Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Volume 2, Issue 12, December - 2015. ISSN 2348 4853, Impact Factor 1.317
I.
INTRODUCTION
The most important component in an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) is monitoring the traffic. In
the process of vehicle classification, data annotation and collection of data is a very time consuming as
well as costly task. Annotation [1] is used to label vehicles, outlining the shapes and assigning the correct
classification, so that it could be used in classifying and performance evaluation. This approach is for
vehicle annotation for samples recorded from the urban traffic CCTV cameras. Automatic image analysis
is used to detect vehicles and they are classified into several categories such as car, motorcycle, van, and
bus by using a vector, called vehicle observation vector, which is constructed by the features, the size and
the shapes of vehicles. The initial class label is computed first by using unsupervised K-means clustering,
for each detected vehicle.
The most important component in an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) is monitoring the
traffic which can be used to detect traffic length, illegal maneuvers, to estimate speed and flow, road
usage and so on.
The roadside CCTV cameras are used in many countries to enable the online monitoring of traffic and
classification of vehicles that would be used to support an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS).
Classification of vehicles is also very useful for the identification of the behaviour of vehicles.
Vehicle classification system provides the quantitative data for planners and managers for a road
traffic survey of traffic.
www.ijafrc.org
Detection of moving objects in the scene, during vehicle classification, to high level analysis.
www.ijafrc.org
www.ijafrc.org
A. Feature Vectors
www.ijafrc.org
www.ijafrc.org
Step 1: In this step, the extra images, captured in the backside view of the vehicle in the image, are
decomposed by contourlet transformation. After performing this transform, Contourlet coefficients in
different directions and various sub-bands, will be obtained as a result(for image 120120). As proved
before, the obtained coefficients include of complex values, so well get the normalization of Contourlet
coefficients.
Step 2: A useful property of the standard deviation is that it is expressed in the same units as the data.
For the extraction of best features, and decreasing the feature vector size for each picture, we perform
standard deviation criteria in various directions and different sub-bands of Contourlet coefficients matrix
and then reduce the dimension of feature vector.
Step 3: Then, well get 32 elements of feature vectors values from step 2 and we will normalize them in a
distance of 0 and 1.
C. Classification:
This is vehicle classification stage and the features from step 3 are used for the classification. The 3 kinds
of classifiers which are used are as follows:(1) SVM (one versus one) (2) K nearest-neighbour and (3) SVM (one versus all). Below is given the
structure of vehicle recognition algorithm is:
Support Vector Machine Classifiers can be use for classification and regression. SVM is based on
statistical learning theory. It is a group of unsupervised learning methods. And K-nearest neighbour
classifiers are used for vehicle type classification by the feature vector obtained from above process. The
nearest features are split into groups which are similar to features in same group and are very different
from features in different groups. Empirical risk of training set is the mean error rate so the SVM tries to
bind the risk to minimum thats why it focused on structural risk rather than empirical risk.
www.ijafrc.org
Normalization
Contourlet Transform
Local standard
deviations in
scale & various
angels in
contourlet
coefficients
matrix
Standard Deviations
Classifiers
Fig 4. Recognition Process
V. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Datasets
The right performance of this algorithm which is proposed is tested, for which weve examined 4 mostly
available classes of vehicles, that include woks wagon, pride, renault and hyundai. 400 images, from the
backside view of these vehicles, are included in the total data set. 240 images are in the training data set
and there are 70 images in test dataset.
To get feature vector, in this study, the SD on Contourlet coefficients in different directions and various
sub bands is pormed by us. In our experiments, the Contourlet transform that is used, decomposes an
image into m sub bands (m=1, 2, 3 ) using the '9-7' bi-orthogonal filters.
Quality Measures
SVM tries to bind the risk to minimum thats why it focused on structural risk rather than
empirical risk.
By doing normalization, we can reduce the dimension of the feature vector.
The right recognition rate of vehicles model is about 99% in this recognition system.
Pyramidal Level
1
2
3
4
1, 2
Recognition Rate
Using KNN
24%
62%
70%
89%
59%
75%
81%
65%
60%
67%
As a result of this, the number of features will decrease from a very large number to 32 features only.
This is done by using standard deviation criteria in different sub bands and various directions. The
features are divided into 4 groups i.e. 2 to 4 which are related to pyramidal level 1, 5 to 8 which are
related to pyramidal level 2, 9 to 16 which are related to pyramidal level 3, 17 to 32 which are related to
pyramidal level 4. The result will show that the Support Vector Machine (one versus one) classifiers give
the best result among all. The difference between SVM(one versus one) and SVM(one versus all) is shown
evidently inefficient at the time of recognition process.
VII. CONCLUSION
We have used the backward views of vehicles, for creating the recognition process, to get the feature
vectors. Also a new algorithm is proposed which is a composition of contourlet Transform and Standard
Deviation criteria to get the contourlet coefficients matrix. This study also shown the comparison of
different type of classifiers. The 3 kinds of classifiers which are used to compare are:- SVM (one versus
one), K nearest-neighbor and SVM (one versus all). The obtained numerical experimental result proves
that SVM (one versus one) is the best classifier among all, associated with the contourlet data of preprocessing.
VIII. REFERENCES
[1]
Zezhi Chen, Tim Ellis: Semi-automatic annotation samples for vehicle type classification in urban
environments, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pg. 240249, 2015
[2]
Yu-Chen Wang, Cheng-Ta Hsieh, Chin-Chuan Han, Kuo-Chin Fan: Vehicle Type Classification from
Surveillance Videos on Urban Roads, IEEE, pg. 266-270, 2014
[3]
L. Li, W. Huang, Y. H. Gu and Q. Tian, Foreground object detection from videos containing
complex background, ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, pg. 2-10, 2003.
[4]
Nick Pears, Michael Freeman and Jim Austin: Road Vehicle Classification using Support Vector
Machines, IEEE, pg. 214-218, 2009
[5]
Satish Madhogaria, Paul M. Baaggenstoss, Marek Schikora Wolfgang Koch, Daniel Cremers: Car
Detection by Fusion of HOG and Causal MRF, IEEE Transaction on aerospace and electrical
systems Vol. 51, No. 1, pg. 575-590, 2015
[6]
V. Vapnik, An overview of statistical learning theory, IEEE Transaction on neural networks, vol.
10, No. 5, pg. 988-999, 1999.
www.ijafrc.org