Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER-LUBRICATED
BEARINGS MATERIALS ON A PIN-ON-DISK TEST RIG
Yuriy Solomonov
April 2014
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Friction is the most fundamental phenomenon accompanying the sliding motion of solid
bodies. Friction, vibration, and wear under conditions of contaminated water lubrication
are extremely important in many engineering applications such as water-lubricated
bearings, water pumps, and braking systems.
The aim of this project is to investigate the factors that could lead to an improvement in the
performance of water-lubricated bearings materials.
Previous studies have revealed the main factors contributing to power loss are frictioninduced vibrations, and wear in water-lubricated bearings. Those factors are the result of
contamination of the lubricant (sea water); bearing alignment (parallelism of the shaft and
shell); material characteristics; and condition of the contact (sliding) surfaces. The contact
mechanics of the water-lubricated bearings as well as the performance characteristics of
the bearings components on which friction is exerted also have a substantial influence on
the tribological characteristics of water-lubricated bearings materials.
Thus, the focus of the present study is on the effect of water contamination on the friction
coefficient, vibration, wear and the vibrationwear relationship under varying operational
conditions.
An experimental program was conducted to develop new methods and investigate the
effect of water contamination on the tribological characteristics of pairs of materials under
different operational conditions for water-lubricated bearings.
A Pin-on-Disk test rig was designed and built to adopt the operational environment of a
real water-lubricated bearing. This test rig was used to obtain experimental data regarding
the effect of water contamination on the long-term behaviour of the bearing systems, and
to investigate the friction, vibration, wear, and vibration-wear characteristics of the
materials. The effect of various parameters, such as the friction conditions, damping, and
operational environment on the behaviour of the bearing materials was also investigated.
ii
Abstract
The experiments demonstrated that all three factors, namely contamination, material
properties and surface conditions, have a significant influence on the tribological
characteristics of water-lubricated bearings. It was also demonstrated that when the
operation of the water-lubricated bearing takes place in boundary and mixed regimes, the
adhesive and abrasive mechanisms of friction are significant and contribute to the
generation of excessive wear and vibration. This is contrary to what is claimed by many
manufacturers. It was observed that the wear mechanism in the water-lubricated bearing
materials was associated with low-frequency vibrations and severe contamination of the
lubricant. Also, as expected, the vibrationwear relationship of the water-lubricated
bearing materials was significantly affected by the contamination of the lubricant and can
be changed by magnetic field damping.
The present study identified the primary mechanism responsible for the high friction
coefficient, vibration, and wear to be a three-body mechanism caused by the abrasive
nature of the water contaminant. It was found that there was a significant increase in the
friction coefficient, vibration, and specific wear rate at the slowest sliding speed of 0.393
m/s. This is due to the boundary regime of lubrication, the adhesive-abrasive wear
mechanism, and specific material properties of NF22 (Railko) material. It was also
explored and reported that for a specific applied load of 8 N, at low and high sliding
speeds, and water contamination levels, damping has a strong effect on the vibrationwear
relationship which is also dependent on sliding speed and, as a result, on the lubrication
regime.
Analysis of the existing types of materials, and experimental models and techniques
for modelling and simulating the operational conditions of water-lubricated
bearings
Abstract
iv
Declaration
DECLARATION
I, Yuriy Solomonov, certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted
for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution
and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or
written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text.
I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being
made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act
1968.
I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web,
via the Universitys digital research repository, the Library catalogue and also through web
search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for
a period of time.
Yuriy Solomonov
Acknowledgements
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following work presented in this thesis would have not been possible without the help
and invaluable support of my family, university staff, and my friends and colleagues from
ASC.
I am truly thankful to my Principal Supervisor, Mr Ian Brown, for his support, assistance
and effort in the planning, experimentation and guidance throughout this entire project. Mr
Brown, despite a heavy workload and looming deadlines, was most helpful and would
never hesitate to take the time to answer questions and responsively sort through various
ideas and problems.
Tatiana, my wife, has been extremely supportive in many ways and deserves a special
mention. Thank you for being patient with me when it counted most and encouraging me
to complete my thesis, especially during the most difficult period of my candidature.
The effort of my co-supervisor A/Prof. Reza Ghomashchi, throughout the final stage of my
project is also greatly appreciated.
The support of many people within the School of Mechanical Engineering, including
academic staff, mechanical and electronic workshop staff, postgraduate students, and
technical and administrative support staff, is also acknowledged.
I would also like to thank my friends and colleagues from ASC who have contributed in
one way or another throughout my candidature.
vi
Table of contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... II
DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ V
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. VI
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ VII
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... XI
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... XV
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1
Table of contents
Table of contents
MATERIALS ........................................................................................ 69
VALIDATION STUDY........................................................................ 80
CHARACTERISTICS....................................................................................................... 85
7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 85
7.2 Experimental study of the effect of contamination on friction: experimental plan and
procedure ............................................................................................................................. 85
7.3 Experimental study of the effect of contamination on friction: results and discussions 87
7.3.1 Investigation of friction under water lubrication ................................................ 87
7.3.2 Investigation of the friction coefficient and the effect of contamination ........... 92
7.4 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 96
CHAPTER 8
Table of contents
CHAPTER 9
List of figures
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Diagram showing a simple tribological system ................................................... 1
Figure 1.2 Diagram showing the complicity and complexity of tribological processes
(Materials Tribology laboratory, 2008) ................................................................................. 2
Figure 1.3 An example of an aft bearing system (Solomonov et al., 2010) .......................... 4
Figure 2.1 Friction experiments suggested by Leonardo da Vinci. (Krim, 2002) ............... 10
Figure 2.2 The original Stribeck curves obtained by Martens in 1888 (Martens, 18881889) .................................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 2.3 Elastic deformation of crystal lattices during dry sliding (Holinski, 2001) ....... 15
Figure 2.4 Tribological changes during initial sliding of two solid bodies (Holinski, 2001)
............................................................................................................................................. 16
Figure 2.5 Hydrodynamic lubrication .................................................................................. 18
Figure 2.6 The three lubrication regimes in the Stribeck curve ....................................... 19
Figure 2.7 Lubrication regimes in water-lubricated bearings, reproduced from Kotousov
(2009), p. 7, Figure 2.2.1 ..................................................................................................... 22
Figure 2.8 Boundary and hydrodynamic regimes of lubrication, reproduced from Kotousov
(2009), p. 7, Figure 2.2.2 ..................................................................................................... 23
Figure 2.9 Typical baseline frictionspeed curve (Pan et al., 1971) ................................... 28
Figure 2.10 Analytical two-degree model representing a submarine aft water-lubricated
bearing, as displayed in Simpson and Ibrahim (1996), p. 90, Figure 2 ............................... 30
Figure 3.1 Experimental wear rates for water-lubricated bearing materials (Biswell, 2007,
Cumberlidge, 2009, WRTSIL, 6/09/2007) .................................................................... 40
Figure 3.2 Scaled test rig and major components, as displayed in Kotousov (2009), p. 13,
Figure 3.2.1 .......................................................................................................................... 41
Figure 3.3 Friction curves vs. sliding speed, m/s (rotation speed, rpm), reproduced from
Kotousov (2009, p.18) ......................................................................................................... 43
Table of figures
Figure 4.4 Load cell with one additional weight block (applied force 17.5 N) ................... 54
Figure 4.5 Bending arm with attached strain gauges ........................................................... 57
Figure 4.6 Calibration data friction force versus voltage output for bending arm 1 ........... 58
Figure 4.7 Load cell with pin and displacement sensor ....................................................... 59
Figure 4.8 Calibration data friction force vs. voltage output for load cell .......................... 59
Figure 4.9 Schematic diagram of the data acquisition system used for the measurements of
pin displacement and arm forces on the POD test rig.......................................................... 60
Figure 4.10 Schematic diagram of the water supply system used on the POD test rig ....... 61
Figure 4.11 Design sketch of the test rig identifying the major components ...................... 62
Figure 4.12 Fully-equipped Pin-on-Disk test rig ................................................................. 63
Figure 5.1 Typical baseline of viscosity of water vs. temperature T, 0C, reproduced from
Ginzburg et al. (2006, p.696), Figure 2 ............................................................................... 71
Figure 5.2 Water-lubricated bearing damage (subjected to long-lasting operation which
resulted in significant wastage and associated ovalisation of the bush), where Do=initial
dimension, Dp=actual dimension and Dw=wear due to water contamination as displayed in
Litwin (2009, p.44, Figure 6 and p.48, Figure 21) .............................................................. 72
Figure 5.3 PTFE test sample used during the validation study ........................................... 74
Figure 5.4 NF22 (Railko) sample used in the experimental study ...................................... 77
Figure 5.5 AISI 440C stainless steel test disk fitted on the POD test rig ............................ 78
Figure 6.1 Coefficient of friction of the PTFE pin against a stainless steel disk for a sliding
speed of 0.32 m/s ................................................................................................................. 82
Figure 7.1 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel versus
normal applied load under dry conditions ........................................................................... 88
Figure 7.2 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel versus
sliding speed under dry conditions ...................................................................................... 89
Figure 7.3 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel versus
normal load under clean water-lubricated conditions .......................................................... 90
Figure 7.4 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel versus
sliding speed under clean water-lubricated conditions ........................................................ 91
Figure 7.5 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 1%
contaminated water lubrication ............................................................................................ 93
xii
Table of figures
Figure 7.6 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 2%
contaminated water lubrication ............................................................................................ 93
Figure 7.7 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 4%
contaminated water lubrication ............................................................................................ 94
Figure 7.8 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 6%
contaminated water lubrication ............................................................................................ 94
Figure 7.9 Coefficient of friction vs. water contamination of NF22 (Railko) material
(sliding speed=0.393 m/s) .................................................................................................... 95
Figure 8.1 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values under
1% water contamination .................................................................................................... 102
Figure 8.2 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values under
2% water contamination .................................................................................................... 102
Figure 8.3 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values under
4% water contamination .................................................................................................... 103
Figure 8.4 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values under
6% water contamination .................................................................................................... 103
Figure 8.5 Mass loss versus degree of water contamination for NF22 (Railko) material at a
sliding speed of 0.393 m/s ................................................................................................. 104
Figure 8.6 Micrograph of pins worn surface before/after a full cycle of experiments, at a
magnification of X500 ....................................................................................................... 105
Figure 8.7 Micrograph of pins worn surface after a full cycle of experiments, at a
magnification of X100 ....................................................................................................... 106
Figure 8.8 Micrograph of pins worn surface after a full cycle of experiments ................ 107
Figure 8.9 Micrograph of stainless steel disks worn surface after a full cycle of
experiments, at a magnification of X100 ........................................................................... 107
Figure 8.10 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 1% water contamination ................................................................................. 109
Figure 8.11 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 2% water contamination ................................................................................. 109
Figure 8.12 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 4% water contamination ................................................................................. 110
Figure 8.13 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 6% water contamination ................................................................................. 110
xiii
Table of figures
Figure 8.14 Specific wear rate versus degree of water contamination of NF22 (Railko)
material for a sliding speed of 0.393 m/s ........................................................................... 111
Figure 9.1 POD test rig equipped with a magnet ............................................................... 116
Figure 9.2 Calculated friction force (N) versus time for undamped and damped conditions
under load 8 N and sliding speed 0.393 m/s ...................................................................... 121
Figure 9.3 Calculated friction force (N) versus time for undamped and damped conditions
under load 8 N and sliding speed 1.557 m/s ...................................................................... 124
Figure 9.4 Welch power spectral densities for damped and undamped conditions under
load 8 N and 0.393 m/s, sliding speed ............................................................................... 128
Figure 9.5 Welch power spectral densities for undamped and damped conditions under
load 8 N and 1.557 m/s, sliding speed ............................................................................... 131
Figure 9.6 Calculated RMS values for NF22 (Railko) material at normal and damped load
(8 N) ................................................................................................................................... 134
Figure 9.7 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material for undamped and damped
conditions ........................................................................................................................... 137
Figure 9.8 Microscopy of the pins worn surface before and after a full cycle of
experiments at a high sliding speed of 1.557 m/s, at a magnification of X30 ................... 139
xiv
List of tables
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Basic parameters for the Wrtsil wear tests (Biswell, 2007) ............................. 39
Table 3.2 Basic parameters of the bearing system (Kotousov, 2009, Solomonov et al.,
2010) .................................................................................................................................... 42
Table 4.1 Design requirements for the Pin-on-Disk test rig ................................................ 51
Table 4.2 Design requirements for the bending arms used on the POD test rig .................. 55
Table 4.3 Technical characteristics of bending arms ........................................................... 57
Table 6.1 Technical parameters adopted for the validation study ....................................... 81
Table 9.1 Technical parameters adopted for the vibrationwear experiments .................. 117
Table 9.2 Calculated RMS acceleration values at different sliding speeds, lubrication, and
contamination conditions, under an 8 N load .................................................................... 133
Table 9.3 Average mass loss (g) at different sliding speeds, lubrication, and contamination
conditions, under an 8 N load ............................................................................................ 136
xv
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
Since prehistoric times, human activities have involved friction. It is due to friction that we
are able to stand, run, start a fire, or even swim. Yet while friction is useful and necessary
for many human activities, it can also create many technological problems.
Friction takes place in all mechanical applications. These can include bearings, braking
systems and transmissions that involve two interacting surfaces, resulting in energy loss
and wear. Mankind has therefore made every possible effort to defeat the negative effects
of friction during the whole of human history.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
Figure 1.2 Diagram showing the complicity and complexity of tribological processes
(Materials Tribology laboratory, 2008)
The problem of friction, vibration and wear in rotating machinery is significant in many
engineering applications, particularly in water-lubricated bearings where it is undesirable
to experience friction and vibration between moving parts (Hori, 2006). Therefore,
increasing interest has been expressed in rotor dynamics, particularly the stability problems
encountered in high speed rotating machinery supported by water-lubricated bearings.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
the viscous forces in the lubricant and any water contamination (UoS, 2008, Kotousov,
2009, Maru et al., 2005, Ibrahim, 1994a, Maru et al., 2007b, Meuter, 2006, Hori, 2006,
Nikolakopoulos and Papadopoulos, 2008). Viscosity cannot be completely eliminated,
however, because the separation of the surfaces is dependent upon it; as the viscosity
decreases so does the separation until the surfaces come into contact (UoS, 2008). When
the rotational speed of the shaft in water-lubricated bearing decreases, contact begins to
occur as a continuous film of fluid is being broken. At this stage, the situation is a mixture
of hydrodynamic and boundary lubrication, which is called, mixed lubrication. If the shaft
rotation is decreased further, the film of lubricant is reduced to localised patches which are
only a few molecules thick. This type of lubrication is known as boundary lubrication. In
boundary lubrication, the friction coefficient does not depend on the viscosity of the
lubricant but rather on its material properties (UoS, 2008).
A good boundary lubricant is one that will attach itself firmly to the clean surfaces formed
as the cold-welded junctions are sheared. A layer is then formed that acts as a lubricating
film. If that layer can be easily sheared, then the friction is low. Typically, when the
coefficient of friction is of the order of 0.1, the wear is insignificant (UoS, 2008).
Water-lubricated bearings are one of the most important and promising directions for
further development in the ship-building industry. Propeller shafts of ships and submarines
are supported in stern-tube bearings. These bearings are water-lubricated, but the rotational
speed of the shaft may not be high enough to achieve a hydrodynamic regime. In this case,
unlubricated frictional mechanisms would prevail at the region of the surface area in direct
contact. The overall friction torque would be considerably higher than in the hydrodynamic
regime (full separation of the sliding surfaces) (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996). Therefore,
contact mechanics and friction phenomena in water-lubricated bearings are of interest to
contemporary researchers and engineers, especially in the field of tribology. During the last
two decades, many theoretical analyses and experimental studies have been undertaken to
investigate the operational characteristics and to identify the best materials for waterlubricated bearings (Harrison, 2008).
For marine engineering applications, two types of aft bearing systems exist. One is a waterlubricated bearing system that is mainly applied to small vessels. This is because of the low
allowable bearing pressure (Yamajo and Kikkawa, 2004). The other type of aft bearing
system is an oil-lubricated system for large vessel applications (Read and Flack, 1987).
3
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
This is because, at low speeds, oil-lubricated bearings provide better boundary lubrication
and therefore can withstand higher loads compared to water-lubricated bearings.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
Aft shafts used in submarines, boats, and ships are supported by water-lubricated bearings
that are lubricated and cooled by sea water. One of the problems associated with this is that
during start-up and shutdown, the rotation speed of the shaft may not be high enough to
achieve full separation of the surfaces by water. In this case, unlubricated frictional
mechanisms prevail at that portion of the surface area in direct contact. In addition, the
overall friction torque is considerably higher than the normal running value (Simpson and
Ibrahim, 1996).
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
With the growing interest in ship and submarine construction technologies in South
Australia, further experimental investigation and theoretical development of nonlinear
models that emulate the tribology of water-lubricated bearings and their materials are of
great interest to researchers and designers in marine engineering.
The significance of this research project is to extend the previous work of Kotousov (2009)
and to develop new methods for experimental investigations (Solomonov et al., 2010) of
tribological characteristics of water-lubricated bearings materials using a Pin-on Disk test
rig. The goal is to achieve a better understanding and modelling of tribological processes in
marine water-lubricated bearings. This enhanced understanding could lead to further
development of new materials and design solutions with a focus on efficiency and
noiselessness.
