Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Exhibit B
Burns Declaration
Page 1 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 2 of 44
Chapter 11
(Jointly Administered)
Avenue of the Americas, Fl. 49, New York, New York 10020.
2.
I am a member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York, and I have
been admitted to practice in New York. There are no disciplinary proceedings against me.
3.
Order Authorizing the Retention and Employment of Bracewell LLP as Attorneys for the Debtors
and Debtors in Possession Effective Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the Application).2
Except as otherwise noted, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein.
The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtors federal tax identification
number, are: Venoco, Inc. (5555); Denver Parent Corporation (1005); TexCal Energy (LP) LLC (0806); Whittier
Pipeline Corporation (1560); TexCal Energy (GP) LLC (0808); Ellwood Pipeline, Inc. (5631); and TexCal Energy
South Texas, L.P. (0812). The Debtors main corporate and mailing address for purposes of these chapter 11 cases
is: Venoco, Inc., 370 17th Street, Suite 3900, Denver, CO 80202-1370.
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Application.
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 3 of 44
Bracewells Qualifications
4.
and extensive experience and knowledge in the field of debtors protections, creditors rights and
business reorganizations under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and in the field of oil and gas
law.
5.
Bracewell is currently and has been actively involved in major chapter 11 cases
and has represented debtors in many cases, including most recently: In re Energy & Exploration
Partners, Inc., No. 15-44931 (Bankr. N. D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2015); In re Optim Energy, LLC, No.
14-10262 (Bankr. D. Del. May 13, 2014); and In re WBH Energy, LP, et al., No. 15-10003
(Bankr. W. D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2015).
6.
since the beginning of 2006 and therefore Bracewell has extensive and unique knowledge and
familiarity with the Debtors business, assets and legal obligations and many of the potential
legal issues that may arise in the context of these chapter 11 cases. Bracewell is both wellqualified and uniquely able to represent the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases in an efficient and
timely manner.
Services to be Rendered
7.
Subject to further order of the Court, and consistent with the Engagement Letter,
the Debtors request the retention and employment of Bracewell to render, specifically but
without limitation, the following legal services:
(i)
advising the Debtors with respect to its powers and duties as debtor in
possession in the continued management and operation of its businesses
and properties;
(ii)
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 4 of 44
(iii)
(iv)
taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the Debtors estates,
including prosecuting actions on the Debtors behalf, defending any action
commenced against the Debtors, and representing the Debtors in
negotiations concerning litigation in which the Debtors are involved,
including objections to claims filed against the Debtors estates;
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
appearing before the Court and any appellate courts to represent the
interests of the Debtors estates;
(ix)
(x)
(xi)
performing all other necessary legal services for the Debtors in connection
with the prosecution of these chapter 11 cases, including: (i) analyzing the
Debtors leases and contracts and the assumption and assignment or
rejection thereof; (ii) analyzing the validity of liens against the Debtors;
and (iii) advising the Debtors on corporate and litigation matters.
Professional Compensation
8.
and reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with these chapter 11 cases, subject to the
Courts approval and in compliance with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Bankruptcy Rules, the Local Rules and any other applicable procedures or orders of the Court.
The hourly rates and corresponding rate structure Bracewell will use in these chapter 11 cases
are the same as the hourly rates and corresponding rate structure that Bracewell uses in other
restructuring matters, as well as similar complex corporate, securities, and litigation matters
3
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 5 of 44
whether in court or otherwise, regardless of whether a fee application is required. These rates
and the rate structure reflect that such restructuring and other complex matters typically are
national in scope and involve great intricacy, high stakes, and severe time pressures.
9.
Bracewell operates in a national marketplace for legal services in which rates are
driven by multiple factors relating to the individual lawyer, his or her area of specialization, the
firms expertise, performance, and reputation, the nature of the work involved, and other factors.
10.
Bracewells hourly rates for matters related to these chapter 11 cases range as
follows:
11.
