Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Roy Warden
6502 E. Golf Links Rd., #H129
Tucson, Arizona 85730
TELEPHONE: (520) 551-3496
E-MAIL: roywarden@hotmail.com
Pro Se Plaintiff
13
14
)
)
Plaintiff, In Pro Se )
)
)
vs.
)
CODY WHITAKER, and MARI- )
SOL JACQUEZ WHITAKER, Hus- )
)
band and Wife,
)
)
Defendants.
)
ROY WARDEN,
NO: C20161574
COMPLAINT
(Assault, Abuse of Process, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
THE HON. SARAH R. SIMMONS
15
16
17
1. That, at all relevant times Plaintiff Roy Warden resided in Pima County,
18
Arizona;
19
20
Jacquez Whitaker were husband and wife and resided in Pima County,
21
Arizona;
22
23
24
25
3. That, the events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in Pima County, Arizona.
PARTIES
4. That, Plaintiff is a non-partisan and unpaid political activist working on
law;
son for Gun Owners of America, is well known in the Facebook blog-
osphere for his support of 1st and 2nd amendment rights, and his advo-
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
10
11
12
Administration;
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Beginning in 2006, Plaintiff has written and posted numerous articles excoriating
the local republican political establishment for encouraging Open Border Policy and Cheap Mexican Labor Policy to supply local Republican business
owners and construction companies with an endless supply of illegal alien workers to drive down the cost of labor and drive up profits.
vocate for law and order3, became profoundly disturbed by the increas-
tation with federal law enforcement authorities and the violent overthrow
10. That, Plaintiff posted on various Facebook blogs a notice of his intent to
10
District Court Judges and U.S. Attorneys, personally liable for what ap-
11
12
26, 2016, and asked for volunteers to help with organizing the rally;
13
11. That, prior to the rally Plaintiff used the blogosphere to solicit Face-
14
15
2016;
16
12. That, prior to the rally Plaintiff posted numerous articles setting forth the
17
purpose of the rally5, as well as his cooperation with TPD and Federal
Since 2005, Plaintiff has held numerous demonstrations, appeared before the Pima
County Board of Supervisors and the Tucson City Council and written extensively, to hold Pima County and Tucson Officials accountable, in courts of law,
for acts of public malfeasance, including the promulgation of Open Border Policy, cronyism, the use of public funds to pay punitive damage awards and the
theft of a reported 200 million dollars by Tucson City Officials from the Rio
Nuevo Project.
Plaintiff posted the Rules of Conduct for the event, making clear his intent to
hold a peaceful and lawful rally. See footnote 6.
bers of patriot militia groups would disrupt the rally with violent con-
duct;
13. That, prior to the rally Plaintiff made the following announcement in the
Tucson Weekly7:
6
7
8
9
10
14. That, prior to the rally, members of various Facebook patriot militia
11
groups declared Roy Warden works for the FBI. He is leading you into
12
13
Arizona;
14
15. That, during the rally the Defendant aggressively approached within sev-
15
16
17
18
19
back into the street with no further room for retreat, and, and fearing that
20
21
On February 25, 2016 Plaintiff met with U.S. Marshal Richard Tracy, a U.S. Attorney, and 5 federal security specialists and members of TPD at the U.S. District
Court Tucson Arizona, to discuss security issues regarding the threat of militia
inspired violence on March 4, 2016.
7
Since 2006 Plaintiff has always sought widespread support on issues of community concern.
8
17. That, during a post rally interview Defendant stated (1) he only came to
the rally to call out Plaintiff for perceived insults and defamations to
usurping states rights; (3) there was a huge desire to get feds off our
backs, and that (4) in the future Defendant might involve himself in a
10
harassment at Tucson City Court seeking that (1) Plaintiff have no con-
11
tact with Defendant, (2) Plaintiff not approach within 50 yards of De-
12
fendant in public places, (3) Plaintiff must make way and not impede
13
14
15
19. That, upon the Courts refusal to impose such broad limitations on Plain-
16
17
18
Pima County Superior Court to seek the Court to enjoin Plaintiff from
19
20
21
22
23
violence counseling;
24
25
26
27
28
20. That, subsequently, on March 7, 2016, the Pima County Superior Court
issued a no contact order #C20161109;
21. That, on or about March 12-13, 2016 Plaintiff was served with both Tucson City and Pima County orders;
22. That, on March 21, 2016 Plaintiff appeared in Tucson City Court where
number M-1040-16012021.
23. That, on March 29, 2014 the Clerk of the Pima County Superior Court
notified Plaintiff that the Defendant had called for a hearing regarding
808.
COUNT I (ASSAULT)
24. That, on March 4, 2016 Defendant did cause Plaintiff Warden to have a
10
11
12
25. That, on March 7, 2016, March 21, 2016 and April 14, 201610 Defendant
13
14
purpose for which the process or procedure was not designed and (2)
15
16
17
18
19
26. That, on March 4, 2016 and March 21, 2016 Defendant, knowing that
20
21
22
and outrageous, causing Plaintiff, in fear for his life, to utter extreme
23
24
25
lows:
1a For special damages in an amount to be determined herein;
26
10
5
6
7
law;
6a For such other and further relief as the Court or jury deems just and
proper.
DATED this 1st day of April, 2016.
8
9
By:
_________________________
Plaintiff, Roy Warden
10
11
12