Identification of the existing problems in the contemporary technology of waterlubricated bearing materials and systems
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
Chapter 3 is the review of the results from a prior theoretical analysis and experimental
studies on the effect of water contamination on a water-lubricated bearing system which
were undertaken by other researchers in the School of Mechanical Engineering, University
of Adelaide and at Wrtsil Pty Ltd, a UK-based supplier of water-lubricated bearing
materials. These previous studies became a starting point for the experimental
investigations undertaken herein.
Chapter 4 deals with the experimental Pin-on Disk test rig which is used for the
experimental study of friction, vibration and wear. The main elements of the test rig and
data acquisition system and applied methods are discussed.
Chapter 5 presents a review of contemporary polymer-based materials that are used for
water-lubricated bearings and then describes the process used in the selection of the
available materials for further experimental investigation.
Chapter 6 includes the results of a validation study program to verify the capability of the
newly-designed and fabricated test rig. It also includes a discussion on the results obtained
from the experimental program which was conducted to examine the effect of varying
levels of contaminated water lubrication on the friction coefficient of materials for waterlubricated bearings.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
Chapter 7 discusses the experimental results which were obtained to analyse the effect of
contaminated water lubrication regimes on the mass loss and the specific wear rate of
materials used for water-lubricated bearings. This study investigated the sliding response
of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel.
vibrationwear
relationship
for
water-lubricated
bearings.
The
contacting
Chapter 9 presents the conclusions and recommendations for future work on theoretical
and experimental investigation of friction phenomena in water-lubricated bearing systems.
The results from this experimental investigation are also discussed and summarised.
Appendix A presents assembly drawings detailing the experimental Pin-on-Disk test rig.
CHAPTER 2
Dry friction resists the motion of two solid bodies in contact. Dry friction can be
divided into two types: static and dynamic friction (also known as kinetic or sliding
friction).
Internal friction: is when the resisting force exists due to movement between the
components of a solid body while it is being deformed.
Fluid or Lubricated friction: is when two sliding solid bodies are separated by
lubricant.
Several famous researchers have contributed to the understanding of friction in the past,
such as Guillaume Amontons, Leonardo da Vinci, Lohn Theophilus desaguliers, Leonard
Euler, and Charles-Augustin de Coulomb (Engineering-ABC.com, Courtel and Tichvinsky,
1964).
Leonardo Da Vinci (1452-1519) was one of the first scientists to investigate friction
(Courtel and Tichvinsky, 1964, Krim, 2002). He focused on many types of friction. He
found differences between rolling and sliding friction. Figure 2.1 presents sketches from
(Krim, 2002) showing Da Vinci experiments to investigate: a) the force of friction
between horizontal and inclined planes; b) the influence of the apparent contact area upon
the force of friction; c) the force of friction on a horizontal plane by means of a pulley and
d) the friction torque on a roller and half bearing (Krim, 2002).
Da Vinci was the first to proclaim two laws of friction. He claimed that the frictional
resistance was the same for two different objects of the same weight but making contacts
over different widths and lengths. He also found that the force needed to overcome
friction is doubled when the weight is doubled (Krim, 2002).
Da Vinci stated these two original laws of friction 200 years before Sir Isaac Newton (He,
2010, Zhuravlev, 2010). Da Vinci made the observation that different materials move with
different degrees of ease. He concluded that this was a result of the roughness of the
material; smoother materials will have smaller frictions (Krim, 2002). Da Vinci did not
publish his theories, so he never received recognition for his ideas. The only evidence of
their existence is in his voluminous journals.
Guillaume Amontons (1663-1705) rediscovered the two original laws of friction that had
been discovered by Da Vinci. Amontons concluded that friction was predominately a
result of the work done to lift one surface over the roughness of the other, or from the
deforming or the wearing of the other surface (Werktuigbouw&Tribologie, 2010,
10
Zhuravlev, 2010). For several centuries after Amontons' work, scientists believed that
friction was due to the roughness of the surfaces (Werktuigbouw&Tribologie, 2010).
Leonard Euler (1707-1783), a famous mathematician, was also much concerned with
friction problems. With the use of classical dynamics, he expressed the value of the
coefficient of friction by parameters which could be easily measured. Two of his famous
works were published under the auspices of the Royal Berlin Academy, one called
Friction of Solid Bodies and the other called Decrease of Friction Resistance. He
pointed out that the friction force is always tangential to the sliding velocity, and he
indicated the conditions of constant-acceleration motion with friction for plane and
inclined surfaces (Courtel and Tichvinsky, 1964).
Charles Augustin de Coulomb (1736-1806) added to the second law of friction (Liang,
2005, Zhuravlev, 2010). He proclaimed that strength due to friction is proportional to
compressive force although for large bodies friction does not exactly follow this law
and, as a consequence, the friction force and the area of contact are not dependable (Liang,
2005, Zhuravlev, 2010). Coulomb published his study, and referred it to Amontons
previous work. The second law of friction is known as the "Amontons-Coulomb Law"
referring to work done by the two scientists in 1699 and 1785, respectively (Werktuigbouw
& Tribologie, 2010, Zhuravlev, 2010). The Amontons-Coulomb law of friction has been
true for many combinations of materials and their geometries but, unlike Newtons first
law, nothing fundamental can be derived from it (Werktuigbouw & Tribologie, 2010).
Philip Bowden and David Tabor (1950) provided a physical explanation for the laws of
friction (Werktuigbouw&Tribologie, 2010, Courtel and Tichvinsky, 1964). They found
that the area of actual contact is a very small percentage of the total area of contact. The
actual area of contact is formed by the asperities and depends on the applied load
(Werktuigbouw&Tribologie, 2010). As the load increases, more asperities contact occur
and the actual area of each asperitys contact increases (Kaarstad, 2009).
11
Overall, the above findings were formulated into three friction laws (Zhuravlev, 2010):
1.
The friction force is directly proportional to the applied load. (the First Law of
Amontons)
2.
The friction force is independent of the total contact area. (the Second Law of
Amontons)
3.
Further research on the relationship between friction and lubrication was undertaken and
published in the late 1870s by Dr Robert H. Thurston at the Stevens Institute of
Technology (USA) (Thurston, 1879, Thurston, 1894), and in 1885 by Professor Adolf
Martens (1850-1914). The research was later finalised by Professor Richard Stribeck
(1861-1950) at the Royal Prussian Technical Testing Institute in Germany (Stribeck,
1902a).
Based on the results obtained in the form of so-called Stribeck curves by Professor
Stribeck in the early 1920s, the friction regimes for sliding lubricated bodies were
identified as static friction, boundary friction, mixed friction and hydrodynamic friction.
The Stribeck curve is a tribological characteristic which is utilised to characterise the
dependence of friction force on sliding speed between two liquid lubricated bodies
(Harrison, 2008, Hersey., 1934).
12
Figure 2.2 The original Stribeck curves obtained by Martens in 1888 (Martens,
1888-1889)
The science of friction and lubrication was named tribology and introduced in 1966.
Further study of tribology became possible with the invention of the atomic force
microscope (AFM) in 1986 and was concentrated on the micro-scale mechanics of contact
established asperities with adhesion and deformation. This approach enables researchers to
investigate friction on the atomic scale (Palaci, 2007). Thus, researchers are able to
determine how the mechanisms of friction change at macroscopic scale under different
operational conditions.
Micro- and nano-tribology have been introduced in recent years (Palaci, 2007). Frictional
interactions in microscopically small components are crucial to the development of new
products in contemporary technology such as electronics, sciences, chemistry, and
microelectronics.
13
Dry friction between two solid bodies in mechanical contact is caused by the dry friction
force of two components: the kinetic and static friction forces. These forces develop in a
perpendicular direction to the contact plane and oppose the relative motion of the contact
surfaces. A dry sliding friction between two surfaces can be modelled as elastic and plastic
deformation forces of microscopic asperities in contact (Olsson et al., 1997).
Consequently, it is possible to manipulate friction characteristics by employing surface
films of suitable materials between the bodies in contact. These surface films can also be
the result of contamination or oxidation of the bulk material or material displacement
(Nouira, 2008).
Holinski (2001) made a statement as to why dry friction occurs in composite materials.
According to his work, the reason for friction is lattice vibration. Lattice vibration occurs
during the sliding of solid surfaces when atoms of one surface make the atoms of the other
surface vibrate. Part of the mechanical energy which is required to move both surfaces
over each other is transformed into sound waves and heat (Holinski, 2001). The
tribological interactions of a solid surfaces exposed face with interfacing materials and
environment may result in a loss of material from the surface.
According to Holinski (2001), on the atomic scale, the crystal lattices of both solid
materials in contact are in a state of equilibrium. When a shear stress is applied to one
component, both lattices deform elastically. If the shear is further increased and instability
is reached, the atoms move to a new position of equilibrium. The crystal lattice vibrates
14
until all strain energy has been dissipated as seen in Figure 2.3, and all elastic energy has
been converted to heat.
Figure 2.3 Elastic deformation of crystal lattices during dry sliding (Holinski, 2001)
Holinski (2001) stated It has been found that during the initial sliding of the surfaces of
two solid bodies over each other, friction force is increased, as is frictional temperature. In
this phase, no material transfer from one surface to the other occurs. Only at the frictional
maximum are particles transferred, as shown in Figure 2.4 (Holinski, 2001).
15
Figure 2.4 Tribological changes during initial sliding of two solid bodies (Holinski,
2001)
When the transfer is initiated, the friction force decreases until a level of stability is
achieved. A transfer film depends on material properties and grows to a certain thickness.
For example, in a graphite-based composite, a homogeneous layer is not formed. However,
small graphite islands are built. The friction force decreases after formation of islands. It
has been found that during the sliding of solid bodies of different composite materials
against each other, a friction layer is formed on the surface of the harder material. Surface
materials properties are changed by heat and friction. This friction layer is responsible for
the tribological characteristics such as friction coefficient, vibration, and wear rate
16
In many cases, dry friction process leads not to transfer but to loss of material. This process
is known as "wear" (PML, 2009). Major types of wear include abrasion, adhesion
(friction), erosion, and corrosion. Wear can be minimised by modifying the material
properties or the surface properties of solids by surface engineering processes (also
called surface finishing) or by the use of lubricants (for frictional or adhesive wear) (PML,
2009).
the bearing. He also noted that as the shaft gained velocity, the liquid flowed between the
two surfaces at a greater rate. The viscous lubricant produced a liquid pressure in the
lubricant wedge that was sufficient to keep the two surfaces separated. Under ideal
conditions, Reynolds showed that this liquid pressure was great enough to keep the two
bodies from having any contact and that the only friction in the system was the viscous
resistance or viscosity of the lubricant.(MarineDiesels, 2011)
Viscosity of the lubricant is an important parameter: the higher the viscosity of the
lubricant, the higher the friction between lubricant and shaft but the thicker the
hydrodynamic film. However, friction generates heat. Heat will reduce the viscosity and,
therefore, the thickness of the film which may result in shaft-bearing contact. Reduced film
thickness occurs when a lubricant with low initial viscosity is used (MarineDiesels, 2011).
Care needs to be taken to ensure that the distance between the two surfaces is greater than
the largest surface defect. The distance between the two hydrodynamicaly sliding surfaces
decreases with higher loads on the bearing, lower speeds, and less viscous fluids. A
hydrodynamic regime is an excellent method of lubrication. This is because it is possible to
achieve coefficients of friction as low as 0.001 with no wear between the moving parts.
However, because the lubricant is heated by the frictional force and since viscosity is
temperature-dependent, special additives can be used to decrease the viscosity temperature
dependence (MarineDiesels, 2011).
18
Contact between the surfaces at a few high surface points (micro asperities) occurs during
boundary lubrication and then mixed lubrication as shown in Figure 2.6.
Mixed lubrication is the intermediate regime between boundary lubrication (where friction
is mostly due to asperity contact), and hydrodynamic lubrication (where the hydrodynamic
separation is achieved) (Qiang, 2009).
Friction-induced vibrations in boundary and mixed regimes are of particular concern to the
designers of mechanical applications involving sliding surfaces at comparatively low
speeds (up to 5 m/s) (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996, Tworzydlo et al., 1994). These
applications include liquid-lubricated bearings, wheel-rail systems, disk brake systems, and
machine tool-work piece systems. Numerical analyses to predict vibrations and noise such
as chatter and squeal in a mixed regime have not been developed, and no appropriate
theory exists that can be generalised to analyse these vibrations. Most research activities
are based on experimental tests of physical models. In general, friction-induced vibrations
on boundary and mixed regimes vary and depend on temperature, normal load, speed, and
other conditions (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996).
According to Weichsel (1994), modern plain bearings can be divided into three basic
categories based on the lubricant system required for successful operation:
Bearings that require oil, grease or some other lubricant to operate. They receive
this liquid or semi-solid lubricant from an outside source.
Bearings that contain the necessary lubricant within their walls: i.e., a plastic
bearing such as polyacetal, which utilises a silicone lubricant.
Bearings that are in and of themselves the lubricant, such as metallised carbon
graphite or have a running surface that contains Teflon.
Contemporary aft water-lubricated bearings are plain bearings that require lubrication by
sea water. The problems of power loss, vibration, and wear associated with water-
20
lubricated bearings are of great interest to researchers (Rac and Vencl, 2005, Hori, 2006,
Kingsbury, 1997).
1.
Static friction, where two static surfaces are mostly in contact with each other.
2.
Boundary lubrication, where the fluid films are negligible and sufficient asperity
contact exists.
3.
Partial fluid lubrication (transition or mixed) where two surfaces are partly
separated, partly in contact and the relative motion of the surfaces is insufficient to
generate the hydrodynamic action required to separate them completely (Ivanov
and Ivanov, 2012, Barwell, 1984).
4.
21
Friction coefficient
Region 2
Region 1
Region 3
Region 4
Velocity
When a water-lubricated bearing starts up (Region 2), the combination of a low sliding
speed, low viscosity, and high load will produce boundary lubrication. Boundary
lubrication is characterised by the small amount of fluid in the interface and the large
surface contact. This results in extremely high friction (STLE, 2008, Solomonov et al.,
2010).
As the sliding speed and fluid viscosity increase, or the load decreases, the surfaces begin
to separate (Region 3), and a fluid film begins to form. The film is still insufficient but acts
to support more of the load. Mixed lubrication is the result of a fast drop in the friction
coefficient (STLE, 2008). This results in less surface contact and more fluid separation
(Neveu et al., 2012). Any of the following can prevent the build-up of a film thick enough
for hydrodynamic lubrication: insufficient surface area, a drop in the sliding speed of the
moving surfaces, reduced quantity of lubricant delivered to a bearing, an increase in the
bearing load; an increase in lubricant temperature resulting in a decrease in viscosity, or
contamination of the lubricant. If the film thickness is still insufficient, the highest
asperities may not be fully separated by lubricant (STLE, 2008, Solomonov et al., 2010).
The surfaces will continue to separate as the sliding speed or viscosity increase until full
fluid film separation has been achieved and no surface contact exists (Region 4). The
friction coefficient will reach its minimum and a transition to hydrodynamic lubrication
occurs. At this point, the load on the interface is entirely supported by the fluid film. There
22
is low friction and no wear in hydrodynamic lubrication since there is full fluid film
separation and no contact between asperities (STLE, 2008, Solomonov et al., 2010).
With an increase in the sliding speed, the friction increases further in the hydrodynamic
region due to fluid drag (friction produced by the fluid): higher speed may result in a
thicker fluid film, but it also increases the fluid drag on the moving surfaces. Thus, a
higher viscosity will increase the fluid film thickness but it will also increase the drag
(STLE, 2008, Solomonov et al., 2010).
Water-lubricated bearings experience boundary lubrication and mixed lubrication at startup and shutdown (low speeds and thin film) before the transition to hydrodynamic
lubrication at normal operating conditions (high speeds and thick film) (STLE, 2008). For
example, during start-up, as the sliding speed between the shaft and bearing increases, the
change from boundary lubrication to mixed and then to the hydrodynamic regime is not a
sudden or abrupt process (Dulias, 2002). A boundary-type and then mixed lubrication
occur first, and then as the surfaces slide faster, the hydrodynamic-type lubrication
becomes predominant with the change of the position of the journal shaft as shown in
Figure 2.8 (Kotousov, 2009, STLE, 2008, Solomonov et al., 2010).
R
P
o
hmin
Hydrodynamic Regime
(Region 4)
Boundary Regime
(Region 2)
23
Self-excited vibrations of the stick-slip type occur at very low sliding speeds
(typically 0-0.3 m/s) that can be associated with start-up or shutdown. They are
attributed to the difference between the static and kinematic coefficient of friction
(Dautzenberg, 1986). At low sliding speeds, friction between the interacting
surfaces is a result of the bearing surface characteristics and properties of the
lubricant traces other than viscosity, such as metalliquid adhesion energy. The
adhesion energy is expressed as surface wettability, the actual process in which a
liquid spreads on a solid substrate or material (Younes, 1993).
