Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1.Thematerialfromthepresentationshouldbeincludedatthe
beginningofthereportinanumberofrelevantsections,butitwillnot
bemarkedinthisassessment.Itshouldbeincludedsothatitcanbe
referredtointheremainingsectionsofthereport.
2.QualitativeRiskAssessment.Doneasa group.UseQualitativeRisk
Criteriathatyouhavepreviouslyidentified.
a.PerformaHAZOPstudyonyoursystem,withtheresultsintable
format.Thetableshouldincludethefollowing:
i.Decompositionofsystemintosubsystems
SubTotal(Basic+
Threshold)
Definition
ii.Deviations(GuidewordandParameter)
iii.Causes
iv.Consequences
v.LikelihoodofConsequences(Qualitative)
vi.SeverityofConsequences(Qualitative)
vii.RawRisk(Qualitative)
viii.ExistingSafeguards
ix.LikelihoodofConsequences(Qualitative)Withexisting
safeguardsinplace
x.SeverityofConsequences(Qualitative)Withexisting
safeguardsinplace
1
1
xii.Explanation/Justification/Comments
xiii.Actiontofollowuptoreducetheriskfurther,beyondwhat
theexistingsafeguardsprovide.
b.ConsiderrelevantOPERATIONALMODES(e.g.SteadyState
operation,Startup,Shutdown,maintenance,etc)
1
1
SubTotalofPart2
15
Mark(02)
Decompositionislogicalandjustified.
Addressesallguideword/parametercombinations
statedintheHAZOPreferencesyouareusing.
Doesnotidentifyirrelevantcauses
Doesnotidentifyirrelevantconsequences
Doesnotspecifyalikelihoodlevelforthedeviation
thatisimpossibleinpractice
Doesnotspecifyaconsequencelevelforthedeviation
thatisimpossibleinpractice
Doesnotspecifyarisklevelforthedeviationthatis
impossibleinpractice
DoesnotmisssafeguardsthatappearontheP&ID
Doesnotspecifyalikelihoodlevelforthedeviation
thatisimpossibleinpractice
Doesnotspecifyaconsequencelevelforthedeviation
thatisimpossibleinpractice
Doesnotspecifyarisklevelforthedeviationthatis
impossibleinpractice
Explanations/justificationsareclearlywrittenwhere
themeaningisunderstood.
Actionsarenotimpossibleorcompletelyimpractical
toperform.
AddresssatleastMaintenance,StartupandShut
downinsomeform.
Doesnotmisshazards/riskeventsthatarenotALARP,
asdefinedbythepreviouslyspecificqualitativerisk
criteria.
xi.ResidualRisk(Qualitative)Withexistingsafeguardsinplace
CriticalThinkingMultiplier
(CTM)(14)
Assessedfromoverallimpactofeach
section(Qualitative,Quantitative,
Conclusions)
Mark(14)
ThresholdMarks(CONCEPT:thisisadiscretemark.Thedefinitionsare
writtensoyouwillgetthemarkoryouwon't)
BasicMark(CONCEPT:
haveyouaddressedthe
itemandansweredthe
questionATALL)
Mark(01)
30
45
FINALMARKforthat
section=(Basic+
Threshold)*(Totalof
CTM)
MaximumMarks
1.Communication
4
2.Analysis
4
3.ProblemSolving
4
4.Evaluation
4
5.Synthesis
TOTALCTM
20
900
900
3.QuantitativeRiskAssessment.Done individually.Usethe
quantitativeriskcriteriathatyouhavepreviouslyidentified.Each
individual person inthegroupshouldquantitativelymodelthe
consequencesandlikelihoodofone(1)riskevent,wherethatevent
involvessomekindof release ofmaterial(toxicand/orflammable)
and/orpressureortemperatureeffectsoutsideofthevesselor
pipingconfines.Itmustbeasufficientlysubstantialscenarioto
model.Ifyouhavequestionaboutthis,pleaseasktheUC.Theresults
ofeachperson'sanalysisshouldbeincludedinthereport.Each
personshouldfocusonmodellingariskeventthathadahigh
qualitativerisklevelfromtheHAZOPstudyandqualitativerisk
assessment.Thetasksinvolve:
a.Quantitativelymodelallthemajorconsequencesoftheevent.
Examplesincludegasdispersion,liquidformingapool,combustion,
explosions,fires,etc.Thepurposeofthisistoestimatethe extent
oftheconsequencesoftheparticularreleaseevent.Youwillneed
toresearchwhatmodelsareappropriateforthespecific
consequencesthatyouchoose.Providereferencesandevaluate
thevalidityofthosereferencesforsupportingyourmodelling
efforts.
