got something to,
some business I have to take care of for 3 4 minutes. Then well get back for our 2 nd hour with
Julianne McKinney. Well take some calls. Back in 2 minutes on the Investigative Journal.
(In this section there seemed to be jumping around, like maybe the video was edited or there was
some problem with the recording.)
by some of the Tis and thats Targeted Individuals.
That song rose to number one without any publicity on the internet. And that song called TI, well play
that again Dr. McKinney. I think it hits the nail on the head. I mean theres a lot of people out there
suffering. And I know youre one person, an authority in this field. And for my guests who are just
picking us up this hour, Dror excuse me, Julianne McKinney is a very highly regarded person in the
field of electronic weaponry, and surveillance in studying this issue. Shes a former area Intelligence
Case Officer until 1990 in the Army. And her credentials can be found, will be found, you can go to
RBNLive.com and go to my archives in the Investigative Journal and read about that. Shes well
qualified. Shes still with us this hour. And Dror excuse me, I keep calling you Dr. and you should be.
Julianne: (Laugh) Im not a Dr., thank you. Dr. Americus.
Greg: Dr. Americus. You know, thats funny. I have a doctorate in law. And nobody ever calls me that
and I hate being called that, a doctor. But Im interviewed on a Tehran TV station once every blue
moon, couple months, and they refer to me as Dr. Szymanski. And its nice to hear once in a while. Ill
be honest with you. Every two months is good enough. Otherwise they just call me the jerk on the
radio, which is better.
But, lets go from here. Youre adding such credibility to this story, adding credibility in my mind as I
speak. Because, Ive talked to hundreds of these people and was a doubting Thomas in the beginning. I
must mention that. I did not think it existed, and that was years ago. I thought people were either
insane, or crazy, or trying to get attention. But you know something? I will admit I was totally wrong
with that initialI guessthe look at the situation and have come around to fully believe in most of the
people I talk to and really sympathize with their suffering as I see their lives being ripped apart.
Are there any things you can dowere going to get into a few more things here as far as the technical
aspects of this but what can targeted individuals do to get some peace in their life? I mean thats one
thing theyre looking for. Is there anything they can do?
Julianne: (prolonged silence)
Greg: Difficult question there.
Julianne: Its very difficult to advise targeted individuals how to acquire peace. These frequencies can
be blocked or deflected. All of these frequencies I have found, some may contest this, but I have found
can beare vulnerable, and are subject to deflection. And the pain can be immediately (word unclear),
if not halted all together. Finding peace by writing to members of congress or to state legislators might
not be a better alternative because you will be treated as something worthy of the circular basket. They
just wont intervene. Writing to the various agencies and calling a meeting with them serves no useful

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
256
48
48
48
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page257
49 of
of183
336

purpose either because they will say there are no laws prohibiting these types of activities. They cant,
say for example, the FBIand I was given this statement on a number of occasions.there are no laws
prohibiting experimentation with these weapon systems. Youre talking to the wrong people.
So my advice would be to do what you can to secure your premises, because so long as your house is
or apartment is being entered, you are susceptible to, in addition to being targeted by electronic
weapons, there is a potential for having drugs put in your food. And Im not exaggerating there.
Greg: I had a few targeted individuals I talked to send me some questions that Id like to ask you.
Julianne: Certainly.
Greg: And the one was Are targeted individuals also broadcast around the country via closed circuit
TV? And, What purpose does this serve? Im fully in the dark on this question, but, go ahead.
Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of
major source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in
this harassment. I dont know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV
across the street on which I saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an
office environment. Gang stalked. Shows brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated,
sleek,

communications

operation.

Why

would

it

be

used?

As

said

either

for

entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs, who are to be
harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you cant harass someone if you dont know what
that person looks like. So its a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the
TI looks like.
Greg: Okay, now, before I get to some more, I want to put out that call for people to call. I got a
couple emails. A lot of times Tis dont want to go public. And theyve sent me some emails. I want to
get to one in a minute. But one question I have for you is, how can people gather evidence to support
their beliefs that this is happening to them? Many people will say, well its only a lack of sleep. I mean,
you have a sleep disorder. Maybe theres a problem with your joints, I dont know. It could be anything
that the answers are when you suspect youre being targeted. What kind of evidence do you tell people
to gather to support their beliefs that this is actually happening to them.
Julianne:

Well, when youre gathering evidence, obviously you have an objective in mind and that

generally is legal. What you want to do with that evidence. Theres really nothing you can do with it. So
in the absence of that, the main thing is to try to protect yourself and to alleviate the pain that youre
experiencing. Collecting the evidence, if you were to go to, frankly, Id strongly recommend that you
keep your faculties together and avoid going to see psychiatrists and psychologists, because the pattern
that is evolving is that they are highly complicit of these operations.
And if you go to a medical doctor, you do not talk about it because medical doctors, many, are also
involved. What you do when you see a doctor is that you define your symptoms and get a very clear
statement that, well, we cant figure this out. Well, thats a clear indication that it is not indigenous,
its not part of your system. Its not coming from within you, so obviously something is happening from

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
257
49
49
49
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page258
50 of
of183
336

outside. If they prescribe drugs and yet cant find the ecology, the basis for your disease, dont take
those drugs.
Greg:

Now earlier we were talking about the fact that they may, whoevers doing this, youve

delineated, youve led a good course into whatyoure tracking these people. But what I was getting at,
we never got to the point where ifyou mentioned something about a religious group that may be
targeted. What did you mean by that?
Julianne: The way I dont.well let me put it this way. Im not out to start a religious war. I have
found over the years that the persons involved, both in gang stalking.Ive made it a point to get to
know these people. Ive had to necessarily. Im not the type to
Greg: Youre talking about the perpetrators or the targets?
Julianne: The perpetrators.
Greg: Okay
Julianne: As well as theIve been drawing distinctions. And what Ive found is that the perpetrators
appear to belong predominantly to one particular religion; whereas the targeted individuals do not
belong predominantly to that particular religion.
Greg: And what is the particular religion of the perpetrators?
Julianne:

Right. So, at this stage, again, Im not particularly enthused about the idea of starting a

religious war. And I have challenged other TIs to get out there and become acquainted with, and get to
know, the people who are harassing them, to draw those distinctions themselves, because Im not
going to be making brash claims. This is something Ive observed over the past 10 years.
Greg: Thats fair enough. And maybe, perhaps, I could talk to you about it just for my own knowledge
off the air.
Julianne: That would be fine.
Greg: And I will keep your name out of it at that point and let people know what the targeted group
may be and what the other group may be.
Julianne: There is a religious influence but thats not to say these people arent just being used as
puppets by some broader interest.
Greg: Very good point. Can you stick with us one more segment of 5 minutes?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Were interviewing Julianne McKinney, our last segment. Juliannes an authority in the use of
surveillance and electronic weaponry. And this is an email question, kind of a technical one from a TI.
Let me read this to you. Perhaps you can answer it. Are the protocols for each individual modified based
to custom tailor it for the specific targeted individual? And if so, how does this process work?
Julianne: Yes indeed they are modified. There is a basic protocol that the perpetrators begin with. But
the TI contributes to the modification. A good example of that would be, if someone. Im trying to
think of a good example. If the TI feels the need to cooperate, even in the most subtle fashion, with the
persons who are harassing him or her, he or she will modify his behavior, in pathlobean condition, which

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
258
50
50
50
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page259
51 of
of183
336

alters the protocol. Theyre constantly, targets are constantly monitored, and if they respond
emotionally to a particular trigger, that will be built into the protocol. If the target displays a certain
sense of guilt or embarrassment about a subject, that will be built into the protocol. Its an ongoing
process. And one thing I want to emphasize is no TI should look for a reason as to why this is going on.
Its a serious, serious mistake. I know I did that myself when they started on me and over the years I
came up with probably 6 different excuses.
Greg: Is it still going on with you?
Julianne: Oh yes. Not to the degree that it was before but certainly in very lethal form.
Greg: Now, how has this hampered your life?
Julianne: Its come close to being lethal on a number of occasions. I deal, I dealt with gang stalking
head on and I essentially put that to rest. I deal with.Ive developed a means for communicating with
perps directly and made them feel like the trailer trash that they are. So gang stalking is not one of
their favorite activities in my case. So the primary activity now is to see what I can survive in the way
of an induced brain aneurism or stroke or a heart attack.
Greg: I just had a caller who doesnt want to get on the air but wants to know, does moving help;
moving your location?
Julianne: Running, if youre talking about moving to a completely new location, no. This country is
wired to the hilt for immediate transfer. Your protocol follows you wherever you go so its a waste of
time. Moving about physically in place will not change anything. Other than, if you make a 180 degree
turn you will notice the targeting will suddenly stop because the weapon systems are programmed to
focus on a particular area of your anatomy. So if you turn, the targeting will suddenly end. If you turn
back itll hit you again.
Greg: Interesting. Now, going full circle in the last 2 minutes here, in 1991 you published Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation. This has been passed around the internet and over
thousands of domain sites over the past 15 years. Can you tell us how someone can get ahold of this
publication to be informed?
Julianne: Its not copy-writed. All they need to do is plug in my last name, McKinney, and type in the
title Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation and innumerable sites will appear and
just read it from there. It will give you a good insight into what the pattern is when harassment begins.
Greg:

Now, let me just spell your name for people that are going to do that. Thats MCKINNEY

McKinney. And then its Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation for an authority in
the field.
I guess since 1981, have you seen.I guess a question I wanted to ask, from 2001, have you seen any,
from the time of 911, has there been an increase in the last 4or 5 years, with this type of, that youve
seen, in the number of people contacting you. Has it been more wide spread since 911?
Julianne: Not since 911. WhenI would say back in the early 90s Ive seen a tremendous expansion
of these activities since the early 1990s. And it has moved forward in consistent fashion. Its become

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
259
51
51
51
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page260
52 of
of183
336

ever more sophisticated and ever more wide spread. There was no sudden burst or flurry of activity
since 911.
Greg: And you have no help whatsoever with the political arena in this. Correct? Politicians will not
touch this with a 10 foot pole?
Julianne: Thats right. And even those who purport to be liberally inclined, and Im speaking about
members of the democratic party, will not touch it, because quote unquote, and they know, they know
whats going on. They dont they simply dont have the funds to be able to pursue it. All sorts of
humma humma excuses will be furnished for not pursuing something like this. Before you close.I hear
the music in the background.
Greg: We can stay another minute if you want.
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Why dont you come back for 2 minutes on the other side of the break and then well finish up.
Okay?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Okay, back with Julianne McKinney and 3 minutes on the Investigative Journal. You wanted to
say something at the break.
Julianne: I did. I want to thank you very, very much for taking on this subject. There are so few in the
media, as a matter of fact, youre the only one I know of, who has the guts to address it.
Greg: And you know, it really doesnt just in defense of every other media person. I dont think its
guts, in a sense, maybe it is. I dont consider myself having guts in this issue. I consider it to be an
issue that you need to take time to understand it. And thats what I would recommend to the people in
the media that havent touched this issue. If it isnt being down right censored by someone above you,
at least take the time to talk, Ill spend time talking to you about it. Because it took me a little time to
figure it out. And, Ill tell you what, its people like you that need to be applauded because its your
efforts that are bringing this to the forefront. Youre laying the credibility on the line. But I thank you
anyway for your kind words.
And with that, I wanted to say goodbye to you. And were going to have to move on. And well have you
on again to talk about this. And thank you so much.
Julianne: And thank you so much.
Greg: And that was Julianne McKinney. And she is an authority in the use of electronic weaponry and
microwave weaponry and she was with us for the last hour and a half.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
260
52
52
52
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page261
53 of
of183
336