Many attempts have been made to investigate and analyse friction-induced vibrations in
water-lubricated bearings. For example, Simpson and Ibrahim (1996) conducted a series of
experiments to examine the mechanism for generating vibrations in water-lubricated
bearing systems. Their study suggested that the presence of water-lubricated bearing
24
vibration is associated with both the contact mechanics of the bearing and the dynamic
characteristics of the structural components of the bearing system (Simpson and Ibrahim,
1996).
Simpson and Ibrahim (1996) considered several mechanisms which can give rise to
friction-induced vibrations in water-lubricated bearings. They stated that, when one of the
sliding surfaces is characterised by a certain degree of elastic freedom, the motion may not
be continuous, but may be intermittent and proceed as a stick-slip process. During stickslip motion, two different deformation mechanisms take place. The first is elastic
deformation, where the two contact surfaces stick and the asperities deform elastically. The
second is plastic deformation, where sliding takes place and the asperities deform
plastically (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996). The authors concluded that the occurrence of
stick-slip is unpredictable, mainly because the slope of the frictionspeed curve is not
constant but varies randomly with contamination, surface finish, misalignment of sliding
surfaces and other factors (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996). They experimentally simulated
bearing dynamics and derived a linear analytical model for water-lubricated bearings.
Different dynamic characteristics were identified from the numerical simulation of the
equations of motion. However, the role of nonlinearity, due to the frictionspeed curve,
was not considered (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996).
friction in mechanical systems depends on several factors that were classified by Ibrahim
(1994). These factors include the material properties, characteristics of the sliding surfaces
geometry, surface roughness and structure, normal load, sliding velocity, and temperature.
The numerical modelling and evaluation of the coefficient of friction, vibration, and wear
as functions of sliding speed have been the subject of numerous studies which considered
the influence of such factors as material properties, surface roughness, load, and type of
lubrication (Younes, 1993). Younes undertook investigation to determine the dynamic
behaviour of a rigid balanced rotor with its journals rotating semi-dry in their bearings.
Their equation of motion, with the exponential coefficient of friction model, has been
solved numerically to determine the vibration responses. Conditions for stability, the
increase of the system vibrations, and the planetary motion of the journal along the bearing
surface were reported for different design parameters (Younes, 1993).
A fast analytical method for evaluating design parameters such as load capacity, maximum
pressure, flow rate, power loss, and maximum temperature in the lubricant film of liquidlubricated bearings was developed by Hirani et al. (1997). According to Hirani (1997),
these parameters are either too involved because of the mathematical complexities of
hydrodynamics or are based on simple methods and design charts. To predict the
tribological characteristics of bearings, an analytical model was proposed which provides
results comparable with time-consuming techniques such as thermo-hydrodynamic,
adiabatic, and isothermal analysis. Finally, the design methodology was arranged in
26
analytical expressions and tabular form for adequate and easy prediction of load capacity,
loss of power, flow rate, and maximum temperature. These approaches allowed to avoid
majority of numerical and mathematical complexities (Hirani et al., 1997). However, due
to the continuous development of rotating machinery, this approach is rarely adequate for
conditions involving contaminated lubricants because of the complexity of the friction
mechanism. Further development is required to enable adequate predictions and to make it
easy to use for all practical applications.
Fas f as
Aa
P
At
(2.1)
where:
fas is the asperity sliding friction coefficient;
Aa is the actual area of contact;
At is the total area of contact when the film thickness is zero;
P is the bearing pressure.
Fv o
2A t A a
V
2c
h min
2A t
(2.2)
where:
f f as
Aa
2A t A a
V
2c
+ o
.
At
h min P
2A t
(2.3)
According to Pan et al. (1971), viscosity and speed always appear as a product in the
elastohydrodynamic theory of lubrication, and the lift-off sliding speed is roughly
proportional to the viscosity. The speed, at which full film separation between shaft and
bearing takes place, decreases with decreasing temperature.
10-1
Negative slope
10-2
Positive slope
10-3
0
According to Figure 2.9, the boundary and mixed regimes of lubrication for typical waterlubricated bearings are within the sliding speed range up to ~2 m/s (which is in agreement
with the Stribeck model) (Pan et al., 1971).
conclusions are:
1.
Most of the friction-induced vibrations takes place at low sliding speeds (typically
up to 2.0 m/s) where the slope of the friction coefficient with respect to the sliding
speed is negative (boundary-mixed regimes).
2.
The variation of the friction force, vibrations, and wear decrease as the speed of the
shaft increases to a critical speed above which the friction coefficient begins to
increase due to viscous shear (hydrodynamic regime).
The system model of a stern-tube bearing was considered by Simpson at al. (1996) who
developed an analytical nonlinear two-degree-of-freedom model for the water-lubricated
journal bearing, as shown in Figure 2.10. The mass, stiffness, and damping coefficient of
the tangential shear of the water-lubricated bearing are indicated by m1 , k 1 and c1
respectively. The constants ( k 2 and c 2 ) represent the stiffness and damping of the flexible
shaft which drives the disk of mass ( m 2 ) and of the mass moment of inertia ( I ) about the
shaft axis.
29
Bearing
Disk
k1
c1
k2
m1
m2, I
V
c2
Friction force
Figure 2.10 Analytical two-degree model representing a submarine aft waterlubricated bearing, as displayed in Simpson and Ibrahim (1996), p. 90, Figure 2
The non-linear response of this system which emulated the dynamics of a submarine
water-lubricated bearing shaft was investigated numerically. The influence of a time
variation of the sliding speed results in a time variation of the friction force. This time
variation of the friction force is found to be responsible for the occurrence of vibration and
noise (Simpson and Ibrahim, 1996).
While the vibrationwear relationship in most dynamic systems is often unknown, the
assessment of wear of the contacting surfaces of many dynamic systems, such as bearings
and sliders, by vibration monitoring using various shock pulse measurements, methods and
tools, has been employed by many researchers and industries (Jonson, 2000).
30
According to Chowdhury (2009), it was observed by several authors (Kato et al., 1982,
Maru et al., 2005, Maru et al., 2007b, Bryant and York, 2000) that the wear reduction
depends on interfacial conditions such as normal load, geometry, relative surface motion,
sliding speed, surface roughness of the contact surfaces, type of interacting materials,
system rigidity, temperature, humidity, type of lubrication, vibration and lubricant
contamination (Chowdhury and Helali, 2009).
Several studies have been conducted in which researchers have found that wear can be
reduced by vibration. Goto and Ashida (1984) found that ultrasonic vibration can
significantly reduce wear rates on Pin-on Disk (POD) experimental apparatus which uses a
steel pair of interacting materials. Bryant and York (2000) showed that micro-vibrations
(10-100 mm amplitude, 10-100 Hz) of a slider can reduce sliding wear by up to 50%,
particularly for rigid body rocking vibration. Moriwaki and Shamoto (1991) used
ultrasonic vibrations to reduce tool wear without damaging the surface finish. Kato et al.
(1982) also found that vibrations sometimes increased and sometimes decreased wear
rates, depending on the pairs of materials involved. In their experimental investigation,
Weber et al. (1984) used ultrasonic vibrations to extend carbide tool life in the machining
of glass (Chowdhury and Helali, 2009).
Chowdhury and Helali (2007) also considered the lack of correlation between wear rate
and other vibration-related operating parameters during an investigation of the wear
behaviour of mild steel under vertical vibration. Initially, the aim of their research was to
find a suitable correlation and a way of reducing wear rate, by applying a known,
controlled frequency and amplitude of vibration in a particular direction (Chowdhury and
Helali, 2009). A POD experimental test rig was used and results showed that the wear rate
31
at a particular amplitude decreases with increasing frequency of vibration. The authors also
found a reduction of the friction coefficient as a function of different amplitude and
frequency of vibration on a pair of materials comprised of mild steel. However, the wear
behaviour of mild steel and their dimensional analysis in relation to both frequency and
amplitude under vertical vibration required further investigation. It is expected that the
application of these results will contribute to the improvement of the performance of
different sliding mechanical systems (Chowdhury and Helali, 2009).
Structural damping (which refers to energy dissipation within the structure by addon damping devices such as an isolator, by structural joints and supports, or by
structural member's internal damping);
Speed control damping (when the vibrations of rotors can be reduced or eliminated
by a change of rotation speed);
Structural damping is not always sufficient to limit vibration and wear to within the desired
level. In these cases, magnetic damping may provide a solution.
32
Verichev at al. (2010) outlined the principles for damping lateral vibrations of rotary
systems and undertook an experimental study to investigate the effect of speed control
damping on lateral vibrations in rotating machinery using motor speed modulation. This
method was based on the generation of a harmonic additive to the constant speed of
rotation that provided significant damping of lateral vibrations at critical rotation speeds.
The analytical solution and numerical calculations proved this concept and showed a
significant decrease in the amplitudes of lateral vibrations compared to those in a similar
undamped system (Verichev, 2010).
Kasadra et al. (2004) considered rotor instabilities in rotating machinery due to reexcitation of the first rotors critical speed (when a rotors radian frequency is in a state of
resonance with a first natural frequency) resulting in lateral rotor vibrations at frequencies
below the rotors operating frequencies. They found that active magnetic dampers were
very promising for reducing or even eliminating rotor vibrations regardless of the
excitation source. Experimentally, it was shown that an active magnetic damper was used
to effectively add damping to reduce a rotors vibration response. The experimental results
also demonstrated that the active magnetic damper can significantly dissipate the
vibrational energy and prevent system dynamic characteristics such as natural frequency,
which may lead to an increase in rotor vibrations (Kasarda, 2004).
33
Experimental tests using a POD-type sliding system have indicated that the friction force,
vibration, and wear depend mostly on the normal load for a constant sliding speed (Qiao
and Ibrahim, 1999). According to Qiao (1999), depending on the value of the normal load,
four different friction regimes were observed:
1.
The steady-state friction regime where the frictional force increases linearly with
the normal load.
2.
The non-linear friction regime where the friction force increases non-linearly with
the normal load and the coefficient of friction is no longer constant but increases
with the normal load.
3.
4.
The self-excited vibration regime where the friction force drops to a low value and
is accompanied by high-amplitude periodic self-excited oscillations.
34
Maru et al. (2007a and 2007b) presented the results of an investigation into the effect of
lubricant contamination by solid particles on the dynamic behaviour of bearings to
determine the trends in the amount of vibration induced by contamination of the oil and by
the bearing wear itself. Experimental tests were performed with radial ball bearings
lubricated in an oil bath. Quartz powder at three concentration levels and in different
particle sizes was used to contaminate the oil. Vibration signals were analysed in terms of
the root mean square (RMS) values. The results showed that changes in the RMS values of
vibration in the high-frequency band, from 600 to 10,000 Hz, were associated with changes
in the oil lubrication of the bearing as a result of contamination and wear damage to the
bearing surfaces. It was shown that the effect of contaminant concentration on vibration
was distinct from that of particle size. The vibration level increased with the percentage of
concentration, tending to stabilise at a particular limit. On the other hand, as the particle
size increased, the vibration level first increased and then decreased. Vibration level
35
increased during the test in contaminated oil only after 16 minutes of testing. Such an
increase in vibration was related to an effect produced by the wear of the bearing elements.
The bearing surfaces were reported to be severely damaged by a three-body abrasive
mechanism distributed along all the surfaces. Abrasion was also identified through
ferrography, a microscopic technique for analysing the particles present in fluids that
indicate mechanical wear. This indicated a severe wear regime, although measurements of
internal radial clearance of the bearings are reported to have shown an absence of
dimensional wear. The amount of vibration due to bearing wear was dependent on the
contamination level. A correlation was observed between the trends of the wear due to
bearing vibration and those of its overall surface damage. The vibration due to the presence
of particles was shown to be proportional to the vibration of the worn bearing as particle
concentration increased. On the other hand, when the contaminant particle size increased,
the dynamic action of the particles passing through the contact interface increased, but the
vibration level of the worn bearing was the same. The vibration due to the larger particles
is reported to be reduced due to the particle settling phenomenon (the decrease in vibration
with larger particles suggested that it was more difficult for larger particles to go into the
contact interface and, therefore, the vibration of the respective worn bearing was reduced)
(Maru et al., 2007a, Maru et al., 2005, Maru et al., 2007b).
36
A Pin-on-Disk (POD) experimental apparatus has been chosen to investigate the effect of
water contamination and damping on friction, vibration, wear behaviour and the vibration
wear relationship in boundary and mixed regimes for water-lubricated bearings materials.
It is essential to qualify the effect of water contamination on the water-lubricated bearing
materials performance for developing design guidelines. At present, there are not design
guidelines available for water-lubricated bearing materials selection which experience
water contamination. It is therefore expected that this project will contribute to the
development of industry guidelines, and provide a better understanding and modelling
approach for the tribological process between materials used for water-lubricated systems.
37
The aft bearing of ships and submarines is most commonly a plain journal bearing which is
lubricated and cooled with sea water. The relationship between operational parameters and
the system, the bearing lubrication regimes (hydrodynamic, mixed [transition] or
boundary) and the dynamic motions associated with the aft bearing in operation are largely
unknown (Biswell, 2007, Cumberlidge, 2009, WRTSIL, 6/09/2007).
The main objective of the studies undertaken previously was to investigate the operational
characteristics of the aft bearing assembly as a part of the propulsion shaft system under
water contamination conditions. These studies provide an understanding of the current aft
bearing design requirements and provided a framework for future investigations on similar
systems (Solomonov, 2009, Solomonov et al., 2010).
which had silica particles added. The grit used was equivalent in particle size and shape to
that found in the Portland area of the UK, at concentration accepted by the UK Ministry of
Defence as representing of aggressive British coastal water. To simulate the worst water
conditions, and to accelerate the test, the concentration of silica was increased by a factor
of 10. The grit was kept in suspension in the sea water by a stirrer agitating the mixed
solution in the contaminated water tank. A pump was used to deliver the contaminated sea
water to and from the bearing. The flow rate was set at 7.5 litres per minute (Biswell,
2007, Cumberlidge, 2009, WRTSIL, 6/09/2007). Table 3.1 details the test parameters.
Table 3.1 Basic parameters for the Wrtsil wear tests (Biswell, 2007)
Parameters
Metric Units
ENISO 316
Sleeve diameter
50.8 mm
Shaft rotation
Bearing load
2500 N
Bearing pressure
4.8 kg/cm2
42 kg/cm2.m/min
7.5 litres/min
88 litres, agitated
The initial testing comprised running each material under the adopted conditions for a
duration of 100 hours, where the wear rate was measured at 20-hour intervals (Biswell,
2007, Cumberlidge, 2009, WRTSIL, 6/09/2007). To keep experimental results
consistent, all bearings were tested with the same geometry and configuration. This was
done to ensure that the performance and not the design of the bearing material was tested.
The results from the experimental wear tests for the different bearing materials are shown
in Figure 3.1.
39
Figure 3.1 Experimental wear rates for water-lubricated bearing materials (Biswell,
2007, Cumberlidge, 2009, WRTSIL, 6/09/2007)
As can be seen from the Figure 3.1, although all the materials were tested under the same
conditions, a difference in wear performance noticeable. Most materials performed well
during this period of time, except the elastomeric material, which showed significant
bearing wear. Smearing of the bearing material on the shaft and scoring on the shaft liner
were noted (Biswell, 2007, Cumberlidge, 2009, WRTSIL, 6/09/2007).
Lubrication contamination;
Radial clearance;
40
Sliding speed;
Bearing pressure;
Coolant flow.
A total of three test rigs were manufactured and two types of lubrication conditions were
used: clean tap water, and contaminated tap water with added sand particles to simulate
contamination. The water was maintained at room temperature.
According to Kotousov (2009), the contaminated conditions were not specified but the
adding of sand particles seemed to be an appropriate way to create the contaminated
environment and investigate the qualitative response of the system to the contamination.
The duration of the long-term testing was approximately four months. It allowed the
achievement of a similar wear pattern as in an operational aft bearing system. This time
was sufficient to achieve a steady-state wear rate and to enable theoretical methods to be
applied to extrapolate the wear process for longer time periods.
Arch Support
Sleeve Housing
Assembly
Shaft
Assembly
Load Cell
Figure 3.2 Scaled test rig and major components, as displayed in Kotousov (2009), p.
13, Figure 3.2.1
The first test rig simulated the long-term operation of the aft bearing system in clean water
lubrication conditions. The second test rig aimed to simulate the long-term operation of the
aft bearing system in a contaminated water regime. The third test rig was used to
investigate the effects of alignment, lubrication contamination, radial clearance, sliding
41
speed, and roughness of the sliding surfaces on the tribological behaviour of the whole
system.
Measurements of friction were conducted using strain gauges mounted on the vertical arm
supporting the sleeve housing. Two sets of measurements were taken at different points on
the arm to reduce errors, and also to demonstrate the consistency of the measurement
technique.
Table 3.2 provides a summary of the parameters of the bearing system used to estimate the
thermal regime and power losses due to friction and vibrations.
Table 3.2 Basic parameters of the bearing system (Kotousov, 2009, Solomonov et al.,
2010)
Parameters
Experimental Rig
Bearing pressure
0-0.6 MPa
0-1.0 l/s
200-3000 rad/s
Shaft diameter
30 mm
Figure 3.3 presents the results of the experimental investigation of the coefficient of
friction against the sliding speed/shaft rotation speed under clean water lubrication.
