Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
lightning
stroke,
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Multi-Circuit Towers
The height of multi-circuit towers varies in the range of 5588 m. The tower structure also varies from tower to tower
along the 5.2-km route. The layout of a typical suspension
tower is shown in Fig. 1. The distances are given in meters.
The upper two cross-arms carry at left and right side a 220-kV
and 380-kV single-circuit line, respectively. A 110-kV
double-circuit line is suspended from the lowest cross-arms.
The tower is represented by loss-less Constant-Parameter
Distributed Line (CPDL) model [2]. The propagation velocity
of a traveling wave along a tower is taken to be equal to the
h
light velocity, [3], [8]. The tower traveling time is t = . h
c
is the tower height.
There are several formulas to calculate the surge
impedance of the tower [3], [8-10]. As a basis, the formula
given in [10] for waisted tower shape (Fig. 2) and
recommended by IEEE and CIGRE [8] is used:
R
Z t waist = 60 ln cot 0.5 tan 1
h
where R =
r1h2 + r2 h + r3 h1
and h = h1 + h2 .
h
(1)
h2
h1
Fig. 1. Layout of a typical multicircuit suspension tower
Fig. 4. Modelled part of the transmission line route with a junction at tower
#1 (GW: ground wire)
C. Transmission Lines
All overhead lines at the same tower are represented by the
CPDL model at f = 400 kHz. Ground wire is represented like
Ri =
xi
1
2 Z t ln
h
Li = 2 t Ri
50
current (kA)
40
ramp
30
CIGRE
20
10
0
time (s)
12
16
20
[u(t ) U ] dt F
(4)
1 s
u (t )dt = U ave > 400 ( kV ) D ( m ) + 50 ( kV )
Ts 0
vLAVE
(7)
qL = 2 K 0 xLAVE (C)
(8)
u (t ) E0 p D
(9)
vl = 170 D
E0 p exp ( 0.0015 u (t ) / D )
D ll
4000
(10)
2000
1000
0
u (t )
E0 for 0 xLAVE < D 4
K1 A
D 2 xLAVE (t )
=
(m/s) (6)
u (t )
5000
3000
(5)
2
3
4
time to breakdown (s)
reference [7]
reference [15]
ll = vl ( t ) dt
(11)
Kind
Pigini et al
Motoyama
18
230
16
14
225
12
220
10
215
210
205
200
2
0
1
10
11
12
towers
90
80
mean value
height (m)
90
80
lightning peak current (kA)
20
235
195
240
70
60
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
50
40
30
10
11
12
towers
20
10
0
1
10
11
12
towers
Kind
Pigini et al
Motoyama
mean value
p (i > I ) =
60
50
40
1
I
1+
31 kA
2.6
(12)
30
20
10
0
1
10
11
12
towers
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500
-1000
5
phase A cct.1
10
phase B cct.1
15
phase C cct.1
time (s)
phase A cct.2
20
25
phase B cct.2
30
phase C cct.2
Fig. 13. Discharge current of the six line surge arresters at tower #3
(no flashover at adjacent towers is assumed)
1.0
0.8
voltage (MV)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
T1 phase C
T2 phase C
10
T4 phase C
15
T5 phase C
20
time (s)
25
30
Fig. 14. Voltages between phase c and the tower at towers #1, #2, #4 and #5
of the 110-kV line due to discharging of line surge arresters at tower #3. No
flashover at adjacent towers is assumed.
0.4
0.2
voltage (MV)
Voltage (kV)
400
300
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
200
-1.2
3
T2: phase B
100
7
6 .
5
4
3
1 .10 1 .10
1 10 1 .10 1 .10
0.01
0.1
10
100
Current (kA)
Fig. 12.
The
simulations
of
lightning
strokes
with
I = 200 kA; 3 s / 77.5 s at the towers #3 and #8 confirmed
also that no breakdown can occur across parallel insulators
according to the other two flashover models by Pigini et al
and Motoyama. Due to discharging of the surge arresters (see
Fig. 13) the voltage of the 110-kV phase conductors
temporarily increases significantly. Fig. 14 shows voltages of
phase c at the towers #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5, when a lightning
stroke with I = 100 kA; 3 s / 77.5 s hits the top of the tower
#3. The operating 50-Hz voltage of phase c is at moment of
the lightning stroke equal to the negative peak value (90 kV).
Depending on the amplitude of the discharge current of surge
arresters, a flashover may take place at other towers, which
are not equipped with surge arresters. In this respect two cases
have been studied: lightning stroke to towers #3 and #8, which
are equipped with line surge arresters for 110 kV. Adjacent
towers do not contain any line surge arresters.
The CIGRE current waveform with 3/77.5 s as lightning
stroke is used by increasing the amplitude in 5 kA steps. The
flashover condition is checked by the Kind equal-area
criterion. At tower #3, when I > 95 kA and at tower #8, when
I > 90 kA, a flashover is expected at the adjacent towers
T4: phase B
6
T4: phase C
12
15
time (s)
Fig. 15. Waveforms of voltages across 110-kV phase insulators with flashovers at towers #2 and #4 (no line surge arresters are installed at those towers)
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
VI. REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
Yamada, T.; Mochizuki, A.; Sawada, J.; Zaima, E.; Kawamura, T.;
Ametani, A.; Ishii, M.; Kato, S.: Experimental Evaluation of a UHV
Tower Model for Lightning Surge Analysis, IEEE Trans. on Power
Delivery, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 393-402, Jan 1995.
