Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
mmurphy@sheppardmullin.com
6 Facsimile:
8
9
10
11
12
13 PRESTIGE FLAG MFG. CO., INC.,
14
a California corporation,
15
Plaintiff,
v.
16
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Prestige Flag Mfg. Co., Inc. (Prestige) complains and allege as
THE PARTIES
1.
2.
8 having a principal place of business at 6620 Nordic Drive, P.O. Box 68, Cedar Falls,
9 Iowa 50613.
10
3.
24 States Design Patent No. D564,405 (the D405 Patent) arising under the patent
25 laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code.
26
27
28
-2SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
1
2
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action under 28 U.S.C.
3 1331 (federal question) and 28 U.S.C. 1338(a) (any Act of Congress relating to
4 patents).
5
6.
6 Defendant pursuant to due process and/or the California Long Arm Statute because
7 Defendant has committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in violation
8 of 35 U.S.C. 271(a), (b), and (c), and places infringing products into the stream
9 of commerce, with the knowledge or understanding that such products are sold in
10 the State of California, including in this judicial district. Defendants acts caused
11 and are causing injury to Prestige within this judicial district. Upon information and
12 belief, Defendant derives substantial revenue from the sale of infringing products
13 within this judicial district, expects its actions to have consequences within this
14 judicial district, and derives substantial revenue from interstate and international
15 commerce.
16
7.
17 because a substantial portion of the events giving rise to the claims for relief stated
18 in this Complaint arose in this judicial district. Specifically, Defendant has sold
19 infringing products in this district, and committed other acts complained of infra
20 within this district. In addition, venue is proper because Prestiges principal place of
21 business is in this district and Prestige suffered harm in this district.
22
23
24
BACKGROUND FACTS
8.
Plaintiff Prestige offers a line of golf products under the name Smarty 5
25 Reflector. The Smarty 5 Reflector screws into the top of a golf flag stick, and
26 contains five prisms that reflect laser light. Coupled with a range finder (a device
27 that sends laser light toward the Smarty 5 Reflector and receives laser light reflected
28
-3SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
1 back from the Smarty 5 Reflector), the Smarty 5 Reflector enables a golfer to
2 accurately determine the distance between the golfer and the golf flag stick.
3
9.
4 through a design patent issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
5 Prestiges design patent covers the ornamental features of the Smarty 5 Reflector,
6 such as its shape and the location and distribution of prisms throughout the device.
7 Prestige owns all right, title, and interest in the asserted design patent, the 405
8 Patent, titled Flagpole Reflector, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. The
9 design claimed in the 405 Patent is embodied in Prestiges Smarty 5 Reflector.
10
10.
11 golf course accessories. Its products are sold by over 250 distributors on six
12 continents, and it manufactures, stores, sells, and distributes many of its products in
13 the United States.
14
11.
15 United States its Laser Reflector product, which infringes the 405 Patent.
16 Defendant has not obtained permission from Prestige to use Prestiges design
17 claimed in the 405 Patent. Defendant had many options in developing its Laser
18 Reflector. Defendant chose to infringe Prestiges design patent by making, using,
19 selling or offering for sale, and/or importing its Laser Reflector product during the
20 term of Prestiges patent.
21
12.
22 Reflector and the Smarty 5 Reflector (and the design claimed in the 405 Patent) is
23 such as to deceive an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually
24 gives, including inducing the purchaser to purchase one supposing it to be the other.
25 Defendants Laser Reflector has an overall appearance that is substantially the same,
26 in view of the prior art and in the eyes of an ordinary observer, as the Smarty 5
27 Reflector (and the design claimed in the 405 Patent), as demonstrated by the side28 by-side comparison below.
-4SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
Figure 16
D405
Laser Reflector
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
13.
23 through 12, inclusive, of this Complaint, and incorporates them herein by reference
24 as though fully set forth.
25
14.
26 infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the D405 Patent by making,
27 using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the
28 United States the Laser Reflector identified in this Complaint, which Laser Reflector
-5SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
1 embodies the design covered by the D405 Patent. Defendant has and continues to
2 infringe the D405 Patent indirectly, under 35 U.S.C. 271(b) and (c), by inducing
3 others to infringe the D405 Patent, and by committing acts that constitute
4 contributory infringement of the D405 Patent.
5
15.
16.
8 and proximate result of Defendants infringement of the D405 Patent, and, as such,
9 Prestige is entitled to damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and/or 289.
10
17.
11 irreparable harm from Defendants infringement of the D405 Patent. Prestige has
12 no adequate remedy at law and is, under 35 U.S.C. 283, entitled to an injunction
13 against Defendants continuing infringement of the D405 Patent. Unless enjoined,
14 Defendant will continue its infringing conduct.
15
16
PRAYER
(a)
(b)
(c)
27 days after entry of any injunction in this case, a written statement, under oath,
28
-6SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
1 setting forth in detail the manner in which Defendant has complied with the
2 injunction;
3
(d)
(e)
(f)
12
(g)
13 law, and any other further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.
