Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Makram Al-Waiz, M.B., Ch.B., Riad Ayesh, M.R.C.P., Stephen C. Mitchell, Ph.D.,
Jeffrey R. Idle, Ph.D., and R. L. Smith, D.Sc. London, England
Trimethylamine (N,N-dimethylmethanamine) (TMA)
is a volatile tertiary aliphatic amine with a pungent
ammoniacal odor. It is responsible for the characteristic
odor of rotting fish. The amine is found as such, at low
levels, in fresh marine fish but more particularly in the
form of its N-oxide (TMAO), which may reach concentrations as high as 0.5% of body weight.' Both the
free amine and its TMAO are natural components of
human urine; healthy young volunteers excrete about
1 mg TMA and 40 mg TMAO daily, although these
values are markedly influenced by diet particularly if
marine fish are eaten, When the latter are consumed
several hundred mg TMAO may be excreted.
In humans, TMA and TMAO excretion are believed
to arise from two sources. The first is the TMA and
TMAO present as such in marine fish. The second
source is via the enterobacterial metabolism of precursors such as choline present in foodstuffs such as eggs,
liver, and soybean.'
Studies on the metabolic disposition of TMA have
shown that the orally administered amine is absorbed
rapidly and metabolized almost exclusively to TMAO,
588
humans.'
However, there are a number of reports in the literature of individuals who excrete large amounts of unoxidized TMA in their urine. Such individuals may acquire a particularly characteristic and unpleasant smell
thought to be caused by the excretion of TMA in the
sweat and exhaled air. This condition was first described
by Humbert et al.' and is now referred to colloquially
as the fish-odor syndrome or, in more specific biochemical terms, as trimethylaminuria. Since 1970 about
16 further cases have been described in the literature
and there have been suggestions and observations that
the condition may well be an inherited one, but this
has never been established. 6,7
Clinical experience has suggested that this phenomenon, albeit in a milder form, may not be as rare as
the literature would indicate. Consequently, it was decided to carry out a random population study to ascertain the distribution of trimethylamine N-oxidation capacity and, having identified trimethylaminuric probands, to carry out appropriate family studies with a
view to establishing the possible genetic basis and mode
of inheritance of the phenomenon.
METHODS
Human volunteers. One hundred sixty-nine healthy
white volunteers (99 men and 70 women) were recruited
VOLUME 42
NUMBER 5
from the staff and students of St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, London. Their ages ranged between 18 and
50 years (mean - 1 SD 21.5 4.4). No subject had
any history of major organic disease and none consumed more than moderate amounts of alcohol although
36 regularly smoked cigarettes. None of the volunteers
had been exposed to any recent drug treatment and none
were taking medication at the time of the study. All of
the volunteers were asked not to eat fish for the 2 days
before the test and during the urine collection itself.
The families of two subjects in the population study
were also examined. In addition, two proband individuals who had been diagnosed previously as having trimethylaminuria (fish odor syndrome)8 were investigated together with all members of their families. All
of these additional volunteers were in good health.
Full informed consent was obtained from all the participants before entering the study and appropriate ethical approval was provided by the local ethics committee.
Experimental procedure. Each volunteer collected a
total 0 to 24-hour urine sample in a container to which
10 ml hydrochloric acid (4 mol/L) had already been
added. This ensured that any TMA excreted in the form
of its free base would be converted to the nonvolatile
hydrochloride salt. The total urine volume was recorded
and an aliquot (20 ml; pH 2.0) was stored at 20 C
until analysis, which was carried out as soon as possible.
Further investigations were undertaken on all family
members. These individuals were given 970 mg trimethylamine hydrochloride (equivalent to 600 mg
TMA free base; Aldrich Chemical Co. Ltd., Gillingham, Dorser, England) in gelatin capsules together with
a glass of water, and the following 0 to 8-hour urine
samples were collected and treated as above.
Certain precautions must be taken during the selection of volunteers because spurious high levels of free
TMA may be recorded during menstruation from the
endometrial tissue9 and in those subjects who have vaginal or urinary tract infections caused by bacterial mediated metabolism.' Such individuals were identified
and excluded from the study.
Analytic procedure. TMA in the urine was analyzed
by a modification of the head-space GC technique as
described previously in the literature."' Urine (5 ml)
and 0.2% v/v aqueous isopropylamine (100 p.A; internal standard) were placed in a 15 ml screw-top septum glass vial. Potassium carbonate (2 to 3 gm) and
potassium hydroxide (five to 10 pellets) were added to
the urine and the vials were sealed with air-tight
polytetrafluoroethylene-lined septum caps. All of these
589
RESULTS
Analysis. According to the conditions described for
the assay, the retention times obtained for TMA and
the internal standard were 1.9 and 3.2 minutes, respectively, and could be clearly resolved from other
volatile urinary components including ammonia (retention time 0.5 minute), methylamine (retention time 0.9
minute), dimethylamine (retention time 1.5 minutes),
acetone (retention time 4.0 minutes), and ethanol (retention time 4.4 minutes) ( Fig. 1). The limit of detection of TMA was 0.01 p.,g/m1 and calibration curves
for the assay were constructed in the range of 0.2 to
10 ii,g/m1 (Fig. 2). The same urine samples from three
individuals were analyzed on six separate occasions during the course of 1 week and the values obtained for
4
CONCENTRATION
(#9/m1)
6
MINUTES
TMA and total TMA levels (after N-oxide chemical reduction) were virtually the same (coefficient of variation
3.2 to 6.9). The efficiency of TMAO chemical reduction using the system described was always 98% to
99%.