r. Nick Begich Author and Expert Researcher


of Electromagnetic Weapons
Biography
Dr. Nick Begich is the eldest son of the late United States Congressman
from Alaska, Nick Begich Sr., and political activist Pegge Begich. He is well
known in Alaska for his own political activities. He was twice elected
President of both the Alaska Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage
Council of Education. He has been pursuing independent research in the
sciences and politics for most of his adult life. Begich received Doctor of
Medicine (Medicina Alternitiva), honoris causa, for independent work in
health and political science, from The Open International University for
Complementary Medicines, Colombo, Sri Lanka, in November 1994.
He co-authored with
Jeane Manning the
book Angels Don't Play This HAARP; Advances in
Tesla Technology. Begich has also authored Earth
Rising - The Revolution: Toward a Thousand
Years of Peace and and his latest book Earth
Rising II- The Betrayal of Science, Society and
the Soul both with the late James Roderick. His
latest work is Controlling the Human Mind - The
Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak
Performance. Begich has published articles in
science, politics and education and is a well
known lecturer, having presented throughout the
United States and in nineteen countries. He has been featured as a guest on thousands of radio
broadcasts reporting on his research activities including new technologies, health and earth science
related issues. He has also appeared on dozens of television documentaries and other programs
throughout the world including BBC-TV, CBC-TV, TeleMundo, and others.
Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament. He has spoken on
various issues for groups representing citizen concerns, statesmen and elected officials, scientists and
others. He is the publisher and co-owner of Earthpulse Press. He served as Tribal Administrator/Village
Planner for the Chickaloon Village Council, a federally recognized American Indian Tribe of the
Athabascan Indian Nation for five years and served four years as the Executive Director of The Lay
Institute of Technology, Inc. a Texas non-profit corporation. Currently Begich consults for tribal
organizations, private corporations and others in a number of research areas.
Dr. Begich is a single person with five adult children, and four grandchildren.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
261
53
53
53
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page262
54 of
of183
336

Covert Harassment Conference


1-2 October 2015, Berlin, Germany

2
3
Mind Control:
4
5

DR. NICK BEGICH


A Brave New World together with HAARP The Update

DR. BEGICH:

Hello, and thank you for being

here and thank you to Peter and the rest of the team for

putting this together.

8
9

Everyone hears me okay, yes?


Okay.

In the back?

Good.

10

All right.

I want to give a little bit of

11

background in terms of my interest in these areas.

12

those that don't know my family story, it really goes

13

back quite a ways.

14

For

My father was in the United States Congress in

15

the early 1970s during the Nixon Administration.

16

lost in a plane with Hale Boggs.

17

remember this if you've got a little bit of gray hair.

18

Hale Boggs was our House majority leader at the time,

19

one of the most powerful people in the United States

20

Congress.

21

strong dislike for J. Edgar Hoover, because he basically

22

read everybody's mail, tapped everybody's phones,

23

including the United States Congress, and then,

24

essentially, blackmailed political leaders to follow

25

whatever script he laid out.

Some of you may

He was also a Warren Commissioner.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
262
54
54
54
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

He was

He had a

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page263
55 of
of183
336

Boggs was a pretty outspoken individual.

At

the time -- it was just before the second election of

Richard Nixon -- Boggs came to Alaska to work on my

father's campaign, which would have been his second term

in the United States Congress.

Boggs, before they flew out on October 16th,

three weeks before the second election of Richard Nixon,

began to talk about this scandal brewing in Washington,

DC.

In fact, that very scandal, had it unfolded a

10

little bit differently -- for those that remember, the

11

planes disappeared.

12

Three weeks later, Nixon's elected for his

13

second term.

14

the Watergate scandal broke.

15

office.

16

moved up again.

17

Rockefeller then slid into the Vice President's slot.

18

And then one of the old Manson women from the Charles

19

Manson days tried to assassinate Ford, which would have

20

put Rockefeller in the White House.

21

It wasn't too much long after that that

Ford moved up.

Agnew was thrown out of

Then Nixon resigned.

Ford

For those that don't remember,

What would have otherwise happened, most

22

likely, the election would have taken place.

23

would have won.

24

out at the same time.

25

controlled the Congress.

Nixon

Agnew and Nixon would have been thrown


The Democrats would have
The Speaker of the House would

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
263
55
55
55
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page264
56 of
of183
336

have elevated to the Presidency.

have been in control.

happened and history tells us a lot about what really

happened there.

The Democrats would

But the opposite, of course,

Twenty years later there was a report, an

investigative report by a publication called "Roll Call"

in Washington, DC.

these various Congressional deaths.

crashes are kind of the hazard of political leadership,

10
11

That report was looking into all of


You know, plane

it seems like.
But in researching that, what they found in the

12

FBI files were a couple of telexes -- this goes before

13

FAX machines -- and telexes coming from California into

14

Washington, DC reported that two people had been found

15

at a crash site.

16

the FBI to determine whether they were credible.

17

follow-up telex came through saying, yes, they were.

18

That plane was never recovered.

19

officially; yet 20 years later, we find out, in fact,

20

there were.

21

Those sources were later looked at by


A

There were no survivors

So I know about conspiracies.

Conspiracies are

22

conversations that happen in a room like this when

23

there's a bunch of people standing on the outside who

24

might not agree with us.

25

the political life, even at the highest levels, things

But the reality is, even in

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
264
56
56
56
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page265
57 of
of183
336

happen.

Maybe a few decades go by before the truth is finally

revealed.

Things happen that aren't easily explained.

So I have a strong motivation foundationally in

terms of how I approach controversial issues.

do it with fear.

years.

is the absolute adversary for getting anything

accomplished on this planet.

10

I don't

I've been doing this work for over 20

Fear isn't part of the equation.

In fact, that

My interest in these areas started with HAARP.

11

And how many in this room do not know anything about

12

HAARP?

13

Okay.

Well, that's a lot better than it used

14

to be.

15

Twenty years of this work and the work of others have

16

kind of brought this into the public.

17

All right.

It used to be the other way around.

So the first image -- I'm going to use HAARP as

18

sort of the backdrop as I move into the mind control,

19

mind effects-related technology.

20

in my part of the world.

21

know if -- maybe I've come the farthest for this

22

presentation.

23

appreciate the opportunity to inform people about this

24

subject.

25

This is just an image

I come from Alaska.

I don't

But I appreciate being here and I

So HAARP is a large array, a field of antennas

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
265
57
57
57
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page266
58 of
of183
336

in Alaska, currently 180 antennas.

approximately 20 meters tall.

which you can see, which is the very top of these

antennas.

concentrate radiofrequency energy into a relatively

small space.

They're

They have a cross dipole,

And what these are designed to do is focus or

If you think about the energy of a flashlight,

for instance, or a torch, as they say here in Europe, I

shine that against the wall, the beam starts out small,

10

and then it broadens as you get further away from the

11

source.

12

The same is true with radiofrequency energy.

13

You can think about it as an inverted funnel starting

14

here at the transmitter and then spreading out and

15

getting thinner and thinner, less dense, which is why

16

the further you get away from radio broadcast antennas,

17

the weaker and weaker the signal.

18

With HAARP, the opposite occurs.

They have

19

figured out a way through what's called cyclotron

20

resonance, which would be focusing or concentrating the

21

energy.

22

like sort of a cork-screwing kind of motion that got

23

smaller and smaller as you move further and further away

24

from the transmitter.

25

So if you could visualize it, it would look

So it concentrates that energy or focuses that

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
266
58
58
58
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page267
59 of
of183
336

energy so you can manipulate it in various ways.

And so

the HAARP array, which was originally designed by a

gentleman, Bernard Eastlund, who's now deceased, was

intended to do a number of things as a weapons

application.

half the current size of the transmitter in Alaska.

can see the field of antennas.

90 antennas in the array.

9
10
11

This is the earlier version when it was

In this case there were

And here's another image as they expanded the


array to 180.

And another image showing the array.

Now, they also upgraded the technology pretty

12

substantially over the years.

13

efficient.

14

much bigger effects.

15

You

So it became much more

So with a much smaller system you create

So what does it do?

Essentially, it's sending

16

energy or focusing energy up into an area known as the

17

ionosphere, which in this image in miles -- I apologize

18

for that -- is approximately 37 miles to 620 miles out

19

into space.

20

Now, this is a highly energized area.

If you

21

think about radiofrequency signals or shortwave signals,

22

they would come from the earth, they'd bounce off of us,

23

and then bounce back down to the earth to transmit over

24

large distances.

25

The ionosphere also is an area that can be

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
267
59
59
59
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page268
60 of
of183
336

disturbed by solar radiation, radiation from the sun.

When it becomes destabilized, it interferes with

terrestrial communications of every kind.

So part of the idea in this technology was to

learn how to stabilize the ionosphere during these

periods or deliberately disrupt the ionosphere to

interfere with communications on a global basis.

8
9

Now, what caught my interest when I first


looked at this issue of HAARP was a very short article

10

in a publication, an Australian publication, that talked

11

about this big system in Alaska.

12

Now, I come from a family that's pretty

13

politically engaged.

14

Congress, my younger brother just finished a term in the

15

United States Senate.

16

politics a very long time.

17

Besides my dad being in the

My family's been involved in

Alaska is a very big region, but we're a really

18

small population; 700,000 people in our entire region.

19

And when you think about big projects, you know, you

20

think you know something about them.

21

Well, I'm reading about this project in my

22

state in a journal in Australia and I'm going, you know,

23

why doesn't anybody know about this?

24
25

And so I decided I would go in and look into


this issue independently.

And I did.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
268
60
60
60
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

I picked up maybe

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page269
61 of
of183
336

30 articles and papers, design specifications, some

things, and with friends encouraging me to publish, I

published the first article that I had written on HAARP

back in 1994.

So it's been a very long time ago.

What also caught my interest was the idea that

they were primarily utilizing, in some applications,

extremely low frequency signals or ELFs.

signals that can be biologically active, can affect us

as human beings and in very specific ways.

10

These are

And in particular, certain applications of the

11

technology -- and this gives you sort of a graphic

12

illustration of the focus.

13

were given to me by the inventor, Bernard Eastlund,

14

prior to his passing.

15

publications and in some of our work.

16

kind of a graphic showing the radiofrequency from the

17

array, moving up into the ionosphere and focusing that

18

energy.

19

These view graphs, actually,

And we utilized them in our


So this gives you

His initial concept was to create a global

20

shield, to be able to utilize the natural magnetic field

21

lines that surround the earth, be able to punch energy

22

into this and then create this kind of global shielding

23

effect.

24

piercing that energy would be disrupted, like

25

satellites, intercontinental ballistic missiles,

And the idea was that any electronic device

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
269
61
61
61
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page270
62 of
of183
336

virtually any electronic device that ran into this field

of energy that was being amplified would be destroyed.

Now, one of the other interesting parts of

this -- and this kind of shows that, again, utilizing

one of Eastlund's graphics.

line and then you see this cork-screwing energy going

around it.

southern polar regions into the northern polar regions.

And, in this case, they actually couple -- actually

10

utilize the energy on the ground to couple with the

11

natural energy, and then coming from the north to the

12

south, create this cork-screwing effect, which

13

accelerates the electrons and then creates this global

14

shield.

15

So you can see like a field

That energy naturally is occurring from the

Now, that was his initial concept.

And as a

16

concept, it caught the attention of a number of people

17

and eventually got funding from the Congress, initially

18

at 30 million, and over the last few decades now over

19

almost 300 million, which in dollars is not a lot of

20

money, but when you consider, this is sort of the

21

pinnacle of billions of dollars spent in ionosphere

22

research over many decades.