14
15
16
17
18
19 Dated: July 1, 2014
20
21
22
By
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7SMRH:426167200.1
COMPLAINT
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A - Page 8
Exhibit A - Page 9
Exhibit A - Page 10
Exhibit A - Page 11
Exhibit A - Page 12
Exhibit A - Page 13
Exhibit A - Page 14
Exhibit A - Page 15
Exhibit A - Page 16
Exhibit A - Page 17
Exhibit A - Page 18
-65HY
7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHQRUVXSSOHPHQWWKHILOLQJDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJVRURWKHUSDSHUVDVUHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSWDV
SURYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKH
SXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
San Diego
(b)&RXQW\RI5HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG3ODLQWLII
Black Hawk
u )HGHUDO4XHVWLRQ
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
u 86*RYHUQPHQW
'HIHQGDQW
u 'LYHUVLW\
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
DEF
u
&LWL]HQRI$QRWKHU6WDWH
u
u
,QFRUSRUDWHGand3ULQFLSDO3ODFH
RI%XVLQHVV,Q$QRWKHU6WDWH
u
u
&LWL]HQRU6XEMHFWRID
)RUHLJQ&RXQWU\
u
u
)RUHLJQ1DWLRQ
u
u
TORTS
u
u
u
u
,QVXUDQFH
0DULQH
0LOOHU$FW
1HJRWLDEOH,QVWUXPHQW
5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW
(QIRUFHPHQWRI-XGJPHQW
0HGLFDUH$FW
5HFRYHU\RI'HIDXOWHG
6WXGHQW/RDQV
([FOXGHV9HWHUDQV
5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW
RI9HWHUDQV%HQHILWV
6WRFNKROGHUV6XLWV
2WKHU&RQWUDFW
&RQWUDFW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
)UDQFKLVH
u
u
u
u
u
u
REAL PROPERTY
/DQG&RQGHPQDWLRQ
)RUHFORVXUH
5HQW/HDVH (MHFWPHQW
7RUWVWR/DQG
7RUW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
$OO2WKHU5HDO3URSHUW\
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
PERSONAL INJURY
u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
u +HDOWK&DUH
3KDUPDFHXWLFDO
3HUVRQDO,QMXU\
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
u $VEHVWRV3HUVRQDO
,QMXU\3URGXFW
/LDELOLW\
PERSONAL PROPERTY
u 2WKHU)UDXG
u 7UXWKLQ/HQGLQJ
u 2WKHU3HUVRQDO
3URSHUW\'DPDJH
u 3URSHUW\'DPDJH
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
u $OLHQ'HWDLQHH
u 0RWLRQVWR9DFDWH
6HQWHQFH
u *HQHUDO
u 'HDWK3HQDOW\
Other:
u 0DQGDPXV 2WKHU
u &LYLO5LJKWV
u 3ULVRQ&RQGLWLRQ
u &LYLO'HWDLQHH
&RQGLWLRQVRI
&RQILQHPHQW
u 'UXJ5HODWHG6HL]XUH
RI3URSHUW\86&
u 2WKHU
BANKRUPTCY
u $SSHDO86&
u :LWKGUDZDO
86&
PROPERTY RIGHTS
u &RS\ULJKWV
u 3DWHQW
u 7UDGHPDUN
u
u
u
u
u
u
LABOR
)DLU/DERU6WDQGDUGV
$FW
/DERU0DQDJHPHQW
5HODWLRQV
5DLOZD\/DERU$FW
)DPLO\DQG0HGLFDO
/HDYH$FW
2WKHU/DERU/LWLJDWLRQ
(PSOR\HH5HWLUHPHQW
,QFRPH6HFXULW\$FW
u
u
u
u
u
SOCIAL SECURITY
+,$II
%ODFN/XQJ
',:&',::J
66,'7LWOH;9,
56,J
OTHER STATUTES
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
)DOVH&ODLPV$FW
6WDWH5HDSSRUWLRQPHQW
$QWLWUXVW
%DQNVDQG%DQNLQJ
&RPPHUFH
'HSRUWDWLRQ
5DFNHWHHU,QIOXHQFHGDQG
&RUUXSW2UJDQL]DWLRQV
&RQVXPHU&UHGLW
&DEOH6DW79
6HFXULWLHV&RPPRGLWLHV
([FKDQJH
2WKHU6WDWXWRU\$FWLRQV
$JULFXOWXUDO$FWV
(QYLURQPHQWDO0DWWHUV
)UHHGRPRI,QIRUPDWLRQ
$FW
$UELWUDWLRQ
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH3URFHGXUH
$FW5HYLHZRU$SSHDORI
$JHQF\'HFLVLRQ
&RQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RI
6WDWH6WDWXWHV
IMMIGRATION
u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQ
u 2WKHU,PPLJUDWLRQ
$FWLRQV
u 5HPRYHGIURP
6WDWH&RXUW
u
5HPDQGHGIURP
$SSHOODWH&RXUW
u 5HLQVWDWHGRU
5HRSHQHG
u 7UDQVIHUUHGIURP
$QRWKHU'LVWULFW
u 0XOWLGLVWULFW
/LWLJDWLRQ
(specify)
Patent infringement
u &+(&.,)7+,6,6$CLASS ACTION
VII. REQUESTED IN
81'(558/()5&Y3
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY
-8'*(
'$7(
&+(&.<(6RQO\LIGHPDQGHGLQFRPSODLQW
u <HV
u 1R
JURY DEMAND:
DEMAND $
'2&.(7180%(5
6,*1$785(2)$77251(<2)5(&25'
07/01/2014
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
5(&(,37
$02817
$33/<,1*,)3
-8'*(
0$*-8'*(