Billing Category
Range
Partners
$750-1,050
Counsel /
Associates
Paraprofessionals
$385-760
$300 - 310
for providing services to the Debtors: Robert G. Burns ($1,050.00), Robin J. Miles ($975.00);
Mark Dendinger ($685.00) and Rebekah T. Scherr ($455.00). In addition, as necessary, other
Bracewell professionals and paraprofessionals will provide services to the Debtors.3
12.
Bracewells hourly rates are set at a level designed to compensate Bracewell fairly
for the work of its attorneys and paraprofessionals and to cover fixed and routine expenses.
Hourly rates vary with the experience and seniority of the individuals assigned. These hourly
rates are subject to periodic adjustments to reflect economic and other conditions.4
3
Although Bracewell does not anticipate using contract attorneys during these chapter 11 cases, in the unlikely
event that it becomes necessary to use contract attorneys, Bracewell will not charge a markup to the Debtors with
respect to fees billed by such attorneys. Moreover, any contract attorneys or non-attorneys who are employed by
the Debtors in connection with work performed by Bracewell will be subject to conflict checks and disclosures in
accordance with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code.
For example, like many of its peer law firms, Bracewell increases the hourly billing rate of attorneys and
paraprofessionals each year in the form of: (i) step increases historically awarded in the ordinary course on the
basis of advancing seniority and promotion and (ii) periodic increases within each attorneys and
Case 16-10655-KG
13.
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 6 of 44
since the beginning of 2006. Bracewell also represented the Debtors during the three month
period before the Petition Date, using the hourly rates listed above. Moreover, these hourly rates
are consistent with the rates that Bracewell charges other comparable chapter 11 clients.
14.
The Debtors have undertaken certain steps to ensure that the rate structure
provided by Bracewell is appropriate and is not significantly different from (a) the rates that
Bracewell charges for non-bankruptcy representations or (b) the rates of other comparably
skilled professionals.
15.
identifiable, non-overhead expenses incurred in connection with the clients case that would not
have been incurred except for representation of that particular client. It is also Bracewells
policy to charge its clients only the amount actually incurred by Bracewell in connection with
such items.
Bracewell utilizes the services of overtime secretaries. Bracewell will bill the Debtors for
overtime secretarial charges that arise out of business necessity.
In addition, Bracewell
professionals also may charge their overtime meals and overtime transportation to the Debtors
consistent with prepetition practices.
paraprofessionals current level of seniority. Generally, Bracewell adjusts the billing rates of its attorneys on
November of each year. The last increase was November 1, 2015. The next expected increase will be November
1, 2016. As set forth in the Order, Bracewell will provide ten business days notice to the Debtors, the U.S.
Trustee, and any official committee before implementing any periodic increases, and shall file such notice with
the Court.
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 7 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 8 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
21.
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 9 of 44
As of the Petition Date, the Debtors do not owe Bracewell any amounts for legal
services rendered before the Petition Date, although certain expenses and fees may have been
incurred by Bracewell, but not yet applied to Bracewells retainer. Such amounts, if any, would
be less than the balance of Bracewells retainer as of the Petition Date.
22.
Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2016(b), Bracewell has not shared nor agreed to
share (a) any compensation it has received or may receive with another party or person, other
than the partners, associates, and contract attorneys associated with Bracewell or (b) any
compensation another person or party has received or may receive.
Bracewells Disinterestedness
23.
In connection with its proposed retention by the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases,
Bracewell undertook to determine whether it had any conflicts or other relationships that might
cause it not to be disinterested or to hold or represent an interest adverse to the Debtors.
Specifically, Bracewell obtained from the Debtors and their representatives the names of
individuals and entities that may be parties in interest in these chapter 11 cases (the Potential
Parties in Interest) and such parties are listed on Schedule 1 attached hereto. Bracewell has
searched on its electronic database for its connections to the entities listed on Schedule 1
attached hereto. To the extent I have been able to ascertain that Bracewell has been retained
within the last three years to represent any of the Potential Parties in Interest (or their affiliates,
as the case may be) in matters unrelated to these cases, such facts are disclosed on Schedule 2
attached hereto.
24.