23

What caught my attention in terms of the

24

technology of Eastlund -- I'm going to skip some of

25

these that are not so relevant -- was the idea that you

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
270
62
62
62
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page271
63 of
of183
336

10

could manipulate the ionosphere -- and I'll use this as

a better example.

you could punch or pulse energy into the ionosphere --

so think about this energy going up and, like, a hammer

ringing a bell.

ionosphere itself vibrates and then it begins to send a

signal in the ELF range.

signal going up, punching the ionosphere, the ionosphere

which is energized then acts as a broadcast antenna in

So one of the thoughts was that if

Every time it hits that ionosphere, the

So you have a high frequency

10

the sky bringing back an ELF signal to the earth, and in

11

this case covering an entire hemisphere.

12

Now, ELF signals, extremely low frequency

13

signals, are very long wavelengths.

14

earth and sea.

15

submarines, as an example, the depth, because short

16

wavelengths won't penetrate the earth and sea.

17

also used for what's called earth-penetrating

18

tomography, which in simple language or by analogy would

19

be like x-raying the earth or looking into the earth for

20

underground structures.

21

They penetrate the

They're utilized for communication with

They're

But one of the side effects of ELF is the

22

entrainment effect on the human mind.

Because ELF

23

signals will lock onto in what's called a frequency

24

following response.

25

techniques to create a frequency following response.

And you can use a lot of different

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
271
63
63
63
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page272
64 of
of183
336

11

You can use flickering light, you can use binaural beat,

which I'll explain in a few minutes.

electromagnetic fields such as this, or even the power

grid itself can be modulated in such a way to create a

signal that the human body will join with, will couple

with, and begin to follow.

of energy to accomplish this.

You can use

It doesn't take a great deal

This is the one that triggered my real interest

in HAARP, because this is the one that everybody kind of

10

ignored and said, oh.

11

well, if ELF has a biological effect, it's a side

12

effect.

13

phrase earlier today.

14

believe that it's an intended consequence.

15

intended to grade populations in very specific ways.

16

In fact, the HAARP planners said,

It's an unintended consequence.

We heard that

But I don't believe that.

It's

Now, this book was mentioned by my friend

17

earlier today, "Between Two Ages", by Zbigniew

18

Brzezinski.

19

written, actually, in 1973, when Brzezinski was at

20

Columbia University.

21

Security Adviser to President Carter.

22

the time that Kissinger and he and others were starting

23

to think about the Trilateral Commission organizing this

24

think tank, so to speak.

25

And why this is an important book, it was

This is before he became National

Now, find this book.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
272
64
64
64
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

This is around

I really encourage you to

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page273
65 of
of183
336

find this book and read it, because it is not a

prediction of what will come with technology.

blueprint, in fact.

12

It's the

You can read this.

When I first read it -- he writes in a pretty

convoluted style.

English to understand.

read it because he predicted the economic changes that

took place, the political changes that took place in the

world over the last 40 years with a great deal of

10

accuracy.

11

prediction.

12

It's a little difficult even in


But I really encourage you to

And some will say it really wasn't the


It was the plan.

If you look within this text between Pages 54

13

and 56, you'll see a section that's dedicated to the

14

kind of technologies we're talking about today, a mind

15

control technology.

16

guy named J. F. Gordon MacDonald.

17

geophysicist at UCL.

18

chapter in a book and the chapter was called, "How to

19

Wreck Your Environment", which this is before Earth Day,

20

okay, so he could get away with that.

21

that book was actually published.

22

caught Zbigniew Brzezinski's attention was, he said, if

23

we could ever figure out how to electronically stroke

24

the ionosphere in just the right way, we could return a

25

signal to the earth that would influence the behavior of

And what Zbigniew referenced was a


And he was a

He wrote a book -- or, actually, a

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
273
65
65
65
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

It was 1969 when

But what he said that

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page274
66 of
of183
336

13

people over huge geographic areas.

Now, that's a pretty profound thing.

But we

didn't have a way to stroke the ionosphere in 1969.

we did by the 1990s.

fact, the HAARP system that can accomplish this.

But

And that was, in fact, and is, in

So the idea was -- and it was kind of, in a

gross sort of way, primitive, if you will, but what the

intention was, was that if you could pulse the

ionosphere, return this ELF signal to the earth, you

10

could agitate the population in very specific ways.

11

could make them passive, less aggressive, or the

12

opposite by just amplifying that signal.

13

explain a little bit of that as we go on.

You

And I'll

14

The other person that comes out in the last

15

presentations, Jose Delgado, and this book he wrote,

16

"Physical Control of the Mind:

17

Society".

18

images that you saw in just this short video clip of

19

Delgado's work, there is a good section in this text as

20

well showing that.

21

Toward a Psychocivilized

And this is, again, a 1960s book.

Those

But in those days they used implants.

They had

22

to physically put something in the brain.

And what Jose

23

Delgado originally did -- he was actually educated in

24

electrophysiology at the University of Madrid.

25

graduated in 1950.

He

Electrophysiology, as a degree

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
274
66
66
66
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page275
67 of
of183
336

14

field, thinking about it in 1950, now 65 years ago, most

people don't even realize that's an area of higher

education today, much less that far back.

One of my mentors, Raul Makayla (phonetic), he

actually graduated University of Madrid in 1958, and his

area of interest was, essentially, the same, biomagnetic

and electric fields, effects on human physiology, and he

spent his career studying that.

Delgado, at Yale University, he initially was

10

mapping the brain of primates and humans by stimulating

11

various portions of the brain to figure out what was

12

responsible for what kind of activity.

13

began to utilize the implants in those dramatic ways in

14

those film clips with the charging bull and he throws

15

the switch and the bull stops, to demonstrate that you

16

could take a creature from passive to highly aggressive

17

to passive to highly aggressive, just like flipping on

18

and off the lights in your living room.

19

And then he

What Delgado discovered by the mid-'80s is that

20

you didn't need any implants.

You just needed to

21

manipulate the energy itself.

And you didn't need a

22

great deal of energy.

23

Now, we've heard -- I forget the amount of

24

energy surrounding us now.

Was it a quintillion?

25

believe it was 18 zeros after the one that we heard

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
275
67
67
67
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page276
68 of
of183
336

earlier.

radiofrequency energy alone, it was 200 million times

more around us every day than nature created in 1994.

Back when I wrote the HAARP book in '94, just

Now, when you think about it, what did Delgado

discover?

of energy in the natural background noise of the earth

was sufficient to manipulate the behavior of human

beings if you could hit the right frequencies, if you

could hit those window frequencies that stimulated that

10
11

He discovered that one-fiftieth of the amount

kind of activity.
Now, if you think about this -- again, by

12

analogy, think about dialing through the radio stations

13

on a radio.

14

noise, the static, you get no clear signal.

15

you have resonance between the transmitter and the

16

receiver, then you get a nice, clear signal.

17

The same is true in our physiology.

18

you're looking at stimulating or affecting a specific

19

element in the body, molecules in the body, cell

20

structures or organ structures or even the human mind,

21

it's about manipulating the underlying energy.

22

15

In between the stations you get the white


But when

Whether

When you think about medical science in terms

23

of how the fork in the road is and how this kind of

24

applies to why don't we know more about this today,

25

well, there's lots of literature now.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
276
68
68
68
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

25,000 sources, I

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page277
69 of
of183
336

think we heard quoted earlier today.

talking about the energy interactions with the human

body.

25,000 sources

That is a lot of information.

But what happened in medical science?

A lot of

people that went into life sciences, they were really

good in the chemistry, a little weak in the math, so

they went to life sciences.

better in the math, they went to physics.

upon a time, these two came together and we got

People who were a little


And then once

10

biophysics, which is really the root of real health

11

science.

12

you've got to get to the energetic interactions that

13

create chemical reactions that then manifest in the

14

body.

15

16

If you really want to get to the meat of it,

And that's what we kind of miss in so much of

16

our medicine.

17

opposed to an electromagnetic model.

18

to World War II, that fork in the road was being

19

explored pretty aggressively, the energetic models.

20

they were somehow lost in that shuffle and we ended up

21

with the pharmaceutical industry, and the results of

22

that, I think we can all not be quite so proud of.

23

We followed a pharmaceutical model as


In the '30s, prior

But

In terms of where the technology is going and

24

where a lot of the science is going, it will be

25

electromedicine that cures most of what we call

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
277
69
69
69
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page278
70 of
of183
336

incurable.

debilitates human consciousness itself.

It will also be that which enhances or

Now, Jose Delgado, when he figured out that you

didn't need implants, you just need to manipulate the

energy itself, this became kind of the essence of sort

of where everything went from there.

17

But I want to roll back a little bit, a little

bit back in time, and talk more about the evolution of

mind control as technology starting with the work at

10

Harvard University of a gentleman, Estabrook, who was

11

working in the Harvard hypnotherapy labs in the 1920s.

12

You can look Estabrook up.

13

of Congress and you'll see his list of publications, and

14

I recommend that you do that.

15

Look him up at the Library

What he decided was that you could create what

16

we would call today a Manchurian candidate.

17

take certain individuals, put them in a very, very deep

18

state of hypnosis and then over a period of time train

19

them so they would be like this super spy that you could

20

send into another country and they'd hang out for a year

21

or two, but if they got captured, they wouldn't really

22

remember any of their former self, and then when they

23

came back, in this case, into the United States, that we

24

would then give them the appropriate suggestions and

25

then extract the intelligence from them.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
278
70
70
70
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

You could

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page279
71 of
of183
336

18

And this is what Estabrook was working on.

By

the 1930s, a lot of his work was being classified and he

continued to work in this field up through the 1960s.

His last book -- and I always like to read the last

thing someone writes, you know, because it tells you a

lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there are things

that you might discard bits and pieces as science

enlightens you and your experience enlightens you.

what he talked about in that last book were the

10

experiments he was involved in using LSD and other

11

hallucinogenics in mind control, which he actually

12

talked about in a favorable sense.

13

And

And for those of you that remember, the CIA was

14

heavily involved in this in the 1960s and, in fact, the

15

whole area pre-1960s going back even to the Korean War,

16

which is sort of my next mark on the timeline.

17

The Korean War, we had prisoners, patriotic

18

young Americans come back from war and they're handing

19

out Communist leaflets on street corners, and the term

20

or the phrase brainwashing came into being.

21

where it came from.

22

after the Korean War.

23

That's

It came from that series of events

The idea of being able to manipulate people's

24

behavior and change them so profoundly became of

25

interest to the predecessor of the Central Intelligence

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
279
71
71
71
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page280
72 of
of183
336

Agency and then later the Central Intelligence Agency.

And what they looked at were lots of different ways to

manipulate human behavior.

19

Now, when I was researching my first book with

Jeane Manning, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", I was

looking for a good source document that would speak to

this, because you always read about this in secondary,

tertiary sources.

surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy that I know,

And so I'm in a book room, a big

10

I really need this source.

11

conversation, I reach unconsciously behind me into a box

12

and I pull out this book.

13

And as I'm having this

This is a really interesting one.

This is

14

actually a presidential report.

15

was commissioned at the time, 1975, to look at the

16

abuses of the CIA.

17

Committee reports, which were Congressional hearings

18

that took place in the early '70s to investigate the

19

abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency, the kind of

20

abuses that we read about today, because nothing really

21

changed.

22

This is a report that

Now, this came out of the Church

Supposedly, this was to change things.


Now, what's in this report?

The LSD

23

experiments were in this report.

24

Intelligence Agency was domestically infiltrating civil

25

rights groups, antiwar groups, people that, essentially,

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
280
72
72
72
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

The idea the Central

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page281
73 of
of183
336

20

opposed the government within the United States, which

was not part of their mandate, in fact, was illegal.

The fact that they were reading people's mail, utilizing

unwitting victims and experiments for mind control.

of this came out in this report in 1975.

CIA continues to do it even to this day.

