Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Introduction
Psychological research on human-environment relations has been conducted primarily
within the subdiscipline of environmental psychology. Such research has shown how individuals cognitions, emotions, and actions are shaped by the material settings in which
they unfold. It has also elaborated a range of concepts designed to elucidate the spatial
dimension of human experience, including place attachment, place identity, and territoriality (e.g., see Altman & Low 1992; Proshansky, Fabian & Kaminoff 1983). Recently,
this spatial dimension has increasingly engaged researchers working in the companion discipline of social psychology, who have explored, for example, how physical settings are
linked to collective processes of belonging, remembering, identification, and differentiation
(e.g., Bonaiuto, Breakwell & Cano 1996). More fundamentally, they have explored how the
very meanings we attribute to our material environments are themselves a product of social
Correspondence: Andrs Di Masso, PsicoSAO Research Group, Department of Social
Psychology, University of Barcelona, Pg. Vall dHebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail:
adimasso@ub.edu
Color versions of one or more of the figures in the article can be found online at www.
tandfonline.com/uqrp.
45
46
47
Four Perspectives
We can identify four potential approaches to the resolution of this discourse-space dualism that are implicit within the existing literature. These resolutions are rooted in research
traditions that overlap and interpenetrate one another in complex ways, including critical
psychology, cultural geography, urban studies and affect theories.
The first approach is illustrated by Macnaghtens (1993) analysis of a public inquiry
into a controversial landfill site plan. The inquiry pitted a group of developers, for whom
the planning application was framed as a business opportunity, against the county council
and community representatives, for whom it was framed as spoiling the local landscape.
Macnaghten identified the main discursive constructions of nature deployed to define the
meaning of the proposed location and explored their rhetorical functions. Most important,
he related these arguments to external constraints (i.e., power structures such as legislation),
to the disputes final outcome (i.e., the inspectors report) and to the ensuing environmental consequences (i.e., for dealing with the landfill itself). After evaluating the competing
arguments, the inspector produced a report in which a particular construction of place warranted a concrete material outcome (i.e., a physical landscape that remained unaltered).
Place-discourse, it seems, can have all-too-tangible consequences. To echo Macnaghtens
evocative phrase, words can literally move mountains.
The second approach is illustrated by Cromby and Nightingales (1999) critique of
social constructionism. If Macnaghten emphasized the material consequences of placediscoursewords can move mountainsCromby and Nightingale foregrounded the role
of embodiment, materiality, and power as extra-discursive realities that limit the nature and
consequences of practices of linguistic construction. Indeed, they proposed that materiality
is a precondition for the discursive constructions that inform everyday experience, and,
more specifically, listed the location of bodies and the organization of space as two of
these preconditions. According to this approach, talk about the material environment is
both enabled and constrained by its concrete organization, which shapes the conditions of
possibility under which particular rhetorical constructions become meaningful, plausible
and consequential. For example, a neighbourhood whose design, infrastructure and architecture divides members of particular social groups from one another or relegates some
members to marginal spaces beyond community boundaries also delimits the constructions
of place and people-place relations that can be meaningfully or coherently formulated (see
Buizer & Turnhout 2011; Di Masso 2012; Durrheim & Dixon 2005).
48
The third approach is illustrated by Deleuze-inspired studies in urban geography, building on the recent turn to affect (Clough & Halley 2007) and on what has become known as
the Non Representational Theory in cultural geography (Amin & Thrift 2002). Latham and
McCormacks (2004) discussion of the relationship between the material and the immaterial in urban experience exemplifies this approach. Here, the immaterial is conceived
as lying both beyond and before discourse: it is a set of nonrepresentational forces and
practices and processes through which matter is always coming into being (Latham &
McCormack 2004, p. 705). Advocates call this the virtual dimension of the material.
Accordingly, this approach encourages the analysis of the material not as a domain of tangible objects, but as a form of reality already penetrated by pre-reflective relational forces
constantly reshaping the urban. Hence, in experiencing our neighbourhood, for example,
we would be flowing inside an affective process defined by an ineffable configuration of
architectural features, streets, automobiles, people, smells, lighting, movement, matter, and
technical machinery.