42
0.03
Friction coefficient
Trend line
0.01
0
0
700
500
1000
1500
0.79
1.1
1.6
2.4
Figure 3.3 Friction curves vs. sliding speed, m/s (rotation speed, rpm), reproduced
from Kotousov (2009, p.18)
These results indicated that the friction coefficient is significantly affected by the sliding
speed. It changes from 0.03 at low speeds to 0.002 at high speeds of rotation (high sliding
speeds). It is interesting to note that these tendencies are in agreement with the theoretical
predictions made by Pan et al. (1971), especially for high sliding speeds. This boosts
confidence in the experimental technique adopted in this study. These results provide
information for the determination of the operating and temperature conditions as well as
for estimating the power losses in the oscillation-free regime.
Kotousov (2009) reported that the level of water contamination in the aft bearing system
was unknown and the results presented were aimed at providing a qualitative assessment of
the effect of the contaminated lubricant on friction, vibration, and noise characteristics of
the water-lubricated bearing system. Moreover, the water contamination was not constant
with time and it was extremely difficult to control and characterise the level of
contamination.
43
According to Kotousov (2009), the difference in the friction coefficient between the rig
with contaminated lubricant and the rig with clean lubricant operating in the mixed
lubrication regime was reported to be an order of magnitude. At the same time, the
difference between friction coefficients of the two test rigs operating within the boundary
regime is small, reaching 30-40%. Therefore, for a bearing intended to work in mixed and
hydrodynamic regimes, contamination of the lubricant is one of the major issues. However,
if the bearing is intended to operate in the boundary regime, the level of water
contamination does not appear to exert significant influence on the friction properties of
the system.
The wear rate due to water contamination was found to be five times higher than that for
the clean water. The friction in the clean lubricant environment left a smooth shiny surface,
whereas in the contaminated environment, the shell showed signs of heavy damage such as
deep footprints of abrasive damage.
1.
factor as, at very low friction conditions; the thermal regime does not require higher
flow rates than are currently used in the aft bearing system. However, this set of
improvements will work if one maintains the operational rotational speed of the aft
bearing above 40 rpm (sliding speed ~0.06 m/s). Below this critical speed of
rotation, the friction versus sliding speed curve for the tested materials has a large
negative slope which will lead and feed the friction-induced vibrations and
excessive wear. Consequently, additional measures are required if the bearing is
intended to operate below 40 rpm.
2.
For the boundary regime of operation, structural modifications to reduce the effect
of water contamination on the bearing assembly are required. In this case, the flow
rates should be much higher than those currently used to avoid overheating and
reduce the wear rates. The water-lubricated bearing system would also benefit from
filtering of the lubricant. This will significantly reduce the wear rates and keep the
surface in good condition.
3.
a separate cooling system to keep the temperature of the lubricant low (low
temperature of the lubricant increases its viscosity),
design of the additional lift pressure system to create a film layer between the
shaft and shell, etc.
3.4 Conclusions
The aim of the experimental studies (Biswell, 2007, Cumberlidge, 2009, Kotousov, 2009,
WRTSIL, 6/09/2007) was to provide a series of scaled model tests demonstrating the
long-term running and wear characteristics and the tribological behaviour of waterlubricated bearings under clean and contaminated water-lubricated regimes. The test rigs
simulated the lateral loading associated with the aft bearing system of a drive shaft used in
large boats and ships.
45
Their primary goal was to increase the efficiency and maintenance intervals of waterlubricated bearing systems.
Further extensive experimental and theoretical studies are therefore required to properly
investigate and understand the tribological behaviour and the physical consequences of a
variation in the material properties of composite materials used for water-lubricated
bearings.
The control of friction, wear, and vibrations in moving machine parts is a major problem
for many manufacturers and designers. It has become crucial to have quantitative data
obtained at varying operational conditions and in the presence of lubrication and
contamination (AIphaISS, 2009). POD experimental tribometers have proven their
reliability in many laboratories worldwide (AIphaISS, 2009, Dweib and D'Souza, 1990,
Aronov et al., 1983, Tworzydlo et al., 1994, Ibrahim, 1994a, Ibrahim, 1994b, Mosleh et al.,
2002, Qiao and Ibrahim, 1999, Tworzydlo et al., 1999, Chowdhury and Helali, 2007) for
studying new materials (ceramics, metals, polymers, composites); lubricants and
contaminant additives; self-lubricating systems; and quality assurance.
Compared to the scaled model of water-lubricated bearing test rig, a Pin-on-Disk
experimental apparatus can provide the following features (AIphaISS, 2009):
A pin is loaded onto the test disk with a more precisely known force
46
Based on the analysis of the previous experimental approaches and, together with the
conclusions outlined in within this chapter, the further POD experimental program was
developed and undertaken to investigate the effect of water contamination on the friction
coefficient, vibration, wear and the vibration-wear relationship under varying operational
conditions (Solomonov, 2009, Solomonov et al., 2010). The results and the discussion of
the POD experimental study are presented in the following chapters of this thesis.
47
CHAPTER 4
EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS
4.1 Introduction
A thorough understanding of the tribological behaviour of water-lubricated contact
surfaces during the design and development of new engineering applications is vital.
According to the literature review, the boundary and mixed regimes cause many
tribological problems. These problems can include vibration, power loss and excessive
wear. The simulation of friction in boundary and mixed regimes is difficult. To obtain a
good prediction of the overall performance of water-lubricated bearings, the precise
measurements of friction, vibration, and wear in the boundary and mixed lubrication
regimes are critical. The friction coefficient, vibration, and specific wear rate for a range of
sliding speeds, applied normal loads, and contaminated lubricants need to be collected and
analysed. In order to use this data in simulations and obtain a better understanding of the
tribological behaviour of sliding bodies, it is preferable to conduct these measurements on
small test samples where different operational conditions can be applied.
This chapter presents the test rig used for the experimental study of friction. Only the main
elements of the test rig and data acquisition methods are discussed.
POD tribometer is able to precisely measure the magnitude of friction, vibration, and wear
between two interacting surfaces (Dweib and D'Souza, 1990, Aronov et al., 1983,
Tworzydlo et al., 1994, Ibrahim, 1994a, Ibrahim, 1994b, Mosleh et al., 2002, Qiao and
Ibrahim, 1999, Tworzydlo et al., 1999, Chowdhury and Helali, 2007, CSM-Instriments,
2013). In one measurement, a flat or a spherical sample (pin) is placed on the rotating test
48
disk and loaded with a precisely known weight. The resulting frictional forces and
vibrations between the pin and the disk are measured and recorded. Additionally, the wear
of the sample is measured and calculated from the volume of the material lost during the
test (CSM-Instruments, 2013).
General requirements for a POD test rig are as following (CSM-Instriments, 2013):
High resolution obtained with unique frictional force measurement system design
A special POD test rig was designed and built to enable the precise measurements of
friction, vibration and wear for water-lubricated bearings materials. This POD test rig has
the capacity to be used for the study of friction, vibration and wear behaviour of any solid
combination of materials, for varying times, applied loads, sliding speeds, damping,
lubricants, contaminants, and fluids.
In POD tests, a load cell with a pin is held by an arm and loaded axially so that the pin is in
contact with a rotating disk, as shown in the schematic diagram in Figure 4.1.
49
1. Arm
2. Disk
3. Load cell
4. Pin
5. Strain gauge sensor
6. Displacement gauge
sensor
The initial stages of this project involved the design, building, and commissioning of a
POD test rig to study the effect of contaminated lubrication on friction, vibration, and wear
with variable sliding speeds and loads. The test rig needed to be robust and reliable with all
major control parameters such as sliding speed, applied normal load, water lubrication and
contamination, and friction force monitored and recorded using a computer-based data
acquisition device. Appropriate samples of available materials, operational conditions
including a range of sliding speeds, applied loads and levels of water contamination needed
to be chosen before commencement of the design process.
50
Range
Load force, N
8-50
Coefficient of friction,
0.1-1
0.3-4.5
Lubrication regimes:
Dry
Clean water
Contaminated water
(with 1%, 2%, 4% and 6% levels of
contamination)
Pin diameter, m
0.01
Disk diameter, m
0.3
BALDOR: MM3550C-57
GENESIS: NEMA-4X/IP-65
51
a) Motor
b) Frequency drive
Figure 4.2 Variable drive system: a) 3-phase BALDOR: MM3550C-57 motor with b)
GENESIS: NEMA-4X/IP-65 adjustable frequency drive
Fully reversible
The AC motor was equipped with the programmable, adjustable frequency drive
GENESIS: NEMA-4X/IP-65 to set the appropriate rpm speed.
The adjustable frequency drive (NEMA-4X/IP-65) had the following major parameters:
To obtain an appropriate sliding speed on the POD test rig, the AC motor was mounted on
the same base as the test rig and connected to the disk assembly using a pulley system. The
disk to motor pulley ratio was 13:1. This enabled a sliding speed range of 0.3 - 3.69 m/s,
which was required for the current experimental work. A digital tachometer model DT52
1236L was used for the calibration of the rotational speed. The calibration data of rpm
(LED display) versus actual sliding speed (at the point of pin-disk contact measured using
the DT-1236L) are shown in Figure 4.3. The calibration was conducted in accordance with
ASTM E74-06 Standard Practice of Calibration of Force-Measuring Instruments for
Verifying the Force Indication of Testing Machines (ASTM, 2006).
Figure 4.3 Calibration data for disk rpm versus sliding speed for the POD test rig
The load is applied using a series of dead weights together with a load cell assembly that
can slide vertically on the arm and produce a normal force of 8 N. To increase the value of
applied normal load, blocks each with weights of 0.97 kg (applied normal force 9.5 N)
were bolted to the top of the load cell an M10 screw. An example of a normal load of 17.5
N is shown in Figure 4.4.
53
Figure 4.4 Load cell with one additional weight block (applied force 17.5 N)
ASTM G 115-04 Standard Guide for Measuring and Reporting friction Coefficients
(ASTM, 2004b) was used for the bending arms design. According to this guide, the
measurement of dynamic friction force using elastic beams (bending arms) is one of the
recommended methods. To meet this standard guidance, the bending arm as a major
component of the friction force measuring system of the POD test rig weas designed and
fabricated to be elastic enough to measure the dynamic frictional force and stiff enough to
avoid the influence of negative bending arms dynamic motions, which could lead to stick slip behaviour or resonance. The major design requirements for the bending arms are
shown in Table 4.2.
54
Table 4.2 Design requirements for the bending arms used on the POD test rig
Requirements
Range
Load force, N
8-50
Coefficient of friction,
0.1-1
where:
F.S. = (y/ n)
n allowable normal stress, N/m2
y - yield stress, N/m2
Allowable strain range, strain
(1 10)10-3
where:
h hight of cross section area, m
b wigth of cross section area, m
Resonance condition
n >> max
where:
n natural frequency
max maximum frequency of disk
rotation
Stiffness condition
KS >> Ke
where:
bending arm
vibration measurement).
To meet these requirements, a maximum allowable normal stress, a natural frequency, and
stiffness for each arm needed to be calculated. The one degree of freedom cantilever beam
55
model with one fixed and one free end was used for these calculations (Sundararajan,
2009, Bhattacharjee, 2013, Gere, 2002, Feodosiev, 1974).
n= y/ F.S
(4.1)
where:
y is the yield stress (N/m2);
F.S. is the safety factor.
The cross sectional moment of inertia for a rectangular cross section area is given by:
I=(bh3)/12
(m4),
(4.2)
where:
b is the width of cross section area (m);
h is the height of cross section area (m).
(N/m),
(4.3)
where:
E is the modulus of elasticity (N/m2);
L is the effective length of arm (m).
(Hz),
(4.4)
where:
is the density of the arm (kg/m3);
A is the cross section area of the arm (m2).
The arm can be clamped at any one of nine positions. This allows the changing of the
contact point of the pin on the disk without changing the effective arm length as shown in
Figure 4.5b. The natural frequencies in the frictional direction corresponding to the four
values of stiffness, K1, K2, K3, and K4, were calculated. Table 4.2 presents the main
technical parameters of each bending arm.
56
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Stainless steel
Stainless steel
Aluminium
Aluminium
18 x 4.5
12 x 3
18 x 4.5
12 x 3
431.26
234.14
255.14
138.88
Stiffness, kN/m
117.1
23.14
40.3
7.96
Effective length, m
0.225
0.225
0.225
0.225
Material
Cross-section area,
h, mm x b, mm
Natural frequency,
Hz
The arms were manufactured from stainless steel or aluminium bar with a rectangular
cross-sectional area. To cover all ranges of applied forces, four bending arms were
fabricated.
To collect friction force data, four strain gauges were mounted to each arm. One of the
bending arms equipped with strain gauges is shown in Figure 4.5.
a)
b)
To measure the actual friction force, all arms were calibrated, friction force versus voltage
output, using a Digital Force Gauge, model 475040. For further experimental work,
bending arm 1 was chosen. The calibration data for bending arm 1 is shown in Figure 4.6.
The calibration was conducted in accordance with ASTM E74-06 Standard Practice of
57
Figure 4.6 Calibration data friction force versus voltage output for bending arm 1
The load cell can slide vertically on the bending arm. The arm can only bend horizontally,
providing a measurement of the actual friction force. At the same time, the load cell allows
the pin holder with the pin to slide within the load cell in a horizontal direction if
necessary.
springs are flexible in the direction tangential to the disk assembly. This allows measuring
of a sliding displacement of the pin within the load cell. The load cell is equipped with a
displacement sensor as shown in Figure 4.7.
a)
b)
Figure 4.8 Calibration data friction force vs. voltage output for load cell
59
A computer fitted with a DAQ card was used for recording the voltage outputs from the
displacement sensor and strain gauges. The USB-1408FS DAQ card was manufactured by
Measurement Computing Corporation. To acquire and log data from the DAQ card, the
applications InstaCal and TracerDAQ strip chart/data logger were installed on the desktop
computer. This allowed to record and analyse data received from the displacement sensor
and strain gauges separately or simultaneously. A schematic DAQ system diagram is
shown in Figure 4.9.
Figure 4.9 Schematic diagram of the data acquisition system used for the
measurements of pin displacement and arm forces on the POD test rig
The two amplifiers were used to take the input charge from the load cell accelerometer and
arm strain gauge to provide an output in the form of acceleration. The DAQ device
incorporates built-in integrators which provide displacement outputs.
Windows 2000 or XP
Adobe Reader
Pentium, 90 MHz
60
RAM 96 MB
PVC pipe of diameter 10 mm and length 1.5 m which is connected to the test rig
water collector to drain contaminated water.
To simulate the worst of the water-lubricated conditions, and to accelerate the comparative
friction and wear tests, the maximum percentage of contamination was increased by a
factor of 10 with respect to the normal concentration of sand in sea water (Polan et al.,
1981). The grit was kept in suspension in the water using a magnetic stirrer agitating the
water and silica in the supply tank. The schematic diagram of the water supply system is
shown in Figure 4.10.
Figure 4.10 Schematic diagram of the water supply system used on the POD test rig
61
The lubrication supply was uniform and thick enough to cover the Pin-Disk contact area.
Ordinary tap water was used as a lubricant because of its low viscosity. A rate of one drop
per second was applied to the disk track at a distance, approximately one cm ahead of the
pin-disk contact point. Visual control during experimental study confirmed that this water
rate was uniform and thick enough to create full water coverage in the Pin-Disk contact
area. The silica sand was introduced as a contaminant. The particle size range of the sand
was measured to be 53-106 m. The concentration range of the contamination was set at
1%-6%. Visual control (followed by microscopy analysis) confirmed that the sand particles
were distributed evenly under the pin in the Pin-Disk contact area.
Figure 4.11 Design sketch of the test rig identifying the major components
from the motor vibration to the DAQ system, the motor and the arm are isolated with
rubber pads.
The disk assembly consists a base disk with a test disk that is clamped on top. The test disk
can be changed using a clamping system above the base disk.
The experimental POD test rig, shown in Figure 4.12, was designed, built and
instrumented to investigate the friction between a pair of composite material-steel disk
under dry and water-lubricated conditions.
63
Mass loss
Speed of rotation
Applied load
Water contamination.
Validation study
Friction study
Wear study
Vibration-wear study.
Material samples were tested in pairs under dry and water-lubricated conditions. According
to the design requirements and scope of the project, the samples were pins fabricated from
selected material, which is commonly used in water-lubricated bearings and disk fabricated
from selected shaft material. The pin is pressed against the disk at a specified load using
dead weights.
64
The pins used for experimental runs were cylindrical and had a diameter of 10 mm and a
length of 15-20 mm. The test disk was 300 mm in diameter and had a thickness of 6 mm.
The surface roughness of the pin and the disk were measured to be 0.8 m Ra.
Before each experimental run, the following surfaces preparation procedures were used:
Both, the pin and disk surfaces were cleaned using ethanol and then gradually
polished using progressively finer wet and dry abrasive papers up to extra-fine 1200
grit
The pin was cleaned ultrasonically in an ethanol bath for one minute
The pin after removal from the ultrasonic cleaner ethanol bath and dried using high
pressure air, was weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g, and then carefully placed into the
pin holder of the POD test rig
The disk surface was also cleaned using ethanol and then dried using high pressure
air.