All

And yet, the

Think about the kinds of activities that have

been reported pretty widely over the last few years,

whether it's digging through garbage to blackmail other

10

diplomats, which is something our Intelligence community

11

does, whether it's to send pallet loads of money into

12

countries like we did in Afghanistan to bribe officials

13

as a way of doing business, or whether it's to

14

assassinate people with drones, kidnap people and

15

torture them.

16

Now, most of us don't know people like this,

17

but this is the government that I unfortunately have

18

guiding my country right now.

19

criminals.

20

couldn't happen here.

21

It's a government of

Now, people want to talk about, oh, this

It has happened here.

It's happened for

22

decades in the United States.

23

President's Commission touches the very tip of that

24

iceberg.

25

This report by the

This is another document.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
281
73
73
73
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

This is -- this guy,

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page282
74 of
of183
336

21

Captain Tyler, he later became a colonel and retired.

He was involved in pretty much the sort of esoteric side

of some of the government research.

chapter out of this book is called, "Low-Intensity

Conflict and Modern Technology".

Maxwell Air Force Base in 1984.

about a large -- a variety of technologies.

8
9

This book -- this

It was prepared by
And it was talking

But in this particular one, if you look at,


certainly, the subject lines, you have stimulation of ,

10

bones* generation, healing of fractures, treatment of

11

disease, healing of wounds.

12

modification in animals.

13

that are listed here were kind of under the mysterious

14

category.

15

happening in 1984.

16

You look at behavior

You know, some of these things

They couldn't really explain what was

But the idea was to stimulate research in these

17

fields.

So a number of things happened.

A lot of money

18

started to flow into these areas.

19

that came out in the 1980s as a result of some of this

20

was the Radiofrequency Dosimetry Handbook.

21

big, thick handbook.

22

of Utah under contract to the United States Air Force to

23

determine the radiofrequency dosages that were required

24

to override every vital organ of the human body, whether

25

it be the heart, the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, just

One of the reports

It was a

It was produced by the University

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
282
74
74
74
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page283
75 of
of183
336

22

sort of preempt their natural function to be able to do

it remotely.

And the idea was to take that leap of

technology and begin to apply it into weapon systems.

Mind control.

you will remember this one.

Yeah, 2002.

about the ethics of mind control.

it exist or doesn't it exist?

"The Economist".

Cover story.

Some of

This is 2002, I believe.

And what this cover story was about was


Not saying, hey, does

It's just saying it's

10

here right now.

11

we should advance this technology, whether we should

12

limit this technology.

13

credible publication.

14

story.

15

We really need to be debating whether

"The Economist" is certainly a


Not too much happened from this

This is -- unfortunately, it's not showing up.

16

November -- you can get this one on my website.

I'll

17

give you my website, because this is a very important

18

document.

19

human experiments.

20

in history, that's like tomorrow and yesterday, right?

21

It's, like, now.

22

mind control experiments and who has the authority to

23

approve them.

24

approve them is under secretaries of the Navy in the

25

case of Navy Intelligence or Naval research.

The Navy set up a new set of regulations for


It was approved in 2006.

You know,

And in this they specifically call out

And the persons with the authority to

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
283
75
75
75
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page284
76 of
of183
336

Now, it's not just CIA.

23

Naval Intelligence

does this work.

non-lethal weapons that this falls under.

has the electromagnetic directorate, which is working in

an area called controlled effects, which deal, again,

with mind control and physiological effects on human

beings.

"Technology Horizons".

issue.

10

The Marines have a section on


The Air Force

In fact, they publish a publication called


I believe it's the June 2004

You can look it up.

The cover story is on

controlled effects.

11

Now, what are controlled effects?

The first

12

effect is attacking hardware; you know, like equipment,

13

like machines, to be able to interfere with the flow of

14

electrons through circuits to disrupt those machines to

15

operate.

16

history, but using energy itself to manipulate hardware.

17

Not using bombs and bullets and the things of

The second sort of level of controlled effects

18

talked about in that article is the idea of manipulating

19

the software, the systems that run those systems, so

20

that you can disrupt the software, then you disrupt the

21

hardware, and things collapse.

22

And the third leg of controlled effects is the

23

human operator.

And what they say in this particular

24

article produced by the electromagnetic director of the

25

Air Force is that we can target or create the illusion

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
284
76
76
76
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page285
77 of
of183
336

of all of the senses in the human body; sight, sound,

touch, taste, to give people complete memory sets,

complete experiential sets that you wouldn't be able to

distinguish the synthetic from the real.

Now, think about that for a moment.

24

What does

that do to court testimony in 20 years if this becomes

the norm?

post-traumatic stress syndrome folks, people coming back

from warfare.

They're now talking about using this for

This just sort of cleans up the garbage

10

of the mind and gets rid of that stress.

11

think that's a great idea.

12

the biggest mistake we could ever make.

13

whatever those servicemen and women were engaged in --

14

what used to happen in warfare -- what happened in World

15

War II when everybody came back, they said, I don't ever

16

want to see my children in these things, I don't want to

17

see my grandchildren in these things.

18

put down, not amplified.

19

Some people

Personally, I think that's


Because

Wars need to be

When you take the human factor out of warfare

20

and it becomes like a videogame, then our willingness to

21

withdraw from direct conflict no longer happens.

22

And think about where our military science has

23

gone.

In fact, I want to mention another very important

24

publication.

25

in the early 1980s.

It was produced by the US Army War College


It's called the "Revolution of

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
285
77
77
77
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page286
78 of
of183
336

Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War".

particular paper was talking about revolution of

military affairs.

And this

What is that exactly?

This is a leap as important as the introduction

of gunpowder in the middle ages in Europe, as important

as atomic weapons in the last century.

they characterize it.

where we move from ordinance, from bullets, bombs,

things that rip tissue and tear things up, to

And that's how

And what this is is the leap

10

electromagnetic weapon systems that keep sort of the

11

hardware intact, but debilitate the human operator to

12

the point of being combat ineffective.

13

enhance the possibilities within our own combatants

14

while degrading the abilities of others.

15

Or conversely,

There's simple ways that you can achieve this.

16

You can introduce to the battlefield certain elemental

17

compounds that in small background amounts would not be

18

considered dangerous.

19

example.

20

body to maintain thyroid function.

21

much iodine, you'll get poisoned.

22

get sick.

23

25

Let me give you iodine as an

We all need a certain amount of iodine in the

So what can you do?

But if you have too


You'll die.

You'll

You can send a signal in

24

that resonates the very same signal strength and

25

frequency as iodine, you can send that signal in and the

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
286
78
78
78
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page287
79 of
of183
336

26

body will begin to react as if its gotten this massive

load of iodine and show all the symptoms of iodine

poisoning.

You check the thyroid; check the blood, it's

not there.

Mystery illness.

Something as simple as that for manipulating

large populations, not necessarily with their consent

and not necessarily with clear knowledge, and nothing

shows up in the background that would say why this

poison actually exists that would account for this.

10
11

simple way.
One of the other ways that this technology can

12

be exploited is really quite simple.

13

article produced by "Parameters", which is a military

14

publication.

15

the -- I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you can look

16

up the article name called, "The Mind has no Firewall".

17

It's a very important article.

18

about all the various ways in which you could introduce

19

mind effects or mind control technologies using modern

20

technology today.

21

written in a military journal called "Orienteer"

22

published in what is now Russia.

23

"Parameters".

There was an

You can look it up.

It's

This article talked

And the original article was actually

What's interesting about this is it said you

24

could use any electromagnetic carrier, whether it be

25

radio, TV, the Internet, now cell phones; but,

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
287
79
79
79
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page288
80 of
of183
336

27

essentially, any of these carriers, you can modulate a

signal on them that will manipulate behavior of segments

of the population.

And the Russians demonstrated this in a couple

of different ways.

There was a program.

It was called

"Undercurrents".

Canadian Public Broadcasting System.

did two really interesting stories that I got to

participate in.

It aired in the CBC, which is the


"Undercurrents"

One was on HAARP and the other was on

10

mind control.

And on the mind control story that they

11

did -- this was a very popular program in Canada at the

12

time and this particular segment was their highest rated

13

that they had ever run.

14

who were involved in the "Star Wars" initiative during

15

the Reagan Administration that couldn't talk about what

16

they did in the White House, but they could talk about

17

what they observed in Russia.

And they had folks that came in

18

And one of the things that they talked about

19

was the idea that you could -- you could create, sort

20

of, this white noise and on this white noise carry a

21

signal.

22

cake.

23

these little cakes?

24

of Europe as well.

25

And so they put out this message, bring us


And Russians at tea time, you know, they eat
I guess you do that in other parts

And so at the appointed time they began to

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
288
80
80
80
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page289
81 of
of183
336

broadcast this.

and on the street were bringing cake into the meeting

room without really knowing why they were doing it.

They just felt like doing it.

what they were programmed to do.

And workers from within that building

Now, this goes back.

Well, that was, in fact,

We're talking about

15-year-old technology.

of where did it go from there, in 2006, there were a

couple contracts left by DARPA, which does research for

And when you think about sort

10

the defense industry in the United States.

And DARPA

11

used to be run by a guy named Tony Tether.

Tony Tether

12

was a good friend of Ben Eastlund's.

13

Now, what they were doing then was, they had

14

left two contracts to the University of California for

15

what's called electronic telepathy.

16

telepathy.

17

a distance by analyzing the emanations coming from this

18

area, being able to analyze that and determine and

19

interpret what it is.

20

contract was to create complex signals to see if you

21

could transfer that array, so to speak, of signals into

22

another person's consciousness and whether they would

23

perceive the same images.

24
25

28

Okay.

Electronic

The idea of reading another person's mind at

And then the other half of the

Now, there was work done by Elizabeth Rauscher


and her late husband, Bill Van Bise, in this very same

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
289
81
81
81
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page290
82 of
of183
336

29

area.

In fact, I have a copy of their unpublished paper

where they actually built an electronic circuit where

they could take a person in one room and a person in

another room, attach this person to that circuit and

this person to that circuit, and then, you know, the

psychic card where they show the triangles, the squares

and the circles and the little squiggly lines, a hundred

percent accurate with nine test subjects who had never

experienced consciously in any way any sense of

10

extrasensory perceptions or psychic perceptions.

11

did it with hardware, transferring thoughts from one to

12

the other.

13

They

Now -- which tells me it's probably a little

14

more simple than what DARPA's doing.

But when Ben

15

Eastlund was doing work on HAARP and he was doing other

16

work for DARPA at the time and we had talked about him

17

in our first publication, and then actually after

18

publication became friends, and Ben Eastlund's attitude

19

was, you know, some things just shouldn't be done.

20

one of the things that he had been working on was

21

whether modification technologies, which he was at that

22

time and when we first met, making that technology

23

available to the military.

24

us and others, he decided there's certain technologies

25

that are not safe in the hands of military.

And

And after some dialogue with

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
290
82
82
82
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page291
83 of
of183
336

30

At one point along the course I began doing

quite a bit of work on this whole mind effects issue.

And I caught the attention of a woman, Dorothy Lay.

Now, Dorothy is one of the heirs to the Lay, as in

Frito-Lay and PepsiCo Corporation.

family.

specifically as it applied to victims.

So a very wealthy

Dorothy was very interested in this technology

And so she approached me at one point and asked

if I would become a member of her board of directors for

10

a non-profit that she was setting up to deal with these

11

kinds of technologies.

12

whether I should tell you the rest of this story, and I

13

think I will, because why not?

14

And I've got to think about

So I have this thing, intuition.

All of us

15

have it.

16

do today.

17

listen, because when I really think about it, it's never

18

been wrong.

19

about it.

20

start acting on it.

