Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
OBJECTIVE
To find out the standing balance performance among osteoarthritis of
knee patients compared with normal age matched controls
STUDY DESIGN
Descriptive study
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
Non Probability convenient sampling
SETTING
Department of physiotherapy,
A.C.S. General Hospital,
Chennai.
SUBJECT
20 osteoarthritis patients and 20 normal were taken for this study.
METHOD
To asses the balance performance functional research test were
administered to both osteoarthritis patients and control groups
RESULTS
Functional reach test score value, which is higher for control group
compared with osteoarthritis patients.
CONCLUSION
The results suggests that osteoarthritis of knee patients having significant
loss of (propioception) balance performance compared with normal age matched
controls.
1
INTRODUCTION
Osteoarthritis is a heterogeneous condition for which the prevalence, risk
factors, clinical manifestation, and prognosis vary according to the joints
affected. It most commonly affects knee, hips, hand and spinal apophyseal joints.
It is characterized by the focal areas of damage to the cartilage surfaces of the
synovial joints and is associated with remodeling of the underlying bone and
mild synovitis1.
Effective control of balance thus relives not only on account sensory input
but also on timely response of strong muscles. Balance is an integral component
of activities of daily living. Balance impairments are associated with an
increased risk of falls and poorer mobility in the elderly population3.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AN OVERVIEW
CAUSES OF OSTEOARTHRITIS
Over weight in the main cause
Harmful stress upon the knee
CLINICAL FEATURES
Pain
Muscle spasm
Stiffness
Loss of movement
Joint enlargement
Deformity
Crepitus
Loss of function
Heat.
Redness.
Swelling.
4
Pain.
PAIN
The onset is of low intensity and can be described as three types.
1. Pain on weight bearing, severe aching, due to stress on the synovial
membrane and later due to the bone surfaces, which are rich in nerve
endings, coming into contact.
2. During and after exercise there is pain described as being around the
joint.
3. AT night especially after a very active day there is severe aching.
NATURE OF PAIN
1.
2.
3.
MUSCLE SPASM
This occurs over one aspect of the joint and is initially protective but
where it remains beyond the acute episode it must be treated to prevent
contractures.
STIFFNESS
This is present after rest and takes a little time to wear off with
movement. It may be due to loss of joint lubrication, chronic oedema in the
periarticular structures or swelling of the articular cartilage.
JOINT ENLARGEMENT
Chronic oedema of the synovial membrane and capsule together with
muscle wasting makes the joint appear large.
DEFORMITY
Each joint tends to adopt a characteristic deformity.
CREPITUS
The flaked cartilage and eburnated bone ends grate with a characteristic
sound on movement.
LOSS OF FUNCTION
Pain, muscle, weakness, giving way lead to inability to use the limb
normally and can be severely disabling.
Pain is described as round and through the joint. And may be referred up
the anterior aspect of the tight or down to the ankle. Muscle spasm may be
present in the hamstring muscles. Deformity from prolonged hamstring spasm is
flexion and there is deformation of the tibia with valgus deformity. The joint is
enlarged and there is quadriceps atrophy especially vastus medialis. There is a
limp due to pain and a tendency for the joint to give way especially during
stepping down.
PATHOLOGY
5. Ligaments
6. Muscles
1. ARTICULAR CARTILAGE
Erosion occurs, often central and frequently in the weight- bearing areas.
Cartilage is usually the first structure to be affected. Fibrillation which cause
softening, splitting and fragmentation of the cartilage occurs in both weight
bearing and non weight bearing areas.
Collagen fibres split and there is disorganization of the proteoglycancollagen relationship such that water is attracted into the cartilage which causes
further softening and flaking flakes of cartilage break off and may be impacted
between the join surfaces causing locking and inflammation. Proliferation occurs
at the periphery of the cartilage.
2. BONE
Eburnation the bone surfaces become hard and polished as there is loss
of protection from the cartilage
3. SYNOVIAL MEMBRANE
This undergoes hypertrophy and becomes oedematour. Later there is
fibrour degeneration. Reduction of synovial fluid secretion results in loss of
nutrition and lubrication of the articular cartilage.
4. LIGAMENTS
This undergo the same changes as the capsule and according to the aspect
of the joint become contracted or elongated.
5. CAPSULE
This undergoes fibrous degeneration and there are low grade chronic
inflammatory changes.
6. MUSCLE
These undergo atrophy which may be related to disuse because pain limits
movement and function. Without adequate exercise the muscles may undergo
fibrous atrophy.
9
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
11
WILLIAMS
&
WILKINS
2002,
concludes
proprioception
and
D.V. DOYLE, DJ HART, Sept., 1994 concludes over one of middle aged
women with unilateral knee OA will progress to bilateral knee OA within
2 years. Obesity is a strong and important risk factor in the primary and
secondary prevention of OA knee.
12
METHODOLOGY
STUDY DESIGN
The design of the study is Descriptive study.
SETTING
Department of Physiotherapy,
A.C.S General Hospital, Chennai
SAMPLE
20 osteoarthritis Patients
20 controll Subjects
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Non probability convenient sampling
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Age between (45-65years)
Patient Body mass index (BMI) value between (25-30) Kg/m2
The patient who has diagnosed osteoarthritis of knee from orthopedic
department of A.C.S. General Hospital, Chennai.
13
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
H/o injuries and multiple falls
Uncorrected visual impairments
H/o stroke and cerebellar disorder
H/o hospitalization in last two months
14
METHOD:
To perform the functional reach test subjects stand with feet shoulder
distance apart and with the arm raised to 900 flexion without moving their feet,
subjects reach as for forward as they can, while still maintaining their balance.
