El nacimiento de la tragedia
Consideraciones inactuales
I.
II.
III.
Strauss
Beneficios y prejuicios de la ciencia histrica para la vida
Schopenhauer educador
La filosofa en la poca
Humano, demasiado humano
Aurora
La gaya ciencia
As habl Zaratustra
Ms all del bien y del mal
Genealoga de la moral
Fragmentos pstumos
I.
II.
III.
IV.
1884
1884-1885
1887-1888
1889
El anticristo
Ecce Homo
Ditirambos dionisacos
The philosophy of History becomes the desire for Eternity
Nietzsche as Philosopher of our age and of Eternity
It appears that Nietzsche has a triple thesis that were in all of his work. The thesis are: The
untimely, the timely and the supra-timely. So, where is the progress here? The end of
History in Hegels philosophy comes with the problem of the evolution and progress, what
is the problem of history that becomes Nature science? Another question could be what is
the problem with history and the relation with mythology, philosophy and science? So that
lead us to: whats the meaning of history?
Between Hegel and Nietzsche there will be the problem of decay and reborn of civilization.
Specially with Nietzsche because, with him the problem turn to the Eternity, as Lwith
interprets Nietzsche. The new thing with Nietzsche is the petition of Eternity (as a
combination with a-historic and supra-historic. For Nietzsche that is the problem of the
will to match (or power). The dimension eternally of the being, that the problem with the
will to match.