Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
PRESENTEDTO:
IAFEAnnualMeeting
BY:
EvanPicoult,ManagingDirector
RiskArchitecture
Citigroup
NewYork,NewYork
DATE:
Wednesday,May24,2006
PLACE:
NYC
RiskCapital BasicConceptsSummary
Measurementofrisk:
Potentialunexpectedlossoverone
yearataveryhighconfidencelevel
Howhighisthepotentialflood?
RiskCapital
(a.k.a.EconomicCapital)
Banks
Internal
Measurements
Advancedbanksusemore
sophisticatedmeasuresthan
prescribedbyBasel
Measurementoffinancialresources
toabsorblossesandavoid
insolvency.
Howhighisthedam?
Tangibleequityisonesuch
measure.
i.e.Bookcapitalminusgoodwilland
otherintangibles.
HigherConfidenceLevel
PortfolioEffects
MoreRiskTypes
BaselIIs
Measurements
RiskWeightedAssets(RWA)
RWA=12.5*RiskCapBaselII
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
Tier1capital
Tier2capital
PAGE2
StructureofBaselII
BASELII
MinimumCapital
PillarIwillhave
largestimpactfor
manybanksbecause
of:
a)RiskInfrastructure
neededfor
calculationofRWA
forcreditrisk.
b) RiskInfrastructure
neededfor
calculationofRWA
foroperationalrisk.
CreditRisk
Morerisk
sensitivity
OperationalRisk
New
TradingMarket
Risk
Enhanced
standards.
c) Enhanced
infrastructurefor
tradingmarketrisk.
d) Differentialimpact
onRWAforeach
risktype.
PillarI
Supervisory
Review
Supervisory
assessmentof
banks:
Risk
management
policiesand
practices
Market
Disclosure
Mandates
increased
minimumpublic
disclosureof
banksrisk
information.
Economic
capitalprocess.
Canresultin
additional
capital
requirements
PillarII
PillarIII
Pillarsareintendedtobemutuallyreinforcingandinterlinked.
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
PAGE3
BaselII:MethodsforcalculatingRWA(RiskWeightedAssets)
RISKWEIGHTEDASSETS(RWA)
BaselIIallowsseveralapproaches(methods)forcalculatingRiskWeightedAssetsforeachof
thethreerisktypesitrecognizes.
USregulatorswillonlyallowtheAdvancedInternalRatingsBasedApproachforCreditandthe
AMAforOpRisk.
RISKWEIGHTEDASSETS
RWAFORMARKETRISK
Standardized
VAR
InternalRiskModel
RWAFORCREDITRISK
RWAFOROPERATIONALRISK
Standardized
Basic
FoundationalIRB
Standardized
AdvancedIRB
AMA
Internalriskparameters.
Banksarenotallowedtouse
internalmodelofcreditrisk.
EquityInvestments
Securitization
InternalRiskModel
Other
Other: PurchasedReceivables
ResidualLeases
MTMportfolios
NoRWAfor:
Accrualinterestrate
risk.
CrossBorderRisk
BusinessP/LRisk
Bankingbookportfolios,includingAFS,
pluscounterpartycreditrisk
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
PAGE4
BaselIIU.S.contrastedwithothercountries
UNITEDSTATES
EUROPE,JAPANANDOTHERCOUNTRIES
Scopeofcoverage
Scopeofcoverage
TheFed/OCC/FDICwillonlyrequirethe
largest(~10)internationallyactivebanksto
implementBaselII.
InEuropeandJapanallbankswillhaveto
implementoneofthethreeBasel
approaches.
OtherU.S.banksmaychoosetoimplement
BaselIIorremainonthecurrentrules.
Perhapsanother10orsolargecommercial
bankswillimplementBaselII.
U.S.investmentsbankswithoperationsin
EuropeneedtoimplementtheSECs
ConsolidatedSupervisoryEntity(CSE)
approach,whichsimilartoBaselII.Other
investmentbankscanvoluntaryimplement
theCSEapproach
ApproachesAllowed
TheFed/OCC/FDICwillonlyallowthe
AdvancedInternalRatingsBasedApproach
forCreditRiskandtheAMAapproachfor
OperationalRisk.
