Human Rights: Respond to Climate Change

by Eric Luther D. Calunnag

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its 5th
Assessment Report in year 2014 confirmed that climate change is real and
that human-made greenhouse gas emissions are its primary cause. The
report identified the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and
natural

disasters,

rising

sea-levels,

floods,

heat

waves,

droughts,

desertification, water shortages, and the spread of tropical and vector-borne
diseases as some of the adverse impacts of climate change.
Human rights obligations apply to the goals and commitments of
States in the area of climate change and require that climate actions should
focus on protecting the rights of those most vulnerable to climate change.
Human rights principles articulated in the Declaration on the Right to
Development and other instruments call for such climate action to be both
individual and collective and for it to benefit the most vulnerable. The
UNFCCC further elaborates upon the need for equitable climate action calling
for States to address climate change in accordance with their common, but
differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities in order to benefit
present and future generations (OHCHR,2015).

It is not only States that must be held accountable for their contributions to climate change but also businesses which have the responsibility to respect human rights and do no harm in the course of their activities. and be transparent in the manner in which such plans are . States should make their adaptation and mitigation plans publicly available. Such an approach should be part of any climate change adaptation or mitigation measures. will promote consistency. resettlement schemes and others. Only by integrating human rights in climate actions and policies and empowering people to participate in policy formulation can States promote sustainability and ensure the accountability of all duty-bearers for their actions. without discrimination. forest conservation or tree-planting projects. while also rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. States should cooperate to address the global effects of climate change on the enjoyment of human rights around the world in a manner that emphasizes climate justice and equity. including financial. This. to realise low-carbon. climate-resilient. and sustainable development. A human rights-based approach also calls for accountability and transparency. in turn. in the design and implementation of these projects. Affected individuals and communities must participate. technological and capacity-building support. policy coherence and the enjoyment of all human rights.Existing State commitments require international cooperation. such as the promotion of alternative energy sources.

the median projection of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is that the sea level will rise about two feet figure that . protect. 2014). climate change and its impacts.developed and financed. Since climate change mitigation and adaptation measures can have human rights impacts. While no one anticipates that this complete melting could happen in this century. will be essential for successful rights-based climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts.. Accurate and transparent measurements of greenhouse gas emissions. researchers estimated that a four-foot rise in sea level by the end of the century would mean that nearly five percent of the worldÕs population would be subject to annual flooding (Hinkel et al. Because of the impacts of climate change on human rights. protect and fulfil human rights for all. Greenland and Antarctica contain enough ice to cause nearly 400 feet of sea level rise if it all were to melt. States must effectively address climate change in order to honour their commitment to respect. including human rights impacts. The rise in sea level is largely due to the expansion of water and the melting of glaciers on land. although human activity that leads to land subsidence also contributes to coastal flooding. In a recent paper for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. all climate change-related actions must also respect. promote and fulfil human rights standards.

during the Pliocene epoch the time period between about 5. while average global temperatures were only about three to four degrees Celsius warmer.may be too conservative. Nor can scientists predict precisely when the West Antarctic Ice Sheet might collapse.6 million years ago sea levels were about 100 feet higher than they are today. 2009). some scientists have accused the IPCC of being reticent (Hansen. Given that the understanding of land ice dynamics is still relatively undeveloped. 2007) on the issue of sea level rise (Smith et al. as paleoclimate records suggest that there could be much higher average sea levels. how quickly the vertical shafts within glaciers in Greenland will carry meltwater from the surface down to the underlying rock effectively greasing the way for glaciers to be transported more swiftly into the sea.. or how warming ocean currents could accelerate such a change. And yet abrupt climatic change could theoretically help to cause the seas to rise tens of feet by the century end. These and other feedback loops in the climate system remain poorly understood.3 million to 2. there has been virtually no acknowledgement by the major emitters that they have caused tens to hundreds of millions of people . Because of these concerns. for example. no one can say. The IPCC is not alone in this foot-dragging. For example. although most climatologists project it would be in the range of three to six feet.

2009). rising sea levels cause wells to be flooded with saltwater. where most of the affected live. In developing countries. Consequently. but also for the residents of many low-lying delta regions. even rich countries that can afford these expensive technological fixes find that they are not fully protective. and more intense storms to strike. more frequent and deeper floods to occur. many coastal regions of the world could become difficult. Long before there is complete permanent submersion. all of which render large swathes of land unfit for human life and activities. shoreline homes to wash away. even when there is less than two feet of sea level rise. This is true not just for the people living on small islands. Realistically.to be at permanent risk of losing their homes and possibly their countries by the end of the 21st century. their economies are still emerging. coastlines to erode. A foretaste of these presubmersion effects can already be seen in the Pacific islands and in low-lying deltas such as the Ganges and the Brahmaputra (CARE International. In addition. if not impossible. the dire consequences of sea level rise are not limited to just the physical act of water covering the land on which one lives. they cannot build dikes or seawalls or floating cities and in any case. to inhabit. and there is not much technological infrastructure. . people are poor. Given this situation.

