faith-theology.

com

http://www.faith-theology.com/2016/01/the-love-of-apatheia.html

The love of apatheia

What if passion is an impediment to love? When studying the early church, students seem
to find no idea as foreign to their own context as the counsel to put aside the passions.
Sentiment, after all, is the only universal we have left. Having banished truth and beauty to
the realm of the relative, the only appeal to a common humanity left to us is a single finger
gesturing to the heart. Can we moderns say with the desert monastics that passion is
demonic?
In the City of God, Augustine searches out the misery of the demons. The
word daemon refers to "knowing", but theirs is not a dispassionate knowledge or a cold
reason. What makes the demons miserable is that they are essentially all knowledge and
all passion. Yet, one thing they lack. Citing 1 Corinthians 8:1, Augustine reasons with Paul
to say that "knowledge is of no benefit without love. Without love... [knowledge] swells
people up with a pride that is nothing but empty windiness." Bereft of love, the demons
become the rage that is perfect knowledge united with frustrated passion. Demons are
beings of knowledge unconditioned by love.
For Augustine, passions are sanctified by the godly mind, to be "instruments of justice...
The question is not whether the godly mind is angered, but why; not whether it is
saddened, but why." The passions are rightly utilised to the extent that they empower
compassion.
So we might ask: can apatheia enable love? Does the denial of passion open the door to
compassion? Frances Young reflects on this question with reference to caring for her son,
Arthur, who was born with a severe learning disability. For Young, Apatheia is not mere
emotional suppression. Apatheia, which Evagrius believes is never actually attained in
this life, should be understood as emotional integration, or that detachment which is
essential to true love (God's Presence, 292). Not only does apatheia enable love, it
reveals the true character of love to us:

Sometimes what passes for love is really self-centred anxiety, as I have

realized when time and again distressed by Arthurs distress, finding it hard
to cope when he is unsettled, unwell, or in pain, cannot express what is

wrong, and the more we try to sort the problem the more frantic and furious
he gets, hating to be handled, not understanding that were trying to deal
with his discomfort. Frustration mounts, creating its own distress and anger,
which hardly helps hisin fact, compounds it. Too easily inner demons of
self-pity, a sense of failure, inadequacy and helplessness take over. So I
recognize that I really need apatheia in order to love properly. Love requires
a degree of detachment, an ability to let the other person be, to be other,
to be what they are rather than what you want them to be. (292-293).

The practice of apatheia might just be a way of laying down our lives for the sake of
another.