Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Introduction
During the lateral jaw movement, tooth contacts can
occur between opposing teeth on the working and
non-working sides. Although the role of the lateral
occlusal pattern has been considered to be not significant in development of dysfunctional signs and
symptoms of the masticatory system (15), it is
responsible for the distribution of force results from
unfavourable parafunctional activities such as grinding
or clenching (6).
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
714
715
716
N . O K A N O et al.
electrodes with an interelectrode distance of 15 mm.
In all subjects, electrode placement was chosen by
palpation of the muscles prior to the session. Skin
impedance was reduced with an alcohol scrub, and the
electrodes were placed parallel to the main direction of
muscle fibres. A ground electrode was attached to the
right ear-lobe.
Clenching level
Fig. 1. Schematic drawings of the overlays. (a) Sagittal view of
the working side canine overlay. Note that this overlay does not
exclude the contact between maxillary and mandibular canines.
(b) Frontal view of the working side premolar and molar overlays,
which contact buccal cusp of corresponding maxillary tooth.
(c) Frontal view of the balancing side second molar overlay, which
contacts the lingual cusp of corresponding maxillary tooth.
Experimental procedure
For each task, the subjects were initially instructed to
keep their mouths closed with their teeth in contact
and their jaw muscles relaxed for 3 s. They were then
asked to perform designated clenching efforts in the
canine edge-to-edge lateral occlusal position with the
overlays in place. Each clenching lasted for 5 s after a
signal was given. For each task, clenching was repeated
four times. Three minute resting periods were imposed
between each clenching with a 5-min rest interval
between tasks.
Fig. 2. The combination of overlays in four occlusal patterns.
Data analysis
Electromyography measurements
Electromyography activities in the anterior temporalis
and the masseter were recorded bilaterally using
bipolar silver surface electrodes with a fixed interelectrode distance of 15 mm. The EMG activities in the
posterior temporalis were also recorded using needle
Results
Fig. 5. Comparison of the x-axis components (anteriorposterior) of bilateral condylar displacement among
the four patterns. Positive value indicates anterior direction. Tukeys
multiple comparison test (n 20).
***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01.
2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32; 714719
717
718
N . O K A N O et al.
Discussion
The results from the present experiment let us reject
null hypothesis that the condylar displacements
would not be influenced by the change in the lateral
occlusal pattern. Specifically, the increased working
side tooth contacts reduced the displacement of the
working side condyle, and the non-working side
contact further reduced those of the non-working side
condyle under the clenching level controlled condition. These findings are consistent with some previous
studies, which reported that clenching induced mandibular elevation at the non-working side molar, this
was the largest when canine protected occlusion was
simulated during controlled sub-maximum clenching
and that the introduction of the non-working side
contact reduced the amplitude of the ipsilateral molar
elevation. All these suggested less non-working side
joint loading (17, 18). Furthermore, the expected less
joint loading on the non-working side associated with
ipsilateral molar contacts supports a clinical finding by
Minagi, et al. (10), who discovered a significant
positive correlation between the absence of nonworking side contacts and an increasing prevalence
11.
12.
13.
14.
References
1. Ingervall B, Mohlin B, Thilander B. Prevalence of symptoms
of functional disturbances of the masticatory system in
Swedish men. J Oral Rehabil. 1980;7:185197.
2. De Boever JA, Adriaens PA. Occlusal relationship in patients
with pain-dysfunction symptoms in the temporomandibular
joints. J Oral Rehabil. 1983;10:17.
3. Droukas B, Lindee C, Carlsson GE. Occlusion and mandibular
dysfunction: a clinical study of patients referred for functional
disturbances of the masticatory system. J Prosthet Dent.
1985;53:402406.
4. De Laat A, van Steenberghe D, Lesaffre E. Occlusal
relationships and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
Part II: Correlations between occlusal and articular parameters and symptoms of TMJ dysfunction by means of
stepwise logistic regression. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:116
121.
5. Agerberg G, Sandstrom R. Frequency of occlusal interferences: a clinical study in teenagers and young adults.
J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:212217.
6. Ramfjord SP. Dysfunctional temporomandibular joint and
muscle pain. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11:353374.
7. Belser UC, Hannam AG. The influence of altered working-side
occlusal guidance on masticatory muscles and related jaw
movement. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:406413.
8. Baba K, Ai M, Mizutani H, Enosawa S. Influence of experimental occlusal discrepancy on masticatory muscle activity
during clenching. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:5560.
9. Okano N, Baba K, Akishige S, Ohyama T. The influence of
altered occlusal guidance on condylar displacement. J Oral
Rehabil. 2002;29:10911098.
10. Minagi S, Watanabe H, Sato T, Tsuru H. Relationship between
balancing-side occlusal contact patterns and temporomandibular joint sounds in humans: proposition of the concept of
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
balancing-side
protection.
J
Craniomandib
Disord.
1990;4:251256.
Clarke NG, Townsend GC, Carey SE. Bruxing patterns in man
during sleep. J Oral Rehabil. 1984;11:123127.
Wilkie JK. Preliminary observations on pressor sensory
thresholds of anterior teeth. J Dent Res. 1964;43:962.
Loewenstein WR, Rathkamp R. A study of the pressoreceptive
sensibility of the teeth. J Dent Res. 1955;43:287294.
Rugh JD, Graham GS, Smith JC, Ohrbach RK. Effects of
canine versus molar occlusal splint guidance on nocturnal
bruxism and craniomandibular symptomatology. J Craniomandib Disord. 1989;3:203210.
Tokiwa H, Miura F, Kuwahara Y, Wakimoto Y, Tsuruta M.
Development of a new analyzing system for stomatognathic
functions. J Jpn Soc Stomatognasth Funct. 1996;3:1124.
Yatabe M, Zwijnenburg A, Megens CC, Naeije M. The
kinematic center: a reference for condylar movements. J Dent
Res. 1995;74:16441648.
Baba K, Akishige S, Yaka T, Ai M. Influence of alteration of
occlusal relationship on activity of jaw closing muscles and
mandibular movement during submaximal clenching. J Oral
Rehabil. 2000;27:793801.
Baba K, Yugami K, Yaka T, Ai M. Impact of balancing-side
tooth contact on clenching induced mandibular displacements
in humans. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:721727.
MacDonald JW, Hannam AG. Relationship between occlusal
contacts and jaw-closing muscle activity during tooth clenching: Part I. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:718728.
MacDonald JW, Hannam AG. Relationship between occlusal
contacts and jaw-closing muscle activity during tooth clenching: Part II. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:862867.
Wood WW, Tobias DL. EMG response to alteration of tooth
contacts on occlusal splints during maximal clenching.
J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:394396.
Kato T, Thie NM, Huynh N, Miyawaki S, Lavigne GJ. Topical
review: sleep bruxism and the role of peripheral sensory
influences. J Orofac Pain. 2003;17:191213.
719