Bracewell and certain of its partners and associates may have in the past
represented, may currently represent, and likely in the future will represent, parties in interest in
these chapter 11 cases in connection with matters unrelated (except as otherwise disclosed
herein) to the Debtors and these chapter 11 cases. Bracewell has searched on its electronic
8
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 10 of 44
database for its connection to the entities listed on Schedule 1 attached hereto. The information
listed on Schedule 1 may have changed without our knowledge and may change during the
pendency of these chapter 11 cases. Accordingly, Bracewell will update this Declaration as
necessary and when Bracewell becomes aware of additional material information. The following
is a list of the categories that Bracewell has searched:7
Schedule
1(a)
Category8
Current and Recent Former Entities Affiliated with the Debtors
1(b)
1(c)
Contractual Counterparties
1(d)
Equity Holders
1(e)
Insurers
1(f)
Lenders
1(g)
1(h)
1(i)
1(j)
1(k)
Credit Agreement
1(l)
Professionals
1(m)
1(n)
Significant Vendors
1(o)
Taxing Authorities
Bracewells inclusion of parties in the following schedules is solely to illustrate Bracewells conflict search
process and is not an admission that any party has a valid claim against the Debtors or that any party properly
belongs in the schedules or has a claim or legal relationship to the Debtors of the nature described in the
schedules.
Certain parties may fall under multiple categories. To avoid redundancy and duplication, each vendor typically
appears on one schedule. There is not a separate category for top 30 unsecured creditors, however they are
identified in each separate schedule.
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 11 of 44
1(p)
Telecom Utilities
1(q)
United States Trustee, Judges, and Court Contracts for the District
1(r)
Utilities
1(s)
Regulatory Agencies
1(t)
Litigation Counterparties
1(u)
attorneys and other professionals representing various parties in interest in these cases are
involved.
Moreover, due to the nature and size of its practice, Bracewell has or has had
relationships as counsel, co-counsel or referring counsel with many major law firms in most, if
not all, major cities in the United States, which includes law firms representing creditors or other
parties in interest in these chapter 11 cases. All such relationships are on matters unrelated to
these cases.
26.
Prior to joining Bracewell, certain Bracewell lawyers may have worked at other
law firms, companies, or other employers that are involved or may become involved in these
chapter 11 cases. To the best of my knowledge, such Bracewell lawyers work at these prior
establishments was unrelated to these chapter 11 cases.
27.
meaning of section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, as required by section 327(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code, and does not hold or represent an interest adverse to the Debtors estates and
(b) Bracewell has no connection to the Debtors, their creditors, or other parties in interest, except
as may be disclosed in this Declaration.
10
Case 16-10655-KG
28.
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 12 of 44
searches of the above-listed entities.9 For the avoidance of doubt, Bracewell will not commence
a cause of action in these chapter 11 cases against the parties listed on Schedule 2 that are
specifically identified as current clients of Bracewell unless Bracewell has an applicable waiver
on file or first receives a waiver from such party allowing Bracewell to commence such an
action. To the extent that a waiver does not exist or is not obtained from such client and it is
necessary for the Debtors to commence an action against that client, the Debtors will be
represented in such particular matter by conflicts counsel.10
29.
Of the clients listed on Schedule 2, only Bracewells work for Venoco, Inc., and
its affiliates listed on the schedule represented more than one percent of Bracewells fee receipts
for the twelve-month period ending on March, 2016.
30.
Bracewell was able to locate using its reasonable efforts) reveals, to the best of Bracewells
knowledge, that those Bracewell attorneys and paraprofessionals who previously worked at other
law firms that represented certain potential parties in interest in these chapter 11 cases have not
worked on matters relating to the Debtors restructuring efforts while at Bracewell.
31.
Based on the conflicts search conducted to date and described herein, to the best
of my knowledge, neither I, Bracewell, nor any partner or associate thereof, insofar as I have
9
As referenced in Schedule 2, the term current client means a client to whom time was posted in the last 12
months preceding the Petition Date. As referenced in Schedule 2, the term former client means a client to
whom time was posted between 12 and 36 months preceding the Petition Date. As a general matter, Bracewell
discloses connections with former clients or closed clients for whom time was posted in the last 36 months, but
does not disclose connections if the time was billed more than 36 months before the Petition Date.