For each load, the friction force (Fx), normal force (Fy) and sliding speed (Vx) were
recorded. A trace of the friction force variation was also measured and recorded. The
friction force readings were taken at a rate of 100 samples per second for the one hour test
period.
The friction force was measured using the voltage outputs from the strain gauges on the
arm, and from these the friction coefficients were calculated. This procedure was repeated
three times. Friction force calculations were verified using a digital forcemeter in
accordance with ASTM E4 - 03 Standard Practise for Force Verification of Testing
Machines. The limit error was calculated to be +1.0 %, which was acceptable in
accordance with ASTM E4 03 (ASTM, 2003).
65
For each load, sliding speed and percentage of contamination, the friction force (Fx),
normal force (Fy), contamination (%) and sliding speed (Vx) were recorded. A trace of the
friction force variation was also obtained and recorded. During the test, friction force
voltage outputs were measured by strain gauges mounted on the loading arm and by the
displacement accelerometer mounted in the load cell. From these the friction force was
calculated. The friction force voltage outputs readings were taken at 100 samples per
second for the period of 60 minutes. For this purpose, a USB-1408FS microprocessorcontrolled data acquisition system was used. Each experimental run was repeated three
times and then the average of the measurements was recorded.
At the beginning of each experiment, the pin and the stainless steel disk were polished and
cleaned using the specimen preparation procedure outlined previously. The lubricant was
introduced and the pin and the disk were brought into contact for sufficient time, usually
one hour, to ensure full contact between the pin and the disk surface. The pin was then
removed, the mass measured accurately (up to four decimal places of a gram) and the pin
was placed in the pin holder at its original position. After wear-testing the pin over a
sliding distance of 15,000-16,000 m, the mass of the pin was remeasured using digital
scales and the difference and the mass loss determined. From this the specific wear rate
66
was calculated. Wear tests were repeated three times for each selected sliding distance,
sliding speed, applied load, and contamination level.
Wear tests results were recorded as mass loss in grams and specific wear rate in square
meters per Newton for the pin and plotted as mass loss/specific wear rate versus sliding
speed, applied load, and percentage of contamination.
The pin (Railko NF22) and the stainless steel disk surfaces were prepared according to
section 4.9.2 before each run. After the lubricant was introduced and the pin was brought
into contact with the rotating disk under a light predetermined normal load. The disk rpm
was set corresponding to a minimum (0.393 m/s) and maximum (1.557 m/s) sliding speeds
and contamination range of 0 - 2 %. After sufficient time for the pin and the disk to
achieve full contact, usually one hour, the pin was removed, the mass was measured
accurately (up to four decimal places of a gram) and then the pin was placed into the pin
holder at its original position. An8 N normal load was then applied for the tests.
For each condition (damped and undamped), sliding speed and contamination, the friction
force (Fx), normal force (Fy), contamination (%), sliding speed (Vx) and mass loss were
recorded. A trace of the friction force variation was also obtained and recorded. During the
test, the friction force voltage outputs were measured by strain gauges mounted on the
loading arm and by a displacement accelerometer mounted in the load cell. The friction
force voltage outputs readings were taken at 100 samples per second for the period of 60
minutes. For this purpose, the USB-1408FS microprocessor-controlled data acquisition
system was used. After testing, the pin mass was measured by the digital scales and the
difference was calculated as mass loss and specific wear rate calculated. Vibration-wear
tests were repeated three times for selected sliding distance, sliding speed, condition
(damped/undamped) and lubrication and the average of mass loss measurements was
recorded.
67
The specimens were cleaned prior to examination with alcohol in an ultrasonic bath for one
minute followed by drying in compressed air.
Using these methods of examination allowed the investigation of the effect of water
contamination on the pin and disk materials microstructures before and after wear tests to
reveal any possible surface changes.
4.11 Conclusions
The POD test rig was designed and built in accordance with the initial design requirements
with some minor adjustments. An experimental methodology was developed.
The purpose of the POD test rig and the developed experimental technique was to analyse
the performance of various bearing materials in dry, clean water-lubricated and highlycontaminated water conditions against a stainless steel counterface material. To try to
simulate the worst of the water-lubricated conditions, and to accelerate the comparative
friction and wear tests, the maximum percentage of contamination was increased by a
factor of 10 with respect to the normal concentration of silica in sea water. A PVC pipe
was used to deliver the gritted solution to the pin-disk contact area.
Using these experimental methods, the following experiments were conducted and the
results are presented in this thesis:
68
CHAPTER 5 Materials
CHAPTER 5
MATERIALS
5.1 Introduction
The metallic antifriction materials (such as gun metal, steel and aluminium alloys) that are
able to work with oil lubrication are conventionally used in liquid-lubricated bearings
designs. In recent years, increasingly close attention has been given to environmentallyfriendly water-lubricated bearings as a cheap and reliable alternative. According to Litwin
(2009), bearings made from polymer-based composites are often used when aggressive
environments prevent the application of other materials (Litwin, 2009).
Another substantial difference between the design of the water-lubricated bearings and
many other bearing systems is the selection process of the materials. The problems with
high performance materials for water-lubricated bearings are particularly relevant to ship
and submarine engineering applications.
According to Rac and Vencl (2005, p.15), apart from adequate strength, the materials for
water-lubricated bearings must also have other crucial characteristics. This is to satisfy the
requirements for reliable and long-lasting operation. These characteristics include low
friction, vibration, good thermal resistance and wear resistance. Rac and Vencl (2005,
p.15) also reported that the mechanical loading is a function of strength of the bearing
materials, while the limits of the thermal loading are determined by the thermal stability of
the selected material (Rac and Vencl, 2005).
Rac and Vencl (2005, p.15) discussed that, with water-lubricated bearings, there is no
direct relationship between the physical and mechanical properties of the materials and the
water-lubricated bearing performance. Parameters, such as the thickness of the lubricant
film, the applied load, and the temperature of the water-lubricated bearing do not depend
on the type of materials used. However, they do have an influence on the materials
behaviour and, as a consequence, on the selection of the suitable materials (Rac and Vencl,
2005).
Rac and Vencl (2005, p.15) also suggested that water-lubricated bearings materials must
also possess a series of other characteristics that are related to the wear resistance and the
69
CHAPTER 5 Materials
surface layer properties. Those characteristics are identified as tribological and include
conformability, embeddability, compatibility, deformation, wear, corrosion, and fatigue
resistance (Rac and Vencl, 2005).
Rac and Vencl (2005, p.15) stated that the tribological behaviour is not just a function of
the bearing material, but also of the surface finish, the lubricant, the design, and the
conditions of the environment in which the bearing operates. The complexity of the
tribological properties of bearing materials and their strong system-dependent properties is
thus explained (Rac and Vencl, 2005).
It was decided that the proposed experimental work to investigate friction, vibration, and
wear using a POD test rig would include wear modes including fracture, tribochemical
effects, and material loss. According to Unal et al. (2004), transitions between regions
dominated by each of these damage modes can give rise to changes in the friction
coefficient, amplitude of vibration, and wear rate with load, sliding speed, and
contamination (Unal et al., 2004). Therefore, the proper selection of materials is essential.
This chapter presents an analysis of contemporary polymer-based materials for waterlubricated bearings and of the selection of the materials available for further experimental
work.
70
CHAPTER 5 Materials
Figure 5.1 Typical baseline of viscosity of water vs. temperature T, 0C, reproduced
from Ginzburg et al. (2006, p.696), Figure 2
The low viscosity of water means that the water-lubricated bearings operate in boundary
and mixed regimes during initial start-up and shutdown. The effects of boundary and
mixed lubrication are determined by the properties of the contacting materials and their
surfaces.
In the case of water contamination, preliminary filters or other devices are commonly used
to remove the contaminants. However, these measures frequently fail to prevent ingress of
soil, sand, clay, or other impurities into the gap between the contacting surfaces. Figure 5.2
provides an example of the severe effect of abrasive wear due to water contamination in
water-lubricated bearings, as reported by Litwin (2009).
71
CHAPTER 5 Materials
a)
b)
Polan et al (1981) stated that the abrasive nature of wear due to water contamination needs
to be taken into account when choosing the materials for experimental work. The extent of
this wear depends on the operation regime in the Stribeck curve (Polan et al., 1981).
As contaminants find their own way into the clearance, the nature and extent of subsequent
damage will be determined by the properties of the materials. If the contaminants are softer
than these materials, the damage will be insignificant. If, however, the contaminant
particles are harder than the contacting materials, the softer surface will suffer scuffing. As
was shown in the literature review in Chapter 2, little or no information is available on
abrasive wear resistance when operating with contaminated water.
Many friction applications operating in the boundary and mixed regimes of lubrication are
characterised by a low range of sliding speeds, frequent surface interruptions, a wide range
of loads, and a comparatively short sliding distance during the lifecycle.
72
CHAPTER 5 Materials
The main materials used for water-lubricated applications are rubber, ceramics, carbon,
polymer-based materials, and composites of these materials.
For the proposed validation study, PTFE was chosen because many previous experimental
studies have been undertaken that are considered PTFE material and its composites for
sliding applications, and its tribological behaviour is well known (Bayer, 2002, Ginzburg
et al., 2006, Ledocq, 1973, Yamajo and Kikkawa, 2004). Typical physical properties of
PTFE are shown in Table 5.1.
73
CHAPTER 5 Materials
Properties
Value
Density, g/cm3
2.2
Melting point, C
327
500
23
Coefficient of friction
0.05 - 0.1
50
Water absorption, %
0.001
A typical PTFE sample used for the validation study presented in this thesis is shown in
Figure 5.3. In accordance with the initial requirements and test rig design specifications,
this sample was fabricated to have a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 20 mm. It also
contains an M8 threaded section for securing the pin into the pin holder during the tests.
Figure 5.3 PTFE test sample used during the validation study
74
CHAPTER 5 Materials
Phenol-formaldehyde resins have been used for quite some time as a matrix with cotton
cloth or synthetic fibres as the reinforcing materials. A group of materials suitable for
reliable water-lubricated applications is carbon-fibre reinforced composite with
thermosetting matrices.
One of these materials (NF22 [Railko]) was available for this current experimental work.
Railko NF22 material was developed in the early 1980s for water-lubricated and dry
bearing systems and according to Cumberlidge (2009), this bearing material has been
especially designed to cope with extreme operational conditions such as loads, speeds,
temperature fluctuations, water contamination, etc. It is reported by Cumberlidge (2009)
that this material is used by more than 30 Navies around the world for water - lubricated
bearings on ships, ferries and submarines (Cumberlidge, 2009).
Depending on the application and grade, NF22 (Railko) can operate dry, partially
lubricated, or fully lubricated in oil or sea water (Cumberlidge, 2009). Typical physical
properties for the NF22 (Railko) material are shown in Table 5.2.
75
CHAPTER 5 Materials
Properties
Value
Density, g/cm3
1.64
1800
1000
radial
450
axial
250
41000
310
310
55
continuous
100
occasional
120
35
Izod unnotched
75
41
Brinell hardness, HB
29
<1
0.25-0.4
radial
60
axial
40
Hardness, KJ/m
85
0.74
F1.I3
NF22 (Railko) material was chosen as the primary material for the experimental
investigation of friction, vibration, and wear because, according to the Wrtsil manual
76
CHAPTER 5 Materials
An NF22 (Railko) sample used for the experimental study is shown in Figure 5.4. In
accordance with the initial requirements and test rig design specifications, this sample was
fabricated to have a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 15 mm. It also features an M8
threaded section to secure it in the pin holder during tests.
To simulate water-lubricated bearing shafts, an AISI 440C stainless steel material was
chosen as the disk material for the experimental studies presented in this thesis. The typical
chemical composition in weight percent (%) is:
Carbon - 1.08;
CHAPTER 5 Materials
Chromium - 17.0
Molybdenum - 0.75
Phosphorus 0.04
Sulphur 0.03
Iron - Balance.
Disk thickness, 6 mm
A fabricated stainless steel test disk, fitted on the POD test rig for experimental study, is
shown in Figure 5.5. It has eight clamp holes to secure it to a base disk during the
experimental work.
Figure 5.5 AISI 440C stainless steel test disk fitted on the POD test rig
78
CHAPTER 5 Materials
5.4 Conclusions
In accordance with the materials requirements, the waterlubricated bearings materials
were selected so as to investigate the process of friction, vibration, and wear with the
different load (0-50 N) and sliding speed (0.3-4.5 m/s) ranges in dry, boundary, and mixed
lubrication regimes.
The test disks and sample pins were fabricated from the same materials as used in
commercial water-lubricated bearings, e.g.:
For the experimental study: NF22 (Railko) (pin), stainless steel (disk).
The cylindrical pin specimens, 10 mm in diameter and 15-20 mm in length, were tested
against an AISI 440C stainless steel disk. The surface roughness, prior to the disk testing,
was measured to be 0.8 m Ra.
The aim of this chapter was to analyse the performance of various water-lubricated
bearings materials in dry, water-lubricated and highly abrasive conditions, against a
stainless steel counterface material.
This chapter presented a review of contemporary water-lubricated bearings materials, their
analysis and selection of available materials for the following validation study and
experimental investigations, which are presented in the next chapters of this thesis
79
CHAPTER 6
VALIDATION STUDY
6.1 Introduction
A POD test rig validation study program was set up to verify the capability of the newlydesigned and fabricated test rig. These validation friction tests were conducted under dry
lubrication at a sliding speed of 0.32 m/s and a normal applied load range of 8 - 36.5 N.
The results were compared with the published results (Godfrey, 1995, Unal et al., 2004,
Yamajo and Kikkawa, 2004).
To determine if the experimental test rig would meet existing regulations (ASTM
E4-03 Standard Practise for Force Verification of Testing Machines and ASTM
G115-04 Standard Guide for Measuring and Reporting Friction Coefficients).
The technical parameters, including the specific test conditions and experimental samples
adopted for the validation study are provided in Table 6.1.
80
Parameters
Experimental Rig
8N
17.5 N
27 N
36.5 N
Lubrication
Dry
Sliding speed
0.32 m/s
Materials:
Disk
Pin
A number of POD experimental studies have been conducted to examine the influence of
test speed and load values on the friction and wear behaviour of pure PTFE, glass fibre
reinforced PTFE, bronze and carbon filled PTFE polymers (Godfrey, 1995, Unal et al.,
2004, Yamajo and Kikkawa, 2004).
Unal et al (2004) carried out the friction and wear tests versus AISI 440C stainless steel
disk were conducted on a Pin-on-Disk test rig at a dry condition. Tribological tests were at
room temperature, using 5 N, 10 N, 20 N, and 30 N loads and at 0.32 m/s, 0.64 m/s, 0.96
m/s and 1.28 m/s speeds. These experimental results were used to validate a newly built
POD test rig (Unal et al., 2004).
The current validation study, presented in this Chapter, was conducted at room
temperature. To measure the friction force under dry regime, a constant sliding speed of
0.32 m/s was selected. The load was incrementally increased from 8 N to 36.5 N.
81
Each run was repeated three times. The error bars represent the variation of the friction
coefficients calculated from measured friction forces.
Figure 6.1 Coefficient of friction of the PTFE pin against a stainless steel disk for a
sliding speed of 0.32 m/s
The experimental measurements of the friction forces and calculated friction coefficients
were in good agreement with experimental results reported in the literature (Unal et al.,
2004, Godfrey, 1995, Yamajo and Kikkawa, 2004).
The experimental results of the validation study show that for the PTFE material, the
coefficient of friction decreases with an increase in applied load. This effect is known for
polymers that are visco-elastic materials and their deformation under applied load is viscoelastic. Thus, the variation of the friction coefficient with the load for visco-elastic
materials is given by the following equation (Unal et al, 2004):
=kN(n-1)
(6.1)
where:
is the coefficient of friction;
82
6.4 Conclusions
A newly built POD experimental test rig has been used for a validation study of the effect
of an applied normal load on the friction coefficient under dry friction conditions.
The experimental results of the validation study show that for the PTFE - stainless steel
materials the coefficient of friction decreases with an increase in normal load due to viscoelastic deformations.
It was investigated and confirmed that the obtained results of validation study are in a good
agreement with published experimental results.
Wear and vibration-wear validation is not required for the POD test rig in accordance with
ASTM E4-03 Standard Practise for Force Verification of Testing Machines where A
testing machine shall be verified as a system with the force sensing and indicating devices
in place and operating as in actual use (ASTM, 2003). Digital scales were used to
measure the mass loss of the pin used in these wear and vibration-wear tests. These digital
scales are not a part of POD arrangement; they were verified apart from this project as
laboratory equipment.
84
Contamination, 0-6%.
The experimental study was conducted in accordance with ASTM G115-04 Standard
Guide for Measuring and Reporting Friction Coefficients (ASTM, 2004b).
The selected test parameters for the experimental study of friction characteristics are given
in Table 7.1.