The fourth approach attempts to overcome the space-discourse dualism by bringing into sharper focus a new object of empirical and methodological enquiry: the messy,
complex, and constantly unfolding, entanglement of material geography, embodied practices, and language that structures place-experiences over time. Durrheim, Rautenbach,
Nicholson and Dixons (2013) study of nightclubs in South Africa offers one example
of how this kind of approach might work in practice, without pretending to resolve its
underlying philosophical tensions. Their ethnography examined both how cocktail bars
were linguistically constructed as sites of heterosexual opportunity that constitute women
as sexualised objects of desire and, simultaneously, how this process implicated a myriad
of other material structures and embodied practices. The material structures were instituted
within the design, visual imagery, and decor of place. The embodied practices were instituted within the dress codes and conduct of staff and patrons, which ranged from mundane
activities such as sitting, walking, and talking to overtly sexualised practices of flirting,
watching, and dancing. According to Durrheim et al. (2013), this affective ensemblage
of practices together constituted the cocktail bar as a space of heterosexual and heteronormative desire: a space that privileged certain ways of being and acting, certain bodies,
and certain gendered and sexualized identities.
In sum, these approaches clarify the relationship between material space and placediscourse by providing four main ideas. First, discourse about space potentially affects
physical space; second, physical space limits the sorts of discursive place-constructions that
are available, possible and meaningful; third, in experiencing physical or discursive space
there is always an excess that eludes our analytical focus if we consider only the materialas-physical and the immaterial-as-discourse; and fourth, the space-discourse dualism may
be potentially eroded by redefining the analytical unit of empirical work as an affective
patterning in which place-discourse, emplaced bodies and material space are treated as
inextricably intertwined in the production of human-environment relations. We develop
and illustrate the latter idea (see also Durrheim, Mtose & Brown 2011) in the rest of our
article.
Human-Environment Relations as Dynamic Assemblage
Our starting point is simple. We believe that researchers should neither erase nor underplay any of the main elements that constitute human-environment relations. Material
space, the body-in-space, talk in/about space or the inner experience of place, all of
these elements somehow combine to constitute the human-environment relations. The
49
50
Between 2000 and 2007, a complex, and occasionally violent, struggle unfolded
between the various parties interested in the spaces development. Some parties affirmed the
rights of local people to create a self-managed park (residents, neighbours and squatters);
others sought to enforce the original urban regeneration plan (city council and developers);
still others were opposed in principle to the occupation but also criticized the city councils
plan (members of local civic organisations). Ultimately, following a controversial consultation process, the Self-Managed Park of the Hole of Shame was demolished, its occupants
evicted, and an institutionally approved public square was created in its stead. The Hole of
Shame became Figueras Well gardens.
Elsewhere, we have presented a detailed analysis of discourse about the evolution of
this public space. We have described, for instance, how stakeholders constructed, contested
and warranted different versions of human-environment relations in order both to justify the
occupation and to oppose it (see Di Masso, Dixon & Pol 2011). However useful in its own
right, this earlier work also highlighted for us the limitations of a methodological and conceptual approach based solely on the analysis of linguistic texts. It seemed to gloss over vital
features of the struggle for the Hole of Shame and, perhaps most important, the intimate
connections between the discursive, embodied and material dimensions of that struggle.
At the same time, simply supplanting an approach focused on everyday language about the
Hole with an approach that emphasized its concrete and embodied nature seemed to us to
miss the point. The concept of place-assemblage thus emerged as a potentially useful analytical toola tool that highlighted how the Holes transformation comprised a process in
which material and discursive elements were complexly and dynamically imbricated and,
in fact, how understanding the role of one element literally demanded understanding the
role of the other.
A Methodological Perspective on the Analysis of Place-Assemblages
The analysis of place-assemblages presents two methodological challenges. On the one
hand, we require techniques for gathering data that can somehow capture a complex object
of inquiry: the emerging interplay between material features of place, embodied relations
in place, and linguistic constructions of place that crystallise into a dynamic unity. Here
place-assemblage defines a unit of analysis and operates as a methodological concept.
On the other hand, once data are gathered, a second analytic challenge emerges: How do we
unravel not only isolated instances of discourse or space or embodiment, but also moments
of assemblage? This points to the ontological dimension of assemblage as a portion of
reality, and it raises epistemological questions insofar as such an exercise of unravelling
inevitably requires an imaginative process of reconstruction that owes as much to the analysts interpretive frame and personal investments, as it does to self-evident features located
either within the environment itself or within the textual practices that surround it.
When analysing the Hole of Shame case study, for example, we began by collecting a
wide range of kinds of empirical data, including photographs taken by the first author while
doing fieldwork at the time of highest intensity of the conflict (20042005), pictures and
texts published by local newspapers, social movements blogs, visual material recorded as
part of a video-documentary entitled El Forat (The Hole), shot by a local inhabitant
in real-time as the struggle unfolded, and newspaper accounts. We then selected a series
of socio-spatial episodes that seemed to implicate, simultaneously, discursive constructions
of place, the transformation of material objects and architecture, and embodied practices.