Repeat analysis of urine samples from 20 subjects
after storage at 20 C for up to 6 months showed
virtually no difference. Comparison of the initial esti-
mates of TMA and TMAO with the repeat values obtained showed no significant difference (Student t test:
t = 1.01, P = 0.324; t = 0.86, P = 0.401, respectively).
Biologic reproducibility. The values obtained for the
percentage of total TMA-related material excreted as
TMAO were found to be reproducible in 24 subjects in
whom complete repeat tests were performed on two
separate occasions at least 6 months apart. When the
first estimate of the percentage of TMAO was compared
with the second estimate, the correlation coefficient
obtained was r = 0.998 and P < 0.001 (Fig. 3). In
addition, estimates were made on two subjects on five
separate occasions over a period of several months and
the values obtained for the percentage of TMAO were
virtually identical (coefficient of variation <1%) (Table I).
Interindividual variation. The results obtained for
the 169 subjects investigated are given in Table II.* The
mean values found for 0 to 24-hour urinary excretion
of TMA and TMAO (mean SD) were 20.3 20.9
Rmol (1.2 1.2 mg) and 505.6 329.7 Kmol
(38.0 24.8 mg), respectively. When the results were
plotted in the form of a histogram relating the percent
*See NAPS document No. 04527 for four pages of supplementary
material. Order from NAPS, c/o Microfiche Publications, PO Box
3513, Grand Central Station, New York, NY 10163-3513. Remit in advance, in US funds only, $7.75 for photocopies or
$4.00 for microfiche. Outside the United States and Canada,
add postage of $4.50 for the first 20 pages and $1.00 for each
of 10 pages of material thereafter, or $1.50 for microfiche
postage.
VOLUME 42
NUMBER 5
591
100
80
98
'G.
96
94
92
20
90,
20
40
60
80
100
90
94
92
95
98
100
(FIRST ESTIMATE)
% OF
AS
TMAO
Fig. 3. Biologic reproducibility of the N-oxidation of TMA; correlation of first and second estimates
of urinary TMAO excretion for 24 volunteers (A); expanded correlation scale for 20 subjects (B).
% Total TMA
excretion as
Subject
1
TMA
TMAO
TMAO
10.3
18.5
408
778.2
592.3
458
307.1
536.0
385.4
545.0
236.3
467.0
289.2
247.7
455.2
842.4
341.9
97.5
97.7
98.6
98.3
97.3
94.0
94.6
94.9
95.8
93.6
68.9
68.3
72.3
8.6
7.7
8.5
34.5
22.0
29.0
10.4
31.8
130.6
115.1
174.3
159.1
66.4
84.1
83.7
30
1.
48
24
36
16
24
12
12
60
Cm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11
90
100
()
0.2
0.33
0.4
0.5
TMA/TMAO RATIO
DISCUSSION
It can be seen from the results presented in this article
that the majority of the population excrete TMA, derived from the diet almost entirely in the form of
VOLUME 42
NUMBER 5
Family
95
98
97
76
(78)
(79)
(96)
(61)
593
97
14
441:2
(91)
95
96
84
(75)
Family B
97
(75)
(69)
Family D
98
98
(78)
(96)
76
(62)
94
99
4
95
69
94
(92)
(52)
(78)
Fig. 6. Family studies on the urinary excretion of TMA and TMAO under normal dietary conditions
and after oral challenge with TMA (600 mg). Values for the latter are shown in parentheses. All
figures refer to percent of the total urinary TMA excretion as TMAO. Affected probands are indicated
by arrowheads.
References
Shewan JM. The chemistry and metabolism of the nitrogenous extractives in fish. Biochem Soc Symp
1951;6:28-48.
Tver DF, Russell P. Nutrition and health encyclopedia.
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1981:100.
Al-Waiz M, Mitchell SC, Idle JR, Smith RL. The metabolism of '4C-labeled trimethylamine and its N-oxide
in man. Xenobiotica 1987;17:551-8.
Al-Waiz M, Mitchell SC, Idle JR, Smith RL. The relative
importance of N-oxidation and N-demethylation in the
metabolism of trimethylamine in man. Toxicology
1987;43:117-21.
Humbert JR, Hammond KB, Hathaway WE, Marcoux
JG, O'Brien D. Trimethylaminuria: the fish-odour syndrome. Lancet 1970;ii:770-1.
Brewster MA, Schedewie H. Trimethylaminuria. Ann
Clin Lab Sci 1983;13:20-4.
Spellacy E, Watts RWE, Goolamali SK. Trimethylaminuria. J Inherited Metab Dis 1979;2:85-8.
Al-Waiz M, Ayesh R, Mitchell SC, Idle JR, Smith RL.
Trimethylaminuria (fish-odour syndrome): an inborn error of oxidative metabolism. Lancet 1987;i:634-5.
Windholz M, ed. The Merck index, ed 10. Rahway, NJ:
Merck and Co, 1983:1387-8.