10
Contemporaneously with this Application, the Debtors have also filed an application to employ and retain Morris,
Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Morris Nichols) as Bracewells local counsel in connection with these chapter
11 cases. Morris Nichols will handle matters that the Debtors may encounter that cannot be handled appropriately
by Bracewell because of a conflict of interest. It is intended that the services of Morris Nichols shall complement,
and not duplicate, the services to be rendered by Bracewell. Indeed, the Debtors are extremely mindful of the
need to avoid duplication of services and appropriate procedures will be implemented to ensure that there is no
such duplication.
11
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 13 of 44
been able to ascertain, have any connection with the Debtors, their creditors, or any other parties
in interest, their respective attorneys and accountants, the Office of the United States Trustee for
the District of Delaware (the U.S. Trustee), or any person employed in the Office of the U.S.
Trustee, any Bankruptcy Judge currently serving on the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware, except as disclosed or otherwise described herein.
32.
Bracewell will review its files periodically during the pendency of these chapter
11 cases to ensure that no other conflicts or other disqualifying circumstances exist or arise. If
any new relevant facts or relationships are discovered or arise, Bracewell will use reasonable
efforts to identify such further developments and will file promptly a supplemental declaration,
as required by Bankruptcy Rule 2014(a).
33.
Generally, it is Bracewells policy to disclose clients in the capacity that they first
Declaration in one capacity (e.g., a utility), and the client appears in a subsequent conflicts
search in a different capacity (e.g., a vendor), Bracewell does not disclose the same client again
in supplemental declarations, unless the circumstances are such in the latter capacity that
additional disclosure is required.
34.
From time to time, Bracewell may have referred work to other professionals
involved in these chapter 11 cases. Likewise, certain such professionals may have referred work
to Bracewell.
35.
Certain insurance companies pay the legal bills of Bracewells clients. Some of
these insurance companies may be involved in these chapter 11 cases. None of these insurance
companies, however, are Bracewell clients as a result of the fact that they pay legal fees on
behalf of Bracewell clients.
12
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 14 of 44
Specific Disclosures
36.
As specifically set forth below and in the attached exhibits, Bracewell represents
certain of the Debtors creditors or parties in interest in ongoing matters unrelated to the Debtors
and these chapter 11 cases. None of the representations described herein are materially adverse
to the interests of the Debtors estates. Moreover, pursuant to section 327(c) of the Bankruptcy
Code, Bracewell is not disqualified from acting as the Debtors counsel merely because it
represents certain of the Debtors creditor or other parties in interest in matters unrelated to these
chapter 11 cases. Other Disclosures
37.
representation of the Debtors in general corporate matters unrelated to these chapter 11 cases
prevents Bracewell from being a disinterested party under the Bankruptcy Code.
38.
Debtors have advised Bracewell that the Debtors relationships to each other do not pose any
conflict of interest because of the general unity of interest among the Debtors. Insofar as I have
been able to ascertain, I know of no conflict of interest that would preclude Bracewells joint
representation of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases.
Affirmative Statement of Disinterestedness
39.
Based on the conflicts search conducted to date and described herein, to the best
of my knowledge and insofar as I have been able to ascertain, (a) Bracewell is a disinterested
person within the meaning of section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, as required by section
327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, and does not hold or represent an interest adverse to the Debtors
estates and (b) Bracewell has no connection to the Debtors, their creditors, or other parties in
interest, except as may be disclosed herein.
13
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 15 of 44
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Dated: March 31, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Robert G. Burns
Robert G. Burns
Partner, Bracewell LLP
14
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 16 of 44
SCHEDULE 1
The following lists contain the names of reviewed entities as described more fully in the
Declaration of Robert G. Burns in Support of the Debtors Application for the Entry of an Order
Authorizing the Retention and Employment of Bracewell LLP as Attorneys for the Debtors and
Debtors in Possession Effective Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the Burns Declaration).
Where the names of the entities reviewed are incomplete or ambiguous, the scope of the search
was intentionally broad and inclusive, and Bracewell LLP reviewed each entity in its records, as
more fully described in the Burns Declaration, matching the incomplete or ambiguous name.