Includesrelease/sourcemodelling,
dispersion/spreadingmodellingand,ifnecessary
(dependingontheriskeventselected),flammability
andexplosionmodelling.
1.Communication
Correctlogicalgatesareusedinthefaulttree/event
tree/bowtieforthegivenscenario.
b.Developabowtiediagram,consistingofafaulttreeconnected
toaneventtree,ofthecausesleadinguptothereleaseeventand
allthemmajorconsequencesstemmingfromthereleaseevent.By
researchingappropriatefrequencyand/orprobabilitymeasuresof
thecausesandconsequences,estimatethefrequencyofoccurrence
oftheconsequencesthatyoumodelledinparta.Donotinclude
thebarriers(existingsafeguards)atthisstage.
c.Basedontheresultsofpartaandb,estimatethe rawrisk
(withoutanysafeguards)ofyourchosenreleaseeventonyour
vulnerablereceptors thatyouhavepreviouslyidentified.Clearly
statewhatmeasureofriskyouareusing(e.g.LSIR,etc)andusethis
tocalculatetheriskvalue.
d.Comparetherawriskvaluetothequantitativeriskacceptability
andtolerabilitycriteriapreviouslyidentified.Istherawrisk
acceptable,tolerableorunacceptable?IsitALARP?
e.Identifytheexistingsafeguardsinyoursystemthataffectthe
specificreleaseeventyouaremodelling.Addthosepreventative
and/ormitigativebarriersintoyourbowtieandrecalculatethe
frequencyofthemajorconsequencesoccurring.
Referstoidentityandpotentiallocationsof
vulnerablereceptorsthatarepossibleinreality.
Identifiesandusesavalidmeasureofrisk.Doesnot
usepracticallyimpossibledataforsupporting
calculation.
Comparesrawriskvaluesandmakesajudgement
abouttheacceptability/tolerabilityoftheriskforthe
vulnerablereceptors.Showsanattempttodiscuss
whethertheriskisALARP.
Doesnotaddpracticallyimpossiblebarrierstobow
tie.Showsanattempttorecalculatethefrequency.
Referstoidentityandpotentiallocationsof
vulnerablereceptorsthatarepossibleinreality.
Calculatestheresidualriskwiththesamecalculation
aspartc.Doesnotmissoutanyofthebarriers
identifiedinparte.Doesnotusepractically
impossibledataforsupportingcalculation.
g.Comparetheresidualriskvaluetothequantitativerisk
acceptabilityandtolerabilitycriteriapreviouslyidentified.Isthe
rawriskacceptable,tolerableorunacceptable?IsitALARP?Discuss
theeffectoftheresidualriskvalueonthevulnerablereceptors.
Comparesrawriskvaluesandmakesajudgement
abouttheacceptability/tolerabilityoftheriskforthe
vulnerablereceptors.Offersajustifiedperspective
(supportedbyreasoningand/orreferences)on
whethertheresidualrisklevelisALARPforthe
vulnerablereceptors.
SubTotalofPart3
4.References.Includeacorrectlyreferencesreferencelist,according
toChicagostyle.
5.Appendices.Ifyouwishtoincludeextrainformation,please
includethisinanappendix.Yourmaincalculationsshouldbeinthe
reportbody.
6.MeetingMinutes:MeetingMinuteinteractiononGroupMap.
videnceofmeetingsatallandofcontributionsforallmembers.This
willbereviewedbytheUC.Therelativeinteractionbetween
participantsonGroupMapMeetingMinutesmaybeusedtomodify
finalindividualmarksinconsultationwiththepeerassessmentresults.
ThisisattheUC'sdiscretion.UChassetupameetingminutes
templateinGroupMapforeachgroup.Pleasegoto
https://curtin.groupmap.com/andusetheGroupMapIDemailedto
yourgroupfromtheUCviablackboard.Youcanjustusethe
"Brainstorm"featureoftheMap,oryoucanvoteonpostsorflag
certainpostsforaction.Explore!Youcancreateyourownmapsfor
yourgroupifyouwantto,butyoumustatleastusethemapcreated
foryousothereisanofficialrecordofyourgroup'sinteractionsand
discussions.