21

I used to not pay as much attention to it as I


When my intuition tells me something, I

Neither has yours, if you really think


Or maybe you don't think about it and just

So my intuition said -- and this was a very

22

difficult time for me in 2002.

In 2002, I had been

23

betrayed by a very good friend, economically was

24

bankrupt in the middle of this work, because I started

25

this work in '94.

Economically was being crushed.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
291
83
83
83
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

And

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page292
84 of
of183
336

31

at that point I was deciding whether I was going to stay

in this work at all.

And I'm going through a bunch of my files and I

see this file and it's marked Lay.

person had contacted us needing some information and we

provided it.

way we operated is, I sold books.

bought my books.

And I remember this

And we never charge for that.

I mean, the

And people like you

And they allowed me to do this work.

I didn't write for grants where somebody could

10

manipulate me and control me and tell me what to say.

11

didn't go out and find some publisher that would edit

12

out my work.

13

book.

14

that work by buying that book.

15

two and a half million dollars and I spent that two and

16

a half million dollars over 20 years doing what I'm

17

doing right now.

I risked my own money.

I published my

And then I asked people to help me by supporting

18

A VOICE:

19

(Applause.)

20

DR. BEGICH:

And I tell you, I made

Thank you.

And the whole idea was just to

21

educate.

I didn't deal with victims.

Okay.

And the

22

reason I didn't was because I felt that that was putting

23

the cart before the horse.

24

people that the technology is real, that this could

25

really happen to people and from that foundation, and

We first need to educate

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
292
84
84
84
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page293
85 of
of183
336

32

that became the foundation of my work in this.

So Dorothy calls me on the phone and she says,

will you be on my board?

an hour.

on your board.

And I talked to her for about

At the end of the hour, I said, no, I can't be

She said, well, why not?

I said, because my intuition is telling me I

8
9
10

really can't be on your board.


And she goes, well, I deserve more than that.
I said, okay.

I don't know your board members,

11

I don't know who your board is, but something in here is

12

saying there's a problem there and I don't want to be

13

associated with them.

14

(Applause.)

15

DR. BEGICH:

16

I got the call back.

17

you have millions.

18

what they say they're doing.

19

being done and find out for yourself.

20

diligence again.

21

So it was a couple of months later


Because I told her also, I said,
You have the ability.

And she did.

Go see if it's really


Do your due

A couple months later she came

22

back and she said, you were right.

23

me a number of ways.

24

just me now and my attorney.

25

Go research

They were defrauding

I've cleared out my board.

It's

Will you be on my board?

Now, bear in mind, I'm in a pretty desperate

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
293
85
85
85
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page294
86 of
of183
336

situation economically.

children at home.

have an economy that I've got to manage.

Dorothy, no, I can't be on your board.

33

At the time I have five

I've got people to take care of.


And I tell

She says, well, why not?

I said, well, I need to meet you first in

person, eyeball to eyeball.

for three days.

foundation.

I said, we're going to talk

We're not going to talk about your

I want to know everything I'm ever going to

10

read about you and your family in the newspaper.

11

you to have the same knowledge level of me.

12

to know what your world view is before I join with you

13

in achieving that world view, because you have the means

14

and I have the willingness if that world view is shared.

15

So we spent a few days.

I want

And I want

We decided that I

16

could do this.

17

And we put together, as her major effort was, a

18

conference on mind effects.

19

public.

20

bring some key people together to have a conversation

21

that would be open and free.

22

And for four years I worked with her.

But it wasn't open to the

It was closed to the public.

And it was to

And one of those people I invited was Ben

23

Eastlund, who by then I'd gotten to know, had watched

24

what he had done in terms of his career.

25

connected with DARPA at the time.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
294
86
86
86
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

He was well

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page295
87 of
of183
336

34

And I called him and I said, you know, Ben,

would you consider participating in this conference?

And he said, you know, if you had asked me this

seven or eight years ago, on a scale of one to ten, ten

being the relevance and importance of this, and one

being irrelevant and unimportant, I would have given

this a one or a two.

time I talk to Tony Tether or others at DARPA, nobody's

laughing about mind control anymore and it's a nine or a

10

He goes, but -- he goes, every

ten and, yes, I'll participate in your conference.

11

The next person I asked was Garth Nicolson.

12

Does that name ring any bells for anybody?

13

Nicolson was a full professor, I believe it was Texas

14

A&M.

15

thousand medical students.

16

whistle on Gulf War Syndrome and testified in our

17

Congress six times before his wife was fired as a

18

molecular biologist from Texas A&M.

19

they couldn't fire him.

20

him, because he was one of the first courageously enough

21

to step up to the plate and complain about what had been

22

happening in the Gulf War; we depleted uranium and some

23

of the other technologies that were being applied there.

24
25

He taught medical students.

Okay.

Garth

He taught over a

He was the guy that blew the

And he was tenured;

But they definitely harassed

Well, the best thing that ever happened to him


was he got out of the university system.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
295
87
87
87
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

He formed a

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page296
88 of
of183
336

35

nonprofit to deal with chronic disease.

somebody that I watched maintain his course under really

difficult circumstances.

conference.

And he was

So he was invited to that

I invited the daughter of my mentor, Raul

Makayla.

one of the boards in Russia that regulates medical

applications of lasers.

Quite brilliant.

10

She's an electrophysiologist.

She serves on

She's an electrophysiologist.

We invited her.

We invited Rosalie Bertell.


Okay.

Does anyone

11

remember Rosalie Bertell?

12

passed.

13

physicist, biologist.

14

doctoral students at Berkeley.

15

It's kind of an odd combination.

16

statistician to go in to Bhopal for the World Health

17

Organization after that huge chemical disaster.

18

was considered one of the top people in the world for

19

dealing with victims of radiological experiments,

20

including electromagnetic radiation.

21

some of our work and added to it and published a book on

22

the HAARP system and its effect on human beings on this

23

sort of broad scale.

24

been through some really difficult times as well, rose

25

out of her own ashes and maintained her ethical

Also deceased now.

A few.

Rosalie's

She was a mathematician,

She taught higher mathematics to


She was also a nun.
She was the lead

But she

She actually took

So we had invited Rosalie, who had

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
296
88
88
88
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page297
89 of
of183
336

1
2

36

platform.
The other person we invited was Alexander

Kaivarainen.

Does anybody recognize that name?

He was

the former head of the USSR Academy of Science

Biophysics Department for ten years.

area that really gets into the meat of what we're

talking about here today.

believe, is deceased now also.

guys, you know, they're a lot older than me and they

And this is the

Now, what got -- Alex, I


You know, all these

10

keep dying of old age.

11

science at a young age watching a demonstration of the

12

paranormal, ESP, telepathy, these kinds of things in

13

Russia when he was a teenager.

14

caught his interest.

15

But Alex got his stimulation in

And it just really

When I met Alex, he was in his 60s and he was

16

the brightest top five physicists on the planet,

17

recognized by institutions around the world.

18

he had determined is that there were rational reasons

19

for why these things manifested.

20

this conference and actually presented a paper giving

21

the mathematics and the physics that lends itself to

22

these extrasensory possibilities, these things that the

23

military now calls anomalous human capabilities.

24

used to call it extrasensory perception or ESP, but now

25

they give it a new name because there's a lot of

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
297
89
89
89
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

And what

So he was invited to

We

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page298
90 of
of183
336

37

connotations with that that kind of get you discredited

in certain segments of the scientific community.

So I want to talk -- roll back again a little

bit -- I want to talk about binaural beat, which I had

mentioned earlier in this presentation.

around a little bit.

not even use these things, but I think people feel more

comfortable using them.

And I jump

It's kind of my style.

The binaural beat.

I used to

We can't hear these really,

10

really low frequency signals, because the human ear

11

doesn't quite work that way.

12

the human ear won't hear.

Below a certain frequency,

13

Now, a gentleman by the name of Robert Monroe

14

developed a method using binaural beat where you could

15

send in a signal within the range of human hearing, say,

16

at 15,000 Hertz or pulses per second or cycles per

17

second, coming in one ear at, say, 15,000, another

18

signal coming in the other ear at, say, 15,007.

19

the cranium they will cancel each other out and leave a

20

beat frequency of seven, the difference between the two.

21

15,000, 15,007.

22

seven pulses per second, which happens to be in the

23

upper Theta range, and this is where the brain then

24

drives to.

25

Within

The beat frequency becomes seven Hertz,

At the same time that that occurs, you get a

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
298
90
90
90
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page299
91 of
of183
336

hemispheric balance, a distribution of energy across

both hemispheres of the brain, the analytical side and

the creative side and working together.

actually how human beings are supposed to function.

This is how young children predominantly function, with

more of a balance between the hemispheres, where the

energy is more balanced.

8
9

38

This is

And then we educate them.

And with young girls, who we say are more


intuitive and have this other operation of the brain,

10

and young boys are more analytical, and now we kind of

11

treat everybody the same so we kind of dumb them all

12

down to the same level.

13

children and you look at where their brain activity is

14

and between 3 and, say, 5 or 6 years old, they have

15

this predominant brain frequencies or a lot of Theta

16

brain frequencies coming in and then some ELF and then

17

higher frequency ranges.

18

But when you look at young

Now, what is Theta?

Theta states if we're in a

19

Theta state, we're kind of like in that dream-like state

20

between awake and asleep where you're consciously aware

21

of your dreams.

22

good deal of their time.

23

as we call it, are so active.

24

don't pay attention to that, don't pay attention to

25

that.

That's where 3 to 5 year olds spend a


That's why their imaginations,
And we keep saying, oh,

This was our first attempt to shut down the

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
299
91
91
91
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page300
92 of
of183
336

39

intuitive combinations of the way the brain is actually

supposed to work.

In fact, for those who have a Christian

background, you know Jesus Christ himself said, look at

the little children, watch what they do.

think I heard somebody say something about this earlier,

little children come to the table kind of innocent with

a view of the world that's quite different than the rest

of ours.

You know, I

But the brain activity of children is unique

10

and we begin to take that out of them in the structure

11

of the way we educate.

12

So what Robert Monroe -- he was actually a

13

radio engineer.

14

had this really weird experience.

15

body experience, that he had that kind of threw him.

16

You know, it didn't make any sense to him.

17

began -- he also noticed that in the background there

18

was this kind of noise that he perceived.

19

He owned a bunch of radio stations.

He

It's an OBE, an outer

So he

So he began to experiment and he created this

20

technique for binaural beat.

He developed a whole

21

series.

22

binaural beat.

23

those US patents from 1994, and this is showing the

24

brain before the activity, before turning on the

25

Hemi-Sync, and this is after, showing a more even

In fact, he actually got US patents on a


This is an image taken out of one of

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
300
92
92
92
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page301
93 of
of183
336

distribution in a more rhythmic pattern in the

brainwaves as you see in the upper right-hand corner.

Let me roll back again so you can kind of see

the comparison.

activities happening all through the brain, and then a

coherent signal creating a hemispheric balance and an

optimization of brain potential.

8
9

40

Normal brain, kind of disorganized

So what did he do with this?

He developed a

whole series of things; audio input technology,

10

essentially, to manipulate behavior, but where you're in

11

control of that manipulation.

12

smoking, you get his CD on quit smoking.

13

brain in such a way, becomes compelling, very affective.

14

So you want to quit


It affects the

Sleep disorders can be addressed in this way.

15

They have someone be able to relax, meditation,

16

concentration, accelerated learning.

17

things can be done.

18

over the course of many, many, many, many years, and now

19

his daughter doing the work of working with thousands of

20

people to determine which signals actually created which

21

effects and then developing technology that they could

22

place in the hands of individuals to make the choice on

23

how to use it.

24
25

A whole array of

And they did this by working with,

Now, that's kind of an interesting way of


looking at technology.

