Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Lindsey Miller
Campaign Director
Ashley Lafreniere
Media Planner
Lauren Gherardi
Creative Team
Kaylan Ward
Account Executive
Dionella Gallo
Media Planner
Justin Aledia
Creative Team
Ryan Begley
Research Director
Kevin Barry
Research Team
Minnda Fulmer
Creative Team
Dainelis Rodriguez
Secondary Research
Director/Copywriter
Kristina Aranilla
Research Team
Alex Brunette
Creative Team
About Premier
solutions
Mission Statement
Philosophy
Slogan
The Objective
E
x
e
c
u U
t M
i M
v A
e R
Y
The Premier Solutions team was asked to create an integrated 2017 holistic marketing campaign to
grow Snapple volume in the US. Our objective is to create strong consumer affinity for Snapple in the
Northeast, increase purchase frequency in heavy users, and increase brand awareness outside of the
Northeast to drive trial and ultimately grow Snapple volume. Our target audience are millennials between 24-36 year olds, with a bullseyes on 30 year old.
Our goals are to grow heavy user buying rate from 9x to 10x per year within the Heartland. Convert
high awareness to top of mind brand awareness. Grow light users buying rate from 1x to 3x per year.
The Challenge
Snapple has high brand awareness and are beloved in the Northeast, which it calls its Heartland.
Almost half of Snapples annual volume is from the Heartland alone.
The Challenge is increasing brand awareness in people outside of the Heartland. We also need to get
non-Heartland consumers to try Snapple to grow volume. We also have to get Snapples most loyal
consumers to purchase more Snapple. The non-heartland people are aware of Snapple, but only 15%
have Snapple as their top Tea or Juice drink consideration.
The RTD Tea and Juice category is very competitive and Snapple is in 4th place in volume performance. Competitors like Arizona and Lipton dominate the market category.
The Solution
Our research gave us insights on our target audience. When they think of Snapple, they think of
drinking this sweet drink when they were younger. Snapple is nostalgic for them. These people also
live busy lives and arent that health conscious.
Premier Solutions has created a campaign to using our insights to reach our target audience of millennials between the ages of 24-36. Our Target groups are Heavy Heartland users, Light Heartland
users, Light Non-heartland users, and Non-Heartland Non-users. Our plan is to boast brand awareness and trial by using nostalgic, quirky and comical advertising. This will include promotions at festivals, outdoor, internet, radio and television media.
Our strategy to boost brand awareness and grow Snapple volume will be executed by positioning
Snapple as the go-to beverage that takes you back to sweet moments in your life. We will engage
our target by using interactive social and digital media. The campaign will spark consumers memories
of sweet moments with Snapple. Our target audience grew up in the 90s, so we have incorporated
that into our campaign. They will be given an incentive to share their Snapple memories online with
the hashtag #MySnappleMemories.
INdustry analysis
Category Statistics
Snapple is a component of the Liquid Refreshment Beverage (LRB) category, particularly within the ready-to-drink (RTD) tea and
juice drinks segments
Sales: The LRB category generated
$1,079,200,000 in 2014
Volume: Increased to 2.2 % in 2014
Weaknesses
Minimal advertising
Declining sales in the past 3 years
May not be able to maintain 99 cent
price
Strengths
Weaknesses
Not a healthy option
Weak brand visibility
Strengths
No artificial flavorings
Owned by Pepsico and Unilever
Great brand visibility
ompetition
Strengths
Weaknesses
High price
Strengths
Weaknesses
Strengths
Weaknesses
High price
COMPANY
analysis
History
Marketing Strategy
Building and enhancing our leading
brands
Pursuing profitable channels, packages and categories
Leveraging our integrated business
models
Strengthening our route to market
Improving operating efficiency
Brand
ision
Accountable
Customer-centric
Transparent and honest
Inspect what we expect
Own our decisions
No blame fixing
Products
Selection:
14 different teas
15 different juice drinks
7 excluded to non-heartland
Popular flavors:
Peach Tea
Kiwi Strawberry Juice Drink
Snapple Apple Juice Drink
Diet Peach Tea
S. W. o. T.
Strengths
High brand
recognition
Branded
entertainment
partnerships
Strong brand
equities
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Low consideration
Outside of North
East
Discontinuing the
use of Wendy the
Snapple lady
Room for
re-branding
Tap into the
health trend
Increase social
media awareness
Competing brands
promoting healthier
beverages
Price competition
Snapple lawsuit in
2011
Opportunities
Tea and juice drink categories are expected to increase
sales volume due to the health trend
Increasing product innovation that meets the target markets
change in behavior
Increasing brand relevance through engagement tactics
and drive trial will help eliminate competition
Endorsing real-life people to drive up awareness and sales
problems
Target Audience
SUPPORT
CO
NS
ID
ER
AT
I
ON
T
INSIGH
TON
E
To convince:
Because: Snapple is a
Comical, light-hearted
and nostalgic
EG
T
A
TR
OBJEC
T
IVE
et ce
rg
Ta dien
Au
Creative Brief
Snapple provides an
all-natural ready to drink
option for people with
busy lives that want a
tasty pick-me-up.
