Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
ABSTRACT
Automobiles and trucks have shock absorbers to damp out
the vibration experienced due to roughness of the roads.
However, energy in conventional shock absorbers gets
dissipated as heat and not used in any way. Regenerative
electromagnetic shock absorbers provide means for
recovering the energy dissipated in shock absorbers.
Electromagnetic shock absorbers for potential use in
vehicles are fabricated and tested for their performance.
NOMENCLATURE
Bi = Magnetic flux in tesla
f
= Frequency in Hz
F = Force in N
h = Height of pole ring in mm
I
= Current in amp
K = Constant (nhBi) in volt-s/m
L = Length in mm
n = Number of turns / mm
P = Power generated in watts
Rc = Total resistance of coils in ohms
Rl = Resistance of external load in ohms
v
= Velocity in m/s
V = Voltage in volt
INTRODUCTION
Goldner et. al [1] proposed electromagnetic shock absorbers
to transform the energy dissipated in shock absorbers into
electrical power. Gupta [2] has studied the available energy
from shock absorbers as cars and trucks are driven over
various types of roads. Graves et. al [3] studied
electromagnetic regenerative damping. They mention that
energy regeneration is small and may be relevant only for
electric vehicles. They also propose ways to amplify the
motion of the shock in order to increase recoverable energy
which on the other hand may have a negative effect on
vehicle dynamics. Another interesting observation made by
them is that device output voltage must be large enough to
overcome the barrier potential of the storage device.
flux through the two end pole rings is about half that in the
interior pole rings. For purposes of estimating performance,
a 1 Tesla (T) radial flux density is assumed to emanate from
the interior pole rings and 0.5 T from the end rings.
The coil assembly consists of an inner coil surrounded
concentrically by a larger diameter outer coil. Each coil
consists of four continuously wound layers of #25 magnet
wire with approximately 800 turns. However, each coil is
broken into four sections, separated by insulators. In
assembly, each coil section is centered on a different iron
pole ring. The winding direction is reversed in adjacent
section of each coil to accommodate the reversal in radial
flux of adjacent pole rings. In other words, the induced
voltage in each section of the coil has the same polarity.
Voltage Generation
To first order, the magnetic flux from the magnet assembly
radially penetrates each coil section over the height of the
pole ring, h = 10 mm. Thus, for coils with n = 8.26 turns/mm
moving axially with a velocity v past a stationary pole
emanating flux density, Bi, a voltage,
V = n h v Bi,
(5)
(1)
(2)
Damping Force
When a straight wire of length L(m) conducts a current, I(A),
and is subject to a magnetic field, Bi(T), normal to the wire, a
force, F(N), is exerted on the wire of magnitude
F = I L Bi
(3)
The direction of the force is normal to the wire and field. The
damping force developed on the coil assembly of the EM
shock is the sum of the forces exerted on each section, i, of
the coil, and (3) is applicable because of the coil geometry
and the radial directions of the flux. Already, L = n h and
Bi = 0.5 T or 1 T are known for each section of the coils.
The current I will be the same in all sections of the coils, but
its magnitude depends on the impedance of the coil and the
external load.
For the frequency range of interest, 0<f<100 Hz, the
inductive reactances of the EM coils are negligible in
comparison to its resistance. The resistance of the inner coil
is 9 ohms and the outer coil has a resistance of 22 ohms, for
a total of Rc = 31 ohms. By combining (2) and (3) for every
section of the coils, the total damping force is
2
F = K v / (Rl + Rc)
(4)
Frequency
in Hz
10
Velocity
in mm/sec
110.38
Displacement
in mm
1.757
Power Generated
in watts
0.2878
11
100.35
1.452
2.276
0.1570
12
91.99
1.22
2.09
0.1324
15
73.59
0.781
1.47
0.0655
20
55.19
0.439
1.333
0.0538
30
36.79
0.195
0.883
0.0236
40
27.60
0.11
0.673
0.0137
50
22.08
0.07
0.553
0.0093
60
18.40
0.049
0.475
0.0068
70
15.77
0.036
0.417
0.0053
80
13.80
0.027
0.372
0.0042
90
12.26
0.022
0.34
0.0035
100
11.04
0.018
0.31
0.0029
Power in watts
0.3500
0.3000
0.2500
0.2000
0.1500
0.1000
0.0500
0.0000
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
Velocity in mm/sec
120.00
Predicted
Voltage
0.69
3.44
Measured
Voltage
0.707
2.52
Predicted Power
in watts
0.0038
0.095
Measured Power
in watts
0.003
0.054
References
1. Goldner, R.B., Zerigian, P., and Hull, J.R., A Preliminary
Study of Energy Recovery in Vehicles by Using
Regenerative Magnetic Shock Absorbers, SAE
Transactions J. Commercial Vehicles, Vol. 110. 2001,
pp. 53-59.
2. Gupta, A., Various internal communications with Argonne
National Laboratory.
3. Graves, K.E., Iovenitti, P.G., and Toneich, D., Electronic
Regenerative Damping in Vehicle Suspension Systems,
International Journal of Vehicle Designs, Vol. 24, Nos. 2/3,
2000, pp. 182-197.
4. Suda, Y. and Shiba, T., A New Hybrid Suspension
System with Active Control and Energy Regeneration,
Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement, Vol. 25, 1996, pp.
641-654.
5. Fodor, M.G., and Redfield, R., The Variable Linear
Transmissions for Regenerative Damping in Vehicle
Suspension Control, Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 22,
1993, pp. 1-20.
6. Karnopp, D., Permanent Magnet Linear Motors Used as
Variable Mechanical Dampers for Vehicle Suspensions,
Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 18, 1989, pp. 187-200.