Kingdom of Debre Zeit

A NEW Landlocked Sovereign Nation State (POLITICAKL ENTITY) in Jamaica

CIVIL GRAND JURY INDICTMENT

Dated 14 1 2016

Re: political malpractice (Negligence) by Foreign Affairs Minister AJ

Nicholson
"It is also the duty of the Civil Grand Jury to inquire into the condition and management
of prisons and other buildings and institutions of the country, inquire into the condition of
the country treasury (Central Bank), into any abuse of office by state (politicians) or
local officers (security forces), and to report the results of its actions to the ICJ

SUMMARY
When the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) charter was signed
(Authorized) in 1948, the international commuity heralded it with great fanfare. Public
reports of the opening of the United Nations described both the wide acceptance of the
UDHR charter by every member nation state present.
Henceforth, great efforts were made to safeguard the universal human rights of the
individual under national, as well as international human rights Law of fundamental
equality for all nation states.
The Kingdom of Debre Zeit's CIVIL GRAND JURY (GJ) found that although the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights charter has a 'security interest' for every human
being on the planet, it does not apply to those who do not ADHERE to the charter under
international law.

Furthermore, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is responsible for the international relations
of the government, and cannot assume a role of plausible deniability, when the
international remedies that the United Nations offer, must come through the channels of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Office, just as the Vienna Convention also noted, or any
other such Office.

INTRODUCTION
The CIVIL GRAND JURY learned of an international remedy against Jesuit (State)
Corruption, incompetence and immaturity. The purpose of the human rights investigation
was to determine how Jesuit taught politicians respond to universal human rights claims
(lawful disputes)of equality, in our modern world of social democracy

PROCEDURE
The Civil Grand Jury saw private commuications to various administration officials and
senior
members of the Jamaican parliament, without response.
The Civil Grand Jury gathered data about the level of human rights implementation that
the Government of Jamaica is in today
The Civil Grand Jury visited numerous garrison commuities in Kingston & St. Andrew.
The Civil Grand Jury also reviewed incidents (State of Emergency,,,etc) which
endangered the public welfare and may have caused health related conditions to arise
unexpectedly.

DISCUSSION
The Civil Grand Jury investigation found the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to be the
individual responsible for the implementation of Jamaicas foreign policy, the
management of Jamaicas international relations and the promotion of its interests
overseas.
The Ministry (Corporate Entity) is committed to promoting friendship and cooperation
between Jamaica and other countries (Goverment Corporations) around the modern
world of social democracy (political choices), through political and diplomatic channels,
for the maintainenc of international peace and security under international law.

KINGDOM OF DEBRE ZEIT'S CIVIL GRAND JURY

2015/2016 (filed January 13, 2016)
The memorandum of understanding to the Jamaica Constabulary Force and Jamaica

Defence Force are in mutual agreement with the UDHR and the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations and Diplomatic Intercourse. This is in addition to the existing
international treaties (International Bill of Human Rights) that protect the international
rights of the individual diplomatically.
In a review of the Charter of the United Nations article 8, the Civil Grand Jury found that
the United Nations do not DISCRIMINTE against men or women from serving in any
capacity they so choose.
Furthermore, under the UDHR article 21.3, the will of the people shall be the basis of all
authority of government, the Civil Grand Jury found evidence of political malpractice
(Negligence) by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Corporate Entity), when it (Ministry)
Neglected to respond to several lawful human rights protests and demonstrations seeking
acountability from the Minister himself.
.
FACTS AND FINDINGS
Fact: The Government of Jamaica (legal fiction) is a signatory member of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights charter of fundamental equality for all human beings alike.
Fact: The Government of Jamaica has a TERRIBLE human rights record on its own
accord
Fact: No one Voted for the governor general to rule (USURP HUMAN RIGHTS) in the
interest of a defacto queen, nor indoctrinate Jamiaca with Jesuit Supremacy (Unequal
ideals)

Finding 01: The penalty for violating international law is life in prison, or death by
execution.
Therefore, the investigation came to the conclusion that mutual cooperation in peaceful
negitiations would do wonders, rather than risk a guilty verdict at the International
Criminal Court of Justice for rogue political officials who stall and ponder.

RECOMMENDATION
The 2015/2016 Kingdom of Debre Zeit's Civil Grand Jury recommends that the Prime
Minister of Jamaica sign and ratify the voice of te people's Kristological PEACE
TREATY immediately, which:
Ecclesiastically protects the universal human rights (DIPLOMATIC PRIVILEGES) of
the individual in our modern world of social democracy, while maintaining/ensuring a
safe and secure international economic order for the whole human race. The treaty
exemplifies the political, intellectual, monetary and ecclesiastical rights of the individual,
and is the foundation of a debt free global resource based economy for equal human
beings.

REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 is an international treaty that
defines a framework for diplomatic relations between independent countries
(Government Corporations).
It specifies the privileges of a diplomatic mission that enable public & private diplomats
to perform their function without fear of Jesuit (State) coercion or harassment by the host
country (GOJ). This forms the legal (public) and lawful (private) basis for diplomatic
immunity under international law. Its articles are considered a cornerstone of modern
international relations.