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
ApproachesAllowed
Allthreeapproachesforcreditandall
threeapproachesforoperationalriskwill
beallowed.
PAGE5
ComparisonofDraftNPRtoFinalBaselIIrules
TimingofImplementation
BaselII
AdoptedbyEUandothers
DraftNPR
ForUSadoption
(NPRisexpectedtobe
releasedbefroetheendof
June2006.Bankswillhave
120daystorespond).
2007
ParallelRun
2008
Live.Floor=90%
ParallelRun*
2009
Live.Floor=80%
Live.Floor=95%*
2010
Live.Nofloor
Live.Floor=90%*
2011
Live.Nofloor
Live.Floor=85%*
2012
Live.Nofloor
Live.NoFloor?*
*Notes:
USwillhavetransitionphasesratherthantransitionyears. Approvaltogoliveandtoenter
eachphasewillrequireregulatoryapproval.
USregulatorswillrecalibrateBaselIIifsystemwidecapitalrequirementsfallbymorethan10%.
Thisisarbitraryanddefeatsthepurposeofhavingarisksensitivemeasureofcreditrisk.A
studybythefourlargeUSbankshasfoundthatRWAforwholesalecredit(forafixedportfolio)
wouldberoughly35%higherduringbottomofeconomiccyclerelativetopeakofcycle,under
theBaselIIformula.
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
PAGE6
MarketRiskInTradingBook:Issues
BackgroundofRegulatoryConcerns
ConcernOverCompositionofTradingBook
Regulatorsconcernedaboutincreasingnumberofilliquid,complexstructured,creditsensitive,long
lastingtransactionsintradingportfolios.
ConcernOverIncreasedIncentiveforRegulatoryArbitrage
GreaterrisksensitivityunderBaselIImeansthatunsecurednoninvestmentgradeassetsinaccrual
portfolioswillhaveriskweights>100%.Thus,concernaboutincreasedincentiveforregulatory
arbitragebetweenbankingandtradingbook.
AdditionalConcerns:
SomeUSInvestmentBanks,whicharenowsubjecttoBaselrules,haveessentiallynobankingbook.
ChangesinaccountingrulesmayallowfirmstoselectivelyuseFairValueAccountingforloans.
Requirements
PoliciesAndProcedures:
FirmsmusthaveclearsetofPoliciesandProceduresspecifyingwhatpositionscouldbeincludedinor
excludedfromtradingbook.
VAR:
EverythingthatpassesthedefinitionofthetradingbookcanbeincludedinVAR.
MinimumIncrementalRWAforparticularsecuritizationexposures
TheincrementalRWAgeneratedbycertainsecuritizationexposuresmustbeequaltoorgreaterthan
whatwouldbecalculatedwiththesecuritizationrules.
However,anexceptiontotheabovewillbemadetobanksthataredealersintheaboveexposureswhen
theycandemonstratetradingintent,liquidtwowaymarket,etc.
RequiredEnhancementofVARModels.
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
PAGE7
MarketRiskInTradingBook:FinalRules
BanksmustenhancetheirVARModels:
FormulaforRWAformarketriskincurrentandnewBaselproposal:
RWA_Market_Risk =12.5*Basel_Risk_Capital_Market_Risk
UnderthecurrentmethodbanksweregivenachoiceforcalculatingRiskCapitalbasedonVAR:
a) IfVARexplicitlymodelsissuerspecificeventanddefaultrisk:
Basel_Risk_Capital_Market_Risk =3*VAR'_10day_99%CL Nobankhasbeengivenapprovalforthis.
b) IfVARonlymodelsidiosyncraticriskbutdoesnotexplicitlymodeldefaultrisk:
Basel_Risk_Capital_Market_Risk =3*VAR_10day_99%CL +VAR_Specific_10day_99%CL
UndertheJuly,2005methodBaselRiskCapitalwouldhavetwocomponents:
a) 3*VAR'_10day_99%CL
Includingissuerspecificeventanddefaultrisk.
b) Incrementaldefaultriskforpositionsforwhichitwilltakemorethantendaystodefeasethedefaultrisk.