The measuring scale is placed on the wall.
SAMPLE
The sample consists of 20 Osteoarthritis, patients and 20 control subjects.
15
16
17
TABLE -1
FUNCTIONAL REACH SCORES OF MALE SUBJECTS (45-65 YRS)
OA KNEE
11.2
10.5
9.5
10.4
11
8.9
9.3
10.6
8.5
9.2
CONTROL
16.3
15.6
15.2
16
17
14.8
15.6
16.8
16.5
16.7
18
19
TABLE 2 (MALES)
BETWEEN GROUP ANALYSIS USING PAIRED T-TEST FOR MALES
OA KNEE
CONTROL
SIGNIFICANT
16.05
Mean
9.91
Mean
(p <0.001)
SD
0.9409
S.D
0.7337
RESULTS:
Table 2 shows the value of mean and S.D functional reach test score
between OA knee patients and control subjects. For OA patients mean value is
9.91 and standard deviation (S.D) 0.9409. For control subjects mean value 16.05
and S.D 0.7337. In order to find out the level of significance. I used paired Ttest. The results shows that level of significance p value <0.001.
20
BAR DIAGRAM
21
TABLE 3
FUNCTIONAL REACH SCORES OF FEMALE SUBJECTS (45-65YRS)
OA KNEE
9.3
8.5
9.4
10.5
8.9
9.2
10.1
9.5
8.5
10.2
CONTROL
14.6
13.3
12.6
14.5
13.3
14
14.2
12.5
13.9
14.5
TABLE 4 (FEMALES)
BETWEEN GROUP ANALYSIS OF FEMALE USING PAIRED T-TEST
OA KNEE
CONTROL
22
SIGNIFICANT
Mean
9.4
Mean
13.74
(p <0.005)
SD
0.688
S.D
0.7763
RESULTS:
Table 4 shows the value of mean and standard deviation of functional
reach test score between OA patients and control subjects. For OA patients mean
value 9.4 and SD 0.688. For control subjects mean value 13.74 and SD 0.7763.
In order to find out the level of significance I used paired t-test. The results
shows that the level of significance p-value < 0.005.
23
BAR DIAGRAM
24
DISCUSSION
The aim of this study is to identify the standing balance performance
between OA knee patients and age matched normal controls.
Table -1 Shows that value of functional reach test score for male. The
value of functional reach score which is high for control subjects compared with
AO patients.
Table 2 shows the value of mean and S.D functional reach test score
between OA knee patients and control subjects. For OA patients mean value is
9.91 and standard deviation (S.D) 0.9409. For control subjects mean value 16.05
and S.D 0.7337. In order to find out the level of significance. I used paired Ttest. The results shows that level of significance p value <0.001.
Table 3 Shows that the value of functional reach test score for female.
The value of functional reach test score which is high for control subjects
compared with OA patients.
25
In order to find out the level of significance I used paired t-test. The results
shows that the level of significance p-value < 0.005.
HASSON11 et-all 2001 June concluded compared with age sex mateched
controls, subjects with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis have quadriceps
weakness reduced knee proprioception and increased postural way.
PAI Y.C.6 et-all 2005 concludes proprioception declines with age and is
further impaired in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis poor proprioception
may contribute to functional impairment in osteoarthritis.
26
CONCLUSION
27
RECOMMENDATION
28
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Tidys physiotherapy 4th Edition Page No. 107-109 Author TIDYS and
THOMSON.
2. Orthropaedics and Traumatology 6th Edition Author - NATARAJAN
3. Motor control theory and practical applications Page No.208-209 Author
ANNE SHUMWAY, MARJORIE WOOILACOTT
4. Effects of kinesthesia and balance exercises in knee ostheoarthristis
2005 Dec., DIRACOGLU .D, AYDIN. R
5. Effects of age and osteoarthritis on knee propriception 12th Dec., 2005
PAI.Y.C
6. Impaired proprioception and osteoarthritis 1997 May SHARMA .L,
PAI.Y.C
7. Is knee joint proprioception worse in the arthritic knee versus the
unaffected knee in unilateral knee osteoarthritis 1997 August- HOLT
KAMP .K,
RYMER WZ
30
APPENDIX I
PROFORMA
Name
: __________________________
Age
: ________
Sex
: ________
Occupation
: __________________________
Height (Cms)
: ________
Weight(kgs)
: ________
BMI
: ________
Group
: Control / Experimental
FRT Score
31
APPENDIX II
DATA I
FUNCTIONAL REACH TEST SCORE
S.No.
OA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PATIENTS
11.2
10.5
9.5
10.4
11.0
8.9
9.3
10.6
8.5
9.2
BMI
CONTROL
BMI
27
30
28
29
25
26
28
27
30
25
GROUP
16.3
15.6
15.2
16.0
17.0
14.8
15.6
16.8
16.5
16.7
25
29
27
28
29
25
27
25
29
28
32
DATA II
FUNCTIONAL REACH TEST SCORE
S.No.
OA
BMI
CONTROL
BMI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PATIENTS
9.3
8.5
9.4
10.5
8.9
9.2
10.1
9.5
8.5
10.2
28
29
30
26
29
25
27
28
28
26
GROUP
14.6
13.3
12.6
14.5
13.3
14.0
14.2
12.5
13.9
14.5
27
30
28
27
30
27
25
29
26
28
33