To establish Snapple as a
go-to pick-me-up
beverage for the target
audience
Grow brand relevance
in the Heartland through
engagement
Non-Heartland goal is to
grow purchase frequency
from 1x to 3x per year
Heartland: Millennials between the ages of 2436 who already drink Snapple and live busy lives
rimary
I en
joy
for S Snapple
nap
-Ada ple.
m, 28
esearch
like a
t
s
o
m
l
a
Its
treat.
Jacob, 34
.
uality tly
q
c
i
g
c
ostal sted exa r
n
f
o
sort it has ta s say, fo
a
s
a
h
let
se
it lly becau t is has,
life.
y
a
a
i
h
m
c
t
f
e
Esp me way 7 year o
a
the s the last 1 Erika, 30
-
i
tw
ven as avai
prom ding m lable
i
Plus inently achine n my m
i
, ev
a
eryo on disp nd it w ddle sc
ho
ne
lay
as
it so
it ju was a at the alway ol
s
l
st k
ind ways ra local d
of
el
-Mic
v
hea happe ing abo i.
l, 28
ned
ut
.
ood
g
r
lly
rea es you
s
e
tast uench
t
i
itll q rst.
thi n, 26
and
ya
-Br
ca
ps
in the with fac
ts
m, fr
om th
e
90s.
-Mar
ie, 28
i
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
s
s
u
r
v
e
y
Jer
r
Hea y - 32
v
fro y use
m
r
lan hea
rtd
zoe
y
Ligh - 26
t
fro User
m
hea
rtl
and
rac
h
ligh el - 30
t
fro user
m
non
-h
lan eartd
sch
m
non idt 2
u
fro ser 8
m
non
lan heart
d
Target AUdience
Started drinking Snapple at a young age and has never stopped.
His fridge is always stocked with Snapple, and no grocery run is complete without a couple of
Snapple six packs.
Snapple is Jerrys go to drink anytime he needs a pick me up, or something refreshing.
He likes to stay fit, but isnt necessarily obsessed with health trends.
He usually listens to Spotify and Pandora on his way to and from work, as well as when hes
working out.
While he is a social media user, he usually sticks with Facebook and YouTube.
Started drinking Snapple when she was young, but started moving away from it as she became older.
Most likely to buy Snapple in a bodega, deli, or convenience store.
She picks Snapple when she is feeling nostalgic and is in the mood for a treat.
Overall, Zoey doesnt see Snapple as particularly relevant anymore.
Is just starting her career and takes it very seriously.
She most often stops for a Snapple on her way to work, or during her lunch break.
Heavy social media user, frequenting sited such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube,
and Pinterest.
Usually doesnt drink much of any ready-to-drink beverages, instead opting for making his
own tea at home.
Sees Snapple as a drink for young children.
Takes his health very seriously, spending a decent portion of his free time working out.
When he does purchase ready-to-drink beverages, he goes for the healthier options with
either zero calories, or very low calories.
More likely to support a product thats affiliated with a cause or a charity.
Just getting set in his career with plans of starting a family in the near future.
Heavy social media user, frequenting Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.
arketing
Objectives
mission is to expand Snapples brand relevance through engagement strategies and increase purchase frequency from 9x to 10x per
year. In the non-heartland, our mission is to
initiate product trial by converting our high user
awareness (90%) to top of the mind awareness
(15%) and increase purchase frequency from
1x to 3x per year.
The heartland consists of the North Eastern
part of the U.S. The non-heartland consists
of the West, Midwest, South West, and South
East.
Marketing Strategy: To position Snapple as a
sweet, all-natural beverage that reminds you of
the simpler moments in life.
Tagline: Making memories sweeter.
M
S
arketing
trategy
Media Plan/Schedule
Snapple Flowchart
Snapple
Flowchart
Premier Solutions
Medium
Net TV-Prime
- Empire
- The Big Bang Theory
- New Girl
$(000)
Net TV-Sports
- ESPN
$(000)
Spot Radio-Morning Drive
- Spotify
- Pandora
$(000)
Spot Radio-Evening Drive
- Spotify
- Pandora
$(000)
Outdoor
- Digital Billboards
- Bus Wrap
$(000)
Other Spot
- Promotional
- Internet Ads
$(000)
National Only Area
GRPS
$(000)
Reach
Avg. Freq.
Spot Only Area
GRPS
$(000)
Reach
Avg. Freq.
Spot + National
GRPS
$(000)
Reach
Avg. Freq.