Such fortress worlds promote even stricter migration policies toward affected neighbors. 2010). 2010). concerns about the arrival of a large number of climate exiles or boat people knocking on their doors has driven some countries to build even stronger borders. existing international law provides no help for these individuals. it is imperative that these developing countries be compensated for their losses by the rest of the international community (Byravan and Rajan. it is likely that an influx of new citizens. with their talents and skills. migration and permanent resettlement would seem to be the only possible adaptation strategies available for the millions of people whose countries and 25 lives are at extreme risk (Byravan and Rajan.plus their extreme vulnerability and the minuscule contribution of developing countries to the problem of climate change. designed to protect those . Unfortunately. and it is the duty of those responsible to recognize this fact and provide assistance. Unfortunately. While assistance in combatting sea level rise could take several forms. since climate exiles are hardly responsible for their plight. the closest legal mechanism is the 1954 Refugee Convention. I posit that such fortresses are unethical. In addition. would generate net economic benefits for host countries particularly those with declining birthrates and legal immigration would provide a prudent longterm answer to tensions relating to international refugee crises.

and began to get more visibility after the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change held its conference in Poznan. advocacy groups that worked on issues of migration. special right of free global movement and resettlement in regions and countries on higher ground. which has received support from other developing countries (UNFCCC. Until quite recently. at present those forced to move due to environmental or climate reasons cannot be referred to as refugees. The idea is rooted in the principles of state responsibility under international law. The only just remedy to the climate driven migration problem would seem to be the development of a new. a legal concept originally introduced through the Association of Small Island States and Bangladesh. in advance of actual disaster. Some of this could fall under the rubric of Loss and Damage. Poland. 2008). and was further reinforced after the Cancun Climate Change Conference of 2010. and relocation including Oxfam and World Vision considered the problems related to poor countries suffering damage from climate change mostly as a human rights concern.forced to flee their homes as a result of war or persecution. human settlement. While this is an important approach and acknowledges that there is a positive duty to help . Legally speaking. likewise with recent Meeting in Paris this November 2015.

In policy terms. In other words. it is important to recognize that climate exiles are a special category of international migrants who need protection of an even stronger sort than that given to other refugees. unlike most other types of statelessness. those countries that have historically been large emitters have contributed the most to the burden of greenhouse gas stocks in the atmosphere and therefore have a special responsibility to make proportionate amends to those who are experiencing destruction from global warming. while providing support to climate exiles as a charitable effort to assist people in harms way is certainly necessary. cf.people who are suffering. it does not grapple with the responsibility that rich countries have toward poor countries for occupying their global development space and causing them harm through the effects of global warming. They will therefore need special protection in terms of being . since the original state and its territory either no longer exist or will be rendered largely unviable for all practical purposes. They are stateless persons who are either already or soon will be stripped of rights but what is exceptional about them is that theirs will be a permanent condition. 2005). rich countries have an obligation toward poor countries as a consequence of the cumulative burden of greenhouse gas concentrations they have contributed to in the past (Byravan and Rajan. 2010. Pogge.

there could be several ways to determine who should be . This could mean that climate exiles need to be recognized as such and given special status. Such a mechanism. political. would be a fair way of addressing the problems faced by climate exiles and offer a modicum of climate justice. Accordingly. Under the proposed framework.provided civil. there should be a mechanism in which these exiles would be given accelerated immigration benefits. people living in areas likely to be obliterated or rendered uninhabitable would be provided the option of early migration after having received some training and skills to be prepared to be full citizens of host countries. One way this could take place would be by including the millions of people who live on small islands in the existing immigration quotas of rich countries who are the most responsible for the cumulative effects of greenhouse gases in the first place based on the 26 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71(2). Once the basic principle is accepted. typically by becoming full citizens in countries away from their original homes. either through a new international treaty or through some framework of regional and international cooperation. Thus. host countries could demonstrate their commitment to climate justice and provide a pragmatic solution to the problem. operating in advance of climate-induced disaster. and economic rights.