ThestandardsfordefiningandmeasuringincrementaldefaultareonlyvaguelydefinedintheJuly,2005
Document.Thisissomethingtheregulatorsandtheindustryhavestartedtojointlydiscuss.Firmsthat
alreadyhaveapprovedmodelsforspecificriskwillhaveuntilJanuary1,2010toimplementtherequired
enhancements..
Inthelimitofanilliquidpositionthatwouldtakeoneyeartodefease,theincrementalRWAmustbeatleast
aslargeasthatderivedfromtheBaselIIloanformula.
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
PAGE8
BaselIIConcerns
Ideal:
RWAshouldbebasedona,comprehensive,risksensitivemeasurementof
economicrisk.Itthuswouldbefullyconsistentwitharationalmeasurementof
internalriskcapital,onlyatalowerconfidencelevel.Therefore,RWAwould
notbeabindingconstraintonrational,economicdecisionmaking.
RWAcalculationsshouldleverageoffofgoodinternalriskmanagement
processesanditsimplementationwouldthenentailonlyasmallincremental
cost.
Concernsofbadoutcome:
RWAaredisconnectedfromrisksensitivitybecauseoftheimpositionof
differenttypesoffloors.
RWAbecomesabindingconstraintbecauseoftheimpositionofregulatory
overridestoaninternaleconomicanalysis(intheformoffloors,stressed
LGDs,minimumPDs,lackoffullrecognitionofdoubledefaultbenefit,etc.)
makestheeffectiveconfidencelevelunrealisticallyhigh.
Bankshavetobuildexpensiveinternalprocessesthatonlyservethepurpose
ofregulatoryreporting,notinternalriskmanagement.
EvanPicoult,CitigroupMay,2006
PAGE9
WhereisalltheStability?
(OrDoHedgeFundsPoseSystemicRisk?)
(OrDoHedgeFundsPoseSystemicRisk?)
Discussionby:
RichardR.Lindsey
Bear,StearnsSecuritiesCorp.
24May2006
CausesofSystemicRisk
ExchangeTradedDerivatives
FinancialFutures
ProgramTrading
PortfolioInsurance
OTCDerivatives
JunkBonds
EmergingMarkets
CMOs
CreditDerivatives
HedgeFunds!?
11
Source:GreenwichAssociates,CSFB,BersteinResearch
11
HedgeFundsHaveExpandedRapidly
WorldwideHedgeFundAssets($inbillions)
$1,200
NumberofHedgeFundsWorldwide
$1,200
8,000
$1,105
$1,000
8,000
6,667
$1,000
$600
$600
$491
$400
$400
$200
15% CAGR
6,000
6,000
4,000
4,000
3,335
2,000
2,000
HedgeFunds(ex.FoHFs)
$800
Assets
Assets
$800
HedgeFunds(ex.FoHFs)
18% CAGR
$200
$0
$0
2000
2001
2002
2003
Year
2004
2005
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Year
12
12
EstimatedStrategyCompositionbyAUM1990
1990
Convert. Arb.
0.5%
Sector (Total)
0.3%
Emerging Market
0.4%
Distressed Securities
2.4%
Equity Hedge
5.3%
Equity Market
Neutral
1.7%
Equity NonHedge
0.6%
EventDriven
3.8%
Merger Arb.