Canadian/American EMTP User Group: ATP Rule Book, distributed by
the European EMTP-ATP Users Group Association, 2005.
Ametani, A.; Kawamura, T.: A Method of a Lightning Surge Analysis
Recommended in Japan Using EMTP, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery,
Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 867-875, April 2005.
Mozumi, T.; Baba, Y.; Ishii, M.; Nagaoka, N.; Ametani, A.: Numerical
Electromagnetic Field Analysis of Archorn Voltages During a BackFlashover on a 500-kV Twin-Circuit Line, IEEE Trans. on Power
Delivery, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 207-213, Jan. 2003.
Dommel, H. W.: EMTP Theory Book, Bonneville Power Administration,
conversion into electronic format by Can/Am EMTP User Group in
1995.
Schmitt, H.; Winter, W.: Simulation of Lightning Overvoltages in
Electrical Power Systems, Proceedings IPST 2001 (International
Conference on Power System Transients), Rio de Janerio, June 24-28,
2001.
IEEE Fast Front Transients Task Force, Modeling and Analysis of
System Transients Working Group: Modeling Guidelines for Fast Front
Transients, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 493506, Jan. 1996.
CIGRE WG 33-01: Guide to Procedures for Estimating the Lightning
Performance of Transmission Lines, Technical Brochure, October
1991.
IEEE Working Group on Lightning Performance of Transmission Lines:
A Simplified Method for Estimating Lightning Performance of
Transmission Lines, IEEE Trans. on Power App. & Systems, Vol. PAS104, No. 4, pp. 919-927, April 1985.
Chisholm, W. A.; Chow, Y. L.; Srivastava, K. D.: Travel Time of
Transmission Towers, IEEE Trans. on Power App. and Systems, Vol.
PAS-104, No. 10, S. 2922-2928, Oktober 1985.
IEEE Working Group on Estimating the Lightning Performance of
Transmission Lines: IEEE Working Group Report Estimating
Lightning Performance of Transmission Lines II Updates to Analytical
Models, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1254-1267,
July 1993.
Motoyama, H.: Experimental study and analysis of breakdown
characteristics of long air gaps with short tail lightning impulse, IEEE
Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 972-979, April 1996.
Pigini, A.; Rizzi, G.; Garbagnati, E.; Porrino, A.; Baldo, G.; Pesavento,
G.: Performance of large air gaps under lightning overvoltages:
Experimental study and analysis of accuracy of predetermination
methods, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 13791392, April 1989.
Fernandes, M.; Correia de Barros, M. T.; Ameida, M.E.: Statistical
Study of the Lightning Overvoltages at a Gas Insulated Station
VII. BIOGRAPHIES
Mustafa Kizilcay was born in Bursa, Turkey in
1955. He received the B.Sc. degree from Middle
East Technical University of Ankara in 1979,
Dipl.-Ing. degree and Ph.D. degree from University
of Hanover, Germany in 1985 and 1991. From
1991 until 1994, he was as System Analyst with
Lahmeyer International in Frankfurt, Germany.
1994-2004 he has been professor for Power
Systems at Osnabrueck University of Applied
Sciences, Germany. Since 2004 he is with the University of Siegen,
Germany, holding the chair for electrical power systems as full professor. Dr.
Kizilcay is winner of the literature prize of Power Engineering Society of
German Electro-engineers Association (ETG-VDE) in 1994. His research
fields are power system analysis, digital simulation of power system
transients and dynamics, insulation-coordination and protection. He is a
member of IEEE, CIGRE, VDE and VDI in Germany.
Claus Neumann studied electrical engineering at
the Technical University of Aachen. After
finishing with the Dipl.-Ing. degree in 1972 he was
engaged as a testing engineer in the high voltage
and insulating material laboratory of a switchgear
manufacturer. In 1979 he joined the department
for HV equipment of RWE in Essen, Germany.
Among others he worked on non-standardised
stresses of switchgear in the network, on testing
technique, monitoring and diagnostics and on maintenance strategies. In
1992 he became head of this department. In 1992 he also received his Dr.Ing. degree from the Technical University of Darmstadt. In 2001 he became
Honourable Professor at the Technical University of Darmstadt where he
gives a lecture in HV switchgear and substations. Since 2005 is in charge of
the Operational Asset Management at RWE Transportnetz
Strom,
Dortmund, Germany. His main fields of activity are fundamental design and
layout of HV apparatus and asset management including maintenance and
renovation strategy, monitoring and diagnostics, environmental impact of
SF6 technology etc.. He is among others a member of CIGRE Study Committee C4, Power System Performance, of CIGRE SC D1 Working Group 3,
Gas-insulated Systems.