It was my area of interest, in

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
301
93
93
93
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page302
94 of
of183
336

the beginning of all of this work, was not looking for

the dark side of all of this, but in the mid-'80s I got

very interested in light and sound stimulation of the

brain that capitalized on sound signals and flickering

light for brain entrainment.

the brain will follow that external signal or what's

called FFR, frequency following response.

little energy.

Entrain the brain where

So very

Let me roll back to Delgado again.

10

One-fiftieth of the amount of energy the earth creates

11

is sufficient to move your brain into very specific

12

states.

13

just another technique for altering brain activity that

14

might be beneficial, but you're in control of it, not

15

somebody else.

16

Dialing that radio up, if you will.

This is

I'm going to skip some of these just because

17

they're not so relevant.

18

images and let me just go back into the whole dialogue

19

of this, mind effects.

20

And I'm going to close the

When I think about sort of where do we go with

21

this conference, when we put that conference together

22

with the Lay Institute, our purpose was to put together

23

these really good thinkers to try and see if we could

24

create a synergy between them.

25

41

And when I first got interested in doing

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
302
94
94
94
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page303
95 of
of183
336

42

something actively in science, it wasn't about HAARP and

it wasn't about mind control.

would play -- and I was working in a government office

at the time, and it was -- my friend said, you make your

living with your left foot.

living, but the rest of my creativity could be engaged

elsewhere and me working in bureaucracy was really a bad

match.

The role that I thought I

Because I could make my

But the point was, my youngest son, when I was

10

getting really frustrated with my work, said, change

11

channels.

12

You know, I'm thinking about this, because I

13

had just given him this discussion about creativity was

14

like changing the channels on the TV set, right, and so

15

he's feeding it back, time to change the channels, Dad.

16

So I thought about it.

And what I decided I

17

would do is -- I read independently in science over 20

18

years.

19

say, one guy in one branch of science.

20

if this person could ever meet that person, you could

21

really see something happen.

22

I had read some really compelling things from,


I thought, boy,

And the first paper I actually ever presented

23

in science, I was 19 and it was at another obscure

24

conference that I ended up in on biorhythm research.

25

And my paper was contrasting at that time the Soviet

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
303
95
95
95
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page304
96 of
of183
336

43

method of research versus the US method.

method was compartmentalization, separate.

distill things down to the smallest subspecialty and

then push these people into a corner and let them do

this bit of the research.

other people over here and ten other groups over there

and fifteen groups over there, and somewhere all of this

stuff comes together and it gets really sloppy.

It's sloppy because there's a lot of repetition; it's

10

Now, the US
You know,

And then you've got nine

Okay.

very expensive.

11

Now, the Russians, Soviets at the time, they

12

didn't have the money for that kind of research, to

13

spread it out that way, and they used a very different

14

method.

15

fields, even though they didn't seem like they should

16

connect.

17

together to develop science.

18

at the exposures that we had seen earlier, what are the

19

regulatory exposures of electromagnetic fields, the

20

Russians in the '90s and the '80s were a thousand times

21

more stringent than they were in the US.

22

They took experts from all of these different

They put them in the same room to work

Well, why was it?

That's why when you look

Because they had actually

23

made the observations that we hadn't made and actually

24

connected the dots in a way to say, hey, this is

25

dangerous.

That doesn't mean they followed their own

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
304
96
96
96
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page305
97 of
of183
336

regulations, because they probably didn't.

whatever was expeditious there.

recognized the physiological responses to

electromagnetic fields and the fact that you could

manipulate it.

44

They did

But at least they

What was discovered by a guy named Allan Frey,

he was looking at microwaves, and he discovered that

there's this flickering effect, but it only occurred

when you pulse-modulated the signal.

And if you look

10

at -- I heard earlier, it's always scalars.

11

scalars.

12

fields as we think about them.

13

It's not vectors.

It's always

It's not electromagnetic

But if you look at the ones that affect human

14

psychology and physiology, if you look at those signals,

15

they have a very quick rise time and a very fast drop.

16

They're like the punch, like punching that ionosphere to

17

create the ELF.

18

modulations on these other carriers are meant to trigger

19

that effect by you entraining to that pulse, that

20

firing, or some submodulation being carried on a general

21

carrier.

22

It's like those signals.

Those

Now, if you remember the first Gulf War, the

23

first Bush War, and you remember how the Iraqi Army just

24

sort of gave up.

25

just like school children on their first fire drill

The fourth largest Army in the world

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
305
97
97
97
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page306
98 of
of183
336

throwing their hands up and surrendering, you know,

thousands of guys to a few dozen.

Now, I speculated on this.

45

What was that about?


And then it was

Scottish media that later reported on this and said it

was Project Solo, which was a project operated by the

United States.

flying over the country at the time and it was taking

and piggybacking the signal on the radio broadcast going

into the region that were broadcasting the Muslim music

10
11

And what we did is we had this C-130

and prayers.
So all these guys are in their bunkers

12

listening to their favorite radio station.

Unbeknownst

13

to them, the subsignals being played on that broadcast

14

created anxiety, high levels of anxiety and fear.

15

then you watched this Army just collapse under this.

16

And that was kind of the -- in my view, the

And

17

first test of could you really do this, could you do it

18

in this adversarial environment.

19

And one of my friends joked, hey, it's the

20

perfect Republican weapon, right?

You can keep all the

21

hardware in place, but totally wipe out the population.

22

Zbigniew Brzezinski said, in between two ways,

23

it doesn't matter if it's Republicans or Conservatives.

24

They just use different rationale for accomplishing

25

their political ends.

On the conservative side, the

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
306
98
98
98
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document89
60 Filed
Filed07/12/16
06/05/16 Page
Page307
99 of
of183
336

Neocon side, it might be the fascination with gadgetry

and new technology, as Zbigniew Brzezinski said, and on

the liberal side it might be the idea that we're doing

this for your own good.

And we've all heard that before.

46

The government is here, right?

The fact of the matter is, when you start

thinking about mind control technologies as a concept,

the idea that someone believes that they can interfere

with your free will, this is something that most

10

religions in the world say God won't even do.

11

think this is their appropriate direction in technology,

12

to interfere with the way consciousness flows.

13

Yet, men

Now, think about for a moment what are the

14

things that -- what is the easiest way to manipulate

15

consciousness?

16

Create an environment of anxiety and fear.

17

happens at that point is you cannot reach your higher

18

states of consciousness.

19

The easiest way, the simplest way.


Because what

If you look at Monroe, rhythmic patterns in the

20

Hemi-Sync as an example, higher states of consciousness

21

are associated with those rhythmic patterns within the

22

brain; not that incoherent scattering of death and

23

information and energy.

24
25

So if you create a certain environment of fear


and anxiety and you look at an EEG monitor and the brain

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
307
99
99
99
of
of
of
of
189
173
183
336
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 100
308 of 183
336

activity of an individual, you see it's kind of

scattered in patterns.

higher emotions; love, compassion.

rhythmic patterns.

47

One person is experiencing


You begin to see

Another simple way of seeing is something that

you can actually measure.

Take two people that are in

love and they -- you know the saying, and I looked into

her eyes, right?

another individual and hold that gaze, you'll begin to

If you actually gaze into the eyes of

10

mirror each other's brain activity in a pretty unique

11

way.

12

long enough.

Two people's breathing begins to

13

synchronize.

Their energy fields begin to synchronize.

Your breathing will even synchronize if you do it

14

And at the same time, their awareness, their

15

intuitions elevate and their rhythmic patterns in the

16

brain can be seen.

17

fear -- think about the advertising you see on

18

television.

19

breath is, you know?

20

uncomfortable.

21

If you can create an environment of

It's all about how you smell, how your


It's all these things to make you

Think about the 6:00 news.

Now, we heard

22

someone talk about the 6:00 news and how that kind of

23

works.

24

people sit down in front of the television set.

25

already fatigued.

You come home from a hard day at work.

Most
They're

They begin to watch the television.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
100
308
100
100
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 101
309 of 183
336

48

And then their spouse hollers, it's time for dinner;

it's time for dinner.

right?

they're in a light trance-like state.

How many of you've been there,

Nobody's listening.

No one's hearing.

Because

Now, if you look in a dark room -- the

television is here -- look behind you at the white wall

and look at the flicker rate.

coherent signal within a certain range through the optic

nerves, your brain will lock onto that signal.

If that flicker rate is a

If you

10

monitor the brain activity at that time, you'll drop

11

into this highly-suggestive state and now you listen to

12

the advertising.

13

Now, every school of psychology teaches

14

frequency following response today and that you can

15

create these kinds of effects.

16

advertising?

17

advertising works so well.

18

convincing and compelling.

19

Would they apply in

Of course they would.

That's why

It works because it's

When you look at the 6:00 news, would somebody

20

utilize that in broadcasting the news of the latest

21

propaganda from whatever source it's coming from?

22

would speculate -- today I would speculate and say yes.

23

When you think about how simple it is to create

24

that agitation.

There was a person at Valencia

25

University who published a paper in 1995 talking about

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
101
309
101
101
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 102
310 of 183
336

49

this whole concept.

could create a complex signal, broadcast it out over a

large area that just created the sense that something's

not right.

And what he said back then was you

Unease.

And then you go watch the 6:00 news and they

indict some specific ethnic group, maybe it's Muslims,

and then a certain amount of that anger gets diverted

that way.

decided on the laser edge of populations, on majorities,

Well, in a day where a lot of things are

10

this is a very, very powerful tool and one quite simple

11

tool to apply in the modern world.

12

When you think about news feeds today, how much

13

is really investigative reporting and how much of it is

14

just spitting out somebody's press release, right?

15

little investigative reporting today because it's

16

expensive, because it's not immediate, and when you look

17

at the news media today, it's almost immediate and most

18

of it is just meant to entertain.

19

inform.

20

Very

It's not meant to

You know, freedom of the press, it used to have

21

something to do with keeping an informed public so we

22

could make good decisions and we could govern as a

23

public.

24

Say whatever you want, say it however you want, but

25

nobody takes responsibility and we have the neutered

Today we debate the media as freedom of speech.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
102
310
102
102
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 103
311 of 183
336

neutral news.

come on.

And if you really believe it's neutral,

Everybody who assigns a story to a reporter

knows that reporter's biased.

It comes out in the news and what gets published and

what doesn't.

the news?

up.

But no one has really taken it on as a topic and

10
11

50

The editors have bias.

How many stories about mind control hit

Occasionally.

The economists might pick it

Somebody might pick up a little bit, a piece of it.

consistently pursued it.


Yet, when you think about modern technology and

12

the resolution -- now, we've been talking about things

13

that have happened in the past, and somebody even

14

mentioned this, MK-ULTRA is a program -- you've heard it

15

alluded to.

16

subprojects under it.

17

That was the CIA's program.

It had 144

Most of the records surrounding that were

18

shredded by a guy named Gottlieb, who was responsible

19

for that at the Central Intelligence Agency during the

20

Church Committee hearings.

21

truth back then.

22

this, has become increasingly refined as our technology

23

has advanced.

24
25

We never really got the

But the resolution, the ability to do

When you think about technological advances,


one of the things I read says that technology from the

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
103
311
103
103
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 104
312 of 183
336

51

invention of the wheel to where we are today, it doubles

about every nine to ten months.

Invention of the wheel to where we are today, ten months

from now we're going to double that, and then we're

going to keep doing that.

Wow.

Think about it.

It used to be every five years in the 1980s,

and it kept shrinking as our computing power increased

and our ability to manipulate large amounts of data

increased.

10

Now, a super computer, think about a super

11

computer.

12

was doing this work, about 280 teraflops a second, which

13

at that time would be like six billion people on the

14

planet with hand calculators doing a calculation every

15

60 seconds for 60 hours to do what that super computer

16

could do in a second.

