INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:

MFO
s
Basic
Educati
on
Service
s

KRAs

1.
Pedagogic
al and
learning
acquisition
processes

Evanessa Z. Villacrusis
Teacher 1
June 1 to April 1
WEIGH
T

35%

TIMELI
NE

June
1 to
April
1

OBJECTIVES

1.1 Prepared
lesson plan in
every learning
session

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Performance Indicators

WEIG
HT

15%

ACTU
AL
RESUL
T

Quality

Efficiency

The LP will have

the following
indicators as to
measure its
quality:
competency from
CG
SMART objectives
effective
strategies
evaluation (may
be in a form of
activity)

The LP must attain

the following
indicators
to verify its efficiency:
competency was
manifested in the
activities
written in the LP
objectives are
SMART
strategies includes
eliciting responses
and
do not incline to plain
Socratic Methods
at least 75%
mastery level is
attained

5- Met all the

indicators.
4- Lack 1 indicator
3- Lack 2
indicators.
2- Lack 3
indicators
1- Lack more than
3 indicators.

5-Met all indicators

4 - lacked 1 indicator
3 - lacked 2 indicators
2 - lacked 3 indicators
1 - indicators are not
manifested

Timeliness
5- Submit lesson
plan as requested
4-failed to submit
lesson plan 1-2
times
3-failed to submit
lesson plan 3-4
times
2-failed to submit
lesson plan 5-6
times
1-failed to submit
lesson plan more
than 6 times

RATIN
G

Q E T Q E T

A
V
E

S
C
O
R
E

1.2Maintained
85% attendance
of students.

Bureau/Center/Service /Division:

5 - 85 % attendance
5 - submission of
every month is met
FORM 2 is always
4- only 70 %
on time
attendance
4 - often on time
3- only 65%
3 - sometimes on
attendance
time
2 - only 60%
2 - seldom on time
attendance
1 - never on time
1- less than 60%
attendance
Bacong National High School, Schools Division of Zamboanga del Norte, Department of Education
1.3 Implemented
school rules,
policies and
guidelines in the
classroom.

10%

10%

5- No dropout
4- Has 1 to 5
dropouts
3- Has 6 to 10
dropouts
2 - Has 10 to 15
dropouts
1- Has more than
15 dropouts.

The teacher must

(1) establish, (2)
implement, (3)
promote and (4)
model the positive
responses
towards the
established rules,
policies
and guidelines in
the classroom
5- Met all the
indicators.
4- Lack 1 indicator
3- Lack 2
indicators.
2- Lack 3
indicators
1- lack all four
indicators

2.
Outcomes
of

35%

June
1 to
April

2.1 Monitored
and evaluated
students'

15%

The following are

the indicators as
to

5- No record of
student's
misbehavior.
4- Has less than 5
records of student's
misbehavior.
3- Has 5-10 records of
student's
misbehavior.
2- Has 15-20 records
of student's
misbehavior.
1- Has more than 20
records of students
misbehavior.

5 - always
systematically
reprimand students
4 - often
systematically
reprimand students
3 - sometimes
systematically
reprimand students
2 - seldom
systematically
reprimand students
1 - never
systematically
reprimand students

5 - at least 75% of the

class achieve passing
scores every quarter

5-always submitted
quarterly test, TOS,
MPS, Grading

Student's
endeavors

progress.

measure the
quality of the
objective:
Constructed valid
and reliable
summative and
quarterly test with
TOS.
Computed MPS in
all subjects taught
and submitted to
the principal
Used Rubrics in
rating all
performance tasks
Submitted Test
Papers and TOS
the principal
Submitted
Grading Sheets

4- only 70 % passed
3- only 65% passed
2 - only 60% passed
1- less than 60%
passed

sheets.
4-often submitted
quarterly test, TOS,
MPS, Grading
sheets.
3-sometimes
submitted quarterly
test, TOS, MPS,
Grading sheets.
2-seldom submitted
quarterly test, TOS,
MPS, Grading
sheets.
1-never submitted
quarterly test, TOS,
MPS, Grading
sheets.

Tracked students'
rating
Offered remediation
to all challenged
learner as needed.
Offered remediation

Updating and
tracking was done
as required:

5- Met all the

indicators.
4- Lack 1 indicator
3- Lack 2
indicators.
2- Lack 3
indicators
1- Lack more than
3 indicators.

2.2Maintained
updated
students'
records.