Experimental Rig
8N
17.5 N
26 N
36.5 N
46 N
Lubrication
Water-lubricated
Water contamination
0%
1%
2%
4%
6%
Sliding speeds
0.393 m/s
0.767 m/s
1.158 m/s
1.557 m/s
Test duration
1 hour
Disk diameter
0.3 m
Pin diameter
0.01 m
53 106 m
Materials:
Disk
Pin
86
The first set of experiments was conducted at room temperature under dry and clean water
lubrication conditions. A constant sliding speed (0.393 m/s) was selected and the load was
incrementally increased from 8 N to 46 N. The friction force was recorded by measuring
voltage outputs from the strain gauges on the arm, and from this data the friction
coefficients were calculated. This procedure was repeated three times for each sliding
speed of 0.767 m/s, 1.158 m/s and 1.557 m/s under both dry and water lubrication
conditions. The purpose of these tests was to collect base data on the variation of the
friction coefficient with changing normal load under dry and clean water lubrication and to
identify the boundary and mixed lubrication regimes for clean water.
The second set of experiments was also conducted under dry and clean water lubrication
conditions. The sliding speed was increased gradually from 0 m/s to the maximum possible
sliding speed of 3.69 m/s at each load of 8 N, 17.5 N, 27 N, 36.6 N and 46 N, respectively.
The friction force voltage outputs were measured and recorded, and friction coefficients
were calculated. This procedure was repeated for all sliding speeds (0.767 m/s, 1.158 m/s
and 1.557 m/s). The purpose of this second set was to investigate the effect of sliding speed
on the friction coefficient and to enable the identification of the boundary and mixed
lubrication regimes with clean water lubrication.
Figures 7.1 and 7.2 illustrate the experimental results for variations of the friction
coefficient values for the NF22 (Railko) pin against the stainless steel disk. The tests were
87
Figure 7.1 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel
versus normal applied load under dry conditions
The dependence of the friction coefficient on the relative velocity between sliding surfaces
is complex and depends on the material properties at the interacting surfaces. In dry sliding
contact between interacting surfaces, friction can be modelled as elastic and plastic
deformation forcing microscopic asperities into contact. The friction force can be described
by the following equation reproduced here from Ibrahim (1994a, p. 218, Eq. 15):
F1(Pn)=fas (Aas/At) Pn
(7.1)
where:
F1(Pn) is the friction force due to asperity contact (N);
fas is the asperity sliding friction coefficient;
Aas is the real area of contact (m2);
At is the total area of contact (m2);
Pn is the contact load (N).
88
According to this equation (Ibrahim, 1994a), increasing the load leads to greater contact
between the asperities and therefore, a higher friction coefficient.
Figure 7.2 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel
versus sliding speed under dry conditions
For dry conditions, the friction coefficient increases with increasing load and sliding speed.
The frictionspeed curves are non-linear and are dependent on three factors; the material
properties of the sliding surfaces, the normal load, and the medium which occupies the gap
between them. The NF22 (Railko) material has three phases (matrix and organic fibres)
and a solid lubricant. According to Mosleh et al (2002), increasing the applied normal load
increases the friction force due to increasing the area of asperity contact (Mosleh et al.,
2002). The nonlinearity of the friction coefficientspeed curve dependence is in strong
agreement with the literature and is attributed to the creep deformation of the interface
asperities (Martins, 1990). More advanced examples of dry friction models of this
mechanism were described in the literature by Marklund and Larsson (2008) where the
89
friction coefficient was found to be a function of speed and temperature in addition to the
normal load (Marklund and Larsson, 2008).
Figures 7.3 and 7.4 illustrate the experimental results of variations in the friction
coefficient values for an NF22 (Railko) pin against a stainless steel disk tested at room
temperature using clean water lubrication, at 8 N, 17.5 N, 27 N, 36.5 N, and 46 N loads,
and at various sliding speeds.
Figure 7.3 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel
versus normal load under clean water-lubricated conditions
It can be seen from Figure 7.3 that the value of the friction coefficient decreases with
increasing load and sliding speed. This is the opposite effect to that found under dry
lubrication conditions. The normal load exerts slightly less influence on the friction
coefficient than sliding speed, particularly at high speeds. Marklund and Larsson also
reported that the friction coefficient was not particularly load dependent (Marklund and
Larsson, 2008).
90
Figure 7.4 better illustrates the relatively small influence that the normal load has on the
coefficient of friction, particularly at higher speeds. The largest difference in the value of
the coefficient of friction for different normal loads is approximately 0.18 which is at the
lowest sliding speed of 0.393 m/s.
Figure 7.4 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel
versus sliding speed under clean water-lubricated conditions
This type of friction behaviour (NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel) was
explained in the literature by the elastohydrodynamic theory of lubrication and theory of
asperity contact (Unal et al., 2004, Godfrey, 1995, Ibrahim, 1994a). In the zones of real
contact, all types of deformation (elastic, elastoplastic, and plastic) can occur. The friction
coefficient for materials with a high modulus of elasticity changes during plastic contact as
the load increases, as shown in Figure 7.4. This change is due to the interaction between
asperities and deformation processes in the zones of real contact. The maximum friction
coefficient conforms to elastic asperities contact and the transition to a state where the
interaction between irregularities begins to affect the deformation processes in the zones of
real contact. The decrease of the friction coefficient due to increasing load is a result of
transition from elastic asperity contact to plastic deformation at the points of contact. The
91
increasing load makes asperities in contact plastically deform which may release the solid
lubricant; in conjunction with water, this provides better lubrication by creating a wedge of
lubricant and reducing the friction coefficient as stated in Unal et al (2004).
It is evident that the friction coefficient of NF22 (Railko) material against stainless steel
under clean water lubrication conditions is much more dependent on the sliding speed than
on the normal applied load. According to the Stribeck model, all this experimental work is
within either boundary or mixed regimes of lubrication. Olsson et al (1997) reported that,
the total friction force at contact consists of two components; one is due to asperity contact
(equation 7.1) and the second is due to hydrodynamic viscous shear (Olsson et al., 1997):
F2(V)=Fc V
(7.2)
where:
F2 is the friction force due to hydrodynamic viscous shear (N);
Fc is a constant, dependent on lubricant viscosity, area of contact and minimum film
thickness of the lubricant in the hydrodynamic regime (N/m/s);
V is the sliding speed (m/s).
The negative slope (boundary and mixed regimes) of the Stribeck model is clearly seen
in the experimental results, shown as Figures 7.3 and 7.4.
Figures 7.5 to 7.8 present the graphs of the experimental results of the friction coefficient
for NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel under contaminated water-lubricated conditions,
at 8 N, 17.5 N, 27 N, 36.5 N, and 46 N loads, at 0.393 m/s, 0.767 m/s, 1.158 m/s, and
1.557 m/s sliding speeds, and at various levels of water contamination of 1%, 2%, 4%, and
6%, respectively.
92
Figure 7.5 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 1%
contaminated water lubrication
Figure 7.6 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 2%
contaminated water lubrication
93
Figure 7.7 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 4%
contaminated water lubrication
Figure 7.8 Coefficient of friction of NF22 (Railko) against stainless steel for 6%
contaminated water lubrication
These Figures show that the value of the coefficient of friction decreases with increasing
sliding speed and load, but increases with increasing water contamination.
94
When the results for contaminated water are compared with those for clean water
lubrication, the tribological behaviour can still be described by the Stribeck model. At
the same time, it can be seen that the friction coefficient increases with increasing
contamination due to the influence of the abrasive sand particles between interacting
bodies at all sliding speeds. Moreover, the maximum increase in the friction coefficient
was seen at the slowest sliding speed of 0.393 m/s due to asperity contact, as well as the
abrasive sand particles. For further analysis of the effect of water contamination on the
friction coefficient, the slowest sliding speed of 0.393 m/s which resulted in the largest
value of the friction coefficient was chosen. The results are shown in Figure 7.9.
Figure 7.9 Coefficient of friction vs. water contamination of NF22 (Railko) material
(sliding speed=0.393 m/s)
As mentioned above, friction in water-lubricated sliding bodies depends on friction due to
asperities contact, lubricant contamination, and hydrodynamic viscous shear friction.
95
Whether any nonlinearities due to the effect of water contamination on friction exist is not
yet known.
As seen on Figure 7.9, the friction force due to water contamination is a function of the
degree of contamination (g).
Thus, the total friction force under contaminated water lubrication can be described as
follows:
(7.4)
where:
F is the total friction force (N);
F1(Pn) is the friction force due to asperities contact force (N);
F2(V) is the friction force due to hydrodynamic viscous shear force (N);
F3(g) is the friction force due to water contamination (N).
The complex effect of water contamination on friction has not been thoroughly
investigated, however to simplify further investigations of friction due to water
contamination, it is assumed that F3(g) has a linear dependence of friction coefficient
against the level of water contamination (g).
7.4 Conclusions
A new experimental approach using the POD experimental apparatus for the study of the
effect of water contamination on the friction coefficient has been conducted. The
experimental range of sliding speeds was identified as being within the boundary and
mixed (transition) regimes of the Stribeck curve.
The effect of water lubrication and water contamination on the pair of materials
comprising NF22 (Railko) composite and stainless steel was experimentally investigated
and the following conclusions can be drawn:
96
1.
The friction coefficient of NF22 (Railko) composite material decreases when the
applied load is increased due to the material properties (solid lubricating
component and plastic deformation).
2.
The friction studies of the composite material (NF22 (Railko)) against an AISI
440C stainless steel disk under various loads, sliding speeds, and water
contamination show an increase in the friction force with increasing water
contamination.
3.
It is not yet known if any nonlinearities from the effect of water contamination on
friction exist. As a first iteration, it can be assumed that friction force due to water
contamination increases linearly with an increase in water contamination.
4.
For the specific ranges of loads and speeds investigated in this study, the sliding
speed has a greater effect than the applied normal load on the friction coefficient
for this composite material.
However, further extensive experimental and theoretical studies are required to properly
understand the effect of water contamination on friction and the physical implications of
variations in the material properties of composite materials used for engineering
applications.
A mathematical model of contact mechanics between the two friction surfaces is necessary
for the analysis and design of water-lubricated bearings materials under contaminated
water conditions. In this experimental work, a simple empirical linear assumption of
contact mechanics based on experimental results has been proposed (see Equation 7.4) for
water contamination at levels between 1% and 6%.
97
The next chapter uses the information from these experiments as a basis for the
investigation of the effect of water contamination on the mass loss and the specific wear
rate of materials used for water-lubricated bearings.
98
CHAPTER 8
8.1 Introduction
In engineering applications of water-lubricated bearings, where the water contains different
types of contaminants including solid silica particles, the use of wear-resistant materials is
required. According to Prehn (Prehn et al., 2005), in addition to the contamination by silica
particles, the water used for lubrication may also be chemically aggressive. For these
reasons, the choice of materials is limited.
To investigate the effect of water lubrication and contamination on the wear rate of
materials used for water-lubricated bearings
99
The parameters used for the experimental study of wear, including specific test conditions
and experimental samples, are provided in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1 Parameters for wear test
Parameters
Experimental Rig
8N
17.5 N
26 N
36.5 N
46 N
Lubrication
Water-lubricated
Water contamination
0%
1%
2%
4%
6%
Sliding speeds
0.393 m/s
0.767 m/s
1.158 m/s
1.557 m/s
Test duration
1 hour
Disk diameter
0.3 m
Pin diameter
0.01 m
53-106 m
Materials:
Disk
Pin
Stainless steel
NF22 (Railko)
This experimental work was conducted at room temperature. The POD test rig was run for
four hours before taking any measurements to ensure full contact between the pin and the
disk surface. For the first run of experiments, a constant sliding speed of 0.393 m/s and a
load of 8 N were used. Each run was repeated three times. After each run, the mass of the
100
pin was measured using digital scales and the mass loss recorded. Subsequently, the same
sliding speed was used; the load was increased in steps up to 46 N. The mass losses were
measured and recorded, and the specific wear rates calculated. This procedure was
repeated three times for all sliding speeds.
No measurable mass losses were recorded during wear tests under clean water lubrication.
The specific wear rate was therefore, zero. In the case of clean water lubrication, only
adhesive wear mechanisms are possible and adhesion is significantly reduced by
lubrication. This appears to be due to the specific material properties of the NF22 (Railko)
composite, which has a solid lubricant incorporated into its structure.
101
Figure 8.1 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values
under 1% water contamination
Figure 8.2 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values
under 2% water contamination
102
Figure 8.3 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values
under 4% water contamination
Figure 8.4 Mass loss for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed values
under 6% water contamination
103
From these graphs it is evident that the value of mass loss decreases with increasing sliding
speed and load, and increases with greater water contamination. Olsen et al (1997)
explained this effect as the adhesive wear mechanism is coupled with abrasive wear
mechanism under contaminated water lubrication. The presence of small particles of sand
between sliding surfaces gives rise to additional forces that strongly depend on the size and
material properties of the contaminants (Olsson et al., 1997).
Comparing the results with those of clean water lubrication, it is clear that the wear
mechanism can be described generally by adhesive-abrasive wear. This is where sand
particles are in contact with the surfaces of the pin and the disk, resulting in material being
displaced from the pin as well as the disk. At the same time, the mass loss increases with
increasing water contamination due to the role played by the abrasive sand particles
between contacting bodies. At the same time, it can be seen that the mass loss increases
with increasing water contamination due to the influence of abrasive sand particles
between interacting bodies at all sliding speeds in the range. Moreover, the maximum
increase in the mass loss was seen at the slowest sliding speed (boundary regime of
lubrication) of 0.393 m/s due to interactions between asperities as well as abrasive sand
particles. This speed was therefore, chosen for further analysis of the effect of
contamination on the mass loss. These results are shown in Figure 8.5.
Figure 8.5 Mass loss versus degree of water contamination for NF22 (Railko) material
at a sliding speed of 0.393 m/s
104
This graph suggests that, at low load, more sand particles are drawn into the contact area
which leads to greater mass loss. It is expected that with a change in particle size, the
character of this plot could be changed significantly. Figure 8.5 also shows that, the mass
loss due to water contamination is a nonlinear function of the degree of contamination. To
investigate the effect of water contamination as well as the type of contaminant, further
theoretical and experimental work is required. A theoretical three-body wear model is
necessary for determination of the wear mechanism under water contamination for further
stability analysis and design.
The task of obtaining a theoretical three-body wear model for these types of contact is
difficult due to the complexity of this mechanism with input variables of abrasive as well
as adhesive wear. It is therefore recommended for future work.
A micrograph of the pins surface before and after the full cycle of experiments is shown in
Figure 8.6.
a) before
b) after
Figure 8.6 Micrograph of pins worn surface before/after a full cycle of experiments,
at a magnification of X500
105
Despite the severe level of contamination, the images are similar and no visible structural
changes to the pins surface or embedded silica particles are evident. Torrance (Torrance,
2005) suggested that the process of wear depends on the mechanics of the contact between
the two surfaces entraining the abrasive particles, on particle size and percentage of
contamination, and often on chemical interactions between the wearing surface and the
surrounding media. It was reported in WRTSIL (2007) that it has generally been
assumed that the presence of organic fibres and solid lubricant in composite materials
makes it wear resistant.
Figure 8.7 presents the micrograph of the same worn surface of the pin. This micrograph
was obtained using an optical stereomicroscope. As seen from this Figure, the NF22
(Railko) material consists of two visible phases (matrix and organic fibres) creating good
wear resistance for this material.
Figure 8.7 Micrograph of pins worn surface after a full cycle of experiments, at a
magnification of X100
The micrographs of wear traces on the paired worn pins surface and stainless steel disk
are shown in Figures 8.8 and 8.9, respectively. Both samples were thoroughly cleaned,
using ethanol and compressed air, before microscopic examination.
106
As reported by Moore (1978), for abrasive particle contact with very low loads, the contact
will be predominantly elastic. Such contacts may result in material removal by surface
molecular mechanisms or from surface films or by Hertzian fracture of brittle materials
(Moore, 1978). As the load on an angular abrasive particle increases, contact on both
ductile and brittle materials will involve plastic deformation to a greater extent leading to
surface damage.
Figure 8.8 Micrograph of pins worn surface after a full cycle of experiments
Figure 8.9 Micrograph of stainless steel disks worn surface after a full cycle of
experiments, at a magnification of X100
107
It is clear that in spite of the good wear resistance of NF22 (Railko) material, the threebody abrasion wear mechanism could significantly damage both surfaces in a severely
contaminated water-lubricated environment although there are no visible structural
changes to the pin or sand particles embedded in the composite pin or steel disk.
Unal et.al (2004) reported the following calculation procedure which was adopted for this
experimental study. The sliding wear data reported here should be the average of at least
three runs. The average mass loss was used to calculate the specific wear rate (Unal et al.,
2004):
K0=m/L*F*
(m2/N),
(8.1)
where:
m is the average mass loss (kg);
L is the sliding distance (m);
F is the applied load (N);
is the density of the material (kg/m3).
L=v*t
(m),
(8.2)
where:
v is the sliding speed (m/s);
t is the duration of the test (s).
Figures 8.10 to 8.13 illustrate the specific wear rate values calculated for each test sliding
speed and normal load under contaminated water-lubricated conditions, at 8 N, 17.5 N,
27 N, 36.5 N, and 46 N loads, at 0.393 m/s, 0.767 m/s, 1.158 m/s, and 1.557 m/s sliding
speeds, and at 1%, 2%, 4%, and 6% water contamination, respectively.