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 17 of 44
SCHEDULE 1
List of Schedules
Schedule
Category
1(a)
1(b)
1(c)
Contractual Counterparties
1(d)
Equity Holders
1(e)
Insurers
1(f)
Lenders
1(g)
1(h)
1(i)
1(j)
1(k)
Credit Agreement
1(l)
Professionals
1(m)
1(n)
Significant Vendors
1(o)
Taxing Authorities
1(p)
Telecom Utilities
1(q)
United States Trustee, Judges, and Court Contracts for the District
1(r)
Utilities
1(s)
Regulatory Agencies
1(t)
Litigation Counterparties
1(u)
Notes
(1) Certain parties may fall under multiple categories. To avoid redundancy and duplication,
each vendor typically appears on one schedule.
(2) Signifies a top 30 unsecured creditor as of the Chapter 11 cases were commenced.
#5091396.1
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 18 of 44
Schedule 1(a)
Current and Recent Former Entities Affiliated with the Debtors
Denver Parent Corporation
Venoco, Inc.
Ellwood Pipeline, Inc.
TexCal Energy (LP) LLC
Whittier Pipeline Corporation
TexCal Energy (GP) LLC
TexCal Energy South Texas, L.P.
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 19 of 44
Schedule 1(b)
Current and Recent Former Directors and officers
Timothy M. Marquez
Mark A. DePuy
Scott M. Pinsonnault
Brian Donovan
Joseph A. Bondi
Joel L. Reed
Richard S. Walker
Edward J. ODonnell
Timothy A. Ficker
Terry L. Anderson
Ian Livett
Beth Behnke
Michael Edwards
Doug Griggs
Michael Wracher
Rich Keller
Heather Hatfield
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 20 of 44
Schedule 1(c)
Contractual Counterparties
Acteon US Holdings, Ltd
Nalco Company
Citibank
Phillips 66
Credit Suisse
Diligent Boardbooks
Commission
Exterran Partners
Verizon Wireless
Interact PMTI
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(d)
Equity Holders
The Denver Foundation
Bankers Trust Company of South Dakota
University of Denver
Colorado School of Mines Foundation, Inc.
Rose Community Foundation
Marquez Trust
Timothy and Bernadette Marquez Foundation
Timothy M. Marquez
Bernadette B Marquez Trust
Timothy M Marquez Trust
Page 21 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 22 of 44
Schedule 1(e)
Insurers
ACE American Insurance Company
AGCS Marine Insurance Company
Federal Insurance Company
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America / St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Lloyds of London Syndicate #33
Various Lloyds of London Syndicates
Various Lloyds of London Syndicates through Prosight, IR Underwriting & Talbot
Various Lloyds of London Syndicates and Certain Insurance Companies
AIG - Illinois National Insurance Company
AIG - National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Chubb - Federal Insurance Company
Freedom Specialty Insurance Company (Nationwide)
QBE Insurance Corporation
RLI Insurance Company
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
XL Specialty Insurance Company
Zurich Insurance Company Ltd.
Aspen US Insurance Group
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.
JLT Specialty USA
McGriff, Seibels & Williams of Texas
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(f)
Lenders
Apollo Capital Management LP
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Aon Risk Services Southwest Inc.
US Bank Trust NA
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Page 23 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(g)
First and Second Lien Secured Notes
Trustee and Collateral Agent:
US Bank National Association
Holders:
Apollo Centre Street Partnership, L.P.
Apollo Credit Opportunity Trading Fund III
Apollo Franklin Partnership, L.P.
Apollo Investment Corporation
Apollo SK Strategic Investments, L.P.
Apollo Special Opportunities Managed Account, L.P.
Apollo SPN Investments I (Credit), LLC
Apollo Zeus Strategic Investments, L.P.
Mast Credit Opportunities I Master Fund Limited
Mast OC I Master Fund LP
Mast OC I Master Fund LP Class L
Mast Select Opportunities Master Fund LP
Virtus Alternative Income Solutions Fund
Virtus Alternative Total Solutions Fund
Page 24 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 25 of 44
Schedule 1(h)
8.875% Senior Note Holders
Trustee:
Inc.