8.SpellingandGrammar [200marks]
2.Analysis
3.ProblemSolving
4.Evaluation
5.Synthesis
14
21
20
SUBTOTAL
CRITICALTHINKNINGPerformanceElement
Exemplary(4)
1.Communication
Identifythepotentialproblemsinyoursystem
2.Analysis
Compare&contrasttheavailablesolutions
3.ProblemSolving
Identify&defendpotentialsolutions
4.Evaluation
Identifystrengths&weaknessesthepotentialsolutions
5.Synthesis
Determineafinalsolutionbasedontheevaluationofthepotentialsolutions.
Suggestwaystodampenthedisadvantagesandpromotetheadvantagesofthe
chosensolution.
Overalltotal
Proficient(3)
TOTAL
(/100)
Developing(2)
Emerging(1)
Identifies themainidea
orproblemwithfew
detailsorexamplesina
somewhatorganized
manner.
Identifies themainideaor
problempoorlywith fewor
nodetails orstatesthemain
ideaorproblemverbatim
fromthetext.
Usessuperficial
reasoningtomake
inferencesregarding
solutions;showssome
confusionregarding
facts,opinionsand
relevantevidence,data
orinformation.
Makesunexplained,
unsupportedor
unreasonable inferences
regardingsolutions;makes
multipleerrors in
distinguishingfactfrom
fictionorinselecting
relevantevidence.
Throughlyidentifiesandaddresses Identifiesandaddresseskeyaspectsoftheproblemandusesfactsand
keyaspectsoftheproblemand
relevantevidencefromanalysistodeveloppotentiallyvalidsolutions.
insightfullyusesfactsandrelevant
evidencefromanalysistoidentify
anddefendpotentiallyvalid
solutions.
Identifiesandaddresses
someaspectsofthe
problem;develops
possiblesolutionsusing
someinnappropriate
opinionsandirrelevant
informationfrom
analysis.
Identifiesandaddressesonly
oneaspectoftheproblem
butdevelopsanuntestable
hypothesis;ordevelops
invalidconclusionsor
solutionsbasedonopinion
orirrelevantinformation.
Insightfully interpretsdataor
information;identifies obviousas
wellashidden assumptions,
establishes credibility ofsourceson
pointsotherthanauthorityalone,
avoidsfallaciesinreasoning;
distinguishes appropriate
argumentsfromextraneous
elements;provides sufficient
logicalsupport.
Makessomeerrorsin
dataorinformation
interpretation;makes
argumentsusingweak
evidence;provides
superficial supportfor
conclusionsofsolutions.
Interpretsdataor
informationincorrectly;
supportsconclusionsor
solutionswithoutevidence
orlogic;usesdata,
informationorevidence
skewed byinvalid
assumptions;uses poor
sourcesofinformation;uses
fallacious arguments
Inaccuratelyor
incompletely relates
conceptsandideasfrom
multiplesources;
shallow determination
ofeffectofnew
informationonchosen
solution.
Poorlyintegrates
informationfrommorethan
onesourcetosupport
chosensolution; incorrectly
predictstheeffectofnew
informationonchosen
solution.
10
Accuratelyinterpretsdataorinformation;identifies obvious
assumptions,establishes credibility ofsourcesonpointsotherthan
authorityalone,avoidsfallaciesinreasoning;distinguishesappropriate
argumentsfromextraneouselements;provides sufficient logicalsupport.
Insightfully relatesconceptsand
Accuratelyrelatesconceptsandideasfrommultiplesources;uses new
ideasfrommultiplesources;uses informationtoenhancechosensolution; correctlyidentifies potential
newinformationtoenhancechosen effectsofnewinformation.
solution;recognizesmissing
information;correctlyidentifies
potential effectsofnew
information.
20
15
420
420
200
200
200
200
3400
3400
100
ExplanationofRubric:
1.Yougetthebasicandthresholdmarksforeach
taskifyoufulfillthecritieria,describedabove.
2.Foreachofthemainparts(2,3,4)above,once
thebasicandthresholdmarkshavebeenapplied,
thepartismarkedagainusingthecriticalthinking
(CTrubric,showntotheleft<.Thetotalmarkfrom
theCTrubricisthenmultipliedbythesumofthe
basicandthresholdmarksasascalingfactor.Thisis
toencouragestudentstoapplydeeplevelsof
criticalthinkingtothetasksthataresetthem.
3.Thefinalmarkismadeupofthescaledmarksfor
eachpart(2,3,4)plusthemarksforreferencing
andspellingandgrammer.Thiswillgiveapotential
maximummarkof5680.Theactualmarkyou
receiveforthisassessmentwillbeoutof100.
Therefore,thesumofyourmarksabovewillbe
dividedby5680togiveyouamarkoutof100.