17

A super computer will do somewhere, when I

Well, the next evolution -- some think it's

18

already here -- are the quantum computers.

19

the quantum computer do?

20

will do what a super computer does in a trillion years.

21

It's back to this analogy of how much EMF do we have out

22

there.

23

What will

A quantum computer in one hour

Well, think about the same kind of

24

amplification and computing power.

25

as a concept.

You look at privacy

It doesn't exist in the world today,

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
104
312
104
104
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 105
313 of 183
336

52

right?

tracked, whether it's your GPS on your phone, whether

it's your phone conversations -- in the United States,

every piece of mail is photographed for who it went to

and who sent it.

Virtually everything about us is catalogued,

When you think about your telecommunications,

your Internet connections, Google, AT&T, Verizon, all of

them have violated the very essence of what personal

privacy is all about.

10

Because today, in the 21st Century, we need a

11

revolution, an evolution of what privacy is all about.

12

Because you, experiencing the victimization of this

13

technology, are the pinnacle of the abuse.

14

is subject to abuse of personal privacy.

15

But everyone

You used to think about it, it would start and

16

end in our physical doorway in our home.

17

in your home compared to what is in data banks stored on

18

every single human being in this room.

19

It has nothing

Now, people say, oh, don't worry about it.

20

don't have the ability to collect.

21

resolution to look into it.

22

that resolution.

23

computing first will be able to hack through every

24

security code for every system on the planet within

25

hours.

We

We don't have the

Quantum computers will give

Whichever government finds quantum

They'll be able to predict with so much accuracy

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
105
313
105
105
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 106
314 of 183
336

53

by collecting all that data and analyzing that data, it

will almost seem a spiritual event.

But it will only be accurate up to a certain

point.

And over time that flaw will amplify to where it's big

flaws.

guide our world, to guide our ideas, our philosophy, and

how we pursue the world.

And then there will be a little bit of a flaw.

But we'll rely increasingly on these systems to

The Internet.

What people think about that is

10

the world wide mind of the 21st Century.

11

Public Broadcasting System, did a special called "The

12

World Wide Mind".

13

I say within 20 years or even now -- maybe it already

14

exists now -- but within 20 years that you'll be able to

15

connect the physical minds of all of the people on the

16

planet in a world wide mind.

17

PBS, our

And they say within 100 years -- and

Now, that might appeal to some.

It doesn't

18

really appeal to me from the standpoint of technology.

19

I think we already have that on a certain level.

20

think we already are connected on a certain level.

21

belief systems limit our ability to access that level,

22

but I believe it's here.

23

I
Our

And I've seen enough demonstrations of it.

You

24

know, all those scientists I had in that room for that

25

mind effects conference, the part that really blew me

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
106
314
106
106
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 107
315 of 183
336

54

away that I didn't expect was what they really centered

on was the idea -- and this was Rosalie Bertell, the nun

and physicist, and she said that the next leap is going

to be the leap where we realize or we recognize or we

remember our extrasensory perceptions, our anonymous

capabilities as human beings and that becomes the next

evolution of the human kind.

8
9

And what suppresses that is fear and anxiety,


because you cannot reach those cases of consciousness as

10

long as you're in fear and anxiety.

And anyone who

11

purports or is a victim of these technologies, do you

12

have anxiety, do you have fear?

13

you have the ability to reach those higher states of

14

consciousness in that condition?

15

not possible.

Of course you do.

Do

It's physiologically

16

So when you think about entire populations,

17

whether it's religion injecting fear or whether it's

18

government injecting fear or as my friend used to say,

19

you know, the king keeps you poor and the church keeps

20

you dumb, kind of was the early idea when you think

21

about how things evolved in Europe several hundred years

22

ago.

23

When you think about modern technology on the

24

backdrop of that concept, what's changed?

25

changed.

It's just the same deal.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
107
315
107
107
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Nothing's

You know, 6,000 wars

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 108
316 of 183
336

55

in 4,000 years, most of them over religion; let me give

you a clue, God doesn't need any help killing anybody.

God can probably do it himself or herself.

The fact of the matter is, the idea that people

would just be evil on -- and I think I heard earlier

today that the psychopaths are in the minority.

believe they are.

people, they're out there, but they're not this mass.

Most people do things because they believe they're

I think really evil-to-the-core

10

right, and then they want to impose their rightness on

11

other people.

12

And this is kind of a mistake and then we end

13

up in this conflict between ideas without being fair and

14

recognizing people's right to disagree.

15

said earlier, certain things you can't say in Germany.

16

Certain things you can't say in a movie theater, too.

17

You know, you can't yell fire.

18

sense.

19

And I heard it

Now, it makes good

You don't want to yell fire in a movie theater.


Some would say what we're doing here is yelling

20

fire in a movie theater because we're letting people

21

know what we know, what we've concluded from a good deal

22

of research.

23

You know, my books are written, every page at

24

the bottom of each page are the footnotes.

25

find that distracting.

Some of you

Personally, I want to know where

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
108
316
108
108
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 109
317 of 183
336

the information came from as I'm reading it, not a week

later as I'm contemplating it.

source.

56

I want to know the

And so in the publications that I've written,

1600 source documents, reviews out of a matrix of a

hundred thousand that we had available to us, more or

less.

have made it into four books on technology dealing with

mind effects, dealing with HAARP, dealing with personal

20,000 have made it into my archives and 1600

10

privacy issues.

11

the last four years.

12

A lot of the things go unreleased in

You can look at my publications from 1999 and

13

2000, and you'll see the same things, because the old

14

literature showed enough to come to those conclusions.

15

When I testified in the European Parliament in

16

the '90s, at their invitation -- and this was another --

17

a good side story for technology.

18

name of Thomas Spencer, he was from the UK, he was a

19

Parliamentarian at the time, and he was the Chairman of

20

the Environmental Subcommittee of the European

21

Parliament.

22

given him the book on HAARP and he was very interested

23

in this.

24

I flew to Brussels and spent a few days with him talking

25

about the issue and brought with me a couple feet of

A gentleman by the

And he had contacted me.

So we had a conversation.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
109
317
109
109
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Somebody had

And at my expense,

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 110
318 of 183
336

57

unclassified documents for his research team to take a

look at.

What happened then is he moved in the European

Parliament -- he was a Conservative, by the way, and he

moved into a Foreign Affairs Chairman, a very powerful

position, an ideal position for dealing with the things

that we were dealing with at the time.

8
9

So we -- at his invitation, I came over to


testify in front of the group on security and

10

disarmament in the European Parliament on HAARP and on

11

non-lethal weapons, the kinds of things we've been

12

talking about today, the manipulation of human beings.

13

Now, they do it a lot differently than we do it

14

in the US.

In the US, when you have public hearings,

15

the public actually gets to come.

16

Parliament, the public meeting is you have to have an

17

invitation to come.

18

know, I hadn't really thought much about that.

In the European

So that's kind of different.

You

19

And they also -- they can also do things behind

20

closed doors, which, you know, we theoretically can't do

21

in the United States.

22

the public invited or the media invited.

23

You can't have a meeting without

So what happened the night before the hearing

24

is the Committee met with myself, one of the other

25

people testifying, and a member of the press and we

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
110
318
110
110
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 111
319 of 183
336

58

spent five and a half hours in a non-official meeting to

talk about these issues, so that when we actually gave

our testimony the following day, they would have

formulated a set of questions to give us the opportunity

to follow along.

because then they at least had a good base of knowledge.

So it was a great way to do it,

Now, in that private meeting we demonstrated a

technology using infrasound where you could transfer

sound through electrodes attached to the skin where you

10

would perceive that proverbial voice in the head.

11

demonstrated that to the Parliamentarians in that closed

12

session.

13

We

And then we went into the hearing the following

14

day.

15

her, testifying on our side.

16

the gentleman's name, but he was from a group called

17

GRIP in Brussels that does research on weapon systems

18

particularly and he had done his Master's thesis on

19

HAARP, and so he was there.

20

And it was Rosalie Bertell, which is where I met


It was -- I can't remember

We had someone from the International Red Cross

21

that had done work on non-lethal weapons and was a

22

specialist in this particular area.

23

there.

24
25

And then I was

We each got 15 minutes to present.

And then I

got an hour of questions from the committee in the open

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
111
319
111
111
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 112
320 of 183
336

59

hearing where I had the opportunity to talk about some

of these things.

been this incident in Japan where children watching a

cartoon that had a certain flicker rate had caused over

700 children to go to the hospital with epileptic

seizures.

a problem, right?

to go into the hospital.

And right around that time there had

Now, remember, non-ionizing radiation is not


A flicker of the TV caused 700 kids

Now, some say that was by design.

Some say

10

that was by accident.

11

for talking about non-ionizing radiation in the European

12

Parliament because they had all read that story.

13

fresh.

14

But it was a perfect illustration

It was

The other thing demonstrating infrasound,

15

something that had never been demonstrated, to my

16

knowledge, in that type of a meeting, to show that you

17

could actually transfer sound without necessarily

18

involving the ears.

19

Now, there's another technology that was

20

advanced by a guy named Woody Norris -- he won the

21

Lemelson Prize at MIT for this particular technology,

22

and I believe the year was 2004.

23

Norris -- and his was using acoustic heterodyne where he

24

could send in two signals from two different sources,

25

point them at an individual in the crowd, and they would

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
112
320
112
112
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

You can look up Woody

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 113
321 of 183
336

60

hear this voice in their head and nobody else would hear

it.

Well, he won a half a million dollars for that

prize, organized a company called ATCO.

them up.

technology to the military for perimeter protection.

You know, where they could have these sort of alarm

systems so when the protestors got too close they'd hear

these warning signs that nobody else was hearing.

10

They're a public company.

You can look

And he sold that

Now, you think about that for a moment.

11

Imagine -- this is why the European Parliament got

12

interested, because we used this illustration.

13

imagine a national leader standing up in front of a

14

group and all of a sudden they hear voices in their head

15

that nobody else hears.

16

right?

17

what that technology can do.

18

demonstration.

19

Now,

That's the end of that guy,

I mean, he's out of there.

And that's exactly

And that was one

Now, some have said that you can pulse modulate

20

on a single beam and create the same effect or utilize

21

something like HAARP, not so much for voice in the head,

22

but for certainly changing emotional state of large

23

segments of the population.

24
25

When we looked at all of this, we even looked


back -- you know, where else could this have been used?

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
113
321
113
113
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 114
322 of 183
336

61

And there was a device in Vietnam called the Lida

machine, L-i-d-a.

named Ross Adey, who is, unfortunately, also deceased.

Ross Adey was brilliant and was utilized by the

government, by private sector as an expert in these

kinds of areas.

A guy who researched this was a guy

Well, he was asked to look at -- this

particular device had been captured during the Vietnam

War.

It was a Russian device.

And it created the

10

entrainment effect using flickering light and sound.

11

And they used it for interrogating prisoners by putting

12

them into that, like, trance-like state and then

13

extracting intelligence from them.

14

1960s.

15

Now, that's the

Again, this is low resolution, low technology.


As computing powers increased, as our knowledge

16

in human physiology has increased, as our knowledge of

17

the electromagnetic nature of human beings has

18

increased, the ability to manipulate large segments of

19

the population comes easily achieved, either as a side

20

effect or unfortunate disaster of our technology.

21

You mentioned Swiss Re, Swiss Re Insurance.

22

Swiss Re Insurance wrote a paper on Electrosmog.

23

believe it was 2002.

24

industry then, don't insure electromagnetic field

25

effects because it will result in a bigger lawsuit than

And they said to the insurance

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
114
322
114
114
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 115
323 of 183
336

62

Firestone on their tires or the smoking industry,

because the knowledge is here and now and nobody insures

that risk.