0.6%
FI: Arbitrage
3.2%
Global Macro
72%
13
Note:FromHFR
13
EstimatedStrategyCompositionbyAUM2006
2006
Equity Hedge
30.4%
Emerging Markets
4.3%
Distressed Securities
4.6%
Equity NonHedge
4.6%
Convertible
Arbitrage
3.1%
Event
Driven
14%
Short Selling
0.3%
Sector
4.8%
Relative Value
Arbitrage
11.9%
Equity Market
Neutral
2.2%
FI: Arbitrage
3%
Global Macro
72%
Regulation D
0.2%
Merger Arbitrage
1.4%
Macro
Market Timing 10.3% FI: MortgageBacked
0.4%
FI: Diversified
1.7%
2.4%
14
Note:FromHFR20061QReport
14
ConcentrationofHedgeFundAssets
3,500 (3)
$1,100
100%
100%
$250
$76M/HF
75
75
$200
50
23%of
Assets
94%of
Firms
18%of
Assets
3,300
50
$2B/HF
25
$650
(2)
100
3%of
Firms
3%of
Firms
59%of
Assets
25
(1)
100
$6.5B/HF
HedgeFundFamilies
0
HedgeFundAssets
Notes:
1. Source: AbsoluteReturn,Feb2006
2. Source:TheHedgeFund100,
AlphaMagazine,May/June2005
15
3. Source:StrategicFinancialSolutionsestimates3,500GeneralPartnersbasedonHFdatabasestudy
15
HedgeFundsareActiveMarketParticipants
TheyAccountfor3540%ofOverallEquityCommissionsinUSandAsia
TheyAccountfor4050%ofDailyTurnoverontheNewYorkandLondonStock
Exchanges
TheyDominateConvertibleBondTradingFlows,Accountingforover70%of
TotalVolume
TheyAccountfor2030%oftheCreditDefaultSwapVolume
TheyRepresent82%oftheTradingVolumeinUSDistressedDebt
TheyareAlmost33%ofTradinginUSSpeculativeGradeBonds
TheyDominateUSExchangeTradedFunds,Controlling70%oftheVolume
TheyareHeavilyintoGlobalForeignExchange,Representing1015%of
WorldwideVolume
16
Source:GreenwichAssociates,CSFB,BersteinResearch
16
InvestmentOpportunities
InvestmentOpportunities
Traditional
PassiveStrategies
Alternative
ActiveStrategies
IncreasingInefficiencies
Convertibles / Warrants
Emerging M arket Bonds
Small Cap Stocks
High Yield Bonds
Large Cap Stocks
Corporate Bonds
G7 Bonds
Cash Instruments
IncreasingPotentialtoAddValue
17
17
HedgeFundLeverage
BalanceSheetLeverage
InstrumentLeverage
DryPowderAgreements
LeverageonLeverage
18
18
InstitutionalExposuretoHedgeFunds
PrimeBrokerage
Financing
CounterpartyTrading
CorrelatedTrading
SecondaryMarketEffects
19
19
HedgeFundsandMarketEfficiency
DiversificationandPooling
LowCorrelationwithTraditionalAssetClassesProvidesmoreDiversification
Opportunities
PoolCapitalfromInvestorsandProfessionallyShapeitsUtilization
PriceEfficiency
HedgeFundsAttempttoExploitInefficienciesinFinancialMarkets
TheActivityofHedgeFundsProvideMorePriceInformationtotheMarket,TherebyImprovingPricingEfficiency
TheExploitationofInefficienciesLeadstotheResolutionofInefficiencies
Liquidity
HedgeFundshaveaRelativelySmallProportionofInvestmentAssets
UseLeverage,ShortSalesandDerivatives
CanInvestinSpecialorIllLiquidInstruments
ActiveTradingVolume
20
20
WhoHastheRisk?
SymmetricalRisks?
- HedgeFundsPoseRiskstoFinancialInstitutions
- FinancialInstitutionsPoseRiskstoHedgeFunds
BuyersofRisk?
- HedgeFundsTakeRiskOutoftheRegulatedSector
- SpreadRisktoInvestors
DoInvestorsUnderstand?
EconomicallyEfficient?
21
21
TradingVolatility
NegativeTradingDays
TradingRevenueVolatility
BearStearns
BearStearns
GoldmanSachs
GoldmanSachs
Lehman
Brothers
Lehman
Brothers
MerrillLynch
MerrillLynch
Morgan
Stanley
Morgan
Stanley
10
20
2002
30
2003
40
2004
50
60
0%
5%
2005
Notes:
1) TradingRevenueVolatilitymeasuredbystandarddeviationoftradingrevenueas%ofitsmean,overthreeyearstoQ42005
22
2) Source:Moodys.asreportingin TheEconomist 29Apr06
22