Next, we divided episodes into two kinds of place-assemblages depending on the temporal
structure of the discourse-material-bodies entanglement. By temporal structure we mean
51
the real timing of the relational articulation of material, embodied and discursive properties meeting in the actual episode to create a locational reality. One set of episodes
included text or talk physically located in the Hole of Space that seemed to have a placeindexical quality, making sense only when emplaced geographically (e.g., see Scollon
& Scollon 2003; Benwell & Stokoe 2006, pp. 20910). The other set of events involved
circular sequences of text/talk, spatially located embodied actions and physical environmental changes (i.e., materially consequential discursive action frames and discursively
consequential material actions). As we will illustrate, the timing factor is central. It keeps
analysis within the margins of what we could call a space-embedded criterion of observable relevance (Antaki 1994). That is, analysis concentrates on what is actually going on
in the space, as a space-and-time pattern of assembled properties. However, this process
involves a narrative reconstruction of events years after the struggle happened. Since the
time factor is central in shaping place-assemblages, we may acknowledge that an in vivo
analysis of those episodes would have probably offered a perspective closer to the zeitgeist of the ongoing struggle, not easily reproducible years later but nonetheless present
in the first authors personal background.
With these methodological notes in mind, we now present some examples drawn from
our Hole of Shame case study. Textual extracts were translated from Spanish or Catalan by
the first author, and are presented here as standard written text.
Empirical Analysis: Place-Assemblage in Action
For the purpose of this article, we have selected two sequences of events that, quite literally, became landmarks in the Hole of Shame struggle. The first event inaugurated the
occupation when a group of local inhabitants planted a Christmas tree in the middle of the
empty space. The second event involved the creation of a wall and shortly afterwards its
destruction. Both events set in motion an assemblage of practices that progressively shaped
and reshaped the local environment to create a new reality for those living there. The photographs and extracts 1 and 2 included in this analysis belong to the video-documentary
mentioned in the previous subsection.
Episode One: Planting the Christmas Tree. The Hole of Shame struggle was, above all, a
struggle over spatial occupation and control. Indeed, use of the term occupation is only
possible because the struggle involved the physical appropriation, use and transformation
of an empty patch of ground. The planting of a symbolic fir tree on December 15, 2000
(Figure 1) represented its (concrete) starting point. The neighbour who video-recorded this
event offered the following account:
Extract 1
Despite the fact the Ayuntamiento1 has not made clear what is going to be done
on the soil, the demolitions have started already. A small group of neighbours
claim for a green zone. Thats why they have planted a Christmas tree.
The planting of this tree began to create a place whose meaning, we would argue, arose
only through the interrelation of its various material, embodied, and linguistic elements.
A number of things are worth noting here. First, what was planted was a tree and not, say,
a flag, washing machine, or city council sign: the object was chosen to signify something
green, natural, organic and truenot as a matter of necessity, but in combination with
the other elements with which it was imbricated (e.g., Extract 1). Second and relatedly,
52
Figure 1. Fir tree planted inside the Hole of Shame (Source. El Forat; Falconetti 2004).
this process depended upon a complex amalgam including the tree as a cultural sign, the
immediate physicality of the tree, the bodily practices involved in the planting, and the
discourse that arose around its planted presence. Third, it is not incidental that this tree
was installed inside the empty space. The location chosen had place-indexical properties,
made possible by that environment and not just any other. If the tree had been planted just a
street away, for example, its meaning would have been entirely different. Fourth, of course,
we concede that planting the tree did not, in itself, articulate, elucidate or finish a political
project. Accounts such as Extract 1 allow us to glimpse how the fir tree was rhetorically
constituted as an act of political protest. Nevertheless, we insist that this outcome arose
through the indissoluble combination of material, geo-indexical and discursive properties
that created, in that space, a meaning-full reality. It arose as an assemblage.
This theme can be illustrated further by considering the sequence of events that followed the planting of the tree. To begin with, the act of planting was itself read as a seditious
action by local authorities, who responded by sending an official to chop the tree down on
February 21, 2001. Residents responded by planting a second tree on March 9, 2001. The
significance of this act arose partly through the discursive practices that defined its meanings. As Extract 2 illustrates, for example, neighbours constructed the second planting as a
positive act of resistance, an act that somehow encapsulated their political project to give
the space life as a green environment for local people. However, at least in part, such
accounts made sense and became effective because they were entwined with other material
and embodied practices.