108
Figure 8.10 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 1% water contamination
Figure 8.11 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 2% water contamination
109
Figure 8.12 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 4% water contamination
Figure 8.13 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material at different load and speed
values with 6% water contamination
It is clear that the sliding speed variation has little influence on the specific wear rate of the
NF22 (Railko) material, but the value of the specific wear rate increases with increasing
110
water contamination. As mentioned above, the most significant variation of specific wear
rate versus water contamination and applied load was seen at the lowest sliding speed as
displayed in Figure 8.14.
Figure 8.14 Specific wear rate versus degree of water contamination of NF22 (Railko)
material for a sliding speed of 0.393 m/s
Unal et al. (2004) stated that the wear process involves fracture, tribochemical effects, and
plastic deformation. Variation to the applied normal load and contamination lead to
transitions between regions dominated by each of these processes and commonly give rise
to changes in the specific wear rate. Furthermore, this result is closely related to structural
characteristics and chemical effects occurring in the frictional processes, as well as to
transfer film formation on the counterfaces (Unal et al., 2004).
For the NF22 (Railko) material tested in this experimental investigation within the sliding
speed range from 0.393 m/s to 1.558 m/s, the speed and normal load had less influence on
the specific wear rate than changes to the level of water contamination. The main reason
for the specific wear rate increase is the complex three-body wear mechanism, including
abrasive and adhesive wear.
111
The main purpose of these wear tests was to analyse the performance of samples of NF22
(Railko) bearing material in highly abrasive operational conditions, when forced against an
AISI 440C stainless steel.
This resultant knowledge provides a base for further investigation into a three-body wear
mechanism under contaminated water conditions. This could lead to the development of a
more advanced three-body nonlinear wear model for water-lubricated bearings and other
engineering applications.
8.4 Conclusions
The effect of contaminated water lubrication on the wear mechanism of the pair of
materials comprising NF22 (Railko) composite and AISI 440C stainless steel was
experimentally investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn:
1.
Mass loss and the specific wear rate of NF22 (Railko) composite material decreases
as the applied normal load increases. This is due to plastic deformation of the
contacting surfaces.
2.
Wear studies of the composite material NF22 (Railko) against the AISI 440C
stainless steel disk under various normal loads, sliding speeds, and water
contamination show no significant mass loss under clean water lubrication due to
the material properties of the composite.
3.
The mass loss and specific wear rate increase nonlinearly with the increase of water
contamination due to the complex adhesive-abrasive wear mechanism.
4.
For the specific range of applied normal load, sliding speed, and level of water
contamination explored in this experimental study, water contamination has a
stronger effect on the mass loss and specific wear rate than the normal load and
sliding speed. This can be explained by the strong influence of abrasive nature of
the wear mechanism.
5.
the purpose of this test method is to predict the relative ranking of water-lubricated
bearings materials combinations, but not to simulate wear of in service waterlubricated bearings.
Thus, these experimental results represent a basis for further extensive experimental and
theoretical studies of the wear mechanism and the physical implications of a variation in
the material properties of composite materials used for water-lubricated engineering
applications.
The effect of water contamination and magnetic damping on the vibration and its
correlation to wear was experimentally investigated and results are presented and discussed
in the next chapter.
113
Propeller shaft bearing systems on ships and submarines can make use of different types of
water-lubricated systems. A number of selection requirements have been developed and
provided in manufacturers catalogues and design manuals (THORDON, 2006,
WRTSIL, 6/09/2007, Litwin, 2009). These criteria include bearing pressure, sliding
speed, size, type of lubrication, surface finish, lubricant flow, fittings, and machine
tolerances. The essential factors to be considered when designing and selecting waterlubricated bearing materials are possible vibration, noise, power loss, and lifespan. The
manufacturers of most bearings provide detailed life-load analysis where bearing
calculations consider design requirements such as load, lubricant type, and speed of
rotation (sliding speed). According to Chowdhury and Helali (2007), the reduction of wear
and vibration depends on interfacial conditions such as applied load, geometry, relative
surface motion, sliding speed, surface finishes, type of materials, system rigidity,
lubrication, and lubricant contamination (Chowdhury and Helali, 2007). Nevertheless, the
relationships between these main factors (friction, wear, vibration, and contamination) in
water-lubricated bearings are unknown and have generated limited attention in the
literature.
The ASTM G 99-04 Standard test Method for wear testing with a Pin-on Disk apparatus
was used to collect the wear data (ASTM, 2004a).
115
Figure 9.1 shows the POD test rig equipped with a strong magnet mounted on the rig base.
The magnet is independent from the sliding load cell containing the pin. The magnet was
positioned within a millimetre of the load cell for the investigation of the vibrationwear
relationship under damped conditions.
An experimental study of the effect of water contamination and damping on the vibration
wear relationship was conducted to examine the effect of varying contaminated water
lubrication regimes and damped and undamped conditions on mass loss, specific wear rate,
and the frequency characteristics of the induced vibrations of water lubricated bearings
materials.
116
Identify the effect of damping on the wear mechanism under water - lubricated
damped and undamped conditions.
The technical parameters adopted for the experimental study, including specific test
conditions and experimental samples, are shown in Table 9.1.
Parameters
Experimental Rig
8N
Lubrication conditions
Water-lubricated damped
Water-lubricated undamped
Water contamination
0%
0.5%
1%
2%
Sliding speeds:
Boundary regime
Mixed regime
0.393 m/s
1.557 m/s
Calibration coefficient
9.0 N/volt
Test duration
2 hours
Disk diameter
0.3 m
Pin diameter
0.01 m
53-106 m
Materials:
Disk
Pin
This experimental work was conducted at room temperature. The preparation procedure
included polishing the surfaces of the pin and the disk using various grades of wet and dry
silicon carbide paper down to 1200 grit.
117
Two sets of tests were conducted under both: damped and undamped conditions. The
duration of each test was one hour for vibration-wear data acquisition. Prior to the
commencement of the tests, the POD test rig was run for an hour before taking any
measurements. This was done to ensure that there was full contact between the pin and the
disk surfaces. During all vibration and wear tests, the vibration parallel to the sliding
direction was measured and the friction-induced vibration voltage output signal from the
bending arm strain gauges was recorded using a USB-1408FS data acquisition device.
For the first run of experiments, a constant sliding speed of 0.393 m/s (boundary regime)
and a load of 8 N under clean water lubrication in undamped conditions were used. During
the test, a friction-induced vibration voltage output signal from the bending arm strain
gauges was recorded at a sampling rate of 0.01 sec/sample. Before and after each run, the
mass of the pin was measured and the mass loss calculated and recorded. At the same
sliding speed, clay free sand was introduced as the contaminant. The friction-induced
vibration voltage output signal and mass losses were measured and recorded, and the
friction force, Welch power spectrum densities, and specific wear rates were calculated and
analysed. This procedure was repeated for a sliding speed of 1.557 m/s (mixed regime).
The experimental runs were repeated three times at each condition and the average value
for the three runs was recorded for each data point.
To investigate the effect of damping on vibration and wear, the same set of experiments
was conducted using a damping magnet. Since it is generally known that the specific wear
rate depends on multiple variables such as load, sliding distance, sliding speed, property of
materials, and type of lubrication and contamination, the purpose of these two sets of
experiments was to collect data for further analysis of the effect of water lubrication, water
contamination, and damping on the vibrationwear relationship.
At sliding speeds of 0.393 m/s and 1.557 m/s the two different lubrication regimes
(boundary and mixed) were characterised by the behaviour of the friction force versus
time, the nature of pin surfaces as examined under the scanning electron microscope, and
the specific wear rate measured as mass loss per unit of sliding distance. The effect of
increasing water contamination and damping on the lubrication regimes was also
characterised.
118
119
Under clean water lubrication (see Figure 9.2 a), the process of friction can be described by
an adhesive mechanism of interaction under the boundary lubrication regime (Aronov et
al., 1983). As the water contamination is increased above a certain critical value, which in
this case is 0.5 %, a transition occurs from an adhesive to an adhesive-abrasive friction
process. This is characterised by the appearance of higher-amplitude unstable lowfrequency vibration shown in Figure 9.2 b), c), d). These unstable low-frequency
vibrations, due to the solid silica particles, are responsible for the formation of the threebody abrasive interaction coupled with an adhesive mechanism of friction. The typical
average friction force value does not change significantly and is within the range of 2-3 N.
At the same time, damping significantly decreases the amplitude of vibrations. The
maximum vibration suppression was observed with clean water lubrication and a 0.393 m/s
sliding speed. This was explained in the literature by disabling of adhesive wear
mechanism by damping of the amplitude of vibration (Maru et al., 2007a, Maru et al.,
2007b).
Figure 9.3 shows typical damped and undamped calculated friction forcetime graphs for
the NF22 (Railko) material in clean and various levels of contaminated water lubrication.
In this case the tests were conducted at a sliding speed of 1.557 m/s conditions, under an 8
N load and under 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% water contamination, respectively. The
measurements were obtained at the final stage of the 60-minute duration test.
122
123
124
The friction can be described by the adhesive mechanism of interaction in the mixed
(transition) lubrication regime (Aronov et al., 1983), when clean water lubrication is used
(as shown in Figure 9.3 a). Comparing these results with those for the low sliding speed of
0.393 m/s results (shown in Figure 9.2 a), the reduction of vibration is due to a mixed
lubrication regime when a lubricant film is formed and resulting in reduced adhesive
interaction. When 0.5 % contamination was introduced, the complex three-body
mechanism of friction begins to play a significant role and an increased amplitude of
vibration was observed (Litwin, 2009, Meuter, 2006). A transition occurs from an adhesive
to an abrasive friction process, characterised by the appearance of high-amplitude unstable
low-frequency vibrations as seen in Figure 9.3 b), c), d) when the water contamination was
increased above a critical value of 1.0%. A similar effect was described my Maru et al.
(2007a) and (2007b). Similar to the low sliding speed, these unstable low-frequency
vibrations appear result of the solid silica particles producing for a three-body interaction
coupled with a mixed regime of lubrication. As the highest sliding speed is in the mixed
lubrication regime, the typical average friction force was lower compared to the low
sliding speed results and was within the range of 1-2 N. At the same time, damping
significantly decreased the amplitude of vibrations. The maximum vibration suppression
was observed for clean water-lubrication. This again can be explained by the disabling of
the adhesive wear mechanism by the damping of the amplitude of vibration as reported in
Maru et al. (2007a) and (2007b).
125
Welch power spectral density analyses were conducted to establish the conditions for lowfrequency vibration generation. The effects of undamped and damped conditions, water
lubrication and contamination, sliding speeds, and friction forcetime histories were
analysed.
Figure 9.4 presents the Welch power spectral density values data for NF22 (Railko) for
clean and contaminated water lubrication under an 8 N load, at a 0.393 m/s sliding speed,
and at 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% water contamination, respectively, with and without
damping. The measurements were taken during the final stage of a 60-minute duration test.
126
127
Figure 9.4 Welch power spectral densities for damped and undamped conditions
under load 8 N and 0.393 m/s, sliding speed
Figure 9.4 presents the boundary regime of lubrication with different levels of
contamination. It is clearly seen that damping reduces the dominant resonance frequency
128
of the system, typically in the 12-14 Hz frequency band. As the water contamination is
increased above a certain critical value, which in this case is 0.5%, the suppression of
resonance frequencies becomes more difficult. As mentioned above, transition occurs from
an adhesive to an adhesive-abrasive friction process, characterised by the appearance of
high-amplitude unstable low-frequency vibrations (Figure 9.4 b), c), d)). These unstable
low-frequency vibrations appear as soon as the solid silica particles become responsible for
the formation of the three-body interaction coupled with the adhesive friction mechanism.
As a result of the contamination, the intensity of vibration was increased by approximately
20 db/Hz. This type of vibration (low frequency and high intensity) at a low sliding speed
was generated due to the boundary regime of lubrication (Bhushan, 1980).
Figure 9.5 presents the Welch power spectral density values data for NF22 (Railko) with
clean and contaminated water lubrication under an 8 N load, at 1.557 m/s sliding speed and
at 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% water contamination, respectively, with and without damping.
129
130
Figure 9.5 represents the Welch power spectral densities in a mixed regime of lubrication
with different levels of contamination. It is clearly seen that damping significantly reduces
the dominant resonance frequencies of the system as well as self-induced low-frequency
131
Overall, the level of power increases with increasing contamination due to the active
abrasive three-body interaction in undamped conditions. According to Torrance (2005) and
Younes (1993), the introduction of damping significantly decreases the intensity of
vibrations with a similar tendency of the power spectral densities to increase with
increasing water contamination (Torrance, 2005, Younes, 1993).
As seen from the results, low-frequency vibrations (up to 15 Hz) play the most significant
role in the vibrationwear relationship under these experimental conditions. No highfrequency vibrations were recorded during this set of experiments.
9.1:
(9.1)
where:
xn is a value of friction force recorded at a rate of 0.01 samples/sec;
n is the number of recorded samples.
According to previous results of calculated friction force time data and Welch power
spectral densities analysis, the low frequency (LF) band is much more sensitive to the
132
Table 9.2 presents the RMS calculated values for NF22 (Railko) in water-lubricated
conditions (clean and contaminated water lubrication), under an 8 N load, at 0.393 m/s and
1.557 m/s sliding speeds, and at 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% water contamination, respectively,
with and without damping.
Table 9.2 Calculated RMS acceleration values at different sliding speeds, lubrication,
and contamination conditions, under an 8 N load
Sliding speed,
m/s
Undamped
Damped
Difference
in RMS,
%
0.393
2.85443
1.562226
45.0
1.557
1.187191
0.748596
36.9
0.393
7.927545
4.666254
41.1
1.557
3.31157
1.445673
56.3
0.393
6.258963
3.179442
49.2
1.557
4.55773
2.067589
54.6
0.393
2.657814
2.168903
18.4
1.557
3.142426
1.927
38.7
0.5
Comparing the values of the RMS differences (RMS, %) between undamped and damped
conditions, it is seen that under a high level of water contamination (2%) the effect of
damping is much lower for both sliding speeds. At the same time, with an increasing
sliding speed, the RMS values reach a maximum at 0.5% contamination for a low sliding
speed and at 1% contamination at a high sliding speed. This is due to both adhesive and
abrasive wear mechanisms, which are in turn due to the transition from a boundary to a
mixed regime.
133
Figure 9.6 illustrates the final experimental RMS values for NF22 (Railko) against the
stainless steel disk with various degrees of water contamination (0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2%,
respectively), under undamped and damped conditions under a load of 8 N.
Figure 9.6 Calculated RMS values for NF22 (Railko) material at normal and damped
load (8 N)
These results show the differences in vibration levels for measured operational conditions,
obtained from tests performed under clean and contaminated lubrication. It can be seen in
Figure 9.6, that vibrations in the overall low-frequency bands are greatly affected by
applied operational conditions, especially by damping (which decreases the vibration for
all levels of contamination and at all sliding speeds), the level of contamination, and
sliding speed. For a low sliding speed, the damping is most effective and the highest value
(peak) of the RMS was recorded for 0.5% water contamination. With an increasing sliding
speed, the peak of vibration (RMS) decreased and also moved to the 1% water
contamination point. This is due to the transition from a boundary to a mixed regime (more
lubricant appears between interacting surfaces). It can be seen that vibrations in lowfrequency bands are greatly affected by operational conditions, especially by sliding speed
(a regime of lubrication), which is in strong agreement with results from the literature
(Maru et al., 2007a, Maru et al., 2007b, Maru et al., 2005). Figure 9.6 also shows that
134
Some of the main observations are highlighted below. As it was discussed by Maru et al.
(2007), the same trend is observed in all operational conditions in which the vibration level
increases with an increase of contaminant concentration and then decreases for higher
concentrations up to the limit value (Maru et al., 2007a). Another observation concerning
the graph (see Figure 8.6) is related to the comparison between levels of contamination. It
is seen that an increase in vibration is seen at low contamination levels. This shows a
significant change in the dynamic behaviour of the pin-disk system which is connected to
the dependency of the vibrationwear relationship on contamination. It is recommended
that these observations be investigated further.
For wear results, no measurable mass losses were recorded during tests under clean waterlubricated conditions. In the case of clean water lubrication, only the adhesive wear
mechanism is possible, which is significantly affected by the type of material and lubricant
used. This is due to the specific material properties of the NF22 (Railko) composite which
contains a solid lubricant in its structure.
Table 9.3 presents the average mass loss values for NF22 (Railko) under water-lubricated
conditions, at 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% water contamination, under an 8 N load and at
sliding speeds of 0.393 m/s and 1.557 m/s, respectively, with and without damping.
135
Table 9.3 Average mass loss (g) at different sliding speeds, lubrication, and
contamination conditions, under an 8 N load
Contamination,
%
Sliding speed,
m/s
Undamped
Damped
Difference
in W, %
0.393
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
1.557
0.0005
0.0000
0.00
0.393
0.0043
0.0004
-3
1.557
0.0061
0.0105
+42
0.393
0.0064
0.0048
-33
1.557
0.0097
0.0216
+45
0.393
0.0118
0.0054
-55
1.557
0.0177
0.0334
+53
0.5
Water
1
Comparing the values of mass loss (W, %) between undamped and damped conditions, it
is seen that at a low sliding speed, the damping leads to a mass loss reduction due to the
boundary regime of lubrication. At a high sliding speed, the value of mass loss increases
due to a more aggressive abrasive wear mechanism coupled with the mixed regime of
lubrication. It is also seen from Table 9.3 that the value of mass loss increases accordingly
with increased water contamination.