Lenders:
Company, Inc.
Company
Euroclear Bank
S.A.
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(i)
Senior PIK Toggle Notes
Blackgold Capital Management, L.P.
Indaba Capital Management, L.P.
Beach Point Capital Management, L.P.
Carlson Capital, L.P.
PPM America, Inc.
Apollo Management, L.P.
Nomura Corporate Research and Asset
Management, Inc. (U.S.)
Pine River Capital Management
Pentwater Capital Management, L.P.
Amzak Capital Management, LLC
UBS Securities, LLC (U.S.)
Driehaus Capital Management, LLC
Page 26 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 27 of 44
Schedule 1(j)
Term Loan, Security and Guaranty Agreement
Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent:
Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch
Lender
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(k)
Credit Agreement
Administrative Agent and Lender:
Citibank, N.A.
Lender:
The Bank of Nova Scotia
KeyBank National Association
Bank of America, N.A.
RB International Finance (USA) LLC
BOFK, NA dba Bank of Oklahoma
Amegy Bank National Association
Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
Santander Bank, N.A.
ABN Amro Capital USA LLC
CIT Finance LLC
Page 28 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(l)
Professionals
Bracewell LLP
Deloitte LLP
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP
PJT Partners Inc.
Ernst & Young US LLP
BMC Group, Inc.
Page 29 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(m)
Ordinary Course Professionals
Andrews Kurth LLP
Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac LLP
Buynak, Fauver, Archbald & Spray LLP
Cornerstone Research
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP
Day Carter & Murphy LLP
Diepenbrock Elkin LLP
EKS & H LLP
Gibbs & Bruns LLP
Gilchrist & Rutter Professional Corp
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & Lamprey LLP
Greenberg Glusker Fields Et Al LLP
Hein & Associates LLP
Hicks Thomas & Lilienstern LLP
K E Andrews & Company
Kassouni Law
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Marshall Law Group
Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Stoel Rives LLP
Tatro Tekosky Sadwick LLP
White & Case LLP
Page 30 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 31 of 44
Schedule 1(n)
Significant Vendors
All Copy Products Inc
Nalco Company
Phillips 66 Company
Qualspec LLC
Case Company
Spectrum Campaigns
HB Rentals
Terrain Consulting
URS Corporation
Inc.
Weatherford Us LP
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 32 of 44
Schedule 1(o)
Taxing Authorities
Office of the Ventura County Treasurer-Tax
Collector
County of Glenn Tax Collector
Kern County Treasurer-Tax Collector
State of Delaware
Finance Administration Department - City
of Beverly Hills
State of California Department of
Conservation
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 33 of 44
Schedule 1(p)
United States Trustee, Judges, and Court Contracts
for the District of Delaware (and Key Staff Members)
Attix, Lauren
Murray, Tony
Buchbinder, David
OMalley, James R.
Carey, Kevin J.
Panacio, Michael
Casey, Linda
Patton, Tiiara
Cox, Natalie
Sarkessian, Juliet
Dice, Holly
Schepacarter, Richard
Dortch, Shakima L.
Serrano, Edith
Fox, Timothy
Shannon, Brendan L.
Gerardi, David
Silverstein, Laurie S.
Giordano, Diane
Sontchi, Christopher S.
Green, Christine
Starr, Karen
Gross, Kevin
Tinker, T. Patrick
Hackman, Benjamin
Vara, Andy
Heck, Jeffrey
Vinson, Ramona
Kenney, Mark
Walrath, Mary F.
Leamy, Jane
West, Michael
McCollum, Hannah
Wynn, Dion
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(q)
Utilities
ACC Business a division of AT&T
AT&T Inc.
AT&T Mobility LLC
Carpinteria Valley Water District
Centurylink, Inc.
City of Beverly Hills Municipal Corporation
City of Taft California
City of Ventura
Cox Communications, Inc.
Goleta Water District
Pacific Gas And Electric Company
Southern California Edison Company
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Valley Water Management Co.
