Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
The data in this 2015 edition supersede all historical data previously published by UNICEF, WHO and World Bank Group.
UNICEF/GHAA2015-01436/Quarmyne
Global overview
Stunting
The global trend in
stunting prevalence
and numbers of
children affected is
decreasing...
- 96M
and numbers
affected declined
from 255 million to
159 million.
1990
2014
Overweight
The global trend
in overweight
prevalence and
numbers of children
affected is
rising.
+ 10M
and numbers
affected have risen
from 31 million to
41 million.
1990
2014
Wasting
In 2014, the global
wasting rate was
7.5 per cent.
50M
Globally, 50 million
children under 5
were wasted, of
which 16 million
were severely
wasted in 2014.
159 million
were stunted
41 million
were overweight
20M
50 million
were wasted
(each pair of children represents 20 million children)
UNICEF
<uni.cf/jmedashboard2015>
WHO
<www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/estimates>
World Bank Group
<data.worldbank.org/child-malnutrition>
Asia
70
Africa
Asia*
Latin America
and
Caribbean
Latin
America
Oceania*
Oceania**
and Caribbean
60
per cent
50
47.6
42.3
40
32.0
25.1
30
stunting
overweight
95% confidence interval
38.1
35.9
24.5
20
11.7
8.9
6.6
3.4
2010
2005
2000
1995
1990
2014
2010
2005
2000
7.2
1995
1990
2010
2005
2000
1995
1990
2014
5.7
4.9
2014
2010
2005
2000
1995
5.4
4.0
1990
10
2014
Africa
*Asia (excluding Japan); **Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) 1990 and 1995 estimates had consecutive low population coverage.
Source: UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Group joint malnutrition estimates, 2015 edition.
Unequal progress in
stunting reduction
since 1990
-24%
Africa
...progress among
subregions has
been uneven.
While Asia as a
whole has cut
stunting by almost
half...
-47%
Asia
Eastern
Asia
- 82%
2x
reduction
- 41%
Southern
Asia
In 2014, one subregion was above the public health emergency line for wasting
Percentage of children under 5 wasted, by United Nations subregion, 2014
3.9
1.1
Poor
5 - < 10%
Serious
10 - < 15%
Critical
15%
No data
Public
health
emergency
range
Central
America
3.1
Caribbean
1.4
South
America
2.1
Central
Asia 14.2
7.5
Acceptable
< 5%
Eastern
4.0
Asia*
Northern Africa
Southern
Western
9.3
9.0
Asia
Asia
6.7
Western
7.9
Southeastern
Africa
Eastern
Asia
Middle
Africa
Africa
5.4
9.0
Oceania
Three subregions
are approaching
the public health
emergency line.
Southern
Africa
*Eastern Asia, excluding Japan
**Oceania, excluding Australia and New Zealand
Source: UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Group joint malnutrition estimates, 2015 edition.
This map is stylized and not to scale. It does not reflect a position by UNICEF,
WHO or World Bank Group on the legal status of any country or territory or
the delimitation of any frontiers.
*Note it is possible for a child to show combinations of malnutrition, such as be stunted and overweight or stunted and wasted.
200
1990
2014
1990
increase
15
+23%
100
2014
nearly 3x
+91%
20
-52%
150
25
+67%
-57%
10
+5%
50
190
47
91
58
14
0.5
0.3
16.0 19.6
10.3
3.9
0.03 0.12
*Asia (excluding Japan); **Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) 1990 estimate had consecutive low population coverage.
Source: UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Group joint malnutrition estimates 2015 edition.
Asia 57%
Asia 48%
Africal.37%
Africal.25%
Asia
34.3 M
Africa
13.9 M
Latin America
and Caribbean 0.7 M
Oceania
0.1 M
Asia 68%
Africal.28%
The underlying data for global and regional estimates are from
country-level household surveys. Such country data are collected
infrequently and measure malnutrition at one point in time. This
makes it difficult to capture the rapid fluctuations of wasting and
severe wasting over time. For programme purposes, incidence data
(i.e., the number of new cases that occur during an entire calendar
year) would be ideal, however, these currently do not exist.