Extract 2
Here in the neighbourhood we have decided, the neighbours and the Hole of
Shame Collective, to buy another fir tree. Tomorrow with the kids well decorate it a little and if this is a problem for the Ayuntamiento because we havent
asked them for permission, we ask permission now: permission so they dont
remove it because it has life, that one has life.
To begin with, the second tree was of the same species as the original tree (a fir) and it
was planted in exactly the same spot as its predecessor. In this way, it could materially
embody the tenacity of a grass-roots struggle whose environmental vision had not been
53
Figure 2. Hand-written sign in the second fir tree (Source. El Forat; Falconetti 2004).
altered by the official intervention. If a different tree had been planted in a different place, its
political environmental meanings would also have been altered. In addition, once installed,
the new tree could become a focus of other kinds of place-making practices. Consider, for
example, the photograph presented in Figure 2, which depicts a hand-written sign hung
from the branches of the second tree shortly after its planting. The sign reads: I have a life.
Dont cut me. Dont kill me like happened to my brother (the Neighbours Collective of
the Hole of Shame). The death in the family image here is clearly part of the rhetoric of
environmental resistance: it serves both as a condemnation of past government action and
as an emotive plea against future intervention. Crucially, however, it signifies a particular
set of environmental meanings precisely because it is hanging from that tree in that space
and not, say, on the wall of an activists living room. That is, again, it operates as a part of
an assemblage of place-making properties.
To conclude our discussion of this opening example, we wish to add that this second
tree was also removed and, once more, an identical tree was replanted in the same place.
Indeed, over the next year, several more trees appeared in the site of the original fir tree
and numerous community activities were organised there, including meals, street-theatre,
musical events and bicycle workshops. When police finally removed the park and evicted
its defendants in November, 2002, a digger was sent in to uproot the Christmas tree (see
Figure 3) and the administration erected a wall around the Hole of Shame in order to prevent access to it. Interestingly, in this context, occupants resistance replaced the planting
of real trees with the production of symbols, objects and graffiti that incorporated tree
symbolism as part of a place-indexical rhetoric of resistance (see Figure 4).
Episode Two: The Wall of Shame. The Hole of Shame was cleared in November 2002 and
a quite different assemblage of elements emerged. Its occupants were evicted en masse,
several being physically wounded and arrested in the process (see Figure 5). Systems
of defence and surveillance were implemented to ensure that they did not return. Trees
were uprooted and other traces of the occupation removed. New territorial boundaries were
erectedinitially in the form of plastic tapes that read Police keep out and later in the
form of a concrete wall designed to permanently restrict access to the Hole (see Figure 6).
54
Figure 3. A digger uproots the fir tree (Source. El Forat; Falconetti 2004).
Figure 4. Graffiti in the Hole of Shame (Source. Nova Ciutat Vella n 72).
Figure 5. Police charge in the Hole of Shame in November 2002 (Source. Jordi Roviralta/Ediciones
El Pas, S.L., 2014).
55
Figure 6. Policemen standing by the Wall of Shame (Source. Isabel Esterman, http://www.flickr.com/
photos/isa_e/1959474001/in/set-72157603208358260/).
56
oriented, in one way or another, to the shifting realities of an environment that had been
transformed in its basic design, layout and patterns of access, occupancy, movement and
usage. Accounts did not float free or independent of this reality but were complexly focused
on, enmeshed with, and delimited by, many other non-linguistic properties shaping a
place-assemblage.
By the same token, of course, discursive constructions of the material changes wrought
by local council and police created the impetus for forms of action designed to uphold or
reverse precisely those changes. Thus, during a public assembly, one neighbour explicitly
proposed to gather in a demonstration, starting in the Hole of Shame, knocking down
the wall and taking the debris to the Ayuntamiento. This proposal met with applause
and, immediately afterwards, some revealing graffiti appeared on the wall of shame (see
Figure 7). It read 1, 2, 3, Boom, anticipating the collective action that was soon to take
place there, across the talking bricks. The ensuing demonstration (see Figure 8) began after
a popular meal and a music concert had taken place close to the wall and took the form of
a march through the neighbouring streets of Casc Antic. Yet again, we would argue, these
details of geographic placement and route are not inconsequential but an intrinsic part of
its meaning. As they arrived back at the wall of shame, protestors used their hands, stones,
fence posts, bricks, sticks and pliers to cut the wire and knock down the wall (see Figure 9).
Within half an hour, it had disappeared and hundreds of people had gathered inside the
Hole of Shame. They clapped their hands in joy and used spades to dig new holes in the
soil and put new plants in them.
The point of this brief outline is not to offer a detailed or exhaustive account of events
that led to the creation of the so-called second Self-Managed Park of the Hole of Shame.
Rather, we wish merely to indicate how such events implicated a complex, unfolding and
mutually constitutive set of practices in which the line between discourse, materiality and
the body was constantly being blurred. In this process of territorial reclamation, a complex
assemblage of tangible and intangible practices served to create, or perhaps more accurately to recover, a particular form of human-environment relations, including speeches,
marching, writing on the wall, digging and planting, and the physical destruction of territorial boundaries. This assemblage reconstructed the identity of place by plugging its many
texts, bodies, movements and spaces into one other in different ways and at different scales
57
Figure 8. Demonstration before knocking down the wall (Source. Arquitectes Sense Fronteres).
Figure 9. The people knock down the wall (Source. El Forat; Falconetti 2004).
(from the micro-location of signs to police actions and institutional bylaws) (see Malins
2004). The green and public space of the local community was resurrected, even if it was
not to last.
Conclusion
Our rationale for writing this article was to extend the emerging discursive psychological
approach to human-environment relations. Discursive psychological research has already
made several important contributions to this field of inquiry, notably by drawing attention to
the role of everyday language in constructing the meanings of place and person-place relationships. By the same token, however, such research has generally overlooked how such
meanings and relationships are not a product of linguistic practices alone. If the discursive
perspective on human-environment relations is to evolve, we feel that it needs to transcend
its traditional comfort zonesto look beyond the analysis of linguistic texts in isolation
58
and towards a more expansive approach that incorporates a wider range of methods, data
and sensitizing concepts.
In this regard, we have advocated an analytic framework that seeks to transcend the
space-discourse dualism implicit in the human-environment divide, by providing a more
complex, psychosocial account of emplaced subjectivity and social practice. Our framework presupposes that physical spaces, embodied practices and place-talk simultaneously
shape each other as constituents of a same (but shifting) unity of sense and meaning.
As such, neither arises as an independent or sui generis reality. Rather, they are always
parts of an unfolding assemblage of elements, which crystallize in moments of mutual constitution and delimitation within particular contexts. We have used the Hole of Shame case
study to illustrate just a few ways in which such assemblages unfolded within a particular
environment. In so doing, this framework echoes Foucauldian work that treats language as
inseparable from other meaning-making practices within discursive formations that already
include material spaces and embodied relations. Here, the discourse-space divide is simply
irrelevant. However, we believe that even to this audience the analytic tool of assemblage is useful as a sensitizing concept, particularly as a methodological resource to guide
analysis of the mutual constitution of space, language, material artefacts and bodies as
articulate-able properties of subjectivity that only make sense in relation to each other over
time.
Empirically, of course, a focus on assemblage poses a number of methodological challenges. It requires data-gathering techniques able to record complex patterns of space,
bodies and discourse over time (e.g., video-records, ethnographic records), whether as
textures of meaning that are inevitably unstable (see Wetherell 2012) or as sequences of
action-oriented talk, bodily practices and physical environmental changes. It also requires
modes of interpretation able to trace the environmental-psychological implications of complex entanglements of elements within specific spaces and also, perhaps, new ways of
reporting and evaluating our findings. We believe that these challenges can and should
be met. Their resolution promises to yield a richer understanding of spatial experiences
such as place identification and attachment, spatial behaviours such as boundary construction and territorial personalization, and spatial problems such as segregation and exclusion.
We can both capitalise on and develop the contribution of discursive to environmental
psychology.
Notes
1. City council.
2. Local police forces.
References
Aiello, A & Bonaiuto, M 2003, Rhetorical approach and discursive psychology: the study of environmental discourse, in M Bonnes, T Lee & M Bonaiuto (eds.), Psychological theories for
environmental issues, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 23570.
Altman, I & Low, S 1992, Place attachment, Plenum Press, New York.
Amin, A & Thrift, N 2002, Cities: re-imagining the urban, Polity, Oxford.
Antaki, C 1994, Explaining and arguing: the social organisation of accounts, Sage, London.
Auburn, T & Barnes, R 2006, Producing place: a neo-schutzian perspective on the psychology of
place, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 26, pp. 3850.
Benwell, B & Stokoe, E 2006, Discourse and identity, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
59
60
Scollon, R & Scollon, S 2003, Discourses in place. Language in the material world, Routledge,
London.
Tamboukou, M 2010, Charting cartographies of resistance: lines of flight in women artists
narratives, Gender and Education, vol. 22, pp. 67996.
Taylor, S 2010, Narratives of identity and place, Routledge, New York.
Wetherell, M 2012, Affect and emotion. A new social science understanding, Sage, London.