Verizon California, Inc.
Verizon Wireless, Inc.
Waste Management of Alameda Co Inc.
West Kern Water District
Southern California Gas Company
Satcom Global, Inc.
Page 34 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 35 of 44
Schedule 1(r)
Regulatory Agencies
Department of Interior Bureau of Land
Management
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service
Calfire/Office of The State Fire Marshal
California Coastal Commission
California Fish and Game Commission
Department of the California Highway
Patrol
Carpinteria-Summerland Fire Protection
District
City of Beverly Hills Municipal Corporation
City of Carpinteria, California
City of Goleta, California
The City of Oxnard, California
City of Taft, California
City of Ventura, California
County of Kern, Public Health Services,
Environmental Health Division
County of Kern, Building Inspection
Division
Los Angeles County Department of Public
health L/P Unit
County of Santa Barbara, California
County of Santa Barbara, Public Health
Department, Environmental Health Services
County of Santa Barbara, Planning &
Development
County of Santa Barbara, Planning &
Development, Energy Division
County of Ventura, Environmental Health
Division
County of Ventura, Planning Division
California Department of Fish And Wildlife
State of California, Department of Toxic
Substances Control, Office of Scientific
Affairs
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(s)
Litigation Counterparties
Page 36 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 1(t)
Surety Bond Holders
US Specialty Insurance Company
Aspen US Insurance Group
Argonaut Insurance Company
Aon Risk Services Southwest Inc
Page 37 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Schedule 2
Potential Parties in Interest
Page 38 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 39 of 44
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 40 of 44
Current
Former
Current
Current
Bosc, Inc.
Current
BP America
BP America
Current
Brookfield Investment
Management, Inc.
Brookfield Transmission
Current
Brookfield Investment
Management, Inc.
Current
Brookfield Investment
Management, Inc.
Current
Brookfield Investment
Management, Inc.
Current
Phillips 66
Current
Former
Contreras, Roberto
Former
CIT Energy
Current
Citibank
Citibank
Current
Citibank
Citibank
Current
Former
Current
Hamilton City
Former
Credit Suisse
Credit Suisse
Current
Deloitte LLP
Constellation NewEnergy-Gas,
Inc.
Former
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 41 of 44
Deloitte LLP
Siro Group
Former
Current
Deutsche Bank
Deutsche Bank
Current
Current
Former
Current
Current
Archrock
Current
Exterran Partners
Archrock
Current
Exxon Mobil
Exxon Mobil
Former
Current
Former
Current
Current
Hartford Investment
Management Company
Current
HB Rentals
Former
HB Rentals
Former
Current
Former
Joseph A. Bondi
Former
Former
Current
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 42 of 44
Hearst Corporation
Current
Former
OiltankingTexas City, LP
Current
Current
BM&T Dallas
Current
Current
HerJustice
Former
Nalco Company
Nalco Champion
Current
Nalco Company
Champion Technologies
Current
Nalco Company
Ecolab Inc.
Current
Nalco Company
Former
Former
Current
Former
Hearst Corporation
Current
Current
Former
Phillips 66
Phillips 66
Current
Current
Current
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 43 of 44
Richard S. Walker
Arvest Bank
Current
Schlumberger Technology
Corporation
Schlumberger Technical
Services, Inc.
Former
Schlumberger Technology
Corporation
Schlumberger Technology
Corporation
Former
Schlumberger Technology
Corporation
Schlumberger Limited
Former
Former
Former
Current
Current
Former
KBR
Current
KBR
Current
Starr Companies
Current
Former
State of Delaware
Current
State of Delaware
Current
Terry L. Anderson
Yellowstone Academy
Current
Current
Current
Current
Case 16-10655-KG
Doc 97-3
Filed 03/31/16
Page 44 of 44
Current
Current
U.S. Bank
U.S. Bank
Current
Current
URS Corporation
Current
URS Corporation
Current
Verizon Wireless
Current
Verizon Wireless
Current
Waste Management
Current
Current
McGinnes Industrial
Maintenance Corporation
Current
Current
Former
Weatherford Farms
Current