Figure 9.7 presents the final experimental results of calculated specific wear rates of NF22
(Railko) against the stainless steel disk under water-lubricated conditions at various
degrees of water contamination (0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2%), respectively.
136
Figure 9.7 Specific wear rate for NF22 (Railko) material for undamped and damped
conditions
The results show two different vibrationwear relationship trends exist: one for low
(boundary lubrication), and one for high (mixed lubrication) sliding speeds for the
conditions used.
The adhesive wear mechanism plays the major role for the low speed range (boundary
regime) when zero or very little lubricant film is presented between the interacting
surfaces, even if it is coupled with abrasive wear. The reduction of vibration by damping
does not allow sand particles to move between the sliding surfaces and make a strong
three-body contact. This leads to a decrease of surface three-body interaction and, as a
consequence, the specific wear rate decreases.
At high speed (mixed lubrication), there is mostly an abrasive wear mechanism due to
lubricant being forced between the interacting bodies. This allows more sand particles to
be drawn into the contact area. Damping reduces vibration, but maintains a stable gap
between the pin and the disk which allows contaminated lubricant to be more aggressive
(Maru et al., 2007a).
137
In spite of much lower mass loss and insignificant differences in surface damage between
undamped and damped conditions, the maximum increase in the specific wear rate was
obtained at the slowest sliding speed (0.393 m/s) in undamped conditions. The clearest
pictures of significant difference in the pins surface damage were found at the high-speed
range. The microscopy of the pin surface under undamped and damped conditions at a high
sliding speed (1.557 m/s) after a full cycle of experiments is shown in Figure 9.8.
a)
138
Figure 9.8 Microscopy of the pins worn surface before and after a full cycle of
experiments at a high sliding speed of 1.557 m/s, at a magnification of X30
to additional forces that strongly depend on the size and material properties of the
contaminants (Olsson et al., 1997).
9.4 Conclusions
In this chapter, water-lubricated bearings materials were experimentally investigated in
order to study the effect of water contamination on vibration and the correlation of
vibration to wear. The methods of vibration analysis (Welch power spectral analysis and
RMS versus specific wear rate) were effective in characterising the trends in the vibration
wear relationship due to water contamination.
Comparing the results for undamped and damped conditions, it can be seen that damping
can reduce vibration and wear due to adhesive wear at the lower range of sliding speeds,
which represents the boundary lubrication regime. At the same time, it is apparent that due
to the mixed lubrication regime, mass loss and specific wear rate increase by adding
damping at the higher range of speeds. The vibrations are suppressed by damping; sand
particles are free to move into the contact area between the pin and the disk due to the
influence of abrasive wear, sliding speed, and the formation of a lubrication film between
the interacting surfaces.
It is expected that, with a change of particle size, the character of the vibrationwear
relationship could be changed significantly due to the prevailing nature of wear
mechanisms. The results obtained can be used for further investigation into the effect of
damping, water contamination, and the type of contaminant on the vibrationwear
relationship. Further theoretical and experimental work and a theoretical three-body
vibrationwear model for simulation of the vibrationwear relationship under damping and
water contamination for stability analysis and design can be undertaken based on the
results presented here. The task of obtaining a theoretical three-body vibrationwear model
for this type of contact is difficult due to the complexity of this mechanism, which includes
140
abrasive wear as well as adhesive wear. This task can be the centrepiece for a future
theoretical study.
As mentioned above, the specific wear rate in water-lubricated sliding bodies depends on
the vibrationwear relationship due to asperities contact, vibration, and abrasive
interaction between contacting bodies and the contaminant. As seen from the results, the
vibrationwear relationship due to undamped or damped conditions and water
contamination is a nonlinear function of the degree of contamination. The character of this
function is still not known, nor is it known how it can be numerically depicted. The present
methodology can be adopted for further experimental and theoretical investigations which
need to be undertaken to identify the complex vibrationwear relationship for different
types of materials, contaminants, and operational conditions.
It is well known that the vibrationwear process involves fracture, tribochemical effects,
and plastic deformation. Transitions between regions dominated by each of these
commonly give rise to changes in the vibrationwear relationship with undamped or
damped conditions and contamination (Song, 2008). Furthermore, these results are closely
related to structural characteristics and chemical effects occurring in frictional processes,
as well as transfer film formation on the counterface as described in the literature (Unal et
al., 2004, Maru et al., 2007b, Bryant and York, 2000, Ling Wu et al., 2010, Maru et al.,
2007a, Krishna Kumar and Swarnamani, 1997, Chowdhury and Helali, 2007). For the
NF22 (Railko) material tested in this experimental investigation and for sliding speeds of
0.393 m/s and 1.557 m/s, the sliding speed and load values as well as contamination have
shown significant influence on the vibrationwear relationship. They represent a complex
function of all of these variables. Friction-induced vibrations have been found to be a
function of sliding speed, operational (undamped or damped) conditions, and load. They
are produced by a complex mechanism of adhesive-abrasive wear at the bearing interfaces.
According to Krishna Kumar and Swarnamani (1997), this is due to the failure of
lubrication and other wear modes that can be considered to be dependent on the nature of
the surfaces and their physical properties (Krishna Kumar and Swarnamani, 1997). Those
physical properties can include surface roughness, hardness, and elastic modulus.
The main purpose of this vibrationwear experimental study was to analyse the influence
of vibration damping and water contamination on the vibrationwear relationship for NF22
141
(Railko) bearing material in low and highly-abrasive conditions against a stainless steel
counterface material.
1.
Specific wear rate of NF22 (Railko) composite material decreases when damping is
applied at a low sliding speed during a boundary lubrication regime.
2.
Specific wear rate of NF22 (Railko) composite material increases when damping is
applied at a high sliding speed during a mixed lubrication regime.
3.
4.
Vibration increases and then decreases and specific wear rate increases with greater
water contamination. The highest value of RMS for the low sliding speed was
recorded at 0.5% contamination and for the high sliding speed at 1% water
contamination.
5.
For the specific applied load of 8 N, at low and high sliding speeds, and with the
water contamination explored in this experimental study, damping had a stronger
effect on specific wear rate. It is a function of sliding speed and a result of the
change in lubrication regime between selected sliding speeds.
142
6.
7.
Thus, the POD experimental methodology and the results presented can be used for further
extensive experimental and theoretical studies of the vibrationwear relationship of various
combinations of materials with different material properties used for water-lubricated
engineering applications.
143
CHAPTER 10 Conclusions
A review of the literature showed that the effect of water contamination on waterlubricated bearing materials and systems performance is highly complex. It depends on
many factors such as the chemical reactivity and corrosion characteristics of the materials
to water and any dissolved salts it may contain and the abrasive nature of soil and sands
entrained in the water. Limited attention has been given in the literature in terms of
analysing and predicting the effect of water contamination on tribological characteristics of
materials for the design and modelling of water-lubricated bearings. Previous experimental
studies, conducted at the School of Mechanical Engineering, at the University of Adelaide,
were analysed, and used as a starting point for this research.
To measure the friction coefficient, vibration, and wear due to the effect of water
lubrication and water contamination, the operational conditions and test rig design
requirements were identified, a new experimental approach was developed, and a specific
Pin-on-Disk (POD) experimental test rig was designed and built. This experimental
apparatus enabled the measurement of the local friction coefficient and vibration as well as
wear investigation for the material combinations used in water-lubricated engineering
applications.
Under the initial experimental requirements, the pair of materials chosen was an NF22
(Railko) composite and stainless steel (AISI 440C).
In accordance with the initial requirements and operating conditions, the POD test rig was
built and ordinary tap water was introduced as a lubricant. To model contamination, fine
sweeping sand with a particle sizes range between 53-106 m was chosen as a contaminant
and added to the lubricant.
144
CHAPTER 10 Conclusions
Experimental investigations of friction and wear were conducted under water lubrication
with a contamination range of 0% to 6% by weight for an applied load range of 8 N to 46
N and a sliding speed range from 0.393 m/s to 1.557 m/s.
An analysis of friction, vibration, and wear test experimental results was conducted and
showed the significant effect of water contamination and damping on the friction
coefficient, vibration, wear, and calculated specific wear rate. It was found that there was a
significant increase in the friction coefficient, vibration, and specific wear rate at the
slowest sliding speed of 0.393 m/s. This is due to the boundary regime of lubrication, the
adhesive-abrasive wear mechanism, and specific material properties of NF22 (Railko)
material. At the same time, wear can be decreased by the damping of vibration at slow
sliding speeds.
The microscopy analysis of the pins surface was undertaken before and after wear
experiments and confirmed that wear resistance can be significantly improved by adding
organic fibres and solid lubricant to composite bearing materials. Two components of
complex wear mechanisms (adhesive and abrasive) were considered and analysed. It was
shown that material mass loss and specific wear rate depend mostly on abrasive wear.
As mentioned above, boundary and mixed regimes are the reasons for many tribological
problems such as vibration, power loss, and excessive wear. The simulation of friction in
boundary and mixed regimes is difficult due to their strong and complex interdependency.
To acquire an adequate prediction of material performance, for water-lubricated
applications, friction, vibration, and wear, and theoretical models in the boundary and
mixed lubrication regimes are still required and could be the next stage of further waterlubricated bearing modelling development. As a result of the analysis presented here, it is
suggested that additional components responsible for water contamination and damping
should be added to existing theoretical friction models. The three-body wear model can be
modified, based on the results obtained, as a response to the abrasive nature of water
145
CHAPTER 10 Conclusions
contamination. In addition, this new POD experimental approach can be used during
development and selection of new materials for water-lubricated bearings.
146
CHAPTER 10 Conclusions
10.2 Conclusions
In this experimental study, the effect of water contamination on the friction behaviour of a
pair of materials comprising a composite and stainless steel was experimentally
investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn from the results regarding the
friction coefficient, vibration, and wear for water-lubricated bearings materials:
Limited attention has been given in the literature to the effect of water
contamination on friction, vibration, and wear in water-lubricated bearings
materials and systems.
The friction coefficient of NF22 (Railko) composite material against AISI 440C
stainless steel decreases, when the load and sliding speed are increased under clean
water lubrication. This is a result of boundary and mixed regimes of lubrication and
the elastic and plastic deformation between the surfaces.
No mass loss was observed under both dry friction and clean water lubrication for a
composite material (NF22 [Railko]) against an AISI 440C stainless steel disk under
constant load, undamped and damped conditions, and low and high sliding speeds.
Mass loss and specific wear rate increase nonlinearly with an increase in the water
contamination level. In this experimental work, a simple empirical linear model of
contact mechanics, based on experimental results, has been offered for the range of
1% to 6% levels of water contamination as a first iteration.
For the specific range of loads and sliding speeds investigated in this experimental
study, load has a stronger effect than sliding speed on the friction, vibration, and
wear behaviour of composite material.
147
CHAPTER 10 Conclusions
Under a boundary lubrication regime, the specific wear rate of NF22 (Railko)
composite material decreases when damping is applied at a low sliding speed.
Under a mixed lubrication regime, the specific wear rate of NF22 (Railko)
composite material increases when damping is applied at a high sliding speed.
For the vibrationwear relationship, it was found that the greatest value of RMS for
a low sliding speed was recorded at 0.5% water contamination and for a 1.557 m/s
sliding speed at 1% water contamination on account of the transition from a
boundary to a mixed lubrication regime.
For the specific applied load of 8 N, the low and high sliding speeds, and the water
contamination explored in this experimental study, damping has a stronger effect on
the vibrationwear relationship which depends on sliding speed and, as a result, on
the lubrication regime.
However, the analysis, the experimental results, and the experimental approach
presented here can be used for further extensive experimental and theoretical
studies for design simulation, and for the further development of a theoretical
model for the adequate prediction of the physical implications of a variation in the
operational conditions, material properties, and technical requirements of material
combinations used for water-lubricated engineering applications.
148
CHAPTER 10 Conclusions
A new theoretical three-body model of friction, vibration, and wear using contact
mechanics is necessary for the analysis and design of water-lubricated bearings
under water contamination. It is still not known if any nonlinearity is due to the
effect of water contamination.
Proper material selection for experimental work. For example, all materials need to
be either properly analysed and/or all material property specifications should be
available in detail or determined.
149
References
REFERENCES
AIPHAISS. 2009. Tribometers, Standard Tribometers (TRB). Alpha Instrument Supplies
and Servises Sdn BhD (AIphaISS). Available:
http://www.alphaiss.com.my/surface.html.
ANDREAUS, U. & CASINI, P. 2001. Forced Motion of Friction Oscillators Limited by a
Rigid or Deformable Obstacle. Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 29,
177-198.
ARONOV, V., D'SOUZA, A. F., KALPAKJIAN, S. & SHAREEF, I. 1983. Experimental
Investigation of the Effect of System Rigidity on Wear and Friction-Induced
Vibrations. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 105, 206-211.
ASTM 2003. E 4 03: Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines.
ASTM International.
ASTM 2004a. G 99 04: Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk
Apparatus. ASTM International.
ASTM 2004b. G 115 04: Standard Guide for Measuring and Reporting Friction
Coefficients. ASTM International.
ASTM 2006. E 74 06: Standard Practice of Calibration of Force-Measuring Instruments
for Verifying the Force Indication of Testing Machines. ASTM International.
ASTM G 99 04. Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus.
ASTM International.
BARWELL, F. T. 1984. Advances in friction and wear mechanisms. Tribology
International.
BAYER, R. G. 2002. Wear Analysis for Engineers, New York, HNB Publishing.
BHATTACHARJEE, R. 2013. Free Vibration of a Cantilever Beam (Continuous System)
BHUSHAN, B. 1980. Stick-Slip Induced Noise Generation in Water-Lubricated Compliant
Rubber Bearings. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 102, 201-211
BISWELL, T. 2007. Bearings for longer shaft life. WRTSIL Technical Journal.
BRYANT, M. D. & YORK, D. 2000. Measurements and Correlations of Slider Vibrations
and Wear. Journal of Tribology, 122, 374-380.
CHOWDHURY, M. A. & HELALI, M. M. 2007. The effect of frequency of vibration and
humidity on the wear rate. Wear, 262, 198-203.
CHOWDHURY, M. A. & HELALI, M. M. 2009. The wear behavior of mild steel under
vertical vibration. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 61.
150
References
References
HOLINSKI, R. 2001. Fundamentals of dry friction and some practical examples. Industrial
Lubrication and Tribology, 53, 61-65.
HORI, Y. 2006. "Friction, Wear, and Lubrication", Hydrodynamic Lubrication, Tokyo,
Springer-Vedrlag.
IBRAHIM, R. A. 1994a. Friction-induced vibration, chatter, squeal, and chaos. Part 1:
Mechanics of contact and friction. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 47, 209-226.
IBRAHIM, R. A. 1994b. Friction-induced vibration, chatter, squeal, and chaos. Part 2:
Dynamics and modeling. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 47, 227-240.
IVANOV, M. G. & IVANOV, D. M. 2012. Nanodiamond Nanoparticles as Additives to
Lubricants. Ultrananocrystalline Diamond.
JONSON, M. S. 2000. Vibration tests for bearing wear. ASHRAE Journal
KAARSTAD, E. 2009. A Study of Temperature Dependant Friction in Wellbore Fluids.
SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exibition. DC.
KASADRA, M. E. F., MENDOZA, H., KIRK, R. G. & WICK, A. 2004. Reduction of
subsynchronous vibrations in a single-disk rotor using an active magnetic damper.
Mechanical Research Communications, 31, 689-695.
KASARDA, M. E. F. 2004. Reduction of subsynchronous vibrations in a single-disk rotor
using an active magnetic damper. Mechanics Research Communications, 11.
KATO, K., IWABUCHI, A. & KAYABA, T. 1982. The effect of friction-induced
vibration on friction and wear. Wear, 80, 307-320.
KHARAGPUR, I. Brief overview of bearings. Module 14. Version 2 ME ed.
KINGSBURY, I. 1997. A General Guide to the Principles, Operation and Troubleshooting
of Hydrodynamic Bearings. Philadelphia.
KOTOUSOV, A. 2009. Aft Bearing Study Engineering Report (Final). Adelaide:
University of Adelaide.
KRIM, J. 2002. Surface science and the atomic-scale origins of friction: what once was old
is new again. Surface Science, 500, 741-758.
KRISHNA KUMAR, V. & SWARNAMANI, S. 1997. Vibration monitoring in sliding
wear of plasma sprayed ceramics. Wear, 210, 255-262.
LEDOCQ, J. H. M. 1973. A Test Rig for Journal Bearings results with polymer bushes
Wear, 133-142.
LIANG, H. 2005. "Friction", Tribology in Chemical-Mechanical Planarization.
LING WU, LING-FENG HE, JI-XIN CHEN, XIN-PO LU & ZHOU, Y.-C. 2010.
Reciprocating Friction and Wear Behaviour of Zr2[Al(Si)]4C5-SiC Composite
Against Si3N4 Ball. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 93.
152
References
References
References
155
References
References
157
158
159
160