KINGDOM OF DEBRE ZEIT'S CIVIL GRAND JURY

2014/2015 (filed January 13, 2016)
This international Civil Grand Jury report will be lawfully published at the United
Nations treaty organization for more transparency and open accountability with the
current administration of the Jamaican government, as a means to acknowledge if it can
fulfill its own treaty obligations in our international community.
Furthermore, since no corporate fiction (Government Service Corporation) can operate
without the intelligence of human beings, exclusive details, are made as follows, in the
manner of which such human rights violations are occuring repeatedly:
(a) As to each civil grand jury finding, the responding person (AJ NICHOLSON) or
entity (MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS & TRADE) shall indicate one of the
following:
(1) The respondent agrees with the finding
(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the
response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an
explanation of the reasons therefor by personal affidavit.
(b) As to each civil grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall
report the following actions:
(1) The recommendation that has been implemented, with a summary regarding the
implemented action taken.

Optional Protocol concerning the Compulsory

Settlement of Disputes
Done at Vienna on 18 April 1961

The States Parties to the present Protocol and to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations, hereinafter referred to as the Convention, adopted by the United Nations
Conference held at Vienna from 2 March to 14 April 1961,
Expressing their wish to resort in all matters concerning them in respect of any dispute
arising out of the interpretation or application of the Convention to the compulsory
jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, unless some other form of settlement has
been agreed upon by the parties within a reasonable period,
Have agreed as follows:
Article I
Disputes arising out of the interpretation (SOCIAL) or application
(JURISDICTIONAL) of the Convention shall lie within the compulsory jurisdiction of
the International Court of Justice and may accordingly be brought before the Court by an
application made by any party to the dispute being a Party to the present Protocol.

Peaceful Settlement of International

Dispute (claim) for Article 25 the
exclusive international human right
(diplomatic privilege) to the HIGHEST
standard of living and health!
Charter of the United Nations states;
Article 35.2 - A state (political entity) which is not a Member of the
United Nations may bring to the attention of the Security Council or of
the General Assembly, ANY dispute (lawful claim) to which it is a
party, if it accepts in advance, for the purposes of the dispute, the
obligations of pacific settlement provided in the present Charter.
Article 36.2 - The Security Council should take into consideration ANY
procedures for the settlement of the dispute (lawful claim) which
have already been adopted (Kristological PEACE TREATY) by the
parties
The primary function of the United Nations (193 member nation
states) is to maintain world peace. The goals of promoting
international peace and diplomatic security are mentioned first in the
Charter, and peaceful settlements of disputes is also first and
fundamental among the means for goal attainment.
By developing friendly relations among nations (groups of likeminded individuals), we harmonize our political actions under

international law, by taking appropriate measures to strengthen

universal peace, practicing tolerance and living together in peace, so
that we may reinforce the desire for avoiding political war (civil
unrest).
Peaceful settlement require a spirit (intelligence) of cooperation and
compromise among national states (political entities), but any other
course holds little promise for survival in an interdependent modern
world of states (political entities) with nuclear capability.
The charter provides a logical progression of steps to be followed by
states (political entities) involved in disputes.
Charter Procedures and Methods
If the dispute is not so resolved, then a party to the dispute or any
member of the United Nations or the Secretary General may bring the
matter to the attention of the Security Council or of the General
Assembly.
The assumption was originally made that the Security Council would, in
most case, be the referee since the primary responsibility for the
maintenance of international peace and security was lodged in the
council. When a dispute does come before the Security Council, that
bodys first and simplest option is to suggest to the disputants that
they settle their dispute by one of the means of peaceful settlement
listed above..
Our Noble intentions are to ascend to the Manila Declaration on the
Peaceful Settlements of International Disputes, along with the Pacific
Settlements of Disputes under Article 33 of the Charter of the United
Nations, and
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution 377 A,
[1]
the "Uniting for Peace" resolution, states that in any cases where
the Security Council, because of a lack of unanimity amongst its five
permanent members, fails to act as required to maintain international
peace and security, the General Assembly shall consider the matter
immediately and may issue any recommendations it deems
necessary in order to restore international peace and diplomatic
security. If not in session at the time, the General Assembly may meet
using the mechanism of the emergency special session.
International security is the capability of a country to protect its core
values, both in terms that a state (political entity) need not sacrifice
core values in avoiding (political) war and can maintain them by
winning (political) war

Convention on Peaceful Settlement of

Disputes between States (political
entities)
Excerpt from Preamble;
Bearing in mind the importance of maintaining and strengthening
international peace and security and the development of friendly
relations among States, irrespective of their political, economic and
social systems or levels of economic development,
Reaffirming the principle of equal rights and self-determination of
peoples as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and referred
to in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning
Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with
the Charter of the United Nations and in other relevant resolutions of
the General Assembly,
Stressing the need for all States to desist from any forcible action
which deprives peoples, particularly peoples under colonial and racist
Jesuit regimes or other forms of alien domination (IMF globalization),
of their inalienable right to self-determination, freedom and
independence, as referred to in the Declaration on Principles of
International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation
among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,
Mindful of existing international instruments as well as respective
principles and rules concerning the peaceful settlement of international
disputes, including the exhaustion of local remedies whenever
applicable,
Determined to promote international co-operation in the political field
and to encourage the progressive development of international law
and its codification, particularly in relation to the peaceful settlement
of international disputes,
Solemnly declares that:
Article 1
1. All States shall act in good faith and in conformity with the
purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations
with a view to avoiding disputes among themselves likely to affect
friendly relations among States (political entities), thus contributing
to the maintenance of international peace and diplomatic security.
They shall live together in peace with one another as good neighbours
and strive for the adoption of meaningful measures for strengthening

international peace and diplomatic security.