Janice Wolk Grenadier

15 West Spring Street

Alexandria Virginia 22301
202-368-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
December 22, 2015
Hon. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief Judge
United States District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria)
Walter E. Hoffman Courthouse
600 Granby Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
(757) 222-7001
RE: Case No. 1:15-cv-1497-GBL-IDD 1:14 cv 827 LMB/TCB Eastern District of Virginia ( Alexandria Court House)
Appeal Nos 15 1169 & No. 15 1751 Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson lll, Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, Senior Judge Clyde H.
Hamilton
Dear Chief Judge Beach Smith:

THIS LETTER IS IN Re: 1:15-cv-1497-GBL-IDD the Order received in the mail December 18, 2015 shows a pattern
and practice of your mismanagement of the Eastern Division courts and the corruption of the Judges in the Federal
Judicial System in Virginia and Washington DC. To rule in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution to ignore
the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States of America and the United States Constitution.
I will give you one week to clean this up. This is not a threat or any type of extortion this is an opportunity for you to say
I made a mistake not taking this issue serious and the corruption of Judge Binkema and Judge Lee serious and I would
like to fix this issue as their supervisor and the supervisor of this court.
I have attached a letter in the record of a past case with Judge Lee which clearly explains why he should recuse and
that he chose not to and calls illegal jailing and torture and obvious criminal activity by the Judiciary, the
Government and Elected Officials frivolous utterly without merit does not understand the law or the United
States Constitution.
That Judge Brinkema, again Judge Lee and other Judges using the trick of libel and slander labeling frivolous is the exact
opposite of what our Untied States Constitution or the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court of the Untied States call for in Due
Process. U.S. Supreme Court decisions have clearly described the criteria for a frivolous label. The facts clearly show that not a
single action filed by Petitioner could possibly have met this definition. Fourth Circuit district and appellate judges have reversed
this criteria, using this tactic to block Petitioner's reporting of the crimes and block her defenses against the judicial acts taken to
silence him and to retaliate against her. The Supreme Court defined the legal the term, "frivolous," in Anders v. California (1967)
386 U.S. 738, when it wrote: "An appeal [or complaint] is not frivolous if "any of the legal points [are] arguable on their merits ..."
Another similar definition of frivolous is found in California Code of Civil Procedure 907: (2) "Frivolous" means (A) totally and
completely without merit or (B) for the sole purpose of harassing an opposing party. Making reference to Anders, the California
Supreme Court defined frivolous in In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637: The Court then addressed the important
Constitutional right of due process: "Free access to the courts is an important and valuable aspect of an effective system of
jurisprudence, and a party possessing a colorable claim must be allowed to assert it without fear of suffering a penalty more severe
than that typically imposed on defeated parties ... Fundamental constitutional mandates require that the basic protections of due
process be followed ...
Again the Injustice Orders were swift and harsh and Justice if it is coming is moving at
a snails pace.
Warmly,
Janice Wolk Grenadier

cc: The Honorable Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Director James B. Comey, Federal
Bureau of Investigation. The Honorable Terry McAuliffe, Senator Chuck Grassley, Attorney General Mark Herring,