Lloyd's of London insures anything, but they

won't insure that risk.

Nobody does.

Because insurance

companies don't like to lose money.

that.

before cell phones were invented, the University of

Washington had investigated those very same frequencies

It's as simple as

And yet the telecom industry on cell phones --

10

on chick embryo studies and determined they were

11

harmful.

12

Cell phones didn't exist then.


Then cell phones come out and everything's safe

13

all of a sudden.

14

says, now, wait a minute, we did all this research.

15

This is a dangerous thing.

16

a powerful adversary.

17

That same guy that did that research

So it went to the Congress.

18

There was a guy in Florida.

19

controversy.

20

said, we need a study.

21

pay for the study.

22

study.

23

But the telecom industry is

You remember this.

Brain cancer.

It ended up in the Congress.

Big
Congress

So the industry says, oh, we'll

They spend 25 million dollars on the

I can't remember the guy's name who did it, but

24

he eventually published a book because his findings

25

were, hey, this is dangerous.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
115
323
115
115
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

All right.

He issues his

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 116
324 of 183
336

report.

they got the 25 million into his queue.

it all on these projects.

himself.

5
6

They figured, hey, they got him.

63

You know,
He got to spend

He got to make some money

Hey, he's our man.


Well, he wasn't.

This guy actually had some

integrity, and I apologize for not recalling his name.

A VOICE:

DR. BEGICH:

A VOICE:

10

George Carlo.
Which one is it?

George Carlo.

DR. BEGICH:

George Carlo, that's correct.

And

11

he wrote a book called, "Cell Phones", a very important

12

book.

13

And when it comes to children, one of his

14

observations was -- he had the simple observation of

15

damage to skulls.

16

five-year-old, 400 percent more energy transfers to the

17

skull into the brain than an adult.

18

twelve-year-old, approximately 200 percent.

19

You know, you have a four-year-old, a

Ten-year-old,

This is one of the main reasons why you don't

20

want children using cell phones or, even worse, the

21

portable phone in the home because it's even less

22

efficient with the battery and the energy with even more

23

leakage.

24

phone today where you actually pick it up and talk into

25

it.

And what do we do?

Try and find a hard line

You can't even find them anymore.

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
116
324
116
116
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

They're almost

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 117
325 of 183
336

64

impossible to find.

When you look at what we have learned about

human physiology and the effects of electromagnetic

fields on the human physiology, it is the revolution in

science that will collapse the pharmacuetical industry

one day.

recognize that the pea in the soup of electromagnetic

radiation has been the cause and the root to most of the

chronic disease we see on the planet today.

10

And one day we're going to wake up and

When you combine that with that concept that I

11

used, that example of iodine, everyone has a little bit,

12

now you have these complex interactions, 5,000 new

13

chemicals are introduced or compounds introduced to the

14

public every year without really any serious studies,

15

and then you add this on top of it, and now you have a

16

very toxic world.

17

manipulation from the propaganda of World War II to the

18

downloading of that.

19

achieve?

20

personnel with a download.

Blap.

21

years' worth of education.

Now, let's go on.

22

And then you take the technology of

What does the military hope to

They want to be able to train military

And now here's the thing.

23

kind of education.

24

programming.

25

thinking involved.

There's your 12

Think about that

No critical thinking involved.

It's like writing to a disk.


Who controls that?

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
117
325
117
117
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Just

No critical

Curriculum

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 118
326 of 183
336

controls the way in which our society goes.

risk.

65

This is the

What about evidence in courtrooms when you can

create a synthetic memory or wipe one out?

that do to a Democratic Republic or a Democracy where

people have the power?

us as we become increasingly transparent to governmental

agencies and they become increasingly opaque.

What does

That power has been taken from

It is the opposite of what should be occurring.

10

There shouldn't be a camera in every household.

11

should be a camera in every government office.

12

the technology's there.

13

and look at what our employees are doing, right?

14

Wouldn't you like to be able to dial up your

15

Congressional office and see that conversation they're

16

having in real time?

17

that?

18

There
Because

We should be able to dial in

And why shouldn't we be able to do

What do they have to hide?


You know, you think about government and you

19

start saying that and, you know, the only people

20

protected from that kind of intrusion in the US are

21

federal employees.

22

protection than the average citizen within the country

23

that I live in.

24
25

They have a higher level of

For what?

And when you think about government, everyone


points to the politician.

I can tell you, most

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
118
326
118
118
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 119
327 of 183
336

66

politicians are ignorant.

parties in the United States the preference is to have

people that are -- they look like the news announcer,

but they couldn't think their way out of a phone booth,

right?

they couldn't think their way out of one.

want people that are smart enough to look good, but not

smart enough to think on their own.

politician for political parties, because they can be

10

In fact, most political

We don't even have a phone booth anymore, but


Because they

That's the ideal

told what to do.

11

Look at how much money is being spent in

12

political outcomes.

13

have pointed and looked at, like, Australia to mandatory

14

voting.

15

Huge amounts of money.

Some people

Everybody votes now.


Worst possible thing that you could ever do.

16

And here's why:

17

pulls the lever?

18

maybe 20 percent of the population votes, but at least

19

they're informed.

20

When the population doesn't vote, who


Those that are informed, right?

So

They've educated themselves.

If you force people to vote to keep their

21

driver's license, their medical benefits, or whatever

22

social programs you've got running and you say, you will

23

vote, now who decides what they vote on?

24

buy the 30-second or one-minute ad on TV that influences

25

them.

Whoever can

The moment they walk into the booth, they go, ah,

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
119
327
119
119
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 120
328 of 183
336

and pull the lever.

A very dangerous situation.

Now we have a dangerous situation.

Democracy is something that each of us have to

claim internally.

for in this group happens by a change in consciousness,

by us recognizing what we are as human beings,

recognizing the potential that we have.

know what these government programs yielded?

points to the fear side of the equation.

The change that people are looking

Because you
Everybody

But what they

10

really discovered was that every single soul, every

11

human being has this anomalous capability.

12

Now, imagine if we could awaken those

13

capabilities, could you hide anything?

14

people could literally look into the mind of another

15

person, that makes a politician pretty vulnerable,

16

wouldn't it?

17

67

I mean, if

That is the next evolution that I believe is

18

happening and it's the only evolution, the only

19

revolution that can change the way things are.

20

starts with human consciousness.

21

believe to be right and true and beginning to act on it.

22

Not from a foundation of fear, but a foundation of

23

confidence.

24
25

It

It starts with what we

You know, somebody asked me once, what do you


think about faith?

I said, faith is what you know to be

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
120
328
120
120
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 121
329 of 183
336

68

right and true and you step into it on the idea that you

can achieve it.

You believe it.

So many people I've seen in this work, they

keep jumping into things beyond their belief.

don't believe they can achieve it.

and they fail, and they keep failing.

are doing good work otherwise step back, do what you can

do with confidence, do what you can do with knowledge,

don't wait for a group to form.

They try it anyway


And people who

The group's already

10

here.

It's called the human race.

11

to be right and true.

12

up, learn from it, and move forward.

13

They

Act on what you know

If you make a mistake, clean it

When you look across this room and you look at

14

all these folks with a little bit of gray hair, and

15

you've got the gray hair not by all of those great

16

things that happened in your life, but by the real

17

disasters that happened in your life.

18

think about bad news is a stimulation for good news.

19

You know, you

People ask me, you know your father's

20

disappearance, disappeared off the face of the earth,

21

that must have been a horrible thing.

22

the time.

23

life because it altered my course.

24
25

Yeah, it was at

I consider it the most important event in my

The worst things in our lives alter our course,


change our direction, activate that higher potential

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
121
329
121
121
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60


89 Filed 06/05/16
07/12/16 Page 122
330 of 183
336

69

that cause us to rise out of the ashes of our apathy and

our defeats and stand on our feet again and move

forward.

The pain that people experience today is the

catalyst for the solutions tomorrow, whether we like it

or not, whether it's falling down as a two-year-old or

standing up as an adult.

our ethics, on the basis of our values, and we

reinvigorate and let go of the fear and recognize what

If we stand up on the basis of

10

we are as creative beings, we have the potential to make

11

change.

12

And with that, I'll open it to questions.

13

(Applause.)

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Mind Control
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
ControlTranscripts
Transcript Amicus for Kathleen KanePage
Transcripts
Page
Page
Page
122
330
122
122
ofof
of
189
336
173
183
316
191

Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday, June
July
June12,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 331 of 336

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 20, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography


Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for
an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons,
most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a
victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005.
I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out
assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts
of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due
process; thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed
energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal
action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy.
The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with
the same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I
have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and
confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the
numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on
the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment,
threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants
or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of
justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S.
Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized
and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I
am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Stan J.
Mind
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Control
Control
Caterbone/Advanced
Transcripts
Transcript Amicus
Transcripts
Media
forGroup
Kathleen
Biography
KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
123
331
123
123
1 ofof
of
6
189
336
316
191

Wednesday,
Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday,April
June
July
June12,
20,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 332 of 336

In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster
Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim
Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will
provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and
assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured,
and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy
weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented
the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and
the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton
Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures.
I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning
and the performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in
it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District
Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference
of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal
and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South
Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was
solicited by ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of
RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also
proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster
Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under
construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to
People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and numerous others.

Stan J.
Mind
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Control
Control
Caterbone/Advanced
Transcripts
Transcript Amicus
Transcripts
Media
forGroup
Kathleen
Biography
KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
124
332
124
124
2 ofof
of
6
189
336
316
191

Wednesday,
Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday,April
June
July
June12,
20,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 333 of 336

In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those
creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the
AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company
wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that
lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects
of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K
symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator
William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities.
The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based
real time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees
some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human
resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and
negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since
it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County
demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans
it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an
increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.

Stan J.
Mind
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Control
Control
Caterbone/Advanced
Transcripts
Transcript Amicus
Transcripts
Media
forGroup
Kathleen
Biography
KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
125
333
125
125
3 ofof
of
6
189
336
316
191

Wednesday,
Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday,April
June
July
June12,
20,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 334 of 336

In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which
was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give
specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical,
and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State
Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled
to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with
scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services
and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology
(NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the
Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore
Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R,
Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a
major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for
the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had
arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly.
We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula
of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was
released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.

Stan J.
Mind
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Control
Control
Caterbone/Advanced
Transcripts
Transcript Amicus
Transcripts
Media
forGroup
Kathleen
Biography
KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
126
334
126
126
4 ofof
of
6
189
336
316
191

Wednesday,
Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday,April
June
July
June12,
20,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 335 of 336

I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both
debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements,
and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High
Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We
were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had
financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services,
tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one
year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the
other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4
million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments.
(See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team
scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the
camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for
teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa
Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues
most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino
was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players
Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp,
while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article
about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants,
with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a
professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video.
The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked
forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.

Stan J.
Mind
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Control
Control
Caterbone/Advanced
Transcripts
Transcript Amicus
Transcripts
Media
forGroup
Kathleen
Biography
KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
127
335
127
127
5 ofof
of
6
189
336
316
191

Wednesday,
Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday,April
June
July
June12,
20,
5,
6, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 89 Filed 07/12/16 Page 336 of 336

In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future
of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr.
Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors.
That concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

Stan J.
Mind
Mind
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Control
Control
Caterbone/Advanced
Transcripts
Transcript Amicus
Transcripts
Media
forGroup
Kathleen
Biography
KanePage
Page
Page
Page
Page
128
336
128
128
6 ofof
of
6
189
336
316
191

Wednesday,
Monday,
Sunday,
Tuesday
Sunday,April
June
July
June12,
20,
5,
6, 2016

También podría gustarte