10%

Class Records
reflected the bases
of ratings in all
classes handled.
Form 138 is
updated and

5- Always
4-Often

checked quarterly
Form 137 is
updated and
checked quarterly
Grading sheets
are submitted to
the advisers of the
class being held
5- Meet all
indicators
4-Lacked 1
indicator
3-Lacked 2
indicators
4- Lacked 3
indicators
5- Did not met all
the indicators

2.3 Achieved an
increase in MPS
in all subjects
taught in every
grading period
using the first
grading period as
its baseline

10%

5 3% and above
of MPS was
increased than the
set percentage.
4 3% - 4% of
MPS was increased
than the set
percentage.
3 1% - 2% of
MPS was increased
the set
percentage.
2 No increased of
MPS.
1 1% and more
of MPS was
decreased.

to all challenged
learner once a week
Made a separate
lesson Plan

3-Sometimes
4- Seldom
5- Never

5- Meet all indicators

4-Lacked 1 indicator
3-Lacked 2 indicators
4- Lacked 3 indicators
5- Did not met all the
indicators

5 100-75% of the
learners passed the
quarterly exam
4 - 74-60% of the
students passed the
quarterly exam
3 - 59-40% of the
students passed the
quarterly exam
2 - 39 - 20 % of the
students passed the
exam
1 - none passed the
exam

5 All MPS per

subject were
submitted 3 days
before the deadline
4 - Submitted 2 day
before the deadline
3- All subjects were
submitted during
the required date of
submission.
2- Submitted 2 -3
days late during
the required date of
submission.
1- Submitted 4 - 5
days late during
the required date of

submission.

3.Personal
,
Social
and
Profession
al
Developme
nt

30%

June
1 to
April
1

3.1 Observed
punctuality in
class attendance
and in other
occasions and in
accomplishing
tasks and
submission of
required reports.

10%

The submitted
report is accurate
and
responds to what
is needed
The submitted
report is timely
The submitted
report is presented
professionally
always punctual
in all
activity/occasion
5- Meet all
indicators
4-Lacked 1
indicator
3-Lacked 2
indicators
4- Lacked 3
indicators
5- Did not met all
the indicators

3.2
Demonstrated
appropriate
behavior in
dealing with
superiors, coteachers,
students and
stakeholders.

10%

Abided by and
implemented
school rules,
policies and
procedures.
Abided by the
code of Ethics for
Professional
teachers.

5 Never been
absent in class or any
occasion or fail to
submit reports unless
with valid reasons
4 Seldom absent in
class or any occasion
or fail to submit
reports.
3 Sometimes absent
in class or any
occasion or fail to
submit reports
2 Often absent in
class or any occasion
or fail to submit
reports
1 Always absent in
class or any occasion
or fail to submit
reports

5 - Arrived at
school ahead of
official time and
submitted reports I
day before
deadline.
4 - Arrived at
school on time and
submitted required
reports on
deadline.
3- Arrived at school
on time and
submitted reports
after the deadline.
2- Arrived at school
late less than 10
times and
submitted reports
late.
1- Arrived at school
late more than 10
times and
submitted reports
late.

5 100%-95%
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, co-teachers,
students and
stakeholders
4 - 94%-85%
maintained

5 Always
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, coteachers, students
and stakeholders
4 Often
maintained

Maintained
stature and
behavior that
upholds the
dignity of
teaching.
Related/ dealt
well with superior,
co teachers,
parents and
stakeholders.
5 - Met all
indicators
4 - lacked 1
indicator
3 - lacked 2
indicators
2 - lacked 3
indicators
1 - lacked 4
indicators

3.3 Participated /
attended
seminar/ inservice Training
or school
competitions
during the rating
period

10%

5 -Attended/
participated at
least 1
national level or 3
regional level
4 -attended/
participated at
least 1
regional level or 3
division level

harmonious
relationship with
superior, co-teachers,
students and
stakeholders
3 - 84%-75%
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, co-teachers,
students and
stakeholders
2 74%-60%
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, co-teachers,
students and
stakeholders
1 less than 60%
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, co-teachers,
students and
stakeholders

harmonious
relationship with
superior, coteachers, students
and stakeholders
3 Sometimes
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, coteachers, students
and stakeholders
2 Seldom
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, coteachers, students
and stakeholders
1 Never
maintained
harmonious
relationship with
superior, coteachers, students
and stakeholders

5 - Has been
recognized in National
Level
competitions
4 - Has been
recognized in
Regional Level
competitions
3 - Has been
recognized in Division

5 - Attended all
required seminars
and
competition
4 - Often attended
all required
seminars
and competitions
3 - Sometimes
attended all

3 - Attended/
participated at
least 1 div. level 2
schools or district
level.
2 - Attended/
participated at
least 1 district or
school level
1 - No seminar
attended.

Level
competitions
2 - Has been
recognized in
Congressional
Level competitions
1- Has been
recognized in School
Level competitions

required seminars
and competitions
2 - Seldom
attended all
required seminars
and competitions
1 - No seminar
attended.

RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT

________________________________
Ratee
Approving Authority

________________________________
Rater

________________________________