Low-income
70
60
54.6
55.3
Lower-middleincome
Upper-middle-income
stunting
overweight
95% confidence interval
37.6
40
33.5
32.6
30
20
7.5
4.9
Source: UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Group joint malnutrition estimates, 2015 edition.
2010
2005
2000
6.8
1995
1990
2014
2010
2005
2000
1995
6.8
2014
2.7
1990
2014
2010
2005
2000
3.4
3.1
1995
10
1990
per cent
50
Unequal progress in
stunting reduction
since 1990
-32%
-77%
1990
2x
as high
2014
Low-income and lower-middle-income countries now account for almost all stunted children
worldwide
The share of all stunted children that live in lowincome and lower-middle-income countries has
shifted from 7 in 10 to 9 in 10 between 1990 and
2014.
1990
2014
Lower-income countries bear a disproportionate share of stunted children relative to the total
population distribution
Less than half of all children under 5 lived in lowermiddle-income countries in 2014, yet these countries
accounted for two thirds of all stunted children globally.
47%
26%
66%
24%
15%
8%
Share of under-5
population in 2014
Notes on methodology
The analysis methods have remained unchanged from the 2012 report, except for some minor refinements detailed below:
1. Year assigned to each survey
When data collection begins in one calendar year and continues into the next, the survey year assigned
is the one in which most of the fieldwork took place. For example, if a survey was conducted between
1 September 2009 and 28 February 2010, the year 2009 would be assigned, since the majority of data
collection took place in that year (i.e., four months in 2009 versus two months in 2010). This method
has been used since the 2013 edition (prior to that, the latter year was used by default e.g., 2010 in
the example above).
FINAL
Spain
Niue
Suriname Zambia
Belgium
Madagascar
Brazil
Uzbekistan
China
Senegal
Morocco Saudi Arabia Samoa Holy See Mozambique Mongolia
Slovakia
Malaysia
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Namibia
Jordan
State of Palestine Uganda Democratic Republic of the Congo
Kuwait United Arab Emirates Nepal Peru
Mauritania
Nauru Saint Lucia Croatia
Mali
Nicaragua Bahrain
Costa Rica
Cuba
Albania
Sri Lanka
Turkmenistan
Montenegro
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Hungary
Portugal
Bulgaria Afghanistan
United Kingdom Togo
Myanmar
Slovenia Republic of Moldova
Tunisia
Pakistan Honduras
Kenya
Zimbabwe Belize Algeria Bosnia and Herzegovina
Finland Tajikistan Sao Tome and Principe Italy
Rwanda
South Sudan Micronesia (Federated States of)
Tonga
Australia
Qatar
Djibouti
Timor-Leste Estonia
Thailand Kazakhstan
Paraguay
Armenia
Guinea Bangladesh
Azerbaijan
Cabo Verde
Cameroon Kiribati Gabon
Kyrgyzstan
Ghana
South Africa
Uruguay Switzerland Sudan Malawi
Palau
United States
Nigeria
India
Mexico
Jamaica
Benin Belarus
Russian Federation
Romania
Cte d'Ivoire
Ireland
Singapore
Burundi Haiti Canada Ethiopia Indonesia
Israel
Austria Guatemala
Guyana
Equatorial Guinea
Iraq Chad
Chile Angola
Trinidad and Tobago Ukraine
Norway
Sweden
Tuvalu
Bahamas Yemen
Monaco
Germany Eritrea
Lithuania
Turkey
Barbados
Marshall Islands
Cyprus
Mauritius
Fiji Dominica
Iceland
Lebanon
Netherlands
Niger
Oman
Botswana
Central African Republic
Japan
Bhutan
Argentina
Swaziland
Gambia
Maldives
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
2010
JAN
FEB
V 0.1
Sierra Leone
2009
Panama
Andorra
Georgia
Serbia
Comoros
Liechtenstein
New Zealand
This brochure was prepared by the Data and Analytics Section of the Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF New York, the
Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, WHO Geneva and the Development Data Group, World Bank Group Washington
DC. September 2015.
Email: data@unicef.org
data.unicef.org
Email: nutrition@who.int
www.who.int/nutrition
Email: data@worldbank.org
data.worldbank.org