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
3
1082.5
GRPS:
COST:
36
12990.2
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
GRPS:
COST:
12
120.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
GRPS:
COST:
12
3000.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
1
250.0
GRPS:
COST:
12
3000.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
1,308
18.0
GRPS:
COST:
15695
216.0
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
N/A
1491.7
GRPS:
COST:
0
17900.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
4
1092.5
4
1.0
GRPS:
Cost:
47
13110.2
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
1309
2009.7
87.9
14.9
GRPS:
Cost:
15719
24116
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
1313
3102.2
88.2
14.9
GRPS:
Cost:
15767
37226.2
MEDIA BUDGEt
Total $43,126,252
creative strategy
TV:
We targeted three specific shows that we know our target market is currently
viewing. Empire, The Big Bang Theory, and New Girl are not only viewed by our target
audience it also fits accordingly with our targets personality type. These shows generate 3.8 to 17.6 million views.
Promotional:
Internet Radio:
Outdoor Advertising:
C
Internet radio
r
e
a
t
i
v
e xecution
Internet Radio Ad
Pandora and Spotify
Sweeter Things in Life
Internet Ads
Television Commercial
Outdoor
ads
p
r
o
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
Evaluation
References
Alesci, Cristina. PepsiCos Pure Leaf brews growth for its tea business. CNN Money. 17. Apr. 2015. Web. 29 Jan. 2016.
Arizona Beverages- Americas No.1 Selling Iced Tea Brand. Arizona. n.d. Web. 30. Jan. 2016.
Bailey, Sharon. A guide to the non-alcoholic beverage industry. Market Realist. 20. Nov. 2014. Web. 29. Jan. 2016.
Be More Tea with Liptons new campaign. Unilever. n.d. Web. 29. Jan. 2016.
Bevnet. Coca-Colas Gold Peak Tea Becomes a Billion-Dollar Brand. Lexicon Branding. 10. Apr. 2015. Web. 27. Jan. 2016.).
Brisk Iced Tea enlists Darth Maul and Yoda for Star Wars promotion across U.S. and Canada. PepsiCo. 4. Jan. 2012. 30. Jan. 2016.
Brisk Iced Tea launches new campaign thats Not Half Bad. PepsiCo. 6. Mar. 2014. Web. 30. Jan. 2016.
Bouckley, Ben. Pulp fact not fiction: PespiCo files global paper bottle patent. Beverage Daily. 10. Mar. 2014. Web. 27. Jan. 2016.
Brbaklic, David. Brisk Iced Tea Hits $1 Billion In Sales. Branding Magazine. n.d. Web. 27. Jan. 2016.
Coca-Cola Company. PlantBottle: Frequently Asked Questions. Coca-Cola Company 1. Jan. 2012. Web. 28. Jan. 2016.
Crawford, Elizabeth. Increased innovation needed to further drive tea sales in the US. Food Navigator. 30. Sept. 2015. Web. 28. Jan. 2016.
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. SWOT Analysis. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. SWOT
Analysis (2015): 1-9. Business Source Complete. Web. 29 Jan. 2016.
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Vision. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. n.d. Web. 29. Jan.2016.
Dr Pepper Snapples marketing expenditure worldwide from 2008 to 2014 (in million U.S. dollars). Statista. n.d. Web. 29. Jan. 2016.
DyeDiet. Brisk adds three more chemicals to reduce calories. DyeDiet. 17. Mar. 2013. Web. 27. Jan. 2016.
Fry, Nicole. The Evolving Non-Alcoholic Beverage Landscape. First Bev. Mar. 2015. Web. 26. Jan. 2016.
Goggi, Peter, F.The Tea Association of U.S.A Inc. Tea Association of the USA Inc. 2014. Web. 29. Jan. 2016.
Jed, Emily. Study Finds Renewed Growth In Beverage Markets; Carbonated Soft Drinks Continue To Lose Share. Vending Times. 10. July.
2015. Web. 29. January. 2016.
Lipton Tea SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors. Mbaskool. n.d. Web. 30. Jan. 2016.
Lipton Tea. Lipton. n.d.Web. 30. Jan. 2016.
Moye, Jay.Gold Peak, Fuze Tea Join Cokes Roster of Billion-Dollar Brands. Coca-Cola Company 5. Feb. 2015. Web. 29. Jan. 2016.
Neff, Jack. Lipton Uses Oscars (and Muppets) to Launch Global Campaign for Unified Brand. Advertising Age 26. Feb. 2014. Web. 28. Jan.
2016.
Snapple History. Snapple. n.d. Web. 26. Feb. 2016.
Snapple Case Study. National AAF Student Advertising Competition. 2015. Doc. 31. Mar. 2016.
Statistics and facts on non-alcoholic beverages and soft drinks. Statista. 2014. Web. 26. Feb. 2016.
Rubenstein, Abigail. Snapple Beats All Natural Label Suit. Law 360. 24. Jan. 2011. Web. 27. Jan. 2016.