For instance. subsequent international treaties would be necessary to seal these relationships and provide formal ways of sharing the financial costs associated with putting them into effect. Similar efforts could be led by Australia in the Indian Ocean and parts of the Pacific. because of the synergies they generate for peace and prosperity among neighbors. and what institutional and political mechanisms should be established to minimize the risk of a massive refugee crisis as climate impacts become more severe. Even here. There are other approaches as well. India could take the lead in promoting an agreement for phased migration to India and other countries in the region over the course of this century. Large countries that are themselves not at risk could take the initiative in these processes. therefore. regions experience . For instance.considered for immigration benefits. In many cases. regional agreements could identify potential hosts for their more vulnerable neighbors without having to wait for international negotiations to provide a solution. Regional agreements are more important than experts and negotiators usually recognize. and by China and the United States for the Americas and island regions within their respective spheres of influence. which countries should bear the costs of immigration. the Maldives and Bangladesh face the greatest danger of obliteration in the South Asian region.

becoming nearly irrelevant in the current negotiations. stressing common but differentiated responsibility. are almost always viewed through the lens of a national security threat.the same climatic disaster events such as cyclones and floods. there are many opportunities to be explored regarding new regional policies on labor. much more needs to be done. but unfortunately that concept has been eroded bit by bit in recent years. In South Asia. for example. migration. the same cannot be said of the other countries around India. Article 3.1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. the legal concepts of Loss and Damage and . While there appears to be some acknowledgement of the challenge climate exiles within the international community. Similarly. has been one of the core principles behind the concept that wealthier nations would contribute more to resettlement efforts. and share similar weather-related systems (such as monsoons and melting glaciers) and comparable cultural features and histories. however. unfortunately. In light of crossborder migration pressure from climate change andweather-related disasters. while India and Nepal have a relatively relaxed policy on movement between countries. and that could be a big challenge. and adaptation. The issues related to cross-border migration. But not all regional neighbors have neighborly relationships.

Challenges that the world have to deal with in the coming centuries. Available at: http://papers.com/sol3/papers. References: Byravan S and Rajan SC (2006) Providing new homes for climate change exiles. Available abstract_id¼1129346.ssrn.cfm? . Everyone is called up to respond to the challenge of Climate Change and to promote Human Rights in test of Nature. Adjusting to living in a warmer world and reducing the greenhouse gas emissions responsible for global warming are dual responsibilities.ssrn. Climate Policy 6: 247”252. shared by all.other initiatives could fall by the wayside in their usefulness for vulnerable populations unless these are fortified through legal protection and regional cooperation.cfm?abstract_id¼950329.com/sol3/papers. Byravan S and Rajan SC (2008) The social impacts of climate change in South Asia. at: http://papers.

org/2010/the-ethicalimplications-of-sea-level-risedue-to-climate-change-abstract/.ethicsandinternationalaffairs. Sudhir Chella (2015) Sea level rise and climate change exiles: A possible solution.org/files/reports/CARE_In_Search_of_Shelter. CARE International (2009) In search of shelter: Mapping the effects of climate change on human migration and displacement. 71 Issue 2. 1 Graph. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Vol. Mar2015. 8p. Available at: http://www. p21-28. Environmental Research Letters . Hansen JE (2007) Scientific reticence and sea level rise. Ethics & International Affairs 24(3): 239”260.pd f. Available at: http:// www.Byravan S and Rajan SC (2010) The ethical implications of sea-level rise due to climate change. Sujatha Rajan. Byravan.careclimatechange.

Vafeidis AT.org/content/111/9/3292. Hinkel J. (2014) Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) 2014 Available at: http://www. Available at: http://iopscience. et al. Available at: http://www. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(9): 3292”3297.org/1748-9326/ 2/2/024002/. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.ch/activities/activities.pnas.iop.2(2): 024002. . Lincke D. Human Rights and Climate Change. abstract.shtml Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.ipcc.

1747-7093.au/international/2013-09-27/pacificleaders-call-onthe-un-for-more-action-on-climate-change/1196728. Available at: http://www.aspx Pogge T (2005) World poverty and human rights. Schneider SH. Ethics & International Affairs 19(1): 1”7.radioaustralia. Radio Australia (2013) Pacific leaders call on the UN for more action on climate change.1111/ j. Available at: http://onlinelibrary. (2009) Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reasons for concern.x/abstract.wiley.net.org/EN/Issues/HRAndClimateChange /Pages/HRClimateChangeIndex.2015. Smith JB. September 27.ohchr.tb00484.com/doi/10.Available at: http://www.2005. Oppenheimer M et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences .

abstract.pnas. Available at: http://unfccc.org/content/106/11/4133.int/adaptation/workstreams/loss _and _damage/items/6056. .106(11):4133”4137. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2008) Approaches to address loss and damage associated with climate change impacts in developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.Available at :http://www.php.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful