0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
19 vistas3 páginas
The document summarizes different forms of government throughout history and their relationship to individuals. It discusses three main forms: 1) Absolute monarchy based on the divine right of kings from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, where monarchs had full control. 2) Totalitarian dictatorships that emerged in the 20th century through communism, fascism, and nazism and ruled through terror and control. 3) Democratic systems that aim to provide equal opportunities and rule by the people, but can be corrupted without civic duty. The document concludes that the best form depends on circumstances and aims to promote common welfare and human rights.
The document summarizes different forms of government throughout history and their relationship to individuals. It discusses three main forms: 1) Absolute monarchy based on the divine right of kings from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, where monarchs had full control. 2) Totalitarian dictatorships that emerged in the 20th century through communism, fascism, and nazism and ruled through terror and control. 3) Democratic systems that aim to provide equal opportunities and rule by the people, but can be corrupted without civic duty. The document concludes that the best form depends on circumstances and aims to promote common welfare and human rights.
The document summarizes different forms of government throughout history and their relationship to individuals. It discusses three main forms: 1) Absolute monarchy based on the divine right of kings from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, where monarchs had full control. 2) Totalitarian dictatorships that emerged in the 20th century through communism, fascism, and nazism and ruled through terror and control. 3) Democratic systems that aim to provide equal opportunities and rule by the people, but can be corrupted without civic duty. The document concludes that the best form depends on circumstances and aims to promote common welfare and human rights.
Report Compilation Submitted by: SHARALYN J. RAMIREZ AB 1 Student Philo 2 (MWF 4:00 5:00)
Submitted to: MR. DARIUS A. TUMARAO Instructor
Man and the State
Man is a political animal. This is how Aristotle described mans interaction to his society or the State. This he meant that the essence of social existence is politics and that two or more men interacting with each other are invariably involved in political relationship. This relationship is called rule, authority, or power. The government is the political instrumentality of political unity. My topic which focuses to the relationship of man and state evidently implies politics. The first part discusses about the three main forms of government since the Middle Ages: a. The Divine Right of Kings Caesar is the title bestowed to Roman emperors during the Middle Ages. These titles come from the ancient doctrine that sovereigns are representatives of God and derive their right to rule directly from God. Absolute monarchy was accepted after the publication of the influential writing of one of the famous political thinkers, Niccolo Machiavelli, who is known for writing The Prince, a book which described cunning and occasionally unscrupulous methods by which rulers could acquire power, and the premise that The end justifies the means. This form of government became predominant from the 16 th century to the end of the 18th century. During the Lutheran exposition, absolute states became the sole agent of God. Sir William Blackstone accentuated the following statement in adherence to the doctrine: The king is not only incapable of doing wrong or of thinking wrong; he can never mean to do an improper thing; in him no folly or weakness. In this characterization of absolute monarchy as the application of the doctrine of the Divine Rights of Kings, I understood that monarchs, whom were believed to be descendants of God, had the full control and execution of power over their territory and people. Decisions which they promulgate are indisputable. After absolute monarchs and states were overthrown, governments were established upon the three pillars of the modern democratic society, namely; 1. Bureaucracy 2. Parliamentary Legislation 3. Independent courts of justice Absolute states, however, are still in existence nowadays. They originated in the absolutistic philosophy of Hegel and then made real trough the totalitarian system of Communism, Fascism and Nazism. b. Totalitarian Dictatorship 1. The armed forces or a political minority takes over the administrative power of the State. 2. It continues in power by the organized political party taking control of the government. The leader of the party automatically becomes the head of the government. 3. The controlling party abolishes all pre-existing parties and class organizations not associated with the ruling party. 4. Control of education, religion, science, arts and other expression and communication media. 5. Intensive and elaborate propaganda for the masses and foreign countries.
6. Establishment of a reign of terror, despotism, tyranny with all
resistance to the party brutally crushed and liquidated. 7. Complete supervision and control of national economy for the purpose of monopolizing all enterprises and nationalizing all industries. 8. Implementation of a vast military program for defense and attack in line with plans for territorial expansion and for political ambitions. This king of government which rules some countries of the world today is utterly immoral, illegal, and inhuman. Although it may accomplish extraordinary feats and develop the economic potentialities of a country to the ultimate benefit of the people, the means employed are immoral and cruel. These involve the sacrifice of innumerable human lives, and the suppression of mans natural freedoms and rights. c. The democratic system It seems that the democratic system of government which provides equal opportunities for every citizen, and practices universal suffrage, freedom under the law, free competition, etc., can fulfil human aspirations for an ideal government a government of the people, by the people, for the people; a government that exists for the sake of its citizens and not the citizens for the sake of the state. But the freedoms and privileges enjoyed in democratic countries are not always accompanied by a corresponding discharge of obligations. Democracy is good for a civic-minded and educated community. Without a moral social conscience and a sense of responsibility in the citizenry, democratic governments may offer unlimited opportunities for corruption and graft. Aristotle criticized democracy because when a government is dominated by the lower classes, the rich are taxed to provide funds for the poor. And the poor receive it again and again want the same supply. It is all like pouring water into a sieve. Democratic states, however, have an advantage over those with other forms of government. The citizens of a democracy are not only ruled; they also rule. Everybody has the right to criticize the government and the party in power. Citizens are free to express their dissatisfaction with the dishonesty and inefficiency of public officials. They may turn the public opinion against these public officials and sweep them out of power by peaceful and free elections, although the winners may later follow the evil ways of the defeated. The Best Form of Government St. Thomas preferred a moderate monarchy to other forms of government. While St. Thomas based his choice on Scriptures, Aristotle had based the prominence of monarchy on the knowledge and virtue of the king. Another good form of government for Aristotle was polity, composed of the middle class between the upper class (oligarchy) and the proletarian (democracy). Polity offers an opportunity to discern and reward superior talents. Under the point of view of Ethics, the morality of a government is not based on its external structure and political organizations but upon its functionality, in the successful attainment of its end which is to promote the common welfare of the people and to protect human right. In this sense, the best kind of government is the one best suited to the present circumstances of people, their historical traditions, economic conditions, geographical position, political experience, education, racial characteristics, religion, etc.
Name: Marwa Riaz Roll No: 25 Assignment: Political Science Semester: 2nd Department: Political Science & IR Government College Women University Faislabad